Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof, 76601 [2020-26357]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices United States Trade Representative on the day of their issuance. The investigation is terminated. While temporary remote operating procedures are in place in response to COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is not able to serve parties that have not retained counsel or otherwise provided a point of contact for electronic service. Accordingly, pursuant to Commission Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR 201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission orders that the Complainant complete service for any party without a method of electronic service noted on the attached Certificate of Service and shall file proof of service on the Electronic Document Information System (EDIS). The Commission vote for this determination took place on November 23, 2020. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 23, 2020. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–26277 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1225] Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. The investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:03 Nov 27, 2020 Jkt 253001 documents filed in connection with this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone 202–205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on October 28, 2020, based on a complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd. (‘‘Solas’’) of Dublin, Ireland. 85 FR 68368–69 (Oct. 28, 2020). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,139,007; 7,573,068; and 7,868,880. The complaint further alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission’s notice of investigation named the following as respondents: Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California; Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; Samsung Display Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both of Gyeonggi-do, South Korea; Dell Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas; Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; LG Electronics Inc. and LG Display Co., Ltd., both of Seoul, South Korea; LG Display America, Inc. of San Jose, California; and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is participating in the investigation. On November 6, 2020, Solas moved to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. No party opposed the motion. On November 12, 2020, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 7), granting the unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. The ID finds that the motion for termination satisfies Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1)) and that termination of the investigation is not contrary to the public interest. The ID also finds that no extraordinary PO 00000 Frm 00088 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 76601 circumstances exist that would prevent the requested termination. No party petitioned for review. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The investigation is terminated. The Commission vote for this determination took place on November 24, 2020. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part 210. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 24, 2020. William Bishop, Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer. [FR Doc. 2020–26357 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1546–1549 (Preliminary)] Thermal Paper From Germany, Japan, Korea, and Spain Determination On the basis of the record 1 developed in the subject investigations, the United States International Trade Commission (‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’), that there is a reasonable indication that industries in the United States are materially injured by reason of imports of thermal paper from Germany, Japan, Korea, and Spain, provided for in subheadings 4811.80.80 and 4811.80.90 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value (‘‘LTFV’’).2 Commencement of Final Phase Investigation Pursuant to section 207.18 of the Commission’s rules, the Commission also gives notice of the commencement of the final phase of its investigations. The Commission will issue a final phase notice of scheduling, which will be published in the Federal Register as provided in section 207.21 of the Commission’s rules, upon notice from the U.S. Department of Commerce (‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative preliminary determinations in the 1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)). 2 85 FR 65073 (October 14, 2020). E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM 30NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1225]


Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on 
Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain 
Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof

AGENCY: International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the International Trade Commission 
has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order 
No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') terminating 
the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. The 
investigation is terminated.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may 
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may 
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on 
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal, telephone 202-205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on October 28, 2020, based on a complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd. 
(``Solas'') of Dublin, Ireland. 85 FR 68368-69 (Oct. 28, 2020). The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and 
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. 
Patent Nos. 8,139,007; 7,573,068; and 7,868,880. The complaint further 
alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission's notice 
of investigation named the following as respondents: Apple Inc. of 
Cupertino, California; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California; 
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey; 
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both of 
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea; Dell Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas; 
Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; LG Electronics Inc. and LG 
Display Co., Ltd., both of Seoul, South Korea; LG Display America, Inc. 
of San Jose, California; and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood 
Cliffs, New Jersey. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is 
participating in the investigation.
    On November 6, 2020, Solas moved to terminate the investigation in 
its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. No party opposed the 
motion.
    On November 12, 2020, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 7), 
granting the unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its 
entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. The ID finds that the 
motion for termination satisfies Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 
210.21(a)(1)) and that termination of the investigation is not contrary 
to the public interest. The ID also finds that no extraordinary 
circumstances exist that would prevent the requested termination. No 
party petitioned for review.
    The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The 
investigation is terminated.
    The Commission vote for this determination took place on November 
24, 2020.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 
part 210.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 24, 2020.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-26357 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.