Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018-2019, 14309-14311 [2021-05304]

Download as PDF khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices d. exclusive or dominant supply of critical or essential goods and materials by or through nations that are, or may become, unfriendly or unstable; e. availability of substitutes or alternative sources for critical or essential goods and materials; f. need for research and development capacity to sustain leadership in the development of goods and materials critical or essential to semiconductor manufacturing; g. current domestic education and manufacturing workforce skills and any identified gaps, opportunities and potential best practices; h. role of transportation systems in supporting the semiconductor supply chain and risks associated with these transportation systems; i. risks posed by climate change to the availability, production, or transportation of goods and materials critical to semiconductor manufacturing. (vi) Potential impact of the failure to sustain or develop elements of the semiconductor supply chain in the United States on other key downstream capabilities, including but not limited to food resources, energy grids, public utilities, information communications technology (ICT), aerospace applications, artificial intelligence applications, 5G infrastructure, quantum computing, supercomputer development, and election security. Also, the potential impact of purchases of semi-conductor finished products by downstream customers, including volume and price, product generation and alternate inputs. (vii) Policy recommendations or suggested executive, legislative, regulatory changes, or actions to ensure a resilient supply chain for semiconductors (e.g., reshoring, nearshoring, or developing domestic suppliers, cooperation with allies to identify or develop alternative supply chains, building redundancy into supply chains, ways to address risks due to vulnerabilities in digital products or climate change). (viii) Any additional comments relevant to the assessment of the semiconductor manufacturing and advanced packing supply chains required by E.O. 14017. Commerce encourages commenters, when addressing the elements above, to structure their comments using the same text as identifiers for the areas of inquiry to which their comments respond to assist Commerce in more easily reviewing and summarizing the comments received in response to these specific comment areas. For example, a commenter submitting comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Mar 12, 2021 Jkt 253001 responsive to (i) critical and essential goods and materials underlying the semiconductor supply chain, would use that same text as a heading in the public comment followed by the commenter’s specific comments in this area. Requirements for Written Comments The http://www.regulations.gov website allows users to provide comments by filling in a ‘‘Type Comment’’ field, or by attaching a document using an ‘‘Upload File’’ field. The Department prefers that comments be provided in an attached document. The Department prefers submissions in Microsoft Word (.doc files) or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf files). If the submission is in an application format other than Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat, please indicate the name of the application in the ‘‘Type Comment’’ field. Please do not attach separate cover letters to electronic submissions; rather, include any information that might appear in a cover letter within the comments. Similarly, to the extent possible, please include any exhibits, annexes, or other attachments in the same file, so that the submission consists of one file instead of multiple files. Comments (both public comments and non-confidential versions of comments containing business confidential information) will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection. Comments may be viewed on http://www.regulations.gov by entering docket number BIS–2021–0011 in the search field on the home page. All filers should name their files using the name of the person or entity submitting the comments. Anonymous comments are also accepted. Communications from agencies of the United States Government will not be made available for public inspection. Anyone submitting business confidential information should clearly identify the business confidential portion at the time of submission, file a statement justifying nondisclosure and referring to the specific legal authority claimed, and provide a non-confidential version of the submission. The nonconfidential version of the submission will be placed in the public file on http://www.regulations.gov. For comments submitted electronically containing business confidential information, the file name of the business confidential version should begin with the characters ‘‘BC’’. Any page containing business confidential information must be clearly marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ on the top of that page. The non-confidential version must be clearly marked ‘‘PUBLIC’’. The file name of the non- PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14309 confidential version should begin with the character ‘‘P’’. The ‘‘BC’’ and ‘‘P’’ should be followed by the name of the person or entity submitting the comments or rebuttal comments. If a public hearing is held in support of this assessment, a separate Federal Register notice will be published providing the date and information about the hearing. The Bureau of Industry and Security does not maintain a separate public inspection facility. Requesters should first view the Bureau’s web page, which can be found at https:// efoia.bis.doc.gov/ (see ‘‘Electronic FOIA’’ heading). If requesters cannot access the website, they may call 202– 482–0795 for assistance. The records related to this assessment are made accessible in accordance with the regulations published in part 4 of title 15 of the Code of Federal Regulations (15 CFR 4.1 through 4.11). Matthew S. Borman, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Export Administration. [FR Doc. 2021–05353 Filed 3–11–21; 2:00 pm] BILLING CODE 3510–33–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–523–808] Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain steel nails (steel nails) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) were not sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period of review (POR), July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0223. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On September 30, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of the 2018–2019 antidumping duty (AD) administrative review of steel nails from E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1 14310 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Final Determination of No Shipments appropriate entries of subject In the Preliminary Results, Commerce merchandise in accordance with the determined that Astrotech Steels Private final results of this review. We intend to calculate importer- (or Ltd. (Astrotech), Geekay Wires Limited customer-) specific assessment rates on (Geekay), and Trinity Steel Private Limited (Trinity) made no shipments of the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping duties calculated for the subject merchandise during the each importer’s (or customer’s) POR. As we have not received any examined sales and the total entered information to contradict our value of the sales in accordance with 19 preliminary finding, we find that CFR 351.212(b)(1). Where an importerAstrotech, Geekay, and Trinity did not (or customer-) specific rate is zero or de have any shipments of subject minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR merchandise during the POR and we 351.106(c)(1), we will instruct CBP to will issue appropriate instructions to liquidate the appropriate entries U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on these final results of this without regard to antidumping duties. Generally, when calculating margins review. Scope of the Order for non-selected respondents, Changes Since the Preliminary Results Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of The products covered by this order the Act for guidance, which provides Based on our review of the record and are steel nails from Oman. For a full instructions for calculating the allcomments received from interested description of the scope of the order, see others margin in an investigation. parties, we made the following changes the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides to the Preliminary Results: that when calculating the all-others • We recalculated the constructed Analysis of Comments Received value (CV) financial ratios for profit and margin, Commerce will exclude any All issues raised in the case and zero and de minimis weighted-average indirect selling expenses (ISEs) by rebuttal briefs are addressed in the removing a financial statement from the dumping margins, as well as any Issues and Decision Memorandum. A weighted-average dumping margins preliminary calculation.5 list of the issues that parties raised and • We recalculated certain companies’ based on total facts available. Accordingly, Commerce’s usual practice to which we responded in the Issues financial ratios which entailed a has been to average the margins for and Decision Memorandum is attached recalculation of the overall CV profit selected respondents, excluding margins to this notice as an Appendix. The and ISE ratios.6 that are zero, de minimis, or based Issues and Decision Memorandum is a Final Results of the Review entirely on facts available. public document and is on file We have determined the following In this review, we calculated a electronically via Enforcement and weighted-average dumping margin weighted-average dumping margin of Compliance’s Antidumping and applies to the producers/exporters listed 0.00 percent for the only respondent in Countervailing Duty Centralized below for the period July 1, 2018, this review, i.e., Oman Fasteners. In Electronic Service System (ACCESS). through June 30, 2019: accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of ACCESS is available to registered users the Act, Commerce assigned Oman at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a Estimated Fasteners’ weighted-average margin, complete version of the Issues and weighted- 0.00 percent, to the non-selected Decision Memorandum can be accessed average Exporter/producer companies in these final results. The dumping directly at http://enforcement.trade.gov/ rate calculated for the non-selected margin frn/index.html/. The signed and (percent) companies is a weighted-average electronic versions of the Issues and percentage margin which is calculated Decision Memorandum are identical in Oman Fasteners LLC ................. 0.00 based on the U.S. value of Oman content. Al Kiyumi Global LLC ................. 0.00 Fasteners, the only respondent Modern Factory for Metal Prod1 See Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of ucts .......................................... 0.00 reviewed, with an affirmative AD WWL India Private Ltd ............... 0.00 margin.7 Accordingly, we have applied Oman: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty a rate of 0.00 percent to the non-selected Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No-Shipments; 2018–2019, 85 FR companies. Disclosure and Public Comment 61720 (September 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), Further, because we find in these final and accompanying Preliminary Decisions We intend to disclose the calculations results that Astrotech, Geekay, and Memorandum. performed to parties in this proceeding 2 This review covers the following companies: Trinity had no shipments of subject within five days after publication of Oman Fasteners LLC, Al Kiyumi Global LLC, merchandise during the POR, we will Modern Factory for Metal Products, and WWL India these final results in the Federal instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended Private Ltd. Register, in accordance with section entries that entered under its AD case 3 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘2018–2019 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(b). number (i.e., at the exporter’s rate) or at Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of the all-others rate if there is no rate for Assessment Rates Oman: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the the intermediate company(ies) involved Antidumping Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated in the transaction. January 8, 2021. Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Commerce shall determine, and CBP 7 See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2018– shall assess, antidumping duties on all Oman.1 This administrative review covers four producers and/or exporters of the subject merchandise.2 Commerce selected Oman Fasteners LLC (Oman Fasteners) for individual examination. The producers/exporters not selected for individual examination are listed in the ‘‘Final Results of the Review’’ section of this notice. On January 8, 2021, Commerce extended the due date for issuing the final results of this review by 28 days, until February 25, 2021.3 For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.4 2019 Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of Oman,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Mar 12, 2021 Jkt 253001 5 See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2. 6 Id. at Comment 3. PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of ChangedCircumstances Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 (September 1, 2010). E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 48 / Monday, March 15, 2021 / Notices Commerce’s ‘‘reseller policy’’ will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the allothers rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.8 The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise under review and for future cash deposits of estimated duties, where applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 days of publication). khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final results of this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this administrative review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(I), in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the producer is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently 8 For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:36 Mar 12, 2021 Jkt 253001 completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the all-others rate established in the LTFV investigation.9 These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notice to Interested Parties We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221. Dated: February 24, 2021. Christian Marsh, Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results V. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in Rejecting Inmax Holding Company Ltd.’s Financial Statements Comment 2: Which Financial Statements are the Appropriate Source for the 9 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 2014). PO 00000 Frm 00011 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 14311 Calculation of Constructed Value (CV) Profit and Indirect Selling Expense (ISE) Ratios Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the CV Profit and ISE Ratios Derived from the Financial Statements used for CV Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Allow a Profit Cap Comment 5: Whether Commerce’s Targeted Differential Pricing Methodology is Unlawful VI. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2021–05304 Filed 3–12–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–583–837] Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip (PET Film) From Taiwan: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018– 2019 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 23, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from Taiwan. The period of review (POR) is July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019. We continue to find that Nan Ya Plastics Corporation (Nan Ya) did not make sales at less than normal value and that Shinkong Materials Technology Corporation (SMTC) had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Arrowsmith, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5255. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background On November 23, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results for this administrative review.1 In the Preliminary Results, we invited interested parties to comment within 30 1 See Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip from Taiwan: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2018– 2019, 85 FR 74673 (November 23, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). E:\FR\FM\15MRN1.SGM 15MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 48 (Monday, March 15, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 14309-14311]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-05304]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-523-808]


Certain Steel Nails From the Sultanate of Oman: Final Results of 
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No 
Shipments; 2018-2019

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that certain 
steel nails (steel nails) from the Sultanate of Oman (Oman) were not 
sold in the United States at less than normal value during the period 
of review (POR), July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2019.

DATES: Applicable March 15, 2021.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dakota Potts, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0223.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On September 30, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results 
of the 2018-2019 antidumping duty (AD) administrative review of steel 
nails from

[[Page 14310]]

Oman.\1\ This administrative review covers four producers and/or 
exporters of the subject merchandise.\2\ Commerce selected Oman 
Fasteners LLC (Oman Fasteners) for individual examination. The 
producers/exporters not selected for individual examination are listed 
in the ``Final Results of the Review'' section of this notice. On 
January 8, 2021, Commerce extended the due date for issuing the final 
results of this review by 28 days, until February 25, 2021.\3\ For a 
complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary 
Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of Oman: 
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and 
Preliminary Determination of No-Shipments; 2018-2019, 85 FR 61720 
(September 30, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying 
Preliminary Decisions Memorandum.
    \2\ This review covers the following companies: Oman Fasteners 
LLC, Al Kiyumi Global LLC, Modern Factory for Metal Products, and 
WWL India Private Ltd.
    \3\ See Commerce's Letter, ``2018-2019 Administrative Review of 
the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate 
of Oman: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review,'' dated January 8, 2021.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the 2018-2019 Administrative Review of the 
Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Steel Nails from the Sultanate of 
Oman,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice 
(Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are steel nails from Oman. For a 
full description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues that parties 
raised and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
is attached to this notice as an Appendix. The Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via 
Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html/. The signed and 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Final Determination of No Shipments

    In the Preliminary Results, Commerce determined that Astrotech 
Steels Private Ltd. (Astrotech), Geekay Wires Limited (Geekay), and 
Trinity Steel Private Limited (Trinity) made no shipments of the 
subject merchandise during the POR. As we have not received any 
information to contradict our preliminary finding, we find that 
Astrotech, Geekay, and Trinity did not have any shipments of subject 
merchandise during the POR and we will issue appropriate instructions 
to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) based on these final 
results of this review.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our review of the record and comments received from 
interested parties, we made the following changes to the Preliminary 
Results:
     We recalculated the constructed value (CV) financial 
ratios for profit and indirect selling expenses (ISEs) by removing a 
financial statement from the preliminary calculation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Issues and Decision Memorandum at Comment 2.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     We recalculated certain companies' financial ratios which 
entailed a recalculation of the overall CV profit and ISE ratios.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ Id. at Comment 3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Final Results of the Review

    We have determined the following weighted-average dumping margin 
applies to the producers/exporters listed below for the period July 1, 
2018, through June 30, 2019:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Estimated
                                                               weighted-
                                                                average
                      Exporter/producer                         dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oman Fasteners LLC..........................................        0.00
Al Kiyumi Global LLC........................................        0.00
Modern Factory for Metal Products...........................        0.00
WWL India Private Ltd.......................................        0.00
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure and Public Comment

    We intend to disclose the calculations performed to parties in this 
proceeding within five days after publication of these final results in 
the Federal Register, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 
19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rates

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce shall determine, and CBP shall assess, 
antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in 
accordance with the final results of this review.
    We intend to calculate importer- (or customer-) specific assessment 
rates on the basis of the ratio of the total amount of antidumping 
duties calculated for each importer's (or customer's) examined sales 
and the total entered value of the sales in accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1). Where an importer- (or customer-) specific rate is zero 
or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), we will 
instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to 
antidumping duties.
    Generally, when calculating margins for non-selected respondents, 
Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of the Act for guidance, which 
provides instructions for calculating the all-others margin in an 
investigation. Section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act provides that when 
calculating the all-others margin, Commerce will exclude any zero and 
de minimis weighted-average dumping margins, as well as any weighted-
average dumping margins based on total facts available. Accordingly, 
Commerce's usual practice has been to average the margins for selected 
respondents, excluding margins that are zero, de minimis, or based 
entirely on facts available.
    In this review, we calculated a weighted-average dumping margin of 
0.00 percent for the only respondent in this review, i.e., Oman 
Fasteners. In accordance with section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, Commerce 
assigned Oman Fasteners' weighted-average margin, 0.00 percent, to the 
non-selected companies in these final results. The rate calculated for 
the non-selected companies is a weighted-average percentage margin 
which is calculated based on the U.S. value of Oman Fasteners, the only 
respondent reviewed, with an affirmative AD margin.\7\ Accordingly, we 
have applied a rate of 0.00 percent to the non-selected companies.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Ball Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 
Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results of Antidumping 
Duty Administrative Reviews, Final Results of Changed-Circumstances 
Review, and Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 
(September 1, 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Further, because we find in these final results that Astrotech, 
Geekay, and Trinity had no shipments of subject merchandise during the 
POR, we will instruct CBP to liquidate any suspended entries that 
entered under its AD case number (i.e., at the exporter's rate) or at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.

[[Page 14311]]

    Commerce's ``reseller policy'' will apply to entries of subject 
merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these 
final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know 
that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, 
trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In 
such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at 
the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The final results of this administrative review shall be the basis 
for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise 
under review and for future cash deposits of estimated duties, where 
applicable. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no 
earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results 
of this review in the Federal Register. If a timely summons is filed at 
the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will 
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties 
to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired (i.e., within 
90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of the notice of final results of administrative review for 
all shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication of the final 
results of this administrative review, as provided by section 
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for respondents 
noted above will be the rate established in the final results of this 
administrative review, except if the rate is less than 0.50 percent 
and, therefore, de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(I), 
in which case the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for merchandise 
exported by producers or exporters not covered in this administrative 
review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review, a prior review, or the 
original less-than-fair-value (LTFV) investigation, but the producer 
is, the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most 
recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the 
subject merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 
producers or exporters will continue to be 20.58 percent, the all-
others rate established in the LTFV investigation.\9\ These cash 
deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from Mexico: Final 
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Final Affirmative 
Determination of Critical Circumstances, 79 FR 54967 (September 15, 
2014).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during the POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that reimbursement 
of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled 
antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction 
of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an 
APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notice to Interested Parties

    We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221.

    Dated: February 24, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Final Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Whether Commerce Erred in Rejecting Inmax Holding 
Company Ltd.'s Financial Statements
    Comment 2: Which Financial Statements are the Appropriate Source 
for the Calculation of Constructed Value (CV) Profit and Indirect 
Selling Expense (ISE) Ratios
    Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Adjust the CV Profit and ISE 
Ratios Derived from the Financial Statements used for CV
    Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should Allow a Profit Cap
    Comment 5: Whether Commerce's Targeted Differential Pricing 
Methodology is Unlawful
VI. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2021-05304 Filed 3-12-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P