Horizon Funds and Horizon Investments, LLC, 63302-63305 [2020-22111]
Download as PDF
63302
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 7, 2020 / Notices
date, and the authority cited by the
Postal Service for each request. For each
request, the Commission appoints an
officer of the Commission to represent
the interests of the general public in the
proceeding, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505
(Public Representative). Section II also
establishes comment deadline(s)
pertaining to each request.
The public portions of the Postal
Service’s request(s) can be accessed via
the Commission’s website (https://
www.prc.gov). Non-public portions of
the Postal Service’s request(s), if any,
can be accessed through compliance
with the requirements of 39 CFR
3011.301.1
The Commission invites comments on
whether the Postal Service’s request(s)
in the captioned docket(s) are consistent
with the policies of title 39. For
request(s) that the Postal Service states
concern market dominant product(s),
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements include 39 U.S.C. 3622, 39
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3030, and 39
CFR part 3040, subpart B. For request(s)
that the Postal Service states concern
competitive product(s), applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements
include 39 U.S.C. 3632, 39 U.S.C. 3633,
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR part 3035, and
39 CFR part 3040, subpart B. Comment
deadline(s) for each request appear in
section II.
II. Docketed Proceeding(s)
1. Docket No(s).: CP2019–168; Filing
Title: USPS Notice of Amendment to
Priority Mail Contract 533, Filed Under
Seal; Filing Acceptance Date: October 1,
2020; Filing Authority: 39 CFR
3035.105; Public Representative:
Matthew R. Ashford; Comments Due:
October 9, 2020.
2. Docket No(s).: MC2021–1 and
CP2021–1; Filing Title: USPS Request to
Add Priority Mail & First-Class Package
Service Contract 170 to Competitive
Product List and Notice of Filing
Materials Under Seal; Filing Acceptance
Date: October 1, 2020; Filing Authority:
39 U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130
through 3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105;
Public Representative: Matthew R.
Ashford; Comments Due: October 9,
2020.
3. Docket No(s).: MC2021–2 and
CP2021–2; Filing Title: USPS Request to
Add First-Class Package Service
Contract 113 to Competitive Product
List and Notice of Filing Materials
Under Seal; Filing Acceptance Date:
October 1, 2020; Filing Authority: 39
1 See Docket No. RM2018–3, Order Adopting
Final Rules Relating to Non-Public Information,
June 27, 2018, Attachment A at 19–22 (Order No.
4679).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Oct 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
U.S.C. 3642, 39 CFR 3040.130 through
3040.135, and 39 CFR 3035.105; Public
Representative: Matthew R. Ashford;
Comments Due: October 9, 2020.
This Notice will be published in the
Federal Register.
Erica A. Barker,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–22152 Filed 10–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710–FW–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No.
34039; 812–15089]
Horizon Funds and Horizon
Investments, LLC
October 1, 2020.
Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice of an application under section
6(c) of the Investment Company Act of
1940 (‘‘Act’’) for an exemption from
section 15(a) of the Act, as well as from
certain disclosure requirements in rule
20a–1 under the Act, Item 19(a)(3) of
Form N–1A, Items 22(c)(1)(ii),
22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of
Schedule 14A under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘1934 Act’’), and
sections 6–07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of
Regulation S–X (‘‘Disclosure
Requirements’’).
APPLICANTS: Horizon Funds (the
‘‘Trust’’), a Delaware statutory trust
registered under the Act as an open-end
management investment company with
multiple series (each a ‘‘Fund’’) and
Horizon Investments, LLC (the ‘‘Initial
Adviser’’), a South Carolina limited
liability company registered as an
investment adviser under the
Investment Advisers Act of 1940
(‘‘Advisers Act’’) that serves an
investment adviser to the Funds
(collectively with the Trust, the
‘‘Applicants’’).
SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: The requested
exemption would permit Applicants to
enter into and materially amend
subadvisory agreements with
subadvisers without shareholder
approval and would grant relief from
the Disclosure Requirements as they
relate to fees paid to the subadvisers.
FILING DATES: The application was filed
on January 10, 2020, and amended on
July 6, 2020.
HEARING OR NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: An
order granting the requested relief will
be issued unless the Commission orders
a hearing. Interested persons may
PO 00000
Frm 00058
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
request a hearing by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov and serving applicants
with a copy of the request by email.
Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on
October 26, 2020, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the
applicants, in the form of an affidavit,
or, for lawyers, a certificate of service.
Pursuant to rule 0–5 under the Act,
hearing requests should state the nature
of the writer’s interest, any facts bearing
upon the desirability of a hearing on the
matter, the reason for the request, and
the issues contested. Persons who wish
to be notified of a hearing may request
notification by emailing the
Commission’s Secretary at SecretarysOffice@sec.gov.
ADDRESSES: The Commission:
Secretarys-Office@sec.gov. The Trust
and the Initial Adviser: 6210 Ardrey
Kell Road, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC
28277.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine Y. Greenlees, Senior Counsel,
at (202) 551–6879, or Daniele
Marchesani, Assistant Chief Counsel at
(202) 551–6821 (Division of Investment
Management, Chief Counsel’s Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
following is a summary of the
application. The complete application
may be obtained via the Commission’s
website by searching for the file number
or an Applicant using the ‘‘Company’’
name box, at https://www.sec.gov/
search/search.htm or by calling (202)
551–8090.
I. Requested Exemptive Relief
1. Applicants request an order to
permit the Adviser,1 subject to the
approval of the board of trustees of the
Trust (collectively, the ‘‘Board’’),2
including a majority of the trustees who
are not ‘‘interested persons’’ of the Trust
or the Adviser, as defined in section
2(a)(19) of the Act (the ‘‘Independent
Trustees’’), without obtaining
shareholder approval, to: (i) Select
investment sub-advisers (‘‘SubAdvisers’’) for all or a portion of the
assets of one or more of the Funds
pursuant to an investment sub-advisory
1 The term ‘‘Adviser’’ means (i) the Initial
Adviser, (ii) its successors, and (iii) any entity
controlling, controlled by or under common control
with, the Initial Adviser or its successors that serves
as the primary adviser to a Sub-Advised Fund (as
defined below). For the purposes of the requested
order, ‘‘successor’’ is limited to an entity that
results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business
organization.
2 The term ‘‘Board’’ also includes the board of
trustees or directors of a future Sub-Advised Fund
(as defined below), if different from the board of
trustees of the Trust.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 7, 2020 / Notices
agreement with each Sub-Adviser (each
a ‘‘Sub-Advisory Agreement’’); and (ii)
materially amend Sub-Advisory
Agreements with the Sub-Advisers.
2. Applicants also request an order
exempting the Sub-Advised Funds (as
defined below) from the Disclosure
Requirements, which require each Fund
to disclose fees paid to a Sub-Adviser.
Applicants seek relief to permit each
Sub-Advised Fund to disclose (as a
dollar amount and a percentage of the
Fund’s net assets): (i) The aggregate fees
paid to the Adviser and any WhollyOwned Sub-Advisers; and (ii) the
aggregate fees paid to Affiliated and
Non-Affiliated Sub-Advisers
(‘‘Aggregate Fee Disclosure’’).3
Applicants seek an exemption to permit
a Sub-Advised Fund to include only the
Aggregate Fee Disclosure.4
3. Applicants request that the relief
apply to Applicants, as well as to any
future Fund and any other existing or
future registered open-end management
investment company or series thereof
that intends to rely on the requested
order in the future and that: (i) Is
advised by the Adviser; (ii) uses the
multi-manager structure described in
the application; and (iii) complies with
the terms and conditions of the
application (each, a ‘‘Sub-Advised
Fund’’).5
II. Management of the Sub-Advised
Funds
4. The Adviser serves or will serve as
the investment adviser to each SubAdvised Fund pursuant to an
investment advisory agreement with the
Fund (each an ‘‘Investment Advisory
Agreement’’). Each Investment Advisory
Agreement has been or will be approved
by the Board, including a majority of the
3 A ‘‘Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser’’ is any
investment adviser that is (1) an indirect or direct
‘‘wholly-owned subsidiary’’ (as such term is
defined in section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act) of the
Adviser, (2) a ‘‘sister company’’ of the Adviser that
is an indirect or direct ‘‘wholly-owned subsidiary’’
of the same company that indirectly or directly
wholly owns the Adviser (the Adviser’s ‘‘parent
company’’), or (3) a parent company of the Adviser.
A ‘‘Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser’’ is any investment
adviser that is not an ‘‘affiliated person’’ (as defined
in the 1940 Act) of a Fund or the Adviser, except
to the extent that an affiliation arises solely because
the Sub-Adviser serves as a sub-adviser to one or
more Funds. Section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act
defines ‘‘wholly-owned subsidiary’’ of a person as
a company 95 per centum or more of the
outstanding voting securities of which are, directly
or indirectly, owned by such a person.
4 Applicants note that all other items required by
sections 6–07(2)(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation S–X
will be disclosed.
5 All registered open-end investment companies
that currently intend to rely on the requested order
are named as Applicants. Any entity that relies on
the requested order will do so only in accordance
with the terms and conditions contained in the
application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Oct 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
Independent Trustees, and by the
shareholders of the relevant SubAdvised Fund in the manner required
by sections 15(a) and 15(c) of the Act.
The terms of these Investment Advisory
Agreements comply or will comply with
section 15(a) of the Act. Applicants are
not seeking an exemption from the Act
with respect to the Investment Advisory
Agreements. Pursuant to the terms of
each Investment Advisory Agreement,
the Adviser, subject to the oversight of
the Board, will provide continuous
investment management for each SubAdvised Fund. For its services to each
Sub-Advised Fund, the Adviser receives
or will receive an investment advisory
fee from that Fund as specified in the
applicable Investment Advisory
Agreement.
5. Consistent with the terms of each
Investment Advisory Agreement, the
Adviser may, subject to the approval of
the Board, including a majority of the
Independent Trustees, and the
shareholders of the applicable SubAdvised Fund (if required by applicable
law), delegate portfolio management
responsibilities of all or a portion of the
assets of a Sub-Advised Fund to a SubAdviser. The Adviser will retain overall
responsibility for the management and
investment of the assets of each SubAdvised Fund. This responsibility
includes recommending the removal or
replacement of Sub-Advisers, allocating
the portion of that Sub-Advised Fund’s
assets to any given Sub-Adviser and
reallocating those assets as necessary
from time to time.6 The Sub-Advisers
will be ‘‘investment advisers’’ to the
Sub-Advised Funds within the meaning
of section 2(a)(20) of the Act and will
provide investment management
services to the Funds subject to, without
limitation, the requirements of sections
15(c) and 36(b) of the Act.7 The SubAdvisers, subject to the oversight of the
Adviser and the Board, will determine
the securities and other investments to
be purchased, sold or entered into by a
Sub-Advised Fund’s portfolio or a
portion thereof, and will place orders
with brokers or dealers that they select.8
6 Applicants represent that if the name of any
Sub-Advised Fund contains the name of a subadviser, the name of the Adviser that serves as the
primary adviser to the Fund, or a trademark or trade
name that is owned by or publicly used to identify
the Adviser, will precede the name of the subadviser.
7 The Sub-Advisers will be registered with the
Commission as an investment adviser under the
Advisers Act or not subject to such registration.
8 A ‘‘Sub-Adviser’’ also includes an investment
sub-adviser that provides or will provide the
Adviser with a model portfolio reflecting a specific
strategy, style or focus with respect to the
investment of all or a portion of a Sub-Advised
Fund’s assets. The Adviser may use the model
portfolio to determine the securities and other
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63303
6. The Sub-Advisory Agreements will
be approved by the Board, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees, in
accordance with sections 15(a) and 15(c)
of the Act. In addition, the terms of each
Sub-Advisory Agreement will comply
fully with the requirements of section
15(a) of the Act. The Adviser may
compensate the Sub-Advisers or the
Sub-Advised Funds may compensate
the Sub-Advisers directly.
7. Sub-Advised Funds will inform
shareholders of the hiring of a new SubAdviser pursuant to the following
procedures (‘‘Modified Notice and
Access Procedures’’): (a) Within 90 days
after a new Sub-Adviser is hired for any
Sub-Advised Fund, that Fund will send
its shareholders either a Multi-manager
Notice or a Multi-manager Notice and
Multi-manager Information Statement; 9
and (b) the Sub-Advised Fund will
make the Multi-manager Information
Statement available on the website
identified in the Multi-manager Notice
no later than when the Multi-manager
Notice (or Multi-manager Notice and
Multi-manager Information Statement)
is first sent to shareholders, and will
maintain it on that website for at least
90 days.10
III. Applicable Law
8. Section 15(a) of the Act states, in
part, that it is unlawful for any person
to act as an investment adviser to a
registered investment company ‘‘except
pursuant to a written contract, which
contract, whether with such registered
instruments to be purchased, sold or entered into
by a Sub-Advised Fund’s portfolio or a portion
thereof, and place orders with brokers or dealers
that it selects.
9 A ‘‘Multi-manager Notice’’ will be modeled on
a Notice of internet Availability as defined in Rule
14a–16 under the 1934 Act, and specifically will,
among other things: (a) Summarize the relevant
information regarding the new Sub-Adviser (except
as modified to permit Aggregate Fee Disclosure); (b)
inform shareholders that the Multi-manager
Information Statement is available on a website; (c)
provide the website address; (d) state the time
period during which the Multi-manager Information
Statement will remain available on that website; (e)
provide instructions for accessing and printing the
Multi-manager Information Statement; and (f)
instruct the shareholder that a paper or email copy
of the Multi-manager Information Statement may be
obtained, without charge, by contacting the SubAdvised Fund. A ‘‘Multi-manager Information
Statement’’ will meet the requirements of
Regulation 14C, Schedule 14C and Item 22 of
Schedule 14A under the 1934 Act for an
information statement, except as modified by the
requested order to permit Aggregate Fee Disclosure.
Multi-manager Information Statements will be filed
with the Commission via the EDGAR system.
10 In addition, Applicants represent that
whenever a Sub-Adviser is hired or terminated, or
a Sub-Advisory Agreement is materially amended,
the Sub-Advised Fund’s prospectus and statement
of additional information will be supplemented
promptly pursuant to rule 497(e) under the
Securities Act of 1933.
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
63304
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 7, 2020 / Notices
company or with an investment adviser
of such registered company, has been
approved by the vote of a majority of the
outstanding voting securities of such
registered company.’’
9. Form N–1A is the registration
statement used by open-end investment
companies. Item 19(a)(3) of Form N–1A
requires a registered investment
company to disclose in its statement of
additional information the method of
computing the ‘‘advisory fee payable’’
by the investment company with respect
to each investment adviser, including
the total dollar amounts that the
investment company ‘‘paid to the
adviser (aggregated with amounts paid
to affiliated advisers, if any), and any
advisers who are not affiliated persons
of the adviser, under the investment
advisory contract for the last three fiscal
years.’’
10. Rule 20a–1 under the Act requires
proxies solicited with respect to a
registered investment company to
comply with Schedule 14A under the
1934 Act. Items 22(c)(1)(ii), 22(c)(1)(iii),
22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of Schedule 14A,
taken together, require a proxy
statement for a shareholder meeting at
which the advisory contract will be
voted upon to include the ‘‘rate of
compensation of the investment
adviser,’’ the ‘‘aggregate amount of the
investment adviser’s fee,’’ a description
of the ‘‘terms of the contract to be acted
upon,’’ and, if a change in the advisory
fee is proposed, the existing and
proposed fees and the difference
between the two fees.
11. Regulation S–X sets forth the
requirements for financial statements
required to be included as part of a
registered investment company’s
registration statement and shareholder
reports filed with the Commission.
Sections 6–07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of
Regulation S–X require a registered
investment company to include in its
financial statements information about
investment advisory fees.
12. Section 6(c) of the Act provides
that the Commission may exempt any
person, security, or transaction or any
class or classes of persons, securities, or
transactions from any provisions of the
Act, or any rule thereunder, if such
exemption is necessary or appropriate
in the public interest and consistent
with the protection of investors and the
purposes fairly intended by the policy
and provisions of the Act. Applicants
state that the requested relief meets this
standard for the reasons discussed
below.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Oct 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
IV. Arguments in Support of the
Requested Relief
13. Applicants assert that, from the
perspective of the shareholder, the role
of the Sub-Advisers is substantially
equivalent to the limited role of the
individual portfolio managers employed
by an investment adviser to a traditional
investment company. Applicants also
assert that the shareholders expect the
Adviser, subject to review and approval
of the Board, to select a Sub-Adviser
who is in the best position to achieve
the Sub-Advised Fund’s investment
objective. Applicants believe that
permitting the Adviser to perform the
duties for which the shareholders of the
Sub-Advised Fund are paying the
Adviser—the selection, oversight and
evaluation of the Sub-Adviser—without
incurring unnecessary delays or
expenses of convening special meetings
of shareholders is appropriate and in the
interest of the Fund’s shareholders, and
will allow such Fund to operate more
efficiently. Applicants state that each
Investment Advisory Agreement will
continue to be fully subject to section
15(a) of the Act and approved by the
relevant Board, including a majority of
the Independent Trustees, in the
manner required by section 15(a) and
15(c) of the Act.
14. Applicants submit that the
requested relief meets the standards for
relief under section 6(c) of the Act.
Applicants state that the operation of
the Sub-Advised Fund in the manner
described in the Application must be
approved by shareholders of that Fund
before it may rely on the requested
relief. Applicants also state that the
proposed conditions to the requested
relief are designed to address any
potential conflicts of interest or
economic incentives, and provide that
shareholders are informed when new
Sub-Advisers are hired.
15. Applicants contend that, in the
circumstances described in the
application, a proxy solicitation to
approve the appointment of new SubAdvisers provides no more meaningful
information to shareholders than the
proposed Multi-manager Information
Statement. Applicants state that,
accordingly, they believe the requested
relief is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, and consistent with the
protection of investors and the purposes
fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
16. With respect to the relief
permitting Aggregate Fee Disclosure,
Applicants assert that disclosure of the
individual fees paid to the Sub-Advisers
does not serve any meaningful purpose.
Applicants contend that the primary
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reasons for requiring disclosure of
individual fees paid to Sub-Advisers are
to inform shareholders of expenses to be
charged by a particular Sub-Advised
Fund and to enable shareholders to
compare the fees to those of other
comparable investment companies.
Applicants believe that the requested
relief satisfies these objectives because
the Sub-Advised Fund’s overall
advisory fee will be fully disclosed and,
therefore, shareholders will know what
the Sub-Advised Fund’s fees and
expenses are and will be able to
compare the advisory fees a SubAdvised Fund is charged to those of
other investment companies. In
addition, Applicants assert that the
requested relief would benefit
shareholders of the Sub-Advised Fund
because it would improve the Adviser’s
ability to negotiate the fees paid to SubAdvisers. In particular, Applicants state
that if the Adviser is not required to
disclose the Sub-Advisers’ fees to the
public, the Adviser may be able to
negotiate rates that are below a SubAdviser’s ‘‘posted’’ amounts. Applicants
assert that the relief will also encourage
Sub-Advisers to negotiate lower subadvisory fees with the Adviser if the
lower fees are not required to be made
public.
V. Relief for Affiliated Sub-Advisers
17. The Commission has granted the
requested relief with respect to WhollyOwned and Non-Affiliated SubAdvisers through numerous exemptive
orders. The Commission also has
extended the requested relief to
Affiliated Sub-Advisers.11 Applicants
state that although the Adviser’s
judgment in recommending a SubAdviser can be affected by certain
conflicts, they do not warrant denying
the extension of the requested relief to
Affiliated Sub-Advisers. Specifically,
the Adviser faces those conflicts in
allocating fund assets between itself and
a Sub-Adviser, and across Sub-Advisers,
as it has an interest in considering the
benefit it will receive, directly or
indirectly, from the fee the Sub-Advised
Fund pays for the management of those
assets. Applicants also state that to the
extent the Adviser has a conflict of
interest with respect to the selection of
an Affiliated Sub-Adviser, the proposed
conditions are protective of shareholder
interests by ensuring the Board’s
independence and providing the Board
with the appropriate resources and
11 See Carillon Series Trust and Carillon Tower
Advisers, Inc., Investment Company Act Rel. Nos.
33464 (May 2, 2019) (notice) and 33494 (May 29,
2019) (order).
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
07OCN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 195 / Wednesday, October 7, 2020 / Notices
information to monitor and address
conflicts.
18. With respect to the relief
permitting Aggregate Fee Disclosure,
Applicants assert that it is appropriate
to disclose only aggregate fees paid to
Affiliated Sub-Advisers for the same
reasons that similar relief has been
granted previously with respect to
Wholly-Owned and Non-Affiliated SubAdvisers.
VI. Applicants’ Conditions
Applicants agree that any order
granting the requested relief will be
subject to the following conditions:
1. Before a Sub-Advised Fund may
rely on the order requested in the
Application, the operation of the SubAdvised Fund in the manner described
in the Application will be, or has been,
approved by a majority of the SubAdvised Fund’s outstanding voting
securities as defined in the Act, or, in
the case of a Sub-Advised Fund whose
public shareholders purchase shares on
the basis of a prospectus containing the
disclosure contemplated by condition 2
below, by the initial shareholder before
such Sub-Advised Fund’s shares are
offered to the public.
2. The prospectus for each SubAdvised Fund will disclose the
existence, substance and effect of any
order granted pursuant to the
Application. In addition, each SubAdvised Fund will hold itself out to the
public as employing the multi-manager
structure described in the Application.
The prospectus will prominently
disclose that the Adviser has the
ultimate responsibility, subject to
oversight by the Board, to oversee the
Sub-Advisers and recommend their
hiring, termination, and replacement.
3. The Adviser will provide general
management services to each SubAdvised Fund, including overall
supervisory responsibility for the
general management and investment of
the Sub-Advised Fund’s assets, and
subject to review and oversight of the
Board, will (i) set the Sub-Advised
Fund’s overall investment strategies, (ii)
evaluate, select, and recommend SubAdvisers for all or a portion of the SubAdvised Fund’s assets, (iii) allocate and,
when appropriate, reallocate the SubAdvised Fund’s assets among SubAdvisers, (iv) monitor and evaluate the
Sub-Advisers’ performance, and (v)
implement procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that Sub-Advisers
comply with the Sub-Advised Fund’s
investment objective, policies and
restrictions.
4. Sub-Advised Funds will inform
shareholders of the hiring of a new SubAdviser within 90 days after the hiring
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:21 Oct 06, 2020
Jkt 253001
of the new Sub-Adviser pursuant to the
Modified Notice and Access Procedures.
5. At all times, at least a majority of
the Board will be Independent Trustees,
and the selection and nomination of
new or additional Independent Trustees
will be placed within the discretion of
the then-existing Independent Trustees.
6. Independent Legal Counsel, as
defined in Rule 0–1(a)(6) under the Act,
will be engaged to represent the
Independent Trustees. The selection of
such counsel will be within the
discretion of the then-existing
Independent Trustees.
7. Whenever a Sub-Adviser is hired or
terminated, the Adviser will provide the
Board with information showing the
expected impact on the profitability of
the Adviser.
8. The Board must evaluate any
material conflicts that may be present in
a sub-advisory arrangement.
Specifically, whenever a sub-adviser
change is proposed for a Sub-Advised
Fund (‘‘Sub-Adviser Change’’) or the
Board considers an existing SubAdvisory Agreement as part of its
annual review process (‘‘Sub-Adviser
Review’’):
(a) The Adviser will provide the
Board, to the extent not already being
provided pursuant to section 15(c) of
the Act, with all relevant information
concerning:
(i) Any material interest in the
proposed new Sub-Adviser, in the case
of a Sub-Adviser Change, or the SubAdviser in the case of a Sub-Adviser
Review, held directly or indirectly by
the Adviser or a parent or sister
company of the Adviser, and any
material impact the proposed SubAdvisory Agreement may have on that
interest;
(ii) any arrangement or understanding
in which the Adviser or any parent or
sister company of the Adviser is a
participant that (A) may have had a
material effect on the proposed SubAdviser Change or Sub-Adviser Review,
or (B) may be materially affected by the
proposed Sub-Adviser Change or SubAdviser Review;
(iii) any material interest in a SubAdviser held directly or indirectly by an
officer or Trustee of the Sub-Advised
Fund, or an officer or board member of
the Adviser (other than through a
pooled investment vehicle not
controlled by such person); and
(iv) any other information that may be
relevant to the Board in evaluating any
potential material conflicts of interest in
the proposed Sub-Adviser Change or
Sub-Adviser Review.
(b) the Board, including a majority of
the Independent Trustees, will make a
separate finding, reflected in the Board
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
63305
minutes, that the Sub-Adviser Change or
continuation after Sub-Adviser Review
is in the best interests of the SubAdvised Fund and its shareholders and,
based on the information provided to
the Board, does not involve a conflict of
interest from which the Adviser, a SubAdviser, any officer or Trustee of the
Sub-Advised Fund, or any officer or
board member of the Adviser derives an
inappropriate advantage.
9. Each Sub-Advised Fund will
disclose in its registration statement the
Aggregate Fee Disclosure.
10. In the event that the Commission
adopts a rule under the Act providing
substantially similar relief to that in the
order requested in the Application, the
requested order will expire on the
effective date of that rule.
11. Any new Sub-Advisory
Agreement or any amendment to an
existing Investment Advisory
Agreement or Sub-Advisory Agreement
that directly or indirectly results in an
increase in the aggregate advisory fee
rate payable by the Sub-Advised Fund
will be submitted to the Sub-Advised
Fund’s shareholders for approval.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Investment Management, under delegated
authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–22111 Filed 10–6–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–90065; File No. SR–OCC–
2020–011]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of Proposed Rule Change To
Adopt a New Second Amended and
Restated Cross-Margining Agreement
Between The Options Clearing
Corporation and The Chicago
Mercantile Exchange
October 1, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on
September 22, 2020, The Options
Clearing Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with
the Securities and Exchange
Commission (‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’)
the proposed rule change as described
in Items I, II, and III below, which Items
have been prepared by OCC. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
1 15
2 17
E:\FR\FM\07OCN1.SGM
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
07OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 195 (Wednesday, October 7, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 63302-63305]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-22111]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Investment Company Act Release No. 34039; 812-15089]
Horizon Funds and Horizon Investments, LLC
October 1, 2020.
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Notice of an application under section 6(c) of the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (``Act'') for an exemption from section 15(a) of
the Act, as well as from certain disclosure requirements in rule 20a-1
under the Act, Item 19(a)(3) of Form N-1A, Items 22(c)(1)(ii),
22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and 22(c)(9) of Schedule 14A under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (``1934 Act''), and sections 6-
07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of Regulation S-X (``Disclosure Requirements'').
Applicants: Horizon Funds (the ``Trust''), a Delaware statutory trust
registered under the Act as an open-end management investment company
with multiple series (each a ``Fund'') and Horizon Investments, LLC
(the ``Initial Adviser''), a South Carolina limited liability company
registered as an investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act
of 1940 (``Advisers Act'') that serves an investment adviser to the
Funds (collectively with the Trust, the ``Applicants'').
Summary of Application: The requested exemption would permit Applicants
to enter into and materially amend subadvisory agreements with
subadvisers without shareholder approval and would grant relief from
the Disclosure Requirements as they relate to fees paid to the
subadvisers.
Filing Dates: The application was filed on January 10, 2020, and
amended on July 6, 2020.
Hearing or Notification of Hearing: An order granting the requested
relief will be issued unless the Commission orders a hearing.
Interested persons may request a hearing by emailing the Commission's
Secretary at [email protected] and serving applicants with a
copy of the request by email. Hearing requests should be received by
the Commission by 5:30 p.m. on October 26, 2020, and should be
accompanied by proof of service on the applicants, in the form of an
affidavit, or, for lawyers, a certificate of service. Pursuant to rule
0-5 under the Act, hearing requests should state the nature of the
writer's interest, any facts bearing upon the desirability of a hearing
on the matter, the reason for the request, and the issues contested.
Persons who wish to be notified of a hearing may request notification
by emailing the Commission's Secretary at [email protected].
ADDRESSES: The Commission: [email protected]. The Trust and the
Initial Adviser: 6210 Ardrey Kell Road, Suite 300, Charlotte, NC 28277.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine Y. Greenlees, Senior
Counsel, at (202) 551-6879, or Daniele Marchesani, Assistant Chief
Counsel at (202) 551-6821 (Division of Investment Management, Chief
Counsel's Office).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The following is a summary of the
application. The complete application may be obtained via the
Commission's website by searching for the file number or an Applicant
using the ``Company'' name box, at https://www.sec.gov/search/search.htm
or by calling (202) 551-8090.
I. Requested Exemptive Relief
1. Applicants request an order to permit the Adviser,\1\ subject to
the approval of the board of trustees of the Trust (collectively, the
``Board''),\2\ including a majority of the trustees who are not
``interested persons'' of the Trust or the Adviser, as defined in
section 2(a)(19) of the Act (the ``Independent Trustees''), without
obtaining shareholder approval, to: (i) Select investment sub-advisers
(``Sub-Advisers'') for all or a portion of the assets of one or more of
the Funds pursuant to an investment sub-advisory
[[Page 63303]]
agreement with each Sub-Adviser (each a ``Sub-Advisory Agreement'');
and (ii) materially amend Sub-Advisory Agreements with the Sub-
Advisers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The term ``Adviser'' means (i) the Initial Adviser, (ii) its
successors, and (iii) any entity controlling, controlled by or under
common control with, the Initial Adviser or its successors that
serves as the primary adviser to a Sub-Advised Fund (as defined
below). For the purposes of the requested order, ``successor'' is
limited to an entity that results from a reorganization into another
jurisdiction or a change in the type of business organization.
\2\ The term ``Board'' also includes the board of trustees or
directors of a future Sub-Advised Fund (as defined below), if
different from the board of trustees of the Trust.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Applicants also request an order exempting the Sub-Advised Funds
(as defined below) from the Disclosure Requirements, which require each
Fund to disclose fees paid to a Sub-Adviser. Applicants seek relief to
permit each Sub-Advised Fund to disclose (as a dollar amount and a
percentage of the Fund's net assets): (i) The aggregate fees paid to
the Adviser and any Wholly-Owned Sub-Advisers; and (ii) the aggregate
fees paid to Affiliated and Non-Affiliated Sub-Advisers (``Aggregate
Fee Disclosure'').\3\ Applicants seek an exemption to permit a Sub-
Advised Fund to include only the Aggregate Fee Disclosure.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ A ``Wholly-Owned Sub-Adviser'' is any investment adviser
that is (1) an indirect or direct ``wholly-owned subsidiary'' (as
such term is defined in section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act) of the
Adviser, (2) a ``sister company'' of the Adviser that is an indirect
or direct ``wholly-owned subsidiary'' of the same company that
indirectly or directly wholly owns the Adviser (the Adviser's
``parent company''), or (3) a parent company of the Adviser. A
``Non-Affiliated Sub-Adviser'' is any investment adviser that is not
an ``affiliated person'' (as defined in the 1940 Act) of a Fund or
the Adviser, except to the extent that an affiliation arises solely
because the Sub-Adviser serves as a sub-adviser to one or more
Funds. Section 2(a)(43) of the 1940 Act defines ``wholly-owned
subsidiary'' of a person as a company 95 per centum or more of the
outstanding voting securities of which are, directly or indirectly,
owned by such a person.
\4\ Applicants note that all other items required by sections 6-
07(2)(a), (b) and (c) of Regulation S-X will be disclosed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Applicants request that the relief apply to Applicants, as well
as to any future Fund and any other existing or future registered open-
end management investment company or series thereof that intends to
rely on the requested order in the future and that: (i) Is advised by
the Adviser; (ii) uses the multi-manager structure described in the
application; and (iii) complies with the terms and conditions of the
application (each, a ``Sub-Advised Fund'').\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ All registered open-end investment companies that currently
intend to rely on the requested order are named as Applicants. Any
entity that relies on the requested order will do so only in
accordance with the terms and conditions contained in the
application.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Management of the Sub-Advised Funds
4. The Adviser serves or will serve as the investment adviser to
each Sub-Advised Fund pursuant to an investment advisory agreement with
the Fund (each an ``Investment Advisory Agreement''). Each Investment
Advisory Agreement has been or will be approved by the Board, including
a majority of the Independent Trustees, and by the shareholders of the
relevant Sub-Advised Fund in the manner required by sections 15(a) and
15(c) of the Act. The terms of these Investment Advisory Agreements
comply or will comply with section 15(a) of the Act. Applicants are not
seeking an exemption from the Act with respect to the Investment
Advisory Agreements. Pursuant to the terms of each Investment Advisory
Agreement, the Adviser, subject to the oversight of the Board, will
provide continuous investment management for each Sub-Advised Fund. For
its services to each Sub-Advised Fund, the Adviser receives or will
receive an investment advisory fee from that Fund as specified in the
applicable Investment Advisory Agreement.
5. Consistent with the terms of each Investment Advisory Agreement,
the Adviser may, subject to the approval of the Board, including a
majority of the Independent Trustees, and the shareholders of the
applicable Sub-Advised Fund (if required by applicable law), delegate
portfolio management responsibilities of all or a portion of the assets
of a Sub-Advised Fund to a Sub-Adviser. The Adviser will retain overall
responsibility for the management and investment of the assets of each
Sub-Advised Fund. This responsibility includes recommending the removal
or replacement of Sub-Advisers, allocating the portion of that Sub-
Advised Fund's assets to any given Sub-Adviser and reallocating those
assets as necessary from time to time.\6\ The Sub-Advisers will be
``investment advisers'' to the Sub-Advised Funds within the meaning of
section 2(a)(20) of the Act and will provide investment management
services to the Funds subject to, without limitation, the requirements
of sections 15(c) and 36(b) of the Act.\7\ The Sub-Advisers, subject to
the oversight of the Adviser and the Board, will determine the
securities and other investments to be purchased, sold or entered into
by a Sub-Advised Fund's portfolio or a portion thereof, and will place
orders with brokers or dealers that they select.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Applicants represent that if the name of any Sub-Advised
Fund contains the name of a sub-adviser, the name of the Adviser
that serves as the primary adviser to the Fund, or a trademark or
trade name that is owned by or publicly used to identify the
Adviser, will precede the name of the sub-adviser.
\7\ The Sub-Advisers will be registered with the Commission as
an investment adviser under the Advisers Act or not subject to such
registration.
\8\ A ``Sub-Adviser'' also includes an investment sub-adviser
that provides or will provide the Adviser with a model portfolio
reflecting a specific strategy, style or focus with respect to the
investment of all or a portion of a Sub-Advised Fund's assets. The
Adviser may use the model portfolio to determine the securities and
other instruments to be purchased, sold or entered into by a Sub-
Advised Fund's portfolio or a portion thereof, and place orders with
brokers or dealers that it selects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. The Sub-Advisory Agreements will be approved by the Board,
including a majority of the Independent Trustees, in accordance with
sections 15(a) and 15(c) of the Act. In addition, the terms of each
Sub-Advisory Agreement will comply fully with the requirements of
section 15(a) of the Act. The Adviser may compensate the Sub-Advisers
or the Sub-Advised Funds may compensate the Sub-Advisers directly.
7. Sub-Advised Funds will inform shareholders of the hiring of a
new Sub-Adviser pursuant to the following procedures (``Modified Notice
and Access Procedures''): (a) Within 90 days after a new Sub-Adviser is
hired for any Sub-Advised Fund, that Fund will send its shareholders
either a Multi-manager Notice or a Multi-manager Notice and Multi-
manager Information Statement; \9\ and (b) the Sub-Advised Fund will
make the Multi-manager Information Statement available on the website
identified in the Multi-manager Notice no later than when the Multi-
manager Notice (or Multi-manager Notice and Multi-manager Information
Statement) is first sent to shareholders, and will maintain it on that
website for at least 90 days.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ A ``Multi-manager Notice'' will be modeled on a Notice of
internet Availability as defined in Rule 14a-16 under the 1934 Act,
and specifically will, among other things: (a) Summarize the
relevant information regarding the new Sub-Adviser (except as
modified to permit Aggregate Fee Disclosure); (b) inform
shareholders that the Multi-manager Information Statement is
available on a website; (c) provide the website address; (d) state
the time period during which the Multi-manager Information Statement
will remain available on that website; (e) provide instructions for
accessing and printing the Multi-manager Information Statement; and
(f) instruct the shareholder that a paper or email copy of the
Multi-manager Information Statement may be obtained, without charge,
by contacting the Sub-Advised Fund. A ``Multi-manager Information
Statement'' will meet the requirements of Regulation 14C, Schedule
14C and Item 22 of Schedule 14A under the 1934 Act for an
information statement, except as modified by the requested order to
permit Aggregate Fee Disclosure. Multi-manager Information
Statements will be filed with the Commission via the EDGAR system.
\10\ In addition, Applicants represent that whenever a Sub-
Adviser is hired or terminated, or a Sub-Advisory Agreement is
materially amended, the Sub-Advised Fund's prospectus and statement
of additional information will be supplemented promptly pursuant to
rule 497(e) under the Securities Act of 1933.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Applicable Law
8. Section 15(a) of the Act states, in part, that it is unlawful
for any person to act as an investment adviser to a registered
investment company ``except pursuant to a written contract, which
contract, whether with such registered
[[Page 63304]]
company or with an investment adviser of such registered company, has
been approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding voting
securities of such registered company.''
9. Form N-1A is the registration statement used by open-end
investment companies. Item 19(a)(3) of Form N-1A requires a registered
investment company to disclose in its statement of additional
information the method of computing the ``advisory fee payable'' by the
investment company with respect to each investment adviser, including
the total dollar amounts that the investment company ``paid to the
adviser (aggregated with amounts paid to affiliated advisers, if any),
and any advisers who are not affiliated persons of the adviser, under
the investment advisory contract for the last three fiscal years.''
10. Rule 20a-1 under the Act requires proxies solicited with
respect to a registered investment company to comply with Schedule 14A
under the 1934 Act. Items 22(c)(1)(ii), 22(c)(1)(iii), 22(c)(8) and
22(c)(9) of Schedule 14A, taken together, require a proxy statement for
a shareholder meeting at which the advisory contract will be voted upon
to include the ``rate of compensation of the investment adviser,'' the
``aggregate amount of the investment adviser's fee,'' a description of
the ``terms of the contract to be acted upon,'' and, if a change in the
advisory fee is proposed, the existing and proposed fees and the
difference between the two fees.
11. Regulation S-X sets forth the requirements for financial
statements required to be included as part of a registered investment
company's registration statement and shareholder reports filed with the
Commission. Sections 6-07(2)(a), (b), and (c) of Regulation S-X require
a registered investment company to include in its financial statements
information about investment advisory fees.
12. Section 6(c) of the Act provides that the Commission may exempt
any person, security, or transaction or any class or classes of
persons, securities, or transactions from any provisions of the Act, or
any rule thereunder, if such exemption is necessary or appropriate in
the public interest and consistent with the protection of investors and
the purposes fairly intended by the policy and provisions of the Act.
Applicants state that the requested relief meets this standard for the
reasons discussed below.
IV. Arguments in Support of the Requested Relief
13. Applicants assert that, from the perspective of the
shareholder, the role of the Sub-Advisers is substantially equivalent
to the limited role of the individual portfolio managers employed by an
investment adviser to a traditional investment company. Applicants also
assert that the shareholders expect the Adviser, subject to review and
approval of the Board, to select a Sub-Adviser who is in the best
position to achieve the Sub-Advised Fund's investment objective.
Applicants believe that permitting the Adviser to perform the duties
for which the shareholders of the Sub-Advised Fund are paying the
Adviser--the selection, oversight and evaluation of the Sub-Adviser--
without incurring unnecessary delays or expenses of convening special
meetings of shareholders is appropriate and in the interest of the
Fund's shareholders, and will allow such Fund to operate more
efficiently. Applicants state that each Investment Advisory Agreement
will continue to be fully subject to section 15(a) of the Act and
approved by the relevant Board, including a majority of the Independent
Trustees, in the manner required by section 15(a) and 15(c) of the Act.
14. Applicants submit that the requested relief meets the standards
for relief under section 6(c) of the Act. Applicants state that the
operation of the Sub-Advised Fund in the manner described in the
Application must be approved by shareholders of that Fund before it may
rely on the requested relief. Applicants also state that the proposed
conditions to the requested relief are designed to address any
potential conflicts of interest or economic incentives, and provide
that shareholders are informed when new Sub-Advisers are hired.
15. Applicants contend that, in the circumstances described in the
application, a proxy solicitation to approve the appointment of new
Sub-Advisers provides no more meaningful information to shareholders
than the proposed Multi-manager Information Statement. Applicants state
that, accordingly, they believe the requested relief is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, and consistent with the protection
of investors and the purposes fairly intended by the policy and
provisions of the Act.
16. With respect to the relief permitting Aggregate Fee Disclosure,
Applicants assert that disclosure of the individual fees paid to the
Sub-Advisers does not serve any meaningful purpose. Applicants contend
that the primary reasons for requiring disclosure of individual fees
paid to Sub-Advisers are to inform shareholders of expenses to be
charged by a particular Sub-Advised Fund and to enable shareholders to
compare the fees to those of other comparable investment companies.
Applicants believe that the requested relief satisfies these objectives
because the Sub-Advised Fund's overall advisory fee will be fully
disclosed and, therefore, shareholders will know what the Sub-Advised
Fund's fees and expenses are and will be able to compare the advisory
fees a Sub-Advised Fund is charged to those of other investment
companies. In addition, Applicants assert that the requested relief
would benefit shareholders of the Sub-Advised Fund because it would
improve the Adviser's ability to negotiate the fees paid to Sub-
Advisers. In particular, Applicants state that if the Adviser is not
required to disclose the Sub-Advisers' fees to the public, the Adviser
may be able to negotiate rates that are below a Sub-Adviser's
``posted'' amounts. Applicants assert that the relief will also
encourage Sub-Advisers to negotiate lower sub-advisory fees with the
Adviser if the lower fees are not required to be made public.
V. Relief for Affiliated Sub-Advisers
17. The Commission has granted the requested relief with respect to
Wholly-Owned and Non-Affiliated Sub-Advisers through numerous exemptive
orders. The Commission also has extended the requested relief to
Affiliated Sub-Advisers.\11\ Applicants state that although the
Adviser's judgment in recommending a Sub-Adviser can be affected by
certain conflicts, they do not warrant denying the extension of the
requested relief to Affiliated Sub-Advisers. Specifically, the Adviser
faces those conflicts in allocating fund assets between itself and a
Sub-Adviser, and across Sub-Advisers, as it has an interest in
considering the benefit it will receive, directly or indirectly, from
the fee the Sub-Advised Fund pays for the management of those assets.
Applicants also state that to the extent the Adviser has a conflict of
interest with respect to the selection of an Affiliated Sub-Adviser,
the proposed conditions are protective of shareholder interests by
ensuring the Board's independence and providing the Board with the
appropriate resources and
[[Page 63305]]
information to monitor and address conflicts.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Carillon Series Trust and Carillon Tower Advisers,
Inc., Investment Company Act Rel. Nos. 33464 (May 2, 2019) (notice)
and 33494 (May 29, 2019) (order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
18. With respect to the relief permitting Aggregate Fee Disclosure,
Applicants assert that it is appropriate to disclose only aggregate
fees paid to Affiliated Sub-Advisers for the same reasons that similar
relief has been granted previously with respect to Wholly-Owned and
Non-Affiliated Sub-Advisers.
VI. Applicants' Conditions
Applicants agree that any order granting the requested relief will
be subject to the following conditions:
1. Before a Sub-Advised Fund may rely on the order requested in the
Application, the operation of the Sub-Advised Fund in the manner
described in the Application will be, or has been, approved by a
majority of the Sub-Advised Fund's outstanding voting securities as
defined in the Act, or, in the case of a Sub-Advised Fund whose public
shareholders purchase shares on the basis of a prospectus containing
the disclosure contemplated by condition 2 below, by the initial
shareholder before such Sub-Advised Fund's shares are offered to the
public.
2. The prospectus for each Sub-Advised Fund will disclose the
existence, substance and effect of any order granted pursuant to the
Application. In addition, each Sub-Advised Fund will hold itself out to
the public as employing the multi-manager structure described in the
Application. The prospectus will prominently disclose that the Adviser
has the ultimate responsibility, subject to oversight by the Board, to
oversee the Sub-Advisers and recommend their hiring, termination, and
replacement.
3. The Adviser will provide general management services to each
Sub-Advised Fund, including overall supervisory responsibility for the
general management and investment of the Sub-Advised Fund's assets, and
subject to review and oversight of the Board, will (i) set the Sub-
Advised Fund's overall investment strategies, (ii) evaluate, select,
and recommend Sub-Advisers for all or a portion of the Sub-Advised
Fund's assets, (iii) allocate and, when appropriate, reallocate the
Sub-Advised Fund's assets among Sub-Advisers, (iv) monitor and evaluate
the Sub-Advisers' performance, and (v) implement procedures reasonably
designed to ensure that Sub-Advisers comply with the Sub-Advised Fund's
investment objective, policies and restrictions.
4. Sub-Advised Funds will inform shareholders of the hiring of a
new Sub-Adviser within 90 days after the hiring of the new Sub-Adviser
pursuant to the Modified Notice and Access Procedures.
5. At all times, at least a majority of the Board will be
Independent Trustees, and the selection and nomination of new or
additional Independent Trustees will be placed within the discretion of
the then-existing Independent Trustees.
6. Independent Legal Counsel, as defined in Rule 0-1(a)(6) under
the Act, will be engaged to represent the Independent Trustees. The
selection of such counsel will be within the discretion of the then-
existing Independent Trustees.
7. Whenever a Sub-Adviser is hired or terminated, the Adviser will
provide the Board with information showing the expected impact on the
profitability of the Adviser.
8. The Board must evaluate any material conflicts that may be
present in a sub-advisory arrangement. Specifically, whenever a sub-
adviser change is proposed for a Sub-Advised Fund (``Sub-Adviser
Change'') or the Board considers an existing Sub-Advisory Agreement as
part of its annual review process (``Sub-Adviser Review''):
(a) The Adviser will provide the Board, to the extent not already
being provided pursuant to section 15(c) of the Act, with all relevant
information concerning:
(i) Any material interest in the proposed new Sub-Adviser, in the
case of a Sub-Adviser Change, or the Sub-Adviser in the case of a Sub-
Adviser Review, held directly or indirectly by the Adviser or a parent
or sister company of the Adviser, and any material impact the proposed
Sub-Advisory Agreement may have on that interest;
(ii) any arrangement or understanding in which the Adviser or any
parent or sister company of the Adviser is a participant that (A) may
have had a material effect on the proposed Sub-Adviser Change or Sub-
Adviser Review, or (B) may be materially affected by the proposed Sub-
Adviser Change or Sub-Adviser Review;
(iii) any material interest in a Sub-Adviser held directly or
indirectly by an officer or Trustee of the Sub-Advised Fund, or an
officer or board member of the Adviser (other than through a pooled
investment vehicle not controlled by such person); and
(iv) any other information that may be relevant to the Board in
evaluating any potential material conflicts of interest in the proposed
Sub-Adviser Change or Sub-Adviser Review.
(b) the Board, including a majority of the Independent Trustees,
will make a separate finding, reflected in the Board minutes, that the
Sub-Adviser Change or continuation after Sub-Adviser Review is in the
best interests of the Sub-Advised Fund and its shareholders and, based
on the information provided to the Board, does not involve a conflict
of interest from which the Adviser, a Sub-Adviser, any officer or
Trustee of the Sub-Advised Fund, or any officer or board member of the
Adviser derives an inappropriate advantage.
9. Each Sub-Advised Fund will disclose in its registration
statement the Aggregate Fee Disclosure.
10. In the event that the Commission adopts a rule under the Act
providing substantially similar relief to that in the order requested
in the Application, the requested order will expire on the effective
date of that rule.
11. Any new Sub-Advisory Agreement or any amendment to an existing
Investment Advisory Agreement or Sub-Advisory Agreement that directly
or indirectly results in an increase in the aggregate advisory fee rate
payable by the Sub-Advised Fund will be submitted to the Sub-Advised
Fund's shareholders for approval.
For the Commission, by the Division of Investment Management,
under delegated authority.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-22111 Filed 10-6-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P