Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 3, 14482-14484 [2021-05342]
Download as PDF
14482
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 / Notices
and should be submitted on or before
April 6, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
J. Mathew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05339 Filed 3–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
[Release No. 34–91295; File No. SR–ISE–
2021–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq
ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange’s Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 3
March 10, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on March 2,
2021, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (‘‘ISE’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II,
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the
Exchange’s Pricing Schedule at Options
7, Section 3 (Regular Order Fees and
Rebates), as described further below.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on the Exchange’s website at
https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/
rulebook/ise/rules, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
16:52 Mar 15, 2021
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
VerDate Sep<11>2014
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
Jkt 253001
The purpose of the proposed rule
change is to amend the Exchange’s
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section
3 (Regular Order Fees and Rebates) to:
(i) Decrease the Priority Customer 3 taker
fee in Select Symbols,4 and (ii) increase
the Non-Priority Customer 5 maker fee
in Select Symbols.
The Exchange initially filed the
proposed pricing changes on March 1,
2021 (SR–ISE–2021–02). On March 2,
2021, the Exchange withdrew that filing
and submitted this filing.
Today, Priority Customers are charged
a taker fee of $0.41 per contract for
regular orders in Select Symbols. The
Exchange now proposes to decrease this
fee to $0.37 per contract for Priority
Customers.
Today, all Non-Priority Customers are
charged a maker fee of $0.11 per
contract for regular orders in Select
Symbols. The Exchange now proposes
to increase this fee to $0.18 per contract
for all Non-Priority Customers.6
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Act,7 in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5)
of the Act,8 in particular, in that it
provides for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among members and issuers and other
persons using any facility, and is not
designed to permit unfair
3 A ‘‘Priority Customer’’ is a person or entity that
is not a broker/dealer in securities, and does not
place more than 390 orders in listed options per day
on average during a calendar month for its own
beneficial account(s), as defined in Nasdaq ISE
Options 1, Section 1(a)(37).
4 ‘‘Select Symbols’’ are options overlying all
symbols listed on the Nasdaq ISE that are in the
Penny Interval Program.
5 ‘‘Non-Priority Customers’’ include Market
Makers, Non-Nasdaq ISE Market Makers, Firm
Proprietary/Broker Dealers, and Professional
Customers.
6 The Exchange notes that under this proposal,
Market Makers that qualify for Market Maker Plus
in Select Symbols will continue to receive the
applicable Market Maker Plus rebates in Select
Symbols set forth in note 5 of Options 7, Section
3, and will not pay the proposed $0.18 per contract
maker fee.
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
8 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
PO 00000
Frm 00080
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
The Exchange’s proposed changes to
its Pricing Schedule are reasonable in
several respects. As a threshold matter,
the Exchange is subject to significant
competitive forces in the market for
options securities transaction services
that constrain its pricing determinations
in that market. The fact that this market
is competitive has long been recognized
by the courts. In NetCoalition v.
Securities and Exchange Commission,
the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ‘‘[n]o
one disputes that competition for order
flow is ‘fierce.’ . . . As the SEC
explained, ‘[i]n the U.S. national market
system, buyers and sellers of securities,
and the broker-dealers that act as their
order-routing agents, have a wide range
of choices of where to route orders for
execution’; [and] ‘no exchange can
afford to take its market share
percentages for granted’ because ‘no
exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution
of order flow from broker
dealers’. . . .’’ 9
The Commission and the courts have
repeatedly expressed their preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, while
adopting a series of steps to improve the
current market model, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market
forces in determining prices and SRO
revenues and, also, recognized that
current regulation of the market system
‘‘has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 10
Numerous indicia demonstrate the
competitive nature of this market. For
example, clear substitutes to the
Exchange exist in the market for options
security transaction services. The
Exchange is only one of sixteen options
exchanges to which market participants
may direct their order flow. Within this
environment, market participants can
freely and often do shift their order flow
among the Exchange and competing
venues in response to changes in their
respective pricing schedules. As such,
the proposal represents a reasonable
attempt by the Exchange to increase its
liquidity and market share relative to its
competitors.
9 NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir.
2010) (quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No.
59039 (December 2, 2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782–83
(December 9, 2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2006–21)).
10 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(‘‘Regulation NMS Adopting Release’’).
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
The Exchange believes that the
proposed decrease for the Priority
Customer taker fee in Select Symbols is
reasonable, equitable, and not unfairly
discriminatory. As discussed above, this
fee will decrease from $0.41 to $0.37 per
contract for Priority Customers. The
Exchange seeks to incentivize Priority
Customer participation, in particular,
Priority Customer activity to remove
liquidity in Select Symbols, with the
proposed change. As amended, Priority
Customers will continue to be charged
the lowest taker fee in Select Symbols.11
The Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to charge Priority
Customers a lower taker fee than other
market participants as the Exchange has
historically offered lower execution fees
to Priority Customers. Furthermore,
Priority Customer order flow enhances
liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit
of all market participants by providing
more trading opportunities, which in
turn attracts Market Makers and other
market participants who may interact
with this order flow.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed increase for the Non-Priority
Customer maker fees in Select Symbols
is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory. As discussed
above, this fee will increase from $0.11
to $0.18 per contract for all Non-Priority
Customers. While the maker fee is
increasing for Non-Priority Customers,
the proposed increase is intended to
offset the cost of decreasing the Priority
Customer taker fee proposed above.
Furthermore, the Exchange notes that
the proposed maker fees remain lower
than maker fees at another options
exchange.12
The Exchange believes that the
proposed maker fees in Select Symbols
is equitable and not fairly
discriminatory because they will be
increased uniformly for all Non-Priority
Customers. Priority Customers will
continue to be assessed no maker fees in
Select Symbols under this proposal. For
the same reasons discussed above for
the proposed Priority Customer taker
fees, the Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory to continue offering a
11 Today, the Exchange charges all Non-Priority
Customers (except Market Makers) a taker fee of
$0.46 per contract in Select Symbols. Marker
Makers are currently charged a taker fee of $0.45
per contract in Select Symbols.
12 See, e.g., Nasdaq PHLX (‘‘Phlx’’) Pricing
Schedule at Options 7, Section 4, which assesses
Lead Market Makers and Market Makers an
electronic options transaction charge of $0.22 per
contract in Penny Symbols, and Professionals,
Broker-Dealers, and Firms an electronic options
transaction charge of $0.48 per contract in Penny
Symbols.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Mar 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
lower rate to Priority Customers
compared to other market participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. In terms of
intra-market competition, the Exchange
does not believe that its proposal will
place any category of market participant
at a competitive disadvantage. The
proposed Select Symbol taker fee will
be decreased for Priority Customers,
who will continue to be charged at a
lower rate than all other market
participants for removing liquidity on
the Exchange. The proposed Select
Symbol maker fee will be increased
uniformly for all Non-Priority
Customers, while Priority Customers
will continue to be assessed no fee for
adding liquidity on the Exchange. As
discussed above, the Exchange has
historically charged lower rates to
Priority Customers compared to other
market participants. The Exchange
believes that this incentivizes increased
Priority Customer order flow, which
enhances liquidity on the Exchange for
the benefit of all market participants by
providing more trading opportunities,
which in turn attracts Market Makers
and other market participants who may
interact with this order flow.
In terms of inter-market competition,
the Exchange notes that it operates in a
highly competitive market in which
market participants can readily favor
competing venues if they deem fee
levels at a particular venue to be
excessive, or rebate opportunities
available at other venues to be more
favorable. In such an environment, the
Exchange must continually adjust its
fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors
are free to modify their own fees in
response, and because market
participants may readily adjust their
order routing practices, the Exchange
believes that the degree to which fee
changes in this market may impose any
burden on competition is extremely
limited. For example, while the
Exchange is increasing the maker fees
for Non-Priority Customers in Select
Symbols under this proposal, the
Exchange does not believe this will
cause an undue burden on inter-market
competition as the proposed fees remain
lower than similar fees charged by other
options exchanges such as Phlx.
PO 00000
Frm 00081
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14483
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either
solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act 13 and Rule
19b–4(f)(2) 14 thereunder. At any time
within 60 days of the filing of the
proposed rule change, the Commission
summarily may temporarily suspend
such rule change if it appears to the
Commission that such action is: (i)
Necessary or appropriate in the public
interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
If the Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
ISE–2021–03 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2021–03. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
13 15
14 17
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16MRN1
14484
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 49 / Tuesday, March 16, 2021 / Notices
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–ISE–2021–03 and should be
submitted on or before April 6, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05342 Filed 3–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–222, OMB Control No.
3235–0233]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Upon Written Request, Copies Available
From: Securities and Exchange
Commission, Office of FOIA Services,
100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549–2736
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Extension:
Form 2–E, Report pursuant to rule 609 of
Regulation E
Notice is hereby given that, pursuant
to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
Rule 609 (17 CFR 230.609) under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) requires small business investment
companies and business development
companies that have engaged in
offerings of securities that are exempt
from registration pursuant to Regulation
E under the Securities Act of 1933 (17
CFR 230.601 to 610a) to report semiannually on Form 2–E (17 CFR 239.201)
the progress of the offering. The form
solicits information such as the dates an
offering commenced and was completed
(if completed), the number of shares
sold and still being offered, amounts
received in the offering, and expenses
and underwriting discounts incurred in
the offering. The information provided
on Form 2–E assists the staff in
monitoring the progress of the offering
and in determining whether the offering
has stayed within the limits set for an
offering exempt under Regulation E.
The Commission estimates that, on
average, approximately one respondent
submits a Form 2–E filing each year.
The Commission further estimates that
this information collection imposes an
annual burden of four hours and
imposes an annual external cost burden
of zero.
The collection of information under
Form 2–E is mandatory. The
information provided by the form will
not be kept confidential. An agency may
not conduct or sponsor, and a person is
not required to respond to, a collection
of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The public may view the background
documentation for this information
collection at the following website,
www.reginfo.gov. Comments should be
directed to: (i) Desk Officer for the
Securities and Exchange Commission,
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs, Office of Management and
Budget, Room 10102, New Executive
Office Building, Washington, DC 20503,
or by sending an email to:
Lindsay.M.Abate@omb.eop.gov; and (ii)
David Bottom, Director/Chief
Information Officer, Securities and
Exchange Commission, c/o Cynthia
Roscoe, 100 F Street NE, Washington,
DC 20549 or send an email to: PRA_
Mailbox@sec.gov. Written comments
and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
within 30 days of publication of this
notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/do/
PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection by selecting
‘‘Currently under 30-day Review—Open
for Public Comments’’ or by using the
search function.
Dated: March 11, 2021.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–05377 Filed 3–15–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
15 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:52 Mar 15, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91286; File Nos. SR–
NASDAQ–2020–081; SR–NASDAQ–2020–
082]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of
Filing of Amendments No. 1 and Order
Instituting Proceedings To Determine
Whether To Approve or Disapprove
Proposed Rule Changes, as Modified
by Amendments No. 1, To Adopt
Listing Rules Related to Board
Diversity and To Offer Certain Listed
Companies Access to a
Complimentary Board Recruiting
Solution To Help Advance Diversity on
Company Boards
March 10, 2021.
I. Introduction
On December 1, 2020, The Nasdaq
Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section
19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
adopt listing rules related to board
diversity (‘‘Board Diversity Proposal’’).
The proposed rule change was
published for comment in the Federal
Register on December 11, 2020.3 On
January 19, 2021, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,4 the Commission
designated a longer period within which
to approve the proposed rule change,
disapprove the proposed rule change, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove the proposed
rule change.5 On February 26, 2021, the
Exchange filed Amendment No. 1 to the
proposed rule change, which replaced
and superseded the proposed rule
change as originally filed.6
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90574
(December 4, 2020), 85 FR 80472 (SR–NASDAQ–
2020–081). Comments received on the Board
Diversity Proposal are available on the
Commission’s website at: https://www.sec.gov/
comments/sr-nasdaq-2020-081/
srnasdaq2020081.htm.
4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90951,
86 FR 7135 (January 26, 2021). The Commission
designated March 11, 2021 as the date by which the
Commission shall approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine whether to
disapprove, the proposed rule change.
6 In Amendment No. 1, the Exchange amended
the Board Diversity Proposal to: (1) Add a defined
term for ‘‘Two or More Races or Ethnicities’’ to
proposed Rule 5605(f)(1); (2) modify the application
of proposed Rule 5605(f) to Foreign Issuers and
clarify the scope of Exempt Companies; (3) provide
a lower diversity objective for a company with five
or fewer members on its board; (4) modify the
2 17
E:\FR\FM\16MRN1.SGM
16MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 49 (Tuesday, March 16, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14482-14484]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05342]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91295; File No. SR-ISE-2021-03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Nasdaq ISE, LLC; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
Exchange's Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 3
March 10, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on March 2, 2021, Nasdaq ISE, LLC (``ISE'' or ``Exchange'') filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and II, below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice
to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested
persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the Exchange's Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 3 (Regular Order Fees and Rebates), as described
further below.
The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/ise/rules, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public
Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of the proposed rule change is to amend the Exchange's
Pricing Schedule at Options 7, Section 3 (Regular Order Fees and
Rebates) to: (i) Decrease the Priority Customer \3\ taker fee in Select
Symbols,\4\ and (ii) increase the Non-Priority Customer \5\ maker fee
in Select Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A ``Priority Customer'' is a person or entity that is not a
broker/dealer in securities, and does not place more than 390 orders
in listed options per day on average during a calendar month for its
own beneficial account(s), as defined in Nasdaq ISE Options 1,
Section 1(a)(37).
\4\ ``Select Symbols'' are options overlying all symbols listed
on the Nasdaq ISE that are in the Penny Interval Program.
\5\ ``Non-Priority Customers'' include Market Makers, Non-Nasdaq
ISE Market Makers, Firm Proprietary/Broker Dealers, and Professional
Customers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange initially filed the proposed pricing changes on March
1, 2021 (SR-ISE-2021-02). On March 2, 2021, the Exchange withdrew that
filing and submitted this filing.
Today, Priority Customers are charged a taker fee of $0.41 per
contract for regular orders in Select Symbols. The Exchange now
proposes to decrease this fee to $0.37 per contract for Priority
Customers.
Today, all Non-Priority Customers are charged a maker fee of $0.11
per contract for regular orders in Select Symbols. The Exchange now
proposes to increase this fee to $0.18 per contract for all Non-
Priority Customers.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ The Exchange notes that under this proposal, Market Makers
that qualify for Market Maker Plus in Select Symbols will continue
to receive the applicable Market Maker Plus rebates in Select
Symbols set forth in note 5 of Options 7, Section 3, and will not
pay the proposed $0.18 per contract maker fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Act,\7\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\8\ in particular, in that it provides
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other
charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility,
and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers,
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange's proposed changes to its Pricing Schedule are
reasonable in several respects. As a threshold matter, the Exchange is
subject to significant competitive forces in the market for options
securities transaction services that constrain its pricing
determinations in that market. The fact that this market is competitive
has long been recognized by the courts. In NetCoalition v. Securities
and Exchange Commission, the D.C. Circuit stated as follows: ``[n]o one
disputes that competition for order flow is `fierce.' . . . As the SEC
explained, `[i]n the U.S. national market system, buyers and sellers of
securities, and the broker-dealers that act as their order-routing
agents, have a wide range of choices of where to route orders for
execution'; [and] `no exchange can afford to take its market share
percentages for granted' because `no exchange possesses a monopoly,
regulatory or otherwise, in the execution of order flow from broker
dealers'. . . .'' \9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ NetCoalition v. SEC, 615 F.3d 525, 539 (D.C. Cir. 2010)
(quoting Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59039 (December 2,
2008), 73 FR 74770, 74782-83 (December 9, 2008) (SR-NYSEArca-2006-
21)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Commission and the courts have repeatedly expressed their
preference for competition over regulatory intervention in determining
prices, products, and services in the securities markets. In Regulation
NMS, while adopting a series of steps to improve the current market
model, the Commission highlighted the importance of market forces in
determining prices and SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current
regulation of the market system ``has been remarkably successful in
promoting market competition in its broader forms that are most
important to investors and listed companies.'' \10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (``Regulation NMS Adopting
Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Numerous indicia demonstrate the competitive nature of this market.
For example, clear substitutes to the Exchange exist in the market for
options security transaction services. The Exchange is only one of
sixteen options exchanges to which market participants may direct their
order flow. Within this environment, market participants can freely and
often do shift their order flow among the Exchange and competing venues
in response to changes in their respective pricing schedules. As such,
the proposal represents a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to
increase its liquidity and market share relative to its competitors.
[[Page 14483]]
The Exchange believes that the proposed decrease for the Priority
Customer taker fee in Select Symbols is reasonable, equitable, and not
unfairly discriminatory. As discussed above, this fee will decrease
from $0.41 to $0.37 per contract for Priority Customers. The Exchange
seeks to incentivize Priority Customer participation, in particular,
Priority Customer activity to remove liquidity in Select Symbols, with
the proposed change. As amended, Priority Customers will continue to be
charged the lowest taker fee in Select Symbols.\11\ The Exchange
believes that it is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to charge
Priority Customers a lower taker fee than other market participants as
the Exchange has historically offered lower execution fees to Priority
Customers. Furthermore, Priority Customer order flow enhances liquidity
on the Exchange for the benefit of all market participants by providing
more trading opportunities, which in turn attracts Market Makers and
other market participants who may interact with this order flow.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Today, the Exchange charges all Non-Priority Customers
(except Market Makers) a taker fee of $0.46 per contract in Select
Symbols. Marker Makers are currently charged a taker fee of $0.45
per contract in Select Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed increase for the Non-
Priority Customer maker fees in Select Symbols is reasonable,
equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory. As discussed above, this
fee will increase from $0.11 to $0.18 per contract for all Non-Priority
Customers. While the maker fee is increasing for Non-Priority
Customers, the proposed increase is intended to offset the cost of
decreasing the Priority Customer taker fee proposed above. Furthermore,
the Exchange notes that the proposed maker fees remain lower than maker
fees at another options exchange.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See, e.g., Nasdaq PHLX (``Phlx'') Pricing Schedule at
Options 7, Section 4, which assesses Lead Market Makers and Market
Makers an electronic options transaction charge of $0.22 per
contract in Penny Symbols, and Professionals, Broker-Dealers, and
Firms an electronic options transaction charge of $0.48 per contract
in Penny Symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed maker fees in Select
Symbols is equitable and not fairly discriminatory because they will be
increased uniformly for all Non-Priority Customers. Priority Customers
will continue to be assessed no maker fees in Select Symbols under this
proposal. For the same reasons discussed above for the proposed
Priority Customer taker fees, the Exchange believes that it is
equitable and not unfairly discriminatory to continue offering a lower
rate to Priority Customers compared to other market participants.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. In terms of intra-market
competition, the Exchange does not believe that its proposal will place
any category of market participant at a competitive disadvantage. The
proposed Select Symbol taker fee will be decreased for Priority
Customers, who will continue to be charged at a lower rate than all
other market participants for removing liquidity on the Exchange. The
proposed Select Symbol maker fee will be increased uniformly for all
Non-Priority Customers, while Priority Customers will continue to be
assessed no fee for adding liquidity on the Exchange. As discussed
above, the Exchange has historically charged lower rates to Priority
Customers compared to other market participants. The Exchange believes
that this incentivizes increased Priority Customer order flow, which
enhances liquidity on the Exchange for the benefit of all market
participants by providing more trading opportunities, which in turn
attracts Market Makers and other market participants who may interact
with this order flow.
In terms of inter-market competition, the Exchange notes that it
operates in a highly competitive market in which market participants
can readily favor competing venues if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive, or rebate opportunities available at
other venues to be more favorable. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees to remain competitive with other
options exchanges. Because competitors are free to modify their own
fees in response, and because market participants may readily adjust
their order routing practices, the Exchange believes that the degree to
which fee changes in this market may impose any burden on competition
is extremely limited. For example, while the Exchange is increasing the
maker fees for Non-Priority Customers in Select Symbols under this
proposal, the Exchange does not believe this will cause an undue burden
on inter-market competition as the proposed fees remain lower than
similar fees charged by other options exchanges such as Phlx.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were either solicited or received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act \13\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(2) \14\ thereunder.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change,
the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it
appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or
appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of
investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the
Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall
institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be
approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-ISE-2021-03 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2021-03. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the
[[Page 14484]]
proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-ISE-2021-03 and should be
submitted on or before April 6, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-05342 Filed 3-15-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P