Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators, 7255-7256 [2021-01803]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices
Assessment Rates
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce
shall determine, and U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) shall assess,
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries covered by this review.
Because International Paper’s and
Suzano’s weighted-average dumping
margins are not zero or de minimis (i.e.,
less than 0.5 percent), Commerce has
calculated importer-specific
antidumping duty assessment rates.
International Paper did not report actual
entered value for all of its U.S. sales;
therefore, we calculated importerspecific per-unit duty assessment rates
by aggregating the total amount of
antidumping duties calculated for the
examined sales and dividing this
amount by the total quantity of those
sales. Because Suzano reported the
entered value of its U.S. sales, we
calculated importer-specific ad valorem
duty assessment rates based on the ratio
of the total amount of dumping
calculated for the examined sales to the
total entered value of the sales. Where
either the respondent’s weightedaverage dumping margin is zero or de
minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR
351.106(c)(1), or an importer-specific
assessment rate is zero or de minimis,
we will instruct CBP to liquidate the
appropriate entries without regard to
antidumping duties.
For entries of subject merchandise
during the period of review produced by
International Paper or Suzano for which
they did not know their merchandise
was destined for the United States, we
will instruct CBP to liquidate
unreviewed entries at the all-others rate
if there is no rate for the intermediate
company(ies) involved in the
transaction.9
Consistent with its recent notice,10
Commerce intends to issue assessment
instructions to CBP no earlier than 35
days after the date of publication of the
final results of this review in the
Federal Register. If a timely summons is
filed at the U.S. Court of International
Trade, the assessment instructions will
direct CBP not to liquidate relevant
entries until the time for parties to file
a request for a statutory injunction has
9 For a full discussion of this practice, see
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954
(May 6, 2003).
10 See Notice of Discontinuation of Policy to Issue
Liquidation Instructions After 15 Days in
Applicable Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Proceedings, 86 FR 3995 (January
15, 2021).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jan 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
expired (i.e., within 90 days of
publication).
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of the subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption on or after the
publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for each specific
company listed above will be that
established in the final results of this
review; (2) for merchandise exported by
producers or exporters not covered in
this administrative review but covered
in a prior segment of the proceeding, the
cash deposit rate will continue to be the
company-specific rate published for the
most recently completed segment of this
proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a
firm covered in this review, a prior
review, or the original less-than-fairvalue (LTFV) investigation, but the
producer is, the cash deposit rate will be
the rate established for the most recently
completed segment of this proceeding
for the producer of the subject
merchandise; and (4) the cash deposit
rate for all other manufacturers or
exporters will continue to be 26.95
percent, the all-others rate established
in the LTFV investigation.11 These
deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during the POR. Failure to comply with
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a final
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return or destruction of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3),
which continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
11 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Brazil: Final
Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 81
FR 3115 (January 20, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
7255
APO materials, or conversion to judicial
protective order, is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and the terms of an APO is a
sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing this
notice in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: January 19, 2021.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
V. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Calculation for Suzano’s
Financial Expenses
Comment 2: Programming Issue in
Suzano’s Margin Calculation
Comment 3: Treatment of International
Paper’s FTZ Sales
Comment 4: Programming Issue in
International Paper’s Margin Calculation
VI. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2021–01676 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion
on the List of Arbitrators
The Department of Commerce will
submit the following information
collection request to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication
of this notice. We invite the general
public and other Federal agencies to
comment on proposed, and continuing
information collections, which helps us
assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. Public
comments were previously requested
via the Federal Register on November
24, 2020, during a 60-day comment
period. This notice allows for an
additional 30 days for public comments.
Agency: International Trade
Administration.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
7256
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 16 / Wednesday, January 27, 2021 / Notices
Title: EU-U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion
on the List of Arbitrators.
OMB Control Number: 0625–0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission,
revision of a current information
collection.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Average Hours per Response: 240
minutes.
Burden Hours: 160 hours.
Needs and Uses: As described in
Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, the Department of
Commerce (the Department) and the
European Commission (the
Commission) committed to implement
an arbitration mechanism to provide
European individuals with the ability to
invoke binding arbitration to determine,
for residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations
under the Privacy Shield. Organizations
voluntarily self-certify to the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework and, upon
certification, the commitments the
organization has made to comply with
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
become legally enforceable under U.S.
law. Organizations that self-certify to
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
commit to binding arbitration of
residual claims if a European individual
chooses to exercise that option. Under
the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield
Panel (consisting of one or three
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has
the authority to impose individualspecific, non-monetary equitable relief
(such as access, correction, deletion, or
return of the European individual’s data
in question) necessary to remedy the
violation of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework only with respect to the
European individual. The Department
and the Commission will seek to
maintain a list of at least 20 arbitrators
chosen based on independence,
integrity, and expertise from which the
parties will select the arbitrators. The
arbitral mechanism outlined in Annex I
of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and Swiss-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework is a critical
component of the Privacy Shield
frameworks. Publishing this notice to
collect information from individuals
applying for inclusion on the list of
arbitrators is a necessary step to
maintain the arbitral mechanism. The
Department previously requested and
obtained approval of this information
collection (OMB Control No. 0625–
0277) and now seeks renewal of this
information collection. Although the
Department is not currently seeking
additional applications, it may do so in
the future as appropriate.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:04 Jan 26, 2021
Jkt 253001
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on
the number of arbitrators required to
retain an active list of 20 arbitrators.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department’s
statutory authority to foster, promote,
and develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512).
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0625–0277.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2021–01803 Filed 1–26–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–602–807]
Certain Uncoated Paper From
Australia: Negative Preliminary
Determination of Circumvention of the
Antidumping Duty Order for Uncoated
Paper Rolls
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that imports of certain uncoated paper
rolls from Australia were not completed
by conversion into sheets of paper in the
United States and, therefore, such
imports are not circumventing the
antidumping duty (AD) order on certain
uncoated paper products from Australia,
within the meaning of section 781(a) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act). We invite interested parties to
comment on this preliminary
determination.
DATES: Applicable January 27, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Genevieve Coen, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3251.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 10, 2019, Commerce
initiated an anti-circumvention inquiry
to determine whether imports of certain
uncoated paper rolls that are further
processed into uncoated paper sheets in
the United States 1 are circumventing
the Order on certain uncoated paper
from Australia.2 Commerce issued a
questionnaire soliciting data on the
quantity and value (Q&V) of exports of
uncoated paper rolls to Australian Paper
Pty. Ltd. (Australian Paper) and
received a timely response, in which
Australian Paper notified Commerce
that it had no shipments of inquiry
merchandise during the period under
consideration. Thereafter, Commerce
selected Australian Paper as the sole
mandatory respondent in this inquiry in
order to examine its no shipment claim,
and we issued an initial questionnaire
and two supplemental questionnaires to
this company. Australian Paper
submitted timely responses to these
questionnaires. For a complete
description of the events that followed
the initiation of this inquiry, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.3
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this Order
includes uncoated paper in sheet form;
weighing at least 40 grams per square
meter but not more than 150 grams per
square meter; that either is a white
paper with a GE brightness level 4 of 85
1 See Certain Uncoated Paper Products from
Australia, Brazil, the People’s Republic of China,
and Indonesia: Initiation of Anti-Circumvention
Inquiry on the Antidumping and Countervailing
Duty Orders, 84 FR 55915 (October 18, 2019).
2 See Certain Uncoated Paper from Australia,
Brazil, Indonesia, the People’s Republic of China,
and Portugal: Amended Final Affirmative
Antidumping Determinations for Brazil and
Indonesia and Antidumping Duty Orders, 81 FR
11174 (March 3, 2016) (Order).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Preliminary Decision
Memorandum for the Anti-Circumvention Inquiry
on the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain
Uncoated Paper from Australia: Uncoated Paper
Rolls,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Preliminary Decision
Memorandum).
4 One of the key measurements of any grade of
paper is brightness. Generally speaking, the brighter
the paper the better the contrast between the paper
and the ink. Brightness is measured using a GE
Reflectance Scale, which measures the reflection of
light off a grade of paper. One is the lowest
reflection, or what would be given to a totally black
grade, and 100 is the brightest measured grade.
‘‘Colored paper’’ as used in this scope definition
means a paper with a hue other than white that
reflects one of the primary colors of magenta,
yellow, and cyan (red, yellow, and blue) or a
combination of such primary colors.
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 16 (Wednesday, January 27, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 7255-7256]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-01803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Comment
Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for
Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators
The Department of Commerce will submit the following information
collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and clearance in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995, on or after the date of publication of this notice. We invite the
general public and other Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and
continuing information collections, which helps us assess the impact of
our information collection requirements and minimize the public's
reporting burden. Public comments were previously requested via the
Federal Register on November 24, 2020, during a 60-day comment period.
This notice allows for an additional 30 days for public comments.
Agency: International Trade Administration.
[[Page 7256]]
Title: EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for
Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators.
OMB Control Number: 0625-0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Request: Regular submission, revision of a current
information collection.
Number of Respondents: 40.
Average Hours per Response: 240 minutes.
Burden Hours: 160 hours.
Needs and Uses: As described in Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework, the Department of Commerce (the Department) and the
European Commission (the Commission) committed to implement an
arbitration mechanism to provide European individuals with the ability
to invoke binding arbitration to determine, for residual claims,
whether an organization has violated its obligations under the Privacy
Shield. Organizations voluntarily self-certify to the EU-U.S. Privacy
Shield Framework and, upon certification, the commitments the
organization has made to comply with the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework become legally enforceable under U.S. law. Organizations that
self-certify to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework commit to binding
arbitration of residual claims if a European individual chooses to
exercise that option. Under the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield
Panel (consisting of one or three arbitrators, as agreed by the
parties) has the authority to impose individual-specific, non-monetary
equitable relief (such as access, correction, deletion, or return of
the European individual's data in question) necessary to remedy the
violation of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework only with respect to
the European individual. The Department and the Commission will seek to
maintain a list of at least 20 arbitrators chosen based on
independence, integrity, and expertise from which the parties will
select the arbitrators. The arbitral mechanism outlined in Annex I of
the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework is a critical component of the Privacy Shield frameworks.
Publishing this notice to collect information from individuals applying
for inclusion on the list of arbitrators is a necessary step to
maintain the arbitral mechanism. The Department previously requested
and obtained approval of this information collection (OMB Control No.
0625-0277) and now seeks renewal of this information collection.
Although the Department is not currently seeking additional
applications, it may do so in the future as appropriate.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Frequency: Recurrent, depending on the number of arbitrators
required to retain an active list of 20 arbitrators.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department's statutory authority to foster,
promote, and develop international commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512).
This information collection request may be viewed at
www.reginfo.gov. Follow the instructions to view the Department of
Commerce collections currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and recommendations for the proposed information
collection should be submitted within 30 days of the publication of
this notice on the following website www.reginfo.gov/public/do/PRAMain.
Find this particular information collection by selecting ``Currently
under 30-day Review--Open for Public Comments'' or by using the search
function and entering either the title of the collection or the OMB
Control Number 0625-0277.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2021-01803 Filed 1-26-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P