Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX PEARL Fee Schedule, 14653-14656 [2021-05445]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 17, 2021 / Notices
the information collection requirement
or request: 5,372 hours (56 hours
reporting and 5,316 hours
recordkeeping).
10. Abstract: 10 CFR part 61,
establishes the procedures, criteria, and
license terms and conditions for the
land disposal of low-level radioactive
waste. The reporting and recordkeeping
requirements are mandatory and, in the
case of application submittals, are
required to obtain a benefit. The
information collected in the
applications, reports, and records is
evaluated by the NRC to ensure that the
licensee’s or applicant’s disposal
facility, equipment, organization,
training, experience, procedures, and
plans provide an adequate level of
protection of public health and safety,
common defense and security, and the
environment.
Dated: March 12, 2021.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
David C. Cullison,
NRC Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
[Release No. 34–91302; File No. SR–
PEARL–2021–06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX
PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
PEARL Fee Schedule
March 11, 2021.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 1,
2021, MIAX PEARL, LLC (‘‘MIAX
PEARL’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule change
as described in Items I, II, and III below,
which Items have been prepared by the
Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to
amend the MIAX PEARL Fee Schedule
(the ‘‘Fee Schedule’’) for the Exchange’s
options market.
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 16, 2021
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
2 17
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2021–05536 Filed 3–16–21; 8:45 am]
1 15
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://www.miaxoptions.com/rulefilings/pearl at MIAX PEARL’s principal
office, and at the Commission’s Public
Reference Room.
Jkt 253001
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Add/Remove Tiered Rebates/Fees set
forth in Section (1)(a) the Fee Schedule
for the Exchange’s options market to: (i)
Increase Taker (as defined below) fees in
certain Tiers (defined below) for options
transactions in Penny classes (as
defined below) (excluding SPY, QQQ,
and IWM) for Priority Customers; 3 (ii)
increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for
options transactions in Penny classes for
MIAX PEARL Market Makers 4 when
trading against origins other than
Priority Customer; (iii) increase the
Taker fees in certain Tiers for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX
PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins and
when the executing buyer and seller are
3 ‘‘Priority Customer’’ means a person or entity
that (i) is not a broker or dealer in securities, and
(ii) does not place more than 390 orders in listed
options per day on average during a calendar month
for its own beneficial accounts(s). The number of
orders shall be counted in accordance with
Interpretation and Policy .01 of Exchange Rule 100.
See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and
Exchange Rule 100.
4 ‘‘Market Maker’’ means a Member registered
with the Exchange for the purpose of making
markets in options contracts traded on the
Exchange and that is vested with the rights and
responsibilities specified in Chapter VI of Exchange
Rules. See the Definitions Section of the Fee
Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14653
not the same Member 5 or Affiliates; 6
and (iv) increase Taker fees in certain
Tiers for options transactions in Penny
classes for ‘‘Professional Members’’
(listed in the table in Section (1)(a) of
the Fee Schedule as Non-Priority
Customer, Firm, BD, and Non-MIAX
PEARL Market Makers).
Background
The Exchange currently assesses
transaction rebates and fees to all
market participants which are based
upon the total monthly volume
executed by the Member on MIAX
PEARL in the relevant, respective origin
type (not including Excluded
Contracts) 7 (as the numerator)
expressed as a percentage of (divided
by) TCV 8 (as the denominator). In
5 ‘‘Member’’ means an individual or organization
that is registered with the Exchange pursuant to
Chapter II of Exchange Rules for purposes of trading
on the Exchange as an ‘‘Electronic Exchange
Member’’ or ‘‘Market Maker.’’ Members are deemed
‘‘members’’ under the Exchange Act. See the
Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule and
Exchange Rule 100.
6 ‘‘Affiliate’’ means (i) an affiliate of a Member of
at least 75% common ownership between the firms
as reflected on each firm’s Form BD, Schedule A,
or (ii) the Appointed Market Maker of an Appointed
EEM (or, conversely, the Appointed EEM of an
Appointed Market Maker). An ‘‘Appointed Market
Maker’’ is a MIAX PEARL Market Maker (who does
not otherwise have a corporate affiliation based
upon common ownership with an EEM) that has
been appointed by an EEM and an ‘‘Appointed
EEM’’ is an EEM (who does not otherwise have a
corporate affiliation based upon common
ownership with a MIAX PEARL Market Maker) that
has been appointed by a MIAX PEARL Market
Maker, pursuant to the following process. A MIAX
PEARL Market Maker appoints an EEM and an EEM
appoints a MIAX PEARL Market Maker, for the
purposes of the Fee Schedule, by each completing
and sending an executed Volume Aggregation
Request Form by email to membership@
miaxoptions.com no later than 2 business days
prior to the first business day of the month in which
the designation is to become effective. Transmittal
of a validly completed and executed form to the
Exchange along with the Exchange’s
acknowledgement of the effective designation to
each of the Market Maker and EEM will be viewed
as acceptance of the appointment. The Exchange
will only recognize one designation per Member. A
Member may make a designation not more than
once every 12 months (from the date of its most
recent designation), which designation shall remain
in effect unless or until the Exchange receives
written notice submitted 2 business days prior to
the first business day of the month from either
Member indicating that the appointment has been
terminated. Designations will become operative on
the first business day of the effective month and
may not be terminated prior to the end of the
month. Execution data and reports will be provided
to both parties. See the Definitions Section of the
Fee Schedule.
7 ‘‘Excluded Contracts’’ means any contracts
routed to an away market for execution. See the
Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule.
8 ‘‘TCV’’ means total consolidated volume
calculated as the total national volume in those
classes listed on MIAX PEARL for the month for
which the fees apply, excluding consolidated
volume executed during the period time in which
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
Continued
17MRN1
14654
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 17, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
addition, the per contract transaction
rebates and fees are applied
retroactively to all eligible volume for
that origin type once the respective
threshold tier (‘‘Tier’’) has been reached
by the Member. The Exchange
aggregates the volume of Members and
their Affiliates. Members that place
resting liquidity, i.e., orders resting on
the book of the MIAX PEARL System,9
are paid the specified ‘‘maker’’ rebate
(each a ‘‘Maker’’), and Members that
execute against resting liquidity are
assessed the specified ‘‘taker’’ fee (each
a ‘‘Taker’’). For opening transactions
and ABBO 10 uncrossing transactions,
per contract transaction rebates and fees
are waived for all market participants.
Finally, Members are assessed lower
transaction fees and receive lower
rebates for order executions in standard
option classes in the Penny Interval
Program 11 (‘‘Penny Classes’’) than for
order executions in standard option
classes which are not in the Penny
Interval Program (‘‘Non-Penny
Classes’’), where Members are assessed
higher transaction fees and receive
higher rebates.
the Exchange experiences an ‘‘Exchange System
Disruption’’ (solely in the option classes of the
affected Matching Engine (as defined below)). The
term Exchange System Disruption, which is defined
in the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule,
means an outage of a Matching Engine or collective
Matching Engines for a period of two consecutive
hours or more, during trading hours. The term
Matching Engine, which is also defined in the
Definitions section of the Fee Schedule, is a part of
the MIAX PEARL electronic system that processes
options orders and trades on a symbol-by-symbol
basis. Some Matching Engines will process option
classes with multiple root symbols, and other
Matching Engines may be dedicated to one single
option root symbol (for example, options on SPY
may be processed by one single Matching Engine
that is dedicated only to SPY). A particular root
symbol may only be assigned to a single designated
Matching Engine. A particular root symbol may not
be assigned to multiple Matching Engines. The
Exchange believes that it is reasonable and
appropriate to select two consecutive hours as the
amount of time necessary to constitute an Exchange
System Disruption, as two hours equates to
approximately 1.4% of available trading time per
month. The Exchange notes that the term
‘‘Exchange System Disruption’’ and its meaning
have no applicability outside of the Fee Schedule,
as it is used solely for purposes of calculating
volume for the threshold tiers in the Fee Schedule.
See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule.
9 The term ‘‘System’’ means the automated
trading system used by the Exchange for the trading
of securities. See Exchange Rule 100.
10 ‘‘ABBO’’ means the best bid(s) or offer(s)
disseminated by other Eligible Exchanges (defined
in Exchange Rule 1400(g) and calculated by the
Exchange based on market information received by
the Exchange from OPRA. See the Definitions
Section of the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule
100.
11 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88992
(June 2, 2020), 85 FR 35142 (June 8, 2020) (SR–
PEARL–2020–06).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
Taker Fees
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Fee Schedule for the Exchange’s options
market to: (i) Increase Taker fees in
certain Tiers for options transactions in
Penny classes (excluding SPY, QQQ,
and IWM) for Priority Customers; (ii)
increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for
options transactions in Penny classes for
MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against origins other than
Priority Customer; (iii) increase the
Taker fees in certain Tiers for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX
PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins and
when the executing buyer and seller are
not the same Member or Affiliates; and
(iv) increase Taker fees in certain Tiers
for options transactions in Penny classes
for Professional Members.
In particular, the Exchange proposes
to increase the Taker fees for Priority
Customer orders in options in certain
Penny classes (excluding SPY, QQQ,
and IWM) in Tier 3 from $0.48 to $0.50,
in Tier 4 from $0.47 to $0.49, in Tier 5
from $0.46 to $0.48, and in Tier 6 from
$0.45 to $0.47. The Exchange next
proposes to increase the Taker fees for
options transactions in Penny classes for
MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against origins other than
Priority Customer in Tier 4 from $0.49
to $0.50, in Tier 5 from $0.47 to $0.50,
and in Tier 6 from $0.46 to $0.50.
The Exchange also proposes to
increase the Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX
PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in
Tiers 5 and 6 when the executing buyer
and seller are not the same Member or
Affiliates. In particular, the Exchange
proposes to increase the Taker fees for
options transactions in Penny classes for
MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against Priority Customer origins
in Tiers 5 and 6 from the current $0.48
and $0.47, respectively, to the proposed
$0.50 per contract when the executing
buyer and seller are not the same
Member or Affiliates. The Exchange
proposes that Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX
PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in
Tiers 5 and 6 will remain at their
current levels of $0.48 and $0.47,
respectively, when the executing buyer
and seller are the same Member or
Affiliates.
In order to differentiate between the
proposed increased Taker fees for
options transactions in Penny classes for
MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against Priority Customer origins
in Tiers 5 and 6 when the executing
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
buyer and seller are not the same
Member or Affiliates, the Exchange
proposes to insert two new symbols
immediately following the table of fees
and rebates for Professional Members in
Section (1)(a) of the Fee Schedule. In
particular, the Exchange proposes to
adopt new symbol ‘‘★,’’ and the
following explanatory sentence: ‘‘This
Taker rate is for executed MIAX PEARL
Market Maker Orders when the
executing buyer and seller are the same
Member or Affiliates.’’ The Exchange
also proposes to adopt new symbol ‘‘✧,’’
and the following explanatory sentence:
‘‘This Taker rate is for executed MIAX
PEARL Market Maker Orders when the
executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates.’’
Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
insert each symbol following the
corresponding Taker fee for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX
PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in
Tiers 5 and 6.
The Exchange also proposes to
increase the Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for
Professional Members when trading
against origins other than Priority
Customer in Tier 5 from $0.49 to $0.50
and in Tier 6 from $0.49 to $0.50.
The purpose of adjusting the specified
Taker fees is for business and
competitive reasons. In order to attract
order flow, the Exchange initially set its
Taker fees so that they were
meaningfully lower than other options
exchanges that operate comparable
maker/taker pricing models.12 The
Exchange now believes that it is
appropriate to further adjust these
specified Taker fees so that they are
more in line with other exchanges, but
will still remain highly competitive
such that they should enable the
Exchange to continue to attract order
flow and maintain market share.13
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal to amend its Fee Schedule is
consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act 14
in general, and furthers the objectives of
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,15 in that it is
an equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees and other charges among
Exchange members and issuers and
other persons using its facilities, and
12 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos.
80915 (June 13, 2017), 82 FR 27912 (June 19, 2017)
(SR–PEARL–2017–29); 80914 (June 13, 2017), 82 FR
27910 (June 19, 2017) (SR–PEARL–2017–30).
13 See Cboe BZX Options Exchange Fee Schedule,
under ‘‘Transaction Fees.’’
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
15 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 17, 2021 / Notices
6(b)(5) of the Act,16 in that it is designed
to prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, to foster
cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanisms of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
The Commission has repeatedly
expressed its preference for competition
over regulatory intervention in
determining prices, products, and
services in the securities markets. In
Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 17
There are currently 16 registered
options exchanges competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based
options, no single exchange has more
than approximately 15% market share
for the month of February 2021.18
Therefore, no exchange possesses
significant pricing power. More
specifically, as of February 26, 2021, the
Exchange has a market share of
approximately 4.75% of executed
volume of multiply-listed equity and
exchange traded fund (‘‘ETF’’) options
for the month of February 2021.19 The
Exchange believes that the ever-shifting
market share among the exchanges from
month to month demonstrates that
market participants can discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products and services, terminate an
existing membership or determine to
not become a new member, and/or shift
order flow, in response to transaction
fee changes. For example, on February
28, 2019, the Exchange filed with the
Commission a proposal to increase
Taker fees in certain Tiers for options
transactions in certain Penny classes for
Priority Customers and decrease Maker
rebates in certain Tiers for options
transactions in Penny classes for
Priority Customers (which fee was to be
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
16 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and (b)(5).
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
18 The Options Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’)
publishes options and futures volume in a variety
of formats, including daily and monthly volume by
exchange, available here: https://www.theocc.com/
market-data/volume/default.jsp.
19 See id.
17 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
effective March 1, 2019).20 The
Exchange experienced a decrease in
total market share for the month of
March 2019, after the proposal went
into effect. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes that its March 1, 2019 fee
change, to increase certain transaction
fees and decrease certain transaction
rebates, may have contributed to the
decrease in MIAX PEARL’s market share
and, as such, the Exchange believes
competitive forces constrain the
Exchange’s, and other options
exchanges, ability to set transaction fees
and market participants can shift order
flow based on fee changes instituted by
the exchanges.
The Exchange believes its proposal to
increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for
options transactions in Penny classes for
Priority Customers, Market Makers, and
Professional Members is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because all similarly
situated market participants in the same
Origin type are subject to the same
tiered Taker fees and access to the
Exchange is offered on terms that are
not unfairly discriminatory. For
competitive and business reasons, the
Exchange initially set its Taker fees for
such orders generally lower than certain
other options exchanges that operate
comparable maker/taker pricing
models.21 The Exchange now believes
that it is appropriate to increase those
specified Taker fees so that they are
more in line with other exchanges, and
will still remain highly competitive
such that they should enable the
Exchange to continue to attract order
flow and maintain market share. The
Exchange believes for these reasons that
increasing certain Taker fees for
transactions in the specified Tiers is
equitable, reasonable and not unfairly
discriminatory, and thus consistent with
the Act.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
adopt a higher Taker fee for certain
Market Maker orders in Penny classes
when trading against Priority Customer
origins in Tiers 5 and 6 when the
executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates (versus when
the executing buyer and seller are the
same Member or Affiliates) provides for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues and fees and is not unfairly
discriminatory since the Exchange
already offers certain transaction fee
discounts to Members and their
Affiliates that aggregate their order flow
on these types of transactions through
20 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85304
(March 13, 2019), 84 FR 10144 (March 19, 2019)
(SR–PEARL–2019–07).
21 See supra note 12.
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14655
various pricing structures in Section
(1)(a) of the Fee Schedule.22 The
Exchange further believes this proposal
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues and fees and is not
unfairly discriminatory since the
Exchange’s affiliate, Miami International
Securities Exchange, LLC (‘‘MIAX’’),
provides similar pricing structures and
offers certain transaction fee discounts
to MIAX Members and their Affiliates
that aggregate their order flow on certain
types of transactions through various
tier-based pricing structures.23
Accordingly, the Exchange believes it is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge a higher Taker
fee for certain Market Maker orders in
Penny classes when trading against
Priority Customer origins when the
executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates, as other
discount programs currently exist for
the same Member and Affiliates.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes in the Taker fees for the
applicable market participants should
continue to encourage the provision of
liquidity that enhances the quality of
the Exchange’s market and increases the
number of trading opportunities on the
Exchange for all participants who will
be able to compete for such
opportunities. The proposed rule
changes should enable the Exchange to
continue to attract and compete for
order flow with other exchanges.
However, this competition does not
create an undue burden on competition
but rather offers all market participants
the opportunity to receive the benefit of
competitive pricing.
The proposed Taker fee adjustments
are intended to keep the Exchange’s fees
highly competitive with those of other
exchanges, and to encourage liquidity
and should enable the Exchange to
continue to attract and compete for
order flow with other exchanges. The
Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
rebates and fees to remain competitive
22 See
Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a).
MIAX Fee Schedule, Sections 1(a)(i)–(ii)
and Section 1(a)(iii), notes ‘‘p’’ and ‘‘■’’.
23 See
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
14656
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 50 / Wednesday, March 17, 2021 / Notices
with other exchanges and to attract
order flow. The Exchange believes that
the proposed rule changes reflect this
competitive environment because the
proposal modifies the Exchange’s fees in
a manner that encourages market
participants to continue to provide
liquidity and to send order flow to the
Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,24 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 25 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is
necessary or appropriate in the public
interest, for the protection of investors,
or otherwise in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
PEARL–2021–06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2021–06. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–PEARL–2021–06 and
should be submitted on or before April
7, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.26
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05445 Filed 3–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91297; File No. SR–NYSE–
2021–16]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its
Price List
March 11, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on March 1,
2021, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
26 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 15 U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
24 15
25 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Mar 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List to cap the maximum average
number of shares per day for the billing
month in calculating the average
monthly consolidated average daily
volume (‘‘CADV’’) and NYSE CADV for
purposes of Step Up Adding Tier 3. The
Exchange proposes to implement the fee
changes effective March 1, 2021. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its
Price List to cap the maximum average
number of shares per day for the billing
month in calculating CADV and NYSE
CADV for purposes of Step Up Adding
Tier 3.
The proposed changes respond to the
current volatile market environment
that has resulted in unprecedented
average daily volumes and the
temporary closure of the Trading Floor,4
4 Beginning on March 16, 2020, in order to slow
COVID–19 through social distancing measures,
significant limitations were placed on large
gatherings throughout the country. As a result, on
March 18, 2020, the Exchange determined that
beginning March 23, 2020, the physical Trading
Floor facilities located at 11 Wall Street in New
York City would close and that the Exchange would
move, on a temporary basis, to fully electronic
trading. See Press Release, dated March 18, 2020,
E:\FR\FM\17MRN1.SGM
17MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 50 (Wednesday, March 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14653-14656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05445]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91302; File No. SR-PEARL-2021-06]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MIAX PEARL, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the MIAX
PEARL Fee Schedule
March 11, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 1, 2021, MIAX PEARL, LLC (``MIAX PEARL'' or ``Exchange'')
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') a
proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which
Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from
interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing a proposal to amend the MIAX PEARL Fee
Schedule (the ``Fee Schedule'') for the Exchange's options market.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://www.miaxoptions.com/rule-filings/pearl at MIAX
PEARL's principal office, and at the Commission's Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend the Add/Remove Tiered Rebates/Fees
set forth in Section (1)(a) the Fee Schedule for the Exchange's options
market to: (i) Increase Taker (as defined below) fees in certain Tiers
(defined below) for options transactions in Penny classes (as defined
below) (excluding SPY, QQQ, and IWM) for Priority Customers; \3\ (ii)
increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for options transactions in Penny
classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers \4\ when trading against origins
other than Priority Customer; (iii) increase the Taker fees in certain
Tiers for options transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market
Makers when trading against Priority Customer origins and when the
executing buyer and seller are not the same Member \5\ or Affiliates;
\6\ and (iv) increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for options
transactions in Penny classes for ``Professional Members'' (listed in
the table in Section (1)(a) of the Fee Schedule as Non-Priority
Customer, Firm, BD, and Non-MIAX PEARL Market Makers).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ ``Priority Customer'' means a person or entity that (i) is
not a broker or dealer in securities, and (ii) does not place more
than 390 orders in listed options per day on average during a
calendar month for its own beneficial accounts(s). The number of
orders shall be counted in accordance with Interpretation and Policy
.01 of Exchange Rule 100. See the Definitions Section of the Fee
Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
\4\ ``Market Maker'' means a Member registered with the Exchange
for the purpose of making markets in options contracts traded on the
Exchange and that is vested with the rights and responsibilities
specified in Chapter VI of Exchange Rules. See the Definitions
Section of the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
\5\ ``Member'' means an individual or organization that is
registered with the Exchange pursuant to Chapter II of Exchange
Rules for purposes of trading on the Exchange as an ``Electronic
Exchange Member'' or ``Market Maker.'' Members are deemed
``members'' under the Exchange Act. See the Definitions Section of
the Fee Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
\6\ ``Affiliate'' means (i) an affiliate of a Member of at least
75% common ownership between the firms as reflected on each firm's
Form BD, Schedule A, or (ii) the Appointed Market Maker of an
Appointed EEM (or, conversely, the Appointed EEM of an Appointed
Market Maker). An ``Appointed Market Maker'' is a MIAX PEARL Market
Maker (who does not otherwise have a corporate affiliation based
upon common ownership with an EEM) that has been appointed by an EEM
and an ``Appointed EEM'' is an EEM (who does not otherwise have a
corporate affiliation based upon common ownership with a MIAX PEARL
Market Maker) that has been appointed by a MIAX PEARL Market Maker,
pursuant to the following process. A MIAX PEARL Market Maker
appoints an EEM and an EEM appoints a MIAX PEARL Market Maker, for
the purposes of the Fee Schedule, by each completing and sending an
executed Volume Aggregation Request Form by email to
[email protected] no later than 2 business days prior to
the first business day of the month in which the designation is to
become effective. Transmittal of a validly completed and executed
form to the Exchange along with the Exchange's acknowledgement of
the effective designation to each of the Market Maker and EEM will
be viewed as acceptance of the appointment. The Exchange will only
recognize one designation per Member. A Member may make a
designation not more than once every 12 months (from the date of its
most recent designation), which designation shall remain in effect
unless or until the Exchange receives written notice submitted 2
business days prior to the first business day of the month from
either Member indicating that the appointment has been terminated.
Designations will become operative on the first business day of the
effective month and may not be terminated prior to the end of the
month. Execution data and reports will be provided to both parties.
See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background
The Exchange currently assesses transaction rebates and fees to all
market participants which are based upon the total monthly volume
executed by the Member on MIAX PEARL in the relevant, respective origin
type (not including Excluded Contracts) \7\ (as the numerator)
expressed as a percentage of (divided by) TCV \8\ (as the denominator).
In
[[Page 14654]]
addition, the per contract transaction rebates and fees are applied
retroactively to all eligible volume for that origin type once the
respective threshold tier (``Tier'') has been reached by the Member.
The Exchange aggregates the volume of Members and their Affiliates.
Members that place resting liquidity, i.e., orders resting on the book
of the MIAX PEARL System,\9\ are paid the specified ``maker'' rebate
(each a ``Maker''), and Members that execute against resting liquidity
are assessed the specified ``taker'' fee (each a ``Taker''). For
opening transactions and ABBO \10\ uncrossing transactions, per
contract transaction rebates and fees are waived for all market
participants. Finally, Members are assessed lower transaction fees and
receive lower rebates for order executions in standard option classes
in the Penny Interval Program \11\ (``Penny Classes'') than for order
executions in standard option classes which are not in the Penny
Interval Program (``Non-Penny Classes''), where Members are assessed
higher transaction fees and receive higher rebates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ ``Excluded Contracts'' means any contracts routed to an away
market for execution. See the Definitions Section of the Fee
Schedule.
\8\ ``TCV'' means total consolidated volume calculated as the
total national volume in those classes listed on MIAX PEARL for the
month for which the fees apply, excluding consolidated volume
executed during the period time in which the Exchange experiences an
``Exchange System Disruption'' (solely in the option classes of the
affected Matching Engine (as defined below)). The term Exchange
System Disruption, which is defined in the Definitions section of
the Fee Schedule, means an outage of a Matching Engine or collective
Matching Engines for a period of two consecutive hours or more,
during trading hours. The term Matching Engine, which is also
defined in the Definitions section of the Fee Schedule, is a part of
the MIAX PEARL electronic system that processes options orders and
trades on a symbol-by-symbol basis. Some Matching Engines will
process option classes with multiple root symbols, and other
Matching Engines may be dedicated to one single option root symbol
(for example, options on SPY may be processed by one single Matching
Engine that is dedicated only to SPY). A particular root symbol may
only be assigned to a single designated Matching Engine. A
particular root symbol may not be assigned to multiple Matching
Engines. The Exchange believes that it is reasonable and appropriate
to select two consecutive hours as the amount of time necessary to
constitute an Exchange System Disruption, as two hours equates to
approximately 1.4% of available trading time per month. The Exchange
notes that the term ``Exchange System Disruption'' and its meaning
have no applicability outside of the Fee Schedule, as it is used
solely for purposes of calculating volume for the threshold tiers in
the Fee Schedule. See the Definitions Section of the Fee Schedule.
\9\ The term ``System'' means the automated trading system used
by the Exchange for the trading of securities. See Exchange Rule
100.
\10\ ``ABBO'' means the best bid(s) or offer(s) disseminated by
other Eligible Exchanges (defined in Exchange Rule 1400(g) and
calculated by the Exchange based on market information received by
the Exchange from OPRA. See the Definitions Section of the Fee
Schedule and Exchange Rule 100.
\11\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88992 (June 2,
2020), 85 FR 35142 (June 8, 2020) (SR-PEARL-2020-06).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taker Fees
The Exchange proposes to amend the Fee Schedule for the Exchange's
options market to: (i) Increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for options
transactions in Penny classes (excluding SPY, QQQ, and IWM) for
Priority Customers; (ii) increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for
options transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against origins other than Priority Customer; (iii) increase
the Taker fees in certain Tiers for options transactions in Penny
classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when trading against Priority
Customer origins and when the executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates; and (iv) increase Taker fees in certain
Tiers for options transactions in Penny classes for Professional
Members.
In particular, the Exchange proposes to increase the Taker fees for
Priority Customer orders in options in certain Penny classes (excluding
SPY, QQQ, and IWM) in Tier 3 from $0.48 to $0.50, in Tier 4 from $0.47
to $0.49, in Tier 5 from $0.46 to $0.48, and in Tier 6 from $0.45 to
$0.47. The Exchange next proposes to increase the Taker fees for
options transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when
trading against origins other than Priority Customer in Tier 4 from
$0.49 to $0.50, in Tier 5 from $0.47 to $0.50, and in Tier 6 from $0.46
to $0.50.
The Exchange also proposes to increase the Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6 when the executing
buyer and seller are not the same Member or Affiliates. In particular,
the Exchange proposes to increase the Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6 from the current
$0.48 and $0.47, respectively, to the proposed $0.50 per contract when
the executing buyer and seller are not the same Member or Affiliates.
The Exchange proposes that Taker fees for options transactions in Penny
classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when trading against Priority
Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6 will remain at their current levels
of $0.48 and $0.47, respectively, when the executing buyer and seller
are the same Member or Affiliates.
In order to differentiate between the proposed increased Taker fees
for options transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers
when trading against Priority Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6 when
the executing buyer and seller are not the same Member or Affiliates,
the Exchange proposes to insert two new symbols immediately following
the table of fees and rebates for Professional Members in Section
(1)(a) of the Fee Schedule. In particular, the Exchange proposes to
adopt new symbol ``[starf],'' and the following explanatory sentence:
``This Taker rate is for executed MIAX PEARL Market Maker Orders when
the executing buyer and seller are the same Member or Affiliates.'' The
Exchange also proposes to adopt new symbol ``[loz],'' and the following
explanatory sentence: ``This Taker rate is for executed MIAX PEARL
Market Maker Orders when the executing buyer and seller are not the
same Member or Affiliates.'' Accordingly, the Exchange proposes to
insert each symbol following the corresponding Taker fee for options
transactions in Penny classes for MIAX PEARL Market Makers when trading
against Priority Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6.
The Exchange also proposes to increase the Taker fees for options
transactions in Penny classes for Professional Members when trading
against origins other than Priority Customer in Tier 5 from $0.49 to
$0.50 and in Tier 6 from $0.49 to $0.50.
The purpose of adjusting the specified Taker fees is for business
and competitive reasons. In order to attract order flow, the Exchange
initially set its Taker fees so that they were meaningfully lower than
other options exchanges that operate comparable maker/taker pricing
models.\12\ The Exchange now believes that it is appropriate to further
adjust these specified Taker fees so that they are more in line with
other exchanges, but will still remain highly competitive such that
they should enable the Exchange to continue to attract order flow and
maintain market share.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 80915 (June 13,
2017), 82 FR 27912 (June 19, 2017) (SR-PEARL-2017-29); 80914 (June
13, 2017), 82 FR 27910 (June 19, 2017) (SR-PEARL-2017-30).
\13\ See Cboe BZX Options Exchange Fee Schedule, under
``Transaction Fees.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal to amend its Fee Schedule
is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act \14\ in general, and
furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,\15\ in that it
is an equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges
among Exchange members and issuers and other persons using its
facilities, and
[[Page 14655]]
6(b)(5) of the Act,\16\ in that it is designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanisms of a free and open market and
a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and (b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for
competition over regulatory intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS,
the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496 (June 29, 2005).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than approximately 15%
market share for the month of February 2021.\18\ Therefore, no exchange
possesses significant pricing power. More specifically, as of February
26, 2021, the Exchange has a market share of approximately 4.75% of
executed volume of multiply-listed equity and exchange traded fund
(``ETF'') options for the month of February 2021.\19\ The Exchange
believes that the ever-shifting market share among the exchanges from
month to month demonstrates that market participants can discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of products and services, terminate an
existing membership or determine to not become a new member, and/or
shift order flow, in response to transaction fee changes. For example,
on February 28, 2019, the Exchange filed with the Commission a proposal
to increase Taker fees in certain Tiers for options transactions in
certain Penny classes for Priority Customers and decrease Maker rebates
in certain Tiers for options transactions in Penny classes for Priority
Customers (which fee was to be effective March 1, 2019).\20\ The
Exchange experienced a decrease in total market share for the month of
March 2019, after the proposal went into effect. Accordingly, the
Exchange believes that its March 1, 2019 fee change, to increase
certain transaction fees and decrease certain transaction rebates, may
have contributed to the decrease in MIAX PEARL's market share and, as
such, the Exchange believes competitive forces constrain the
Exchange's, and other options exchanges, ability to set transaction
fees and market participants can shift order flow based on fee changes
instituted by the exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') publishes
options and futures volume in a variety of formats, including daily
and monthly volume by exchange, available here: https://www.theocc.com/market-data/volume/default.jsp.
\19\ See id.
\20\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 85304 (March 13,
2019), 84 FR 10144 (March 19, 2019) (SR-PEARL-2019-07).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes its proposal to increase Taker fees in
certain Tiers for options transactions in Penny classes for Priority
Customers, Market Makers, and Professional Members is reasonable,
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory because all similarly
situated market participants in the same Origin type are subject to the
same tiered Taker fees and access to the Exchange is offered on terms
that are not unfairly discriminatory. For competitive and business
reasons, the Exchange initially set its Taker fees for such orders
generally lower than certain other options exchanges that operate
comparable maker/taker pricing models.\21\ The Exchange now believes
that it is appropriate to increase those specified Taker fees so that
they are more in line with other exchanges, and will still remain
highly competitive such that they should enable the Exchange to
continue to attract order flow and maintain market share. The Exchange
believes for these reasons that increasing certain Taker fees for
transactions in the specified Tiers is equitable, reasonable and not
unfairly discriminatory, and thus consistent with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ See supra note 12.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposal to adopt a higher Taker fee for
certain Market Maker orders in Penny classes when trading against
Priority Customer origins in Tiers 5 and 6 when the executing buyer and
seller are not the same Member or Affiliates (versus when the executing
buyer and seller are the same Member or Affiliates) provides for the
equitable allocation of reasonable dues and fees and is not unfairly
discriminatory since the Exchange already offers certain transaction
fee discounts to Members and their Affiliates that aggregate their
order flow on these types of transactions through various pricing
structures in Section (1)(a) of the Fee Schedule.\22\ The Exchange
further believes this proposal provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues and fees and is not unfairly discriminatory since the
Exchange's affiliate, Miami International Securities Exchange, LLC
(``MIAX''), provides similar pricing structures and offers certain
transaction fee discounts to MIAX Members and their Affiliates that
aggregate their order flow on certain types of transactions through
various tier-based pricing structures.\23\ Accordingly, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory
to charge a higher Taker fee for certain Market Maker orders in Penny
classes when trading against Priority Customer origins when the
executing buyer and seller are not the same Member or Affiliates, as
other discount programs currently exist for the same Member and
Affiliates.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ See Fee Schedule, Section (1)(a).
\23\ See MIAX Fee Schedule, Sections 1(a)(i)-(ii) and Section
1(a)(iii), notes ``K'' and ``[ssbox]''.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes in the Taker fees for the applicable market
participants should continue to encourage the provision of liquidity
that enhances the quality of the Exchange's market and increases the
number of trading opportunities on the Exchange for all participants
who will be able to compete for such opportunities. The proposed rule
changes should enable the Exchange to continue to attract and compete
for order flow with other exchanges. However, this competition does not
create an undue burden on competition but rather offers all market
participants the opportunity to receive the benefit of competitive
pricing.
The proposed Taker fee adjustments are intended to keep the
Exchange's fees highly competitive with those of other exchanges, and
to encourage liquidity and should enable the Exchange to continue to
attract and compete for order flow with other exchanges. The Exchange
notes that it operates in a highly competitive market in which market
participants can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels
at a particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its rebates and fees to remain
competitive
[[Page 14656]]
with other exchanges and to attract order flow. The Exchange believes
that the proposed rule changes reflect this competitive environment
because the proposal modifies the Exchange's fees in a manner that
encourages market participants to continue to provide liquidity and to
send order flow to the Exchange.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act,\24\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \25\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such
action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether
the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\25\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-PEARL-2021-06 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2021-06. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-PEARL-2021-06 and should be submitted on
or before April 7, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-05445 Filed 3-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P