Certain Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, Robots, and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation, 71096-71097 [2020-24637]

Download as PDF 71096 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices MI. The human remains were removed from Kodiak Island Borough, AK. This notice is published as part of the National Park Service’s administrative responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25 U.S.C. 3003(d)(3). The determinations in this notice are the sole responsibility of the museum, institution, or Federal agency that has control of the Native American human remains. The National Park Service is not responsible for the determinations in this notice. Consultation A detailed assessment of the human remains was made by Michigan State University professional staff in consultation with representatives of the Alutiiq Museum and Archaeological Repository, acting as agent for the Alutiiq Tribe of Old Harbor (previously listed as Native Village of Old Harbor and Village of Old Harbor); Kaguyak Village; Native Village of Afognak; Native Village of Akhiok; Native Village of Larsen Bay; Native Village of Ouzinkie; Native Village of Port Lions; Sun’aq Tribe of Kodiak (previously listed as Shoonaq’ Tribe of Kodiak); and the Tangirnaq Native Village (previously listed as Lesnoi Village (aka Woody Island)). The Native Village of Karluk was invited to consult but did not participate. Hereafter, the Tribes identified in this paragraph are referred to as ‘‘The Tribes.’’ History and Description of the Remains On an unknown date, human remains representing, at minimum, one individual were removed from an unknown location in Kodiak Island Borough, AK. On an unknown date, the human remains (catalog number 4) were transferred to Michigan State University. On October 4, 2017, they were found in Michigan State University’s Forensic Anthropology Laboratory. No known individual was identified. No associated funerary objects are present. Determinations Made by Michigan State University Officials of Michigan State University have determined that: • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(9), the human remains described in this notice represent the physical remains of one individual of Native American ancestry based on biological evidence. • Pursuant to 25 U.S.C. 3001(2), there is a relationship of shared group identity that can be reasonably traced between the Native American human remains and The Tribes, based on archeological and geographical evidence. VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 Additional Requestors and Disposition Lineal descendants or representatives of any Indian Tribe or Native Hawaiian organization not identified in this notice that wish to request transfer of control of these human remains should submit a written request with information in support of the request to Judith Stoddart, Associate Provost for University Collections and Arts Initiatives, Michigan State University, 466 W Circle Drive, East Lansing, MI 48824–1044, telephone (517) 432–2524, email stoddart@msu.edu, by December 7, 2020. After that date, if no additional requestors have come forward, transfer of control of the human remains to The Tribes may proceed. Michigan State University is responsible for notifying The Tribes that this notice has been published. Dated: October 22, 2020. Melanie O’Brien, Manager, National NAGPRA Program. [FR Doc. 2020–24685 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4312–52–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1228] Certain Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, Robots, and Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on October 1, 2020, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of AutoStore Technology AS of Norway; AutoStore AS of Norway; and AutoStore System Inc. of Derry, New Hampshire. A supplement to the complaint was filed on October 22, 2020. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations of section 337 based on the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain automated storage and retrieval systems, robots, and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,093,525 (‘‘the ’525 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,294,025 (‘‘the ’025 patent’’), U.S. Patent No. 10,474,140 (‘‘the ’140 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,494,239 (‘‘the ’239 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 10,696,478 (‘‘the ’478 patent’’). The complaint PO 00000 Frm 00050 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusive and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on November 2, 2020, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–6 of the ’525 patent; claims 1 and 18– 20 of the ’025 patent; claims 1–4 and 11–15 of the ’140 patent; claims 1, 2, and 5–15 of the ’239 patent; and claim 19 of the ’478 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 216 / Friday, November 6, 2020 / Notices investigation, is ‘‘robots, grid systems (including tracks on top to allow for the movement of the robots), storage bins, controllers, and components (including software)’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: AutoStore Technology AS, Stokkastrandvegen 85, 5578 Nedre Vats, Norway AutoStore AS, Stokkastrandvegen 85, 5578 Nedre Vats, Norway AutoStore System Inc., 3 Corporate Park Drive, Unit 1, Derry, NH 03038 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Ocado Group Plc, Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom Ocado Central Services Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom Ocado Innovation Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom Ocado Operating Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom Ocado Solutions, Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom Ocado Solutions USA Inc., 1600 Tysons Boulevard, 4th Floor, Tysons Corner, VA 22102 Tharsus Group Ltd., Coniston Rd, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 4RF, United Kingdom Printed Motor Works Ltd., Newman Lane, Alton, Hampshire GU34 2QW, United Kingdom (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be VerDate Sep<11>2014 19:00 Nov 05, 2020 Jkt 253001 considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: November 2, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–24637 Filed 11–5–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives [OMB Number 1140–0096] Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed eCollection eComments Requested; Extension Without Change of a Currently Approved Collection Environmental Information—ATF Form 5000.29 Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, Department of Justice. ACTION: 60-Day notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Department of Justice (DOJ), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF), will submit the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. DATES: Comments are encouraged and will be accepted for 60 days until January 5, 2021. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have additional comments, regarding the estimated public burden or associated response time, suggestions, or need a copy of the PO 00000 Frm 00051 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 71097 proposed information collection instrument with instructions, or additional information, please contact: Shawn Stevens, Acting Chief, Federal Explosives Licensing Center, either by mail at 244 Needy Road, Martinsburg, WV 25405, by email at Shawn.Stevens@ atf.gov, or by telephone at 304–616– 4400. Written comments and suggestions from the public and affected agencies concerning the proposed collection of information are encouraged. Your comments should address one or more of the following four points: —Evaluate whether the proposed collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information will have practical utility; —Evaluate the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information, including the validity of the methodology and assumptions used; —Evaluate whether and if so how the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected can be enhanced; and —Minimize the burden of the collection of information on those who are to respond, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic submission of responses. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Overview of This Information Collection 1. Type of Information Collection (check justification or form 83): Extension without change of a currently approved collection. 2. The Title of the Form/Collection: Environmental Information. 3. The agency form number, if any, and the applicable component of the Department sponsoring the collection: Form number (if applicable): ATF Form 5000.29. Component: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, U.S. Department of Justice. 4. Affected public who will be asked or required to respond, as well as a brief abstract: Primary: Business or other forprofit. Other (if applicable): None. Abstract: The National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C Chapter 55, authorizes the execution of Environmental Information—ATF Form 5000.29, during the explosives application process, to ensure compliance with the Act. ATF personnel reviews the collected E:\FR\FM\06NON1.SGM 06NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 216 (Friday, November 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71096-71097]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-24637]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1228]


Certain Automated Storage and Retrieval Systems, Robots, and 
Components Thereof; Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 1, 2020, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of AutoStore 
Technology AS of Norway; AutoStore AS of Norway; and AutoStore System 
Inc. of Derry, New Hampshire. A supplement to the complaint was filed 
on October 22, 2020. The complaint, as supplemented, alleges violations 
of section 337 based on the importation into the United States, the 
sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after 
importation of certain automated storage and retrieval systems, robots, 
and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of 
U.S. Patent No. 10,093,525 (``the '525 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 
10,294,025 (``the '025 patent''), U.S. Patent No. 10,474,140 (``the 
'140 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,494,239 (``the '239 patent''); and 
U.S. Patent No. 10,696,478 (``the '478 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the 
applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the 
Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, 
issue a limited exclusive and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket 
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on November 2, 2020, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1-6 of the '525 patent; claims 1 and 18-20 of the '025 patent; 
claims 1-4 and 11-15 of the '140 patent; claims 1, 2, and 5-15 of the 
'239 patent; and claim 19 of the '478 patent; and whether an industry 
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the

[[Page 71097]]

investigation, is ``robots, grid systems (including tracks on top to 
allow for the movement of the robots), storage bins, controllers, and 
components (including software)'';
    (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

AutoStore Technology AS, Stokkastrandvegen 85, 5578 Nedre Vats, Norway
AutoStore AS, Stokkastrandvegen 85, 5578 Nedre Vats, Norway
AutoStore System Inc., 3 Corporate Park Drive, Unit 1, Derry, NH 03038

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Ocado Group Plc, Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, 
Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom
Ocado Central Services Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, 
Mosquito Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom
Ocado Innovation Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito 
Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom
Ocado Operating Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito Way, 
Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom
Ocado Solutions, Ltd., Buildings One & Two, Trident Place, Mosquito 
Way, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, AL10 9UL, United Kingdom
Ocado Solutions USA Inc., 1600 Tysons Boulevard, 4th Floor, Tysons 
Corner, VA 22102
Tharsus Group Ltd., Coniston Rd, Blyth, Northumberland, NE24 4RF, 
United Kingdom
Printed Motor Works Ltd., Newman Lane, Alton, Hampshire GU34 2QW, 
United Kingdom

    (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations will not participate as a party in this investigation.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission 
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the 
complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. 
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the 
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor 
is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 2, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-24637 Filed 11-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.