Lewis Family Advisors, LLC, 12253-12254 [2021-04215]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices
• The incorporating SRO has
reasonable procedures in place to
provide written notice to its members
each time a change is proposed to the
incorporated rules of another SRO.31
The Commission believes that the
Exchange has satisfied each of these
conditions. Further, the Commission
also believes that granting the Exchange
an exemption from the rule filing
requirements under Section 19(b) of the
Exchange Act will promote efficient use
of the Commission’s and the Exchange’s
resources by avoiding duplicative rule
filings based on simultaneous changes
to identical rule text sought by more
than one SRO. The Commission
therefore finds it appropriate in the
public interest and consistent with the
protection of investors to exempt the
Exchange from the rule filing
requirements under Section 19(b) of the
Exchange Act with respect to the abovedescribed rules it incorporates by
reference. This exemption is
conditioned upon the Exchange
promptly providing written notice to its
applicants and members whenever Cboe
changes a Cboe Incorporated Rule.
Accordingly, It is Ordered, pursuant
to Section 36 of the Exchange Act,32 that
the Exchange is exempt from the rule
filing requirements of Section 19(b) of
the Exchange Act solely with respect to
changes to the rules identified in the
Exemptive Request, provided that the
Exchange promptly provides written
notice to its applicants and members
whenever Cboe proposes to change a
Cboe Incorporated Rule.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.33
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–04220 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 5690/
803–00247]
Lewis Family Advisors, LLC
February 24, 2021.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Nasdaq BX Order, supra note 29.
U.S.C. 78mm.
33 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(76).
32 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 01, 2021
Jkt 253001
Jean
E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at (202)
551–6811 or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch
Chief, at (202) 551–6825 (Division of
Investment Management, Chief
Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website either at https://www.sec.gov/
rules/iareleases.shtml or by calling (202)
551–8090.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Applicant’s Representations
Notice of application for an exemptive
order under section 202(a)(11)(H) of the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’).
31 See
Lewis Family Advisors, LLC
(the ‘‘Applicant’’).
RELEVANT ADVISERS ACT SECTIONS:
Exemption requested under section
202(a)(11)(H) of the Advisers Act from
section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act.
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The
Applicant requests that the Commission
issue an order declaring it to be a person
not within the intent of Section
202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act, which
defines the term ‘‘investment adviser.’’
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on June 4, 2018, and amended on
August 30, 2019, and December 8, 2020.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING:
An order granting the requested relief
will be issued unless the Commission
orders a hearing. Interested persons may
request a hearing by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov and serving the
Applicant with a copy of the request by
email. Hearing requests should be
received by the Commission by 5:30
p.m. on March 22, 2021, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the
Applicant, in the form of an affidavit or,
for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to Rule 0–5 under the Advisers
Act, hearing requests should state the
nature of the writer’s interest, any facts
bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the
request, and the issues contested.
Persons may request notification of a
hearing by emailing the Commission’s
Secretary at Secretarys-Office@sec.gov.
ADDRESSES: The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. Applicant:
Lewis Family Advisors, LLC, c/o Clare
F. Black, Esq., at clare.black@
lewismc.com.
APPLICANT:
1. The Applicant is a Nevada Family
Trust Company and a multi-generational
single-family office that provides or
intends to provide services to the family
and descendants of Ralph M. Lewis. The
Applicant is wholly-owned by Family
Clients and is exclusively controlled
(directly and indirectly) by one or more
Family Members and/or Family Entities
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
12253
in compliance with Rule 202(a)(11)(G)–
1 (the ‘‘Family Office Rule’’). For
purposes of the application, the term
‘‘Lewis Family’’ means the lineal
descendants of Ralph M. Lewis, their
spouses or spousal equivalents, and all
other persons and entities that qualify as
‘‘Family Clients’’ as defined in
paragraph (d)(4) of the Family Office
Rule. Unless otherwise indicated,
capitalized terms herein have the same
meaning as defined in the Family Office
Rule.
2. The Applicant provides both
advisory and non-advisory services
(collectively, ‘‘Services’’) to members of
the Lewis Family. Any Service provided
by the Applicant that relates to
investment advice about securities or
may otherwise be construed as advisory
in nature is considered an ‘‘Advisory
Service.’’
3. The Applicant represents that: (i)
Each of the persons served by the
Applicant is a Family Client (i.e., the
Applicant has no investment advisory
clients other than Family Clients as
required by paragraph (b)(1) of the
Family Office Rule); (ii) the Applicant is
owned and controlled in a manner that
complies in all respects with paragraph
(b)(2) of the Family Office Rule; and (iii)
the Applicant does not hold itself out to
the public as an investment adviser as
required by paragraph (b)(3) of the
Family Office Rule. At the time of the
application, the Applicant represents
that Family Members account for
approximately 99% of the natural
persons to whom the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
4. In addition to the Family Clients,
the Applicant desires to provide
Services (including Advisory Services)
to a niece (‘‘Niece’’) of Ralph M. Lewis
(the ‘‘Additional Family Client’’). The
Additional Family Client does not have
an ownership interest in the Applicant.
The Applicant represents that the assets
beneficially owned by Family Members
and/or Family Entities (excluding the
Additional Family Client) would make
up at least 100% of the assets for which
the Applicant provides Advisory
Services.
5. The Applicant represents that the
Niece has been supported by Family
Members and has been considered and
treated as a close family member of the
Lewis Family for purposes of
intrafamilial affection for many years
and has attended various family events.
The Applicant maintains that including
the Additional Family Client in the
‘‘family’’ would be consistent with the
existing familial relationship among the
family members.
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
12254
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 39 / Tuesday, March 2, 2021 / Notices
Applicant’s Legal Analysis
1. Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers
Act defines the term ‘‘investment
adviser’’ to mean ‘‘any person who, for
compensation, engages in the business
of advising others, either directly or
through publications or writings, as to
the value of securities or as to the
advisability of investing in, purchasing,
or selling securities, or who, for
compensation and as part of a regular
business, issues or promulgates analyses
or reports concerning securities. . . .’’
2. The Applicant falls within the
definition of an investment adviser
under Section 202(a)(11). The Family
Office Rule provides an exclusion from
the definition of investment adviser for
which the Applicant is currently
eligible but would no longer qualify if
the Applicant provides Services to the
Additional Family Clients. Absent the
requested relief, once the Applicant
provides Services to the Additional
Family Client and can no longer rely on
the Family Office Rule, the Applicant
would be required to register as an
investment adviser in the State of
Nevada and would be subject to
regulation in the State of Nevada,
notwithstanding that (i) the Applicant
does not hold itself out to the public as
an investment adviser and does not
market non-public offerings to persons
or entities that are not Family Clients,
(ii) the Applicant is wholly owned and
controlled by members of the Lewis
Family, in accordance with paragraph
(b)(2) of the Family Office Rule, and (iii)
the Applicant is a ‘‘family office’’ for the
Lewis Family and will not offer its
Services to anyone other than Family
Clients and the Additional Family
Client.
3. The Applicant submits that its
proposed relationship with the
Additional Family Client does not
change the nature of the office into that
of a commercial advisory firm. In
support of this argument, the Applicant
notes that if the Common Ancestor
chosen were one branch higher in the
familial tree, the Niece would be a
Family Member. The Applicant states
that in requesting the order, the
Applicant is not attempting to expand
its operations or engage in any level of
commercial activity to which the
Advisers Act is designed to apply.
Indeed, although the Additional Family
Client does not fall within the definition
of Family Member, the Applicant
represents that the Additional Family
Client has been treated as a close family
member of the Lewis Family for many
years. Additionally, the Applicant
represents that if the Additional Family
Client’s assets were managed by the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:11 Mar 01, 2021
Jkt 253001
Applicant, the assets owned by the
Additional Family Client would
represent less than half of one percent
(.5%) of the Applicant’s assets under
management.
4. The Applicant also submits that
there is no public interest in requiring
the Applicant to be registered under the
Advisers Act. The Applicant states that
the office is a private organization that
was formed to be the family trust
company for the Lewis Family, and that
the Applicant does not have any public
clients. The Applicant maintains that
the office’s Advisory Services are
exclusively tailored to the needs of the
Lewis Family and the Additional
Family Client. The Applicant argues
that the provision of Advisory Services
to the Additional Family Client does not
create any public interest that would
require the office to be registered under
the Advisers Act that is different in any
manner than the considerations that
apply to a ‘‘family office’’ that complies
in all respects with the Family Office
Rule.
5. The Applicant argues that, although
the Family Office Rule largely codified
the exemptive orders that the
Commission had previously issued
before the enactment of the Dodd-Frank
Wall Street Reform and Consumer
Protection Act, the Commission
recognized in proposing the rule that
the exact representations, conditions, or
terms contained in every exemptive
order could not be captured in a rule of
general applicability. The Commission
noted that family offices would remain
free to seek a Commission exemptive
order to advise an individual or entity
that did not meet the proposed family
client definition, and that certain issues
would be more appropriately addressed
through an exemptive order process
where the Commission can consider the
specific facts and circumstances, than
through a rule of general applicability.
6. The Applicant maintains that,
based on its unusual circumstances—
desiring to provide Services to one
Additional Family Client who has been
considered and treated as a family
member and whose status as a client of
the office would not change the nature
of the office’s operations to that of a
commercial advisory business—an
exemptive order is appropriate based on
the Applicant’s specific facts and
circumstances.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the
Applicant requests an order declaring it
to be a person not within the intent of
Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act.
The Applicant submits that the order is
necessary and appropriate, in the public
interest, consistent with the protection
of investors, and consistent with the
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Advisers Act.
Applicant’s Conditions
1. The Applicant will offer and
provide Advisory Services only to
Family Clients and to the Additional
Family Client, who generally will be
deemed to be, and be treated as if she
were, a Family Client; provided,
however, that the Additional Family
Client will be deemed to be, and treated
as if she were, a Family Member for
purposes of paragraph (b)(1) and for
purposes of paragraph (d)(4)(vi) of the
Family Office Rule.
2. The Applicant will at all times be
wholly-owned by Family Clients and
exclusively controlled (directly or
indirectly) by one or more Family
Members or Family Entities (excluding
the Additional Family Client’s Family
Entities) as defined in paragraph (d)(5)
of the Family Office Rule.
3. At all times the assets beneficially
owned by Family Members and/or
Family Entities (excluding the
Additional Family Client’s Family
Entities) will account for at least 99% of
the assets for which the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
4. The Applicant will comply with all
the terms for exclusion from the
definition of investment adviser under
the Advisers Act set forth in the Family
Office Rule except for the limited
exception requested by this application.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–04215 Filed 3–1–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Internal Revenue Service
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request for Affordable Care Act
Internal Claims and Appeals and
External Review Disclosures
Internal Revenue Service (IRS),
Treasury.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
The Internal Revenue Service,
as part of its continuing effort to reduce
paperwork and respondent burden,
invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to take this
opportunity to comment on continuing
information collections, as required by
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
The IRS is soliciting comments
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\02MRN1.SGM
02MRN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 39 (Tuesday, March 2, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12253-12254]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-04215]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Advisers Act Release No. 5690/803-00247]
Lewis Family Advisors, LLC
February 24, 2021.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of application for an exemptive order under section
202(a)(11)(H) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (``Advisers
Act'').
Applicant: Lewis Family Advisors, LLC (the ``Applicant'').
Relevant Advisers Act Sections: Exemption requested under section
202(a)(11)(H) of the Advisers Act from section 202(a)(11) of the
Advisers Act.
Summary of Application: The Applicant requests that the Commission
issue an order declaring it to be a person not within the intent of
Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act, which defines the term
``investment adviser.''
Filing Dates: The application was filed on June 4, 2018, and amended
on August 30, 2019, and December 8, 2020.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at [email protected] and serving the Applicant with a
copy of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on March 22, 2021, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the Applicant, in the form of an
affidavit or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to Rule
0-5 under the Advisers Act, hearing requests should state the nature of
the writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a
hearing on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues
contested. Persons may request notification of a hearing by emailing
the Commission's Secretary at [email protected].
ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. Applicant: Lewis
Family Advisors, LLC, c/o Clare F. Black, Esq., at
[email protected].
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jean E. Minarick, Senior Counsel, at
(202) 551-6811 or Kaitlin C. Bottock, Branch Chief, at (202) 551-6825
(Division of Investment Management, Chief Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website either at https://www.sec.gov/rules/iareleases.shtml or by calling (202) 551-8090.
Applicant's Representations
1. The Applicant is a Nevada Family Trust Company and a multi-
generational single-family office that provides or intends to provide
services to the family and descendants of Ralph M. Lewis. The Applicant
is wholly-owned by Family Clients and is exclusively controlled
(directly and indirectly) by one or more Family Members and/or Family
Entities in compliance with Rule 202(a)(11)(G)-1 (the ``Family Office
Rule''). For purposes of the application, the term ``Lewis Family''
means the lineal descendants of Ralph M. Lewis, their spouses or
spousal equivalents, and all other persons and entities that qualify as
``Family Clients'' as defined in paragraph (d)(4) of the Family Office
Rule. Unless otherwise indicated, capitalized terms herein have the
same meaning as defined in the Family Office Rule.
2. The Applicant provides both advisory and non-advisory services
(collectively, ``Services'') to members of the Lewis Family. Any
Service provided by the Applicant that relates to investment advice
about securities or may otherwise be construed as advisory in nature is
considered an ``Advisory Service.''
3. The Applicant represents that: (i) Each of the persons served by
the Applicant is a Family Client (i.e., the Applicant has no investment
advisory clients other than Family Clients as required by paragraph
(b)(1) of the Family Office Rule); (ii) the Applicant is owned and
controlled in a manner that complies in all respects with paragraph
(b)(2) of the Family Office Rule; and (iii) the Applicant does not hold
itself out to the public as an investment adviser as required by
paragraph (b)(3) of the Family Office Rule. At the time of the
application, the Applicant represents that Family Members account for
approximately 99% of the natural persons to whom the Applicant provides
Advisory Services.
4. In addition to the Family Clients, the Applicant desires to
provide Services (including Advisory Services) to a niece (``Niece'')
of Ralph M. Lewis (the ``Additional Family Client''). The Additional
Family Client does not have an ownership interest in the Applicant. The
Applicant represents that the assets beneficially owned by Family
Members and/or Family Entities (excluding the Additional Family Client)
would make up at least 100% of the assets for which the Applicant
provides Advisory Services.
5. The Applicant represents that the Niece has been supported by
Family Members and has been considered and treated as a close family
member of the Lewis Family for purposes of intrafamilial affection for
many years and has attended various family events. The Applicant
maintains that including the Additional Family Client in the ``family''
would be consistent with the existing familial relationship among the
family members.
[[Page 12254]]
Applicant's Legal Analysis
1. Section 202(a)(11) of the Advisers Act defines the term
``investment adviser'' to mean ``any person who, for compensation,
engages in the business of advising others, either directly or through
publications or writings, as to the value of securities or as to the
advisability of investing in, purchasing, or selling securities, or
who, for compensation and as part of a regular business, issues or
promulgates analyses or reports concerning securities. . . .''
2. The Applicant falls within the definition of an investment
adviser under Section 202(a)(11). The Family Office Rule provides an
exclusion from the definition of investment adviser for which the
Applicant is currently eligible but would no longer qualify if the
Applicant provides Services to the Additional Family Clients. Absent
the requested relief, once the Applicant provides Services to the
Additional Family Client and can no longer rely on the Family Office
Rule, the Applicant would be required to register as an investment
adviser in the State of Nevada and would be subject to regulation in
the State of Nevada, notwithstanding that (i) the Applicant does not
hold itself out to the public as an investment adviser and does not
market non-public offerings to persons or entities that are not Family
Clients, (ii) the Applicant is wholly owned and controlled by members
of the Lewis Family, in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of the Family
Office Rule, and (iii) the Applicant is a ``family office'' for the
Lewis Family and will not offer its Services to anyone other than
Family Clients and the Additional Family Client.
3. The Applicant submits that its proposed relationship with the
Additional Family Client does not change the nature of the office into
that of a commercial advisory firm. In support of this argument, the
Applicant notes that if the Common Ancestor chosen were one branch
higher in the familial tree, the Niece would be a Family Member. The
Applicant states that in requesting the order, the Applicant is not
attempting to expand its operations or engage in any level of
commercial activity to which the Advisers Act is designed to apply.
Indeed, although the Additional Family Client does not fall within the
definition of Family Member, the Applicant represents that the
Additional Family Client has been treated as a close family member of
the Lewis Family for many years. Additionally, the Applicant represents
that if the Additional Family Client's assets were managed by the
Applicant, the assets owned by the Additional Family Client would
represent less than half of one percent (.5%) of the Applicant's assets
under management.
4. The Applicant also submits that there is no public interest in
requiring the Applicant to be registered under the Advisers Act. The
Applicant states that the office is a private organization that was
formed to be the family trust company for the Lewis Family, and that
the Applicant does not have any public clients. The Applicant maintains
that the office's Advisory Services are exclusively tailored to the
needs of the Lewis Family and the Additional Family Client. The
Applicant argues that the provision of Advisory Services to the
Additional Family Client does not create any public interest that would
require the office to be registered under the Advisers Act that is
different in any manner than the considerations that apply to a
``family office'' that complies in all respects with the Family Office
Rule.
5. The Applicant argues that, although the Family Office Rule
largely codified the exemptive orders that the Commission had
previously issued before the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the Commission recognized in
proposing the rule that the exact representations, conditions, or terms
contained in every exemptive order could not be captured in a rule of
general applicability. The Commission noted that family offices would
remain free to seek a Commission exemptive order to advise an
individual or entity that did not meet the proposed family client
definition, and that certain issues would be more appropriately
addressed through an exemptive order process where the Commission can
consider the specific facts and circumstances, than through a rule of
general applicability.
6. The Applicant maintains that, based on its unusual
circumstances--desiring to provide Services to one Additional Family
Client who has been considered and treated as a family member and whose
status as a client of the office would not change the nature of the
office's operations to that of a commercial advisory business--an
exemptive order is appropriate based on the Applicant's specific facts
and circumstances.
7. For the foregoing reasons, the Applicant requests an order
declaring it to be a person not within the intent of Section 202(a)(11)
of the Advisers Act. The Applicant submits that the order is necessary
and appropriate, in the public interest, consistent with the protection
of investors, and consistent with the purposes fairly intended by the
policy and provisions of the Advisers Act.
Applicant's Conditions
1. The Applicant will offer and provide Advisory Services only to
Family Clients and to the Additional Family Client, who generally will
be deemed to be, and be treated as if she were, a Family Client;
provided, however, that the Additional Family Client will be deemed to
be, and treated as if she were, a Family Member for purposes of
paragraph (b)(1) and for purposes of paragraph (d)(4)(vi) of the Family
Office Rule.
2. The Applicant will at all times be wholly-owned by Family
Clients and exclusively controlled (directly or indirectly) by one or
more Family Members or Family Entities (excluding the Additional Family
Client's Family Entities) as defined in paragraph (d)(5) of the Family
Office Rule.
3. At all times the assets beneficially owned by Family Members
and/or Family Entities (excluding the Additional Family Client's Family
Entities) will account for at least 99% of the assets for which the
Applicant provides Advisory Services.
4. The Applicant will comply with all the terms for exclusion from
the definition of investment adviser under the Advisers Act set forth
in the Family Office Rule except for the limited exception requested by
this application.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-04215 Filed 3-1-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P