Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017, 64122-64124 [2020-22433]

Download as PDF 64122 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Notices Rescission of the Administrative Review Because Commerce has finalized a new amendment revising the terms and conditions of the Agreement, the administrative review of the pre-existing Agreement for the October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018 POR is now moot. The review pertains to a version of the Agreement that no longer exists. Accordingly, we are hereby rescinding this review. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). United States Steel Corporation, Maverick Tube Corporation, Tenaris Bay City, Inc., IPSCO Tubulars Inc., Vallourec Star, L.P., and Welded Tube USA, Inc (the petitioners), filed a timely request for review, in accordance with section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213(b).2 Pursuant to this request and in accordance with section 751(a) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(c)(1)(i), we initiated an administrative review of 159 companies named by the petitioners in their request for review.3 On August 11, 2020, the petitioners timely withdrew their request for an administrative review with respect to all companies.4 Rescission of Review Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), the Secretary will rescind an administrative review, in whole or in part, if the party that requested the review withdraws the request within 90 days of the date of publication of the notice of initiation of the requested review. As noted above, the petitioners, the only party to file a request for review, withdrew this request by the 90-day deadline. Accordingly, we are rescinding, in its entirety, the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on oil country tubular goods from China covering the period May 1, 2019, through April 30, 2020. Dated: October 5, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–22432 Filed 10–8–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–943] Oil Country Tubular Goods From the People’s Republic of China: Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2019–2020 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is rescinding the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on oil country tubular goods from the People’s Republic of China (China) for the period May 1, 2019, through April 30, 2020, based on the timely withdrawal of the request for review. DATES: Applicable October 9, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Glenn T. Bass Jr., AD/CVD Operations, Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8338. Assessment Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of oil country tubular goods from China. Antidumping duties shall be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping duties required at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register. Background to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 25394 (May 1, 2020). 2 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China: Request for Administrative Review of Antidumping Duty Order,’’ dated May 29, 2020. 3 See Initiation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR 41540 (July 10, 2020). 4 See Letter from the petitioners, ‘‘Oil Country Tubular Goods from the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated August 11, 2020. AGENCY: On May 1, 2020, Commerce published in the Federal Register a notice of opportunity to request an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on oil country tubular goods from China for the period May 1, 2019, through April 30, 2020.1 On May 29, 2020, 1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Oct 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 Notification to Importers This notice serves as a reminder to importers of their responsibility under PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in Commerce’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Orders This notice also serves as a reminder to all parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213(d)(4). Dated: October 5, 2020. James Maeder, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations. [FR Doc. 2020–22434 Filed 10–8–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–580–884] Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd. (Hyundai Steel), a producer/exporter of certain hot-rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of Korea (Korea), received countervailable subsidies that are above de minimis. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017. DATES: Applicable October 9, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Notices Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0176. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on December 12, 2019.1 In addition, Commerce issued a post-preliminary determination related to an upstream subsidy allegation on electricity on March 11, 2020.2 On March 19, 2020, we postponed the final results of this review until June 9, 2020.3 On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by 50 days.4 On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 days, thereby extending the deadline for these final results until September 28, 2020.5 For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.6 Scope of the Order The products covered by this order are hot-rolled steel flat products. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in interested parties’ briefs are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by interested parties and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues 1 See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017, 84 FR 67927 (December 12, 2019) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum—Upstream Subsidy on Electricity,’’ dated March 11, 2020. 3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017,’’ dated March 19, 2020. 4 See Memorandum to the Record from Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24, 2020. 5 See Memorandum to the Record from Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews’’ dated July 21, 2020. All deadlines in this segment of the proceeding have been extended by an additional 60 days. 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic of Korea; 2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Oct 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance’s Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at https:// access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/ index.html. The signed and the electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Based on the comments received from interested parties and record information, we have made changes to the subsidy calculations for Hyundai Steel. For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Methodology Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from a government or public entity that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.7 For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum. In making these findings, Commerce relied, in part, on facts available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For further information, see ‘‘Use of Facts Otherwise Available’’ in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. Final Results of Administrative Review In accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), we determine the total estimated net countervailable subsidy rates for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 to be as follows: Company Subsidy rate (percent ad valorem) Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd ......... 0.51 64123 publication of this notice to parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Assessment Rate In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue appropriate assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days after publication of these final results. We will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by Hyundai Steel, entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, at the ad valorem rate listed above. Cash Deposit Requirements In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties, in the amount shown above, on shipments of subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. Notification to Interested Parties Disclosure Commerce will disclose the calculations performed for these final results within five days of the date of These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5). 7 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1 64124 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 197 / Friday, October 9, 2020 / Notices Dated: September 28, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. Appendix List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum I. Summary II. Background III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results IV. Scope of the Order V. Period of Review VI. Subsidies Valuation Information VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available VIII. Analysis of Programs IX. Discussion of Comments Comment 1: Whether the Electricity for Less Than Adequate Remuneration Upstream Subsidy Allegation Confers a Benefit Comment 2: Whether the Subsidy Rate for Industrial Technology Innovation Promotion Act Grants Was Improperly Calculated Comment 3: Whether the Tax Programs Under the Restriction of Special Location Taxation Act and Restriction of Special Taxation Act Meet the Specificity Requirement Comment 4: Whether the Trading of Demand Response Resources Program is Countervailable Comment 5: Whether the Modal Shift Program Confers a Countervailable Benefit Comment 6: Whether Commerce Correctly Measured the Benefit for Port Usage Rights at Incheon Harbor Comment 7: Whether the Suncheon Harbor Usage Fee Exemptions Under the Harbor Act Are Countervailable Comment 8: Whether Hyundai Green Power is Hyundai Steel’s Cross-Owned Input Supplier and Received Countervailable Benefits X. Recommendation [FR Doc. 2020–22433 Filed 10–8–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration [RTID 0648–XA472] Takes of Marine Mammals Incidental to Specified Activities; Taking Marine Mammals Incidental to Gastineau Channel Historical Society Sentinel Island Moorage Float Project, Juneau, Alaska National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce. ACTION: Notice; issuance of incidental harassment authorization. AGENCY: NMFS has received a request from the Gastineau Channel Historical SUMMARY: VerDate Sep<11>2014 17:26 Oct 08, 2020 Jkt 253001 Society (GCHS) for the re-issuance of a previously issued incidental harassment authorization (IHA) with the only change being effective dates. The initial IHA authorized take of seven species of marine mammals, by Level A and Level B harassment, incidental to construction associated with the Sentinel Island moorage float near Juneau, Alaska. The project has been delayed and none of the work covered in the initial IHA has been conducted. GCHS has requested reissuance with new effective dates over the same period in 2021 (i.e., July 15, 2021 through September 20, 2021). The scope of the activities and anticipated effects remain the same, authorized take numbers are not changed, and the required mitigation, monitoring, and reporting remains the same as included in the initial IHA. NMFS is, therefore, issuing a second identical IHA to cover the incidental take analyzed and authorized in the initial IHA. DATES: This authorization is effective from July 15, 2021 through September 20, 2021. ADDRESSES: An electronic copy of the final 2020 IHA previously issued to GCHS, the re-issued IHA, the original application, and the Federal Register notices proposing and issuing the initial IHA may be obtained by visiting https:// www.fisheries.noaa.gov/action/ incidental-take-authorization-sentinelisland-moorage-float-project-juneaualaska. In case of problems accessing these documents, please call the contact listed below (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT). FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dwayne Meadows, Ph.D., Office of Protected Resources, NMFS, (301) 7– 8401. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background Sections 101(a)(5)(A) and (D) of the Marine Mammal Protection Act (MMPA; 16 U.S.C. 1361 et seq.) direct the Secretary of Commerce (as delegated to NMFS) to allow, upon request, the incidental, but not intentional, taking of small numbers of marine mammals by U.S. citizens who engage in a specified activity (other than commercial fishing) within a specified geographical region if certain findings are made and either regulations are issued or, if the taking is limited to harassment, a notice of a proposed authorization is provided to the public for review. An authorization for incidental takings shall be granted if NMFS finds that the taking will have a negligible impact on the species or stock(s), will not have an unmitigable adverse impact on the availability of the species or PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 stock(s) for subsistence uses (where relevant), and if the permissible methods of taking and requirements pertaining to the mitigation, monitoring and reporting of such takings are set forth. NMFS has defined ‘‘negligible impact’’ in 50 CFR 216.103 as an impact resulting from the specified activity that cannot be reasonably expected to, and is not reasonably likely to, adversely affect the species or stock through effects on annual rates of recruitment or survival. The MMPA states that the term ‘‘take’’ means to harass, hunt, capture, kill or attempt to harass, hunt, capture, or kill any marine mammal. Except with respect to certain activities not pertinent here, the MMPA defines ‘‘harassment’’ as any act of pursuit, torment, or annoyance which (i) has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (Level A harassment); or (ii) has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including, but not limited to, migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering (Level B harassment). Summary of Request On July 15, 2020, NMFS published final notice of our issuance of an IHA authorizing take of marine mammals incidental to the Sentinel Island moorage float project (85 FR 42837). The effective dates of that IHA were July 15, 2020, through September 20, 2020. On September 14, 2020, GCHS informed NMFS that the project was delayed. None of the work identified in the initial IHA (e.g., pile driving) has occurred. GCHS submitted a request for a new identical IHA that would be effective from July 15, 2021 through September 20, 2021, in order to conduct the construction work that was analyzed and authorized through the previously issued IHA. Therefore, re-issuance of the IHA is appropriate. Summary of Specified Activity and Anticipated Impacts The planned activities (including mitigation, monitoring, and reporting), authorized incidental take, and anticipated impacts on the affected stocks are the same as those analyzed and authorized through the previously issued IHA. The purpose of GCHS’ construction project is to construct an access float to more easily access Sentinel Island. The location, timing, and nature of the activities, including the types of equipment planned for use, are identical those described in the initial IHA. The E:\FR\FM\09OCN1.SGM 09OCN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 197 (Friday, October 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64122-64124]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22433]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[C-580-884]


Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products From the Republic of 
Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
U.S. Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Hyundai 
Steel Co., Ltd. (Hyundai Steel), a producer/exporter of certain hot-
rolled steel flat products (hot-rolled steel) from the Republic of 
Korea (Korea), received countervailable subsidies that are above de 
minimis. The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2017 through December 
31, 2017.

DATES: Applicable October 9, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Emily Halle, AD/CVD Operations, Office 
V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. 
Department of Commerce, 1401

[[Page 64123]]

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
0176.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on 
December 12, 2019.\1\ In addition, Commerce issued a post-preliminary 
determination related to an upstream subsidy allegation on electricity 
on March 11, 2020.\2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the Republic 
of Korea: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Review, 2017, 84 FR 67927 (December 12, 2019) (Preliminary Results), 
and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
    \2\ See Memorandum, ``Post-Preliminary Analysis Memorandum--
Upstream Subsidy on Electricity,'' dated March 11, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On March 19, 2020, we postponed the final results of this review 
until June 9, 2020.\3\ On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines 
in administrative reviews by 50 days.\4\ On July 21, 2020, Commerce 
tolled all deadlines in administrative reviews by an additional 60 
days, thereby extending the deadline for these final results until 
September 28, 2020.\5\ For a complete description of the events that 
occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Memorandum, ``Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products 
from the Republic of Korea: Extension of Deadline for Final Results 
of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 2017,'' dated March 
19, 2020.
    \4\ See Memorandum to the Record from Jeffrey I. Kessler, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Tolling of 
Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews in Response to Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,'' 
dated April 24, 2020.
    \5\ See Memorandum to the Record from Jeffrey I. Kessler, 
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, ``Tolling of 
Deadlines for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Administrative 
Reviews'' dated July 21, 2020. All deadlines in this segment of the 
proceeding have been extended by an additional 60 days.
    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the 
Final Results of the Administrative Review of the Countervailing 
Duty Order on Certain Hot-Rolled Steel Flat Products from the 
Republic of Korea; 2017,'' dated concurrently with, and hereby 
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scope of the Order

    The products covered by this order are hot-rolled steel flat 
products. For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the 
Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in 
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. A list of the issues raised by 
interested parties and to which we responded in the Issues and Decision 
Memorandum is provided in the Appendix to this notice. The Issues and 
Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically 
via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 
Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 
registered users at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 
version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly 
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and the 
electronic versions of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical 
in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on the comments received from interested parties and record 
information, we have made changes to the subsidy calculations for 
Hyundai Steel. For a discussion of these issues, see the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

    Commerce is conducting this review in accordance with section 
751(a)(l)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each 
of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a 
subsidy, i.e., a financial contribution from a government or public 
entity that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the 
subsidy is specific.\7\ For a full description of the methodology 
underlying our conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding 
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding 
benefit; and section 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In making these findings, Commerce relied, in part, on facts 
available, pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of the Act. For further 
information, see ``Use of Facts Otherwise Available'' in the Issues and 
Decision Memorandum.

Final Results of Administrative Review

    In accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.221(b)(5), we determine the total estimated net countervailable 
subsidy rates for the period January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 
to be as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                           Subsidy rate
                        Company                            (percent ad
                                                             valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hyundai Steel Co., Ltd.................................            0.51
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    Commerce will disclose the calculations performed for these final 
results within five days of the date of publication of this notice to 
parties in this proceeding, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Assessment Rate

    In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue 
appropriate assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) 15 days after publication of these final results. We 
will instruct CBP to liquidate shipments of subject merchandise 
produced and/or exported by Hyundai Steel, entered or withdrawn from 
warehouse for consumption from January 1, 2017 through December 31, 
2017, at the ad valorem rate listed above.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, we intend to 
instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing 
duties, in the amount shown above, on shipments of subject merchandise 
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the 
date of publication of the final results of this review. For all non-
reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect cash deposits of estimated 
countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all others 
rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit 
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further 
notice.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to 
an administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 
continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.

Notification to Interested Parties

    These final results are issued and published in accordance with 
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).


[[Page 64124]]


    Dated: September 28, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

Appendix

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary
II. Background
III. Changes Since the Preliminary Results
IV. Scope of the Order
V. Period of Review
VI. Subsidies Valuation Information
VII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available
VIII. Analysis of Programs
IX. Discussion of Comments
    Comment 1: Whether the Electricity for Less Than Adequate 
Remuneration Upstream Subsidy Allegation Confers a Benefit
    Comment 2: Whether the Subsidy Rate for Industrial Technology 
Innovation Promotion Act Grants Was Improperly Calculated
    Comment 3: Whether the Tax Programs Under the Restriction of 
Special Location Taxation Act and Restriction of Special Taxation 
Act Meet the Specificity Requirement
    Comment 4: Whether the Trading of Demand Response Resources 
Program is Countervailable
    Comment 5: Whether the Modal Shift Program Confers a 
Countervailable Benefit
    Comment 6: Whether Commerce Correctly Measured the Benefit for 
Port Usage Rights at Incheon Harbor
    Comment 7: Whether the Suncheon Harbor Usage Fee Exemptions 
Under the Harbor Act Are Countervailable
    Comment 8: Whether Hyundai Green Power is Hyundai Steel's Cross-
Owned Input Supplier and Received Countervailable Benefits
X. Recommendation

[FR Doc. 2020-22433 Filed 10-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.