Certain Road Construction Machines and Components Thereof; Commission Decision to Institute a Rescission Proceeding; Permanent Rescission of a Seizure and Forfeiture Order; Termination of the Rescission Proceeding, 80150-80151 [2020-27195]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
80150
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices
industry advice and details on steps it
has taken that have resulted in
significant improvement to its safety
performance, and leadership positions it
has taken within industry organizations,
such as the American Petroleum
Institute (API), the Offshore Operators
Committee (OOC), or The Center for
Offshore Safety (COS), with a focus on
advancing safety. Similarly, BSEE will
also assess how operators are providing
guidance and supporting environmental
research, mitigation assessments, and
project validation of pollution
prevention, spill preparedness/
response, and environmental
compliance efforts, which not only
benefit their operations and stewardship
culture, but every partner in the OCS
energy program.
Environmental stewardship
components that BSEE will consider
include:
• A sustained compliance record (≤
90-percent) with assigned
environmental mitigation measures and
similar regulatory requirements, as
confirmed by office and field
verification;
• Participation and leadership with
critical Joint Industry Project (JIP) efforts
and within environmental and/or
pollution prevention-focused
workgroups and teams;
• Response preparedness and
planning assessments;
• Non-compulsory enhancements and
innovation above and beyond standard
pollution prevention requirements; and
• Repeated (100-percent) appropriate
and constructive response on corrective/
remedial actions associated with all
noncompliance issues.
For information on the ‘‘Leaders in
Advancing Safety and Environmental
Stewardship’’ Recognition Program or
the submission of comments, the public
should contact Mr. Jason Mathews,
Chief, Safety Improvement Branch,
Regional Field Operations (GE 1073E),
BSEE, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region, 1201
Elmwood Park Boulevard, New Orleans,
Louisiana 70123–2394, (504) 731–1496.
BSEE will implement this program in
2021, with qualifying OCS operators
recognized in 2022 for their 2020 and
2021 calendar year performance. BSEE
will initiate performance reviews
beginning in January 2021 and January
2022, and all OCS operators who meet
the minimum requirements and are
selected by BSEE for recognition, will be
identified by April-May 2022.
Casey Hammond,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Land
and Minerals Management.
[FR Doc. 2020–27237 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–VH–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:25 Dec 10, 2020
Jkt 253001
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1088
(Rescission)]
Certain Road Construction Machines
and Components Thereof;
Commission Decision to Institute a
Rescission Proceeding; Permanent
Rescission of a Seizure and Forfeiture
Order; Termination of the Rescission
Proceeding
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to institute
a proceeding to determine whether to
permanently rescind the Commission’s
seizure and forfeiture order (‘‘SFO’’) of
January 14, 2020 (corrected January 23,
2020) issued against Wirtgen America,
Inc. (‘‘Wirtgen America’’). The SFO is
permanently rescinded. The rescission
proceeding is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–4716. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on November 29, 2017, based on a
complaint, as supplemented, filed by
Caterpillar Inc. of Peoria, Illinois and
Caterpillar Paving Products, Inc. of
Minneapolis, Minnesota (collectively,
‘‘Caterpillar’’). See 82FR 56625–26 (Nov.
29, 2017). The complaint, as
supplemented, alleges violations of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337) (‘‘section
337’’), based upon the importation into
the United States, the sale for
importation, and the sale within the
United States after importation of
certain road construction machines and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00161
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,140,693 (‘‘the ’693
patent’’); 9,045,871; and 7,641,419. See
id. The notice of investigation identifies
the following respondents: Wirtgen
GmbH of Windhagen, Germany; Joseph
Vo¨gele AG of Ludwigshafen, Germany;
Wirtgen Group Holding GmbH of
Windhagen, Germany; and Wirtgen
America of Antioch, Tennessee
(collectively, ‘‘Wirtgen’’). See id. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
not a party to this investigation. See id.
On June 27, 2019, the Commission
found a violation of section 337 in the
above-identified investigation based on
the infringement of claim 19 of the ’693
patent and issued a limited exclusion
order against the infringing articles and
a cease and desist order (collectively,
‘‘the remedial orders’’) against Wirtgen
America. The United States Customs
and Border Protection (‘‘Customs’’)
subsequently excluded six Wirtgen
redesigned series 1810 machines in
December 2019. Based on such
exclusion, the Commission issued the
subject SFO on January 14, 2020
(corrected January 23, 2020). On March
13, 2020, Wirtgen filed an appeal from
the SFO (‘‘the SFO appeal’’) to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
(‘‘Federal Circuit’’).
On January 30, 2020, Wirtgen filed a
civil action against Customs and related
U.S. government parties (collectively,
‘‘the U.S. government’’) in the U.S.
Court of International Trade (‘‘CIT’’)
under 28 U.S.C. 1581(a) and (i). The
Commission moved to intervene to
contest the CIT’s exercise of
jurisdiction, and the CIT denied the
Commission’s motion. The CIT
exercised jurisdiction under section
1581(a) over the U.S. government’s
objections and granted summary
judgment for Wirtgen as to the excluded
entries of the redesigned machines at
issue. The CIT also ordered Customs to
release the machines for entry into the
United States no later than Thursday,
May 21, 2020. On July 14, 2020, the U.S.
government appealed the CIT’s decision
to the Federal Circuit (‘‘the CIT
appeal’’).
On May 21, 2020, arguing that the
predicate for the SFO had been
invalidated by the CIT, Wirtgen filed an
emergency motion to stay or temporarily
rescind the SFO pending resolution of
any CIT appeal. On June 10, 2020, the
Commission determined to deny
Wirtgen’s motion to stay, but granted
Wirtgen’s motion for temporary
rescission of the SFO, thus temporarily
suspending the SFO until such time as
the CIT’s decision is modified, stayed,
or overturned. On June 15, 2020, the
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 239 / Friday, December 11, 2020 / Notices
Commission filed a motion to stay the
SFO appeal pending reinstatement of
the SFO by the Commission or
resolution of any CIT appeal by the
Federal Circuit. On July 29, 2020, the
Federal Circuit granted the
Commission’s motion to stay the SFO
appeal until the suspension of the SFO
is lifted or until final disposition of the
CIT appeal.
Concurrently, on January 16, 2020,
the Commission instituted a
modification proceeding to determine
whether Wirtgen’s redesigned series
1810 machines infringe claim 19 of the
’693 patent. On August 31, 2020, the
Commission determined that Wirtgen’s
redesigned machines do not infringe
and issued modified remedial orders
exempting the redesigned machines
from the scope of the orders. Caterpillar
did not appeal the Commission’s noninfringement determination to the
Federal Circuit, and therefore, the
Commission’s non-infringement
determination is now final.
Consequently, on November 5, 2020, the
U.S. government moved to dismiss the
CIT appeal. On December 4, 2020, the
Federal Circuit dismissed the CIT
appeal.
In view of the Federal Circuit’s
dismissal of the CIT appeal, the
Commission has determined to institute
a rescission proceeding and to
permanently rescind the SFO. The
rescission proceeding is hereby
terminated.
The Commission’s vote for this
determination took place on December
7, 2020.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 7, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
23:25 Dec 10, 2020
Jkt 253001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
On November 12, 2019, the Assistant
Administrator, Diversion Control
Division, Drug Enforcement
Administration (hereinafter,
Government), issued an Order to Show
Cause (hereinafter, OSC) to King Wong,
M.D. (hereinafter, Registrant). OSC, at 1.
The OSC proposed the revocation of
Registrant’s Certificate of Registration
No. AL1804409. Id. It alleged that
Registrant is without ‘‘authority to
handle controlled substances in
California, the state in which [Registrant
is] registered with the DEA.’’ Id. (citing
21 U.S.C. 823(f) and 824(a)(3)).
Specifically, the OSC alleged that
Registrant surrendered his medical
license pursuant to an agreement with
the Medical Board of California on
March 18, 2019, and that his license
remains surrendered. Id. at 1–2. The
OSC further alleged that because
Registrant surrendered his medical
license, Registrant lacks the authority to
handle controlled substances in the
State of California. Id. at 2.
The OSC notified Registrant of the
right to either request a hearing on the
allegations or submit a written
statement in lieu of exercising the right
to a hearing, the procedures for electing
each option, and the consequences for
failing to elect either option. Id. (citing
21 CFR 1301.43). The OSC also notified
Registrant of the opportunity to submit
a corrective action plan. Id. at 3 (citing
21 U.S.C. 824(c)(2)(C)).
A DEA Diversion Investigator
personally served Registrant with the
OSC on December 13, 2019, and
Registrant signed a DEA Form 12,
Receipt for Cash or Other Items, to
acknowledge his receipt of the OSC.
Request for Final Agency Action Exhibit
(hereinafter, RFAAX) 8, at 2–3
(Declaration of Diversion Investigator);
RFAAX 5 (DEA Form 12 signed by
Registrant). I find that more than thirty
days have now passed since the
Government accomplished service of
the OSC. Further, based on the
Government’s written representations, I
find that neither Registrant, nor anyone
purporting to represent Registrant,
requested a hearing, submitted a written
statement while waiving Registrant’s
right to a hearing, or submitted a
corrective action plan. RFAAX 8, at 3;
RFAAX 6 (Emails regarding no
communication from Registrant).
Accordingly, I find that Registrant has
waived the right to a hearing and the
right to submit a written statement and
Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary,
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure of the Judicial Conference of
the United States, Thurgood Marshall
Federal Judiciary Building, One
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300,
Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202)
502–1820, RulesCommittee_Secretary@
ao.uscourts.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Announcements for this hearing were
previously published in 85 FR 48562.
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.
Dated: December 8, 2020.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2020–27279 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF THE
UNITED STATES
Advisory Committee on Appellate
Rules; Hearing of the Judicial
Conference
Advisory Committee on the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,
Judicial Conference of the United States.
AGENCY:
Notice of Cancellation of Open
Hearing.
ACTION:
The following remote public
hearing on proposed amendments to the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure
has been canceled: Appellate Rules
Hearing on January 4, 2021.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Authority: 28 U.S.C. 2073.
Advisory Committee on the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure,
Judicial Conference of the United States.
ACTION: Notice of Cancellation of Open
Hearing.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Announcements for this hearing were
previously published in 85 FR 48562.
Advisory Committee on Bankruptcy
Rules; Hearing of the Judicial
Conference
AGENCY:
The following remote public
hearing on proposed amendments to the
Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure
has been canceled: Bankruptcy Rules
Hearing on January 7, 2021.
SUMMARY:
Rebecca A. Womeldorf, Secretary,
Committee on Rules of Practice and
Procedure of the Judicial Conference of
the United States, Thurgood Marshall
Federal Judiciary Building, One
Columbus Circle NE, Suite 7–300,
Washington, DC 20544, Telephone (202)
502–1820, RulesCommittee_Secretary@
ao.uscourts.gov.
[FR Doc. 2020–27195 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
80151
Dated: December 8, 2020.
Rebecca A. Womeldorf,
Chief Counsel, Rules Committee Staff.
[FR Doc. 2020–27278 Filed 12–10–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 2210–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00162
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Drug Enforcement Administration
King Wong, M.D.; Decision and Order
E:\FR\FM\11DEN1.SGM
11DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 239 (Friday, December 11, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80150-80151]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27195]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1088 (Rescission)]
Certain Road Construction Machines and Components Thereof;
Commission Decision to Institute a Rescission Proceeding; Permanent
Rescission of a Seizure and Forfeiture Order; Termination of the
Rescission Proceeding
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has determined to institute a proceeding to determine
whether to permanently rescind the Commission's seizure and forfeiture
order (``SFO'') of January 14, 2020 (corrected January 23, 2020) issued
against Wirtgen America, Inc. (``Wirtgen America''). The SFO is
permanently rescinded. The rescission proceeding is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Houda Morad, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-4716. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on November 29, 2017, based on a complaint, as supplemented, filed by
Caterpillar Inc. of Peoria, Illinois and Caterpillar Paving Products,
Inc. of Minneapolis, Minnesota (collectively, ``Caterpillar''). See
82FR 56625-26 (Nov. 29, 2017). The complaint, as supplemented, alleges
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19
U.S.C. 1337) (``section 337''), based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United
States after importation of certain road construction machines and
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 7,140,693 (``the '693 patent''); 9,045,871; and 7,641,419.
See id. The notice of investigation identifies the following
respondents: Wirtgen GmbH of Windhagen, Germany; Joseph V[ouml]gele AG
of Ludwigshafen, Germany; Wirtgen Group Holding GmbH of Windhagen,
Germany; and Wirtgen America of Antioch, Tennessee (collectively,
``Wirtgen''). See id. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not
a party to this investigation. See id.
On June 27, 2019, the Commission found a violation of section 337
in the above-identified investigation based on the infringement of
claim 19 of the '693 patent and issued a limited exclusion order
against the infringing articles and a cease and desist order
(collectively, ``the remedial orders'') against Wirtgen America. The
United States Customs and Border Protection (``Customs'') subsequently
excluded six Wirtgen redesigned series 1810 machines in December 2019.
Based on such exclusion, the Commission issued the subject SFO on
January 14, 2020 (corrected January 23, 2020). On March 13, 2020,
Wirtgen filed an appeal from the SFO (``the SFO appeal'') to the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``Federal Circuit'').
On January 30, 2020, Wirtgen filed a civil action against Customs
and related U.S. government parties (collectively, ``the U.S.
government'') in the U.S. Court of International Trade (``CIT'') under
28 U.S.C. 1581(a) and (i). The Commission moved to intervene to contest
the CIT's exercise of jurisdiction, and the CIT denied the Commission's
motion. The CIT exercised jurisdiction under section 1581(a) over the
U.S. government's objections and granted summary judgment for Wirtgen
as to the excluded entries of the redesigned machines at issue. The CIT
also ordered Customs to release the machines for entry into the United
States no later than Thursday, May 21, 2020. On July 14, 2020, the U.S.
government appealed the CIT's decision to the Federal Circuit (``the
CIT appeal'').
On May 21, 2020, arguing that the predicate for the SFO had been
invalidated by the CIT, Wirtgen filed an emergency motion to stay or
temporarily rescind the SFO pending resolution of any CIT appeal. On
June 10, 2020, the Commission determined to deny Wirtgen's motion to
stay, but granted Wirtgen's motion for temporary rescission of the SFO,
thus temporarily suspending the SFO until such time as the CIT's
decision is modified, stayed, or overturned. On June 15, 2020, the
[[Page 80151]]
Commission filed a motion to stay the SFO appeal pending reinstatement
of the SFO by the Commission or resolution of any CIT appeal by the
Federal Circuit. On July 29, 2020, the Federal Circuit granted the
Commission's motion to stay the SFO appeal until the suspension of the
SFO is lifted or until final disposition of the CIT appeal.
Concurrently, on January 16, 2020, the Commission instituted a
modification proceeding to determine whether Wirtgen's redesigned
series 1810 machines infringe claim 19 of the '693 patent. On August
31, 2020, the Commission determined that Wirtgen's redesigned machines
do not infringe and issued modified remedial orders exempting the
redesigned machines from the scope of the orders. Caterpillar did not
appeal the Commission's non-infringement determination to the Federal
Circuit, and therefore, the Commission's non-infringement determination
is now final. Consequently, on November 5, 2020, the U.S. government
moved to dismiss the CIT appeal. On December 4, 2020, the Federal
Circuit dismissed the CIT appeal.
In view of the Federal Circuit's dismissal of the CIT appeal, the
Commission has determined to institute a rescission proceeding and to
permanently rescind the SFO. The rescission proceeding is hereby
terminated.
The Commission's vote for this determination took place on December
7, 2020.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: December 7, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-27195 Filed 12-10-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P