Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers, and Components Thereof (III) Institution of Investigation, 11552-11553 [2021-03895]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
11552
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices
Wildlife Conservation Commission;
DOI; NOAA; EPA; and USDA.
Background
On August 20, 2019, the FL TIG
posted a public notice at https://
www.gulfspillrestoration.noaa.gov
requesting new or revised natural
resource restoration project ideas by
September 20, 2019, for the Florida
Restoration Area. The notice stated that
the FL TIG was seeking project ideas for
the following restoration types: (1)
Habitat Projects on Federally Managed
Lands; (2) Sea Turtles; (3) Marine
Mammals; (4) Birds; (5) Provide and
Enhance Recreational Opportunities;
and (6) Oysters. On July 29, 2020, the FL
TIG announced that it had initiated
drafting of the RP/EA and that it would
include a reasonable range of restoration
alternatives (projects) for five restoration
types. The FL TIG decided not to
include Oysters Restoration Type
projects in the DRAFT RP/EA (see RP/
EA for further details).
Overview of the FL TIG Draft RP/EA
The Draft RP/EA provides the FL
TIG’s analysis of the reasonable range of
alternatives. The FL TIG’s 19 preferred
alternatives are presented in the
following table under the restoration
type from which funds would be
allocated in accordance with the DWH
Consent Decree. The FL TIG also
evaluated five non-preferred alternatives
in addition to the No Action alternative.
Restoration Type: Habitat Projects on Federally Managed Lands:
Johnson Beach Access Management and Habitat Protection.
Perdido Key Sediment Placement.
Pensacola Beach Fort Pickens Road Wildlife Lighting Retrofits.
Restoration Type: Sea Turtles:
Increased Observers and Outreach to Reduce Incidental Hooking of Sea Turtles in Recreational Fisheries along Florida’s Gulf Coast.
Reducing Threats to Sea Turtles through Removal of In-water Marine Debris along Florida’s Gulf Coast.
Assessing Risk and Conducting Public Outreach to Reduce Vessel Strikes on Sea Turtles along Florida’s Gulf Coast.
Restoration Type: Marine Mammals:
Florida Gulf Coast Marine Mammal Stranding Network.
Restoration Type: Birds:
Gomez Key Oyster Reef Expansion and Breakwaters for American Oystercatchers.
Egmont Key Vegetation Management and Dune Retention.
Northeast Florida Coastal Predation Management.
Florida Shorebird and Seabird Stewardship and Habitat Management—5 Years.
Restoration Type: Provide and Enhance Recreational Opportunities:
Pensacola Community Maritime Park Public Fishing Marina.
Baars Park and Sanders Beach Kayak Fishing Trail Access Upgrades.
Engineering and Design for Pensacola Beach Park West Fishing Pier and Access Improvements.
Gulf Breeze Parks Boating and Fishing Access Upgrades.
Lincoln Park Boat Ramp and Dock Improvements.
Florida Artificial Reef Creation and Restoration—Phase 2.
Apollo Beach Recreational Sportfish Hatchery Facility.
Restoration Types: Habitat Projects on Federally Managed Lands and Provide and Enhance Recreational Opportunities:
St. Vincent National Wildlife Refuge Access and Recreational Improvements through Acquisition at Indian Pass.
Next Steps
As described above in DATES, the
Trustees will host a public webinar to
facilitate the public review and
comment process. After the public
comment period ends, the Trustees will
consider and address the comments
received before issuing a final RP/EA.
Public comments and Trustee responses
will be included in the final RP/EA.
Public Availability of Comments
Before including your address, phone
number, email address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you can ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
https://www.doi.gov/deepwaterhorizon/
adminrecord.
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
Authority
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1251]
The authority for this action is the Oil
Pollution Act of 1990 (33 U.S.C. 2701 et
seq.), its implementing NRDA
regulations found at 15 CFR part 990,
and the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) and
its implementing regulations found at
40 CFR 1500–1508.
Mary Josie Blanchard,
Department of the Interior, Director of Gulf
of Mexico Restoration.
[FR Doc. 2021–03908 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4333–15–P
Administrative Record
The documents comprising the
Administrative Record for DRAFT RP/
EA can be viewed electronically at
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Feb 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Certain Cellular Signal Boosters,
Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers,
and Components Thereof (III)
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 21, 2021, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Wilson Electronics LLC of St.
George, Utah. Supplements were filed
on February 1, 8, and 11, 2021. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain cellular signal boosters,
repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and
components thereof by reason of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 36 / Thursday, February 25, 2021 / Notices
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 7,221,967 (‘‘the ’967 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 7,409,186 (‘‘the ’186
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,486,929 (‘‘the
’929 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,729,669
(‘‘the ’669 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,783,318 (‘‘the ’318 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 8,583,033 (‘‘the ’033 patent’’);
U.S. Patent No. 8,583,034 (‘‘the ’034
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,639,180 (‘‘the
’180 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,755,399
(‘‘the ’399 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
8,849,187 (‘‘the ’187 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 8,874,029 (‘‘the ’029 patent’’);
and U.S. Patent No. 8,874,030 (‘‘the ’030
patent’’). The complaint, as
supplemented, further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
February 19, 2021, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to section 210.10(a)(6) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(a)(6), three
separate investigations be instituted
based on the complaint to further
efficient adjudication, one of which is
instituted by this notice of investigation,
and that this decision shall not preclude
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Feb 24, 2021
Jkt 253001
the presiding Administrative Law Judge
from further severing the investigation
pursuant to section 210.14(h) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14(h), if
appropriate;
(2) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
5–7, 10, and 14 of the ’929 patent; claim
1 of the ’186 patent; claims 1–7 and 10–
12 of the ’399 patent; and claims 1–3 of
the ’187 patent; and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘cellular signal
boosters, cellular repeaters, bidirectional cellular signal amplifiers,
and components such as low-noise
amplifiers, power amplifiers, filters,
duplexers, triplexers, multiplexers,
attenuators, power detectors,
microcontrollers, and processors’’;
(4) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Wilson
Electronics LLC, 3301 E Desert Drive, St.
George, UT 84790.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Cellphone-Mate, Inc. d/b/a SureCall,
48346 Milmont Drive, Fremont, CA
94538; Shenzhen SureCall
Communication Technology Co., Ltd.,
Yangtian Rd. 72 Area Baoan District,
Shenzhen, China, 518040.
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
11553
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 22, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021–03895 Filed 2–24–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1249]
Certain Cellular Signal Boosters,
Repeaters, Bi-Directional Amplifiers,
and Components Thereof (I);
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
January 21, 2021, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Wilson Electronics LLC of St.
George, Utah. Supplements were filed
on February 1, 8, and 11, 2021. The
complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain cellular signal boosters,
repeaters, bi-directional amplifiers, and
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\25FEN1.SGM
25FEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 36 (Thursday, February 25, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 11552-11553]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03895]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1251]
Certain Cellular Signal Boosters, Repeaters, Bi-Directional
Amplifiers, and Components Thereof (III) Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 21, 2021, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Wilson
Electronics LLC of St. George, Utah. Supplements were filed on February
1, 8, and 11, 2021. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain cellular signal boosters, repeaters, bi-
directional amplifiers, and components thereof by reason of
[[Page 11553]]
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,221,967 (``the '967
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,409,186 (``the '186 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 7,486,929 (``the '929 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,729,669 (``the
'669 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,783,318 (``the '318 patent''); U.S.
Patent No. 8,583,033 (``the '033 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,583,034
(``the '034 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,639,180 (``the '180 patent'');
U.S. Patent No. 8,755,399 (``the '399 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
8,849,187 (``the '187 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,874,029 (``the '029
patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,874,030 (``the '030 patent''). The
complaint, as supplemented, further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on February 19, 2021, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to section 210.10(a)(6) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(a)(6), three separate
investigations be instituted based on the complaint to further
efficient adjudication, one of which is instituted by this notice of
investigation, and that this decision shall not preclude the presiding
Administrative Law Judge from further severing the investigation
pursuant to section 210.14(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.14(h), if appropriate;
(2) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 5-7, 10, and 14 of the '929 patent; claim 1 of the '186
patent; claims 1-7 and 10-12 of the '399 patent; and claims 1-3 of the
'187 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``cellular signal
boosters, cellular repeaters, bi-directional cellular signal
amplifiers, and components such as low-noise amplifiers, power
amplifiers, filters, duplexers, triplexers, multiplexers, attenuators,
power detectors, microcontrollers, and processors'';
(4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Wilson Electronics LLC, 3301 E Desert
Drive, St. George, UT 84790.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served: Cellphone-Mate, Inc. d/b/a SureCall, 48346 Milmont
Drive, Fremont, CA 94538; Shenzhen SureCall Communication Technology
Co., Ltd., Yangtian Rd. 72 Area Baoan District, Shenzhen, China,
518040.
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: February 22, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-03895 Filed 2-24-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
