Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the By-Laws of FINRA Regulation, Inc. To Align the Grounds for Member Removal From the NAC With an Existing Provision in the FINRA By-Laws, 71387-71390 [2020-24787]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices
updates to the RWD Plan would
improve the accuracy of the inventory of
OCC’s Recovery Tools and improve
OCC’s evaluation of scenarios which
may potentially prevent OCC from
providing its Critical Services as a
going-concern, as well as OCC’s plans
for recovery or orderly wind-down.
Further, the proposed changes to the
Plan would update and improve the
information that a resolution authority
may reasonably anticipate as necessary
for purposes of recovery and orderly
wind-down planning.24 In this regard,
OCC believes its proposed rule change
is consistent with Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(3)(ii).25
The proposed rule change is not
inconsistent with the existing rules of
OCC, including any other rules
proposed to be amended.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
(B) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Burden on Competition
Section 17A(b)(3)(I) of the Act 26
requires that the rules of a clearing
agency not impose any burden on
competition not necessary or
appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act. OCC does not
believe that the proposed rule change
would impact or impose any burden on
competition.27 The proposed rule
change would update OCC’s RWD Plan.
The proposed updates to the RWD Plan
are the result of OCC’s annual review
and update process; these proposed
changes would revise certain factual
representations, update certain
organizational discussion and make
changes to conform to OCC’s adopted
Capital Management Policy. None of the
proposed updates to the RWD Plan
would affect Clearing Members’ access
to OCC’s services or impose any direct
burdens on clearing members.
Accordingly, the proposed rule change
would not unfairly inhibit access to
OCC’s services or disadvantage or favor
any particular user in relationship to
another user.
For the foregoing reasons, OCC
believes that the proposed rule change
is in the public interest, would be
consistent with the requirements of the
Act applicable to clearing agencies, and
would not impact or impose a burden
on competition.
24 See
81 FR at 70810.
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(3)(ii).
26 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I).
27 15 U.S.C. 78q–1(b)(3)(I).
25 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
(C) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Proposed Rule
Change Received From Members,
Participants or Others
Written comments on the proposed
rule change were not and are not
intended to be solicited with respect to
the proposed rule change and none have
been received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the self-regulatory organization
consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
the proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
OCC–2020–013 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2020–013. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71387
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of OCC and on OCC’s website at
https://www.theocc.com/CompanyInformation/Documents-and-Archives/
By-Laws-and-Rules.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2020–013 and should
be submitted on or before November 30,
2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.28
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–24783 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–90324; File No. SR–FINRA–
2020–037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the
By-Laws of FINRA Regulation, Inc. To
Align the Grounds for Member
Removal From the NAC With an
Existing Provision in the FINRA ByLaws
November 3, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on October
22, 2020, the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’)
filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by FINRA. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
28 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
71388
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend the ByLaws of FINRA Regulation, Inc.
(‘‘FINRA Regulation’’), FINRA’s
regulatory subsidiary, to further align
the grounds for member removal from
the National Adjudicatory Council
(‘‘NAC’’) with an existing provision in
the FINRA By-Laws related to the
removal of a FINRA Governor from the
FINRA Board of Governors (‘‘FINRA
Board’’).3
Below is the text of the proposed rule
change. Proposed new language is
italicized.
*
*
*
*
*
BY–LAWS OF FINRA REGULATION,
INC.
*
*
*
*
*
ARTICLE V NATIONAL
ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL
*
*
*
*
*
Removal
Sec. 5.8 Any or all of the members of
the National Adjudicatory Council may
be removed from office at any time for
refusal, failure, neglect, or inability to
discharge the duties of such office, or
for any cause affecting the best interests
of the National Adjudicatory Council
the sufficiency of which the FINRA
Board shall be the sole judge, by
majority vote of the FINRA Board.
*
*
*
*
*
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
3 In 2008, the FINRA Regulation By-Laws were
amended to, among other things, designate the
FINRA Board as the body authorized to oversee the
NAC and empowered to remove NAC members for
refusal, failure, neglect, or inability to discharge
duties. See Securities Exchange Act Release No.
58909 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 68467 (November
18, 2008) (Order Approving File No. SR–FINRA–
2008–046). Under the FINRA By-Laws, members of
the FINRA Board can be removed under the same
grounds, plus an additional ground. See infra note
8.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
FINRA Regulation is the regulatory
subsidiary of FINRA and operates
according to the Plan of Allocation and
Delegation of Functions by FINRA to
Subsidiaries (the ‘‘Plan’’).4 The FINRA
Regulation By-Laws authorize the NAC
to function on behalf of the FINRA
Board in several capacities.5 For
example, the NAC presides over
disciplinary matters appealed to or
called for review by the NAC; acts on
applications in statutory
disqualification and membership
proceedings; exercises exemptive
authority; and acts in other proceedings
as set forth in the FINRA Rule 9000
Series (Code of Procedure). The FINRA
Board may also delegate other powers
and duties to the NAC as the FINRA
Board deems appropriate and in a
manner not inconsistent with the Plan.6
For most matters that the NAC
considers, the NAC prepares proposed
written decisions that become final
FINRA action if the FINRA Board does
not call them for review.
FINRA periodically reviews its and
FINRA Regulation’s By-Laws to ensure
adherence to effective governance
practices. The FINRA Regulation ByLaws currently permit the FINRA Board
to remove ‘‘any or all members’’ of the
NAC from office at any time for refusal,
failure, neglect, or inability to discharge
the duties of the office.7 By comparison,
the FINRA By-Laws include those
grounds for removal of a Governor from
the FINRA Board plus an additional
ground allowing for removal for any
cause affecting the best interests of
FINRA the sufficiency of which the
FINRA Board shall be the sole judge.8
The proposed rule change would amend
Article V, Section 5.8 of the FINRA
Regulation By-Laws to align the bases
for removal of a member of the NAC in
the FINRA Regulation By-Laws with
those of the FINRA By-Laws for removal
of a Governor. Specifically, the
proposed rule change would provide
that a NAC member could be removed
by a majority vote of the FINRA Board
for any cause affecting the best interests
4 See Plan, II. FINRA Regulation, Inc., https://
www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/corporateorganization/ii-finra-regulation-inc.
5 See Article V, Sec. 5.1 of the FINRA Regulation
By-Laws.
6 See supra note 5.
7 See Article V, Section 5.8 of the FINRA
Regulation By-Laws.
8 See Article VII, Section 1(b) of the FINRA ByLaws.
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of the NAC, the sufficiency of which the
FINRA Board shall be the sole judge.
FINRA notes that the voting threshold
for removal of a NAC member differs
from that of a Governor. The former
requires a majority vote of the FINRA
Board, while the latter requires a twothirds vote.9 The higher voting
threshold for removal of a Governor
reflects the historical standard that
existed at the National Association of
Securities Dealers (‘‘NASD’’) prior to its
2007 merger with the member
regulation, enforcement and arbitration
operations of the New York Stock
Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) that formed FINRA,
and provides an additional safeguard at
the FINRA Board level to ensure a
diverse, majority non-industry
composition, and fair representation of
the industry in governance matters.10
Given the NAC’s adjudicatory role,
the best interests of the NAC are more
targeted than the best interests of
FINRA. The best interests of the NAC
are reflected in conduct and attributes
that ensure that the NAC remains an
unbiased and competent adjudicatory
body that is free of conflicts of interest,
that its members conduct themselves
with integrity, and that its decisions are
rendered fairly and consistently with
the law and rules that govern FINRA
members and their associated persons.
In considering whether to remove a
NAC member for a cause affecting the
best interests of the NAC, the FINRA
Board may consider, among other
things, a NAC member’s adherence to
general standards concerning actual and
apparent adjudicator conflicts of interest
and bias,11 and to the NAC’s Conflict of
Interest and Bias Policy (‘‘Policy’’). The
Policy sets forth broad-based principles
of behavior that are expected from NAC
members.12 Removal of a NAC member
9 Both FINRA and FINRA Regulation are
corporations organized under Delaware law. The
Delaware General Corporation Law provides that, in
general, directors may be removed by a majority
vote of the shares then entitled to vote at an election
of directors. See Del. Code Ann. tit. 8, § 141(k).
While the standard for removal of NAC members is
not directly subject to the Delaware General
Corporation Law, FINRA has adopted a removal
threshold for NAC members that is consistent with
the removal threshold for directors under the
Delaware Corporation Law.
10 The FINRA Regulation By-Laws addressing the
composition of the NAC also provide for a diverse,
majority non-industry composition, and for the fair
representation of industry. See Article V, Section
5.2(a) of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws; See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78094 (June
17, 2016), 81 FR 40932, 40934–35 (June 23, 2016).
11 See, e.g., Article IV, Section 4.14(a) of the
FINRA Regulation By-Laws.
12 The principles outlined in the Policy are
Independence, Impartiality, Integrity,
Accountability and Transparency; and place upon
NAC adjudicators the responsibility for recognizing
and reporting actual and apparent conflicts of
interest and bias.
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
from office is a facts and circumstances
determination. The additional removal
authority provided in the proposed rule
change may, depending on the facts and
circumstances, overlap in part with the
FINRA Board’s existing authority to
remove a NAC member. However,
depending on the facts and
circumstances, it may also provide an
additional basis for removal for a cause
affecting the best interests of the NAC
that does not fall within the scope of the
FINRA Board’s current removal
authority.
In order to balance the NAC’s ability
to perform certain actions on behalf of
FINRA 13 with the FINRA Board’s
authority to review such actions,14
FINRA believes that it is reasonable and
appropriate to amend the FINRA
Regulation By-Laws to align the grounds
under which members of the NAC and
FINRA Board can be removed. In doing
so, the proposed rule change will
strengthen the FINRA Board’s oversight
of the NAC and benefit the appellate
portion of FINRA’s disciplinary process,
in which the NAC prepares the decision
that becomes FINRA’s final action in the
vast majority of cases.
If the Commission approves the
proposed rule change, the effective date
of the proposed rule change will be the
date of Commission approval.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,15 which
requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and Section 15A(b)(4) of
the Act, which requires, among other
things, that FINRA rules be designed to
assure a fair representation of FINRA’s
members in the administration of its
affairs.16 FINRA believes that the
proposed By-Laws change will
strengthen its governance practices by
aligning grounds for removal of NAC
members with those of the FINRA
Governors. The FINRA By-Law
provision that allows for the Board’s
direct ability to remove a Governor for
any cause affecting the best interests of
FINRA existed in the By-Laws of the
NASD prior to its 2007 merger with the
NYSE, and was also a part of the ByLaws that were previously found to
supra note 5.
Plan, I(B). FINRA, Inc., https://
www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/corporateorganization/i-finra-inc.
15 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
16 15 U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(4).
meet the statutory requirement when
the NASD merged with the member
regulation, enforcement and arbitration
operations of the NYSE to form
FINRA.17 FINRA also believes applying
the same standard to removal of NAC
members will support a fair and
impartial disciplinary process for
members and their associated persons.
FINRA further believes that the
proposed rule change will strengthen
investor protection and further the
public interest by bolstering the
integrity of the NAC and strengthening
existing FINRA Regulation By-Laws that
foster a framework in which NAC
members may perform their duties free
from bias or conflicts of interest. In
addition, FINRA believes that the
proposed rule change furthers FINRA’s
ability to assure a fair representation of
FINRA members on the NAC by
enhancing the FINRA Board’s ability to
remove NAC members for conduct that
might hamper the NAC’s adjudicatory
function.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. FINRA has
evaluated the potential for economic
impacts associated with the proposed
rule change and determined that no
material costs or benefits were likely to
arise. The proposed rule change would
not require member firms or other
persons appearing before the NAC to
incur any direct costs or change their
behaviors in any way. All potential
actions taken pursuant to the proposed
rule change would be taken by the
FINRA Board. Further, FINRA’s other
By-Law provisions remain unchanged,
so the proposed rule change will have
no material impact on fair process to
litigants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period (i)
13 See
14 See
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
17 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145
(July 26, 2007), 72 FR 42169 (August 1, 2007), as
amended by Securities Exchange Act Release No.
56145A (May 30, 2008), 73 FR 32377 (June 6, 2008)
(Order Approving File No. SR–NASD–2007–023).
PO 00000
Frm 00087
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
71389
as the Commission may designate up to
90 days of such date if it finds such
longer period to be appropriate and
publishes its reasons for so finding or
(ii) as to which the self-regulatory
organization consents, the Commission
will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2020–037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2020–037. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
71390
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 217 / Monday, November 9, 2020 / Notices
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2020–037 and should be submitted on
or before November 30, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.18
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–24787 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Data Collection Available for Public
Comments
60-Day notice and request for
comments.
ACTION:
The Small Business
Administration (SBA) intends to request
approval, from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for the
collection of information described
below. The Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) requires federal agencies to
publish a notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information before submission to OMB,
and to allow 60 days for public
comment in response to the notice. This
notice complies with that requirement.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments to, Kelly
Templeton Financial Analyst, Office of
Portfolio Management and Office of
Financial Program Operations, Small
Business Administration, 409 3rd Street,
6th Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kelly Templeton, Financial Analyst
Office of Portfolio Management and
Office of Financial Program Operations
Kelly.templeton@sba.gov Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst, 202–205–7030,
curtis.rich@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Lenders
requesting SBA to purchase the
guaranty portion of a loan are required
to supply the Agency with a certified
transcript of the loan account. This form
is uniform and convenient means for
lenders to report and certify loan
accounts to purchase by SBA. The
Agency uses the information to
determine date of loan default and
whether Lender disbursed and serviced
the loan according to Loan Guaranty
agreement.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
18 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:35 Nov 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
Solicitation of Public Comments
SBA is requesting comments on (a)
Whether the collection of information is
necessary for the agency to properly
perform its functions; (b) whether the
burden estimates are accurate; (c)
whether there are ways to minimize the
burden, including through the use of
automated techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) whether
there are ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information.
Summary of Information Collection
(1) Title: Lender’s Transcript of
Account.
Description of Respondents: SBA
Lenders.
Form Number: SBA Form 1149.
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
3,600.
Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden:
36,000.
primarily to make loans under section
7(a) of the Small Business Act. As sole
regulator of these institutions, SBA
requires them to submit audited
financial statements annually as well as
interim, quarterly financial statements
and other reports to facilitate the
Agency’s oversight of these lenders.
Solicitation of Public Comments
SBA is requesting comments on (a)
Whether the collection of information is
necessary for the agency to properly
perform its functions; (b) whether the
burden estimates are accurate; (c)
whether there are ways to minimize the
burden, including through the use of
automated techniques or other forms of
information technology; and (d) whether
there are ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information.
Data Collection Available for Public
Comments
Summary of Information Collection
Collection: 3245–0077.
Title of Collection: Reports to SBA
Provisions of 13 CFR 120.464.
Description of Respondents: Small
Business Lending Companies (SBLCs)
and Non-federally regulated lenders
(NFRLs).
Total Estimated Annual Responses:
594.
Total Estimated Annual Hour Burden:
7,110.
60-Day notice and request for
comments.
Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
Curtis Rich,
Management Analyst.
[FR Doc. 2020–24764 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
ACTION:
The Small Business
Administration (SBA) intends to request
approval, from the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for the
collection of information described
below. The Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA) requires federal agencies to
publish a notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information before submission to OMB,
and to allow 60 days for public
comment in response to the notice. This
notice complies with that requirement.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
January 8, 2021.
ADDRESSES: Send all comments to,
Susan Streich, Director, Office of Credit
Risk Management, Small Business
Administration, 409 3rd Street, 7th
Floor, Washington, DC 20416.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Streich, Director, Office of Credit
Risk Management 202–205–6641,
susan.streich@sba.gov or Curtis B. Rich,
Management Analyst, 202–205–7030,
curtis.rich@sba.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Small
Business Lending Companies (SBLCs)
and Non-federally regulated lenders
(NFRLs). NFRL’S are non-depository
lending institutions authorized by SBA
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00088
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[FR Doc. 2020–24770 Filed 11–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
[Public Notice 11246]
30-Day Notice of Proposed Information
Collection: Individual, Corporate or
Foundation, and Government Donor
Letter Applications
Notice of request for public
comment and submission to OMB of
proposed collection of information.
ACTION:
The Department of State has
submitted the information collection
described below to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
approval. In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, we
are requesting comments on this
collection from all interested
individuals and organizations. The
purpose of this Notice is to allow 30
days for public comment.
DATES: Submit comments up to
December 9, 2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be sent
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\09NON1.SGM
09NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 217 (Monday, November 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71387-71390]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24787]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-90324; File No. SR-FINRA-2020-037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the By-Laws of FINRA Regulation, Inc. To Align the Grounds for Member
Removal From the NAC With an Existing Provision in the FINRA By-Laws
November 3, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act'') \1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on October 22, 2020, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I,
II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
[[Page 71388]]
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend the By-Laws of FINRA Regulation, Inc.
(``FINRA Regulation''), FINRA's regulatory subsidiary, to further align
the grounds for member removal from the National Adjudicatory Council
(``NAC'') with an existing provision in the FINRA By-Laws related to
the removal of a FINRA Governor from the FINRA Board of Governors
(``FINRA Board'').\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ In 2008, the FINRA Regulation By-Laws were amended to, among
other things, designate the FINRA Board as the body authorized to
oversee the NAC and empowered to remove NAC members for refusal,
failure, neglect, or inability to discharge duties. See Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 58909 (November 6, 2008), 73 FR 68467
(November 18, 2008) (Order Approving File No. SR-FINRA-2008-046).
Under the FINRA By-Laws, members of the FINRA Board can be removed
under the same grounds, plus an additional ground. See infra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Below is the text of the proposed rule change. Proposed new
language is italicized.
* * * * *
BY-LAWS OF FINRA REGULATION, INC.
* * * * *
ARTICLE V NATIONAL ADJUDICATORY COUNCIL
* * * * *
Removal
Sec. 5.8 Any or all of the members of the National Adjudicatory
Council may be removed from office at any time for refusal, failure,
neglect, or inability to discharge the duties of such office, or for
any cause affecting the best interests of the National Adjudicatory
Council the sufficiency of which the FINRA Board shall be the sole
judge, by majority vote of the FINRA Board.
* * * * *
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
FINRA Regulation is the regulatory subsidiary of FINRA and operates
according to the Plan of Allocation and Delegation of Functions by
FINRA to Subsidiaries (the ``Plan'').\4\ The FINRA Regulation By-Laws
authorize the NAC to function on behalf of the FINRA Board in several
capacities.\5\ For example, the NAC presides over disciplinary matters
appealed to or called for review by the NAC; acts on applications in
statutory disqualification and membership proceedings; exercises
exemptive authority; and acts in other proceedings as set forth in the
FINRA Rule 9000 Series (Code of Procedure). The FINRA Board may also
delegate other powers and duties to the NAC as the FINRA Board deems
appropriate and in a manner not inconsistent with the Plan.\6\ For most
matters that the NAC considers, the NAC prepares proposed written
decisions that become final FINRA action if the FINRA Board does not
call them for review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Plan, II. FINRA Regulation, Inc., https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/corporate-organization/ii-finra-regulation-inc.
\5\ See Article V, Sec. 5.1 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws.
\6\ See supra note 5.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA periodically reviews its and FINRA Regulation's By-Laws to
ensure adherence to effective governance practices. The FINRA
Regulation By-Laws currently permit the FINRA Board to remove ``any or
all members'' of the NAC from office at any time for refusal, failure,
neglect, or inability to discharge the duties of the office.\7\ By
comparison, the FINRA By-Laws include those grounds for removal of a
Governor from the FINRA Board plus an additional ground allowing for
removal for any cause affecting the best interests of FINRA the
sufficiency of which the FINRA Board shall be the sole judge.\8\ The
proposed rule change would amend Article V, Section 5.8 of the FINRA
Regulation By-Laws to align the bases for removal of a member of the
NAC in the FINRA Regulation By-Laws with those of the FINRA By-Laws for
removal of a Governor. Specifically, the proposed rule change would
provide that a NAC member could be removed by a majority vote of the
FINRA Board for any cause affecting the best interests of the NAC, the
sufficiency of which the FINRA Board shall be the sole judge.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Article V, Section 5.8 of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws.
\8\ See Article VII, Section 1(b) of the FINRA By-Laws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA notes that the voting threshold for removal of a NAC member
differs from that of a Governor. The former requires a majority vote of
the FINRA Board, while the latter requires a two-thirds vote.\9\ The
higher voting threshold for removal of a Governor reflects the
historical standard that existed at the National Association of
Securities Dealers (``NASD'') prior to its 2007 merger with the member
regulation, enforcement and arbitration operations of the New York
Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') that formed FINRA, and provides an additional
safeguard at the FINRA Board level to ensure a diverse, majority non-
industry composition, and fair representation of the industry in
governance matters.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ Both FINRA and FINRA Regulation are corporations organized
under Delaware law. The Delaware General Corporation Law provides
that, in general, directors may be removed by a majority vote of the
shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors. See Del.
Code Ann. tit. 8, Sec. 141(k). While the standard for removal of
NAC members is not directly subject to the Delaware General
Corporation Law, FINRA has adopted a removal threshold for NAC
members that is consistent with the removal threshold for directors
under the Delaware Corporation Law.
\10\ The FINRA Regulation By-Laws addressing the composition of
the NAC also provide for a diverse, majority non-industry
composition, and for the fair representation of industry. See
Article V, Section 5.2(a) of the FINRA Regulation By-Laws; See also
Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78094 (June 17, 2016), 81 FR
40932, 40934-35 (June 23, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given the NAC's adjudicatory role, the best interests of the NAC
are more targeted than the best interests of FINRA. The best interests
of the NAC are reflected in conduct and attributes that ensure that the
NAC remains an unbiased and competent adjudicatory body that is free of
conflicts of interest, that its members conduct themselves with
integrity, and that its decisions are rendered fairly and consistently
with the law and rules that govern FINRA members and their associated
persons. In considering whether to remove a NAC member for a cause
affecting the best interests of the NAC, the FINRA Board may consider,
among other things, a NAC member's adherence to general standards
concerning actual and apparent adjudicator conflicts of interest and
bias,\11\ and to the NAC's Conflict of Interest and Bias Policy
(``Policy''). The Policy sets forth broad-based principles of behavior
that are expected from NAC members.\12\ Removal of a NAC member
[[Page 71389]]
from office is a facts and circumstances determination. The additional
removal authority provided in the proposed rule change may, depending
on the facts and circumstances, overlap in part with the FINRA Board's
existing authority to remove a NAC member. However, depending on the
facts and circumstances, it may also provide an additional basis for
removal for a cause affecting the best interests of the NAC that does
not fall within the scope of the FINRA Board's current removal
authority.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See, e.g., Article IV, Section 4.14(a) of the FINRA
Regulation By-Laws.
\12\ The principles outlined in the Policy are Independence,
Impartiality, Integrity, Accountability and Transparency; and place
upon NAC adjudicators the responsibility for recognizing and
reporting actual and apparent conflicts of interest and bias.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In order to balance the NAC's ability to perform certain actions on
behalf of FINRA \13\ with the FINRA Board's authority to review such
actions,\14\ FINRA believes that it is reasonable and appropriate to
amend the FINRA Regulation By-Laws to align the grounds under which
members of the NAC and FINRA Board can be removed. In doing so, the
proposed rule change will strengthen the FINRA Board's oversight of the
NAC and benefit the appellate portion of FINRA's disciplinary process,
in which the NAC prepares the decision that becomes FINRA's final
action in the vast majority of cases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See supra note 5.
\14\ See Plan, I(B). FINRA, Inc., https://www.finra.org/rules-guidance/rulebooks/corporate-organization/i-finra-inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If the Commission approves the proposed rule change, the effective
date of the proposed rule change will be the date of Commission
approval.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\15\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest; and Section 15A(b)(4) of the Act, which requires,
among other things, that FINRA rules be designed to assure a fair
representation of FINRA's members in the administration of its
affairs.\16\ FINRA believes that the proposed By-Laws change will
strengthen its governance practices by aligning grounds for removal of
NAC members with those of the FINRA Governors. The FINRA By-Law
provision that allows for the Board's direct ability to remove a
Governor for any cause affecting the best interests of FINRA existed in
the By-Laws of the NASD prior to its 2007 merger with the NYSE, and was
also a part of the By-Laws that were previously found to meet the
statutory requirement when the NASD merged with the member regulation,
enforcement and arbitration operations of the NYSE to form FINRA.\17\
FINRA also believes applying the same standard to removal of NAC
members will support a fair and impartial disciplinary process for
members and their associated persons. FINRA further believes that the
proposed rule change will strengthen investor protection and further
the public interest by bolstering the integrity of the NAC and
strengthening existing FINRA Regulation By-Laws that foster a framework
in which NAC members may perform their duties free from bias or
conflicts of interest. In addition, FINRA believes that the proposed
rule change furthers FINRA's ability to assure a fair representation of
FINRA members on the NAC by enhancing the FINRA Board's ability to
remove NAC members for conduct that might hamper the NAC's adjudicatory
function.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\16\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(4).
\17\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 56145 (July 26,
2007), 72 FR 42169 (August 1, 2007), as amended by Securities
Exchange Act Release No. 56145A (May 30, 2008), 73 FR 32377 (June 6,
2008) (Order Approving File No. SR-NASD-2007-023).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. FINRA has evaluated the
potential for economic impacts associated with the proposed rule change
and determined that no material costs or benefits were likely to arise.
The proposed rule change would not require member firms or other
persons appearing before the NAC to incur any direct costs or change
their behaviors in any way. All potential actions taken pursuant to the
proposed rule change would be taken by the FINRA Board. Further,
FINRA's other By-Law provisions remain unchanged, so the proposed rule
change will have no material impact on fair process to litigants.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may
designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to
be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission will:
(A) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
(B) institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2020-037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2020-037. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment
[[Page 71390]]
submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-
FINRA-2020-037 and should be submitted on or before November 30, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-24787 Filed 11-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P