Consolidated Glass & Mirror, LLC, Receipt of Petitions for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 71712-71713 [2020-24825]
Download as PDF
71712
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 10, 2020 / Notices
Frequency of Submission: On
occasion.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
2,405.
Total Estimated Annual Burden: 279
hours.
Total Estimated Annual Burden Hour
Dollar Cost Equivalent: $19,888.
Under 44 U.S.C. 3507(a) and 5 CFR
1320.5(b) and 1320.8(b)(3)(vi), FRA
informs all interested parties that a
respondent is not required to respond
to, conduct, or sponsor a collection of
information that does not display a
currently valid OMB control number.
Authority: 44 U.S.C. 3501–3520.
Brett A. Jortland,
Deputy Chief Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2020–24947 Filed 11–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2018–0109 and
NHTSA–2018–0074; Notice 1]
Consolidated Glass & Mirror, LLC,
Receipt of Petitions for Decision of
Inconsequential Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petitions.
AGENCY:
Consolidated Glass & Mirror,
LLC (CGM), a subsidiary of Guardian
Industries Corporation (Guardian), has
determined that certain laminated glass
parts do not fully comply with Federal
motor vehicle safety standard (FMVSS)
No. 205, Glazing Materials. Guardian
filed two noncompliance reports dated
April 15, 2020 and December 14, 2018
CGM petitioned NHTSA on May 23,
2018, and December 20, 2018, for a
decision that the subject
noncompliances are inconsequential as
they relate to motor vehicle safety. This
document announces receipt of CGM’s
petitions.
DATES: The closing date for comments
on the petition is December 10, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written data, views,
and arguments on this petition.
Comments must refer to the docket
number(s) and notice number cited in
the title of this notice and may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
• Mail: Send comments by mail
addressed to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Nov 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver comments
by hand to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590. The Docket
Section is open on weekdays from 10
a.m. to 5 p.m. except for Federal
Holidays.
• Electronically: Submit comments
electronically by logging onto the
Federal Docket Management System
(FDMS) website at https://
www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Comments may also be faxed to
(202) 493–2251.
Comments must be written in the
English language, and be no greater than
15 pages in length, although there is no
limit to the length of necessary
attachments to the comments. If
comments are submitted in hard copy
form, please ensure that two copies are
provided. If you wish to receive
confirmation that comments you have
submitted by mail were received, please
enclose a stamped, self-addressed
postcard with the comments. Note that
all comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
All comments and supporting
materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated
above will be filed in the docket and
will be considered. All comments and
supporting materials received after the
closing date will also be filed and will
be considered to the fullest extent
possible.
When the petition is granted or
denied, notice of the decision will also
be published in the Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at
the end of this notice.
All comments, background
documentation, and supporting
materials submitted to the docket may
be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may
also be viewed on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by following the
online instructions for accessing the
dockets. The docket ID numbers for
these petitions are shown in the heading
of this notice.
DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on
April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
CGM has determined that certain
laminated glass parts do not fully
PO 00000
Frm 00110
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
comply with paragraph S6 of FMVSS
No. 205, Glazing Materials (49 CFR
571.205). On May 23, 2018, Guardian
petitioned NHTSA for an
inconsequential safety decision (49
U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49
CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance) without initially filing
a noncompliance report (49 CFR part
573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports). Although
NHTSA could have properly rejected
this petition, it did not and prompted
Guardian to file the required
noncompliance report. Guardian finally
did so on April 15, 2020. Guardian filed
another noncompliance report dated
December 14, 2018 and subsequently
filed a second petition on December 20,
2018, for a decision that this second
noncompliance is inconsequential as
they relate to motor vehicle safety.
Because the two petitions address
similar issues, this document announces
the receipt of the two CGM’s petitions.
This notice of receipt of CGM’s
petitions is published under 49 U.S.C.
30118 and 30120 and does not represent
any Agency decision or other exercises
of judgment concerning the merits of the
petition.
II. Equipment Involved
Approximately 223 laminated
windshields manufactured on March 8,
2018, and shipped to IC Corp Tulsa Bus
Plant for installation into Navistar buses
are potentially involved.
Approximately 1,390 bus door
window panes, manufactured between
November 1, 2017 and March 29, 2018
are potentially involved. The window
panes were sold to Vapor Bus for use in
the fabrication of bus doors. Vapor Bus
subsequently shipped the bus doors to
Nova Bus for installation in their buses.
III. Noncompliance
CGM explained that the
noncompliance is that the markings on
the subject laminated glass panes do not
fully meet the requirements specified in
paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205.
Specifically, the laminated glass panes
shipped to IC Corp Tulsa Bus Plant were
marked AS–2, when they should have
been marked AS–1 and the bus window
panes sold to Nova Bus were marked
AS–S, when they should have been
marked AS–2.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205
includes the requirements relevant to
this petition. A manufacturer or
distributor who cuts a section of glazing
material, to which FMVSS No. 205
applies, for use in a motor vehicle or
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 218 / Tuesday, November 10, 2020 / Notices
camper, must mark that material in
accordance with section 7 of ANSI/SAE
Z26.1–1996.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
V. Summary of CGM’s Petitions
The following views and arguments
presented in this section, V. Summary
of CGM’s Petitions, are the views and
arguments provided by CGM. They have
not been evaluated by the Agency and
do not reflect the views of the Agency.
The petitioner described the subject
noncompliances and stated their belief
that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor
vehicle safety.
In support of their petitions, CGM
submitted the following reasoning:
1. The laminated glass parts are
affixed with the CGM trademark and the
correct DOT number and M number.
2. Although the laminated glass parts
are affixed with the misprinted AS
number, the glass construction from
which the laminated glass parts were
fabricated is in full compliance with the
technical requirements that 49 CFR
571.205 as it currently applies to
laminated glass for use in a motor
vehicle. In no way is the actual safety
aspect of the laminated glass
compromised by the misprinted AS
number.
3. Despite the misprinted AS number
being affixed to the laminated glass
parts described herein, the correct parts
were sold and shipped to Navistar and
Nova Bus for use as windscreens and
door windows.
4. CGM asserts that the
noncompliance reported herein could
not result in the wrong part being used
in an OEM application, given that the
part would be ordered by its unique part
number and not the ‘‘M number’’
(which corresponds to the glass
construction from which the part is
fabricated). The parts are also easily
traceable back to CGM via their unique
DOT number.
CGM concluded by expressing the
belief that the subject noncompliances
are inconsequential as they relate to
motor vehicle safety, and that their
petitions to be exempted from providing
notification of the noncompliance, as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a
remedy for the noncompliance, as
required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be
granted.
CGM’s complete petitions and all
supporting documents are available by
logging onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) website at:
https://www.regulations.gov and
following the online search instructions
to locate the docket numbers listed in
the title of this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Nov 09, 2020
Jkt 253001
NHTSA notes that the statutory
provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to
file petitions for a determination of
inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to
exempt manufacturers only from the
duties found in sections 30118 and
30120, respectively, to notify owners,
purchasers, and dealers of a defect or
noncompliance and to remedy the
defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any
decision on these petitions only applies
to the subject equipment that CGM no
longer controlled at the time it
determined that the noncompliances
existed. However, any decision on these
petitions does not relieve equipment
distributors and dealers of the
prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale,
or introduction or delivery for
introduction into interstate commerce of
the noncompliant equipment under
their control after CGM notified them
that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120:
delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and
501.8.
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–24825 Filed 11–9–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–59–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA–2017–0097; Notice 2]
General Motors, LLC, Denial of Petition
for Decision of Inconsequential
Noncompliance
National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration (NHTSA), U.S.
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Denial of petition.
AGENCY:
General Motors, LLC (GM),
has determined that the seat belt
assemblies in certain model year (MY)
2017–2018 Chevrolet Silverado heavy
duty and GMC Sierra heavy duty motor
vehicles do not fully comply with
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard
(FMVSS) No. 209, Seat Belt Assemblies.
GM filed a noncompliance report dated
September 14, 2017, and later amended
it on September 22, 2017. GM also
petitioned NHTSA on October 6, 2017,
for a decision that the subject
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety. This
document announces the denial of GM’s
petition.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Stephen Hench, Office of Chief Counsel,
telephone 202–366–2262, facsimile
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00111
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71713
202–366–3820, or Mr. Jack Chern, Office
of Vehicle Safety Compliance, NHTSA,
telephone 202–366–0661, facsimile
202–366–3081.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview:
GM has determined that the seat belt
assemblies in certain MY 2017–2018
Chevrolet Silverado heavy duty and
GMC Sierra heavy duty motor vehicles
do not fully comply with paragraphs
S4.4(b)(5) of FMVSS No. 209, Seat Belt
Assemblies (49 CFR 571.209). GM filed
a noncompliance report dated
September 14, 2017, and amended it on
September 22, 2017, pursuant to 49 CFR
part 573, Defect and Noncompliance
Responsibility and Reports. GM also
petitioned NHTSA on October 6, 2017,
for an exemption from the notification
and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C.
Chapter 301 on the basis that this
noncompliance is inconsequential as it
relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant
to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and
49 CFR part 556, Exemption for
Inconsequential Defect or
Noncompliance.
Notice of receipt of GM’s petition was
published, with a 30-day public
comment period, on January 10, 2018,
in the Federal Register (83 FR 1282). No
comments were received. To view the
petition and all supporting documents,
log onto the Federal Docket
Management System (FDMS) website at:
https://www.regulations.gov/. Then
follow the online search instructions to
locate docket number ‘‘NHTSA–2017–
0097.’’
II. Vehicles Involved
This petition concerns approximately
38,048 MY 2017–2018 Chevrolet
Silverado heavy duty and GMC Sierra
heavy duty (Gross Vehicle Weight
Rating (GVWR) of 9,300–13,400 lbs)
motor vehicles, manufactured between
July 18, 2016, and August 7, 2017. The
double cab versions of the subject
vehicles are not included in this
petition.
III. Noncompliance
GM explains the noncompliance as
seat belt assemblies that do not conform
to the upper-torso seat belt elongation
requirements specified in paragraph
S4.4(b)(5) of FMVSS No. 209.
Specifically, the seat belt assemblies
were built with load-limiting torsion
bars measuring 9.5 mm in diameter on
the driver side and 8.0 mm on the
passenger side, instead of 12 mm for
both sides as specified by GM.
E:\FR\FM\10NON1.SGM
10NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71712-71713]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
[Docket No. NHTSA-2018-0109 and NHTSA-2018-0074; Notice 1]
Consolidated Glass & Mirror, LLC, Receipt of Petitions for
Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance
AGENCY: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA),
Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Receipt of petitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Consolidated Glass & Mirror, LLC (CGM), a subsidiary of
Guardian Industries Corporation (Guardian), has determined that certain
laminated glass parts do not fully comply with Federal motor vehicle
safety standard (FMVSS) No. 205, Glazing Materials. Guardian filed two
noncompliance reports dated April 15, 2020 and December 14, 2018 CGM
petitioned NHTSA on May 23, 2018, and December 20, 2018, for a decision
that the subject noncompliances are inconsequential as they relate to
motor vehicle safety. This document announces receipt of CGM's
petitions.
DATES: The closing date for comments on the petition is December 10,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are invited to submit written data,
views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the
docket number(s) and notice number cited in the title of this notice
and may be submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail: Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590.
Hand Delivery: Deliver comments by hand to the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC
20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m.
except for Federal Holidays.
Electronically: Submit comments electronically by logging
onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at https://www.regulations.gov/. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language, and be no greater
than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of
necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in
hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish
to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were
received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the
comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change
to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information
provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of
business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the
docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials
received after the closing date will also be filed and will be
considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will
also be published in the Federal Register pursuant to the authority
indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials
submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and
times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov by following the online instructions for
accessing the dockets. The docket ID numbers for these petitions are
shown in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
CGM has determined that certain laminated glass parts do not fully
comply with paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205, Glazing Materials (49 CFR
571.205). On May 23, 2018, Guardian petitioned NHTSA for an
inconsequential safety decision (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49
CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance)
without initially filing a noncompliance report (49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports). Although NHTSA
could have properly rejected this petition, it did not and prompted
Guardian to file the required noncompliance report. Guardian finally
did so on April 15, 2020. Guardian filed another noncompliance report
dated December 14, 2018 and subsequently filed a second petition on
December 20, 2018, for a decision that this second noncompliance is
inconsequential as they relate to motor vehicle safety. Because the two
petitions address similar issues, this document announces the receipt
of the two CGM's petitions.
This notice of receipt of CGM's petitions is published under 49
U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or
other exercises of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Equipment Involved
Approximately 223 laminated windshields manufactured on March 8,
2018, and shipped to IC Corp Tulsa Bus Plant for installation into
Navistar buses are potentially involved.
Approximately 1,390 bus door window panes, manufactured between
November 1, 2017 and March 29, 2018 are potentially involved. The
window panes were sold to Vapor Bus for use in the fabrication of bus
doors. Vapor Bus subsequently shipped the bus doors to Nova Bus for
installation in their buses.
III. Noncompliance
CGM explained that the noncompliance is that the markings on the
subject laminated glass panes do not fully meet the requirements
specified in paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205. Specifically, the laminated
glass panes shipped to IC Corp Tulsa Bus Plant were marked AS-2, when
they should have been marked AS-1 and the bus window panes sold to Nova
Bus were marked AS-S, when they should have been marked AS-2.
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S6 of FMVSS No. 205 includes the requirements relevant to
this petition. A manufacturer or distributor who cuts a section of
glazing material, to which FMVSS No. 205 applies, for use in a motor
vehicle or
[[Page 71713]]
camper, must mark that material in accordance with section 7 of ANSI/
SAE Z26.1-1996.
V. Summary of CGM's Petitions
The following views and arguments presented in this section, V.
Summary of CGM's Petitions, are the views and arguments provided by
CGM. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the
views of the Agency. The petitioner described the subject
noncompliances and stated their belief that the noncompliance is
inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of their petitions, CGM submitted the following
reasoning:
1. The laminated glass parts are affixed with the CGM trademark and
the correct DOT number and M number.
2. Although the laminated glass parts are affixed with the
misprinted AS number, the glass construction from which the laminated
glass parts were fabricated is in full compliance with the technical
requirements that 49 CFR 571.205 as it currently applies to laminated
glass for use in a motor vehicle. In no way is the actual safety aspect
of the laminated glass compromised by the misprinted AS number.
3. Despite the misprinted AS number being affixed to the laminated
glass parts described herein, the correct parts were sold and shipped
to Navistar and Nova Bus for use as windscreens and door windows.
4. CGM asserts that the noncompliance reported herein could not
result in the wrong part being used in an OEM application, given that
the part would be ordered by its unique part number and not the ``M
number'' (which corresponds to the glass construction from which the
part is fabricated). The parts are also easily traceable back to CGM
via their unique DOT number.
CGM concluded by expressing the belief that the subject
noncompliances are inconsequential as they relate to motor vehicle
safety, and that their petitions to be exempted from providing
notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and
a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should
be granted.
CGM's complete petitions and all supporting documents are available
by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at:
https://www.regulations.gov and following the online search
instructions to locate the docket numbers listed in the title of this
notice.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and
30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a
determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers
only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively,
to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance
and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on
these petitions only applies to the subject equipment that CGM no
longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliances
existed. However, any decision on these petitions does not relieve
equipment distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale,
offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into
interstate commerce of the noncompliant equipment under their control
after CGM notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at
49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8.
Otto G. Matheke III,
Director, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-24825 Filed 11-9-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-59-P