Laminated Woven Sacks From the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018-2019, 78825-78827 [2020-26831]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Notices
entire annual sample and is
representative of the sampling frame.
The Census Bureau proposes to use two
randomly selected methods panel
groups for each treatment. Hence, each
treatment will have a sample size of
approximately 24,000 addresses. In
total, approximately 96,000 addresses
will be used for the four experimental
treatments and 24,000 for the control.
The remaining ACS sample will receive
production materials.
The Census Bureau proposes to
evaluate the experimental treatments by
comparing self-response rates overall
and by mode. For each comparison, a
two-tailed t-test will be used to measure
the impact on the evaluation measure in
either direction with 80 percent power
at the a = 0.1 level. The sample size will
be able to detect differences of
approximately 1.74 percentage points
between the self-response return rates
between two experimental treatments.
To assess the costs of implementing any
of the experimental treatments, we will
also conduct a cost analysis.
The Regional Office internet Letter
Test is designed to test content changes
to a letter used to encourage online selfresponse during CAPI. This letter is sent
as a pressure-seal mailer from the
Census Bureau’s National Processing
Center to all mailable sampled
addresses in the CAPI universe.
The changes to the pressure seal letter
proposed for this test are (1) the message
on the outside of the pressure seal
mailer (options include either a ‘‘Past
Due’’ message or ‘‘Required by Law’’)
and (2) whether to include information
about TQA as a response option, or only
mention the internet. The experimental
design isolates each of the content
factors being studied. There is one
control, which uses production
materials, and three experimental
treatments.
To field this test, the Census Bureau
plans to use the ACS production sample
(clearance number: 0607–0810). There is
no increase in burden from this test
because each treatment will include the
same number of mailings and result in
the same burden estimate per interview
(40 minutes). The Census Bureau
proposes that this test be conducted in
the summer of 2021 (pending
operational constraints) and adhere to
the same data collection protocols as
production ACS.
The Census Bureau proposes to use
six randomly selected methods panel
groups for each treatment. Each
treatment will have a sample size of
approximately 15,600 addresses. In
total, approximately 46,800 addresses
will be used for the three experimental
treatments and 15,600 for the control.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Dec 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
All mailable CAPI cases are included in
the experiment.
The Census Bureau proposes to
evaluate the experimental treatments by
comparing self-response rates during
CAPI and overall CAPI response rates,
as well as refusal rates and other
interview outcomes. The TQA call
volume will also be monitored. For each
comparison, a two-tailed test will be
used so that the Census Bureau can
measure the impact on the evaluation
measure in either direction with 80
percent power at the a = 0.1 level. The
sample size will be able to detect
differences of approximately 1.74
percentage points between the selfresponse return rates between two
experimental treatments. A cost analysis
will also be conducted.
Affected Public: Individuals or
households.
Frequency: One-time tests as part of
the monthly American Community
Survey.
Respondent’s Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13, United
States Code, Sections 141, 193, and 221.
This information collection request
may be viewed at www.reginfo.gov.
Follow the instructions to view the
Department of Commerce collections
currently under review by OMB.
Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function and
entering either the title of the collection
or the OMB Control Number 0607–0936.
ACTION:
78825
Notice; correction.
The International Trade
Administration published a document
in the Federal Register of November 6,
2020, concerning the final results of the
administrative review of circular
welded non-alloy steel pipe (CWP) from
the Republic of Korea (Korea) for the
period of review of November 1, 2017
through October 31, 2018. The
document contained an incorrect
spelling.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Andre Gziryan, AD/CVD Operations,
Office I, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2201.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
Correction
In the Federal Register of November
6, 2020, in FR Doc 2020–24722, on page
71057, in the second column, correct
Appendix II (List of Companies Not
Individually Examined), number 22, to
read ‘‘Ycp Co.’’ 1
This correction to the Final Results is
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Tariff Act
of 1930, as amended.
Dated: November 19, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–26181 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–916]
[FR Doc. 2020–26824 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am]
Laminated Woven Sacks From the
People’s Republic of China: Final
Results of the Administrative Review
of the Antidumping Duty Order; 2018–
2019
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
AGENCY:
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–580–809]
Circular Welded Non-Alloy Steel Pipe
From the Republic of Korea: Final
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2017–2018;
Correction
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Enforcement and Compliance
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that the 20 companies
subject to the administrative review of
the antidumping duty (AD) order on
laminated woven sacks (LWS) from the
1 Id. This respondent’s name was similarly
misspelled in the initiation notice and preliminary
results. See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
2159 (February 6, 2019); see also Circular Welded
Non-Alloy Steel Pipe from the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review; 2017–2018, 85 FR 2719
(January 16, 2020).
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
78826
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Notices
People’s Republic of China (China) are
part of the China-wide entity because
none of the companies filed a separate
rate application (SRA) or separate rate
certification (SRC). The period of review
(POR) is August 1, 2018 through July 31,
2019.
DATES:
Applicable December 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nicolas Mayora, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3053.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2020, Commerce
published the Preliminary Results of the
administrative review of the AD order
on LWS from China, wherein we
preliminary determined that the 20
companies subject to the review are part
of the China-wide entity because none
of the companies filed an SRA or SRC.1
We invited parties to submit comments
on the Preliminary Results. No party
submitted comments. Accordingly, the
final results remain unchanged from the
Preliminary Results.
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled
all deadlines in administrative reviews
by 50 days.2 On July 21, 2020,
Commerce tolled all deadlines in
administrative reviews by an additional
60 days.3 The deadline for the final
results of this review is now December
3, 2020.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is laminated woven sacks. Laminated
woven sacks are bags or sacks consisting
of one or more plies of fabric consisting
of woven polypropylene strip and/or
woven polyethylene strip, regardless of
the width of the strip; with or without
an extrusion coating of polypropylene
and/or polyethylene on one or both
sides of the fabric; laminated by any
method either to an exterior ply of
plastic film such as biaxially-oriented
polypropylene (BOPP) or to an exterior
ply of paper that is suitable for high
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
1 See
Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s
Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2018–
2019, 85 FR 21388 (April 17, 2020) (Preliminary
Results).
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Dec 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
quality print graphics; 4 printed with
three colors or more in register; with or
without lining; whether or not closed on
one end; whether or not in roll form
(including sheets, lay-flat tubing, and
sleeves); with or without handles; with
or without special closing features; not
exceeding one kilogram in weight.
Laminated woven sacks are typically
used for retail packaging of consumer
goods such as pet foods and bird seed.
Effective July 1, 2007, laminated
woven sacks are classifiable under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheadings
6305.33.0050 and 6305.33.0080.
Laminated woven sacks were previously
classifiable under HTSUS subheading
6305.33.0020. Laminated woven sacks
are also classifiable under HTSUS
6305.33.0040. If entered with plastic
coating on both sides of the fabric
consisting of woven polypropylene strip
and/or woven polyethylene strip,
laminated woven sacks may be
classifiable under HTSUS subheadings
3923.21.0080, 3923.21.0095, and
3923.29.0000. If entered not closed on
one end or in roll form (including
sheets, lay-flat tubing, and sleeves),
laminated woven sacks may be
classifiable under other HTSUS
subheadings including 3917.39.0050,
3921.90.1100, 3921.90.1500, and
5903.90.2500. If the polypropylene
strips and/or polyethylene strips making
up the fabric measure more than 5
millimeters in width, laminated woven
sacks may be classifiable under other
HTSUS subheadings including
4601.99.0500, 4601.99.9000, and
4602.90.0000. Although HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and
19 CFR 351.213.
Final Results of Review
Commerce preliminary determined
that none of the 20 companies subject to
this review demonstrated eligibility for
separate rate status. Thus, each
company was found to be part of the
China-wide entity.5 A list of these
companies is in the attached appendix.
4 ‘‘Paper suitable for high quality print graphics,’’
as used herein, means paper having an ISO
brightness of 82 or higher and a Sheffield
Smoothness of 250 or less. Coated free sheet is an
example of a paper suitable for high quality print
graphics.
5 See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 21389.
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
As noted above, no interested party
submitted comments on Commerce’s
preliminary findings. As such, we made
no changes from the Preliminary
Results. Therefore, as a result of this
review, we continue to treat all 20
companies subject to this review as part
of the China-wide entity. The weighted
average dumping margin for the Chinawide entity is 91.73 percent.6
Assessment
Commerce shall determine, and U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP)
shall assess, antidumping duties on all
appropriate entries covered by this
review, in accordance with section
751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.212(b). These final results of review
remain unchanged from the Preliminary
Results. We will instruct CBP to apply
the China-wide entity ad valorem
assessment rate of 91.73 percent to all
entries of subject merchandise during
the POR that were exported by the
companies identified in the appendix to
this notice. Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions 15 days after
the publication date of the final results
of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective for all
shipments of LWS from China entered,
or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication
date of the final results of this
administrative review, as provided by
section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For
previously-investigated or reviewed
Chinese and non-Chinese companies
not under review in this segment that
received a separate rate in prior segment
of this proceeding, the cash deposit rate
will continue to be the companyspecific rate published for the most
recently-completed segment of this
proceeding in which the company
participated; (2) for all Chinese
exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a
separate rate, the cash deposit rate will
be that established for the China-wide
entity, which is 91.73 percent; and (3)
for all non-Chinese exporters of subject
merchandise which have not received
6 See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People’s
Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in
Harmony with Final Determination Under Section
129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act, 81 FR
23457 (April 21, 2016); see also Notice of
Antidumping Duty Order: Laminated Woven Sacks
from the People’s Republic of China, 73 FR 45941
(August 7, 2008); Implementation of Determinations
Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act: Certain New Pneumatic Off-theRoad Tires; Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe; Laminated Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled
Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the People’s
Republic of China, 77 FR 52683 (August 30, 2012).
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 235 / Monday, December 7, 2020 / Notices
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will
be the rate applicable to the Chinese
exporter that supplied that non-Chinese
exporter with the subject merchandise.
These cash deposit requirements, when
imposed, shall remain in effect until
further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the return or
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business
proprietary information in this segment
of the proceeding. Timely written
notification of the return or destruction
of APO materials or conversion to
judicial protective order is hereby
requested. Failure to comply with the
regulations and the term of an APO is
a violation subject sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these
final results in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19
CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: November 30, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Appendix
List of Companies Covered by This Review
1. Cangnan Color Make The Bag
2. Changle Baodu Plastic Co., Ltd.
3. First Way (H.K.) Limited
4. Han Shing Chemical Co., Ltd.
5. Jiangsu Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd.
6. Ningbo Yong Feng Packaging Co., Ltd.
7. Polywell Industrial Co.
8. Polywell Plastic Product Factory
9. Shandong Longxing Plastic Products
Company Ltd.
10. Shandong Qikai Plastics Product Co., Ltd.
11. Shandong Qilu Plastic Fabric Group, Ltd.
12. Shandong Shouguang Jianyuan Chun Co.,
Ltd.
13. Shandong Youlian Co., Ltd.
14. Wenzhou Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd.
15. Zibo Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd.
16. Zibo Linzi Luitong Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:32 Dec 04, 2020
Jkt 253001
17. Zibo Linzi Qitianli Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd.
18. Zibo Linzi Shuaiqiang Plastics Co., Ltd.
19. Zibo Linzi Worun Packing Product Co.,
Ltd.
20. Zibo Qigao Plastic Cement Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2020–26831 Filed 12–4–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–900]
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of this sunset
review, the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) finds that revocation of the
antidumping duty order on diamond
sawblades and parts thereof (diamond
sawblades) from the People’s Republic
of China (China) would be likely to lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping as indicated in the ‘‘Final
Results of Sunset Review’’ section of
this notice.
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Williams or Minoo Hatten,
AD/CVD Operations, Office I,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5166 or
(202) 482–1690, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
The antidumping duty order on
diamond sawblades from China was
published on November 4, 2009.1 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i)
and (ii), Commerce received a notice of
intent to participate in this sunset
review from Diamond Sawblades
Manufacturers’ Coalition (the petitioner)
within 15 days after the date of
publication of the Initiation Notice.2
The petitioner claimed interested party
status under sections 771(9)(C) and (F)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act).
Commerce received an adequate
substantive response to the Initiation
1 See
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof from
the People’s Republic of China and the Republic of
Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders, 74 FR 57145
(November 4, 2009).
2 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Review, 85
FR 47185 (August 4, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
Frm 00007
Notice from the domestic interested
party within the 30-day period specified
in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i). Commerce
received no substantive response from
any respondent interested parties. In
accordance with section 751(c)(3)(B) of
the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce
conducted an expedited, i.e., 120-day,
sunset review of the antidumping duty
order on diamond sawblades from
China.
Scope of the Order
Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
From the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of the Second Expedited
Sunset Review of the Antidumping
Duty Order
PO 00000
78827
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The merchandise subject to the order
is diamond sawblades. The diamond
sawblades subject to the order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
8202 to 8206 of the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
and may also enter under 6804.21.00.
While the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs
purposes, the written description is
dispositive. A full description of the
scope of the order is contained in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.3
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in this review are
addressed in the Issues and Decision
Memorandum, including the likelihood
of continuation or recurrence of
dumping in the event of revocation and
the magnitude of dumping margins
likely to prevail if the order was
revoked. Parties can find a complete
discussion of all issues raised in this
review and the corresponding
recommendations in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum, which is on file
electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Issues and
Decision Memorandum can be found at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/
index.html. The signed and electronic
versions of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Final Results of Sunset Review
Pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(c)
of the Act, Commerce determines that
revocation of the antidumping duty
order on diamond sawblades from
China would be likely to lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of Expedited
Second Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty
Order on Diamond Sawblades and Parts Thereof
from the People’s Republic of China,’’ dated
concurrently with and hereby adopted by this
notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
E:\FR\FM\07DEN1.SGM
07DEN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 235 (Monday, December 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78825-78827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26831]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-916]
Laminated Woven Sacks From the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of the Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order;
2018-2019
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that the 20
companies subject to the administrative review of the antidumping duty
(AD) order on laminated woven sacks (LWS) from the
[[Page 78826]]
People's Republic of China (China) are part of the China-wide entity
because none of the companies filed a separate rate application (SRA)
or separate rate certification (SRC). The period of review (POR) is
August 1, 2018 through July 31, 2019.
DATES: Applicable December 7, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Nicolas Mayora, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3053.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 17, 2020, Commerce published the Preliminary Results of
the administrative review of the AD order on LWS from China, wherein we
preliminary determined that the 20 companies subject to the review are
part of the China-wide entity because none of the companies filed an
SRA or SRC.\1\ We invited parties to submit comments on the Preliminary
Results. No party submitted comments. Accordingly, the final results
remain unchanged from the Preliminary Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People's Republic of
China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty Administrative
Review; 2018-2019, 85 FR 21388 (April 17, 2020) (Preliminary
Results).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative
reviews by 50 days.\2\ On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines
in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days.\3\ The deadline for
the final results of this review is now December 3, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to
Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,'' dated April 24, 2020.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' dated July 21, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is laminated woven sacks.
Laminated woven sacks are bags or sacks consisting of one or more plies
of fabric consisting of woven polypropylene strip and/or woven
polyethylene strip, regardless of the width of the strip; with or
without an extrusion coating of polypropylene and/or polyethylene on
one or both sides of the fabric; laminated by any method either to an
exterior ply of plastic film such as biaxially-oriented polypropylene
(BOPP) or to an exterior ply of paper that is suitable for high quality
print graphics; \4\ printed with three colors or more in register; with
or without lining; whether or not closed on one end; whether or not in
roll form (including sheets, lay-flat tubing, and sleeves); with or
without handles; with or without special closing features; not
exceeding one kilogram in weight. Laminated woven sacks are typically
used for retail packaging of consumer goods such as pet foods and bird
seed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Paper suitable for high quality print graphics,'' as used
herein, means paper having an ISO brightness of 82 or higher and a
Sheffield Smoothness of 250 or less. Coated free sheet is an example
of a paper suitable for high quality print graphics.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Effective July 1, 2007, laminated woven sacks are classifiable
under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
subheadings 6305.33.0050 and 6305.33.0080. Laminated woven sacks were
previously classifiable under HTSUS subheading 6305.33.0020. Laminated
woven sacks are also classifiable under HTSUS 6305.33.0040. If entered
with plastic coating on both sides of the fabric consisting of woven
polypropylene strip and/or woven polyethylene strip, laminated woven
sacks may be classifiable under HTSUS subheadings 3923.21.0080,
3923.21.0095, and 3923.29.0000. If entered not closed on one end or in
roll form (including sheets, lay-flat tubing, and sleeves), laminated
woven sacks may be classifiable under other HTSUS subheadings including
3917.39.0050, 3921.90.1100, 3921.90.1500, and 5903.90.2500. If the
polypropylene strips and/or polyethylene strips making up the fabric
measure more than 5 millimeters in width, laminated woven sacks may be
classifiable under other HTSUS subheadings including 4601.99.0500,
4601.99.9000, and 4602.90.0000. Although HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the
scope of the order is dispositive.
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), and 19 CFR 351.213.
Final Results of Review
Commerce preliminary determined that none of the 20 companies
subject to this review demonstrated eligibility for separate rate
status. Thus, each company was found to be part of the China-wide
entity.\5\ A list of these companies is in the attached appendix.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Preliminary Results, 85 FR at 21389.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As noted above, no interested party submitted comments on
Commerce's preliminary findings. As such, we made no changes from the
Preliminary Results. Therefore, as a result of this review, we continue
to treat all 20 companies subject to this review as part of the China-
wide entity. The weighted average dumping margin for the China-wide
entity is 91.73 percent.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Laminated Woven Sacks from the People's Republic of
China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final
Determination Under Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
81 FR 23457 (April 21, 2016); see also Notice of Antidumping Duty
Order: Laminated Woven Sacks from the People's Republic of China, 73
FR 45941 (August 7, 2008); Implementation of Determinations Under
Section 129 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act: Certain New
Pneumatic Off-the-Road Tires; Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel
Pipe; Laminated Woven Sacks; and Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and
Tube from the People's Republic of China, 77 FR 52683 (August 30,
2012).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment
Commerce shall determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries
covered by this review, in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b). These final results of review remain
unchanged from the Preliminary Results. We will instruct CBP to apply
the China-wide entity ad valorem assessment rate of 91.73 percent to
all entries of subject merchandise during the POR that were exported by
the companies identified in the appendix to this notice. Commerce
intends to issue assessment instructions 15 days after the publication
date of the final results of this review.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective for all
shipments of LWS from China entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption on or after the publication date of the final results of
this administrative review, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the
Act: (1) For previously-investigated or reviewed Chinese and non-
Chinese companies not under review in this segment that received a
separate rate in prior segment of this proceeding, the cash deposit
rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the
most recently-completed segment of this proceeding in which the company
participated; (2) for all Chinese exporters of subject merchandise that
have not been found to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash deposit
rate will be that established for the China-wide entity, which is 91.73
percent; and (3) for all non-Chinese exporters of subject merchandise
which have not received
[[Page 78827]]
their own rate, the cash deposit rate will be the rate applicable to
the Chinese exporter that supplied that non-Chinese exporter with the
subject merchandise. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed,
shall remain in effect until further notice.
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder to importers of their
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation
of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply
with this requirement could result in Commerce's presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent
assessment of double antidumping duties.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under the APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of
the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order
is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the
term of an APO is a violation subject sanction.
Notification to Interested Parties
We are issuing and publishing these final results in accordance
with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(h).
Dated: November 30, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Companies Covered by This Review
1. Cangnan Color Make The Bag
2. Changle Baodu Plastic Co., Ltd.
3. First Way (H.K.) Limited
4. Han Shing Chemical Co., Ltd.
5. Jiangsu Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd.
6. Ningbo Yong Feng Packaging Co., Ltd.
7. Polywell Industrial Co.
8. Polywell Plastic Product Factory
9. Shandong Longxing Plastic Products Company Ltd.
10. Shandong Qikai Plastics Product Co., Ltd.
11. Shandong Qilu Plastic Fabric Group, Ltd.
12. Shandong Shouguang Jianyuan Chun Co., Ltd.
13. Shandong Youlian Co., Ltd.
14. Wenzhou Hotson Plastics Co., Ltd.
15. Zibo Aifudi Plastic Packaging Co., Ltd.
16. Zibo Linzi Luitong Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd.
17. Zibo Linzi Qitianli Plastic Fabric Co., Ltd.
18. Zibo Linzi Shuaiqiang Plastics Co., Ltd.
19. Zibo Linzi Worun Packing Product Co., Ltd.
20. Zibo Qigao Plastic Cement Co., Ltd.
[FR Doc. 2020-26831 Filed 12-4-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
