Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution, 68368-68369 [2020-23786]

Download as PDF jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 68368 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 28, 2020 / Notices and claims 1–9 of the ’853 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘Wi-Fi networking products, routers, satellites, extenders, Wi-Fi systems, mesh networks, mesh systems, gateways, modems, access points, controllers, network management devices, storage systems, switches, bridges, wireless services modules, wireless subscriber units, base stations, adapters, other networking products, and their related software/ applications’’; (3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Q3 Networking LLC, 5570 FM 423, Suite 250–2026, Frisco, TX 75034 (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: CommScope Holding Company, Inc., 1100 CommScope Place SE, Hickory, NC 28602 CommScope, Inc., 1100 CommScope Place SE, Hickory, NC 28602 Arris US Holdings, Inc., 3871 Lakefield Drive, Suwanee, GA 30024 Ruckus Wireless, Inc., 350 West Java Drive, Sunnyvale, CA 94089 Hewlett Packard Enterprise Co., 3000 Hanover Street, Palo Alto, CA 94304 Aruba Networks, Inc., 3333 Scott Boulevard, Santa Clara, CA 95054 Netgear, Inc., 350 East Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134 (4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not be named as a party to this investigation. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Oct 27, 2020 Jkt 253001 complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 23, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–23854 Filed 10–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1225] Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on September 14, 2020, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Solas OLED Ltd. of Ireland. A supplement was filed on September 30, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain active matrix OLED display devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,139,007 (‘‘the ’007 patent’’), U.S. Patent No. 7,573,068 (‘‘the ’068 patent’’); and 7,868,880 (‘‘the ’880 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00084 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on October 21, 2020, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1–15 of the ’007 patent; claims 13–17 of the ’068 patent; and claims 2–40 of the ’880 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘smartwatches with active matrix OLED displays, laptops with active matrix OLED displays, televisions and monitors with active matrix OLED displays, and mobile phones and tablets with active matrix OLED displays’’; E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 209 / Wednesday, October 28, 2020 / Notices (3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(3) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(3), the presiding Administrative Law Judge shall hold an early evidentiary hearing, find facts, and issue an early decision, within 100 days of institution except for good cause shown, as to whether the complainant has satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. Notwithstanding any Commission Rules to the contrary, which are hereby waived, any such decision should be issued in the form of an initial determination (ID) under Commission Rule 210.42(a)(3), 19 CFR 210.42(a)(3). The ID will become the Commission’s final determination 30 days after the date of service of the ID unless the Commission determines to review the ID. Any such review will be conducted in accordance with Commission Rules 210.43, 210.44, and 210.45, 19 CFR 210.43, 210.44, and 210.45. The issuance of an early ID finding that the complainant does not satisfy the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement shall stay the investigation unless the Commission orders otherwise; any other decision shall not stay the investigation or delay the issuance of a final ID covering the other issues of the investigation; (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Solas OLED Ltd., Suite 23, The Hyde Building, Carrickmines, Dublin 18, Ireland (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Apple Inc., One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, CA 95014 Dell Technologies Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock, TX 78682 LG Electronics Inc., LG Twin Tower 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07336, South Korea LG Electronics USA, Inc., 1000 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632 LG Display America, Inc., 2540 North First St, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 95131 LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Twin Tower 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, 07336, South Korea Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, Chicago, IL 60654 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129 Samsung-Ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwonsi, Gyeonggi-do, 443–742, South Korea VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:29 Oct 27, 2020 Jkt 253001 Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park, NJ 07660 Samsung Display Co., Ltd., 1 SamsungRo, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, GyeonggiDo, 17113, South Korea Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127 (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: October 22, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–23786 Filed 10–27–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 68369 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Drug Enforcement Administration [Docket No. DEA–735] Bulk Manufacturer of Controlled Substances Application: Bulk Manufacturer of Marihuana: Contract Pharmacal Corp. Drug Enforcement Administration, Justice. ACTION: Notice of application. AGENCY: The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is providing notice of an application it has received from an entity applying to be registered to manufacture in bulk basic class(es) of controlled substances listed in schedule I. DEA intends to evaluate this and other pending applications according to proposed regulations that, if finalized, would govern the program of growing marihuana for scientific and medical research under DEA registration. DATES: Registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefor, may file written comments on or objections to the issuance of the proposed registration on or before December 28, 2020. ADDRESSES: Written comments should be sent to: Drug Enforcement Administration, Attention: DEA Federal Register Representative/DPW, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield, Virginia 22152. To ensure proper handling of comments, please reference Docket No—DEA–735 in all correspondence, including attachments. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Controlled Substances Act (CSA) prohibits the cultivation and distribution of marihuana except by persons who are registered under the CSA to do so for lawful purposes. In accordance with the purposes specified in 21 CFR 1301.33(a), DEA is providing notice that the entity identified below has applied for registration as a bulk manufacturer of schedule I controlled substances. In response, registered bulk manufacturers of the affected basic class(es), and applicants therefor, may file written comments on or objections of the requested registration, as provided in this notice. This notice does not constitute any evaluation or determination of the merits of the application submitted. The applicant plans to manufacture bulk active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for product development and distribution to DEA registered researchers. If the application for registration is granted, the registrant would not be authorized to conduct SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\28OCN1.SGM 28OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 209 (Wednesday, October 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 68368-68369]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-23786]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1225]


Certain Active Matrix OLED Display Devices and Components 
Thereof; Notice of Institution

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on September 14, 2020, under 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Solas 
OLED Ltd. of Ireland. A supplement was filed on September 30, 2020. The 
complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation 
into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within 
the United States after importation of certain active matrix OLED 
display devices and components thereof by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,139,007 (``the '007 patent''), U.S. 
Patent No. 7,573,068 (``the '068 patent''); and 7,868,880 (``the '880 
patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The 
complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation 
and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease 
and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is 
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on October 21, 2020, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1-15 of the '007 patent; claims 13-17 of the '068 patent; and 
claims 2-40 of the '880 patent, and whether an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``smartwatches with 
active matrix OLED displays, laptops with active matrix OLED displays, 
televisions and monitors with active matrix OLED displays, and mobile 
phones and tablets with active matrix OLED displays'';

[[Page 68369]]

    (3) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(3) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(3), the presiding 
Administrative Law Judge shall hold an early evidentiary hearing, find 
facts, and issue an early decision, within 100 days of institution 
except for good cause shown, as to whether the complainant has 
satisfied the economic prong of the domestic industry requirement. 
Notwithstanding any Commission Rules to the contrary, which are hereby 
waived, any such decision should be issued in the form of an initial 
determination (ID) under Commission Rule 210.42(a)(3), 19 CFR 
210.42(a)(3). The ID will become the Commission's final determination 
30 days after the date of service of the ID unless the Commission 
determines to review the ID. Any such review will be conducted in 
accordance with Commission Rules 210.43, 210.44, and 210.45, 19 CFR 
210.43, 210.44, and 210.45. The issuance of an early ID finding that 
the complainant does not satisfy the economic prong of the domestic 
industry requirement shall stay the investigation unless the Commission 
orders otherwise; any other decision shall not stay the investigation 
or delay the issuance of a final ID covering the other issues of the 
investigation;
    (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is:

Solas OLED Ltd., Suite 23, The Hyde Building, Carrickmines, Dublin 18, 
Ireland
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Apple Inc., One Apple Park Way, Cupertino, CA 95014
Dell Technologies Inc., One Dell Way, Round Rock, TX 78682
LG Electronics Inc., LG Twin Tower 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 
Seoul, 07336, South Korea
LG Electronics USA, Inc., 1000 Sylvan Ave., Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632
LG Display America, Inc., 2540 North First St, Suite 400, San Jose, CA 
95131
LG Display Co., Ltd., LG Twin Tower 128 Yeoui-daero, Yeongdeungpo-gu, 
Seoul, 07336, South Korea
Motorola Mobility LLC, 222 W Merchandise Mart Plaza, Suite 1800, 
Chicago, IL 60654
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., 129 Samsung-Ro, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, 
Gyeonggi-do, 443-742, South Korea
Samsung Electronics America, Inc., 85 Challenger Rd., Ridgefield Park, 
NJ 07660
Samsung Display Co., Ltd., 1 Samsung-Ro, Giheung-gu, Yongin-si, 
Gyeonggi-Do, 17113, South Korea
Sony Electronics Inc., 16535 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission 
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the 
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation. 
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the 
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor 
is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: October 22, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-23786 Filed 10-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.