Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Rules at Equity 4, Section 4703(h) Relating to Reserve Orders, 10141 [2021-03214]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 31 / Thursday, February 18, 2021 / Notices SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–91109; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2020–090] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange’s Rules at Equity 4, Section 4703(h) Relating to Reserve Orders February 11, 2021. I. Introduction On December 15, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Nasdaq’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to amend the Exchange’s rules at Equity 4, Section 4703(h) relating to orders with the reserve size order attribute. The proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register on December 30, 2020.3 The Commission has received no comments on the proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change. II. Description of the Proposal Pursuant to Equity 4, Section 4703(h) of the Exchange’s rules, reserve size is an order attribute that permits a participant to stipulate that an order type that is displayed may have its displayed size replenished from additional non-displayed size. When a participant enters an order with reserve size (‘‘Reserve Order’’), the full size of the order will be presented for potential execution in compliance with Regulation NMS and thereafter, unexecuted portions of the order will be processed as a displayed order and a non-displayed order.4 When a Reserve Order is posted, if there is an execution against the displayed order that causes its size to decrease below a normal unit of trading, a new displayed order will be entered and receive a new timestamp, while the size of the non-displayed order will be reduced by the same amount and will not receive a new timestamp.5 The Exchange proposes to amend Equity 4, Section 4703(h) to provide 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90793 (December 23, 2020), 85 FR 86598 (‘‘Notice’’). 4 See Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h). See also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90389 (November 10, 2020), 85 FR 73304 (November 17, 2020) (amending Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h) relating to Reserve Orders). 5 See Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h). jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 2 17 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Feb 17, 2021 Jkt 253001 that, if the new displayed order would lock an order that posted to the Nasdaq book before replenishment can occur, the displayed order would post at the locking price if the resting order is nondisplayed,6 or would be repriced, ranked, and displayed at one minimum price increment lower (higher) than the locking price if the resting order to sell (buy) is displayed. The proposed functionality would also apply to a Reserve Order that does not execute fully upon initial order entry, if the displayed order portion of the Reserve Order would lock a resting order upon entry.7 According to the Exchange, it established the Reserve Order with the intention that the order would always act as a provider of liquidity upon replenishment, and this is what Exchange participants have come to expect from the operation of Reserve Orders.8 The Exchange states that the proposal would eliminate any ambiguity under its existing rules as to whether a Reserve Order would take liquidity when a locking order posts to the Nasdaq book prior to the Reserve Order completing its replenishment (or prior to the displayed order portion of the Reserve Order posting to the Nasdaq book for the first time).9 III. Discussion and Commission Findings After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities exchange.10 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6 The Exchange states that, if the new displayed order posts to the Nasdaq book and locks a resting non-displayed order with the Trade Now order attribute enabled, then consistent with the definition of Trade Now, the Trade Now functionality would apply and the non-displayed order would be able to execute against the locking displayed order as a liquidity taker. See Notice, supra note 3, at 86598–99 n.7. If a locked nondisplayed order does not have the Trade Now order attribute enabled, then new incoming orders would be eligible to execute against the displayed order. See id. See also Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(m) (describing the Trade Now order attribute). 7 See Notice, supra note 3, at 86598 n.6. The Exchange also proposes to correct a non-substantive typographical error in Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h). 8 See id. at 86598. 9 See id. at 86599. The Exchange also states that a rule filing from 2016 introduced a rare circumstance where a Reserve Order, upon replenishment of its displayed order portion, theoretically could become a liquidity remover under existing Exchange rules. See id. at 86598–89. 10 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). PO 00000 Frm 00108 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 9990 10141 6(b)(5) of the Act,11 which requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. As discussed above, the proposed rule change is designed to provide that a Reserve Order, after posting on the Nasdaq book, would always act as a liquidity provider upon replenishment of its displayed order portion. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is reasonably designed to ensure that a Reserve Order would operate similarly during race conditions (i.e., when a locking order posts to the Nasdaq book prior to the Reserve Order completing its replenishment, or prior to the displayed order portion of the Reserve Order posting to the Nasdaq book for the first time) as it would during non-race conditions. The Commission also believes that the proposed rule change would provide the users of Reserve Orders greater certainty and transparency about how the Exchange processes these orders.12 Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. IV. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,13 that the proposed rule change (SR–NASDAQ– 2020–090) be, and hereby is, approved. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.14 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2021–03214 Filed 2–17–21; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P 11 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). Commission also believes that the correction of the non-substantive typographical error in Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h) would improve the readability and clarity of that rule. 13 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 14 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 12 The E:\FR\FM\18FEN1.SGM 18FEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 31 (Thursday, February 18, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Page 10141]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-03214]



[[Page 10141]]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-91109; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-090]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Order 
Approving a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Exchange's Rules at 
Equity 4, Section 4703(h) Relating to Reserve Orders

February 11, 2021.

I. Introduction

    On December 15, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Exchange'' or 
``Nasdaq'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission''), pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 (``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ a 
proposed rule change to amend the Exchange's rules at Equity 4, Section 
4703(h) relating to orders with the reserve size order attribute. The 
proposed rule change was published for comment in the Federal Register 
on December 30, 2020.\3\ The Commission has received no comments on the 
proposed rule change. This order approves the proposed rule change.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 90793 (December 23, 
2020), 85 FR 86598 (``Notice'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

II. Description of the Proposal

    Pursuant to Equity 4, Section 4703(h) of the Exchange's rules, 
reserve size is an order attribute that permits a participant to 
stipulate that an order type that is displayed may have its displayed 
size replenished from additional non-displayed size. When a participant 
enters an order with reserve size (``Reserve Order''), the full size of 
the order will be presented for potential execution in compliance with 
Regulation NMS and thereafter, unexecuted portions of the order will be 
processed as a displayed order and a non-displayed order.\4\ When a 
Reserve Order is posted, if there is an execution against the displayed 
order that causes its size to decrease below a normal unit of trading, 
a new displayed order will be entered and receive a new timestamp, 
while the size of the non-displayed order will be reduced by the same 
amount and will not receive a new timestamp.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ See Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h). See also Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 90389 (November 10, 2020), 85 FR 73304 
(November 17, 2020) (amending Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h) 
relating to Reserve Orders).
    \5\ See Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Exchange proposes to amend Equity 4, Section 4703(h) to provide 
that, if the new displayed order would lock an order that posted to the 
Nasdaq book before replenishment can occur, the displayed order would 
post at the locking price if the resting order is non-displayed,\6\ or 
would be repriced, ranked, and displayed at one minimum price increment 
lower (higher) than the locking price if the resting order to sell 
(buy) is displayed. The proposed functionality would also apply to a 
Reserve Order that does not execute fully upon initial order entry, if 
the displayed order portion of the Reserve Order would lock a resting 
order upon entry.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ The Exchange states that, if the new displayed order posts 
to the Nasdaq book and locks a resting non-displayed order with the 
Trade Now order attribute enabled, then consistent with the 
definition of Trade Now, the Trade Now functionality would apply and 
the non-displayed order would be able to execute against the locking 
displayed order as a liquidity taker. See Notice, supra note 3, at 
86598-99 n.7. If a locked non-displayed order does not have the 
Trade Now order attribute enabled, then new incoming orders would be 
eligible to execute against the displayed order. See id. See also 
Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(m) (describing the Trade Now order 
attribute).
    \7\ See Notice, supra note 3, at 86598 n.6. The Exchange also 
proposes to correct a non-substantive typographical error in 
Exchange Equity 4, Section 4703(h).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    According to the Exchange, it established the Reserve Order with 
the intention that the order would always act as a provider of 
liquidity upon replenishment, and this is what Exchange participants 
have come to expect from the operation of Reserve Orders.\8\ The 
Exchange states that the proposal would eliminate any ambiguity under 
its existing rules as to whether a Reserve Order would take liquidity 
when a locking order posts to the Nasdaq book prior to the Reserve 
Order completing its replenishment (or prior to the displayed order 
portion of the Reserve Order posting to the Nasdaq book for the first 
time).\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See id. at 86598.
    \9\ See id. at 86599. The Exchange also states that a rule 
filing from 2016 introduced a rare circumstance where a Reserve 
Order, upon replenishment of its displayed order portion, 
theoretically could become a liquidity remover under existing 
Exchange rules. See id. at 86598-89.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

III. Discussion and Commission Findings

    After careful review, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities 
exchange.\10\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed 
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\11\ which 
requires, among other things, that the rules of a national securities 
exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and 
practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster 
cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has 
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As discussed above, the proposed rule change is designed to provide 
that a Reserve Order, after posting on the Nasdaq book, would always 
act as a liquidity provider upon replenishment of its displayed order 
portion. The Commission believes that the proposed rule change is 
reasonably designed to ensure that a Reserve Order would operate 
similarly during race conditions (i.e., when a locking order posts to 
the Nasdaq book prior to the Reserve Order completing its 
replenishment, or prior to the displayed order portion of the Reserve 
Order posting to the Nasdaq book for the first time) as it would during 
non-race conditions. The Commission also believes that the proposed 
rule change would provide the users of Reserve Orders greater certainty 
and transparency about how the Exchange processes these orders.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ The Commission also believes that the correction of the 
non-substantive typographical error in Exchange Equity 4, Section 
4703(h) would improve the readability and clarity of that rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Based on the foregoing, the Commission finds that the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act.

IV. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the 
Act,\13\ that the proposed rule change (SR-NASDAQ-2020-090) be, and 
hereby is, approved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-03214 Filed 2-17-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.