Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Rules Establishing Maximum Fee Rates To Be Charged by Member Organizations for Forwarding Proxy and Other Materials to Beneficial Owners, 83119-83121 [2020-28010]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–90677; File No. SR–NYSE–
2020–96]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New
York Stock Exchange LLC; Notice of
Filing of Proposed Rule Change
Amending Its Rules Establishing
Maximum Fee Rates To Be Charged by
Member Organizations for Forwarding
Proxy and Other Materials to Beneficial
Owners
December 15, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on December
2, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘NYSE’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by the selfregulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its
rules establishing maximum fee rates to
be charged by member organizations for
forwarding proxy materials to beneficial
owners. The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:33 Dec 18, 2020
Jkt 253001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
Rule 451 requires NYSE member
organizations that hold securities for
beneficial owners in street name to
solicit proxies from, and deliver proxy
and issuer communication materials to,
beneficial owners on behalf of issuers.4
For this service, issuers reimburse NYSE
member organizations for out-of-pocket,
reasonable clerical, postage and other
expenses incurred for a particular
distribution. This reimbursement
structure stems from SEC Rules 14b–1
and 14b–2 under the Act,5 which
impose obligations on companies and
nominees to ensure that beneficial
owners receive proxy materials and are
given the opportunity to vote. These
rules require companies to send their
proxy materials to nominees, i.e.,
broker-dealers or banks that hold
securities in street name, for forwarding
to beneficial owners and to pay
nominees for reasonable expenses, both
direct and indirect, incurred in
providing proxy information to
beneficial owners. The Commission’s
rules do not specify the fees that
nominees can charge issuers for proxy
distribution; rather, they state that
issuers must reimburse the nominees for
‘‘reasonable expenses’’ incurred.6
Currently, the Supplementary
Material to NYSE Rules 451 and 465
establish the fee structure for which a
NYSE member organization may be
reimbursed for expenses incurred in
connection with distributing proxy
materials to beneficial shareholders.
This fee structure is also replicated in
Section 402.10 of the NYSE Listed
Company Manual. The NYSE fee
4 The ownership of shares in street name means
that a shareholder, or ‘‘beneficial owner,’’ has
purchased shares through a broker-dealer or bank,
also known as a ‘‘nominee.’’ In contrast to direct
ownership, where shares are directly registered in
the name of the shareholder, shares held in street
name are registered in the name of the nominee, or
in the nominee name of a depository, such as the
Depository Trust Company. For more detail
regarding share ownership, see Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 62495 (July 14, 2010), 75 FR 42982
(July 22, 2010) (Concept Release on the U.S. Proxy
System) (‘‘Proxy Concept Release’’).
5 17 CFR 240.14b–1; 17 CFR 240.14b–2.
6 In adopting the direct shareholder
communications rules in the early 1980s, the
Commission left the determination of reasonable
costs to the self-regulatory organizations (‘‘SROs’’)
because they were deemed to be in the best position
to make fair evaluations and allocations of costs
associated with these rules. See Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 20021 (July 28, 1983), 48 FR 35082
(August 3, 1983); see also Securities Exchange Act
Release No. 45644 (March 25, 2002), 67 FR 15440,
15440 n.8 (April 1, 2002).
PO 00000
Frm 00093
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
83119
structure represents the maximum
approved rates that an issuer can be
billed for proxy distribution services
absent prior notification to and consent
of the issuer.
All the SROs whose member
organizations hold securities on behalf
of street name holders have rules
requiring their member organizations to
forward proxy materials and other
distributions on behalf of companies to
street name account holders. The rules
of all other exchanges simply provide
that member organizations must
undertake this activity if they receive
‘‘reasonable’’ reimbursement, without
specifying any schedule of maximum
permitted charges.7 By contrast, FINRA
includes a specific schedule of
maximum charges that is substantively
identical to that of the NYSE.8
Given the significant evolution of the
securities industry during the period in
which the NYSE has taken the lead in
establishing proxy distribution
reimbursement rates, the NYSE does not
believe that it is best positioned to
retain this responsibility going forward.
All the NYSE member organizations that
are subject to the NYSE fee schedule are
also members of FINRA. In addition, all
of the brokers who are not NYSE
members but who hold shares on behalf
of street name account holders are also
FINRA members. Furthermore, a large
percentage of the affected listed issuers
are listed on Nasdaq, CBOE or other
non-NYSE Group exchanges or are not
listed on any national securities
exchange, while the development of the
7 See, e.g., BZX Exchange, Inc. Rule 13.3; see also
Investors Exchange Rulebook 6.130.
8 See FINRA Rule 2251. The Exchange notes that
FINRA Rule 2251 differs from Rule 451 in one
respect. Section 5 (Notice and Access Fees) of
Supplementary Material .90 of Rule 451 provides
that the Notice and Access fees set forth therein will
also be charged with respect to the distribution of
investment company shareholder reports pursuant
to any ‘‘notice and access’’ rules adopted by the
SEC in relation to such distributions and that such
fee will not be charged for any account with respect
to which an investment company pays a Preference
Management Fee in connection with a distribution
of investment company shareholder reports. It
further provides that, in calculating the rates at
which the issuer will be charged Notice and Access
fees for investment company shareholder report
distributions, all accounts holding shares of any
class of stock of the applicable issuer eligible to
receive the same distribution will be aggregated in
determining the appropriate pricing tier under this
Section 5 (Notice and Access Fees) of
Supplementary Material .90 of Rule 451. FINRA has
not adopted this text as part of FINRA Rule 2251.
Pursuant to Rule 30e–3 under the Investment
Company Act of 1940, the SEC has adopted a
‘‘notice and access’’ rule for investment companies.
Investment companies that have met the
requirements of Rule 30e–3(i)(1)(i) are permitted to
utilize this ‘‘notice and access’’ approach for
distributions to beneficial owners beginning
January 1, 2021. See also Rule 30e–3(i)(1)(ii) for
other transition period requirements.
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
83120
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices
mutual fund industry has led to the
existence of a huge number of issuers
who must pay these costs but have no
relationship with any listing exchange.
The current fee schedule has been in
place since 2013 9 and a comprehensive
review of fee levels may be necessary in
the near future to respond to the
continuing evolution in both technology
and the securities ownership patterns of
investors since that time. All of the
brokers who hold shares on behalf of
street name account holders are FINRA
members, while only a subset of them
are members of the NYSE. Furthermore,
a large and increasing number of the
affected issuers are listed on Nasdaq,
CBOE or other non-NYSE Group
exchanges or are traded solely over the
counter, while the development of the
mutual fund industry has led to the
existence of a huge number of issuers
who are not listed on any exchange.
In response to the developments
described above. the NYSE proposes to
amend Rule 451 by deleting the fee
schedule and replacing it with text
comparable to that of other exchanges
providing that member organizations are
entitled to receive fair and reasonable
rates of reimbursement for all out-ofpocket expenses, including reasonable
clerical expenses, incurred in
connection with proxy solicitations and
the processing of proxy and other
material required under Rule 451. In
addition, the amended rule text will
provide that member organizations must
comply with any schedule of approved
charges set forth in the rules of any
other national securities exchange or
association of which such member
organization is a member. As all NYSE
member organizations subject to the
NYSE fee schedule are also members of
FINRA, this provision will effectively
require member organizations to comply
with the fee schedule set forth in FINRA
Rule 2551.
The Exchange proposes to delete
Section 402.10 of the Manual in its
entirety as it is identical to provisions
with respect to issuers other than
mutual funds as set forth in Rule 451
and is therefore redundant.
Rule 465 governs the role of NYSE
member organizations in distributing on
behalf of issuers interim reports and
other materials to ‘‘street name’’ account
holders. Supplementary Material .20 to
Rule 465 specifies that these
distributions are subject to the fee
schedule set forth in Supplementary
Material 90–95 to Rule 451. The
9 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70720
(October 18, 2013), 78 FR 63530 (October 24, 2013)
(SR–NYSE–2013–07) (order approving the most
recent comprehensive amendments to the NYSE fee
schedule).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:33 Dec 18, 2020
Jkt 253001
Exchange proposes to delete the current
text of Supplementary Material .20 to
Rule 465 and replace it with a paragraph
that parallels the proposed new form of
Supplementary Material .90 to Rule 451,
providing that, in determining fair and
reasonable rates of reimbursement for
all out-of-pocket expenses, including
reasonable clerical expenses, incurred
in connection with copies of interim
reports of earnings or other material
being sent to stockholders pursuant to
Rule 465, member organizations must
comply with any schedule of approved
charges set forth in the rules of any
other national securities exchange or
association of which such member
organization is a member.
The Exchange notes that this proposal
is in no way intended to take a position
on the appropriateness of the fee
schedules for proxy and other
distributions currently set forth in Rules
451 and 465 or in the rules of any other
national securities exchange or national
securities association. The sole purpose
of this proposal is obtain approval to
delete the fee schedules from the NYSE
rules and establish in their place a
requirement to comply with the fee
provisions set forth in the rules of any
other national securities organization or
national securities association of which
an NYSE member organization is a
member.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its
proposal is consistent with Section 6(b)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ‘‘Act’’) generally.10 Section
6(b)(4) 11 requires that exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of
reasonable dues, fees, and other charges
among its members and issuers and
other persons using the facilities of an
exchange. Section 6(b)(5) 12 requires,
among other things, that exchange rules
are designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of
trade, to foster cooperation and
coordination with persons engaged in
facilitating transactions in securities, to
remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market
and a national market system, and, in
general, to protect the public interest
and the interests of investors, promote
just and equitable principles of trade
and that they are not designed to permit
unfair discrimination between issuers,
brokers or dealers. Section 6(b)(8) 13
prohibits any exchange rule from
10 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
12 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
13 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
11 15
PO 00000
Frm 00094
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
imposing any burden on competition
that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act as it will
not result in any substantive change in
the reimbursement rates received by
member organizations for proxy and
other document distributions on behalf
of issuers, as all NYSE member
organizations are also subject to the fee
schedule set forth in FINRA rules.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is also consistent with Section
6(b)(5) of the Act in that it is designed
to promote just and equitable principles
of trade, perfect the mechanism of a free
and open market and promote just and
equitable principles of trade. The
maximum reimbursement rates brokers
receive for making distributions of
proxies and other materials on behalf of
issuers will continue to be determined
by FINRA, the self-regulatory
organization of which all affected
brokers are members.
As discussed above, all NYSE member
organizations subject to these rules are
also members of FINRA and,
consequently, subject to the fee
schedule set forth in FINRA Rule 2251.
As the schedule set forth in FINRA Rule
2251 is substantively identical to the
NYSE’s current fee schedule, there will
be no substantive change in the
maximum rates NYSE member
organizations may charge as a result of
the proposed amendments.
All of the brokers who hold shares on
behalf of street name account holders
are FINRA members, while only a
subset of them are also members of the
NYSE. Furthermore, a large and
increasing number of the affected
issuers are listed on Nasdaq, CBOE or
other non-NYSE Group exchanges or are
traded solely over the counter, while the
development of the mutual fund
industry has led to the existence of a
huge number of issuers who must pay
these costs but have no relationship
with any listing exchange. Notably,
while mutual funds are not listed on
any exchange, they are all held
primarily in ‘‘street name’’ accounts at
brokers that are members of FINRA.
The Exchange believes that the
proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(8), as it does not impose any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. All of the
NYSE member organizations that are
subject to the fee schedule in the current
forms of Rules 451 and 465 are also
subject to the identical provisions of
FINRA Rule 2251. Consequently, the
proposed rule change will have no effect
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 245 / Monday, December 21, 2020 / Notices
on competition among brokers, as they
will all continue to be subject to the
same maximum fee schedule. For the
same reason there will be no effect on
the competition among issuers resulting
from the proposed rule change, as all
issuers will remain subject to the same
maximum fee schedule as applied under
the FINRA rule. As all of the issuers
listed on all of the national securities
exchanges are currently obligated to pay
the same maximum fees under the
current NYSE rules and FIRNA Rule
2251, the proposal will also have no
effect on the competition for listings
among the national securities
exchanges. For the foregoing reasons,
the Exchange believes that the proposal
does not impose any burden on
competition that that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. All of the
NYSE member organizations that are
subject to the fee schedule in the current
forms of Rules 451 and 465 are also
subject to the identical provisions of
FINRA Rule 2251. Consequently, the
proposed rule change will have no effect
on competition among brokers, as they
will all continue to be subject to the
same maximum fee schedule. For the
same reason there will be no effect on
the competition among issuers resulting
from the proposed rule change, as all
issuers will remain subject to the same
maximum fee schedule as applied under
the FINRA rule. As all of the issuers
listed on all of the national securities
exchanges are currently obligated to pay
the same maximum fees under the
current NYSE rules and FIRNA Rule
2251, the proposal will also have no
effect on the competition for listings
among the national securities
exchanges. For the foregoing reasons,
the Exchange believes that the proposal
does not impose any burden on
competition that that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited
or received with respect to the proposed
rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:33 Dec 18, 2020
Jkt 253001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds
such longer period to be appropriate
and publishes its reasons for so finding
or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
NYSE–2020–96 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to: Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2020–96. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
Frm 00095
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–NYSE–2020–96 and should
be submitted on or before January 11,
2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.14
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–28010 Filed 12–18–20; 8:45 am]
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
PO 00000
83121
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–90675; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2020–54]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing of
Amendment No. 1 and Order Instituting
Proceedings To Determine Whether To
Approve or Disapprove a Proposed
Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendment No. 1, To Amend NYSE
Arca Rule 5.3–E To Exempt Registered
Investment Companies That List
Certain Categories of the Securities
Defined as Derivative and Special
Purpose Securities Under NYSE Arca
Rules From Having To Obtain
Shareholder Approval Prior to the
Issuance of Securities in Connection
With Certain Acquisitions of the Stock
or Assets of an Affiliated Company
December 15, 2020.
I. Introduction
On August 28, 2020, NYSE Arca, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘NYSE Arca’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’), pursuant
to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’ or
‘‘Exchange Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4
thereunder,2 a proposed rule change to
amend NYSE Arca Rule 5.3–E
(Corporate Governance and Disclosure
Policies) to exempt certain categories of
derivative and special purpose
securities from the requirement to
obtain shareholder approval prior to the
issuance of securities in connection
with certain acquisitions of the stock or
assets of another company. The
14 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 245 (Monday, December 21, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 83119-83121]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28010]
[[Page 83119]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-90677; File No. SR-NYSE-2020-96]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; New York Stock Exchange LLC;
Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule Change Amending Its Rules
Establishing Maximum Fee Rates To Be Charged by Member Organizations
for Forwarding Proxy and Other Materials to Beneficial Owners
December 15, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby
given that, on December 2, 2020, New York Stock Exchange LLC (``NYSE''
or the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the self-
regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
\3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend its rules establishing maximum fee
rates to be charged by member organizations for forwarding proxy
materials to beneficial owners. The proposed rule change is available
on the Exchange's website at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization
included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most
significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
Rule 451 requires NYSE member organizations that hold securities
for beneficial owners in street name to solicit proxies from, and
deliver proxy and issuer communication materials to, beneficial owners
on behalf of issuers.\4\ For this service, issuers reimburse NYSE
member organizations for out-of-pocket, reasonable clerical, postage
and other expenses incurred for a particular distribution. This
reimbursement structure stems from SEC Rules 14b-1 and 14b-2 under the
Act,\5\ which impose obligations on companies and nominees to ensure
that beneficial owners receive proxy materials and are given the
opportunity to vote. These rules require companies to send their proxy
materials to nominees, i.e., broker-dealers or banks that hold
securities in street name, for forwarding to beneficial owners and to
pay nominees for reasonable expenses, both direct and indirect,
incurred in providing proxy information to beneficial owners. The
Commission's rules do not specify the fees that nominees can charge
issuers for proxy distribution; rather, they state that issuers must
reimburse the nominees for ``reasonable expenses'' incurred.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The ownership of shares in street name means that a
shareholder, or ``beneficial owner,'' has purchased shares through a
broker-dealer or bank, also known as a ``nominee.'' In contrast to
direct ownership, where shares are directly registered in the name
of the shareholder, shares held in street name are registered in the
name of the nominee, or in the nominee name of a depository, such as
the Depository Trust Company. For more detail regarding share
ownership, see Securities Exchange Act Release No. 62495 (July 14,
2010), 75 FR 42982 (July 22, 2010) (Concept Release on the U.S.
Proxy System) (``Proxy Concept Release'').
\5\ 17 CFR 240.14b-1; 17 CFR 240.14b-2.
\6\ In adopting the direct shareholder communications rules in
the early 1980s, the Commission left the determination of reasonable
costs to the self-regulatory organizations (``SROs'') because they
were deemed to be in the best position to make fair evaluations and
allocations of costs associated with these rules. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 20021 (July 28, 1983), 48 FR 35082 (August
3, 1983); see also Securities Exchange Act Release No. 45644 (March
25, 2002), 67 FR 15440, 15440 n.8 (April 1, 2002).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Currently, the Supplementary Material to NYSE Rules 451 and 465
establish the fee structure for which a NYSE member organization may be
reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with distributing proxy
materials to beneficial shareholders. This fee structure is also
replicated in Section 402.10 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. The
NYSE fee structure represents the maximum approved rates that an issuer
can be billed for proxy distribution services absent prior notification
to and consent of the issuer.
All the SROs whose member organizations hold securities on behalf
of street name holders have rules requiring their member organizations
to forward proxy materials and other distributions on behalf of
companies to street name account holders. The rules of all other
exchanges simply provide that member organizations must undertake this
activity if they receive ``reasonable'' reimbursement, without
specifying any schedule of maximum permitted charges.\7\ By contrast,
FINRA includes a specific schedule of maximum charges that is
substantively identical to that of the NYSE.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See, e.g., BZX Exchange, Inc. Rule 13.3; see also Investors
Exchange Rulebook 6.130.
\8\ See FINRA Rule 2251. The Exchange notes that FINRA Rule 2251
differs from Rule 451 in one respect. Section 5 (Notice and Access
Fees) of Supplementary Material .90 of Rule 451 provides that the
Notice and Access fees set forth therein will also be charged with
respect to the distribution of investment company shareholder
reports pursuant to any ``notice and access'' rules adopted by the
SEC in relation to such distributions and that such fee will not be
charged for any account with respect to which an investment company
pays a Preference Management Fee in connection with a distribution
of investment company shareholder reports. It further provides that,
in calculating the rates at which the issuer will be charged Notice
and Access fees for investment company shareholder report
distributions, all accounts holding shares of any class of stock of
the applicable issuer eligible to receive the same distribution will
be aggregated in determining the appropriate pricing tier under this
Section 5 (Notice and Access Fees) of Supplementary Material .90 of
Rule 451. FINRA has not adopted this text as part of FINRA Rule
2251. Pursuant to Rule 30e-3 under the Investment Company Act of
1940, the SEC has adopted a ``notice and access'' rule for
investment companies. Investment companies that have met the
requirements of Rule 30e-3(i)(1)(i) are permitted to utilize this
``notice and access'' approach for distributions to beneficial
owners beginning January 1, 2021. See also Rule 30e-3(i)(1)(ii) for
other transition period requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the significant evolution of the securities industry during
the period in which the NYSE has taken the lead in establishing proxy
distribution reimbursement rates, the NYSE does not believe that it is
best positioned to retain this responsibility going forward. All the
NYSE member organizations that are subject to the NYSE fee schedule are
also members of FINRA. In addition, all of the brokers who are not NYSE
members but who hold shares on behalf of street name account holders
are also FINRA members. Furthermore, a large percentage of the affected
listed issuers are listed on Nasdaq, CBOE or other non-NYSE Group
exchanges or are not listed on any national securities exchange, while
the development of the
[[Page 83120]]
mutual fund industry has led to the existence of a huge number of
issuers who must pay these costs but have no relationship with any
listing exchange.
The current fee schedule has been in place since 2013 \9\ and a
comprehensive review of fee levels may be necessary in the near future
to respond to the continuing evolution in both technology and the
securities ownership patterns of investors since that time. All of the
brokers who hold shares on behalf of street name account holders are
FINRA members, while only a subset of them are members of the NYSE.
Furthermore, a large and increasing number of the affected issuers are
listed on Nasdaq, CBOE or other non-NYSE Group exchanges or are traded
solely over the counter, while the development of the mutual fund
industry has led to the existence of a huge number of issuers who are
not listed on any exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 70720 (October 18,
2013), 78 FR 63530 (October 24, 2013) (SR-NYSE-2013-07) (order
approving the most recent comprehensive amendments to the NYSE fee
schedule).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In response to the developments described above. the NYSE proposes
to amend Rule 451 by deleting the fee schedule and replacing it with
text comparable to that of other exchanges providing that member
organizations are entitled to receive fair and reasonable rates of
reimbursement for all out-of-pocket expenses, including reasonable
clerical expenses, incurred in connection with proxy solicitations and
the processing of proxy and other material required under Rule 451. In
addition, the amended rule text will provide that member organizations
must comply with any schedule of approved charges set forth in the
rules of any other national securities exchange or association of which
such member organization is a member. As all NYSE member organizations
subject to the NYSE fee schedule are also members of FINRA, this
provision will effectively require member organizations to comply with
the fee schedule set forth in FINRA Rule 2551.
The Exchange proposes to delete Section 402.10 of the Manual in its
entirety as it is identical to provisions with respect to issuers other
than mutual funds as set forth in Rule 451 and is therefore redundant.
Rule 465 governs the role of NYSE member organizations in
distributing on behalf of issuers interim reports and other materials
to ``street name'' account holders. Supplementary Material .20 to Rule
465 specifies that these distributions are subject to the fee schedule
set forth in Supplementary Material 90-95 to Rule 451. The Exchange
proposes to delete the current text of Supplementary Material .20 to
Rule 465 and replace it with a paragraph that parallels the proposed
new form of Supplementary Material .90 to Rule 451, providing that, in
determining fair and reasonable rates of reimbursement for all out-of-
pocket expenses, including reasonable clerical expenses, incurred in
connection with copies of interim reports of earnings or other material
being sent to stockholders pursuant to Rule 465, member organizations
must comply with any schedule of approved charges set forth in the
rules of any other national securities exchange or association of which
such member organization is a member.
The Exchange notes that this proposal is in no way intended to take
a position on the appropriateness of the fee schedules for proxy and
other distributions currently set forth in Rules 451 and 465 or in the
rules of any other national securities exchange or national securities
association. The sole purpose of this proposal is obtain approval to
delete the fee schedules from the NYSE rules and establish in their
place a requirement to comply with the fee provisions set forth in the
rules of any other national securities organization or national
securities association of which an NYSE member organization is a
member.
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section
6(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'')
generally.\10\ Section 6(b)(4) \11\ requires that exchange rules
provide for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees, and
other charges among its members and issuers and other persons using the
facilities of an exchange. Section 6(b)(5) \12\ requires, among other
things, that exchange rules are designed to prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with
persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove
impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and
a national market system, and, in general, to protect the public
interest and the interests of investors, promote just and equitable
principles of trade and that they are not designed to permit unfair
discrimination between issuers, brokers or dealers. Section 6(b)(8)
\13\ prohibits any exchange rule from imposing any burden on
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4).
\12\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(8).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Sections
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act as it will not result in any substantive
change in the reimbursement rates received by member organizations for
proxy and other document distributions on behalf of issuers, as all
NYSE member organizations are also subject to the fee schedule set
forth in FINRA rules.
The Exchange believes that the proposal is also consistent with
Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that it is designed to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, perfect the mechanism of a free and open
market and promote just and equitable principles of trade. The maximum
reimbursement rates brokers receive for making distributions of proxies
and other materials on behalf of issuers will continue to be determined
by FINRA, the self-regulatory organization of which all affected
brokers are members.
As discussed above, all NYSE member organizations subject to these
rules are also members of FINRA and, consequently, subject to the fee
schedule set forth in FINRA Rule 2251. As the schedule set forth in
FINRA Rule 2251 is substantively identical to the NYSE's current fee
schedule, there will be no substantive change in the maximum rates NYSE
member organizations may charge as a result of the proposed amendments.
All of the brokers who hold shares on behalf of street name account
holders are FINRA members, while only a subset of them are also members
of the NYSE. Furthermore, a large and increasing number of the affected
issuers are listed on Nasdaq, CBOE or other non-NYSE Group exchanges or
are traded solely over the counter, while the development of the mutual
fund industry has led to the existence of a huge number of issuers who
must pay these costs but have no relationship with any listing
exchange. Notably, while mutual funds are not listed on any exchange,
they are all held primarily in ``street name'' accounts at brokers that
are members of FINRA.
The Exchange believes that the proposal is consistent with Section
6(b)(8), as it does not impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. All
of the NYSE member organizations that are subject to the fee schedule
in the current forms of Rules 451 and 465 are also subject to the
identical provisions of FINRA Rule 2251. Consequently, the proposed
rule change will have no effect
[[Page 83121]]
on competition among brokers, as they will all continue to be subject
to the same maximum fee schedule. For the same reason there will be no
effect on the competition among issuers resulting from the proposed
rule change, as all issuers will remain subject to the same maximum fee
schedule as applied under the FINRA rule. As all of the issuers listed
on all of the national securities exchanges are currently obligated to
pay the same maximum fees under the current NYSE rules and FIRNA Rule
2251, the proposal will also have no effect on the competition for
listings among the national securities exchanges. For the foregoing
reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal does not impose any
burden on competition that that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. All of the NYSE member
organizations that are subject to the fee schedule in the current forms
of Rules 451 and 465 are also subject to the identical provisions of
FINRA Rule 2251. Consequently, the proposed rule change will have no
effect on competition among brokers, as they will all continue to be
subject to the same maximum fee schedule. For the same reason there
will be no effect on the competition among issuers resulting from the
proposed rule change, as all issuers will remain subject to the same
maximum fee schedule as applied under the FINRA rule. As all of the
issuers listed on all of the national securities exchanges are
currently obligated to pay the same maximum fees under the current NYSE
rules and FIRNA Rule 2251, the proposal will also have no effect on the
competition for listings among the national securities exchanges. For
the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposal does not
impose any burden on competition that that is not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may designate
if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-NYSE-2020-96 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to: Secretary,
Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-96. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-NYSE-2020-96 and should be submitted on
or before January 11, 2021.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-28010 Filed 12-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P