Certain Cellular Communications Infrastructure Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation, 10596-10597 [2021-03465]

Download as PDF 10596 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices Yellowstone County McKinley Elementary School, 820 North 31st St., Billings, SG100006311 NEW YORK Dutchess County [FR Doc. 2021–03505 Filed 2–19–21; 8:45 am] Wethersfield, 257 Pugsley Hill Rd., Amenia, SG100006303 BILLING CODE 4312–52–P Suffolk County Bumpstead, John, House (Boundary Decrease), (Huntington Town MRA), 473 Woodbury Rd., Cold Spring Harbor, BC100006306 Nichols Park, Main St., Spencer, SG100006304 OHIO Muskingum College Campus Historic District (Boundary Increase), Roughly bounded by Stormont St. & College, Lakeside, and Stadium Drs., New Concord, BC100006314 TEXAS Lubbock County Great Plains Life Insurance Company Building, 1220 Broadway, Lubbock, SG100006318 Additional documentation has been received for the following resources: KENTUCKY Bourbon County Duncan Avenue Historic District (Additional Documentation), Duncan, Stoner, Vine, and Massie Sts., Paris, AD88000902 VIRGINIA Montgomery County North Fork Valley Rural Historic District (Additional Documentation), (Montgomery County MPS), Along the North Fork of the Roanoke R. from the Roanoke Co. line south to Lusters Gate, Blacksburg vicinity, AD90002169 Nominations submitted by Federal Preservation Officers: The State Historic Preservation Officer reviewed the following nominations and responded to the Federal Preservation Officer within 45 days of receipt of the nominations and supports listing the properties in the National Register of Historic Places. ARIZONA Maricopa County U.S. Courthouse and Federal Office Building, 230 North 1st Ave., Phoenix, SG100006317 NEW YORK Suffolk County Fort Terry Historic District, Plum Island, Southold vicinity, SG100006315 Authority: Section 60.13 of 36 CFR part 60 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 [Investigation No. 337–TA–1248] U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Muskingum County VerDate Sep<11>2014 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION Certain Cellular Communications Infrastructure Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of Investigation Tioga County tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES Dated: February 17, 2021. Paul Lusignan, Historian, Acting Chief, National Register of Historic Places/National Historic Landmarks Program. Jkt 253001 Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on January 15, 2021, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Ericsson Inc. of Plano, Texas and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Sweden. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain cellular communications infrastructure systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,037,166 (‘‘the ’166 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,107,082 (‘‘the ’082 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,509,605 (‘‘the ’605 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 9,692,682 (‘‘the ’682 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of the Secretary, Docket Services Division, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on February 16, 2021, Ordered That— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 5 and 13 of the ’166 patent; claims 1, 11, and 16 of the ’082 patent; claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 17, and 18 of the ’605 patent; and claims 1–3, 6, 7, 12–17, and 24–27 of the ’682 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘cellular communications infrastructure systems, base stations, and core network systems, components thereof, and products containing same’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: Ericsson Inc., 6300 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024 Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, SE–164 83, Stockholm, Sweden (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 33 / Monday, February 22, 2021 / Notices Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 129 Samsung-Ro, Maetan-3dong,, Yoeongtong-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16677, Republic of Korea INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 731–TA–1092 (Second Review)] Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660–2112 (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party to this investigation. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: February 16, 2021. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2021–03465 Filed 2–19–21; 8:45 am] tkelley on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof From China; Scheduling of Expedited Five-Year Review United States International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: The Commission hereby gives notice of the scheduling of an expedited review pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on diamond sawblades and parts thereof from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. DATES: November 6, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stamen Borisson (202–205–3125), Office of Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain information on this matter by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https:// www.usitc.gov). The public record for these reviews may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background.—On November 6, 2020, the Commission determined that the domestic interested party group response to its notice of institution (85 FR 46719, August 3, 2020) of the subject five-year review was adequate and that the respondent interested party group response was inadequate. The Commission did not find any other circumstances that would warrant conducting a full review.1 Accordingly, the Commission determined that it would conduct an expedited review pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)). For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B SUMMARY: 1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is available from the Office of the Secretary and at the Commission’s website. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:48 Feb 19, 2021 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 10597 (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207). Please note the Secretary’s Office will accept only electronic filings at this time. Filings must be made through the Commission’s Electronic Document Information System (EDIS, https:// edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any electronic filings will be accepted until further notice. Staff report.—A staff report containing information concerning the subject matter of the review was placed in the nonpublic record on February 17, 2021, and made available to persons on the Administrative Protective Order service list for this review. A public version will be issued thereafter, pursuant to section 207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules. Written submissions.—As provided in section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s rules, interested parties that are parties to the review and that have provided individually adequate responses to the notice of institution,2 and any party other than an interested party to the review may file written comments with the Secretary on what determination the Commission should reach in the review. Comments are due on or before February 25, 2021 and may not contain new factual information. Any person that is neither a party to the five-year review nor an interested party may submit a brief written statement (which shall not contain any new factual information) pertinent to the review by February 25, 2021. However, should the Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for its completion of the final results of its review, the deadline for comments (which may not contain new factual information) on Commerce’s final results is three business days after the issuance of Commerce’s results. If comments contain business proprietary information (BPI), they must conform with the requirements of sections 201.6, 207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s rules. The Commission’s Handbook on Filing Procedures, available on the Commission’s website at https:// www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_ on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates 2 The Commission has found the response to its notice of institution from the Diamond Sawblades Manufacturers’ Coalition (‘‘DSMC’’), an association of two U.S. producers of diamond sawblades and parts thereof (Diamond Products Limited and Western Saw, Inc.), to be individually adequate for its members. Comments from other interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR 207.62(d)(2)). E:\FR\FM\22FEN1.SGM 22FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 33 (Monday, February 22, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 10596-10597]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03465]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1248]


Certain Cellular Communications Infrastructure Systems, 
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Institution of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on January 15, 2021, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Ericsson Inc. 
of Plano, Texas and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson of Sweden. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain cellular communications 
infrastructure systems, components thereof, and products containing 
same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 
9,037,166 (``the '166 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,107,082 (``the '082 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 9,509,605 (``the '605 patent''); and U.S. 
Patent No. 9,692,682 (``the '682 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists or is in the 
process of being established as required by the applicable Federal 
Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion 
order and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of the 
Secretary, Docket Services Division, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, telephone (202) 205-1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on February 16, 2021, Ordered That--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 5 and 13 of the '166 patent; claims 1, 11, and 16 of the '082 
patent; claims 1, 2, 7, 8, 10, 11, 14, 17, and 18 of the '605 patent; 
and claims 1-3, 6, 7, 12-17, and 24-27 of the '682 patent, and whether 
an industry in the United States exists or is in the process of being 
established as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``cellular 
communications infrastructure systems, base stations, and core network 
systems, components thereof, and products containing same'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

Ericsson Inc., 6300 Legacy Drive, Plano, TX 75024

Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, Torshamnsgatan 21, Kista, SE-164 83, 
Stockholm, Sweden

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:


[[Page 10597]]


Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd., 129 Samsung-Ro, Maetan-3dong,, 
Yoeongtong-Gu, Suwon, Gyeonggi 16677, Republic of Korea

Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 Challenger Road, Ridgefield Park, 
NJ 07660-2112

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as 
a party to this investigation.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission 
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the 
complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. 
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the 
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor 
is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: February 16, 2021.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2021-03465 Filed 2-19-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P