Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Establish a Policy Relating to Billing Errors, 8814-8817 [2021-02591]
Download as PDF
8814
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices
the Exchange,38 and not on an ongoing
basis.
Moreover, the Commission notes the
Exchange’s representations that the
proposed promotional services and
listing ceremonies will be offered to all
listed Companies on the same terms and
conditions without differentiation,39
and that the Exchange will offer
comparable promotional services and
listing ceremonies of comparable value
to each listed Company.40 Accordingly,
the Commission believes that the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, is consistent with
the requirements of the Act and, in
particular, that the services are
equitably allocated among issuers
consistent with Section 6(b)(4) of the
Act,41 and the rule does not unfairly
discriminate between issuers consistent
with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act.42 The
Commission also notes that the
Exchange has represented that if it
expands the menu of promotional
services offered, or elects to provide
new products or services to listed
Companies, the Exchange will
incorporate such changes in a new
proposed rule change.43
The Commission also believes that the
Exchange is responding to competitive
pressures in the market for listings in
making this proposal. Specifically, the
Exchange stated in its proposal that it
expects to face competition as a new
entrant in the market for exchange
listings, and that it believes the
promotional services and listing
ceremonies that it proposes to offer to
listed companies will facilitate LTSE’s
ability to attract and retain listings.44 In
particular, the Exchange maintains that
it expects to face significant competition
from NYSE and Nasdaq for listings, and
that comparable offerings of
promotional services and listing
ceremonies are already provided by
NYSE.45 Accordingly, the Commission
believes that the proposed rule reflects
the current competitive environment for
exchange listings among national
securities exchanges, and is appropriate
and consistent with Section 6(b)(8) of
the Act.46
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
38 See
Amendment No. 1, supra note 4, at 6.
Notice, supra note 3, at 84450.
40 See Amendment No. 1, supra note 4, at 7.
41 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
42 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
43 See Notice, supra note 3, at 84449 n.4.
44 See id. at 84450.
45 See id. at 84449 n.5; id. at 84450. See also
NYSE Listed Company Manual Section 106.03.
46 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
39 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
IV. Solicitation of Comments on
Amendment No. 1
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning whether
Amendment No. 1 is consistent with the
Act. Comments may be submitted by
any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–
LTSE–2020–22 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File No.
SR–LTSE–2020–22. The file numbers
should be included on the subject line
if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make publicly available. All
submissions should refer to File No.
SR–LTSE–2020–22 and should be
submitted on or before March 2, 2021.
V. Accelerated Approval of Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1
The Commission finds good cause to
approve the proposed rule change, as
PO 00000
Frm 00063
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
modified by Amendment No. 1, prior to
the thirtieth day after the date of
publication of notice of the amended
proposal in the Federal Register. As
discussed above, in Amendment No. 1,
the Exchange clarified that: (i) The
proposed promotional services and
listing ceremonies will be offered to
Companies on or around the time of
listing, in connection with listing on the
Exchange; and (ii) that the Exchange
will offer comparable promotional
services and listing ceremonies of
comparable value to each listed
Company. The Commission believes
that these clarifications will help to
ensure that individual listed Companies
are not given specially negotiated
packages of products and services to list
or remain listed, as well as to ensure
that the services are equitably allocated
among issuers consistent with Section
6(b)(4) of the Act 47 and that the rule
does not unfairly discriminate between
issuers consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of
the Act.48 Accordingly, the Commission
finds good cause, pursuant to Section
19(b)(2) of the Act,49 to approve the
proposed rule change, as modified by
Amendment No. 1, on an accelerated
basis.
VI. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,50 that the
proposed rule change (SR–LTSE–2020–
22), as modified by Amendment No. 1,
be, and hereby is, approved on an
accelerated basis.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.51
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–02592 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91053; File No. SR–CBOE–
2021–010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Establish a Policy
Relating to Billing Errors
February 3, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
47 15
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
49 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
50 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
51 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
48 15
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on January
25, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’
or the ‘‘Exchange’’) is filing with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) a proposed rule
change to establish a policy relating to
billing errors. The Exchange has
designated this proposal as noncontroversial and provided the
Commission with the notice required by
Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.5
The text of the proposed rule change
is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at https://
markets.cboe.com/, at the Exchange’s
principal office and at the Public
Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Footnote 7 of its fees schedule which
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
5 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
relates to billing errors and fee disputes.
Footnote 7 currently provides that that
any potential billing errors relating to
fees assessed by Cboe Options must be
brought to the attention of Cboe
Options’ Accounting Department within
three months from the invoice date.
Additionally, all fees assessed shall be
deemed final and non-refundable after
three months from the invoice date.
However, Footnote 7 further provides
that the Exchange is not precluded from
assessing fees more than three months
after they were incurred if those fees
were required to be paid pursuant to the
Cboe Options Fee Schedule in effect at
the time the fees were incurred. The
Exchange proposes to eliminate the
current language in Footnote 7 of the
fees schedule and replace it with
language recently adopted by its
affiliated exchanges.6 Particularly, the
Exchange proposes to provide: ‘‘All fees
and rebates assessed prior to the three
full calendar months before the month
in which the Exchange becomes aware
of a billing error shall be considered
final. Any dispute concerning fees or
rebates billed by the Exchange must be
submitted to the Exchange in writing
and must be accompanied by supporting
documentation.’’
The proposed language would result
in all fees and rebates assessed prior to
the three full calendar months before
the month in which the Exchange
becomes aware of a billing error to be
considered final. Particularly, the
Exchange will resolve an error by
crediting or debiting Trading Permit
Holders (‘‘TPHs’’) and Non-TPHs based
on the fees or rebates that should have
been applied in the three full calendar
months preceding the month in which
the Exchange became aware of the error,
including to all impacted transactions
that occurred during those months.7 The
Exchange will apply the three month
look back regardless of whether the
error was discovered by the Exchange or
by a TPH or Non-TPH that submitted a
fee dispute to the Exchange. The
Exchange will continue to provide all
disputes concerning fees and rebates
assessed by the Exchange would have to
6 See SR–CboeBZX–2020–094; SR-CboeBYX–
2020–034; SR-CboeEDGA–2020–032; SRCboeEDGX–2020–064.
7 For example, if the Exchange becomes aware of
a transaction fee billing error on January 4, 2021,
the Exchange will resolve the error by crediting or
debiting Members based on the fees or rebates that
should have been applied to any impacted
transactions during October, November and
December 2020. The Exchange notes that because
it bills in arrears, the Exchange would be able to
correct the error in advance of issuing the January
2021 invoice and therefore, transactions impacted
through the date of discovery (in this example,
January 4, 2021) and thereafter, would be billed
correctly.
PO 00000
Frm 00064
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8815
be submitted to the Exchange in writing
and accompanied by supporting
documentation.
The Exchange notes that the proposed
language continues to encourage TPHs
and Non-TPHs to promptly review their
Exchange invoices so that any disputed
charges can be addressed in a timely
manner. The Exchange notes that it
provides TPHs with both daily and
monthly fee reports and thus believes
they should be aware of any potential
billing errors within three months.
Requiring that TPHs and Non-TPHs
submit disputes in writing and provide
supporting documentation encourages
them to promptly review their invoices
so that any disputed charges can be
addressed in a timely manner while the
information and data underlying those
charges (e.g., applicable fees and order
information) is still easily and readily
available. This practice will avoid issues
that may arise when TPHs or Non-TPHs
do not dispute an invoice in a timely
manner and will conserve Exchange
resources that would have to be
expended to resolve untimely billing
disputes. As such, the requirement
continues to alleviate administrative
burdens related to billing disputes,
which could divert staff resources away
from the Exchange’s regulatory and
business purposes. The proposed rule
change to eliminate the requirement that
the Exchange assess fees beyond three
months if they were required to be
assessed pursuant to the fees schedule
at the time incurred (i.e., all fees and
rebates would be final after three
months regardless of how far back a
billing error occurred) would provide
both the Exchange and TPHs and NonTPHs finality and the ability to close
their books after a known period of
time.
The Exchange notes that a number of
exchanges have explicitly stated that
they consider all fees to be final after a
similar period of time.8 Additionally,
several other exchanges have adopted
similar provisions in their rules that
provide for a process for their members
and non-members to submit fee
disputes.9 Moreover, the proposed
language is identical to the language
recently adopted on the Exchange’s
8 See e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No.
87650 (December 3, 2019), 84 FR 67304 (December
9, 2019) (SR–NYSECHX–2019–024); Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 84430 (October 16, 2018),
83 FR 53347 (October 22, 2018) (SR–NYSENAT–
2018–23); and Securities Exchange Act Release No.
79060 (October 6, 2016), 81 FR 70716 (October 13,
2016) (SR–ISEGemini–2016–11) .
9 See e.g., MEMX LLC, Rule 15.3, IEX Rule
15.120, Nasdaq Rule Equity 7, Section 70, Nasdaq
BX Rule Equity 7, Section 111, and Nasdaq PHLX
Rule Equity 7, Section 2.
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
8816
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
affiliated exchanges.10 As such, the
proposed change will also harmonize
and conform the Exchange’s billing
practices with that of its affiliated
exchanges. The proposed billing policy
will apply to all charges and rebates
reflected in the Exchange’s fees
schedules.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.11 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 12 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 13 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
With respect to the proposed language
regarding the billing procedure, the
Exchange believes continuing to require
the submission of all billing disputes in
writing, and with supporting
documentation is reasonable because
the Exchange provides TPHs with ample
tools to monitor and account for various
charges incurred in a given month.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that
most TPHs and Non-TPHs that pay
exchange fees are sophisticated entities,
so it is appropriate to expect them to
promptly review their invoices for
errors and to be capable of identifying
such errors. The proposed provision
also continues to promote the protection
of investors and the public interest by
providing a clear and concise
mechanism for TPH and Non-TPHs to
dispute fees and for the Exchange to
review such disputes in a timely
manner. Moreover, the proposed billing
dispute language, which lowers the
Exchange’s administrative burden, is
10 See
supra note 6.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
13 Id.
similar to billing dispute language of
other exchanges, and the same as the
Exchange’s affiliates.14 In addition, the
billing procedure is fair, equitable, and
not unfairly discriminatory because it
will apply equally to all TPHs (and NonTPHs that pay Exchange fees).
The Exchange also believes that
providing that all fees and rebates are
final after three months (i.e., always
resolving billing errors only for the three
full calendar months preceding the
month in which the Exchange became
aware of the error), is reasonable as both
the Exchange and TPHs and Non-TPHs
have an interest in knowing when its fee
assessments are final and when reliance
can be placed on those assessments.
Indeed, without some deadline on
billing errors, the Exchange and TPHs
and Non-TPHs would never be able to
close their books with any confidence.
Furthermore, as noted above, a number
of Exchanges similarly consider their
fees final after a similar period of time.15
The proposed change is also equitable,
and not unfairly discriminatory because
it will apply equally to all TPHs (and
Non-TPHs that pay Exchange fees) and
apply in cases where either the TPH (or
Non-TPH) discovers the error or the
Exchange discovers the error. Lastly, the
proposed changes to the fees schedule
will align the Exchange’s billing
practices with those of its affiliated
exchanges.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change would impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. With respect
to the billing procedure and billing error
policy, the proposed rule change would
provide a clear process that would
apply equally to all TPHs. Additionally,
the proposed rule change is similar to
rules of other exchanges. The Exchange
does not believe such proposed changes
would impair the ability of TPHs or
competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in
the financial markets. Moreover,
because the proposed changes would
apply equally to all TPHs, the proposal
does not impose any burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No comments were solicited or
received on the proposed rule change.
11 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 08, 2021
14 See
15 See
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
supra notes 6 and 9.
supra notes 6 and 8.
Frm 00065
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not (i) significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and; (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the
date on which it was filed, or such
shorter time as the Commission may
designate, it has become effective
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the
Act 16 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 17
thereunder.
The Exchange has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay.18 The Commission
finds that waiving the 30-day operative
delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest
because waiver of the operative delay
will allow the Exchange to provide a
clear process for billing errors and fee
disputes without delay. Moreover, the
proposed rule changes are comparable
to other policies and practices
established by other exchanges and
therefore does not raise any new or
novel issues. Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day
operative delay and designates the
proposal operative upon filing.19
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
16 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) requires a self-regulatory organization to give
the Commission written notice of its intent to file
the proposed rule change at least five business days
prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this
requirement.
18 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
19 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule change’s impact on efficiency,
competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
17 17
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 25 / Tuesday, February 9, 2021 / Notices
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2021–010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2021–010. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change;
the Commission does not edit personal
identifying information from
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–
2021–010 and should be submitted on
or before March 2, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.20
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021–02591 Filed 2–8–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–91048; File No. SR–NYSE–
2021–09]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of
Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Section 907.00 of the Manual
February 3, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that on January
26, 2021, New York Stock Exchange
LLC (‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the self-regulatory
organization. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Section 907.00 of the Manual to clarify
the application of that rule. The
proposed rule change is available on the
Exchange’s website at www.nyse.com, at
the principal office of the Exchange, and
at the Commission’s Public Reference
Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Section 907.00 of the Manual sets
forth complimentary products and
services that issuers are entitled to
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
20 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Feb 08, 2021
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00066
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
8817
receive in connection with their NYSE
listing. The Exchange offers certain
complimentary products and services
and access to discounted third-party
products and services through the NYSE
Market Access Center to listed issuers.
The Exchange also provides
complimentary market surveillance
products and services (with a
commercial value of approximately
$55,000 annually), Web-hosting
products and services (with a
commercial value of approximately
$16,000 annually), web-casting services
(with a commercial value of
approximately $6,500 annually), market
analytics products and services (with a
commercial value of approximately
$30,000 annually), and news
distribution products and services (with
a commercial value of approximately
$20,000 annually) to Eligible New
Listings 4 and Eligible Transfer
Companies 5 based on the following
tiers: 6
Tier A: For Eligible New Listings and
Eligible Transfer Companies with a global
market value of $400 million or more, in each
case calculated as of the date of listing on the
Exchange, the Exchange offers market
surveillance, market analytics, web-hosting,
webcasting, and news distribution products
and services.
Tier B: For Eligible New Listings and
Eligible Transfer Companies with a global
market value of less than $400 million, in
each case calculated as of the date of listing
on the Exchange, the Exchange offers Webhosting, market analytics, web-casting, and
news distribution products and services.
On January 11, 2021, the Commission
approved the Exchange’s proposal to
provide all the additional
complimentary products and services
described above to Eligible New Listings
4 For the purposes of Section 907.00, the term
‘‘Eligible New Listing’’ means (i) any U.S. company
that lists common stock on the Exchange for the
first time and any non-U.S. company that lists an
equity security on the Exchange under Section
102.01 or 103.00 of the Manual for the first time,
regardless of whether such U.S. or non-U.S.
company conducts an offering and (ii) any U.S. or
non-U.S. company emerging from a bankruptcy,
spinoff (where a company lists new shares in the
absence of a public offering), and carve-out (where
a company carves out a business line or division,
which then conducts a separate initial public
offering).
5 For purposes of Section 907.00, the term
‘‘Eligible Transfer Company’’ means any U.S. or
non-U.S. company that transfers its listing of
common stock or equity securities, respectively, to
the Exchange from another national securities
exchange. For purposes of Section 907.00, an
‘‘equity security’’ means common stock or common
share equivalents such as ordinary shares, New
York shares, global shares, American Depository
Receipts, or Global Depository Receipts.
6 Section 907.00 provides for separate service
entitlements for Acquisition Companies listed
under Section 102.06 and the issuers of Equity
Investment Tracking Stocks listed under Section
102.07.
E:\FR\FM\09FEN1.SGM
09FEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 25 (Tuesday, February 9, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 8814-8817]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-02591]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-91053; File No. SR-CBOE-2021-010]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To
Establish a Policy Relating to Billing Errors
February 3, 2021.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the
[[Page 8815]]
``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on January 25, 2021, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe Options'' or the ``Exchange'') is
filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ``Commission'')
a proposed rule change to establish a policy relating to billing
errors. The Exchange has designated this proposal as non-controversial
and provided the Commission with the notice required by Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) under the Act.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The
text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's website
at https://markets.cboe.com/, at the Exchange's principal office and at
the Public Reference Room of the Commission.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Footnote 7 of its fees schedule
which relates to billing errors and fee disputes. Footnote 7 currently
provides that that any potential billing errors relating to fees
assessed by Cboe Options must be brought to the attention of Cboe
Options' Accounting Department within three months from the invoice
date. Additionally, all fees assessed shall be deemed final and non-
refundable after three months from the invoice date. However, Footnote
7 further provides that the Exchange is not precluded from assessing
fees more than three months after they were incurred if those fees were
required to be paid pursuant to the Cboe Options Fee Schedule in effect
at the time the fees were incurred. The Exchange proposes to eliminate
the current language in Footnote 7 of the fees schedule and replace it
with language recently adopted by its affiliated exchanges.\6\
Particularly, the Exchange proposes to provide: ``All fees and rebates
assessed prior to the three full calendar months before the month in
which the Exchange becomes aware of a billing error shall be considered
final. Any dispute concerning fees or rebates billed by the Exchange
must be submitted to the Exchange in writing and must be accompanied by
supporting documentation.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See SR-CboeBZX-2020-094; SR-CboeBYX-2020-034; SR-CboeEDGA-
2020-032; SR-CboeEDGX-2020-064.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed language would result in all fees and rebates assessed
prior to the three full calendar months before the month in which the
Exchange becomes aware of a billing error to be considered final.
Particularly, the Exchange will resolve an error by crediting or
debiting Trading Permit Holders (``TPHs'') and Non-TPHs based on the
fees or rebates that should have been applied in the three full
calendar months preceding the month in which the Exchange became aware
of the error, including to all impacted transactions that occurred
during those months.\7\ The Exchange will apply the three month look
back regardless of whether the error was discovered by the Exchange or
by a TPH or Non-TPH that submitted a fee dispute to the Exchange. The
Exchange will continue to provide all disputes concerning fees and
rebates assessed by the Exchange would have to be submitted to the
Exchange in writing and accompanied by supporting documentation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For example, if the Exchange becomes aware of a transaction
fee billing error on January 4, 2021, the Exchange will resolve the
error by crediting or debiting Members based on the fees or rebates
that should have been applied to any impacted transactions during
October, November and December 2020. The Exchange notes that because
it bills in arrears, the Exchange would be able to correct the error
in advance of issuing the January 2021 invoice and therefore,
transactions impacted through the date of discovery (in this
example, January 4, 2021) and thereafter, would be billed correctly.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange notes that the proposed language continues to
encourage TPHs and Non-TPHs to promptly review their Exchange invoices
so that any disputed charges can be addressed in a timely manner. The
Exchange notes that it provides TPHs with both daily and monthly fee
reports and thus believes they should be aware of any potential billing
errors within three months. Requiring that TPHs and Non-TPHs submit
disputes in writing and provide supporting documentation encourages
them to promptly review their invoices so that any disputed charges can
be addressed in a timely manner while the information and data
underlying those charges (e.g., applicable fees and order information)
is still easily and readily available. This practice will avoid issues
that may arise when TPHs or Non-TPHs do not dispute an invoice in a
timely manner and will conserve Exchange resources that would have to
be expended to resolve untimely billing disputes. As such, the
requirement continues to alleviate administrative burdens related to
billing disputes, which could divert staff resources away from the
Exchange's regulatory and business purposes. The proposed rule change
to eliminate the requirement that the Exchange assess fees beyond three
months if they were required to be assessed pursuant to the fees
schedule at the time incurred (i.e., all fees and rebates would be
final after three months regardless of how far back a billing error
occurred) would provide both the Exchange and TPHs and Non-TPHs
finality and the ability to close their books after a known period of
time.
The Exchange notes that a number of exchanges have explicitly
stated that they consider all fees to be final after a similar period
of time.\8\ Additionally, several other exchanges have adopted similar
provisions in their rules that provide for a process for their members
and non-members to submit fee disputes.\9\ Moreover, the proposed
language is identical to the language recently adopted on the
Exchange's
[[Page 8816]]
affiliated exchanges.\10\ As such, the proposed change will also
harmonize and conform the Exchange's billing practices with that of its
affiliated exchanges. The proposed billing policy will apply to all
charges and rebates reflected in the Exchange's fees schedules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See e.g. Securities Exchange Act Release No. 87650 (December
3, 2019), 84 FR 67304 (December 9, 2019) (SR-NYSECHX-2019-024);
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 84430 (October 16, 2018), 83 FR
53347 (October 22, 2018) (SR-NYSENAT-2018-23); and Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 79060 (October 6, 2016), 81 FR 70716
(October 13, 2016) (SR-ISEGemini-2016-11) .
\9\ See e.g., MEMX LLC, Rule 15.3, IEX Rule 15.120, Nasdaq Rule
Equity 7, Section 70, Nasdaq BX Rule Equity 7, Section 111, and
Nasdaq PHLX Rule Equity 7, Section 2.
\10\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\11\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \13\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the proposed language regarding the billing
procedure, the Exchange believes continuing to require the submission
of all billing disputes in writing, and with supporting documentation
is reasonable because the Exchange provides TPHs with ample tools to
monitor and account for various charges incurred in a given month.
Additionally, the Exchange notes that most TPHs and Non-TPHs that pay
exchange fees are sophisticated entities, so it is appropriate to
expect them to promptly review their invoices for errors and to be
capable of identifying such errors. The proposed provision also
continues to promote the protection of investors and the public
interest by providing a clear and concise mechanism for TPH and Non-
TPHs to dispute fees and for the Exchange to review such disputes in a
timely manner. Moreover, the proposed billing dispute language, which
lowers the Exchange's administrative burden, is similar to billing
dispute language of other exchanges, and the same as the Exchange's
affiliates.\14\ In addition, the billing procedure is fair, equitable,
and not unfairly discriminatory because it will apply equally to all
TPHs (and Non-TPHs that pay Exchange fees).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See supra notes 6 and 9.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also believes that providing that all fees and rebates
are final after three months (i.e., always resolving billing errors
only for the three full calendar months preceding the month in which
the Exchange became aware of the error), is reasonable as both the
Exchange and TPHs and Non-TPHs have an interest in knowing when its fee
assessments are final and when reliance can be placed on those
assessments. Indeed, without some deadline on billing errors, the
Exchange and TPHs and Non-TPHs would never be able to close their books
with any confidence. Furthermore, as noted above, a number of Exchanges
similarly consider their fees final after a similar period of time.\15\
The proposed change is also equitable, and not unfairly discriminatory
because it will apply equally to all TPHs (and Non-TPHs that pay
Exchange fees) and apply in cases where either the TPH (or Non-TPH)
discovers the error or the Exchange discovers the error. Lastly, the
proposed changes to the fees schedule will align the Exchange's billing
practices with those of its affiliated exchanges.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ See supra notes 6 and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change would
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. With respect to the billing
procedure and billing error policy, the proposed rule change would
provide a clear process that would apply equally to all TPHs.
Additionally, the proposed rule change is similar to rules of other
exchanges. The Exchange does not believe such proposed changes would
impair the ability of TPHs or competing order execution venues to
maintain their competitive standing in the financial markets. Moreover,
because the proposed changes would apply equally to all TPHs, the
proposal does not impose any burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No comments were solicited or received on the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not (i)
significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and; (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \16\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) \17\ thereunder.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\17\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative
delay.\18\ The Commission finds that waiving the 30-day operative delay
is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest
because waiver of the operative delay will allow the Exchange to
provide a clear process for billing errors and fee disputes without
delay. Moreover, the proposed rule changes are comparable to other
policies and practices established by other exchanges and therefore
does not raise any new or novel issues. Accordingly, the Commission
hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the proposal
operative upon filing.\19\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\19\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule change's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[[Page 8817]]
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2021-010 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-010. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit
personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2021-010 and should be
submitted on or before March 2, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\20\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2021-02591 Filed 2-8-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P