Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20 in Connection With Market Makers' Complex Orders, Quoting Obligations and Volume, 74772-74775 [2020-25729]

Download as PDF 74772 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices Additionally, the proposed nonsubstantive updates to Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 5.33 are not competitive in nature and, instead, are intended to correct an inadvertently used term and provide clarity and consistency within the Rules and, to the extent possible, with the corresponding rule language of its affiliated options exchange. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; B. impose any significant burden on competition; and C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 10 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 11 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2020–109. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CBOE–2020–109, and should be submitted on or before December 14, 2020. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.12 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–25731 Filed 11–20–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CBOE–2020–109 on the subject line. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–90437; File No. SR– CboeEDGX–2020–054] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20 in Connection With Market Makers’ Complex Orders, Quoting Obligations and Volume November 17, 2020. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 3, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) proposes to amend its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20 in connection with Market Makers’ complex orders, quoting obligations and volume. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 2 17 10 15 11 17 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Nov 20, 2020 12 17 Jkt 253001 PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00109 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to adopt new Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 21.20 which provides that complex strategies are included when determining whether a Market Maker exceeds the 25% volume threshold in its non-appointed classes pursuant to Rule 22.6(f).5 The Exchange also proposes to make clarifying, nonsubstantive updates to Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20. Rule 21.20 governs trading of complex orders on the Exchange and, currently, Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 specifically provides that Market Makers are not required to quote on the COB. Complex strategies are not subject to any quoting requirements that are applicable to Market Makers in the simple market for individual options series or classes. Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 also states that volume executed in complex strategies is not taken into consideration when determining whether Market Makers are meeting quoting obligations applicable to Market Makers in the simple market for individual options. The proposed rule change updates Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 in order to provide additional clarity and consistency with the rules that provide for a Market-Maker’s quoting requirements and obligations. Specifically, pursuant to Rule 22.6, a Market-Maker must satisfy quoting obligations in each of its appointed classes. As such, the proposed [sic] updates Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 to make it clear that a Market-Maker’s orders in complex strategies are not subject to a MarketMaker’s quoting requirements in its appointed classes nor are considered in determining whether a Market-Maker has satisfied its quoting obligations in its appointed classes. Also, the proposed rule change updates Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 as it inadvertently refers to volume executed rather than orders, as ‘‘quoting’’ obligations relate to the submission of quotes and orders rather than executed volume. More 5 As a result of the proposed Interpretation and Policy, the proposed rule change accordingly updates the subsequent Interpretation and Policy numbering. VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Nov 20, 2020 Jkt 253001 specifically, pursuant to Rule 22.6, a Market-Maker’s bids and offers entered in the simple market are considered in determining whether a Market-Maker satisfies its quoting obligations, therefore, the proposed rule change amends Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 to more appropriately reflect this. The proposed change also updates the language in Interpretation and Policy .01 to read in plain English. Current Rule 22.6(f) provides that a Market-Maker is considered an order entry firm (‘‘OEF’’) 6 under the Rules in all classes in which the Market-Maker has no appointment, and limits the total number of contracts a Market-Maker may execute in classes in which it has no appointment to 25% of the total number of all contracts the MarketMarker executes on the Exchange in any calendar quarter. The Exchange does not currently include executed complex order volume when determining whether a Market-Maker has exceeded this threshold. The Exchange’s affiliated options exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’) has a rule in place that is substantially the same as EDGX Rule 22.6(f); however, Cboe Options currently considers a Market Maker’s executed complex order volume as well as a Market Maker’s executed simple order volume in determining whether a Market-Maker has exceeded the 25% volume threshold in its non-appointed classes.7 In order to harmonize this practice across the affiliated options exchanges,8 the Exchange now proposes to change its current interpretation and adopt proposed Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 20.21 to provide that a Market-Maker’s orders for complex strategies executed in classes in which it has no appointment are included in the total number of all contracts the Market-Maker executes on the Exchange in any calendar quarter in determining whether the Market-Maker exceeds the 25% threshold pursuant to Rule 22.6(f). The Exchange notes that Rule 22.6(f) is designed to prevent a Market-Maker 6 See Rule 16.1., which defines an ‘‘Options Order Entry Firm’’ and ‘‘Order Entry Firm’’ or ‘‘OEF’’ as those Options Members representing as agent Customer Orders on EDGX Options and those nonMarket Maker Members conducting proprietary trading. 7 The Exchange notes too that Cboe Options intends to simultaneously submit a rule filing to codify its current practice in calculating its MarketMakers’ simple and complex volume in nonappointed classes in its corresponding Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20. 8 The Exchange’s affiliated options exchange, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (‘‘C2’’) intends to simultaneously submit a substantively identical rule filing to clarify that it will calculate its Market Makers’ simple and complex volume in nonappointed classes pursuant to Cboe Options’ current practice. PO 00000 Frm 00110 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74773 from executing volume in nonappointed option classes in an amount disproportionate to volume executed in its appointed option classes, potentially in derogation of the performance of its obligations and provision of liquidity in its appointed option classes. As such, the proposed rule change is consistent with and supports the purposed [sic] of Rule 22.6(f) by including complex orders in this calculation. Therefore, the proposed rule change considers a Market-Maker’s orders executed in complex strategies representative of a Market-Maker’s total volume on the Exchange. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.9 Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 10 requirements that the rules of an exchange be designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the Section 6(b)(5) 11 requirement that the rules of an exchange not be designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by providing that the Exchange considers a Market-Maker’s complex order volume when calculating the 25% threshold of volume in non-appointed classes pursuant to Rule 22.6(f) and thereby harmonizing the Exchange’s rules with that of the corresponding rules of its affiliated options exchanges.12 Specifically, Rule 22.6(f) is designed to prevent a Market-Maker from executing volume in non-appointed option classes in an amount disproportionate to 9 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 11 Id. 12 See supra notes 7 and 8. 10 15 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1 74774 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices volume executed in its appointed option classes, potentially in derogation of the performance of its obligations and provision of liquidity in its appointed option classes. As stated above, the Exchange believes that a Market-Maker’s orders executed in complex strategies are representative of a Market-Maker’s total volume on the Exchange. Thus, including such in its calculation of volume in non-appointed classes will help to ensure that Market-Makers perform their obligations and provide liquidity in appointed classes in an appropriate manner as compared to non-appointed classes, and is thereby consistent with and supports the purpose of Rule 22.6(f). The Exchange also believes that codifying that a Market-Maker’s complex order volume counts towards its Market-Maker’s total volume on the Exchange may mitigate any potential confusion regarding this calculation so that Market-Makers have more clarity regarding their obligations in appointed classes in an appropriate manner as compared to non-appointed classes. As such, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will contribute to the protection of investors and the public interest by adding transparency and clarity to the Exchange’s Rules by codifying its affiliated options exchange’s current interpretation of how to [sic] a MarketMaker’s executed volume on the Exchange is calculated. In addition, the Exchange believes the proposed changes to Interpretation and Policy .01 of Exchange Rule 21.20 will add clarity by revising the Rule to provide that orders entered in appointed classes, rather than volume executed, is considered in connection with determining whether a Market-Maker meets it quoting obligations pursuant to 22.6 in its appointed classes as well as updating the language to read in plain English. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange reiterates that the proposed rule change is intended to codify in new Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 21.20 that the Exchange will consider a Market-Maker’s complex strategy execution volume in calculating its volume per quarter pursuant to Rule 22.6(f) and harmonize this calculation with the manner in which the exchange’s affiliated options exchange, Cboe Options, currently calculates Market-Maker executed volume in nonappointed classes. The proposed rule VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Nov 20, 2020 Jkt 253001 change also corrects an inadvertent error in Interpretation and Policy .01 to 21.20 indicating that executed volume rather than entered orders are considered when determining compliance with a Market-Maker’s quoting obligations. Thus, the Exchange believes this proposed rule change will benefit Exchange participants by providing specific guidance and additional clarity within the Exchange Rules, as well as between the rules of the affiliated options exchanges. Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change regarding the applicability of Rule 22.6(f) to a Market-Maker’s executions in the COB does not impose any burden on intramarket competition because it applies to all Market-Makers in the same manner. The proposed rule change codifies its affiliated options exchange’s existing interpretation of such calculation in its corresponding rules. It does not modify any existing MarketMaker obligations. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change does not impose any burden on intermarket competition because it relates to an obligation regarding Market-Maker executed volume only on the Exchange. The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will relieve any burden on market participants because it serves to provide Market-Makers with rules that ensure that Market-Makers are performing their obligations in appointed options classes in an appropriate manner as compared to non-appointed classes. Ensuring that Market-Makers execute a certain amount of their volume in appointed classes will contribute to sufficient liquidity in those classes, which benefits the market and investors as a whole. Additionally, the proposed nonsubstantive updates to Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 are not competitive in nature and, instead, are intended to correct an inadvertently used term and provide clarity and consistency within the Rules. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the proposed rule change. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; PO 00000 Frm 00111 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 B. impose any significant burden on competition; and C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 13 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 14 thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– CboeEDGX–2020–054 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeEDGX–2020–054. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the 13 15 14 17 E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 23NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 226 / Monday, November 23, 2020 / Notices provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–CboeEDGX–2020–054, and should be submitted on or before December 14, 2020. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.15 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–25729 Filed 11–20–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–90439; File No. SR–C2– 2020–017] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 6.13 in Connection With MarketMakers’ Complex Orders, Quoting Obligations and Volume November 17, 2020. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on November 3, 2020, Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. 15 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:07 Nov 20, 2020 I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe C2 Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘C2’’) proposes to amend its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 6.13 in connection with Market-Makers’ complex orders, quoting obligations and volume. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/ options/regulation/rule_filings/ctwo/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to adopt new Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 6.13 which provides that complex strategies are included when determining whether a Market Maker exceeds the 25% volume threshold in its non-appointed classes pursuant to Rule 8.6(f).5 The Exchange also proposes to make clarifying, nonsubstantive updates to Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13. Rule 6.13 governs trading of complex orders on the Exchange and, currently, Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 specifically provides that MarketMakers are not required to quote on the COB. Complex strategies are not subject to any quoting requirements that apply to Market-Makers in the simple market. Interpretation and Policy [sic] to Rule 6.13 also states that the Exchange does not take into account Market-Makers’ volume executed in complex strategies when determining whether Market5 As a result of the proposed Interpretation and Policy, the proposed rule change accordingly updates the subsequent Interpretation and Policy numbering. Jkt 253001 PO 00000 Frm 00112 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 74775 Makers meet their quoting obligations in the simple market. The proposed rule change updates Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 in order to provide additional clarity and consistency with the rules that provide for a Market-Maker’s quoting requirements and obligations. Specifically, pursuant to Rule 8.6, a Market-Maker must satisfy quoting obligations in each of its appointed classes. As such, the proposed updates to Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 to [sic] make it clear that a MarketMaker’s orders in complex strategies are not subject to a Market-Maker’s quoting requirements in its appointed classes nor are considered in determining whether a Market-Maker has satisfied its quoting obligations in its appointed classes. Also, the proposed rule change also updates Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 as it inadvertently refers to volume executed rather than orders, as ‘‘quoting’’ obligations relate to the submission of quotes and orders rather than executed volume. More specifically, pursuant to Rule 8.6, a Market-Maker’s bids and offers entered in the simple market are considered in determining whether a Market-Maker satisfies its quoting obligations, therefore, the proposed rule change amends Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 to more appropriately reflect this. The proposed change also updates the language in Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 6.13 to read in plain English. Current Rule 8.6(f) provides that a Market-Maker is considered an order entry firm (‘‘OEF’’) 6 under the Rules in all classes in which the Market-Maker has no appointment, and limits the total number of contracts a Market-Maker may execute in classes in which it has no appointment to 25% of the total number of all contracts the MarketMarker executes on the Exchange in any calendar quarter. The Exchange does not currently include executed complex order volume when determining whether a Market-Maker has exceeded this threshold. The Exchange’s affiliated options exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (‘‘Cboe Options’’) has a rule in place that is substantially the same as C2 Rule 8.6(f); however, Cboe Options currently considers a Market Maker’s executed complex order volume as well as a Market Maker’s executed simple order volume in determining whether a Market-Maker has exceeded the 25% 6 See Rule 1.1., which defines an ‘‘Order Entry Firm’’ or ‘‘OEF’’ as a Trading Permit Holder that represents as agent customer orders on the Exchange or that is a non-Market-Maker conducting proprietary trading. E:\FR\FM\23NON1.SGM 23NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 226 (Monday, November 23, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 74772-74775]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-25729]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-90437; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2020-054]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice 
of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To 
Amend Its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20 in Connection With 
Market Makers' Complex Orders, Quoting Obligations and Volume

November 17, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on November 3, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or 
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the 
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Exchange filed the proposal pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the 
Act \3\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is 
publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change 
from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
    \3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
    \4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to 
amend its Interpretations and Policies to Rule 21.20 in connection with 
Market Makers' complex orders, quoting obligations and volume. The text 
of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5.
    The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the 
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at 
the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The

[[Page 74773]]

Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C 
below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to adopt new Interpretation and Policy .02 to 
Rule 21.20 which provides that complex strategies are included when 
determining whether a Market Maker exceeds the 25% volume threshold in 
its non-appointed classes pursuant to Rule 22.6(f).\5\ The Exchange 
also proposes to make clarifying, nonsubstantive updates to 
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ As a result of the proposed Interpretation and Policy, the 
proposed rule change accordingly updates the subsequent 
Interpretation and Policy numbering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 21.20 governs trading of complex orders on the Exchange and, 
currently, Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 specifically 
provides that Market Makers are not required to quote on the COB. 
Complex strategies are not subject to any quoting requirements that are 
applicable to Market Makers in the simple market for individual options 
series or classes. Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 also 
states that volume executed in complex strategies is not taken into 
consideration when determining whether Market Makers are meeting 
quoting obligations applicable to Market Makers in the simple market 
for individual options. The proposed rule change updates Interpretation 
and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 in order to provide additional clarity and 
consistency with the rules that provide for a Market-Maker's quoting 
requirements and obligations. Specifically, pursuant to Rule 22.6, a 
Market-Maker must satisfy quoting obligations in each of its appointed 
classes. As such, the proposed [sic] updates Interpretation and Policy 
.01 to Rule 21.20 to make it clear that a Market-Maker's orders in 
complex strategies are not subject to a Market-Maker's quoting 
requirements in its appointed classes nor are considered in determining 
whether a Market-Maker has satisfied its quoting obligations in its 
appointed classes. Also, the proposed rule change updates 
Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 as it inadvertently refers 
to volume executed rather than orders, as ``quoting'' obligations 
relate to the submission of quotes and orders rather than executed 
volume. More specifically, pursuant to Rule 22.6, a Market-Maker's bids 
and offers entered in the simple market are considered in determining 
whether a Market-Maker satisfies its quoting obligations, therefore, 
the proposed rule change amends Interpretation and Policy .01 to Rule 
21.20 to more appropriately reflect this. The proposed change also 
updates the language in Interpretation and Policy .01 to read in plain 
English.
    Current Rule 22.6(f) provides that a Market-Maker is considered an 
order entry firm (``OEF'') \6\ under the Rules in all classes in which 
the Market-Maker has no appointment, and limits the total number of 
contracts a Market-Maker may execute in classes in which it has no 
appointment to 25% of the total number of all contracts the Market-
Marker executes on the Exchange in any calendar quarter. The Exchange 
does not currently include executed complex order volume when 
determining whether a Market-Maker has exceeded this threshold. The 
Exchange's affiliated options exchange, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (``Cboe 
Options'') has a rule in place that is substantially the same as EDGX 
Rule 22.6(f); however, Cboe Options currently considers a Market 
Maker's executed complex order volume as well as a Market Maker's 
executed simple order volume in determining whether a Market-Maker has 
exceeded the 25% volume threshold in its non-appointed classes.\7\ In 
order to harmonize this practice across the affiliated options 
exchanges,\8\ the Exchange now proposes to change its current 
interpretation and adopt proposed Interpretation and Policy .02 to Rule 
20.21 to provide that a Market-Maker's orders for complex strategies 
executed in classes in which it has no appointment are included in the 
total number of all contracts the Market-Maker executes on the Exchange 
in any calendar quarter in determining whether the Market-Maker exceeds 
the 25% threshold pursuant to Rule 22.6(f). The Exchange notes that 
Rule 22.6(f) is designed to prevent a Market-Maker from executing 
volume in non-appointed option classes in an amount disproportionate to 
volume executed in its appointed option classes, potentially in 
derogation of the performance of its obligations and provision of 
liquidity in its appointed option classes. As such, the proposed rule 
change is consistent with and supports the purposed [sic] of Rule 
22.6(f) by including complex orders in this calculation. Therefore, the 
proposed rule change considers a Market-Maker's orders executed in 
complex strategies representative of a Market-Maker's total volume on 
the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Rule 16.1., which defines an ``Options Order Entry 
Firm'' and ``Order Entry Firm'' or ``OEF'' as those Options Members 
representing as agent Customer Orders on EDGX Options and those non-
Market Maker Members conducting proprietary trading.
    \7\ The Exchange notes too that Cboe Options intends to 
simultaneously submit a rule filing to codify its current practice 
in calculating its Market-Makers' simple and complex volume in non-
appointed classes in its corresponding Interpretations and Policies 
to Rule 21.20.
    \8\ The Exchange's affiliated options exchange, Cboe C2 
Exchange, Inc. (``C2'') intends to simultaneously submit a 
substantively identical rule filing to clarify that it will 
calculate its Market Makers' simple and complex volume in non-
appointed classes pursuant to Cboe Options' current practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with 
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and 
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular, 
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\9\ Specifically, the 
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \10\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to 
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation 
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing, 
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating 
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally, 
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the 
Section 6(b)(5) \11\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be 
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, 
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \10\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \11\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will 
remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open 
market and a national market system by providing that the Exchange 
considers a Market-Maker's complex order volume when calculating the 
25% threshold of volume in non-appointed classes pursuant to Rule 
22.6(f) and thereby harmonizing the Exchange's rules with that of the 
corresponding rules of its affiliated options exchanges.\12\ 
Specifically, Rule 22.6(f) is designed to prevent a Market-Maker from 
executing volume in non-appointed option classes in an amount 
disproportionate to

[[Page 74774]]

volume executed in its appointed option classes, potentially in 
derogation of the performance of its obligations and provision of 
liquidity in its appointed option classes. As stated above, the 
Exchange believes that a Market-Maker's orders executed in complex 
strategies are representative of a Market-Maker's total volume on the 
Exchange. Thus, including such in its calculation of volume in non-
appointed classes will help to ensure that Market-Makers perform their 
obligations and provide liquidity in appointed classes in an 
appropriate manner as compared to non-appointed classes, and is thereby 
consistent with and supports the purpose of Rule 22.6(f). The Exchange 
also believes that codifying that a Market-Maker's complex order volume 
counts towards its Market-Maker's total volume on the Exchange may 
mitigate any potential confusion regarding this calculation so that 
Market-Makers have more clarity regarding their obligations in 
appointed classes in an appropriate manner as compared to non-appointed 
classes. As such, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change will 
contribute to the protection of investors and the public interest by 
adding transparency and clarity to the Exchange's Rules by codifying 
its affiliated options exchange's current interpretation of how to 
[sic] a Market-Maker's executed volume on the Exchange is calculated. 
In addition, the Exchange believes the proposed changes to 
Interpretation and Policy .01 of Exchange Rule 21.20 will add clarity 
by revising the Rule to provide that orders entered in appointed 
classes, rather than volume executed, is considered in connection with 
determining whether a Market-Maker meets it quoting obligations 
pursuant to 22.6 in its appointed classes as well as updating the 
language to read in plain English.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See supra notes 7 and 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will 
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate 
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange reiterates that 
the proposed rule change is intended to codify in new Interpretation 
and Policy .02 to Rule 21.20 that the Exchange will consider a Market-
Maker's complex strategy execution volume in calculating its volume per 
quarter pursuant to Rule 22.6(f) and harmonize this calculation with 
the manner in which the exchange's affiliated options exchange, Cboe 
Options, currently calculates Market-Maker executed volume in non-
appointed classes. The proposed rule change also corrects an 
inadvertent error in Interpretation and Policy .01 to 21.20 indicating 
that executed volume rather than entered orders are considered when 
determining compliance with a Market-Maker's quoting obligations. Thus, 
the Exchange believes this proposed rule change will benefit Exchange 
participants by providing specific guidance and additional clarity 
within the Exchange Rules, as well as between the rules of the 
affiliated options exchanges.
    Additionally, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change 
regarding the applicability of Rule 22.6(f) to a Market-Maker's 
executions in the COB does not impose any burden on intramarket 
competition because it applies to all Market-Makers in the same manner. 
The proposed rule change codifies its affiliated options exchange's 
existing interpretation of such calculation in its corresponding rules. 
It does not modify any existing Market-Maker obligations. The Exchange 
believes that the proposed rule change does not impose any burden on 
intermarket competition because it relates to an obligation regarding 
Market-Maker executed volume only on the Exchange.
    The Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will relieve 
any burden on market participants because it serves to provide Market-
Makers with rules that ensure that Market-Makers are performing their 
obligations in appointed options classes in an appropriate manner as 
compared to non-appointed classes. Ensuring that Market-Makers execute 
a certain amount of their volume in appointed classes will contribute 
to sufficient liquidity in those classes, which benefits the market and 
investors as a whole.
    Additionally, the proposed nonsubstantive updates to Interpretation 
and Policy .01 to Rule 21.20 are not competitive in nature and, 
instead, are intended to correct an inadvertently used term and provide 
clarity and consistency within the Rules.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the 
proposed rule change.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not:
    A. Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public 
interest;
    B. impose any significant burden on competition; and
    C. become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was 
filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has 
become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \13\ and 
Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \14\ thereunder. At any time within 60 days of the 
filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may 
temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission 
that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, 
for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission will institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed 
rule change should be approved or disapproved.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
    \14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-054 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-054. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the

[[Page 74775]]

provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and 
printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, 
Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available 
for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All 
comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting 
comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal 
identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit 
only information that you wish to make available publicly. All 
submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-054, and 
should be submitted on or before December 14, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-25729 Filed 11-20-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.