Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend Its Fees Schedule, 13776-13778 [2021-04913]
Download as PDF
13776
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 10, 2021 / Notices
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, pursuant to
delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
[FR Doc. 2021–04934 Filed 3–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
1. Purpose
[Release No. 34–91259; File No. SR–CBOE–
2021–014]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change Relating To Amend Its
Fees Schedule
March 4, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
25, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the Exchange.
The Commission is publishing this
notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested
persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’
or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend
its fees schedule. The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/
AboutCBOE/CBOELegal
RegulatoryHome.aspx), at the
Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Exchange proposes to amend its
COVID–19 Test Fee which it recently
adopted in connection with the COVID–
19 pandemic. By way of background, on
March 16, 2020, the Exchange
suspended open outcry trading to help
prevent the spread of COVID–19 3 and
was operating in an all-electronic
configuration until June 15, 2020. On
June 15, 2020, the Exchange reopened
its trading floor, but with a modified
configuration of trading crowds in order
to implement social distancing and
other measures consistent with local
and state health and safety guidelines to
help protect the safety and welfare of
individuals accessing the trading floor.
In order to further protect the safety and
welfare of individuals accessing the
trading floor during the COVID–19
pandemic, the Exchange determined to
implement on-site COVID–19 testing for
all trading floor personnel, beginning
November 16, 2020. The Exchange has
contracted with an independent health
care provider who conducts the tests,
which the Exchange currently conducts
twice each week. The Exchange
currently assesses a fee of $150 per test,
per Trading Permit Holder (‘‘TPH’’) or
associated person of a TPH 4 that is
tested, which is the same amount the
Exchange is charged by the independent
health care provider conducting the
tests (i.e., the Exchange passes through
its costs). The COVID–19 Test Fee
allows the Exchange to offset the costs
incurred with on-site testing.
The Exchange wishes to amend the
language in the Fees Schedule to
provide generally that the Exchange will
pass through the cost the Exchange is
charged for each test, instead of
specifying the exact amount (currently
$150) in the Fees Schedule. In adopting
the COVID–19 Test Fee, the Exchange
represented that the proposed fee is a
3 On March 11, 2020, the World Health
Organization characterized COVID–19 as a
pandemic and to slow the spread of the disease,
federal and state officials implemented socialdistancing measures, placed significant limitations
on large gatherings, limited travel, and closed nonessential businesses.
4 For example, a TPH may have personnel other
than Nominees on the floor that need to access the
trading floor. Such persons will also be subject to
testing requirements and will be assessed the
proposed fee.
PO 00000
Frm 00091
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
pass-through of the costs to the
Exchange and that the Exchange will
not generate any revenue in excess of
those costs.5 Although the Exchange is
currently still subject to the $150 rate
(which it will continue to pass through),
the proposed change provides flexibility
should the rate change in the future. For
example, if the independent health care
provider lowers the rate they charge the
Exchange for each test (e.g., lowers from
$150 to $100), the Exchange can charge
$100 per test, per TPH and associated
person of a TPH, without having to
submit an additional rule filing. The
Exchange represents that it will
continue to ensure it does not generate
any revenue in excess of its costs
associated with the tests. The Exchange
also does not anticipate the cost
exceeding the current rate of $150.
The Exchange next proposes to
provide that in certain limited
circumstances, the Exchange will waive
the costs of the test in its entirety,
regardless of the cost to the Exchange.
Particularly, the Exchange proposes to
provide that it will not assess any fees,
regardless of the cost to the Exchange,
when test results are not received from
the independent health care provider
that conducts the tests in a timely
manner. The Exchange notes the testing
process is rolling and intended to
capture any potential positive COVID
cases. Accordingly, the Exchange does
not believe it’s appropriate or equitable
to assess the fee if results are delivered
past the time such results can no longer
be utilized by the Exchange for its
intended purpose.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.6 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 7 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
5 See Securities Exchange Release No. 90504
(November 24, 2020) 85 FR 77295 (December 1,
2020) (SR–CBOE–2020–111).
6 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 10, 2021 / Notices
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(4) of the Act,8 which
requires that Exchange rules provide for
the equitable allocation of reasonable
dues, fees, and other charges among its
Trading Permit Holders and other
persons using its facilities.
The Exchange believes the proposed
change to the COVID–19 Test Fee is
reasonable as the Exchange will
continue to pass through the costs that
the Exchange incurs per test. Indeed, the
proposed change to replace the
reference to the specific amount
currently being passed through with
general language providing the COVID–
19 Test Fee is a pass-through of the
Exchange’s costs, merely provides the
Exchange more flexibility to adapt to
changing rates and avoids the
administrative burden of submitting an
additional rule filing each time the rate
changes. As noted above, the Exchange
does not currently anticipate that the
COVD–19 Test Fee would increase
above the current rate of $150 per test,
per TPH/associated person of a TPH.
The fee the Exchange ultimately
assesses to TPHs and associated persons
of a TPH will always be the same
amount that is assessed to the Exchange
by the independent health care provider
administering the tests. Also as noted
above, the revenue generated from the
proposed fee will continue to not be
more than the cost to the Exchange for
administering the tests. The Exchange
further notes that to date, it has
absorbed all other costs incurred in
connection with the safety and health
protocols it has taken to ensure the
safety and welfare of individuals access
the trading floor, including daily deepcleaning of its facilities. The Exchange
believes the proposed change is
equitable and not unfairly
discriminatory because it applies
uniformly to any TPH or associated
person of a TPH that is tested and
accesses the trading floor.
The Exchange believes the proposal to
waive the fee in instances where the
results of a test are not received in a
timely manner by the Exchange from the
independent health care provider is
reasonable because TPHs and associated
persons of TPHs will not be subject to
a fee in such cases. The Exchange
recognizes there may be unforeseen
circumstances which may cause a delay
of test results to be received (e.g.,
inclement weather). In such cases, the
Exchange does not believe it’s equitable
or appropriate to continue to assess the
COVID–19 Test Fee for impacted tests as
the Exchange would not be able to
utilize the results as intended. Lastly,
the Exchange believes the proposed
change to waive the fee when test
results are delayed is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the
waiver will be applied to any TPH or
associated person of a TPH that is
impacted by such delay.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule changes will impose
any burden on competition that are not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange notes the proposed change is
not intended to address any competitive
issue. Rather, the proposed changes
relate to a pass-through fee that allows
the Exchange to continue to recoup
costs associated with COVID–19 testing
in order to help protect the safety and
welfare of individuals access the trading
floor. The Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on intramarket
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the
proposed changes apply equally to all
similarly situated market participants.
The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule changes will impose any
burden on intermarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because the proposed changes only
affect trading on the Exchange in
limited circumstances.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 9 and paragraph (f) of Rule
19b–4 10 thereunder. At any time within
60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
9 15
8 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 09, 2021
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f).
10 17
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00092
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
13777
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2021–014 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2021–014. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2021–014 and
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
13778
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 45 / Wednesday, March 10, 2021 / Notices
should be submitted on or before March
31, 2021.
instruction.7 The text of the proposed
rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.11
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
[FR Doc. 2021–04913 Filed 3–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91256; File No. SR–MEMX–
2021–03]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; MEMX
LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate
Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule
Change To Amend Exchange Rule
11.6(h)(1) To Enable Users To Include
a Limit Price on a Pegged Order With
a Primary Peg Instruction
March 4, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on February
24, 2021, MEMX LLC (‘‘MEMX’’ or the
‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the
proposal as a ‘‘non-controversial’’
proposed rule change pursuant to
Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange is filing with the
Commission a proposed rule change to
amend Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(1) to
enable Users 5 to include a limit price
on a Pegged Order 6 with a Primary Peg
11 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 As defined in Exchange Rule 1.5(jj), a ‘‘User’’ is
a member of the Exchange (‘‘Member’’) or
sponsored participant of a Member who is
authorized to obtain access to the System pursuant
to Exchange Rule 11.3. As defined in Exchange Rule
1.5(gg), the Exchange’s ‘‘System’’ is the electronic
communications and trading facility designated by
the Board through which securities orders of Users
are consolidated for ranking, execution and, when
applicable, routing.
6 Pegged Orders are described in Exchange Rules
11.6(h) and 11.8(c) and generally defined as an
order that is pegged to a reference price and
1 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:22 Mar 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Currently, Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(1)
provides that a User submitting a
Pegged Order with a Primary Peg
instruction may not include a limit
price on such order.8 In contrast,
Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(2) provides that
a User submitting a Pegged Order with
a Midpoint Peg instruction may, but is
not required to, include a limit price on
such order. The Exchange therefore
currently has different functionality
with respect to a User’s ability to
include a limit price on a Pegged Order
with a Primary Peg instruction and a
Pegged Order with a Midpoint Peg
automatically re-prices in response to changes in
the NBBO. The two types of peg instructions for
Pegged Orders are: (1) Primary Peg, which pegs to
the NBB (NBO) for buy (sell) orders; and (2)
Midpoint Peg, which pegs to the midpoint of the
NBBO.
7 A Primary Peg instruction is an instruction that
may be placed on a Pegged Order that instructs the
Exchange to peg the order to the NBB, for a buy
order, or the NBO, for a sell order. A User may, but
is not required to, select an offset equal to or greater
than $0.01 above or below the NBB or NBO that the
order is pegged to. See Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(1).
8 As initially adopted, Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(1)
was silent as to whether a User submitting a Pegged
Order with a Primary Peg instruction may include
a limit price on such order. The Exchange
interpreted the Rule’s silence in this regard to mean
that a limit price may not be included on such
orders, which was the intended functionality for
such orders at the time of the Exchange’s initial
launch. However, after receiving inquiries from
Users as to whether a limit price may be included
on such orders, prior to commencing operations the
Exchange adopted a change to Exchange Rule
11.6(h)(1) to expressly state that a User submitting
a Pegged Order with a Primary Peg instruction may
not include a limit price on such order. The
purpose of this change was therefore to make
Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(1) more clearly reflect the
intended and actual functionality. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 89581 (August 17, 2020),
85 FR 51799 (August 21, 2020) (SR–MEMX–2020–
04).
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
instruction in that Users may only
include a limit price on the latter.
The Exchange now proposes to enable
a User submitting a Pegged Order with
a Primary Peg instruction to include a
limit price on such order. The purpose
of the proposed change is to align the
functionality with respect to a User’s
ability to include a limit price for the
two types of peg instructions for Pegged
Orders (i.e., Primary Peg and Midpoint
Peg), as the Exchange believes there
should be no distinction with respect to
this functionality for such orders. Thus,
the language of the proposed change is
based on and mirrors the relevant
language applicable to Pegged Orders
with a Midpoint Peg instruction set
forth in Exchange Rule 11.6(h)(2) and,
accordingly, provides that a User
submitting a Pegged Order with a
Primary Peg instruction may, but is not
required to, include a limit price on
such order.
The Exchange notes that by enabling
a User to include a limit price on a
Pegged Order with a Primary Peg
instruction, the User is able to establish
an additional risk protection in the form
of a specified price limitation, which
the Exchange believes would help to
minimize the risk of executions of such
orders at unintended price levels,
thereby promoting the operation of a fair
and orderly market. Accordingly, as
Users would have greater flexibility in
establishing a price limitation with
respect to such orders, the Exchange
believes that the proposed change
would result in Users sending
additional Pegged Orders with a
Primary Peg instruction to the
Exchange, which would deepen the
liquidity on the Exchange to the benefit
of all Users. The Exchange also notes
that the proposed change to enable
Users to include a limit price on a
Pegged Order with a Primary Peg
instruction is consistent with the
existing functionality of other
exchanges.9
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,10 which
requires, among other things, that the
Exchange’s rules must be designed to
9 See, e.g., Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (‘‘EDGX’’)
Rule 11.8(b)(9), which provides that pegged
functionality (including a primary peg instruction
similar to the Exchange’s Primary Peg instruction)
is available for limit orders that are posted to the
EDGX book; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
(‘‘Nasdaq’’) Rule 4703(d), which generally permits
an order with pegging (including primary pegging
similar to the Exchange’s Primary Peg instruction)
to specify a limit price beyond which the order may
not be executed.
10 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM
10MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 45 (Wednesday, March 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 13776-13778]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04913]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91259; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-014]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating
To Amend Its Fees Schedule
March 4, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on February 25, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``Cboe Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe Options'') proposes
to amend its fees schedule. The text of the proposed rule change is
provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend its COVID-19 Test Fee which it
recently adopted in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic. By way of
background, on March 16, 2020, the Exchange suspended open outcry
trading to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 \3\ and was operating in
an all-electronic configuration until June 15, 2020. On June 15, 2020,
the Exchange reopened its trading floor, but with a modified
configuration of trading crowds in order to implement social distancing
and other measures consistent with local and state health and safety
guidelines to help protect the safety and welfare of individuals
accessing the trading floor. In order to further protect the safety and
welfare of individuals accessing the trading floor during the COVID-19
pandemic, the Exchange determined to implement on-site COVID-19 testing
for all trading floor personnel, beginning November 16, 2020. The
Exchange has contracted with an independent health care provider who
conducts the tests, which the Exchange currently conducts twice each
week. The Exchange currently assesses a fee of $150 per test, per
Trading Permit Holder (``TPH'') or associated person of a TPH \4\ that
is tested, which is the same amount the Exchange is charged by the
independent health care provider conducting the tests (i.e., the
Exchange passes through its costs). The COVID-19 Test Fee allows the
Exchange to offset the costs incurred with on-site testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization
characterized COVID-19 as a pandemic and to slow the spread of the
disease, federal and state officials implemented social-distancing
measures, placed significant limitations on large gatherings,
limited travel, and closed non-essential businesses.
\4\ For example, a TPH may have personnel other than Nominees on
the floor that need to access the trading floor. Such persons will
also be subject to testing requirements and will be assessed the
proposed fee.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange wishes to amend the language in the Fees Schedule to
provide generally that the Exchange will pass through the cost the
Exchange is charged for each test, instead of specifying the exact
amount (currently $150) in the Fees Schedule. In adopting the COVID-19
Test Fee, the Exchange represented that the proposed fee is a pass-
through of the costs to the Exchange and that the Exchange will not
generate any revenue in excess of those costs.\5\ Although the Exchange
is currently still subject to the $150 rate (which it will continue to
pass through), the proposed change provides flexibility should the rate
change in the future. For example, if the independent health care
provider lowers the rate they charge the Exchange for each test (e.g.,
lowers from $150 to $100), the Exchange can charge $100 per test, per
TPH and associated person of a TPH, without having to submit an
additional rule filing. The Exchange represents that it will continue
to ensure it does not generate any revenue in excess of its costs
associated with the tests. The Exchange also does not anticipate the
cost exceeding the current rate of $150.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Securities Exchange Release No. 90504 (November 24,
2020) 85 FR 77295 (December 1, 2020) (SR-CBOE-2020-111).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange next proposes to provide that in certain limited
circumstances, the Exchange will waive the costs of the test in its
entirety, regardless of the cost to the Exchange. Particularly, the
Exchange proposes to provide that it will not assess any fees,
regardless of the cost to the Exchange, when test results are not
received from the independent health care provider that conducts the
tests in a timely manner. The Exchange notes the testing process is
rolling and intended to capture any potential positive COVID cases.
Accordingly, the Exchange does not believe it's appropriate or
equitable to assess the fee if results are delivered past the time such
results can no longer be utilized by the Exchange for its intended
purpose.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\6\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \7\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and
[[Page 13777]]
open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,\8\ which requires that Exchange rules provide for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and other charges among its
Trading Permit Holders and other persons using its facilities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\8\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed change to the COVID-19 Test Fee
is reasonable as the Exchange will continue to pass through the costs
that the Exchange incurs per test. Indeed, the proposed change to
replace the reference to the specific amount currently being passed
through with general language providing the COVID-19 Test Fee is a
pass-through of the Exchange's costs, merely provides the Exchange more
flexibility to adapt to changing rates and avoids the administrative
burden of submitting an additional rule filing each time the rate
changes. As noted above, the Exchange does not currently anticipate
that the COVD-19 Test Fee would increase above the current rate of $150
per test, per TPH/associated person of a TPH. The fee the Exchange
ultimately assesses to TPHs and associated persons of a TPH will always
be the same amount that is assessed to the Exchange by the independent
health care provider administering the tests. Also as noted above, the
revenue generated from the proposed fee will continue to not be more
than the cost to the Exchange for administering the tests. The Exchange
further notes that to date, it has absorbed all other costs incurred in
connection with the safety and health protocols it has taken to ensure
the safety and welfare of individuals access the trading floor,
including daily deep-cleaning of its facilities. The Exchange believes
the proposed change is equitable and not unfairly discriminatory
because it applies uniformly to any TPH or associated person of a TPH
that is tested and accesses the trading floor.
The Exchange believes the proposal to waive the fee in instances
where the results of a test are not received in a timely manner by the
Exchange from the independent health care provider is reasonable
because TPHs and associated persons of TPHs will not be subject to a
fee in such cases. The Exchange recognizes there may be unforeseen
circumstances which may cause a delay of test results to be received
(e.g., inclement weather). In such cases, the Exchange does not believe
it's equitable or appropriate to continue to assess the COVID-19 Test
Fee for impacted tests as the Exchange would not be able to utilize the
results as intended. Lastly, the Exchange believes the proposed change
to waive the fee when test results are delayed is equitable and not
unfairly discriminatory because the waiver will be applied to any TPH
or associated person of a TPH that is impacted by such delay.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule changes will
impose any burden on competition that are not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange notes the
proposed change is not intended to address any competitive issue.
Rather, the proposed changes relate to a pass-through fee that allows
the Exchange to continue to recoup costs associated with COVID-19
testing in order to help protect the safety and welfare of individuals
access the trading floor. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any burden on intramarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act because the proposed changes apply equally to all similarly
situated market participants. The Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule changes will impose any burden on intermarket competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of
the Act because the proposed changes only affect trading on the
Exchange in limited circumstances.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \9\ and paragraph (f) of Rule 19b-4 \10\
thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed
rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-014 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-014. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-014 and
[[Page 13778]]
should be submitted on or before March 31, 2021.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\11\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04913 Filed 3-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P