Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.3-E To Exempt Registered Investment Companies That List Certain Categories of the Securities Defined as Derivative and Special Purpose Securities Under NYSE Arca Rules From Having To Obtain Shareholder Approval Prior to the Issuance of Securities in Connection With Certain Acquisitions of the Stock or Assets of an Affiliated Company, 14778-14779 [2021-05556]
Download as PDF
14778
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 51 / Thursday, March 18, 2021 / Notices
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NASDAQ–2021–002 and
should be submitted on or before April
8, 2021.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
V. Accelerated Approval of the
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1, prior to
the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice of the filing of
Amendment No. 1 in the Federal
Register. The Commission notes that the
original proposal was published for
comment in the Federal Register,59 and
the Commission did not receive any
comments other than Nasdaq’s
amendment to the proposed rule
change. The Commission also notes that
while in the current rule, the
complimentary services period for
Eligible New Listings and for Eligible
Switches with a market capitalization of
less than $750 million is two years, the
original proposal would have extended
this period to three years for Eligible
New Listings only. By amending the
proposal to extend the complimentary
services period for Eligible Switches
with a market capitalization of less than
$750 million from two to three years,
Amendment No. 1 eliminates what
would have been a new difference
between the length of the
complimentary services period offered
to Eligible Switches with a market
capitalization of less than $750 million
and the length of the complimentary
services period offered to Eligible New
Listings. This change, and the other
minor clarifying changes in Amendment
No. 1, assist the Commission in
evaluating the Exchange’s proposal and
in determining that it is consistent with
the Act. Accordingly, the Commission
finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,60 to approve the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,61 that the
59 See
60 15
Notice, supra note 3.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
61 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Mar 17, 2021
Jkt 253001
proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ–
2021–002), as modified by Amendment
No. 1, be, and it hereby is, approved on
an accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.62
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05562 Filed 3–17–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91309; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2020–54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Designation of a
Longer Period for Commission Action
on Proceedings To Determine Whether
To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Amend NYSE
Arca Rule 5.3–E To Exempt Registered
Investment Companies That List
Certain Categories of the Securities
Defined as Derivative and Special
Purpose Securities Under NYSE Arca
Rules From Having To Obtain
Shareholder Approval Prior to the
Issuance of Securities in Connection
With Certain Acquisitions of the Stock
or Assets of an Affiliated Company
March 12, 2021.
On August 28, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.3–E
(Corporate Governance and Disclosure
Policies) to exempt certain categories of
derivative and special purpose
securities from the requirement to
obtain shareholder approval prior to the
issuance of securities in connection
with certain acquisitions of the stock or
assets of another company. The
proposed rule change was published in
the Federal Register on September 17,
2020.3 On October 30, 2020, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the
Commission designated a longer period
within which to approve the proposed
rule change, disapprove the proposed
rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the
62 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89834
(September 11, 2020), 85 FR 58090.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
1 15
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change.5 On December 1,
2020, the Exchange filed Amendment
No. 1 to the proposed rule change,
which superseded the proposed rule
change as originally filed.6 On
December 15, 2020, the Commission
published notice of Amendment No. 1
and instituted proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) of the Act 7 to
determine whether to approve or
disapprove the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.8 The
Commission has received no comments
on the proposed rule change.
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 9 provides
that, after initiating proceedings, the
Commission shall issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change not later than 180 days after
the date of publication of notice of filing
of the proposed rule change. The
Commission may extend the period for
issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change,
however, by not more than 60 days if
the Commission determines that a
longer period is appropriate and
publishes the reasons for such
determination. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in
the Federal Register on September 17,
2020.10 The 180th day after publication
of the Notice is March 16, 2021. The
Commission is extending the time
period for approving or disapproving
the proposal for an additional 60 days.
The Commission finds that it is
appropriate to designate a longer period
within which to issue an order
approving or disapproving the proposed
rule change so that it has sufficient time
to consider the proposed rule change, as
modified by Amendment No. 1.
Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant
to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,11
designates May 15, 2021, as the date by
which the Commission shall either
approve or disapprove or the proposed
rule change (File Number SR–
NYSEArca–2020–54), as modified by
Amendment No. 1.
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90297,
85 FR 70701 (November 5, 2020).
6 Amendment No. 1 is available on the
Commission’s website at https://www.sec.gov/rules/
sro/nysearca.htm.
7 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90675,
85 FR 83121 (Dec. 21, 2020).
9 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
10 See supra note 3.
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 51 / Thursday, March 18, 2021 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.12
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05556 Filed 3–17–21; 8:45 am]
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91314; File No. SR–
EMERALD–2021–08]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
Emerald, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Exchange
Rule 200, Trading Permits
March 12, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 1,
2021, MIAX Emerald, LLC (‘‘MIAX
Emerald’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I and II below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Exchange Rule 200(d) requiring
membership in another national
securities exchange or association.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/emerald at MIAX Emerald’s
principal office, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
12 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(57).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Mar 17, 2021
Jkt 253001
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend Exchange Rule
200(d) requiring membership in another
national securities exchange or
association. In sum, Exchange Rule
200(d) currently requires that Trading
Permit 3 holders be a member in another
registered options exchange, other than
the Exchange’s affiliates, the Miami
International Securities Exchange, LLC
(‘‘MIAX’’) or MIAX PEARL, LLC
(‘‘PEARL’’), or the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
where such other registered options
exchange has not been designated by the
Commission, pursuant to Rule 17d–1
under the Exchange Act, to examine
Members for compliance with financial
responsibility rules. Exchange Rule
200(d), therefore, does not allow a
Trading Permit Holder that is not a
FINRA member 4 to satisfy this
requirement by being a member of a
registered equities exchange. The
Exchange believes that requiring
membership in another registered
options exchange is unnecessarily too
restrictive and is also not in line with
similar membership requirements at
other exchanges.5 Therefore, to enable
more broker-dealers to become Trading
Permit holders, the Exchange proposes
to amend Exchange Rule 200(d) to
require membership in a registered
national securities exchange, rather than
only registered options exchanges.6
Exchange Rule 200(d) will continue to
require Trading Permit holders to be
FINRA members where the registered
national securities exchange that they
maintain membership is not designated
3 The term ‘‘Trading Permit’’ means a permit
issued by the Exchange that confers the ability to
transact on the Exchange. See Exchange Rule 100.
4 A Trading Permit Holder that does not transact
business with the public is not required to become
a FINRA member. Section 15(b)(8) of the Act that
requires members that transact business with the
public to be a member of FINRA. 15 U.S.C.
78o(b)(8).
5 See Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’) Rule
2.5(a)(4), Cboe EDGA Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGA’’) Rule
2.5(a)(4), Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BZX’’) Rule
2.5(a)(4), Cboe BYX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘BYX’’,
collectively with EDGX, EDGA, and BZX, the ‘‘Cboe
Equity Exchanges’’) Rule 2.5(a)(4), MEMX LLC
(‘‘MEMX’’) Rule 2.5(a)(4), Investors Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘IEX’’) Rule 2.130(a), Long Term Stock Exchange,
Inc. (‘‘LTSE’’) Rule 2.130 and BOX Exchange LLC
(‘‘BOX’’) Rule 2020(a).
6 The Exchange also propose to include the
phrase ‘‘or FINRA’’ at the end of Exchange Rule
200(d)’s title.
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14779
by the Commission to examine members
for compliance with financial
responsibility rules pursuant to Rule
17d–1 of the Exchange Act.7
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,8
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(5),9 in particular, because it
is designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
regulating, clearing, settling, processing
information with respect to, and
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change would remove
impediments to, and perfect the
mechanisms of, a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, protect investors and the public
interest by expanding the number of
registered brokers-dealers that would be
eligible to become Trading Permit
holders and trade on the Exchange,
while maintaining high regulatory
standards and a comprehensive
regulatory regime with respect to such
firms. Exchange Rule 200(d) was too
restrictive by limiting membership in
another registered national securities
exchange to only registered options
exchanges and, therefore, unnecessarily
precluded broker-dealers who were
members of a registered equities
exchange from becoming Trading Permit
holders. As mentioned above, Exchange
Rule 200(d) will continue to require
Trading Permit holders to be FINRA
members where the registered national
securities exchange that they maintain
membership is not designated by the
Commission to examine members for
compliance with financial responsibility
rules pursuant to Rule 17d–1 of the
Exchange Act. This will ensure that
those Trading Permit holders that are
not FINRA members maintain
membership at a registered options or
equities exchange that may be
7 Rule 17d–1 of the Act authorizes the
Commission to name a single Self-Regulatory
Organization (‘‘SRO’’) as the Designated Examining
Authority (‘‘DEA’’) to examine members of more
than one SRO (‘‘common member’’) for compliance
with the financial responsibility requirements
imposed by the Exchange Act, or by Commission
or SRO rules. 17 CFR 240.17d–1. The Exchange
does not currently act as the DEA for any Trading
Permit holder.
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\18MRN1.SGM
18MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 51 (Thursday, March 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14778-14779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05556]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91309; File No. SR-NYSEArca-2020-54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc.; Notice of
Designation of a Longer Period for Commission Action on Proceedings To
Determine Whether To Approve or Disapprove a Proposed Rule Change, as
Modified by Amendment No. 1, To Amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.3-E To Exempt
Registered Investment Companies That List Certain Categories of the
Securities Defined as Derivative and Special Purpose Securities Under
NYSE Arca Rules From Having To Obtain Shareholder Approval Prior to the
Issuance of Securities in Connection With Certain Acquisitions of the
Stock or Assets of an Affiliated Company
March 12, 2021.
On August 28, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (``Exchange'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission''), pursuant to
Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\
and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a proposed rule change to amend NYSE Arca
Rule 5.3-E (Corporate Governance and Disclosure Policies) to exempt
certain categories of derivative and special purpose securities from
the requirement to obtain shareholder approval prior to the issuance of
securities in connection with certain acquisitions of the stock or
assets of another company. The proposed rule change was published in
the Federal Register on September 17, 2020.\3\ On October 30, 2020,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\4\ the Commission designated a
longer period within which to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to
determine whether to disapprove the proposed rule change.\5\ On
December 1, 2020, the Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the proposed
rule change, which superseded the proposed rule change as originally
filed.\6\ On December 15, 2020, the Commission published notice of
Amendment No. 1 and instituted proceedings under Section 19(b)(2)(B) of
the Act \7\ to determine whether to approve or disapprove the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1.\8\ The Commission has
received no comments on the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89834 (September 11,
2020), 85 FR 58090.
\4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\5\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90297, 85 FR 70701
(November 5, 2020).
\6\ Amendment No. 1 is available on the Commission's website at
https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro/nysearca.htm.
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90675, 85 FR 83121
(Dec. 21, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act \9\ provides that, after initiating
proceedings, the Commission shall issue an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change not later than 180 days after the
date of publication of notice of filing of the proposed rule change.
The Commission may extend the period for issuing an order approving or
disapproving the proposed rule change, however, by not more than 60
days if the Commission determines that a longer period is appropriate
and publishes the reasons for such determination. The proposed rule
change was published for comment in the Federal Register on September
17, 2020.\10\ The 180th day after publication of the Notice is March
16, 2021. The Commission is extending the time period for approving or
disapproving the proposal for an additional 60 days.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
\10\ See supra note 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission finds that it is appropriate to designate a longer
period within which to issue an order approving or disapproving the
proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the
proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment No. 1. Accordingly, the
Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\11\ designates May
15, 2021, as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or
disapprove or the proposed rule change (File Number SR-NYSEArca-2020-
54), as modified by Amendment No. 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
[[Page 14779]]
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(57).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-05556 Filed 3-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P