Certain Dental and Orthodontic Scanners and Software; Commission's Final Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337; Termination of the Investigation, 74760-74761 [2020-25791]
Download as PDF
74760
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
these reviews may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background.—On August 4, 2020, the
Commission determined that the
domestic interested party group
response to its notice of institution (85
FR 25475, May 1, 2020) of the subject
five-year reviews was adequate and that
the respondent interested party group
response was inadequate. The
Commission did not find any other
circumstances that would warrant
conducting full reviews.1 Accordingly,
the Commission determined that it
would conduct expedited reviews
pursuant to section 751(c)(3) of the
Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(3)).
For further information concerning
the conduct of these reviews and rules
of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part
207).
Please note the Secretary’s Office will
accept only electronic filings at this
time. Filings must be made through the
Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS, https://
edis.usitc.gov). No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any
electronic filings will be accepted until
further notice.
Staff report.—A staff report
containing information concerning the
subject matter of the reviews will be
placed in the nonpublic record on
November 17, 2020, and made available
to persons on the Administrative
Protective Order service list for these
reviews. A public version will be issued
thereafter, pursuant to section
207.62(d)(4) of the Commission’s rules.
Written submissions.—As provided in
section 207.62(d) of the Commission’s
rules, interested parties that are parties
to the reviews and that have provided
individually adequate responses to the
notice of institution,2 and any party
1 A record of the Commissioners’ votes is
available from the Office of the Secretary and at the
Commission’s website.
2 The Commission has found the joint response to
its notice of institution filed on behalf of domestic
producers of citric acid and certain citrate salts,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Nov 20, 2020
Jkt 253001
other than an interested party to the
reviews may file written comments with
the Secretary on what determination the
Commission should reach in the
reviews. Comments are due on or before
November 23, 2020 and may not contain
new factual information. Any person
that is neither a party to the five-year
reviews nor an interested party may
submit a brief written statement (which
shall not contain any new factual
information) pertinent to the reviews by
November 23, 2020. However, should
the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) extend the time limit for
its completion of the final results of its
reviews, the deadline for comments
(which may not contain new factual
information) on Commerce’s final
results is three business days after the
issuance of Commerce’s results. If
comments contain business proprietary
information (BPI), they must conform
with the requirements of sections 201.6,
207.3, and 207.7 of the Commission’s
rules. The Commission’s Handbook on
Filing Procedures, available on the
Commission’s website at https://
www.usitc.gov/documents/handbook_
on_filing_procedures.pdf, elaborates
upon the Commission’s procedures with
respect to filings.
In accordance with sections 201.16(c)
and 207.3 of the rules, each document
filed by a party to the reviews must be
served on all other parties to the reviews
(as identified by either the public or BPI
service list), and a certificate of service
must be timely filed. The Secretary will
not accept a document for filing without
a certificate of service.
Determination.—The Commission has
determined these reviews are
extraordinarily complicated and
therefore has determined to exercise its
authority to extend the review period by
up to 90 days pursuant to 19 U.S.C.
1675(c)(5)(B).
Authority: These reviews are being
conducted under authority of title VII of the
Tariff Act of 1930; this notice is published
pursuant to section 207.62 of the
Commission’s rules.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 18, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–25792 Filed 11–20–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
Archer Daniels Midland Company, Cargill,
Incorporated, and Tate & Lyle Ingredients Americas
LLC (collectively, ‘‘domestic interested parties’’), to
be individually adequate. Comments from other
interested parties will not be accepted (see 19 CFR
207.62(d)(2)).
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1144]
Certain Dental and Orthodontic
Scanners and Software; Commission’s
Final Determination Finding No
Violation of Section 337; Termination
of the Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that
the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found no violation of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended. The investigation is hereby
terminated.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202)
708–5468. Copies of non-confidential
documents filed in connection with this
investigation are or will be available for
inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the
Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E
Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205–2000. General
information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its
internet server (https://www.usitc.gov).
The public record for this investigation
may be viewed on the Commission’s
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://
edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired
persons are advised that information on
this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission instituted this investigation
on March 5, 2019. 84 FR 7933–34
(March 5, 2019) based on a complaint
filed on behalf of Align Technology, Inc.
of San Jose, California (‘‘Align’’). The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, or the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain dental and orthodontic scanners
and software by reason of infringement
of one or more claims of U.S. Patent
Nos. 9,299,192 (‘‘the ’192 patent’’);
7,077,647 (‘‘the ’647 patent’’); 7,156,661
(‘‘the ’661 patent’’); 9,848,958 (‘‘the ’958
patent’’); and 8,102,538 (‘‘the ’538
patent’’). Id. The complaint further
alleges that a domestic industry exists.
Id. The Commission’s notice of
investigation named as respondents
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices
3Shape A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark;
3Shape, Inc. of Warren, New Jersey; and
3Shape Trios A/S of Copenhagen,
Denmark (together, ‘‘3Shape’’). Id. The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations is
not participating in the investigation. Id.
The Commission subsequently
terminated the investigation with
respect to the ’958 patent based on
Align’s withdrawal of those complaint
allegations. Order No. 17 (Jul. 2, 2019),
not reviewed Notice (Jul. 23, 2019). On
October 8, 2019, Align stated that it
would no longer pursue a violation with
respect to claims 4 and 20 of the ’647
patent, claims 1 and 19 of the ’661
patent, and claims 1, 3–5, and 22 of the
’192 patent. On October 21, 2019, Align
stated that it would no longer pursue a
violation with respect to claim 2 of the
’647 patent. Accordingly, at the time of
the Final ID, Align asserted claims 1 and
18 of the ’647 patent, claims 2 and 20
of the ’661 patent, claims 1 and 2 of the
’538 patent, and claims 2, 28, and 29 of
the ’192 patent.
On April 30, 2020, the ALJ issued the
Final ID finding a violation of section
337 with respect to the ’647 and ’661
patents, and no violation with respect to
the ’538 and ’192 patents. Specifically,
the ALJ found that claims 1 and 18 of
the ’538 patent are not infringed and
that claims 2, 28, and 29 of the ’192
patent are invalid. The ALJ found that
Align satisfied the remaining
requirements for a violation with
respect to the ’538 and ’192 patents.
On May 12, 2020, 3Shape and Align
each filed a petition for review of the
Final ID. On May 20, 2020, the parties
responded to each other’s petitions. The
Commission also received four
comments on the public interest.
On January 31, 2020, the Commission
determined to review the Final ID in
part. Specifically, the Commission
determined to review the following
issues: (1) The findings regarding
importation and induced infringement;
(2) the construction of limitation 1.5/
18.5 of the ‘647 patent (‘‘individually
matching [match] each of the dental
objects in the subsequent digital model
with a dental object in the initial digital
model to determine corresponding
dental objects, the matching comprising
[including instructions to]’’) in the
asserted claims of the ’647 patent, and
the application of that construction
regarding infringement, invalidity, and
the technical prong of the domestic
industry; (3) the findings regarding
whether the asserted claims of the ’647
and ’661 patents are directed to
patentable subject matter; (4) the
construction of the limitation ‘‘wherein
the device is configured for maintaining
a spatial disposition with respect to the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:07 Nov 20, 2020
Jkt 253001
portion that is substantially fixed during
operation of the optical scanner and
imaging means’’ in the asserted claims
of the ’538 patent, and the application
of that construction regarding
infringement, invalidity, and the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement; (5) the findings regarding
whether Okamato anticipates the
asserted claims of the ’538 patent; (6)
the findings regarding whether PaleyKriveshko anticipates or renders
obvious the asserted claims of the ’192
patent; and (7) the findings regarding
the satisfaction of the economic prong of
the domestic industry requirement.
Having examined the record of this
investigation, including the Final ID, the
petitions, responses, and other
submissions from the parties, the
Commission has determined that Align
has failed to show a violation of section
337. Specifically, the Commission has
determined to: (1) Modify the Final ID’s
findings on importation; (2) reverse the
Final ID’s finding that Align showed
induced infringement for the ’647 and
’661 patents; (3) modify the Final ID’s
interpretation of the limitation ‘‘to
determine corresponding dental
objects’’ in the asserted claims of the
’647 patent, but find that the
modification does not affect the
application of the construction to
infringement, the domestic industry, or
invalidity; (4) take no position on the
Final ID’s finding that the asserted
claims of the ’647 and ’661 patents are
directed to patentable subject matter; (5)
modify the ALJ’s construction of
‘‘wherein the device is configured for
maintaining a spatial disposition with
respect to the portion that is
substantially fixed during operation of
the optical scanner and the imaging
means’’ of the asserted claims of the
’538 patent, and find that, under the
modified construction, Align
established infringement and the
technical prong of the domestic industry
requirement but that the asserted claims
are invalid; (6) reverse the Final ID’s
finding that the asserted claims of the
’538 patent are not anticipated by
Okamoto; (7) reverse the Final ID’s
finding that the asserted claims of the
’192 patent are not anticipated by PaleyKriveshko, and affirm the Final ID’s
finding that the asserted claims are
invalid as obvious under modified
reasoning; and (8) take no position on
whether Align satisfied the economic
prong of the domestic industry
requirement.
Accordingly, the Commission finds
no violation of section 337. Specifically,
the Commission finds that Align failed
to establish a violation with respect to
the asserted claims of the ’647 and ’661
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
74761
patents because Align failed to show
infringement; that Align failed to
establish a violation with respect to the
asserted claims of the ’538 patent
because Align failed to show
infringement and because the claims are
invalid; and that Align failed to
establish a violation with respect to the
asserted claims of the ’192 patent
because the claims are invalid. The
Commission’s determinations are
explained more fully in the
accompanying Opinion. All other
findings in the ID under review that are
consistent with the Commission’s
determinations are affirmed. The
investigation is hereby terminated.
The Commission vote for these
determinations took place on November
17, 2020.
The authority for the Commission’s
determination is contained in section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part
210 of the Commission’s Rules of
Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part
210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 17, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–25791 Filed 11–20–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Antitrust Division
Notice Pursuant to The National
Cooperative Research and Production
Act of 1993—The Open Group, L.L.C.
Notice is hereby given that, on
November 3, 2020, pursuant to Section
6(a) of the National Cooperative
Research and Production Act of 1993,
15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (‘‘the Act’’), The
Open Group, L.L.C. (‘‘TOG’’) has filed
written notifications simultaneously
with the Attorney General and the
Federal Trade Commission disclosing
changes in its membership. The
notifications were filed for the purpose
of extending the Act’s provisions
limiting the recovery of antitrust
plaintiffs to actual damages under
specified circumstances. Specifically,
3ES Innovation Inc., Calgary, CANADA;
Asesorı´as y Desarrollos Corporativos
S.A., San Jose´, COSTA RICA; Asia
eHealth Information Network, Kowloon,
PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA;
Atkins Limited, Epsom, UNITED
KINGDOM; Bridewell Consulting Ltd,
Reading, UNITED KINGDOM; Brunei
Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian
Berhad, Seria, BRUNEI; Chameleon
E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM
23NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 226 (Monday, November 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74760-74761]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25791]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1144]
Certain Dental and Orthodontic Scanners and Software;
Commission's Final Determination Finding No Violation of Section 337;
Termination of the Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade
Commission has found no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended. The investigation is hereby terminated.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert Needham, Office of the General
Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-5468. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are
or will be available for inspection during official business hours
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436,
telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission
may also be obtained by accessing its internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed
on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter
can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202)
205-1810.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation
on March 5, 2019. 84 FR 7933-34 (March 5, 2019) based on a complaint
filed on behalf of Align Technology, Inc. of San Jose, California
(``Align''). The complaint alleges violations of section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into
the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the
United States after importation of certain dental and orthodontic
scanners and software by reason of infringement of one or more claims
of U.S. Patent Nos. 9,299,192 (``the '192 patent''); 7,077,647 (``the
'647 patent''); 7,156,661 (``the '661 patent''); 9,848,958 (``the '958
patent''); and 8,102,538 (``the '538 patent''). Id. The complaint
further alleges that a domestic industry exists. Id. The Commission's
notice of investigation named as respondents
[[Page 74761]]
3Shape A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark; 3Shape, Inc. of Warren, New Jersey;
and 3Shape Trios A/S of Copenhagen, Denmark (together, ``3Shape''). Id.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations is not participating in the
investigation. Id.
The Commission subsequently terminated the investigation with
respect to the '958 patent based on Align's withdrawal of those
complaint allegations. Order No. 17 (Jul. 2, 2019), not reviewed Notice
(Jul. 23, 2019). On October 8, 2019, Align stated that it would no
longer pursue a violation with respect to claims 4 and 20 of the '647
patent, claims 1 and 19 of the '661 patent, and claims 1, 3-5, and 22
of the '192 patent. On October 21, 2019, Align stated that it would no
longer pursue a violation with respect to claim 2 of the '647 patent.
Accordingly, at the time of the Final ID, Align asserted claims 1 and
18 of the '647 patent, claims 2 and 20 of the '661 patent, claims 1 and
2 of the '538 patent, and claims 2, 28, and 29 of the '192 patent.
On April 30, 2020, the ALJ issued the Final ID finding a violation
of section 337 with respect to the '647 and '661 patents, and no
violation with respect to the '538 and '192 patents. Specifically, the
ALJ found that claims 1 and 18 of the '538 patent are not infringed and
that claims 2, 28, and 29 of the '192 patent are invalid. The ALJ found
that Align satisfied the remaining requirements for a violation with
respect to the '538 and '192 patents.
On May 12, 2020, 3Shape and Align each filed a petition for review
of the Final ID. On May 20, 2020, the parties responded to each other's
petitions. The Commission also received four comments on the public
interest.
On January 31, 2020, the Commission determined to review the Final
ID in part. Specifically, the Commission determined to review the
following issues: (1) The findings regarding importation and induced
infringement; (2) the construction of limitation 1.5/18.5 of the `647
patent (``individually matching [match] each of the dental objects in
the subsequent digital model with a dental object in the initial
digital model to determine corresponding dental objects, the matching
comprising [including instructions to]'') in the asserted claims of the
'647 patent, and the application of that construction regarding
infringement, invalidity, and the technical prong of the domestic
industry; (3) the findings regarding whether the asserted claims of the
'647 and '661 patents are directed to patentable subject matter; (4)
the construction of the limitation ``wherein the device is configured
for maintaining a spatial disposition with respect to the portion that
is substantially fixed during operation of the optical scanner and
imaging means'' in the asserted claims of the '538 patent, and the
application of that construction regarding infringement, invalidity,
and the technical prong of the domestic industry requirement; (5) the
findings regarding whether Okamato anticipates the asserted claims of
the '538 patent; (6) the findings regarding whether Paley-Kriveshko
anticipates or renders obvious the asserted claims of the '192 patent;
and (7) the findings regarding the satisfaction of the economic prong
of the domestic industry requirement.
Having examined the record of this investigation, including the
Final ID, the petitions, responses, and other submissions from the
parties, the Commission has determined that Align has failed to show a
violation of section 337. Specifically, the Commission has determined
to: (1) Modify the Final ID's findings on importation; (2) reverse the
Final ID's finding that Align showed induced infringement for the '647
and '661 patents; (3) modify the Final ID's interpretation of the
limitation ``to determine corresponding dental objects'' in the
asserted claims of the '647 patent, but find that the modification does
not affect the application of the construction to infringement, the
domestic industry, or invalidity; (4) take no position on the Final
ID's finding that the asserted claims of the '647 and '661 patents are
directed to patentable subject matter; (5) modify the ALJ's
construction of ``wherein the device is configured for maintaining a
spatial disposition with respect to the portion that is substantially
fixed during operation of the optical scanner and the imaging means''
of the asserted claims of the '538 patent, and find that, under the
modified construction, Align established infringement and the technical
prong of the domestic industry requirement but that the asserted claims
are invalid; (6) reverse the Final ID's finding that the asserted
claims of the '538 patent are not anticipated by Okamoto; (7) reverse
the Final ID's finding that the asserted claims of the '192 patent are
not anticipated by Paley-Kriveshko, and affirm the Final ID's finding
that the asserted claims are invalid as obvious under modified
reasoning; and (8) take no position on whether Align satisfied the
economic prong of the domestic industry requirement.
Accordingly, the Commission finds no violation of section 337.
Specifically, the Commission finds that Align failed to establish a
violation with respect to the asserted claims of the '647 and '661
patents because Align failed to show infringement; that Align failed to
establish a violation with respect to the asserted claims of the '538
patent because Align failed to show infringement and because the claims
are invalid; and that Align failed to establish a violation with
respect to the asserted claims of the '192 patent because the claims
are invalid. The Commission's determinations are explained more fully
in the accompanying Opinion. All other findings in the ID under review
that are consistent with the Commission's determinations are affirmed.
The investigation is hereby terminated.
The Commission vote for these determinations took place on November
17, 2020.
The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and
in part 210 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR
part 210).
By order of the Commission.
Issued: November 17, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-25791 Filed 11-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P