Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-2019, 14311-14313 [2021-05320]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices
Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will
apply to entries of subject merchandise
during the POR produced by companies
included in these final results of review
for which the reviewed companies did
not know that the merchandise they
sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller,
trading company, or exporter) was
destined for the United States. In such
instances, we will instruct CBP to
liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the
intermediate company(ies) involved in
the transaction.8
The final results of this administrative
review shall be the basis for the
assessment of antidumping duties on
entries of merchandise under review
and for future cash deposits of estimated
duties, where applicable. Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions
to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the
date of publication of the final results of
this review in the Federal Register. If a
timely summons is filed at the U.S.
Court of International Trade, the
assessment instructions will direct CBP
not to liquidate relevant entries until the
time for parties to file a request for a
statutory injunction has expired (i.e.,
within 90 days of publication).
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of final results
of administrative review for all
shipments of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for respondents noted
above will be the rate established in the
final results of this administrative
review, except if the rate is less than
0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis
within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(I), in which case the cash
deposit rate will be zero; (2) for
merchandise exported by producers or
exporters not covered in this
administrative review but covered in a
prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently
8 For
a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other producers or exporters
will continue to be 20.58 percent, the
all-others rate established in the LTFV
investigation.9 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)
to file a certificate regarding the
reimbursement of antidumping duties
prior to liquidation of the relevant
entries during the POR. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective orders (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notice to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.221.
Dated: February 24, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues
and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in
Rejecting Inmax Holding Company Ltd.’s
Financial Statements
Comment 2: Which Financial Statements
are the Appropriate Source for the
9 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico:
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value and Final Affirmative Determination of
Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15,
2014).
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14311
Calculation of Constructed Value (CV)
Profit and Indirect Selling Expense (ISE)
Ratios
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Adjust the CV Profit and ISE Ratios
Derived from the Financial Statements
used for CV
Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should
Allow a Profit Cap
Comment 5: Whether Commerce’s Targeted
Differential Pricing Methodology is
Unlawful
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–05304 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 23, 2020, the
Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the preliminary results of the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on
polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip (PET film) from Taiwan. The
period of review (POR) is July 1, 2018,
through June 30, 2019. We continue to
find that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation
(Nan Ya) did not make sales at less than
normal value and that Shinkong
Materials Technology Corporation
(SMTC) had no shipments of subject
merchandise during the POR.
DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 23, 2020, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results for
this administrative review.1 In the
Preliminary Results, we invited
interested parties to comment within 30
1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and
Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018–
2019, 85 FR 74673 (November 23, 2020)
(Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
14312
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices
days.2 No interested party submitted
comments or requested a hearing in this
administrative review. The current
deadline for these final results is March
23, 2021. Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the AD order
are all gauges of raw, pretreated, or
primed PET film, whether extruded or
coextruded. Excluded are metalized
films and other finished films that have
had at least one of their surfaces
modified by the application of a
performance-enhancing resinous or
inorganic layer of more than 0.00001
inches thick. Imports of polyethylene
terephthalate film, sheet, and strip are
currently classifiable in the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States
(HTSUS) under item number
3920.62.00.90. HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes. The written description of the
scope of the AD order is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
Final Results of Review
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation ......
0.00
Assessment Rates
Commerce has determined, and CBP
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries in this review, in
accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of
the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1).
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions directly to CBP no earlier
than 35 days after publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for statutory injunction has
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication). Because we calculated a
zero margin in the final results of this
review for Nan Ya, in accordance with
19 CFR 351.212 we will instruct CBP to
liquidate the appropriate entries
without regard to dumping duties.4
Cash Deposit Requirements
Because we received no comments on
the Preliminary Results, we have made
no changes to the preliminary
determination of no shipments. Based
on our analysis of U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) information
and information provided by SMTC and
its affiliate Shinkong Synthetic Fibers
Corporation (SSFC), we continue to
determine that SMTC had no shipments
of the subject merchandise during the
POR.3
As noted above, Commerce received
no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results. As there are no
changes from, or comments upon, the
Preliminary Results, Commerce finds
that there is no reason to modify its
analysis and calculations. Accordingly,
we adopt the analysis and explanation
in our Preliminary Results for the
purposes of these final results, nor have
we prepared an Issues and Decision
Memorandum to accompany this
Federal Register notice. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for
the period July 1, 2018, through June 30,
2019, for Nan Ya is as follows:
2 See
Producer/exporter
Weightedaverage
margin
(percent)
Preliminary Results.
a full discussion of this determination, see
Preliminary Results PDM.
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this
administrative review for all shipments
of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date, as provided for by section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash
deposit rate for Nan Ya will be zero, the
rate established in the final results of
this review; (2) for previously reviewed
or investigated companies not covered
in this review, the cash deposit rate will
continue to be the company-specific rate
published for the most recent period in
which that company participated; (3) if
the exporter is not a firm covered in this
or any previous review or in the original
less-than-fair-value (LTFV)
investigation, but the manufacturer is,
the cash-deposit rate will be the rate
established for the manufacturer of the
merchandise in these final results of
review or in the final results for the
most recent period in which that
manufacturer participated; and (4) if
neither the exporter nor the
manufacturer is a firm covered in this or
any previous review or the
investigation, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the all-others rate of 2.40
percent, which is the all-others rate
established by Commerce in the LTFV
3 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
4 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
investigation.5 These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to
interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with the final
results within five days of the date of
publication of the notice of final results
in the Federal Register, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, there
are no calculations to disclose here
because Commerce made no changes to
the analysis or calculations in the
Preliminary Results.6
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR
351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of
antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this
review period. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in the
Secretary’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation,
which is subject to sanction.
5 See Notice of Amended Final Determination of
Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping
Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film,
Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR
44174, 44175 (July 1, 2002), unchanged in Notice
of Amended Final Antidumping Duty
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film)
from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002); see also
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair
Value: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 35474 (May
20, 2002).
6 For disclosure of calculations made in the
Preliminary Results, see Memorandum, ‘‘Analysis
Memorandum for the Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip
from Taiwan: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan
Ya),’’ dated November 17, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: March 9, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021–05320 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–602–809]
Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products
From the Australia: Rescission of
Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2019–2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain hotrolled steel flat products (HR Steel) from
Australia covering the period of review
(POR) October 1, 2019, through
September 30, 2020, based on the timely
withdrawal of the request for review.
DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Williams, AD/CVD
Operations, Office I, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–5166.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Background
On October 1, 2020, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on HR Steel
from Australia for the period October 1,
2019, through September 30, 2020.1 On
November 2, 2020, AK Steel
Corporation, Steel Dynamics Inc., SSAB
Enterprises, LLC, Nucor Corporation,
and United States Steel Corporation (the
petitioners) timely requested an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order with respect to
BlueScope Steel, Ltd.2 Commerce
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 61926
(October 1, 2020).
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from Australia: Request for Administrative
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:36 Mar 12, 2021
Jkt 253001
received no other requests for an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order.
On December 8, 2020, pursuant to
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), we published in the
Federal Register a notice of initiation of
an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on HR Steel
from Australia with respect to
BlueScope Steel, Ltd.3 On March 3,
2021, the petitioners timely withdrew
their administrative review request for
BlueScope Steel, Ltd.4
Rescission of Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review, in whole or in
part, if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
petitioners withdrew their request for
review within 90 days of the publication
date of the Initiation Notice. No other
parties requested an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order.
Therefore, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1), we are rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping order on HR Steel from
Australia for the period October 1, 2019,
through September 30, 2020, in its
entirety.
Assessment
Commerce will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of HR Steel from Australia
during the POR at rates equal to the cash
deposit rate of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends
to issue appropriate assessment
Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated
October 30, 2020.
3 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
78990 (December 8, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
Commerce found that BlueScope Steel (AIS) Pty Ltd
and BlueScope Steel Distribution Pty Ltd are
affiliated with BlueScope Steel, Ltd, the company
for which a review was requested, as such,
Commerce initiated this review with respect to all
three companies. See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from Australia: Preliminary Determination
of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Postponement
of Final Determination, 81 FR 15241 (March 22,
2016), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum at 8; unchanged in Certain HotRolled Steel Flat Products from Australia: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value,
81FR 53406, 53407 (August 12, 2016), and
accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum.
4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Hot-Rolled Steel Flat
Products from Australia: Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty
Order,’’ dated March 3, 2021.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
14313
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of this
notice in the Federal Register.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: March 10, 2021.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2021–05297 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
Information Collection Activities;
Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; NIST Associates Information
System
The Department of Commerce will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication
of this notice. We invite the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment on proposed, and continuing
E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM
15MRN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 48 (Monday, March 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14311-14313]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05320]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-583-837]
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From
Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018-
2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 23, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce)
published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the
antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet,
and strip (PET film) from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is July 1,
2018, through June 30, 2019. We continue to find that Nan Ya Plastics
Corporation (Nan Ya) did not make sales at less than normal value and
that Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC) had no shipments
of subject merchandise during the POR.
DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD
Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-5255.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results
for this administrative review.\1\ In the Preliminary Results, we
invited interested parties to comment within 30
[[Page 14312]]
days.\2\ No interested party submitted comments or requested a hearing
in this administrative review. The current deadline for these final
results is March 23, 2021. Commerce conducted this administrative
review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended (the Act).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from
Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 85
FR 74673 (November 23, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The products covered by the AD order are all gauges of raw,
pretreated, or primed PET film, whether extruded or coextruded.
Excluded are metalized films and other finished films that have had at
least one of their surfaces modified by the application of a
performance-enhancing resinous or inorganic layer of more than 0.00001
inches thick. Imports of polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and
strip are currently classifiable in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) under item number 3920.62.00.90. HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes. The
written description of the scope of the AD order is dispositive.
Final Determination of No Shipments
Because we received no comments on the Preliminary Results, we have
made no changes to the preliminary determination of no shipments. Based
on our analysis of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) information
and information provided by SMTC and its affiliate Shinkong Synthetic
Fibers Corporation (SSFC), we continue to determine that SMTC had no
shipments of the subject merchandise during the POR.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ For a full discussion of this determination, see Preliminary
Results PDM.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Results of Review
As noted above, Commerce received no comments concerning the
Preliminary Results. As there are no changes from, or comments upon,
the Preliminary Results, Commerce finds that there is no reason to
modify its analysis and calculations. Accordingly, we adopt the
analysis and explanation in our Preliminary Results for the purposes of
these final results, nor have we prepared an Issues and Decision
Memorandum to accompany this Federal Register notice. The final
weighted-average dumping margin for the period July 1, 2018, through
June 30, 2019, for Nan Ya is as follows:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Weighted-
average
Producer/exporter margin
(percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nan Ya Plastics Corporation................................ 0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rates
Commerce has determined, and CBP shall assess, antidumping duties
on all appropriate entries in this review, in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1). Commerce intends to
issue assessment instructions directly to CBP no earlier than 35 days
after publication of the final results of this review in the Federal
Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of
International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to
liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request
for statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication). Because we calculated a zero margin in the final results
of this review for Nan Ya, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212 we will
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to
dumping duties.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the final results of this administrative review for all
shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit
rate for Nan Ya will be zero, the rate established in the final results
of this review; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies
not covered in this review, the cash deposit rate will continue to be
the company-specific rate published for the most recent period in which
that company participated; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in
this or any previous review or in the original less-than-fair-value
(LTFV) investigation, but the manufacturer is, the cash-deposit rate
will be the rate established for the manufacturer of the merchandise in
these final results of review or in the final results for the most
recent period in which that manufacturer participated; and (4) if
neither the exporter nor the manufacturer is a firm covered in this or
any previous review or the investigation, the cash-deposit rate will
continue to be the all-others rate of 2.40 percent, which is the all-
others rate established by Commerce in the LTFV investigation.\5\ These
cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR
44174, 44175 (July 1, 2002), unchanged in Notice of Amended Final
Antidumping Duty Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and
Antidumping Duty Order: Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and
Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR 46566 (July 15, 2002); see also
Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value: Polyethylene
Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) from Taiwan, 67 FR
35474 (May 20, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations
performed in connection with the final results within five days of the
date of publication of the notice of final results in the Federal
Register, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, there are no
calculations to disclose here because Commerce made no changes to the
analysis or calculations in the Preliminary Results.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For disclosure of calculations made in the Preliminary
Results, see Memorandum, ``Analysis Memorandum for the Preliminary
Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan: Nan
Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya),'' dated November 17, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reimbursement of Duties
This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction
of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO
is a violation, which is subject to sanction.
[[Page 14313]]
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: March 9, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2021-05320 Filed 3-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
