Certain Active Optical Cables and Products Containing the Same; Institution of Investigation, 78361 [2020-26682]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 234 / Friday, December 4, 2020 / Notices
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 30, 2020.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
[FR Doc. 2020–26660 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337–TA–1233]
Certain Active Optical Cables and
Products Containing the Same;
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
October 29, 2020, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of Cosemi Technologies, Inc. of
Irvine, California. A supplement to the
complaint was filed on November 16,
2020. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain active optical cables and
products containing the same by reason
of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent No. 8,948,197 (‘‘the ’197 patent’’),
U.S. Patent No. 9,641,250 (‘‘the ’250
patent’’), U.S. Patent No. 9,971,115 (‘‘the
’115 patent’’), and U.S. Patent No.
9,979,479 (‘‘the ’479 patent’’). The
complaint further alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as
required by the applicable Federal
Statute. The complainant requests that
the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the
investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:18 Dec 03, 2020
Jkt 253001
Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
November 30, 2020, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
5, 6, 13–15, and 19 of the ’197 patent;
claims 1–5, 8–10, and 13 of the ’250
patent; claims 1–6, 9, and 12–16 of the
’115 patent, and claims 15, 18, and 25
of the ’479 patent; and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is ‘‘active optical data
cables, including USB cables (USB A,
A/C, C/C [USB and Display Port altmode variations], and A/micro-B
[hybrid]), HDMI cables, and Display
Port cables and products incorporating
the same’’;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is:
Cosemi Technologies, Inc., 1370
Reynolds Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine,
CA 92614
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
EverPro Technologies Company Ltd., #9
Guanggu Road, Wuhan, Hubei
430073, China
Fibbr Technologies, #9 Optics Valley
Avenue, East Lake Hi-tech
Development Zone, Wuhan, Hubei
430073, China
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
78361
Logitech Inc., 7700 Gateway Blvd.,
Newark, CA 94560
Facebook Technologies, LLC, 1 Hacker
Way, Menlo Park, CA 94025
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not be named as a
party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 30, 2020.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2020–26682 Filed 12–3–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
E:\FR\FM\04DEN1.SGM
04DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 234 (Friday, December 4, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 78361]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26682]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Inv. No. 337-TA-1233]
Certain Active Optical Cables and Products Containing the Same;
Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 29, 2020, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Cosemi
Technologies, Inc. of Irvine, California. A supplement to the complaint
was filed on November 16, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain active optical cables and products containing
the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
8,948,197 (``the '197 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 9,641,250 (``the '250
patent''), U.S. Patent No. 9,971,115 (``the '115 patent''), and U.S.
Patent No. 9,979,479 (``the '479 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation,
issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on November 30, 2020, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 5, 6, 13-15, and 19 of the '197 patent; claims 1-5, 8-10, and
13 of the '250 patent; claims 1-6, 9, and 12-16 of the '115 patent, and
claims 15, 18, and 25 of the '479 patent; and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``active optical data
cables, including USB cables (USB A, A/C, C/C [USB and Display Port
alt-mode variations], and A/micro-B [hybrid]), HDMI cables, and Display
Port cables and products incorporating the same'';
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is:
Cosemi Technologies, Inc., 1370 Reynolds Avenue, Suite 100, Irvine, CA
92614
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
EverPro Technologies Company Ltd., #9 Guanggu Road, Wuhan, Hubei
430073, China
Fibbr Technologies, #9 Optics Valley Avenue, East Lake Hi-tech
Development Zone, Wuhan, Hubei 430073, China
Logitech Inc., 7700 Gateway Blvd., Newark, CA 94560
Facebook Technologies, LLC, 1 Hacker Way, Menlo Park, CA 94025
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be named as a
party to this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 30, 2020.
Katherine Hiner,
Supervisory Attorney.
[FR Doc. 2020-26682 Filed 12-3-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P