Certain Electric Shavers and Components and Accessories Thereof; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Granting a Motion for Benepuri LLC To Intervene and To Terminate Respondent Rayenbarny Inc. for Good Cause, 82514-82515 [2020-28038]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
82514
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices
Estimated Completion Time per
Response: See table below.
Total Estimated Annual Burden
Hours: 8,840 hours.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Frequency of Collection: Annually.
the acreage limitation provisions of
Federal reclamation law.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Respondents: 177.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 221.
Burden
estimate per
form
(in hours)
Form no.
Number of
respondents
Annual
number of
responses
Annual burden
on
respondents
(in hours)
7–21SUMM–C and associated tabulation sheets ...........................................
7–21SUMM–R and associated tabulation sheets ...........................................
40
40
169
8
211
10
8,440
400
Totals ........................................................................................................
........................
177
22121
8,840
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor and a person is not required to
respond to a collection of information
unless it displays a currently valid OMB
control number.
The authority for this action is the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Christopher J. Beardsley,
Director, Policy and Programs.
[FR Doc. 2020–27895 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4332–90–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1550–1553
(Preliminary)]
Polyester Textured Yarn From
Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and
Vietnam; Determinations
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
an industry in the United States is
materially injured by reason of imports
of polyester textured yarn from
Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, and
Vietnam, provided for in subheadings
5402.33.30 and 5402.33.60 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, that are alleged to be sold
in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’).2
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Total Estimated Annual Nonhour
Burden Cost: None.
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigation
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 85 FR 74680 (November 23, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:22 Dec 17, 2020
Jkt 253001
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
investigations under § 733(b) of the Act,
or, if the preliminary determinations are
negative, upon notice of affirmative
final determinations in those
investigations under § 735(a) of the Act.
Parties that filed entries of appearance
in the preliminary phase of the
investigations need not enter a separate
appearance for the final phase of the
investigations. Industrial users, and, if
the merchandise under investigation is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations have the right
to appear as parties in Commission
antidumping investigations. The
Secretary will prepare a public service
list containing the names and addresses
of all persons, or their representatives,
who are parties to the investigations.
Background
On October 28, 2020, Nan Ya Plastics
Corp. America, Lake City, South
Carolina and Unifi Manufacturing, Inc.,
Greensboro, North Carolina filed a
petition with the Commission and
Commerce, alleging that an industry in
the United States is materially injured
or threatened with material injury by
reason of LTFV imports of polyester
textured yarn from Indonesia, Malaysia,
Thailand, and Vietnam. Accordingly,
effective October 28, 2020, the
Commission instituted antidumping
duty investigation Nos. 731–TA–1550–
1553 (Preliminary).
Notice of the institution of the
Commission’s investigations and of a
public conference to be held in
connection therewith was given by
posting copies of the notice in the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00089
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the Secretary, U.S. International
Trade Commission, Washington, DC,
and by publishing the notice in the
Federal Register of November 3, 2020
(85 FR 69643). In light of the restrictions
on access to the Commission building
due to the COVID–19 pandemic, the
Commission conducted its conference
through written testimony and video
conference. All persons who requested
the opportunity were permitted to
participate.
The Commission made these
determinations pursuant to § 733(a) of
the Act (19 U.S.C. 1673b(a)). It
completed and filed its determinations
in these investigations on December 14,
2020. The views of the Commission are
contained in USITC Publication 5148
(December 2020), entitled Polyester
Textured Yarn from Indonesia,
Malaysia, Thailand, and Vietnam:
Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1550–1553
(Preliminary).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 14, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–27855 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1230]
Certain Electric Shavers and
Components and Accessories Thereof;
Notice of a Commission Determination
Not To Review an Initial Determination
Granting a Motion for Benepuri LLC To
Intervene and To Terminate
Respondent Rayenbarny Inc. for Good
Cause
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
18DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 244 / Friday, December 18, 2020 / Notices
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission (‘‘Commission’’) has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 4) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’), granting a motion by Benepuri
LLC of Menands, New York
(‘‘Benepuri’’) to intervene in the abovereferenced investigation and to
terminate the investigation as to
respondent Rayenbarny Inc. of New
York, New York (‘‘Rayenbarny’’).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
205–3179. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
(202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On
November 18, 2020, the Commission
instituted this investigation based on a
complaint filed by Skull Shaver, LLC of
Moorestown, New Jersey (‘‘Skull
Shaver’’). 85 FR 73510–11 (Nov. 18,
2020). The complaint alleged violations
of section 337 based on the importation
into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain electric shavers and components
and accessories thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 8,726,528 and D672,504. Id.
The Commission’s notice of
investigation named the following
eleven entities as respondents:
Rayenbarny; Bald Shaver Inc. of
Toronto, Canada; Suzhou Kaidiya
Garments Trading Co., Ltd. d.b.a.
‘‘Digimator’’ of Suzhou, China;
Shenzhen Aiweilai Trading Co., Ltd.
d.b.a. ‘‘Teamyo’’ of Shenzhen, China;
Wenzhou Wending Electric Appliance
Co., Ltd. of Yueqing City, China;
Shenzhen Nukun Technology Co., Ltd.
d.b.a. ‘‘OriHea’’ of Shenzhen, China;
Yiwu Xingye Network Technology Co.
Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘Roziapro’’ of Yiwu, China;
Magicfly LLC of Hong Kong; Yiwu City
Qiaoyu Trading Co., Ltd. of Yiwu,
China; Shenzhen Wantong Information
Technology Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘WTONG’’
of Shenzhen, China; and Shenzhen
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
22:22 Dec 17, 2020
Jkt 253001
Junmao International Technology Co.,
Ltd. d.b.a. ‘‘Homeas’’ of Shenzhen,
China. The notice of investigation also
named the Office of Unfair Import
Investigations (‘‘OUII’’) as a party. Id.
On November 18, 2020, Benepuri
filed a motion to intervene in this
investigation, asserting that it has an
interest in the investigation because one
of its products has been accused and
that no other named respondent has an
interest in defending Benepuri’s
product. Benepuri also moved for
termination of Rayenbarny as a
respondent, stating that the accused
product attributed to Rayenbarny, the
AsaVea electric shaver, is actually
Benepuri’s product. Attached to
Benepuri’s motion is a declaration from
the President of Rayenbarny, stating that
‘‘Rayenbarny Inc. has not imported into
the United States, sold for importation
into the United States, or sold in the
United States after importation an
electric shaver’’ and that ‘‘[t]o the best
of my knowledge, the AsaVea electric
shaver that is identified in the
Complaint in the above referenced
Investigation is a product from Benepuri
LLC.’’ Benepuri Motion, Exhibit B. On
November 23, 2020, Skull Shaver and
OUII filed responses in support of
Benepuri’s intervention and
Rayenbarny’s termination.
On November 30, 2020, the ALJ
issued the subject ID granting the
motion. Regarding Benepuri’s
intervention, the ID finds that the
motion complies with the requirements
of Commission Rule 210.19. 19 CFR
210.19. Specifically, the ID finds that (1)
‘‘Benepuri’s motion to intervene was
timely filed because it was made on the
same day as the November 18, 2020
institution of this Investigation’’; (2)
‘‘Benepuri has demonstrated a
substantial interest in the
Investigation,’’ particularly in
connection with the accused AsaVea
electric shaver; and (3) ‘‘Benepuri’s
interests are not represented by existing
parties.’’ ID at 5. Thus, the ID finds that
‘‘Benepuri’s intervention in this
Investigation is appropriate, and
Benepuri should be accorded status as
a respondent.’’ Id. at 5–6 (citing
Network Interface Cards, Inv. No. 337–
TA–455, Comm’n Op. at 10 (July 17,
2001) (a party seeking to intervene
should be accorded respondent status
when it could itself be a respondent in
the investigation, but has been omitted
by the complainant for some reason)).
The ID also finds that good cause
exists to terminate the investigation as
to Rayenbarny under Commission Rule
210.21(a), which provides that ‘‘[a]ny
party may move at any time prior to the
issuance of an initial determination on
PO 00000
Frm 00090
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
82515
violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act
of 1930 to terminate an investigation in
whole or in part as to any or all
respondents, on the basis of . . . good
cause . . . .’’ 19 CFR 210.21(a). The ID
notes that Rayenbarny’s declaration
states that it ‘‘has not imported into the
United States, sold for importation into
the United States, or sold in the United
States after importation an electric
shaver.’’ In addition, consistent with
Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1),
Rayenbarny states that ‘‘there are no
agreements, written or oral, express or
implied, between any party or Benepuri
concerning the subject matter of the
Investigation.’’ The ID further notes that
‘‘Rayenbarny’s termination from this
Investigation is in the public interest
and will conserve public and private
resources.’’ ID at 6.
No one petitioned for review of the
subject ID. The Commission has
determined not to review the subject ID.
Benepuri is hereby named a respondent
in this investigation and Rayenbarny is
hereby terminated from this
investigation.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on December
15, 2020.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–28038 Filed 12–17–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1166]
Certain Foodservice Equipment and
Components Thereof; Commission
Determination To Review an Initial
Determination Granting Summary
Determination of No Substantial Injury
to a Domestic Industry, and on Review
To Reverse the Initial Determination
and Remand the Investigation to the
Administrative Law Judge
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\18DEN1.SGM
Notice.
18DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 244 (Friday, December 18, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 82514-82515]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-28038]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1230]
Certain Electric Shavers and Components and Accessories Thereof;
Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial
Determination Granting a Motion for Benepuri LLC To Intervene and To
Terminate Respondent Rayenbarny Inc. for Good Cause
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 82515]]
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission (``Commission'') has determined not to review an initial
determination (``ID'') (Order No. 4) of the presiding administrative
law judge (``ALJ''), granting a motion by Benepuri LLC of Menands, New
York (``Benepuri'') to intervene in the above-referenced investigation
and to terminate the investigation as to respondent Rayenbarny Inc. of
New York, New York (``Rayenbarny'').
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Panyin A. Hughes, Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-3179. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone (202) 205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On November 18, 2020, the Commission
instituted this investigation based on a complaint filed by Skull
Shaver, LLC of Moorestown, New Jersey (``Skull Shaver''). 85 FR 73510-
11 (Nov. 18, 2020). The complaint alleged violations of section 337
based on the importation into the United States, the sale for
importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of
certain electric shavers and components and accessories thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,726,528
and D672,504. Id. The Commission's notice of investigation named the
following eleven entities as respondents: Rayenbarny; Bald Shaver Inc.
of Toronto, Canada; Suzhou Kaidiya Garments Trading Co., Ltd. d.b.a.
``Digimator'' of Suzhou, China; Shenzhen Aiweilai Trading Co., Ltd.
d.b.a. ``Teamyo'' of Shenzhen, China; Wenzhou Wending Electric
Appliance Co., Ltd. of Yueqing City, China; Shenzhen Nukun Technology
Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ``OriHea'' of Shenzhen, China; Yiwu Xingye Network
Technology Co. Ltd. d.b.a. ``Roziapro'' of Yiwu, China; Magicfly LLC of
Hong Kong; Yiwu City Qiaoyu Trading Co., Ltd. of Yiwu, China; Shenzhen
Wantong Information Technology Co., Ltd. d.b.a. ``WTONG'' of Shenzhen,
China; and Shenzhen Junmao International Technology Co., Ltd. d.b.a.
``Homeas'' of Shenzhen, China. The notice of investigation also named
the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (``OUII'') as a party. Id.
On November 18, 2020, Benepuri filed a motion to intervene in this
investigation, asserting that it has an interest in the investigation
because one of its products has been accused and that no other named
respondent has an interest in defending Benepuri's product. Benepuri
also moved for termination of Rayenbarny as a respondent, stating that
the accused product attributed to Rayenbarny, the AsaVea electric
shaver, is actually Benepuri's product. Attached to Benepuri's motion
is a declaration from the President of Rayenbarny, stating that
``Rayenbarny Inc. has not imported into the United States, sold for
importation into the United States, or sold in the United States after
importation an electric shaver'' and that ``[t]o the best of my
knowledge, the AsaVea electric shaver that is identified in the
Complaint in the above referenced Investigation is a product from
Benepuri LLC.'' Benepuri Motion, Exhibit B. On November 23, 2020, Skull
Shaver and OUII filed responses in support of Benepuri's intervention
and Rayenbarny's termination.
On November 30, 2020, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the
motion. Regarding Benepuri's intervention, the ID finds that the motion
complies with the requirements of Commission Rule 210.19. 19 CFR
210.19. Specifically, the ID finds that (1) ``Benepuri's motion to
intervene was timely filed because it was made on the same day as the
November 18, 2020 institution of this Investigation''; (2) ``Benepuri
has demonstrated a substantial interest in the Investigation,''
particularly in connection with the accused AsaVea electric shaver; and
(3) ``Benepuri's interests are not represented by existing parties.''
ID at 5. Thus, the ID finds that ``Benepuri's intervention in this
Investigation is appropriate, and Benepuri should be accorded status as
a respondent.'' Id. at 5-6 (citing Network Interface Cards, Inv. No.
337-TA-455, Comm'n Op. at 10 (July 17, 2001) (a party seeking to
intervene should be accorded respondent status when it could itself be
a respondent in the investigation, but has been omitted by the
complainant for some reason)).
The ID also finds that good cause exists to terminate the
investigation as to Rayenbarny under Commission Rule 210.21(a), which
provides that ``[a]ny party may move at any time prior to the issuance
of an initial determination on violation of section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930 to terminate an investigation in whole or in part as to any
or all respondents, on the basis of . . . good cause . . . .'' 19 CFR
210.21(a). The ID notes that Rayenbarny's declaration states that it
``has not imported into the United States, sold for importation into
the United States, or sold in the United States after importation an
electric shaver.'' In addition, consistent with Commission Rule
210.21(a)(1), Rayenbarny states that ``there are no agreements, written
or oral, express or implied, between any party or Benepuri concerning
the subject matter of the Investigation.'' The ID further notes that
``Rayenbarny's termination from this Investigation is in the public
interest and will conserve public and private resources.'' ID at 6.
No one petitioned for review of the subject ID. The Commission has
determined not to review the subject ID. Benepuri is hereby named a
respondent in this investigation and Rayenbarny is hereby terminated
from this investigation.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on December
15, 2020.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in Part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 15, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-28038 Filed 12-17-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
