Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule, 8930-8933 [2021-02714]
Download as PDF
8930
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices
instructions and forms regarding
contacting OPM and etc.
DATES: Comments are encouraged and
will be accepted until April 12, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title, by the following method:
—Federal Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
All submissions received must
include the agency name and docket
number or RIN for this document. The
general policy for comments and other
submissions from members of the public
is to make these submissions available
for public viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including any
personal identifiers or contact
information.
A
copy of this ICR with applicable
supporting documentation, may be
obtained by contacting the Retirement
Services Publications Team, Office of
Personnel Management, 1900 E Street
NW, Room 3316–L, Washington, DC
20415, Attention: Cyrus S. Benson, or
sent via electronic mail to
Cyrus.Benson@opm.gov or faxed to
(202) 606–0910 or via telephone at (202)
606–4808.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: As
required by the Paperwork Reduction
Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–13, 44 U.S.C.
chapter 35) as amended by the ClingerCohen Act (Pub. L. 104–106), OPM is
soliciting comments for this collection
(OMB No. 3206–0121). The Office of
Management and Budget is particularly
interested in comments that:
1. Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of functions
of the agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
2. Evaluate the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
3. Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
4. Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology,
e.g., permitting electronic submissions
of responses.
Standard Form 2800 is needed to
collect information so that OPM can pay
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Feb 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
death benefits to the survivors of
Federal employees and annuitants.
Standard Form 2800A is needed for
deaths in service so that survivors can
make the needed elections regarding
military service.
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2021–67,
CP2021–70.
Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2021–02747 Filed 2–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–12–P
Analysis
Agency: Retirement Operations,
Retirement Services, Office of Personnel
Management.
Title: Application for Death Benefits
under the Civil Service Retirement
System (SF 2800); and Documentation
and Elections in Support of Application
for Death Benefits When Deceased Was
an Employee at the Time of Death (SF
2800A).
OMB Number: 3206–0156.
Frequency: On occasion.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households.
Number of Respondents: SF 2800 =
40,000; SF 2800A = 400.
Estimated Time per Respondent: SF
2800 = 45 minutes; SF 2800A = 45
minutes.
Total Burden Hours: 30,300 (SF 2800
= 30,000; SF 2800A = 300).
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91065; File No. SR–
NYSEAMER–2021–07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
American LLC; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the NYSE
American Options Fee Schedule
February 4, 2021.
BILLING CODE 6325–38–P
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on February
1, 2021, NYSE American LLC (‘‘NYSE
American’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
POSTAL SERVICE
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Office of Personnel Management.
Alexys Stanley,
Regulatory Affairs Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2021–02706 Filed 2–9–21; 8:45 am]
Product Change—Priority Mail and
First-Class Package Service
Negotiated Service Agreement
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Postal Service gives
notice of filing a request with the Postal
Regulatory Commission to add a
domestic shipping services contract to
the list of Negotiated Service
Agreements in the Mail Classification
Schedule’s Competitive Products List.
DATES: Date of required notice: February
10, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sean Robinson, 202–268–8405.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
United States Postal Service® hereby
gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C.
3642 and 3632(b)(3), on February 3,
2021, it filed with the Postal Regulatory
Commission a USPS Request to Add
Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 190 to Competitive
Product List. Documents are available at
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Exchange proposes to amend the
NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
(‘‘Fee Schedule’’) to introduce a new
credit applicable to Customer Electronic
executions. The Exchange proposes to
implement the fee change effective
February 1, 2021. The proposed rule
change is available on the Exchange’s
website at www.nyse.com, at the
principal office of the Exchange, and at
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
promoting market depth, facilitating
tighter spreads, and enhancing price
discovery to the benefit of all market
participants.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
2. Statutory Basis
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify
the Fee Schedule to add a new credit for
Customer Electronic Simple and
Complex executions based on an ATP
Holder’s achievement of certain volume
thresholds. Specifically, an ATP Holder
that executes the requisite volume in
Complex CUBE Auctions, Customer
Electronic executions, and Professional
(as defined in Section I.H. of the Fee
Schedule) Electronic executions will
earn a $0.10 per contract credit on
Customer Electronic executions,
excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC
Transactions, and orders routed to
another exchange. The Exchange
proposes to introduce this pricing on
February 1, 2021.
Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule
currently provides incentives for ATP
Holders that increase their Electronic
volume in the Professional Customer,
Broker Dealer, Non-NYSE American
Options Market Maker, and Firm ranges
(collectively, the ‘‘Professional’’ range).
The Exchange proposes to modify
Section I.H. to provide ATP Holders
with a new credit of $0.10 per contract
on Customer Electronic Simple and
Complex executions (excluding CUBE
Auctions, QCC Transactions, and orders
routed to another exchange), provided
that each of three monthly volume
qualifications are met: (a) 15,000
Contracts ADV from Initiating CUBE
Orders in Complex CUBE Auctions; (b)
Customer Electronic executions of
0.05% of TCADV, excluding CUBE
Auctions, QCC Transactions, and
volume from orders routed to another
exchange; and (c) Professional
Electronic executions of 0.03% of
TCADV.4 In calculating an OFP’s
Electronic volume for purposes of this
credit, the Exchange will include the
activity of either (i) Affiliates of the
OFP, such as when an OFP has an
Affiliated NYSE American Options
Market Making firm, or (ii) an
Appointed MM of such OFP.
The Exchange believes the proposed
credit will continue to incent ATP
Holders to direct order flow to the
Exchange and also encourage ATP
Holders to engage in a variety of
transactions on the Exchange, thereby
4 See
proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.H.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Feb 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change is consistent with
Section 6(b) of the Act,5 in general, and
furthers the objectives of Sections
6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,6 in particular,
because it provides for the equitable
allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members,
issuers and other persons using its
facilities and does not unfairly
discriminate between customers,
issuers, brokers or dealers.
The Proposed Rule Change Is
Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market. The Commission
has repeatedly expressed its preference
for competition over regulatory
intervention in determining prices,
products, and services in the securities
markets. In Regulation NMS, the
Commission highlighted the importance
of market forces in determining prices
and SRO revenues and, also, recognized
that current regulation of the market
system ‘‘has been remarkably successful
in promoting market competition in its
broader forms that are most important to
investors and listed companies.’’ 7
There are currently 16 registered
options exchanges competing for order
flow. Based on publicly-available
information, and excluding index-based
options, no single exchange has more
than 16% of the market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.8
Therefore, currently no exchange
possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of multiply-listed equity
and ETF options order flow. More
specifically, in November 2020, the
Exchange had less than 10% market
share of executed volume of multiplylisted equity and ETF options trades.9
5 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808
(June 9, 2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005)
(S7–10–04) (‘‘Reg NMS Adopting Release’’).
8 The OCC publishes options and futures volume
in a variety of formats, including daily and monthly
volume by exchange, available here: https://
www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-DataReports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/MonthlyWeekly-Volume-Statistics.
9 Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly
volume of equity-based options and monthly
volume of ETF-based options, see id., the
Exchange’s market share in multiply-listed equity
and ETF options increased from 8.06% for the
month of November 2019 to 9.09% for the month
of November 2020.
6 15
PO 00000
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8931
The Exchange believes that the evershifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month
demonstrates that market participants
can shift order flow, or discontinue or
reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes.
Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction
fees. Stated otherwise, changes to
exchange transaction fees and rebates
can have a direct effect on the ability of
an exchange to compete for order flow.
The proposed rule change is designed
to continue to incent ATP Holders to
direct liquidity to the Exchange in a
variety of forms and from a variety of
sources, thereby promoting market
depth, price discovery, and price
improvement and enhancing order
execution opportunities for market
participants. In particular, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to provide ATP
Holders with a credit for achieving
certain volume goals in different types
of executions, consistent with credits
offered through a similarly-structured
program on a competing options
exchange.10
The Exchange believes that the
proposed credit is reasonably designed
to encourage ATP Holders to execute a
variety of orders on the Exchange and
that having multiple volume criteria to
qualify for the proposed credit should
encourage greater use of the Exchange
by all ATP Holders, which may lead to
greater opportunities to trade—and for
price improvement—for all participants.
Further, the Exchange believes the
proposed new credit would continue to
attract more volume and liquidity to the
Exchange generally and would therefore
benefit all market participants through
increased opportunities to trade at
potentially improved prices, as well as
by enhancing price discovery.
Finally, to the extent the proposed
fees and credits encourage greater
volume and liquidity, the Exchange
believes the proposed change would
continue to improve the Exchange’s
overall competitiveness and strengthen
its market quality for all market
participants. In the backdrop of the
competitive environment in which the
Exchange operates, the proposed rule
change is a reasonable attempt by the
Exchange to maintain its market share
relative to its competitors.
10 See, e.g., Cboe Exchange Inc. Fee Schedule,
Volume Incentive Program, available at: https://
cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/Cboe_
FeeSchedule.pdf (providing comparable per
contract credits for Customer orders based on
volume from a variety of executions, including
auction volume, volume from various account
types, and volume from both simple and complex
executions).
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
8932
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices
The Proposed Rule Change Is an
Equitable Allocation of Fees and Credits
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is an equitable allocation of
its fees and credits. The proposal is
based on the amount and type of
business transacted on the Exchange
and ATP Holders can opt to avail
themselves of the incentive or not.
Moreover, the proposal is designed to
encourage ATP Holders and their
affiliated or appointed parties to
aggregate their executions at the
Exchange as a primary execution venue.
To the extent that the proposed change
continues to attract more executions to
the Exchange, this increased order flow
would continue to make the Exchange a
more competitive venue for order
execution. Thus, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change would
improve market quality for all market
participants on the Exchange and, as a
consequence, continue to attract more
order flow to the Exchange thereby
improving market-wide quality and
price discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not
Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is not unfairly discriminatory
because the proposed modifications
would be available to all similarlysituated market participants on an equal
and non-discriminatory basis. The
Exchange’s fees and credits are designed
to continue to encourage greater use of
the Exchange, which may lead to greater
opportunities to trade—and for price
improvement—for all participants.
The proposal is based on the amount
and type of business transacted on the
Exchange and ATP Holders are not
obligated to try to achieve the incentive.
Rather, the proposal is designed to
continue to encourage participants to
utilize the Exchange as a primary
trading venue (if they have not done so
previously) or increase Electronic
volume sent to the Exchange. To the
extent that the proposed change
continues to attract more executions—
and executions of varying types—to the
Exchange, this increased order flow
would continue to make the Exchange a
more competitive venue for order
execution. Thus, the Exchange believes
the proposed rule change would
continue to improve market quality for
all market participants on the Exchange
and, as a consequence, attract more
order flow to the Exchange, thereby
improving market-wide quality and
price discovery. The resulting volume
and liquidity would continue to provide
more trading opportunities and tighter
spreads to all market participants and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Feb 09, 2021
Jkt 253001
thus would promote just and equitable
principles of trade, remove
impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it
is subject to significant competitive
forces, as described below in the
Exchange’s statement regarding the
burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act, the Exchange does not believe
that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
Instead, as discussed above, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
changes would continue to encourage
the submission of additional liquidity to
a public exchange, thereby promoting
market depth, price discovery and
transparency and enhancing order
execution opportunities for all market
participants. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes
further the Commission’s goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering
integrated competition among orders,
which promotes ‘‘more efficient pricing
of individual stocks for all types of
orders, large and small.’’ 11
Intramarket Competition. The
proposed change is designed to
continue to attract increased and diverse
order flow to the Exchange by offering
competitive credits based on increased
volumes on the Exchange, which may
increase the volumes of contracts traded
on the Exchange. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change, by offering an additional
credit applicable to Customer Electronic
executions, will incent ATP Holders to
direct order flow to the Exchange and
participate in a variety of types of
executions on the Exchange to meet the
proposed thresholds to qualify for the
credit. To the extent that this purpose is
achieved, all of the Exchange’s market
participants should benefit from the
continued market liquidity. Enhanced
market quality and increased
transaction volume that results from the
increase in order flow directed to the
Exchange will benefit all market
participants and improve competition
on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The
Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market
11 See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 7,
at 37499.
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
participants can readily favor one of the
16 competing option exchanges if they
deem fee levels at a particular venue to
be excessive. In such an environment,
the Exchange must continually adjust its
fees and credits to remain competitive
with other exchanges and to attract
order flow to the Exchange. Based on
publicly-available information, and
excluding index-based options, no
single exchange currently has more than
16% of the market share of executed
volume of multiply-listed equity and
ETF options trades.12 Therefore, no
exchange currently possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of
multiply-listed equity and ETF options
order flow. More specifically, in
November 2020, the Exchange had less
than 10% market share of executed
volume of multiply-listed equity and
ETF options trades.13
The Exchange believes that the
proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment because it
modifies the Exchange’s fees and credits
in a manner designed to encourage ATP
Holders to direct trading interest to the
Exchange, to provide liquidity and to
attract order flow. Specifically, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change will encourage ATP Holders
to direct increased Electronic volume to
the Exchange, thereby increasing the
number of executions (and executions of
varying types) on the Exchange and
continuing to make the Exchange a more
competitive venue for order execution.
To the extent that this purpose is
achieved, all the Exchange’s market
participants should benefit from the
improved market quality and increased
opportunities for price improvement.
The Exchange believes that the
proposed changes could promote
competition between the Exchange and
other execution venues by encouraging
additional orders to be sent to the
Exchange for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective
upon filing pursuant to Section
12 See
supra note 8.
on OCC data, supra note 9, the
Exchange’s market share in multiply-listed equity
and ETF options increased from 8.06% for the
month of November 2019 to 9.09% for the month
of November 2020.
13 Based
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 26 / Wednesday, February 10, 2021 / Notices
19(b)(3)(A) 14 of the Act and
subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b–4 15
thereunder, because it establishes a due,
fee, or other charge imposed by the
Exchange.
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of such proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
under Section 19(b)(2)(B) 16 of the Act to
determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSEAMER–2021–07 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2021–07. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
14 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(2).
16 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSEAMER–2021–07, and
should be submitted on or before March
3, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–02714 Filed 2–9–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[SEC File No. 270–297, OMB Control No.
3235–0336]
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
Revision: Form N–14
Notice is hereby given that, under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (‘‘Paperwork
Reduction Act’’), the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the
‘‘Commission’’) has submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
(‘‘OMB’’) a request for extension of the
15 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:53 Feb 09, 2021
17 17
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8933
previously approved collection of
information discussed below.
Form N–14 (17 CFR 239.23) is the
form for registration under the
Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. 77a et
seq.) (‘‘Securities Act’’) of securities
issued by management investment
companies registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940 (15
U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.) (‘‘Investment
Company Act’’) and business
development companies as defined by
Section 2(a)(48) of the Investment
Company Act in: (1) A transaction of the
type specified in rule 145(a) under the
Securities Act (17 CFR 230.145(a)); (2) a
merger in which a vote or consent of the
security holders of the company being
acquired is not required pursuant to
applicable state law; (3) an exchange
offer for securities of the issuer or
another person; (4) a public reoffering or
resale of any securities acquired in an
offering registered on Form N–14; or (5)
two or more of the transactions listed in
(1) through (4) registered on one
registration statement. The principal
purpose of Form N–14 is to make
material information regarding
securities to be issued in connection
with business combination transactions
available to investors. The information
required to be filed with the
Commission permits verification of
compliance with securities law
requirements and assures the public
availability and dissemination of such
information. Without the registration
statement requirement, material
information may not necessarily be
available to investors.
Estimates of the average burden hours
are made solely for the purposes of the
Paperwork Reduction Act and are not
derived from a comprehensive or even
representative survey or study of the
costs of Commission rules and forms.
The collection of information under
Form N–14 is mandatory. The
information provided under Form N–14
will not be kept confidential. An agency
may not conduct or sponsor, and a
person is not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
E:\FR\FM\10FEN1.SGM
10FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 26 (Wednesday, February 10, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8930-8933]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02714]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91065; File No. SR-NYSEAMER-2021-07]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE American LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the NYSE American Options Fee Schedule
February 4, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on February 1, 2021, NYSE American LLC (``NYSE American''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend the NYSE American Options Fee
Schedule (``Fee Schedule'') to introduce a new credit applicable to
Customer Electronic executions. The Exchange proposes to implement the
fee change effective February 1, 2021. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal
office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
[[Page 8931]]
The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C
below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this filing is to modify the Fee Schedule to add a
new credit for Customer Electronic Simple and Complex executions based
on an ATP Holder's achievement of certain volume thresholds.
Specifically, an ATP Holder that executes the requisite volume in
Complex CUBE Auctions, Customer Electronic executions, and Professional
(as defined in Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule) Electronic executions
will earn a $0.10 per contract credit on Customer Electronic
executions, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and orders
routed to another exchange. The Exchange proposes to introduce this
pricing on February 1, 2021.
Section I.H. of the Fee Schedule currently provides incentives for
ATP Holders that increase their Electronic volume in the Professional
Customer, Broker Dealer, Non-NYSE American Options Market Maker, and
Firm ranges (collectively, the ``Professional'' range).
The Exchange proposes to modify Section I.H. to provide ATP Holders
with a new credit of $0.10 per contract on Customer Electronic Simple
and Complex executions (excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC Transactions, and
orders routed to another exchange), provided that each of three monthly
volume qualifications are met: (a) 15,000 Contracts ADV from Initiating
CUBE Orders in Complex CUBE Auctions; (b) Customer Electronic
executions of 0.05% of TCADV, excluding CUBE Auctions, QCC
Transactions, and volume from orders routed to another exchange; and
(c) Professional Electronic executions of 0.03% of TCADV.\4\ In
calculating an OFP's Electronic volume for purposes of this credit, the
Exchange will include the activity of either (i) Affiliates of the OFP,
such as when an OFP has an Affiliated NYSE American Options Market
Making firm, or (ii) an Appointed MM of such OFP.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See proposed Fee Schedule, Section I.H.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes the proposed credit will continue to incent
ATP Holders to direct order flow to the Exchange and also encourage ATP
Holders to engage in a variety of transactions on the Exchange, thereby
promoting market depth, facilitating tighter spreads, and enhancing
price discovery to the benefit of all market participants.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change is consistent
with Section 6(b) of the Act,\5\ in general, and furthers the
objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and (5) of the Act,\6\ in particular,
because it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues,
fees, and other charges among its members, issuers and other persons
using its facilities and does not unfairly discriminate between
customers, issuers, brokers or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Proposed Rule Change Is Reasonable
The Exchange operates in a highly competitive market. The
Commission has repeatedly expressed its preference for competition over
regulatory intervention in determining prices, products, and services
in the securities markets. In Regulation NMS, the Commission
highlighted the importance of market forces in determining prices and
SRO revenues and, also, recognized that current regulation of the
market system ``has been remarkably successful in promoting market
competition in its broader forms that are most important to investors
and listed companies.'' \7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 51808 (June 9,
2005), 70 FR 37496, 37499 (June 29, 2005) (S7-10-04) (``Reg NMS
Adopting Release'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
There are currently 16 registered options exchanges competing for
order flow. Based on publicly-available information, and excluding
index-based options, no single exchange has more than 16% of the market
share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options
trades.\8\ Therefore, currently no exchange possesses significant
pricing power in the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options order flow. More specifically, in November 2020, the Exchange
had less than 10% market share of executed volume of multiply-listed
equity and ETF options trades.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The OCC publishes options and futures volume in a variety of
formats, including daily and monthly volume by exchange, available
here: https://www.theocc.com/Market-Data/Market-Data-Reports/Volume-and-Open-Interest/Monthly-Weekly-Volume-Statistics.
\9\ Based on a compilation of OCC data for monthly volume of
equity-based options and monthly volume of ETF-based options, see
id., the Exchange's market share in multiply-listed equity and ETF
options increased from 8.06% for the month of November 2019 to 9.09%
for the month of November 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the ever-shifting market share among the
exchanges from month to month demonstrates that market participants can
shift order flow, or discontinue or reduce use of certain categories of
products, in response to fee changes. Accordingly, competitive forces
constrain options exchange transaction fees. Stated otherwise, changes
to exchange transaction fees and rebates can have a direct effect on
the ability of an exchange to compete for order flow.
The proposed rule change is designed to continue to incent ATP
Holders to direct liquidity to the Exchange in a variety of forms and
from a variety of sources, thereby promoting market depth, price
discovery, and price improvement and enhancing order execution
opportunities for market participants. In particular, the Exchange
believes it is reasonable to provide ATP Holders with a credit for
achieving certain volume goals in different types of executions,
consistent with credits offered through a similarly-structured program
on a competing options exchange.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See, e.g., Cboe Exchange Inc. Fee Schedule, Volume
Incentive Program, available at: https://cdn.cboe.com/resources/membership/Cboe_FeeSchedule.pdf (providing comparable per contract
credits for Customer orders based on volume from a variety of
executions, including auction volume, volume from various account
types, and volume from both simple and complex executions).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed credit is reasonably
designed to encourage ATP Holders to execute a variety of orders on the
Exchange and that having multiple volume criteria to qualify for the
proposed credit should encourage greater use of the Exchange by all ATP
Holders, which may lead to greater opportunities to trade--and for
price improvement--for all participants.
Further, the Exchange believes the proposed new credit would
continue to attract more volume and liquidity to the Exchange generally
and would therefore benefit all market participants through increased
opportunities to trade at potentially improved prices, as well as by
enhancing price discovery.
Finally, to the extent the proposed fees and credits encourage
greater volume and liquidity, the Exchange believes the proposed change
would continue to improve the Exchange's overall competitiveness and
strengthen its market quality for all market participants. In the
backdrop of the competitive environment in which the Exchange operates,
the proposed rule change is a reasonable attempt by the Exchange to
maintain its market share relative to its competitors.
[[Page 8932]]
The Proposed Rule Change Is an Equitable Allocation of Fees and Credits
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is an equitable
allocation of its fees and credits. The proposal is based on the amount
and type of business transacted on the Exchange and ATP Holders can opt
to avail themselves of the incentive or not. Moreover, the proposal is
designed to encourage ATP Holders and their affiliated or appointed
parties to aggregate their executions at the Exchange as a primary
execution venue. To the extent that the proposed change continues to
attract more executions to the Exchange, this increased order flow
would continue to make the Exchange a more competitive venue for order
execution. Thus, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change would
improve market quality for all market participants on the Exchange and,
as a consequence, continue to attract more order flow to the Exchange
thereby improving market-wide quality and price discovery.
The Proposed Rule Change Is Not Unfairly Discriminatory
The Exchange believes that the proposal is not unfairly
discriminatory because the proposed modifications would be available to
all similarly-situated market participants on an equal and non-
discriminatory basis. The Exchange's fees and credits are designed to
continue to encourage greater use of the Exchange, which may lead to
greater opportunities to trade--and for price improvement--for all
participants.
The proposal is based on the amount and type of business transacted
on the Exchange and ATP Holders are not obligated to try to achieve the
incentive. Rather, the proposal is designed to continue to encourage
participants to utilize the Exchange as a primary trading venue (if
they have not done so previously) or increase Electronic volume sent to
the Exchange. To the extent that the proposed change continues to
attract more executions--and executions of varying types--to the
Exchange, this increased order flow would continue to make the Exchange
a more competitive venue for order execution. Thus, the Exchange
believes the proposed rule change would continue to improve market
quality for all market participants on the Exchange and, as a
consequence, attract more order flow to the Exchange, thereby improving
market-wide quality and price discovery. The resulting volume and
liquidity would continue to provide more trading opportunities and
tighter spreads to all market participants and thus would promote just
and equitable principles of trade, remove impediments to and perfect
the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system
and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Finally, the Exchange believes that it is subject to significant
competitive forces, as described below in the Exchange's statement
regarding the burden on competition.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
In accordance with Section 6(b)(8) of the Act, the Exchange does
not believe that the proposed rule change would impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. Instead, as discussed above, the Exchange believes
that the proposed changes would continue to encourage the submission of
additional liquidity to a public exchange, thereby promoting market
depth, price discovery and transparency and enhancing order execution
opportunities for all market participants. As a result, the Exchange
believes that the proposed changes further the Commission's goal in
adopting Regulation NMS of fostering integrated competition among
orders, which promotes ``more efficient pricing of individual stocks
for all types of orders, large and small.'' \11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Reg NMS Adopting Release, supra note 7, at 37499.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Intramarket Competition. The proposed change is designed to
continue to attract increased and diverse order flow to the Exchange by
offering competitive credits based on increased volumes on the
Exchange, which may increase the volumes of contracts traded on the
Exchange. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule
change, by offering an additional credit applicable to Customer
Electronic executions, will incent ATP Holders to direct order flow to
the Exchange and participate in a variety of types of executions on the
Exchange to meet the proposed thresholds to qualify for the credit. To
the extent that this purpose is achieved, all of the Exchange's market
participants should benefit from the continued market liquidity.
Enhanced market quality and increased transaction volume that results
from the increase in order flow directed to the Exchange will benefit
all market participants and improve competition on the Exchange.
Intermarket Competition. The Exchange operates in a highly
competitive market in which market participants can readily favor one
of the 16 competing option exchanges if they deem fee levels at a
particular venue to be excessive. In such an environment, the Exchange
must continually adjust its fees and credits to remain competitive with
other exchanges and to attract order flow to the Exchange. Based on
publicly-available information, and excluding index-based options, no
single exchange currently has more than 16% of the market share of
executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF options trades.\12\
Therefore, no exchange currently possesses significant pricing power in
the execution of multiply-listed equity and ETF options order flow.
More specifically, in November 2020, the Exchange had less than 10%
market share of executed volume of multiply-listed equity and ETF
options trades.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See supra note 8.
\13\ Based on OCC data, supra note 9, the Exchange's market
share in multiply-listed equity and ETF options increased from 8.06%
for the month of November 2019 to 9.09% for the month of November
2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change reflects this
competitive environment because it modifies the Exchange's fees and
credits in a manner designed to encourage ATP Holders to direct trading
interest to the Exchange, to provide liquidity and to attract order
flow. Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change
will encourage ATP Holders to direct increased Electronic volume to the
Exchange, thereby increasing the number of executions (and executions
of varying types) on the Exchange and continuing to make the Exchange a
more competitive venue for order execution. To the extent that this
purpose is achieved, all the Exchange's market participants should
benefit from the improved market quality and increased opportunities
for price improvement.
The Exchange believes that the proposed changes could promote
competition between the Exchange and other execution venues by
encouraging additional orders to be sent to the Exchange for execution.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
The foregoing rule change is effective upon filing pursuant to
Section
[[Page 8933]]
19(b)(3)(A) \14\ of the Act and subparagraph (f)(2) of Rule 19b-4 \15\
thereunder, because it establishes a due, fee, or other charge imposed
by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\15\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings under
Section 19(b)(2)(B) \16\ of the Act to determine whether the proposed
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2)(B).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-07 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-07. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSEAMER-2021-07, and should be
submitted on or before March 3, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02714 Filed 2-9-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P