Certain Non-Invasive Aesthetic Body-Contouring Devices, Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; Institution of Investigation, 55687-55688 [2020-19816]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 175 / Wednesday, September 9, 2020 / Notices
Under
section 11 of the Indian Gaming
Regulatory Act (IGRA) Public Law 100–
497, 25 U.S.C. 2701 et seq., the
Secretary of the Interior shall publish in
the Federal Register notice of approved
Tribal-State compacts for the purpose of
engaging in class III gaming activities on
Indian lands. As required by IGRA and
25 CFR 293.4, all compacts and
amendments are subject to review and
approval by the Secretary. The compact
amendment authorizes the Tribe to
waive the required payment to the
Community Benefit Fund for the year
2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Tara Sweeney,
Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.
[FR Doc. 2020–19928 Filed 9–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4337–15–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–1219]
Certain Non-Invasive Aesthetic BodyContouring Devices, Components
Thereof, and Methods of Using Same;
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
August 5, 2020, under section 337 of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on
behalf of BTL Industries, Inc. of
Marlborough, Massachusetts. The
complaint alleges violations of section
337 based upon the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States
after importation of certain non-invasive
aesthetic body-contouring devices,
components thereof, and methods of
using same by reason of infringement of
certain claims of U.S. Patent No.
10,632,321 (‘‘the ’321 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 10,695,575 (‘‘the ’575
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 10,695,576
(‘‘the ’576 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
10,709,894 (‘‘the ’894 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 10,709,895 (‘‘the ’895
patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 10,478,634
(‘‘the ’634 patent’’). The complaint
further alleges that an industry in the
United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute. The
complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and cease and
desist orders.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:47 Sep 08, 2020
Jkt 250001
The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help
accessing EDIS, please email
EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade
Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for
institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C.
1337, and in section 210.10 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
September 2, 2020, ordered that—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1,
2, 4, 6–8, 10, 12–16, 20, 22, 23, and 26–
28 of the ’321 patent; claims 1, 9–11, 13,
15, 16, and 20–22 of the ’575 patent;
claims 1, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 23–25, 27,
and 28 of the ’576 patent; claims 1, 2,
4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17–21, 23, 24, and 26–
29 of the ’894 patent; claims 1, 2–6, 9,
10, and 14–25 of the ’895 patent; and
claims 1, 6, 7, 16, 21, and 22 of the ’634
patent, and whether an industry in the
United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of
the Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the
plain language description of the
accused products or category of accused
products, which defines the scope of the
investigation, is: Non-invasive magnetic
and cryolipolysis aesthetic bodycontouring products and their
components, including main units,
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00052
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
55687
applicators, straps, massagers, gel traps,
and virtual consumables such as
treatment cards that enable the products
to administer the pre-programmed
treatment protocols;
(3) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: BTL
Industries, Inc., 362 Elm Street,
Marlborough, MA 01752.
(b) The respondents are the following
entities alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and are the parties upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Allergan Limited, Clonshaugh Business
and Technology Park, Coolock,
Dublin D17 E400, Ireland
Allergan USA, Inc., 5 Giralda Farms,
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Allergan, Inc., 5 Giralda Farms,
Madison, New Jersey 07940
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc., 4410 Rosewood
Dr., Pleasanton, California 94588–
3050
Zeltiq Ireland Unlimited Company,
Galway West Business Park, Western
Distributor Road, Knocknacarra,
Galway H91E8C3, Ireland
Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH,
Junkersstrabe 9, 89231, Neu-Ulm,
Germany
(4) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations will not participate as a
party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as
amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19,
2020), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if
received not later than 20 days after the
date of service by the complainant of the
complaint and the notice of
investigation. Extensions of time for
submitting responses to the complaint
and the notice of investigation will not
be granted unless good cause therefor is
shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely
response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
55688
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 175 / Wednesday, September 9, 2020 / Notices
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 2, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020–19816 Filed 9–8–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 731–TA–1472 (Final)]
Difluoromethane (R–32) From China;
Scheduling of the Final Phase of an
Anti-Dumping Duty Investigation
United States International
Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Commission hereby gives
notice of the scheduling of the final
phase of antidumping investigation No.
731–TA–1472 (Final) pursuant to the
Tariff Act of 1930 (‘‘the Act’’) to
determine whether an industry in the
United States is materially injured or
threatened with material injury, or the
establishment of an industry in the
United States is materially retarded, by
reason of imports of difluoromethane
(R–32) from China, provided for in
subheading 2903.39.20 of the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States, preliminarily determined
by the Department of Commerce
(‘‘Commerce’’) to be sold at less-thanfair-value.
DATES: August 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ahdia Bavari ((202) 205–3191), Office of
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW,
Washington, DC 20436. Hearingimpaired persons can obtain
information on this matter by contacting
the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–
205–1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special
assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office
of the Secretary at 202–205–2000.
General information concerning the
Commission may also be obtained by
accessing its internet server (https://
www.usitc.gov). The public record for
this investigation may be viewed on the
Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS)
at https://edis.usitc.gov.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:06 Sep 08, 2020
Jkt 250001
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Scope.—For purposes of this
investigation, Commerce has defined
the subject merchandise as
‘‘difluoromethane (R–32), or its
chemical equivalent, regardless of form,
type or purity level. R–32 has the
Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS)
registry number of 75–10–5 and the
chemical formula CH2 F2. R–32 is also
referred to as difluoromethane, HFC–32,
FC–32, Freon-32, methylene difluoride,
methylene fluoride, carbon fluoride
hydride, halocarbon R32, fluorocarbon
R32, and UN 3252. Subject merchandise
also includes R–32 and unpurified R–32
that are processed in a third country or
the United States, including, but not
limited to, purifying or any other
processing that would not otherwise
remove the merchandise from the scope
of this investigation if performed in the
country of manufacture of the in-scope
R–32. R–32 that has been blended with
products other than pentafluoroethane
(R–125) is included within this scope if
such blends contain 85% or more by
volume on an actual percentage basis of
R–32. In addition, R–32 that has been
blended with any amount of R–125 is
included within this scope if such
blends contain more than 52% by
volume on an actual percentage basis of
R–32. Whether R–32 is blended with R–
125 or other products, only the R–32
component of the mixture is covered by
the scope of this investigation. The
scope also includes R–32 that is
commingled with R–32 from sources not
subject to this investigation. Only the
subject component of such commingled
products is covered by the scope of this
investigation. Excluded from the current
scope is merchandise covered by the
scope of the antidumping order on
hydrofluorocarbon blends from the
People’s Republic of China.’’ 1 2
The products included in the scope of
this investigation may enter under
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) subheading
2903.39.2035. Other merchandise
subject to the current scope, including
the abovementioned blends that are
outside the scope of the Blends Order,
may be classified under 2903.39.2045
and 3824.78.0020. The HTSUS
subheadings and CAS registry number
are provided for convenience and
customs purposes. The written
description of the scope of the
investigation is dispositive.
1 See Hydrofluorocarbon Blends from the People’s
Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 81 FR
55436, August 19, 2016 (the Blends Order).
2 For a complete definition, please see
Commerce’s scope in 85 FR 52950, August 27, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00053
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Background.—The final phase of this
investigation is being scheduled,
pursuant to section 735(b) of the Tariff
Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1673d(b)), as a
result of an affirmative preliminary
determination by Commerce that
imports of difluoromethane (R–32) from
China are being sold in the United
States at less than fair value within the
meaning of § 733 of the Act (19 U.S.C.
1673b). The investigation was requested
in a petition filed on January 23, 2020,
by Arkema, Inc., King of Prussia,
Pennsylvania.
For further information concerning
the conduct of this phase of the
investigation, hearing procedures, and
rules of general application, consult the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, part 201, subparts A and B
(19 CFR part 201), and part 207,
subparts A and C (19 CFR part 207).
Participation in the investigation and
public service list.—Persons, including
industrial users of the subject
merchandise and, if the merchandise is
sold at the retail level, representative
consumer organizations, wishing to
participate in the final phase of this
investigation as parties must file an
entry of appearance with the Secretary
to the Commission, as provided in
§ 201.11 of the Commission’s rules, no
later than 21 days prior to the hearing
date specified in this notice. A party
that filed a notice of appearance during
the preliminary phase of the
investigation need not file an additional
notice of appearance during this final
phase. The Secretary will maintain a
public service list containing the names
and addresses of all persons, or their
representatives, who are parties to the
investigation.
Please note the Secretary’s Office will
accept only electronic filings during this
time. Filings must be made through the
Commission’s Electronic Document
Information System (EDIS, https://
edis.usitc.gov.) No in-person paperbased filings or paper copies of any
electronic filings will be accepted until
further notice.
Limited disclosure of business
proprietary information (BPI) under an
administrative protective order (APO)
and BPI service list.—Pursuant to
§ 207.7(a) of the Commission’s rules, the
Secretary will make BPI gathered in the
final phase of this investigation
available to authorized applicants under
the APO issued in the investigation,
provided that the application is made
no later than 21 days prior to the
hearing date specified in this notice.
Authorized applicants must represent
interested parties, as defined by 19
U.S.C. 1677(9), who are parties to the
investigation. A party granted access to
E:\FR\FM\09SEN1.SGM
09SEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 175 (Wednesday, September 9, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 55687-55688]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-19816]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-1219]
Certain Non-Invasive Aesthetic Body-Contouring Devices,
Components Thereof, and Methods of Using Same; Institution of
Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 5, 2020, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of BTL Industries,
Inc. of Marlborough, Massachusetts. The complaint alleges violations of
section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale
for importation, and the sale within the United States after
importation of certain non-invasive aesthetic body-contouring devices,
components thereof, and methods of using same by reason of infringement
of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 10,632,321 (``the '321 patent'');
U.S. Patent No. 10,695,575 (``the '575 patent''); U.S. Patent No.
10,695,576 (``the '576 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,709,894 (``the
'894 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 10,709,895 (``the '895 patent''); and
U.S. Patent No. 10,478,634 (``the '634 patent''). The complaint further
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the
applicable Federal Statute. The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation,
issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket
Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205-
1802.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is
contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on September 2, 2020, ordered that--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain products
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of
claims 1, 2, 4, 6-8, 10, 12-16, 20, 22, 23, and 26-28 of the '321
patent; claims 1, 9-11, 13, 15, 16, and 20-22 of the '575 patent;
claims 1, 8, 10, 11, 13, 16, 18, 23-25, 27, and 28 of the '576 patent;
claims 1, 2, 4, 5, 9, 10, 12, 13, 17-21, 23, 24, and 26-29 of the '894
patent; claims 1, 2-6, 9, 10, and 14-25 of the '895 patent; and claims
1, 6, 7, 16, 21, and 22 of the '634 patent, and whether an industry in
the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language
description of the accused products or category of accused products,
which defines the scope of the investigation, is: Non-invasive magnetic
and cryolipolysis aesthetic body-contouring products and their
components, including main units, applicators, straps, massagers, gel
traps, and virtual consumables such as treatment cards that enable the
products to administer the pre-programmed treatment protocols;
(3) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: BTL Industries, Inc., 362 Elm Street,
Marlborough, MA 01752.
(b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint
is to be served:
Allergan Limited, Clonshaugh Business and Technology Park, Coolock,
Dublin D17 E400, Ireland
Allergan USA, Inc., 5 Giralda Farms, Madison, New Jersey 07940
Allergan, Inc., 5 Giralda Farms, Madison, New Jersey 07940
Zeltiq Aesthetics, Inc., 4410 Rosewood Dr., Pleasanton, California
94588-3050
Zeltiq Ireland Unlimited Company, Galway West Business Park, Western
Distributor Road, Knocknacarra, Galway H91E8C3, Ireland
Zimmer MedizinSysteme GmbH, Junkersstra[beta]e 9, 89231, Neu-Ulm,
Germany
(4) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
The Office of Unfair Import Investigations will not participate as
a party in this investigation.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the
complainant of the complaint and the notice of investigation.
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor
is shown.
Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the
[[Page 55688]]
Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts
to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an
initial determination and a final determination containing such
findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a
cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: September 2, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-19816 Filed 9-8-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P