Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the Republic of Turkey: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final Negative Critical Circumstances Determination, 80005-80007 [2020-27310]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices
7326.90.8688, or 8413.91.9055. While these
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes From the Preliminary
Determination
IV. Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1: Application of Adverse Facts
Available
Comment 2: Direct Material Costs
Comment 3: Constructed Value Profit
Comment 4: Major Input Adjustment and
the Appropriate Level of Aggregation
V. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–27332 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation is January
1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–489–843]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand From the Republic of Turkey:
Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty
Determination and Final Negative
Critical Circumstances Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
prestressed concrete steel wire strand
(PC strand) from the Republic of Turkey
(Turkey).
DATES: Applicable December 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Whitley Herndon or Jacob Garten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement
and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–6274, or (202) 482–3342,
respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
The petitioners in this investigation
are Insteel Wire Products, Sumiden
Wire Products Corporation, and Wire
Mesh Corporation. In addition to the
Government of Turkey, the mandatory
respondents in this investigation are
Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S. (Celik Halat)
and Guney Celik Hasir ve Demir (Guney
Celik).
A summary of the events that
occurred since Commerce published the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:25 Dec 10, 2020
Jkt 253001
Preliminary Determination,1 as well as a
full discussion of the issues raised by
parties for this final determination, are
discussed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, which is hereby adopted
by this notice.2 The Issues and Decision
Memorandum is a public document and
on file electronically via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and electronic versions
of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation is PC
strand from Turkey. For a complete
description of the scope of this
investigation, see Appendix I.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and
Comments Received
The subsidy programs under
investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in
this investigation are discussed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum. A
list of the issues that parties raised, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is included
as Appendix II.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found
countervailable, Commerce determines
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient
and that the subsidy is specific.3 For a
full description of the methodology
1 See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire from the
Republic of Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination, Preliminary
Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination,
in Part, 85 FR 59287 (September 21, 2020)
(Preliminary Determination), and accompanying
Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Final Determination of the Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the Republic of Turkey,’’ dated
concurrently with this determination (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
3 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80005
underlying our final determination, see
the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
Verification
Commerce was unable to conduct onsite verification of the information
relied upon in making its final
determination in this investigation,
pursuant to section 782(i) of the Act.
Accordingly, we took additional steps in
lieu of on-site verification and requested
additional documentation and
information.4 Consistent with section
776(a)(2)(D) of the Act, Commerce relied
on the information submitted on the
record as facts available in making our
final determination.
Changes Since the Preliminary
Determination
Based on our review and analysis of
the information received in lieu of onsite verification and comments received
from parties, we made certain changes
to the respondents’ subsidy rate
calculations since the Preliminary
Determination and the Post-Preliminary
Analysis Memorandum.5 As a result of
these changes, Commerce has also
revised the all-others rate. For a
discussion of these changes, see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum and
the Final Analysis Memoranda.6
Final Negative Determination of
Critical Circumstances
Pursuant to section 705(a)(2) of the
Act, Commerce determines that critical
circumstances do not exist for imports
of PC strand from Turkey. For full
description of the methodology and
results of Commerce’s critical
circumstances analysis, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section
705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
calculated countervailable subsidy rates
for Celik Halat and Guney Celik. Section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that, for
4 See Commerce’s Letter, dated October 26, 2020;
and Guney Celik’s Letter, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete
Steel Wire Strand from Turkey; In Lieu of
Verification Questionnaire Response,’’ dated
November 3, 2020.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the Republic of Turkey: PostPreliminary Analysis,’’ dated November 19, 2020
(Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum).
6 See Memoranda, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the Republic of Turkey: Final
Determination Calculation Memorandum for Celik
Halat ve Tel San A.S.’’ and ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire
Strand from the Republic of Turkey: Final
Determination Calculation Memorandum for Guney
Celik Hasir ve Demir,’’ both dated concurrently
with this notice (collectively, Final Analysis
Memoranda).
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
80006
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
all exporters and producers not
individually investigated, we will
determine an all-others rate equal to the
weighted-average countervailable
subsidy rates established for exporters
and producers individually
investigated, excluding any zero and de
minimis countervailable subsidy rates,
and any rates determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act.
Notwithstanding the language of
section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we
have not calculated the all-others rate by
weight averaging the rates of Celik Halat
and Guney Celik because doing so risks
disclosure of business proprietary
information. Rather, we used a simple
average to calculate the all-others rate.7
notice to parties in this proceeding in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary
Determination and pursuant to section
703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act,
Commerce instructed U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) to suspend
liquidation of entries of subject
merchandise as described in the scope
of the investigation section, that was
entered or withdrawn from warehouse
for consumption on or after the date of
publication of the Preliminary
Determination in the Federal Register.
Because we find critical
circumstances do not exist for Celik
Final Determination
Halat, we will direct CBP to terminate
the retroactive suspension of liquidation
Commerce determines the total
ordered at the Preliminary
estimated net countervailable subsidy
Determination and release any cash
rates to be:
deposits that were required prior to
September 21, 2020, the date of
Subsidy
rate
Company
publication of the Preliminary
(percent)
Determination in the Federal Register,
Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S.8
158.44 consistent with section 705(c)(3) of the
Guney Celik Hasir ve Demir
30.78 Act.
All Others ..............................
94.61
If the U.S. International Trade
Commission (ITC) issues a final
In accordance with section
affirmative injury determination, we
705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we calculated
will issue a countervailing duty order
a rate for each company respondent.
and require a cash deposit of estimated
Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states
countervailing duties for such entries of
that, for companies not individually
subject merchandise in the amounts
investigated, we will determine an ‘‘all
indicated above. If the ITC determines
others’’ rate equal to the weightedthat material injury, or threat of material
average countervailable subsidy rates
injury, does not exist, this proceeding
established for exporters and producers
will be terminated and all estimated
individually investigated, excluding any duties deposited or securities posted as
zero and de minimis countervailable
a result of the suspension of liquidation
subsidy rates, and any rates determined will be refunded or canceled.
entirely under section 776 of the Act.
Notwithstanding the language of section ITC Notification
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we have not
In accordance with section 705(d) of
calculated the ‘‘all others’’ rate by
the Act, we will notify the ITC of our
weight averaging the rates of Celik Halat determination. In addition, we are
and Guney Celik because doing so risks
making available to the ITC all nondisclosure of proprietary information.
privileged and non-proprietary
Therefore, we calculated a simple
information related to this investigation.
average of Celik Halat and Guney Celik’s We will allow the ITC access to all
rates.
privileged and business proprietary
information in our files, provided the
Disclosure
ITC confirms that it will not disclose
Commerce will disclose the
such information, either publicly or
calculations performed in connection
under an administrative protective order
with this final determination within five (APO), without the written consent of
days of the date of publication of this
the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement
and Compliance.
7 We have calculated the simple average of the
Because the final determination in
two responding firm’s rates for the all-others rate
this
proceeding is affirmative, in
using the following
calculation: (158.44 (Celik Halat’s calculated rate) accordance with section 705(b) of the
Act, the ITC will make its final
+ 30.78 (Guney Celik’s calculated rate))/2 = 94.61
(the all-others rate).
determination as to whether the
8 Commerce found the following companies to be
domestic industry in the United States
cross-owned with Celik Halat: Dogan Sirketler
is materially injured, or threatened with
Grubu Holding A.S. and Adilbey Holding A.S. See
material injury, by reason of imports of
Preliminary Determination PDM at ‘‘Attribution of
Subsidies.’’
welded pipe from Turkey no later than
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:25 Dec 10, 2020
Jkt 253001
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45 days after our final determination. If
the ITC determines that material injury
or threat of material injury does not
exist, this proceeding will be terminated
and all cash deposits will be refunded.
If the ITC determines that such injury
does exist, Commerce will issue a
countervailing duty order directing CBP
to assess, upon further instruction by
Commerce, countervailing duties on all
imports of the subject merchandise that
are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation, as discussed above in the
‘‘Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation’’ section.
Notification Regarding APO
In the event that the ITC issues a final
negative injury determination, this
notice will serve as the only reminder
to parties subject to the APO of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a violation which is subject to
sanction.
This determination is issued and
published pursuant to sections 705(d)
and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 7, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this
investigation is prestressed concrete steel
wire strand (PC strand), produced from wire
of non-stainless, non-galvanized steel, which
is suitable for use in prestressed concrete
(both pretensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition
encompasses covered and uncovered strand
and all types, grades, and diameters of PC
strand. PC strand is normally sold in the
United States in sizes ranging from 0.25
inches to 0.70 inches in diameter. PC strand
made from galvanized wire is only excluded
from the scope if the zinc and/or zinc oxide
coating meets or exceeds the 0.40 oz./ft2
standard set forth in ASTM–A–475.
The PC strand subject to this investigation
is currently classifiable under subheadings
7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United
States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for convenience
and customs purposes, the written
description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Determination of Critical
Circumstances
IV. Use of Adverse Facts Available
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse
Facts Available (AFA) to Guney Celik
Hasir ve Demir (Guney Celik)
Comment 2: Application of AFA to Certain
Guney Celik Programs
Comment 3: Correct Numerator for the Tax
Reduction RIIS Regional Investment
Incentive Scheme (RIIS) Program
Comment 4: Allocation or Expense of
Certain Grant Program Benefits for
Guney Celik
Comment 5: Application of AFA to the
Property Tax Exemption Program for
Guney Celik
Comment 6: Application of AFA to Celik
Halat ve Tel San A.S. (Celik Halat)
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–27310 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–821–827]
Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel
Standard, Line, and Pressure Pipe
From the Russian Federation:
Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Alignment of
Final Determination With Final
Antidumping Duty Determination
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that countervailable subsidies are being
provided to producers and exporters of
seamless carbon and alloy steel
standard, line, and pressure pipe
(seamless pipe) from the Russian
Federation (Russia). The period of
investigation is January 1, 2019 through
December 31, 2019. Interested parties
are invited to comment on this
preliminary determination.
DATES: Applicable December 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caitlin Monks, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2670, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:25 Dec 10, 2020
Jkt 253001
Background
This preliminary determination is
made in accordance with section 703(b)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act). Commerce published the
notice of initiation of this investigation
on August 4, 2020.1 On September 2,
2020, Commerce postponed the
preliminary determination of this
investigation to December 7, 2020.2 For
a complete description of the events that
followed the initiation of this
investigation, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum.3 A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is included as Appendix
II to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Scope of the Investigation
The products covered by this
investigation are seamless pipe from
Russia. For a complete description of
the scope of this investigation, see
Appendix I.
Scope Comments
In accordance with the Preamble to
Commerce’s regulations,4 we set aside a
period of time, as stated in the Initiation
Notice, for parties to raise issues
regarding product coverage (i.e., scope).5
We received comments concerning the
scope of the antidumping duty (AD) and
countervailing duty (CVD)
investigations of seamless pipe as it
1 See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard,
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea
and the Russian Federation: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigations, 85 FR 47170
(August 4, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
2 See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard,
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea
and the Russian Federation: Postponement of
Preliminary Determinations in the Countervailing
Duty Investigations, 85 FR 54533 (September 2,
2020).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Affirmative Preliminary Determination in the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Seamless
Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line, and
Pressure Pipe from the Russian Federation,’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
4 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997)
(Preamble).
5 See Initiation Notice, 85 FR at 47171.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
80007
appeared in the Initiation Notice. We
are currently evaluating the scope
comments filed by the interested
parties. We intend to issue our
preliminary decision regarding the
scope of this and the companion AD
and CVD investigations no later than
February 3, 2021, the deadline for the
preliminary determinations in the
companion AD investigations with
respect to Russia, the Republic of Korea,
and Ukraine.6 We will issue a final
scope decision after considering any
relevant comments submitted in case
and rebuttal briefs.7
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Act. For each of the subsidy
programs found countervailable,
Commerce preliminarily determines
that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial
contribution by an ‘‘authority’’ that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.8
Commerce notes that, in making these
findings, it relied, in part, on facts
available and, because it finds that the
respondent did not act to the best of its
ability to respond to Commerce’s
requests for information, Commerce
drew an adverse inference where
appropriate in selecting from among the
facts otherwise available.9 For further
information, see ‘‘Use of Facts
Otherwise Available and Adverse
Inferences’’ in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
Alignment
As noted in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum, in accordance with
section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.210(b)(4), Commerce is aligning the
final CVD determination in this
investigation with the final
determination in the companion AD
investigation of seamless pipe from
Russia based on a request made by the
petitioner.10 Consequently, the final
6 See Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard,
Line, and Pressure Pipe from the Republic of Korea,
the Russian Federation, and Ukraine:
Postponement of Preliminary Determinations in the
Less-Than-Fair Value Investigations, 85 FR 73687
(November 19, 2020).
7 The deadlines for interested parties to submit
scope case and rebuttal briefs will be established in
the preliminary
scope decision memorandum.
8 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of
the Act regarding specificity.
9 See sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act.
10 See Vallourec Star, LP (Petitioner)’s Letter,
‘‘Seamless Carbon and Alloy Steel Standard, Line,
and Pressure Pipe from Korea and Russia: Request
to Align Final Determinations,’’ dated October 15,
2020.
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80005-80007]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27310]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-489-843]
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the Republic of
Turkey: Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and Final
Negative Critical Circumstances Determination
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that
countervailable subsidies are being provided to producers and exporters
of prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from the Republic
of Turkey (Turkey).
DATES: Applicable December 11, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Whitley Herndon or Jacob Garten, AD/
CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-6274, or (202)
482-3342, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The petitioners in this investigation are Insteel Wire Products,
Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corporation. In
addition to the Government of Turkey, the mandatory respondents in this
investigation are Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S. (Celik Halat) and Guney
Celik Hasir ve Demir (Guney Celik).
A summary of the events that occurred since Commerce published the
Preliminary Determination,\1\ as well as a full discussion of the
issues raised by parties for this final determination, are discussed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum, which is hereby adopted by this
notice.\2\ The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and
on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In
addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can
be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed
and electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are
identical in content.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire from the Republic of
Turkey: Preliminary Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination,
Preliminary Affirmative Critical Circumstances Determination, in
Part, 85 FR 59287 (September 21, 2020) (Preliminary Determination),
and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM).
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Decision Memorandum for the Final
Determination of the Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of
Turkey,'' dated concurrently with this determination (Issues and
Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
The period of investigation is January 1, 2019 through December 31,
2019.
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of the investigation is PC strand from Turkey. For a
complete description of the scope of this investigation, see Appendix
I.
Analysis of Subsidy Programs and Comments Received
The subsidy programs under investigation and the issues raised in
the case and rebuttal briefs by parties in this investigation are
discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues
that parties raised, and to which we responded in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, is included as Appendix II.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this investigation in accordance with section
701 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the
subsidy programs found countervailable, Commerce determines that there
is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution by an ``authority'' that
gives rise to a benefit to the recipient and that the subsidy is
specific.\3\ For a full description of the methodology underlying our
final determination, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Verification
Commerce was unable to conduct on-site verification of the
information relied upon in making its final determination in this
investigation, pursuant to section 782(i) of the Act. Accordingly, we
took additional steps in lieu of on-site verification and requested
additional documentation and information.\4\ Consistent with section
776(a)(2)(D) of the Act, Commerce relied on the information submitted
on the record as facts available in making our final determination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Commerce's Letter, dated October 26, 2020; and Guney
Celik's Letter, ``Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from
Turkey; In Lieu of Verification Questionnaire Response,'' dated
November 3, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Determination
Based on our review and analysis of the information received in
lieu of on-site verification and comments received from parties, we
made certain changes to the respondents' subsidy rate calculations
since the Preliminary Determination and the Post-Preliminary Analysis
Memorandum.\5\ As a result of these changes, Commerce has also revised
the all-others rate. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum and the Final Analysis Memoranda.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Memorandum, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Turkey:
Post-Preliminary Analysis,'' dated November 19, 2020 (Post-
Preliminary Analysis Memorandum).
\6\ See Memoranda, ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Turkey:
Final Determination Calculation Memorandum for Celik Halat ve Tel
San A.S.'' and ``Countervailing Duty Investigation of Prestressed
Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Turkey: Final
Determination Calculation Memorandum for Guney Celik Hasir ve
Demir,'' both dated concurrently with this notice (collectively,
Final Analysis Memoranda).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Negative Determination of Critical Circumstances
Pursuant to section 705(a)(2) of the Act, Commerce determines that
critical circumstances do not exist for imports of PC strand from
Turkey. For full description of the methodology and results of
Commerce's critical circumstances analysis, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
All-Others Rate
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i)(I) of the Act, we
calculated countervailable subsidy rates for Celik Halat and Guney
Celik. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act states that, for
[[Page 80006]]
all exporters and producers not individually investigated, we will
determine an all-others rate equal to the weighted-average
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act.
Notwithstanding the language of section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act,
we have not calculated the all-others rate by weight averaging the
rates of Celik Halat and Guney Celik because doing so risks disclosure
of business proprietary information. Rather, we used a simple average
to calculate the all-others rate.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ We have calculated the simple average of the two responding
firm's rates for the all-others rate using the following
calculation: (158.44 (Celik Halat's calculated rate) + 30.78
(Guney Celik's calculated rate))/2 = 94.61 (the all-others rate).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Final Determination
Commerce determines the total estimated net countervailable subsidy
rates to be:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Commerce found the following companies to be cross-owned
with Celik Halat: Dogan Sirketler Grubu Holding A.S. and Adilbey
Holding A.S. See Preliminary Determination PDM at ``Attribution of
Subsidies.''
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S.\8\.......................... 158.44
Guney Celik Hasir ve Demir.............................. 30.78
All Others.............................................. 94.61
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 705(c)(1)(B)(i) of the Act, we
calculated a rate for each company respondent. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i)
of the Act states that, for companies not individually investigated, we
will determine an ``all others'' rate equal to the weighted-average
countervailable subsidy rates established for exporters and producers
individually investigated, excluding any zero and de minimis
countervailable subsidy rates, and any rates determined entirely under
section 776 of the Act. Notwithstanding the language of section
705(c)(5)(A)(i) of the Act, we have not calculated the ``all others''
rate by weight averaging the rates of Celik Halat and Guney Celik
because doing so risks disclosure of proprietary information.
Therefore, we calculated a simple average of Celik Halat and Guney
Celik's rates.
Disclosure
Commerce will disclose the calculations performed in connection
with this final determination within five days of the date of
publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.224(b).
Continuation of Suspension of Liquidation
As a result of our Preliminary Determination and pursuant to
section 703(d)(1)(B) and (d)(2) of the Act, Commerce instructed U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to suspend liquidation of entries
of subject merchandise as described in the scope of the investigation
section, that was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption
on or after the date of publication of the Preliminary Determination in
the Federal Register.
Because we find critical circumstances do not exist for Celik
Halat, we will direct CBP to terminate the retroactive suspension of
liquidation ordered at the Preliminary Determination and release any
cash deposits that were required prior to September 21, 2020, the date
of publication of the Preliminary Determination in the Federal
Register, consistent with section 705(c)(3) of the Act.
If the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) issues a final
affirmative injury determination, we will issue a countervailing duty
order and require a cash deposit of estimated countervailing duties for
such entries of subject merchandise in the amounts indicated above. If
the ITC determines that material injury, or threat of material injury,
does not exist, this proceeding will be terminated and all estimated
duties deposited or securities posted as a result of the suspension of
liquidation will be refunded or canceled.
ITC Notification
In accordance with section 705(d) of the Act, we will notify the
ITC of our determination. In addition, we are making available to the
ITC all non-privileged and non-proprietary information related to this
investigation. We will allow the ITC access to all privileged and
business proprietary information in our files, provided the ITC
confirms that it will not disclose such information, either publicly or
under an administrative protective order (APO), without the written
consent of the Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Because the final determination in this proceeding is affirmative,
in accordance with section 705(b) of the Act, the ITC will make its
final determination as to whether the domestic industry in the United
States is materially injured, or threatened with material injury, by
reason of imports of welded pipe from Turkey no later than 45 days
after our final determination. If the ITC determines that material
injury or threat of material injury does not exist, this proceeding
will be terminated and all cash deposits will be refunded. If the ITC
determines that such injury does exist, Commerce will issue a
countervailing duty order directing CBP to assess, upon further
instruction by Commerce, countervailing duties on all imports of the
subject merchandise that are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the effective date of the suspension of
liquidation, as discussed above in the ``Continuation of Suspension of
Liquidation'' section.
Notification Regarding APO
In the event that the ITC issues a final negative injury
determination, this notice will serve as the only reminder to parties
subject to the APO of their responsibility concerning the destruction
of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19
CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms
of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
This determination is issued and published pursuant to sections
705(d) and 777(i) of the Act.
Dated: December 7, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix I
Scope of the Investigation
The merchandise covered by this investigation is prestressed
concrete steel wire strand (PC strand), produced from wire of non-
stainless, non-galvanized steel, which is suitable for use in
prestressed concrete (both pretensioned and post-tensioned)
applications. The product definition encompasses covered and
uncovered strand and all types, grades, and diameters of PC strand.
PC strand is normally sold in the United States in sizes ranging
from 0.25 inches to 0.70 inches in diameter. PC strand made from
galvanized wire is only excluded from the scope if the zinc and/or
zinc oxide coating meets or exceeds the 0.40 oz./ft2 standard set
forth in ASTM-A-475.
The PC strand subject to this investigation is currently
classifiable under subheadings 7312.10.3010 and 7312.10.3012 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description of the scope of this investigation
is dispositive.
[[Page 80007]]
Appendix II
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Final Determination of Critical Circumstances
IV. Use of Adverse Facts Available
V. Subsidies Valuation Information
VI. Analysis of Programs
VII. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Application of Total Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to
Guney Celik Hasir ve Demir (Guney Celik)
Comment 2: Application of AFA to Certain Guney Celik Programs
Comment 3: Correct Numerator for the Tax Reduction RIIS Regional
Investment Incentive Scheme (RIIS) Program
Comment 4: Allocation or Expense of Certain Grant Program
Benefits for Guney Celik
Comment 5: Application of AFA to the Property Tax Exemption
Program for Guney Celik
Comment 6: Application of AFA to Celik Halat ve Tel San A.S.
(Celik Halat)
VIII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020-27310 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P