Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof, 76601 [2020-26357]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 230 / Monday, November 30, 2020 / Notices
United States Trade Representative on
the day of their issuance. The
investigation is terminated.
While temporary remote operating
procedures are in place in response to
COVID–19, the Office of the Secretary is
not able to serve parties that have not
retained counsel or otherwise provided
a point of contact for electronic service.
Accordingly, pursuant to Commission
Rules 201.16(a) and 210.7(a)(1) (19 CFR
201.16(a), 210.7(a)(1)), the Commission
orders that the Complainant complete
service for any party without a method
of electronic service noted on the
attached Certificate of Service and shall
file proof of service on the Electronic
Document Information System (EDIS).
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on November
23, 2020.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in Part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 23, 2020.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–26277 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1225]
Notice of a Commission Determination
Not to Review an Initial Determination
Terminating the Investigation in Its
Entirety Based on Withdrawal of the
Complaint; Termination of the
Investigation; Certain Active Matrix
OLED Display Devices and
Components Thereof
International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the International Trade Commission has
determined not to review an initial
determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 7) of
the presiding administrative law judge
(‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the investigation
based on withdrawal of the complaint.
The investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–2310. Copies of non-confidential
TKELLEY on DSKBCP9HB2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:03 Nov 27, 2020
Jkt 253001
documents filed in connection with this
investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised
that information on this matter can be
obtained by contacting the
Commission’s TDD terminal, telephone
202–205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on October 28, 2020, based on a
complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd.
(‘‘Solas’’) of Dublin, Ireland. 85 FR
68368–69 (Oct. 28, 2020). The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon
the importation into the United States,
the sale for importation, and the sale
within the United States after
importation of certain active matrix
OLED display devices and components
thereof by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos.
8,139,007; 7,573,068; and 7,868,880.
The complaint further alleges the
existence of a domestic industry. The
Commission’s notice of investigation
named the following as respondents:
Apple Inc. of Cupertino, California;
Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego,
California; Samsung Electronics
America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New
Jersey; Samsung Display Co., Ltd. and
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both of
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea; Dell
Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas;
Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago,
Illinois; LG Electronics Inc. and LG
Display Co., Ltd., both of Seoul, South
Korea; LG Display America, Inc. of San
Jose, California; and LG Electronics
USA, Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New
Jersey. The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations is participating in the
investigation.
On November 6, 2020, Solas moved to
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on withdrawal of the
complaint. No party opposed the
motion.
On November 12, 2020, the ALJ
issued the subject ID (Order No. 7),
granting the unopposed motion to
terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on withdrawal of the
complaint. The ID finds that the motion
for termination satisfies Commission
Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR 210.21(a)(1))
and that termination of the investigation
is not contrary to the public interest.
The ID also finds that no extraordinary
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
76601
circumstances exist that would prevent
the requested termination. No party
petitioned for review.
The Commission has determined not
to review the subject ID. The
investigation is terminated.
The Commission vote for this
determination took place on November
24, 2020.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR part
210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 24, 2020.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information
Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–26357 Filed 11–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation Nos. 731–TA–1546–1549
(Preliminary)]
Thermal Paper From Germany, Japan,
Korea, and Spain
Determination
On the basis of the record 1 developed
in the subject investigations, the United
States International Trade Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) determines, pursuant
to the Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’),
that there is a reasonable indication that
industries in the United States are
materially injured by reason of imports
of thermal paper from Germany, Japan,
Korea, and Spain, provided for in
subheadings 4811.80.80 and 4811.80.90
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States, that are alleged to be
sold in the United States at less than fair
value (‘‘LTFV’’).2
Commencement of Final Phase
Investigation
Pursuant to section 207.18 of the
Commission’s rules, the Commission
also gives notice of the commencement
of the final phase of its investigations.
The Commission will issue a final phase
notice of scheduling, which will be
published in the Federal Register as
provided in section 207.21 of the
Commission’s rules, upon notice from
the U.S. Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) of affirmative
preliminary determinations in the
1 The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19
CFR 207.2(f)).
2 85 FR 65073 (October 14, 2020).
E:\FR\FM\30NON1.SGM
30NON1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 230 (Monday, November 30, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Page 76601]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-26357]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1225]
Notice of a Commission Determination Not to Review an Initial
Determination Terminating the Investigation in Its Entirety Based on
Withdrawal of the Complaint; Termination of the Investigation; Certain
Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof
AGENCY: International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the International Trade Commission
has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order
No. 7) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') terminating
the investigation based on withdrawal of the complaint. The
investigation is terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation may
be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. General information concerning the Commission may
also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD
terminal, telephone 202-205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on October 28, 2020, based on a complaint filed by Solas OLED Ltd.
(``Solas'') of Dublin, Ireland. 85 FR 68368-69 (Oct. 28, 2020). The
complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, based upon the importation into the United
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and
components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S.
Patent Nos. 8,139,007; 7,573,068; and 7,868,880. The complaint further
alleges the existence of a domestic industry. The Commission's notice
of investigation named the following as respondents: Apple Inc. of
Cupertino, California; Sony Electronics Inc. of San Diego, California;
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. of Ridgefield Park, New Jersey;
Samsung Display Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., both of
Gyeonggi-do, South Korea; Dell Technologies Inc. of Round Rock, Texas;
Motorola Mobility LLC of Chicago, Illinois; LG Electronics Inc. and LG
Display Co., Ltd., both of Seoul, South Korea; LG Display America, Inc.
of San Jose, California; and LG Electronics USA, Inc. of Englewood
Cliffs, New Jersey. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
participating in the investigation.
On November 6, 2020, Solas moved to terminate the investigation in
its entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. No party opposed the
motion.
On November 12, 2020, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 7),
granting the unopposed motion to terminate the investigation in its
entirety based on withdrawal of the complaint. The ID finds that the
motion for termination satisfies Commission Rule 210.21(a)(1) (19 CFR
210.21(a)(1)) and that termination of the investigation is not contrary
to the public interest. The ID also finds that no extraordinary
circumstances exist that would prevent the requested termination. No
party petitioned for review.
The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The
investigation is terminated.
The Commission vote for this determination took place on November
24, 2020.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR
part 210.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 24, 2020.
William Bishop,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020-26357 Filed 11-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
