Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 86537-86538 [2020-28789]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Notices Procedure for Article 10.12 (Binational Panel Reviews), which were adopted by the three governments for panels requested pursuant to Article 10.12(2) of USMCA which requires Requests for Panel Review to be published in accordance with Rule 40. For the complete Rules, please see https://canmex-usa-sec.org/secretariat/agreementaccord-acuerdo/usmca-aceum-tmec/ rules-regles-reglas/article-articlearticulo_10_12.aspx?lang=eng. The Rules provide that: (a) A Party or interested person may challenge the final determination in whole or in part by filing a Complaint in accordance with Rule 44 no later than 30 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Complaint is December 29, 2020); (b) A Party, investigating authority or interested person who does not file a Complaint but who intends to participate in the panel review must file a Notice of Appearance in accordance with Rule 45 no later than 45 days after the filing of the first Request for Panel Review (the deadline for filing a Notice of Appearance is January 11, 2021); and (c) The panel review shall be limited to the allegations of error of fact or law, including challenges to the jurisdiction of the investigating authority, that are set out in the Complaints filed in the panel review and to the procedural and substantive defenses raised in the panel review. Dated: December 15, 2020. Vidya Desai, Acting U.S. Secretary, USMCA Secretariat. [FR Doc. 2020–28030 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–GT–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–533–876] Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Reliance Industries Limited (Reliance) received countervailable subsidies that are above de minimis during the period of review, November 6, 2017 through December 31, 2018. DATES: Applicable December 30, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett, AD/CVD Operations, AGENCY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Dec 29, 2020 Jkt 253001 Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3609. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 3, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review.1 On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by 50 days.2 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days,3 thereby extending the deadline for these final results until November 19, 2020. On November 5, 2020, Commerce postponed the final results of this review by 33 days until December 22, 2020.4 Scope of the Order The merchandise covered by this order is fine denier polyester staple fiber (fine denier PSF). For a complete description of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the interested parties’ case and rebuttal briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties for these final results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.5 The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 1 See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 85 FR 18916 (April 3, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM). 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 2020. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020. 4 See Memorandum, ‘‘2017–2018 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results,’’ dated November 5, 2020. 5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results in the 2017– 2018 Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India,’’ dated concurrently, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). PO 00000 Frm 00009 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 86537 ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/ frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the issues raised by interested parties and responded to by Commerce in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in the Appendix to this notice. Methodology Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.6 For a description of the methodology underlying Commerce’s conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested parties and record information, we made certain changes to the net subsidy rate calculated for Reliance. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of the Administrative Review In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(B)(5), we find the net countervailable subsidy rate for the period November 6, 2017 through December 31, 2018 to be as follows: Company Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Reliance Industries Limited ...... 4.44 Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after the date of publication of these final results to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise. We will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or 6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5)(A) of the Act regarding specificity. E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1 86538 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 250 / Wednesday, December 30, 2020 / Notices exported by Reliance entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after November 6, 2017 through December 31, 2018, at the ad valorem assessment rate listed above for Reliance. In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend also to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown above on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, Commerce will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit rates, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. VII. Discussion of the Issues Comment 1: Sales Value Denominators Comment 2: Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) To Export Sales Values Comment 3: Discount Rates Comment 4: Calculation of Duty Exemptions Under the Special Economic Zone (SEZ) Duty-Free Importation of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts, and Packing Materials Program and Export Promotion of Capital Goods Scheme (EPCGS) Comment 5: Application of AFA to the SEZ Duty-Free Importation of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts, and Packing Materials Program and EPCGS Comment 6: Land Benchmark Comment 7: Whether the SEZ Programs, Technology Upgradation Fund Scheme (TUFS), and Merchandise Export From India Scheme (MEIS) Are Countervailable VIII. Recommendation Disclosure [FR Doc. 2020–28789 Filed 12–29–20; 8:45 am] Commerce intends to disclose the calculations and analysis performed for these final results to interested parties within five days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register.7 BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P Administrative Protective Order These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). Dated: December 21, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum 19 CFR 351.224(b). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:47 Dec 29, 2020 Jkt 253001 Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to the Service Pier Extension Project on Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Washington National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Issuance of a modified incidental harassment authorization. AGENCY: In accordance with the regulations implementing the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA), as amended, notification is hereby given that NMFS has issued a modified incidental harassment authorization (IHA) to United States Navy (Navy) to incidentally harass marine mammals incidental to the Service Pier Extension (SPE) project at Naval Base Kitsap Bangor, Washington. DATES: This modified IHA is valid from the original date of issuance through July 15, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Pauline, Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 427–8401. Electronic copies of the original application and supporting documents (including NMFS Federal Register notices of the original proposed and SUMMARY: Notification to Interested Parties 7 See National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XA736] This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 315.305(A)(3). Timely written notification of the return/ destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. I. Summary II. Background III. Scope of the Order IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse Inferences V. Subsidies Valuation Information VI. Analysis of Programs DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE PO 00000 Frm 00010 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 final authorizations, and the previous IHA), as well as a list of the references cited in this document, may be obtained online at: https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/permit/ incidental-take-authorizations-undermarine-mammal-protection-act. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed above. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background The MMPA prohibits the ‘‘take’’ of marine mammals, with certain exceptions. Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the MMPA (16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed incidental take authorization may be provided to the public for review. Authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s) and will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or stock(s) for taking for subsistence uses (where relevant). Further, NMFS must prescribe the permissible methods of taking and other ‘‘means of effecting the least practicable adverse impact’’ on the affected species or stocks and their habitat, paying particular attention to rookeries, mating grounds, and areas of similar significance, and on the availability of such species or stocks for taking for certain subsistence uses (referred to in shorthand as ‘‘mitigation’’); and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth. History of Request On June 28, 2018, NMFS published a notice of our issuance of an IHA authorizing take of five species of marine mammals by Level A and Level B harassment incidental to the SPE project (83 FR 30406). Species authorized for take included killer whale (Orcinus orca), harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena), California sea lion (Zalophus californianus), Steller sea lion (Eumetopias jubatus), and harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). The effective dates of that IHA were July 16, 2019 through July 15, 2020. On February 4, 2019, the Navy informed NMFS that the project was being E:\FR\FM\30DEN1.SGM 30DEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 250 (Wednesday, December 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 86537-86538]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28789]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-533-876]


Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber From India: Final Results of 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Reliance 
Industries Limited (Reliance) received countervailable subsidies that 
are above de minimis during the period of review, November 6, 2017 
through December 31, 2018.

DATES: Applicable December 30, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ariela Garvett, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3609.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On April 3, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of 
this review.\1\ On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in 
administrative reviews by 50 days.\2\ On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled 
all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days,\3\ 
thereby extending the deadline for these final results until November 
19, 2020. On November 5, 2020, Commerce postponed the final results of 
this review by 33 days until December 22, 2020.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from the Republic of 
India: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review, 85 FR 18916 (April 3, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and 
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to 
Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,'' dated April 24, 2020.
    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' dated July 21, 2020.
    \4\ See Memorandum, ``2017-2018 Countervailing Duty 
Administrative Review of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from 
India: Extension of Deadline for Final Results,'' dated November 5, 
2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is fine denier polyester 
staple fiber (fine denier PSF). For a complete description of the scope 
of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the interested parties' case and rebuttal 
briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A summary 
of the events that occurred since Commerce published the Preliminary 
Results, as well as a full discussion of the issues raised by parties 
for these final results, are discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\5\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document 
and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's 
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service 
System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the 
issues raised by interested parties and responded to by Commerce in the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in the Appendix to this 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results in the 2017-2018 Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review of Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber from India,'' dated 
concurrently, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and 
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Methodology

    Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 
For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that 
there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution 
that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is 
specific.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5)(A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For a description of the methodology underlying Commerce's 
conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of the comments received from interested 
parties and record information, we made certain changes to the net 
subsidy rate calculated for Reliance. For a discussion of these 
changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of the Administrative Review

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.221(B)(5), we find the net countervailable subsidy rate for the 
period November 6, 2017 through December 31, 2018 to be as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Subsidy rate
                          Company                            (percent ad
                                                              valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reliance Industries Limited...............................         4.44
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment and Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue 
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 
days after the date of publication of these final results to liquidate 
shipments of subject merchandise. We will instruct CBP to liquidate 
shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or

[[Page 86538]]

exported by Reliance entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for 
consumption on or after November 6, 2017 through December 31, 2018, at 
the ad valorem assessment rate listed above for Reliance.
    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend also 
to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties in the amounts shown above on shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-
reviewed firms, Commerce will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash 
deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-
specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. 
These cash deposit rates, when imposed, shall remain in effect until 
further notice.

Disclosure

    Commerce intends to disclose the calculations and analysis 
performed for these final results to interested parties within five 
days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal 
Register.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See 19 CFR 351.224(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 315.305(A)(3). Timely written 
notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion 
to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply 
with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable 
violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

    Dated: December 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix--List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and Application of Adverse 
Inferences
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Discussion of the Issues
    Comment 1: Sales Value Denominators
    Comment 2: Whether To Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) To 
Export Sales Values
    Comment 3: Discount Rates
    Comment 4: Calculation of Duty Exemptions Under the Special 
Economic Zone (SEZ) Duty-Free Importation of Capital Goods and Raw 
Materials, Components, Consumables, Intermediates, Spare Parts, and 
Packing Materials Program and Export Promotion of Capital Goods 
Scheme (EPCGS)
    Comment 5: Application of AFA to the SEZ Duty-Free Importation 
of Capital Goods and Raw Materials, Components, Consumables, 
Intermediates, Spare Parts, and Packing Materials Program and EPCGS
    Comment 6: Land Benchmark
    Comment 7: Whether the SEZ Programs, Technology Upgradation Fund 
Scheme (TUFS), and Merchandise Export From India Scheme (MEIS) Are 
Countervailable
VIII. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2020-28789 Filed 12-29-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.