Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the Republic of India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 62697-62698 [2020-21965]
Download as PDF
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 193 / Monday, October 5, 2020 / Notices
necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance
the quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including through the
use of appropriate automated,
electronical, mechanical, or other
technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Title: Technical Assistance and
Training for Innovative Regional
Wastewater Treatment Solutions (TAT/
RWTS) Grant Pilot Program.
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The TAT/RWTS Grant Pilot
Program was authorized by the Further
Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020,
for the study and design of innovative
treatment solutions of regional
wastewater systems for historically
impoverished communities that have
had difficulty installing traditional
wastewater treatment systems due to
soil conditions. Qualified regional
consortiums will receive TAT/RWTS
grant funds to identify and evaluate
economically feasible, innovative
regional solutions to wastewater
treatment concerns for historically
impoverished communities in areas
which have had difficulty installing
traditional wastewater treatment
systems due to soil conditions. Grants
are for wastewater-related technical
assistance, including such services as
feasibility studies, preliminary design
assistance and supervision, oversight, or
training for the development of an
application for financial assistance.
Grantees will be expected to provide
the Agency with a detailed report to
include the area to be served, the issues
with the present method of wastewater
discharge, the alternatives and
innovative solutions to the wastewater
issue, the long-term cost and effect of
the solution, the affordability including
possible funding sources, potential
treatment, staff training needs, and
lifecycle cost analysis.
Estimate of Burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 4.5 hours per
response.
Respondents: Regional consortia of
higher education, academic health and
research institutes, or economic
development entities.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 3.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 1.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:42 Oct 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
Estimated Total Annual Burden and
Record Keeping Hours on Respondents:
242 hours.
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from MaryPat Daskal,
Regulatory Division Team 2, Rural
Development Innovation Center, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, 1400
Independence Ave. SW, Stop 1522,
Washington, DC 20250. Phone: 202–
720–7853.
All responses to this information
collection and recordkeeping notice will
be summarized and included in the
request for OMB approval. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
B. Nondiscrimination Statement
The U.S. Department of Agriculture
(USDA) prohibits discrimination against
its customers, employees, and
applicants for employment on the basis
of race, color, national origin, age,
disability, sex, gender identity, reprisal
and where applicable, political beliefs,
marital status, familiar or parental
status, religion, sexual orientation, or all
or part of an individual’s income is
derived from any public assistance
program, or protected genetic
information in employment or in any
program or activity conducted or funded
by the Department. (Not all prohibited
bases will apply to all programs and/or
employment activities.)
If you wish to file a Civil Rights
program complaint of discrimination,
complete the USDA Program
Discrimination Complaint Form (PDF),
found online at https://
www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_
cust.html, or complete the form at any
USDA office, or call (866) 632–9992 to
request the form. You may also write a
letter containing all of the information
requested in the form. Send your
completed complaint form or letter to us
by mail at U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Director, Office of
Adjudication, 1400 Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–
9410, by fax (202) 690–7442 or email at
program.intake@usda.gov.
Individuals who are deaf, hard of
hearing or have speech disabilities and
wish to file either an EEO or program
complaint, please contact USDA
through the Federal Relay Service at
(800) 877–8339 or (800) 845–6136 (in
Spanish).
Persons with disabilities, who wish to
file a program complaint, please see
information above on how to contact us
directly by mail or by email. If you
require alternative means of
communication for program
information, (e.g., Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) please contact USDA’s
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
62697
TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600
(voice and TDD).
Chad A. Rupe,
Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–21924 Filed 10–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–533–839]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the
Republic of India: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review; 2017
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) determines that Pidilite
Industries Limited (Pidilite) a producer/
exporter of carbazole violet pigment 23
(CVP 23) from the Republic of India
(India) received countervailable
subsidies during the period of review
January 1, 2017 through December 31,
2017.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable October 5, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary
Results of this administrative review on
February 11, 2020.1 On April 24, 2020,
Commerce exercised its discretion to
toll all deadlines in administrative
reviews by 50 days.2 On July 21, 2020,
Commerce tolled all deadlines in
administrative reviews by an additional
60 days.3 The deadline for the final
results of this review is now September
28, 2020. For a history of all events that
occurred since the Preliminary Results,
1 See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the
Republic of India: Preliminary Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017,
85 FR 7730 (February 11, 2020) (Preliminary
Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
2 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews,’’ dated July 21, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
62698
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 193 / Monday, October 5, 2020 / Notices
see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.4
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is CVP 23 identified as Color Index No.
51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–
30–1, with the chemical name of
diindolo [3,2-b:3’,2’-m]
triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,15diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and molecular
formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2.5 For a
complete description of the scope of the
order, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from
interested parties, Commerce made no
changes to the subsidy rate calculations
since the Preliminary Results.
Final Results of the Administrative
Review
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.221(b)(5), Commerce determines the
following net countervailable subsidy
rate for Pidilite for the period January 1,
2017 through December 31, 2017:
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties’
briefs are addressed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum. The Issues and
Decision Memorandum is a public
document and is on file electronically
via Enforcement and Compliance’s
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Centralized Electronic Service System
(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to
registered users at https://
access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete
version of the Issues and Decision
Memorandum can be accessed directly
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/.
The signed and electronic versions of
the Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content. A list of the
issues raised by interested parties, and
to which we responded in the Issues
and Decision Memorandum, is provided
in the appendix to this notice.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this
administrative review in accordance
with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For
each of the subsidy programs found to
be countervailable, Commerce
determines that there is a subsidy, i.e.,
a government-provided financial
contribution that gives rise to a benefit
to the recipient, and that the subsidy is
specific.6 For a full description of the
methodology underlying Commerce’s
conclusions, see the Issues and Decision
Memorandum.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
4 See
Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision
Memorandum for the Final Results of the
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the Republic of
Turkey; 2017,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision
Memorandum).
5 The bracketed section of the product
description, [3,2-b:3’,2’-m], is not business
proprietary information; the brackets are simply
part of the chemical nomenclature.
6 See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act
regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E)
of the Act regarding benefit; and 771(5A) of the Act
regarding specificity.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
23:42 Oct 02, 2020
Jkt 253001
Subsidy
rate
(percent)
(ad valorem)
Company
Pidilite Industries Limited ......
3.13
Disclosure
Because Commerce made no changes
to the subsidy rate calculations since the
Preliminary Results, there are no further
calculations performed to disclose to
interested parties in connection with
these final results.7
Assessment Rate
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to
issue assessment instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15
days after the date of publication of
these final results of review, to liquidate
shipments of subject merchandise
produced and/or exported by Pidilite
and entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
January 1, 2017 through December 31,
2017, at the ad valorem assessment rate
listed above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit
requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of the final
results of this administrative review for
all shipments of the subject
merchandise entered, or withdrawn
from warehouse, for consumption on or
after the date of publication, as provided
by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1)
The cash deposit rate for the companies
listed in these final results will be equal
to the subsidy rates established in the
final results of this review; (2) for all
non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue
to collect cash deposits at the mostrecent company-specific or all-others
rate applicable to the company, as
appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall
remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
destruction of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and
published in accordance with sections
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 28, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and
Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail the Duty Drawback Program
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail the Export Promotion of
Capital Goods Scheme
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should
Countervail the Income Tax Deduction
for Research and Development Expenses
Program Under Section 35 (2AB) of the
Income Tax Act of 1961
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020–21965 Filed 10–2–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Institute of Standards and
Technology
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Deprecation of the United States (U.S.)
Survey Foot
The National Institute of
Standards and Technology and National
Geodetic Survey (NGS), National Ocean
Service (NOS), National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA),
Department of Commerce (DOC).
ACTION: Notice; final determination.
AGENCY:
7 In
accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b),
Commerce is normally required to disclose
calculations performed in connection with the final
results of an administrative review within five days
of its public announcement or, if there is no public
announcement of, within five days after the date of
publication of the final results of an administrative
review.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\05OCN1.SGM
05OCN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 193 (Monday, October 5, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 62697-62698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-21965]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-533-839]
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 From the Republic of India: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2017
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) determines that Pidilite
Industries Limited (Pidilite) a producer/exporter of carbazole violet
pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the Republic of India (India) received
countervailable subsidies during the period of review January 1, 2017
through December 31, 2017.
DATES: Applicable October 5, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene H. Calvert, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-3586.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this administrative
review on February 11, 2020.\1\ On April 24, 2020, Commerce exercised
its discretion to toll all deadlines in administrative reviews by 50
days.\2\ On July 21, 2020, Commerce tolled all deadlines in
administrative reviews by an additional 60 days.\3\ The deadline for
the final results of this review is now September 28, 2020. For a
history of all events that occurred since the Preliminary Results,
[[Page 62698]]
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the Republic of India:
Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review;
2017, 85 FR 7730 (February 11, 2020) (Preliminary Results), and
accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
\2\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews in Response to
Operational Adjustments Due to COVID-19,'' dated April 24, 2020.
\3\ See Memorandum, ``Tolling of Deadlines for Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews,'' dated July 21, 2020.
\4\ See Memorandum, ``Issues and Decision Memorandum for the
Final Results of the Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the Republic of Turkey; 2017,''
dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, this notice (Issues
and Decision Memorandum).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is CVP 23 identified as Color
Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-30-1, with the chemical
name of diindolo [3,2-b:3',2'-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5,15-
diethy-5,15-dihydro-, and molecular formula of
C34H22Cl2N4O2.\5\
For a complete description of the scope of the order, see the Issues
and Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-
b:3',2'-m], is not business proprietary information; the brackets
are simply part of the chemical nomenclature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in interested parties' briefs are addressed in
the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues
and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/. The signed and electronic versions of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. A list of the
issues raised by interested parties, and to which we responded in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided in the appendix to this
notice.
Methodology
Commerce conducted this administrative review in accordance with
section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
For each of the subsidy programs found to be countervailable, Commerce
determines that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided
financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient,
and that the subsidy is specific.\6\ For a full description of the
methodology underlying Commerce's conclusions, see the Issues and
Decision Memorandum.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act regarding
financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) of the Act regarding
benefit; and 771(5A) of the Act regarding specificity.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Changes Since the Preliminary Results
Based on the comments received from interested parties, Commerce
made no changes to the subsidy rate calculations since the Preliminary
Results.
Final Results of the Administrative Review
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5), Commerce determines the
following net countervailable subsidy rate for Pidilite for the period
January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Company (percent) (ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pidilite Industries Limited............................. 3.13
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclosure
Because Commerce made no changes to the subsidy rate calculations
since the Preliminary Results, there are no further calculations
performed to disclose to interested parties in connection with these
final results.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b), Commerce is normally
required to disclose calculations performed in connection with the
final results of an administrative review within five days of its
public announcement or, if there is no public announcement of,
within five days after the date of publication of the final results
of an administrative review.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment Rate
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2), Commerce intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 15
days after the date of publication of these final results of review, to
liquidate shipments of subject merchandise produced and/or exported by
Pidilite and entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on
or after January 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017, at the ad valorem
assessment rate listed above.
Cash Deposit Requirements
The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon
publication of the notice of the final results of this administrative
review for all shipments of the subject merchandise entered, or
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the date of
publication, as provided by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The
cash deposit rate for the companies listed in these final results will
be equal to the subsidy rates established in the final results of this
review; (2) for all non-reviewed firms, CBP will continue to collect
cash deposits at the most-recent company-specific or all-others rate
applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposit
requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further
notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the destruction of proprietary information disclosed under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written
notification of the return or destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to
comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable
violation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These final results are issued and published in accordance with
sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: September 28, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum
I. Summary
II. Background
III. Scope of the Order
IV. Subsidies Valuation Information
V. Analysis of Programs
VI. Analysis of Comments
Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Duty Drawback
Program
Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Export
Promotion of Capital Goods Scheme
Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should Countervail the Income Tax
Deduction for Research and Development Expenses Program Under
Section 35 (2AB) of the Income Tax Act of 1961
VII. Recommendation
[FR Doc. 2020-21965 Filed 10-2-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P