Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Renewal of Information Collection; Comment Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield; Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators, 74981-74983 [2020-25974]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
this requirement could result in
Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Orders
This notice also serves as a reminder
to all parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written
notification of the return/destruction of
APO materials or conversion to judicial
protective order is hereby requested.
Failure to comply with the regulations
and terms of an APO is a violation
which is subject to sanction.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Dated: November 19, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–25951 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
Review and Approval; Renewal of
Information Collection; Comment
Request; EU–U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion
on the List of Arbitrators
International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Information
Collection, request for comment.
AGENCY:
The Department of
Commerce, in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(PRA), invites the general public and
other Federal agencies to comment on
proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the
impact of our information collection
requirements and minimize the public’s
reporting burden. The purpose of this
notice is to allow for 60 days of public
comment preceding submission of the
collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration,
comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received
on or before January 25, 2021.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments by
email to Towanda Carey, ITA
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration at
PRAcomments@doc.gov. Please
reference OMB Control Number 0625–
0277 in the subject line of your
comments. Do not submit Confidential
Business Information or otherwise
sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection
activities should be directed to David
Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor,
Department of Commerce, International
Trade Administration via email at
privacyshield@trade.gov, or tel. 202–
482–1512. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at
https://www.privacyshield.gov/
article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
ADDRESSES:
I. Abstract
The EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the
Department) and the European
Commission (Commission) to provide
companies on both sides of the Atlantic
with a mechanism to comply with data
protection requirements when
transferring personal data from the
European Union to the United States in
support of transatlantic commerce. On
July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
adequate to enable data transfers under
EU law, and on August 1, 2016, the
Department began accepting selfcertifications from U.S. companies to
join the program (81 FR 47752; July 22,
2016).
On July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice
of the European Union (CJEU) issued a
judgment declaring as ‘‘invalid’’ the
Commission’s decision on the adequacy
of the protection provided by the EU–
U.S. Privacy Shield and as a result the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework is
no longer a valid mechanism to comply
with EU data protection requirements
when transferring personal data from
the European Union to the United
States. That judgment does not relieve
participants in the EU–U.S. Privacy
Shield of their obligations under the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.
The Department and the Commission
are discussing the potential for an
enhanced EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework to comply with the July 16,
2020 judgment by the CJEU. The
Department continues to administer the
Privacy Shield program while those
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74981
discussions proceed. For more
information on the Privacy Shield, visit
https://www.privacyshield.gov/
welcome.
As described in Annex I of the EU–
U.S. Privacy Shield Framework, the
Department and the Commission
committed to implement an arbitration
mechanism to provide European
individuals with the ability to invoke
binding arbitration to determine, for
residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations
under the Privacy Shield. Organizations
voluntarily self-certify to the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework and, upon
certification, the commitments the
organization has made to comply with
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
become legally enforceable under U.S.
law. Organizations that self-certify to
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework
commit to binding arbitration of
residual claims if a European individual
chooses to exercise that option. Under
the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield
Panel (consisting of one or three
arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has
the authority to impose individualspecific, non-monetary equitable relief
(such as access, correction, deletion, or
return of the European individual’s data
in question) necessary to remedy the
violation of the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework only with respect to the
individual. The parties will select the
arbitrators from the list of arbitrators
described below.
The Department and the Commission
seek to maintain a list of at least 20
arbitrators. To be eligible for inclusion
on the list, applicants must be admitted
to practice law in the United States and
have expertise in both U.S. privacy law
and EU data protection law. Applicants
shall not be subject to any instructions
from, or be affiliated with, any Privacy
Shield organization, or the U.S., EU, or
any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority or enforcement authority.
The Department previously requested
and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control
No. 0625–0277), which expires on 1/31/
2021, and now seeks renewal of this
information collection. Although the
Department is not currently seeking
additional applications, it may do so in
the future as appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators, eligible individuals will be
evaluated on the basis of independence,
integrity, and expertise:
Independence
—Freedom from bias and prejudice.
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
74982
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
Integrity
—Held in the highest regard by peers for
integrity, fairness and good judgment.
—Demonstrates high ethical standards
and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Required
—Admission to practice law in the
United States.
—Level of demonstrated expertise in
U.S. privacy law and EU data
protection law.
Applications
Other Expertise That may Be
Considered Includes Any of the
Following
—Relevant educational degrees and
professional licenses.
—Relevant professional or academic
experience or legal practice.
—Relevant training or experience in
arbitration or other forms of dispute
resolution.
Evaluation of applications for
inclusion on the list of arbitrators will
be undertaken by the Department and
the Commission. Selected applicants
will remain on the list for a period of
three years, absent exceptional
circumstances; change in eligibility, or
for cause, renewable for one additional
period of three years.
The Department selected the
International Centre for Dispute
Resolution-American Arbitration
Association (ICDR–AAA) as
administrator for Privacy Shield
arbitrations brought under either the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework or
the Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework. Among other things, the
ICDR–AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection
and timely payment of arbitrator fees
and other expenses.
Arbitrators are expected to commit
their time and effort when included on
the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield List of
Arbitrators and to take reasonable steps
to minimize the costs or fees of the
arbitration.
Arbitrators are subject to a code of
conduct consistent with Annex I of the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and
generally accepted ethical standards for
arbitrators. The Department and the
Commission agreed to adopt an existing,
well-established set of U.S. arbitral
procedures to govern the arbitral
proceedings, subject to considerations
identified in Annex I of the EU–U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework, including
that materials submitted to arbitrators
will be treated confidentially and will
only be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
please visit https://
www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=GArbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration
procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the
EU–U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and
the Swiss–U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework)
Applications must be typewritten and
should be headed ‘‘Application for
Inclusion on the EU–U.S. Privacy Shield
List of Arbitrators.’’ Applications should
include the following information, and
each section of the application should
be numbered as indicated:
—Name of applicant.
—Address, telephone number, and
email address.
1. Independence
—Description of the applicant’s
affiliations with any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., EU, any EU
Member State or any other
governmental authority, public
authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
—On a separate page, the names,
addresses, telephone, and fax
numbers of three individuals willing
to provide information concerning the
applicant’s qualifications for service,
including the applicant’s character,
reputation, reliability, and judgment.
—Description of the applicant’s
willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an
arbitrator.
3. Expertise
—Demonstration of admittance to
practice law in the United States.
—Relevant academic degrees and
professional training and licensing.
—Current employment, including title,
description of responsibility, name
and address of employer, and name
and telephone number of supervisor
or other reference.
—Employment history, including the
dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of
responsibilities.
—Description of expertise in U.S.
privacy law and EU data protection
law.
—Description of training or experience
in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution, if applicable.
—A list of publications, testimony, and
speeches, if any, concerning U.S.
privacy law and EU data protection
law, with copies appended.
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the Department is not
currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future
as appropriate. The Department
previously requested and obtained
approval of this information collection
(OMB Control No. 0625–0277), which
expires on 1/31/2021, and now seeks
renewal of this information collection.
Future applications would be submitted
to the Department by email. More
information on the arbitration
mechanism may be found at https://
www.privacyshield.gov/
article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625–0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission,
revision of a current information
collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
40.
Estimated Time per Response: 240
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 160.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to
Public: $0.
Respondent’s Obligation: Required to
obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department’s
statutory authority to foster, promote,
and develop international commerce (15
U.S.C. 1512).
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to
permit the Department/Bureau to: (a)
Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper functions of the Department,
including whether the information will
have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the
accuracy of our estimate of the time and
cost burden for this proposed collection,
including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
Evaluate ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) Minimize the
reporting burden on those who are to
respond, including the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments that you submit in
response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or
summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information
collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number,
email address, or other personal
identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 227 / Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Notices
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Information Officer, Commerce
Department.
[FR Doc. 2020–25974 Filed 11–23–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–489–829]
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar From
the Republic of Turkey: Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review and Preliminary
Determination of No-Shipments; 2018–
2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily determines
that producers or exporters of steel
concrete reinforcing bar (rebar) from the
Republic of Turkey (Turkey) subject to
this review made sales of subject
merchandise at less than normal value
during the period of review (POR) July
1, 2018 through June 30, 2019.
Additionally, we preliminarily find that
one company made no shipments
during the POR. We invite all interested
parties to comment on these preliminary
results.
DATES: Applicable November 24, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Copyak or Thomas Dunne, AD/
CVD Operations, Office VII,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3642 or
(202) 482–2328, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
Background
On July 14, 2017, Commerce
published the antidumping duty order
on rebar from Turkey.1 On September 9,
2019, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(c)(1)(i), Commerce initiated an
1 See Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the
Republic of Turkey and Japan: Amended Final
Affirmative Antidumping Duty Determination for
the Republic of Turkey and Antidumping Duty
Orders, 82 FR 32532 (July 14, 2017) (Order).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 Nov 23, 2020
Jkt 253001
administrative review of the Order,
covering eight companies.2 On February
20, 2020, Commerce selected Icdas Celik
Enerji Tersane ve Ulasim Sanayi A.S.
(Icdas) and Kaptan Demir Celik
Endu¨strisi ve Ticaret A.S. (Kaptan
Demir) as the mandatory respondents
for this review.3 On March 26, 2020,
pursuant to section 751(a)(3)(A) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act),
and 19 CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce
extended the time limit for issuing the
preliminary results of this
administrative review to May 29, 2020.4
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all
deadlines in administrative reviews by
50 days, thereby extending the deadline
for issuing the preliminary results of
this administrative review to July 20,
2020.5 On July 19, 2020, pursuant to
section 751(a)(3)(A) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.213(h)(2), Commerce again
extended the time limit for issuing the
preliminary results of this
administrative review to September 18,
2020.6 On July 21, 2020, Commerce
again tolled all deadlines for
preliminary and final results in
administrative reviews by an additional
60 days.7 Therefore, the deadline for the
preliminary results of this
administrative review is now November
17, 2020.
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the Order is
steel concrete reinforcing bar from
Turkey. For a full description of the
scope, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.8
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
47251 (September 9, 2019) (Initiation Notice).
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection for
the Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from the Republic of
Turkey, 2018–2019,’’ dated February 20, 2019.
Subsequently, Icdas filed a letter on the record
stating that two of the company names listed in the
Initiation Notice—Icdas Celik Enerji Tersane ve
Ulasim and Icdas—are the same company. See
Icdas’ Letter, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar from
the Republic of Turkey; Icdas’ Clarification Letter,’’
dated February 21, 2020.
4 See Memorandum, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review,’’ dated March 26,
2020.
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Steel Concrete Reinforcing
Bar from the Republic of Turkey: Extension of
Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Administrative Review,’’ dated June 19, 2020.
7 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020.
8 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review: Steel Concrete Reinforcing
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74983
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act. Export price is calculated in
accordance with section 772 of the Act.
Normal value is calculated in
accordance with section 773 of the Act.
For a full description of the
methodology underlying these
preliminary results, see the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum. A list of topics
discussed in the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum is attached as an
appendix to this notice. The Preliminary
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments
On September 11, 2019, Habas Sinai
ve Tibbi Gazlar Istihsal Endu¨strisi A.S
(Habas) submitted a letter certifying that
it had no exports or sales of subject
merchandise into the United States
during the POR.9 U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) did not have
any information to contradict these
claims of no shipments during the
POR.10 Therefore, we preliminarily
determine that Habas did not have any
shipments of subject merchandise
during the POR. Consistent with
Commerce’s practice, we will not
rescind the review with respect to Habas
but rather will complete the review and
issue instructions to CBP based on the
final results.11
Rates for Non-Examined Companies
The statute and Commerce’s
regulations do not address the
establishment of a rate to be applied to
Bar from the Republic of Turkey; 2018–2019’’ dated
concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this
notice (Preliminary Decision Memorandum).
9 See Preliminary Decision Memorandum at 5.
10 Id.
11 See, e.g., Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp
from Thailand; Preliminary Results of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review, Partial Rescission of
Review, Preliminary Determination of No
Shipments; 2012–2013, 79 FR 15951, 15952 (March
24, 2014), unchanged in Certain Frozen Warmwater
Shrimp from Thailand: Final Results of
Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Final
Determination of No Shipments, and Partial
Rescission of Review; 2012–2013, 79 FR 51306,
51307 (August 28, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\24NON1.SGM
24NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 227 (Tuesday, November 24, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74981-74983]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25974]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for Review and Approval; Renewal
of Information Collection; Comment Request; EU-U.S. Privacy Shield;
Invitation for Applications for Inclusion on the List of Arbitrators
AGENCY: International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of Information Collection, request for comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, in accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA), invites the general public and other
Federal agencies to comment on proposed, and continuing information
collections, which helps us assess the impact of our information
collection requirements and minimize the public's reporting burden. The
purpose of this notice is to allow for 60 days of public comment
preceding submission of the collection to OMB.
DATES: To ensure consideration, comments regarding this proposed
information collection must be received on or before January 25, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written comments by
email to Towanda Carey, ITA Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of
Commerce, International Trade Administration at [email protected].
Please reference OMB Control Number 0625-0277 in the subject line of
your comments. Do not submit Confidential Business Information or
otherwise sensitive or protected information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
specific questions related to collection activities should be directed
to David Ritchie, Senior Policy Advisor, Department of Commerce,
International Trade Administration via email at
[email protected], or tel. 202-482-1512. More information on the
arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
The EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework was designed by the U.S.
Department of Commerce (the Department) and the European Commission
(Commission) to provide companies on both sides of the Atlantic with a
mechanism to comply with data protection requirements when transferring
personal data from the European Union to the United States in support
of transatlantic commerce. On July 12, 2016, the Commission deemed the
EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework adequate to enable data transfers
under EU law, and on August 1, 2016, the Department began accepting
self-certifications from U.S. companies to join the program (81 FR
47752; July 22, 2016).
On July 16, 2020, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU)
issued a judgment declaring as ``invalid'' the Commission's decision on
the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
and as a result the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework is no longer a
valid mechanism to comply with EU data protection requirements when
transferring personal data from the European Union to the United
States. That judgment does not relieve participants in the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield of their obligations under the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework. The Department and the Commission are discussing the
potential for an enhanced EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework to comply
with the July 16, 2020 judgment by the CJEU. The Department continues
to administer the Privacy Shield program while those discussions
proceed. For more information on the Privacy Shield, visit https://www.privacyshield.gov/welcome.
As described in Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework,
the Department and the Commission committed to implement an arbitration
mechanism to provide European individuals with the ability to invoke
binding arbitration to determine, for residual claims, whether an
organization has violated its obligations under the Privacy Shield.
Organizations voluntarily self-certify to the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and, upon certification, the commitments the organization has
made to comply with the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework become legally
enforceable under U.S. law. Organizations that self-certify to the EU-
U.S. Privacy Shield Framework commit to binding arbitration of residual
claims if a European individual chooses to exercise that option. Under
the arbitration option, a Privacy Shield Panel (consisting of one or
three arbitrators, as agreed by the parties) has the authority to
impose individual-specific, non-monetary equitable relief (such as
access, correction, deletion, or return of the European individual's
data in question) necessary to remedy the violation of the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework only with respect to the individual. The
parties will select the arbitrators from the list of arbitrators
described below.
The Department and the Commission seek to maintain a list of at
least 20 arbitrators. To be eligible for inclusion on the list,
applicants must be admitted to practice law in the United States and
have expertise in both U.S. privacy law and EU data protection law.
Applicants shall not be subject to any instructions from, or be
affiliated with, any Privacy Shield organization, or the U.S., EU, or
any EU Member State or any other governmental authority, public
authority or enforcement authority.
The Department previously requested and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control No. 0625-0277), which expires on 1/
31/2021, and now seeks renewal of this information collection. Although
the Department is not currently seeking additional applications, it may
do so in the future as appropriate.
To be considered for inclusion on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield List
of Arbitrators, eligible individuals will be evaluated on the basis of
independence, integrity, and expertise:
Independence
--Freedom from bias and prejudice.
[[Page 74982]]
Integrity
--Held in the highest regard by peers for integrity, fairness and good
judgment.
--Demonstrates high ethical standards and commitment necessary to be an
arbitrator.
Expertise
Required
--Admission to practice law in the United States.
--Level of demonstrated expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU data
protection law.
Other Expertise That may Be Considered Includes Any of the Following
--Relevant educational degrees and professional licenses.
--Relevant professional or academic experience or legal practice.
--Relevant training or experience in arbitration or other forms of
dispute resolution.
Evaluation of applications for inclusion on the list of arbitrators
will be undertaken by the Department and the Commission. Selected
applicants will remain on the list for a period of three years, absent
exceptional circumstances; change in eligibility, or for cause,
renewable for one additional period of three years.
The Department selected the International Centre for Dispute
Resolution-American Arbitration Association (ICDR-AAA) as administrator
for Privacy Shield arbitrations brought under either the EU-U.S.
Privacy Shield Framework or the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework.
Among other things, the ICDR-AAA facilitates arbitrator fee
arrangements, including the collection and timely payment of arbitrator
fees and other expenses.
Arbitrators are expected to commit their time and effort when
included on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators and to take
reasonable steps to minimize the costs or fees of the arbitration.
Arbitrators are subject to a code of conduct consistent with Annex
I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework and generally accepted
ethical standards for arbitrators. The Department and the Commission
agreed to adopt an existing, well-established set of U.S. arbitral
procedures to govern the arbitral proceedings, subject to
considerations identified in Annex I of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework, including that materials submitted to arbitrators will be
treated confidentially and will only be used in connection with the
arbitration. For more information, please visit https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=G-Arbitration-Procedures where you can
find information on the arbitration procedures. (Please note that the
Arbitration procedures apply to both the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield
Framework and the Swiss-U.S. Privacy Shield Framework)
Applications
Applications must be typewritten and should be headed ``Application
for Inclusion on the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield List of Arbitrators.''
Applications should include the following information, and each section
of the application should be numbered as indicated:
--Name of applicant.
--Address, telephone number, and email address.
1. Independence
--Description of the applicant's affiliations with any Privacy Shield
organization, or the U.S., EU, any EU Member State or any other
governmental authority, public authority, or enforcement authority.
2. Integrity
--On a separate page, the names, addresses, telephone, and fax numbers
of three individuals willing to provide information concerning the
applicant's qualifications for service, including the applicant's
character, reputation, reliability, and judgment.
--Description of the applicant's willingness and ability to make time
commitments necessary to be an arbitrator.
3. Expertise
--Demonstration of admittance to practice law in the United States.
--Relevant academic degrees and professional training and licensing.
--Current employment, including title, description of responsibility,
name and address of employer, and name and telephone number of
supervisor or other reference.
--Employment history, including the dates and addresses of each prior
position and a summary of responsibilities.
--Description of expertise in U.S. privacy law and EU data protection
law.
--Description of training or experience in arbitration or other forms
of dispute resolution, if applicable.
--A list of publications, testimony, and speeches, if any, concerning
U.S. privacy law and EU data protection law, with copies appended.
II. Method of Collection
As stated above, the Department is not currently seeking additional
applications, but may do so in the future as appropriate. The
Department previously requested and obtained approval of this
information collection (OMB Control No. 0625-0277), which expires on 1/
31/2021, and now seeks renewal of this information collection. Future
applications would be submitted to the Department by email. More
information on the arbitration mechanism may be found at https://www.privacyshield.gov/article?id=ANNEX-I-introduction.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0625-0277.
Form Number(s): None.
Type of Review: Regular submission, revision of a current
information collection.
Affected Public: Private individuals.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 40.
Estimated Time per Response: 240 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 160.
Estimated Total Annual Cost to Public: $0.
Respondent's Obligation: Required to obtain or retain benefits.
Legal Authority: The Department's statutory authority to foster,
promote, and develop international commerce (15 U.S.C. 1512).
IV. Request for Comments
We are soliciting public comments to permit the Department/Bureau
to: (a) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper functions of the Department, including whether
the information will have practical utility; (b) Evaluate the accuracy
of our estimate of the time and cost burden for this proposed
collection, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions
used; (c) Evaluate ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of
the information to be collected; and (d) Minimize the reporting burden
on those who are to respond, including the use of automated collection
techniques or other forms of information technology.
Comments that you submit in response to this notice are a matter of
public record. We will include or summarize each comment in our request
to OMB to approve this information collection request (ICR). Before
including your address, phone number, email address, or other personal
identifying information in your comment, you should be aware that
[[Page 74983]]
your entire comment--including your personal identifying information--
may be made publicly available at any time. While you may ask us in
your comment to withhold your personal identifying information from
public review, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so.
Sheleen Dumas,
Department PRA Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Commerce Department.
[FR Doc. 2020-25974 Filed 11-23-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P