Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Orders and Countervailing Duty Order, 52953-52955 [2020-18900]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Notices
52953
LIST OF SEPARATE RATE COMPANIES—Continued
Exporter
Producer
Non-Individually Examined Exporters Receiving Separate Rates
Producers Supplying the Non-Individually-Examined Exporters
Receiving Separate Rates
Icool International (Hong Kong) Limited ...................................................
Icool International (Hong Kong) Limited ...................................................
Icool International (Hong Kong) Limited ...................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Ninhua Group Co., Ltd .............................................................................
Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd .................................................
T.T. International Co., Ltd ........................................................................
T.T. International Co., Ltd ........................................................................
T.T. International Co., Ltd ........................................................................
Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd .................................................
Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd .................................................
Zhejiang Guomao Industrial Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Aohong Chemical Co., Ltd.
Changshu 3F Zhonghao New Chemical Materials Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Zhiyang Chemical Co., Ltd.
Taizhou Huasheng New Refrigeration Material Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Lishui Fuhua Chemical Co., Ltd.
Zibo Feiyuan Chemical Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Meilan Chemical Co., Ltd.
Taizhou Qingsong Refrigerant New Material Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd.
Liaocheng Fuer New Materials Technology Co., Ltd.
Ruyuan Dongyangguang Fluorine Co., Ltd.
Shandong Xinlong Science Technology Co., Ltd.
Linhai Limin Chemicals Co., Ltd.
Dongyang Weihua Refrigerants Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Fulai Refrigerant Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Guomao Industrial Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Yonghe Refrigerant Co., Ltd.
Shanghai Aohong Chemical Co., Ltd.
Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd.
Sinochem Lantian Fluoro Materials Co., Ltd.
Zhejiang Sanmei Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.
Shandong Huaan New Material Co., Ltd.
Jiangsu Sanmei Chemical Ind. Co., Ltd.
Fujian Qingliu Dongying Chemical Co., Ltd.
Applicable August 27, 2020.
[FR Doc. 2020–18811 Filed 8–26–20; 8:45 am]
DATES:
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Benjamin Smith (AD) and Ian Hamilton
(CVD), AD/CVD Operations, Office III,
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
International Trade Administration
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
[A–351–832, C–351–833, A–560–815, A–201– Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
830, A–841–805, A–274–804]
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–2181
and (202) 482–4798, respectively.
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico,
Background
Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago:
Continuation of Antidumping Duty
On October 22, 2002, Commerce
Orders and Countervailing Duty Order
published the CVD order on wire rod
from Brazil.1 On October 29, 2002,
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance,
Commerce published the AD orders on
International Trade Administration,
wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico,
Department of Commerce.
Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago.2 On
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S.
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty
(AD) orders on carbon and certain alloy
steel wire rod (wire rod) from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago and revocation of
the countervailing duty (CVD) order on
wire rod from Brazil would likely lead
to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, countervailable subsidies, and
material injury to an industry in the
United States, Commerce is publishing
a notice of continuation of these AD
orders and the CVD order.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
1 See Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Brazil and Canada, 67 FR 64871 (October 22, 2002).
The CVD order on wire rod from Canada was
revoked on January 23, 2004, pursuant to a changed
circumstances review. See Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances
Review and Revocation of Countervailing Duty
Order, in Whole, 69 FR 3330 (January 23, 2004).
2 See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, Trinidad and Tobago,
and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002). The
AD order on wire rod from Ukraine was revoked,
effective July 30, 2013, as a result of the ITC’s
determination that revocation of the order would
not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury to an industry in the United
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
June 3, 2019, the ITC instituted its
reviews of the AD and CVD orders.3 On
June 4, 2019, Commerce published the
notice of initiation of the sunset reviews
of the AD orders on wire rod from
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago and the CVD order
on wire rod from Brazil, pursuant to
section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).4 As a result of its
reviews, Commerce determined,
pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(c) of the Act, that revocation of the
AD orders on wire rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins of dumping
likely to prevail should the orders be
States. See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Ukraine: Revocation of Antidumping Duty
Order, 79 FR 38009 (July 3, 2014). Subsequently, on
March 14, 2018, Commerce issued the existing AD
order on carbon and alloy steel wire rod from
Ukraine, which is not covered in these sunset
reviews. See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
the Republic of South Africa and Ukraine:
Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR 11175 (March 14,
2018).
3 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago; Institution of Five-Year
Reviews, 84 FR 25564 (June 3, 2019).
4 See Initiation of Five-Year (‘‘Sunset’’) Reviews,
84 FR 25741 (June 4, 2019).
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
52954
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Notices
revoked.5 Commerce also determined,
pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and
752(b) of the Act, that revocation of the
CVD order on wire rod from Brazil
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of countervailable
subsidies and notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the subsidy rates likely to
prevail should the order be revoked.6
On August 21, 2020, the ITC
published its determination, pursuant to
sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act,
that revocation of the AD orders on wire
rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago and
the CVD order on wire rod from Brazil
would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a
reasonably foreseeable time.7
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these
orders is certain hot-rolled products of
carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above-noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and
(e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods.
Also excluded are (f) free machining
steel products (i.e., products that
contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. Grade 1080 tire cord quality rod is
defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or
more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
5 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago: Final Results of the
Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the
Antidumping Duty Orders, 84 FR 53673 (October 8,
2019).
6 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Brazil: Final Results of the Expedited Third
Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 84
FR 53675 (October 8, 2019).
7 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago, 85 FR 51756 (August 21,
2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
having no non-deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
Grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is
defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or
more but not more than 7.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non-deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5
or fewer breaks per ton; and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of soluble aluminum,
(3) 0.040 percent or less, in the
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4)
0.008 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5)
either not more than 0.15 percent, in the
aggregate, of copper, nickel and
chromium (if chromium is not
specified), or not more than 0.10 percent
in the aggregate of copper and nickel
and a chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30
percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod and grade 1080 tire
bead quality wire rod, an inclusion will
be considered to be deformable if its
ratio of length (measured along the
axis—that is, the direction of rolling—
of the rod) over thickness (measured on
the same inclusion in a direction
perpendicular to the axis of the rod) is
equal to or greater than three. The size
of an inclusion for purposes of the 20
microns and 35 microns limitations is
the measurement of the largest
dimension observed on a longitudinal
section measured in a direction
perpendicular to the axis of the rod.
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This measurement methodology applies
only to inclusions on certain grade 1080
tire cord quality wire rod and certain
grade 1080 tire bead quality wire rod
that are entered, or withdrawn from
warehouse, for consumption on or after
July 24, 2003.
The designation of the products as
‘‘tire cord quality’’ or ‘‘tire bead quality’’
indicates the acceptability of the
product for use in the production of tire
cord, tire bead, or wire for use in other
rubber reinforcement applications such
as hose wire. These quality designations
are presumed to indicate that these
products are being used in tire cord, tire
bead, and other rubber reinforcement
applications, and such merchandise
intended for the tire cord, tire bead, or
other rubber reinforcement applications
is not included in the scope. However,
should petitioners or other interested
parties provide a reasonable basis to
believe or suspect that there exists a
pattern of importation of such products
for other than those applications, enduse certification for the importation of
such products may be required. Under
such circumstances, only the importers
of record would normally be required to
certify the end use of the imported
merchandise.
All products meeting the physical
description of subject merchandise that
are not specifically excluded are
included in this scope.
The products under this order are
currently classifiable under subheadings
7213.91.3000, 7213.91.3010,
7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015,
7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3090,
7213.91.3091, 7213.91.3092,
7213.91.3093, 7213.91.4500,
7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590,
7213.91.6000, 7213.91.6010,
7213.91.6090, 7213.99.0030,
7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038,
7213.99.0090, 7227.20.0000,
7227.20.0010, 7227.20.0020,
7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080,
7227.20.0090, 7227.20.0095,
7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020,
7227.90.6050, 7227.90.6051,
7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058,
7227.90.6059, 7227.90.6080, and
7227.90.6085 of the HTSUS. Although
the HTSUS subheadings are provided
for convenience and customs purposes,
the written description of the scope of
this order is dispositive.
On October 1, 2012, Commerce
determined that wire rod with an actual
diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm
produced in Mexico and exported to the
United States by Deacero S.A.P.I. de
C.V. and Deacero USA, Inc.
(collectively, Deacero) was
circumventing the AD order on wire rod
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 167 / Thursday, August 27, 2020 / Notices
from Mexico.8 Specifically, Commerce
determined that Deacero’s shipments to
the United States of such wire rod
constitute merchandise altered in form
or appearance in such minor respects
that it should be included within the
scope of the AD order on wire rod from
Mexico, effective as of December 20,
2011.9 Commerce’s affirmative finding
in the Final Circumvention
Determination I applied solely to
Deacero. The U.S. Court of Appeals for
the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit)
upheld Commerce’s finding in the Final
Circumvention Determination I that
wire rod with an actual diameter of 4.75
mm to 5.00 mm produced in Mexico
and exported to the United States by
Deacero was circumventing the AD
order on wire rod from Mexico.10
On March 13, 2019, Commerce
determined that wire rod with an actual
diameter less than 4.75 mm produced in
Mexico and exported to the United
States by Deacero was circumventing
the AD order on wire rod from
Mexico.11 Specifically, Commerce
determined that Deacero’s shipments to
the United States of such wire rod
constitute merchandise altered in form
or appearance in such minor respects
that it should be included within the
scope of the AD order on wire rod from
Mexico, effective as of February 7,
2018.12 Commerce’s affirmative finding
in the Final Circumvention
Determination II applied solely to
Deacero.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
Commerce and the ITC that revocation
of the AD and CVD orders would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, countervailable subsidies, and
material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the
continuation of the AD orders on wire
rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago and
the CVD order on wire rod from Brazil.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
will continue to collect AD and CVD
8 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Mexico: Affirmative Final Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping Order, 77 FR
59892 (October 1, 2012) (Final Circumvention
Determination I), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum (IDM).
9 Id., 77 FR at 59893.
10 See Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, 817
F. 3d 1332, 1339 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
11 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from Mexico: Final Affirmative Determination of
Circumvention of the Antidumping Duty Order, 84
FR 9089 (March 13, 2019) (Final Circumvention
Determination II), and accompanying IDM.
12 Id., 84 FR at 9090.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:09 Aug 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
cash deposits at the rates in effect at the
time of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise. The effective date of
continuation of these orders will be the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
Commerce intends to initiate the next
five-year reviews of the orders not later
than 30 days prior to the fifth
anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year sunset reviews and
this notice are in accordance with
section 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and
published pursuant to section 777(i)(1)
of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: August 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–18900 Filed 8–26–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration
Notice of Availability of a Record of
Decision
Office for Coastal Management,
National Ocean Service, National
Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration, Department of
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice of availability of a record
of decision.
AGENCY:
The National Oceanic and
Atmospheric Administration’s
(NOAA’s) National Ocean Service (NOS)
announces the availability of the Record
of Decision (ROD) for the Coral Reef
Conservation Program’s (CRCP’s) final
Programmatic Environmental Impact
Statement (PEIS). On August 20, 2020,
the NOS Acting Assistant Administrator
signed the ROD, which constitutes the
agency’s final decision.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Liz
Fairey, NMFS Office of Habitat
Conservation, NOAA Coral Reef
Conservation Program, 1315 East-West
Highway, Silver Spring, MD 20910,
liz.fairey@noaa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July
11, 2018, NOAA published the Notice of
Intent to prepare a PEIS for continued
operation of NOAA’s CRCP. The public
comment period for scoping ended on
August 15, 2018. Three individuals/
organizations submitted comments
during the 35-day scoping period, and
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52955
CRCP considered these comments in the
drafting of the PEIS.
On December 13, 2019, NOAA
published a draft PEIS for coral reef
conservation and restoration activities
conducted by CRCP throughout parts of
the United States, including the South
Atlantic Ocean, Gulf of Mexico, and
Remote Pacific Islands, and priority
international areas (i.e., wider
Caribbean, Coral Triangle, South Pacific,
and Micronesia). The public comment
period for the draft PEIS ended on
January 27, 2020. Thirteen individuals/
organizations submitted comments
during the 45-day comment period.
Appendix I of the final PEIS outlines
how the final PEIS responds to the
comments.
On July 17, 2020, the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) published a
notice of availability of the final PEIS in
the Federal Register (85 FR 43580).
NOAA did as well (85 FR 43544). The
waiting period for the final PEIS ended
on August 17, 2020. The NEPA
implementing regulations at 40 CFR
1506.10 require a minimum 30-day
waiting period between the time the
EPA publishes its Federal Register
notice and the time an agency makes a
decision on the proposed action covered
by the EIS. Except for a supportive letter
from EPA, CRCP did not receive any
comments during the 30-day waiting
period. CRCP has reviewed the final
PEIS and concluded that it fully
analyzes the issues covered by the draft
PEIS and addresses the comments and
suggestions submitted by commenters.
This notice advises the public that the
30-day waiting period has elapsed and
that the ROD is available, documenting
CRCP’s decision to select and
implement the No Action Alternative.
Electronic copies of the PEIS and the
ROD are available at https://
coralreef.noaa.gov/about/envirocompliance.html and https://
coast.noaa.gov/czm/compliance/. The
preparation of the ROD was conducted
in accordance with the requirements of
NEPA, the Council on Environmental
Quality’s Regulations (40 CFR parts
1500–1508), and NOAA’s NEPAimplementing policies and procedures.
Dated: August 21, 2020.
Keelin Kuipers,
Deputy Director, Office for Coastal
Management, National Ocean Service,
National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2020–18798 Filed 8–26–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–22–P
E:\FR\FM\27AUN1.SGM
27AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 167 (Thursday, August 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52953-52955]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18900]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-351-832, C-351-833, A-560-815, A-201-830, A-841-805, A-274-804]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia,
Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago: Continuation of Antidumping
Duty Orders and Countervailing Duty Order
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on carbon and
certain alloy steel wire rod (wire rod) from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico,
Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago and revocation of the countervailing
duty (CVD) order on wire rod from Brazil would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and
material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is
publishing a notice of continuation of these AD orders and the CVD
order.
DATES: Applicable August 27, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin Smith (AD) and Ian Hamilton
(CVD), AD/CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2181
and (202) 482-4798, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On October 22, 2002, Commerce published the CVD order on wire rod
from Brazil.\1\ On October 29, 2002, Commerce published the AD orders
on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and
Tobago.\2\ On June 3, 2019, the ITC instituted its reviews of the AD
and CVD orders.\3\ On June 4, 2019, Commerce published the notice of
initiation of the sunset reviews of the AD orders on wire rod from
Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago and the CVD
order on wire rod from Brazil, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).\4\ As a result of its reviews,
Commerce determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c) of the
Act, that revocation of the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping and notified the ITC of
the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail should the
orders be
[[Page 52954]]
revoked.\5\ Commerce also determined, pursuant to sections 751(c)(1)
and 752(b) of the Act, that revocation of the CVD order on wire rod
from Brazil would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of
countervailable subsidies and notified the ITC of the magnitude of the
subsidy rates likely to prevail should the order be revoked.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Notice of Countervailing Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil and Canada, 67 FR 64871 (October
22, 2002). The CVD order on wire rod from Canada was revoked on
January 23, 2004, pursuant to a changed circumstances review. See
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada: Final Results
of Countervailing Duty Changed Circumstances Review and Revocation
of Countervailing Duty Order, in Whole, 69 FR 3330 (January 23,
2004).
\2\ See Notice of Antidumping Duty Orders: Carbon and Certain
Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova,
Trinidad and Tobago, and Ukraine, 67 FR 65945 (October 29, 2002).
The AD order on wire rod from Ukraine was revoked, effective July
30, 2013, as a result of the ITC's determination that revocation of
the order would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence
of material injury to an industry in the United States. See Carbon
and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Ukraine: Revocation of
Antidumping Duty Order, 79 FR 38009 (July 3, 2014). Subsequently, on
March 14, 2018, Commerce issued the existing AD order on carbon and
alloy steel wire rod from Ukraine, which is not covered in these
sunset reviews. See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the
Republic of South Africa and Ukraine: Antidumping Duty Orders, 83 FR
11175 (March 14, 2018).
\3\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago; Institution of
Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 25564 (June 3, 2019).
\4\ See Initiation of Five-Year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 84 FR
25741 (June 4, 2019).
\5\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago: Final Results
of the Expedited Third Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty
Orders, 84 FR 53673 (October 8, 2019).
\6\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil:
Final Results of the Expedited Third Sunset Review of the
Countervailing Duty Order, 84 FR 53675 (October 8, 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 21, 2020, the ITC published its determination, pursuant
to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD
orders on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and
Trinidad and Tobago and the CVD order on wire rod from Brazil would be
likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an
industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Brazil,
Indonesia, Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago, 85 FR 51756
(August 21, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to these orders is certain hot-rolled
products of carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately
round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid
cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel products possessing the above-noted
physical characteristics and meeting the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (HTSUS) definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool
steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and (e) concrete
reinforcing bars and rods. Also excluded are (f) free machining steel
products (i.e., products that contain by weight one or more of the
following elements: 0.03 percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent or more
of bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of
phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or more than 0.01
percent of tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are 1080 grade tire cord quality wire
rod and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire rod. Grade 1080 tire cord
quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod
measuring 5.0 mm or more but not more than 6.0 mm in cross-sectional
diameter; (ii) with an average partial decarburization of no more than
70 microns in depth (maximum individual 200 microns); (iii) having no
non-deformable inclusions greater than 20 microns and no deformable
inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv) having a carbon segregation
per heat average of 3.0 or better using European Method NFA 04-114; (v)
having a surface quality with no surface defects of a length greater
than 0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to a diameter of 0.30 mm or
less with 3 or fewer breaks per ton, and (vii) containing by weight the
following elements in the proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more
of carbon, (2) less than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or
less, in the aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006 percent or
less of nitrogen, and (5) not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
Grade 1080 tire bead quality rod is defined as: (i) Grade 1080 tire
bead quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or more but not more than 7.0 mm
in cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an average partial
decarburization of no more than 70 microns in depth (maximum individual
200 microns); (iii) having no non-deformable inclusions greater than 20
microns and no deformable inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv)
having a carbon segregation per heat average of 3.0 or better using
European Method NFA 04-114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than 0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being
drawn to a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5 or fewer breaks per
ton; and (vii) containing by weight the following elements in the
proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less than
0.01 percent of soluble aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or less, in the
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.008 percent or less of
nitrogen, and (5) either not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium (if chromium is not specified), or not
more than 0.10 percent in the aggregate of copper and nickel and a
chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30 percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod and grade
1080 tire bead quality wire rod, an inclusion will be considered to be
deformable if its ratio of length (measured along the axis--that is,
the direction of rolling--of the rod) over thickness (measured on the
same inclusion in a direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod) is
equal to or greater than three. The size of an inclusion for purposes
of the 20 microns and 35 microns limitations is the measurement of the
largest dimension observed on a longitudinal section measured in a
direction perpendicular to the axis of the rod. This measurement
methodology applies only to inclusions on certain grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod and certain grade 1080 tire bead quality wire rod that
are entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after
July 24, 2003.
The designation of the products as ``tire cord quality'' or ``tire
bead quality'' indicates the acceptability of the product for use in
the production of tire cord, tire bead, or wire for use in other rubber
reinforcement applications such as hose wire. These quality
designations are presumed to indicate that these products are being
used in tire cord, tire bead, and other rubber reinforcement
applications, and such merchandise intended for the tire cord, tire
bead, or other rubber reinforcement applications is not included in the
scope. However, should petitioners or other interested parties provide
a reasonable basis to believe or suspect that there exists a pattern of
importation of such products for other than those applications, end-use
certification for the importation of such products may be required.
Under such circumstances, only the importers of record would normally
be required to certify the end use of the imported merchandise.
All products meeting the physical description of subject
merchandise that are not specifically excluded are included in this
scope.
The products under this order are currently classifiable under
subheadings 7213.91.3000, 7213.91.3010, 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015,
7213.91.3020, 7213.91.3090, 7213.91.3091, 7213.91.3092, 7213.91.3093,
7213.91.4500, 7213.91.4510, 7213.91.4590, 7213.91.6000, 7213.91.6010,
7213.91.6090, 7213.99.0030, 7213.99.0031, 7213.99.0038, 7213.99.0090,
7227.20.0000, 7227.20.0010, 7227.20.0020, 7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080,
7227.20.0090, 7227.20.0095, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6050,
7227.90.6051, 7227.90.6053, 7227.90.6058, 7227.90.6059, 7227.90.6080,
and 7227.90.6085 of the HTSUS. Although the HTSUS subheadings are
provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description
of the scope of this order is dispositive.
On October 1, 2012, Commerce determined that wire rod with an
actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm produced in Mexico and exported
to the United States by Deacero S.A.P.I. de C.V. and Deacero USA, Inc.
(collectively, Deacero) was circumventing the AD order on wire rod
[[Page 52955]]
from Mexico.\8\ Specifically, Commerce determined that Deacero's
shipments to the United States of such wire rod constitute merchandise
altered in form or appearance in such minor respects that it should be
included within the scope of the AD order on wire rod from Mexico,
effective as of December 20, 2011.\9\ Commerce's affirmative finding in
the Final Circumvention Determination I applied solely to Deacero. The
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (Federal Circuit) upheld
Commerce's finding in the Final Circumvention Determination I that wire
rod with an actual diameter of 4.75 mm to 5.00 mm produced in Mexico
and exported to the United States by Deacero was circumventing the AD
order on wire rod from Mexico.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico:
Affirmative Final Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping
Order, 77 FR 59892 (October 1, 2012) (Final Circumvention
Determination I), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum
(IDM).
\9\ Id., 77 FR at 59893.
\10\ See Deacero S.A. de C.V. v. United States, 817 F. 3d 1332,
1339 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On March 13, 2019, Commerce determined that wire rod with an actual
diameter less than 4.75 mm produced in Mexico and exported to the
United States by Deacero was circumventing the AD order on wire rod
from Mexico.\11\ Specifically, Commerce determined that Deacero's
shipments to the United States of such wire rod constitute merchandise
altered in form or appearance in such minor respects that it should be
included within the scope of the AD order on wire rod from Mexico,
effective as of February 7, 2018.\12\ Commerce's affirmative finding in
the Final Circumvention Determination II applied solely to Deacero.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Mexico:
Final Affirmative Determination of Circumvention of the Antidumping
Duty Order, 84 FR 9089 (March 13, 2019) (Final Circumvention
Determination II), and accompanying IDM.
\12\ Id., 84 FR at 9090.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that
revocation of the AD and CVD orders would likely lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material
injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the
continuation of the AD orders on wire rod from Brazil, Indonesia,
Mexico, Moldova, and Trinidad and Tobago and the CVD order on wire rod
from Brazil.
U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD and
CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all
imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of continuation of
these orders will be the date of publication in the Federal Register of
this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act,
Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of the orders
not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective
date of continuation.
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year sunset reviews and this notice are in accordance
with section 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and published pursuant to
section 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: August 21, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-18900 Filed 8-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P