Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Exchange's Parent Corporation, Cboe Global Markets, Inc., 51132-51138 [2020-18096]
Download as PDF
51132
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89542; File No. SR–
CboeEDGX–2020–037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
the Fifth Amended and Restated
Bylaws of the Exchange’s Parent
Corporation, Cboe Global Markets, Inc.
August 13, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 30,
2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I, II, and
III below, which Items have been
prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘EDGX’’) proposes to
amend the Fifth Amended and Restated
Bylaws (the ‘‘Parent Bylaws’’) of its
parent corporation, Cboe Global
Markets, Inc. (‘‘Cboe’’ or the ‘‘Parent’’).
The text of the proposed amendments to
the Parent Bylaws is provided in Exhibit
5.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/
options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/),
at the Exchange’s Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
1 15
2 17
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
1. Purpose
The proposed rule change amends the
Parent Bylaws to improve the
governance processes of Cboe, which is
organized under the laws of the State of
Delaware, and to make certain
provisions more consistent with the
Delaware General Corporation Law
(‘‘DGCL’’). The proposed rule change
also makes clarifying and cleanup
changes to the Parent Bylaws.
Proposed Changes to Article 2—
Stockholders
The majority of the proposed changes
are being made to amend Section 2.11
(Nomination of Directors) and Section
2.12 (Notice of Business at Annual
Meetings) and are generally designed to
provide the Board with the most
information and advance notice possible
in connection with business and
nominations at annual and special
meetings. Additionally, the Exchange
notes the proposed changes reflect the
most up-to-date disclosure requirement
practices. The proposed changes also
combine the existing separate
provisions for director nominations and
stockholder proposals into one
provision. Particularly, the proposed
rule change combines current Sections
2.11 and 2.12 into one provision:
Proposed Section 2.11 titled ‘‘Notice of
Business and Nomination of Directors at
Meetings of Stockholders.’’ 3
Specifically, the proposed rule change
delineates proposed Section 2.11 into
paragraph (a) governing notice
requirements for annual meetings,
paragraph (b) governing notice
requirements for special meetings,4 and
paragraph (c), which provides for other
general procedures and practices in
connection with notices. The proposed
delineation does not alter the process or
definition of either type of meeting, but
instead provides for significantly more
detailed written notice requirements as
well as updates to the manner and
timeliness of notices.
First, the proposed change to Section
2.11(a)(i) relocates the provisions
regarding ‘‘properly brought’’ business
from current Section 2.12, and
streamlines such provisions to clearly
state that the only business that will be
conducted at an annual meeting of the
3 The proposed rule change also updates the
subsequent section numbering (current 2.13
through 2.16) to reflect this change (proposed 2.12
through 2.15).
4 See Section 2.3 of the Parent Bylaws for a
description of Special Meetings.
PO 00000
Frm 00126
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
stockholders is business that has
properly been brought before the
meeting and specifies to be ‘‘properly
brought’’ such business must be
included in the Corporation’s notice of
the meeting and brought pursuant to
Rule 14a–8 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, (the ‘‘Exchange
Act’’) (or any successor provision of
law) and included in the Corporation’s
properly brought business. It also
proposes to specify the a precise time
that the notices must be made by (i.e.,
delivered to or mailed and received by
the Secretary of the Corporation), which
is not later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
on the 90th day nor earlier than the
120th day (which are the time frames
currently in place) prior to such annual
meeting.
Next, the proposed rule change adds
greater detail regarding the requirements
for proper written notice. Particularly,
for notice for stockholder proposals for
business other than nominations,
(proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(A)), the
proposed rule change provides that such
notice must essentially set forth the
same information that would be
disclosed in a proxy statement,
including:
• A reasonably brief description of
the business desired to be brought
before the meeting; the text of the
proposal or business (including the text
of any resolutions proposed for
consideration and, in the event that
such business includes a proposal to
amend the Certificate of Incorporation
or the Bylaws of the Corporation, the
language of the proposed amendment);
• the reasons for conducting such
business at the meeting; a complete and
accurate description of any material
interest in such business of such
stockholder and any Stockholder
Associated Person, individually or in
the aggregate, including any anticipated
benefit to the stockholder and any
Stockholder Associated Person
therefrom; and
• all other information relating to
such proposed business that would be
required to be disclosed in a proxy
statement or other filing required to be
made by the stockholder or any
Stockholder Associated Person in
connection with the solicitation of
proxies in support of such proposed
business pursuant to Regulation 14A
under the Exchange Act.
Regarding proposed proper written
notice for director nominations
(proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(B)), the
notice must include:
• The name, age, business address
and residence address of such nominee,
(‘‘Proposed Nominee’’) (which, the
Exchange notes is currently the case);
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
• the principal occupation or
employment of such nominee (which,
the Exchange notes is currently the case)
• a completed written questionnaire
with respect to the background and
qualifications of such Proposed
Nominee, which must be completed in
a form required by the Corporation and
provided to such stockholder within ten
days of receiving such request;
• the Proposed Nominee’s executed
written consent to being named in the
proxy statement for the meeting as a
director nominee;
• the Proposed Nominee’s completed
written representation and agreement,
which must be completed in a form
required by the Corporation and
provided to such stockholder within ten
days of receiving such request.
Importantly, the Proposed Nominee
must represent and agree (1) to a
‘‘Voting Commitment’’ that the
Proposed Nominee is not and will not
become party to any agreement,
arrangement or understanding with, and
has not given any commitment or
assurance to, any person or entity as to
how such Proposed Nominee, if elected
as a director, will act or vote on any
issue or question (that has not been
disclosed to the Corporation). or any
Voting Commitment that could limit or
interfere with the Proposed Nominee’s
ability to comply with fiduciary duties
under applicable law, (2) that the
Proposed Nominee is not and will not
become a party to any agreement,
arrangement, or understanding with any
person or entity other than the
Corporation with respect to any direct
or indirect compensation,
reimbursement, or indemnification in
connection with service or action as a
director that has not been disclosed to
the Corporation, (3) would comply with
all applicable rules of the exchange and
Corporation and fiduciary duties under
state law, (4) would comply with certain
Articles of Incorporation with respect to
activities related to any of the
Exchanges, (5) intends to serve a full
term if elected, and (6) will provide true
and correct information in
communications to the Corporation and
its stockholders and will not omit
material information or provide
misleading information;
• a description of all direct and
indirect compensation and other
material monetary agreements,
arrangements and understandings
during the past three years, and any
other material relationships; and
• any other information that would be
required to be disclosed statement or
other filing required to be made in
connection with solicitations of proxies
for election of directors in a contested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
election pursuant to Section 14 of the
Exchange Act (which, the Exchange
notes is currently the case).
As to the stockholder providing
notice, any Stockholder Associated
Person and any Proposed Nominee,
(proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(C)) the
proposed proper written notice must
provide:
• Name and address of such person
(as they appear on the Corporation’s
books, if applicable) (which, the
Exchange notes is currently the case);
• class (which is currently the case)
or series and number of shares of capital
stock of the Corporation (‘‘Shares’’)
which are, directly or indirectly, owned
beneficially and/or of record by such
person, the dates such shares were
acquired and the investment intent of
such acquisition;
• the name of each nominee holder
for, and any pledge by such person or
any number of, securities of the
Corporation owned beneficially, but not
of record;
• short interest, including a definition
of what constitutes short interest,
wherein a person shall be deemed to
have a short interest in a security if such
person, directly or indirectly, through
any contract, arrangement,
understanding, or relationship or
otherwise has an opportunity to profit
or share in profit derived from
decreased value of the subject security;
• a description of any agreement,
arrangement or understanding, whether
written or oral, (including any
derivative or short positions, profit
interests, options, warrants, convertible
securities, stock appreciation or similar
rights, hedging transactions, and
borrowed or loaned shares (which, the
Exchange notes, is currently the case) or
similar rights with an exercise or
conversion privilege or a settlement
payment or mechanism at a price
related to any class or series of capital
stock of the Corporation or with a value
derived in whole or in part from the
value of any class or series of capital
stock of the Corporation (a ‘‘Derivative
Instrument’’)), in order to mitigate loss
to, manage risk or benefit of share price
changes for, or increase or decrease
voting power with respect to Shares;
• any rights to dividends on the
Shares owned beneficially by such
person;
• any proportionate interest 5 in
Shares or Derivative Instruments by a
general or limited partnership or similar
entity in which such person (1) is a
general partner or beneficially owns an
5 Interest referred to throughout the proposed
stockholder proper written notice may be direct or
indirect.
PO 00000
Frm 00127
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51133
interest in a general partner, or (2) is the
manager, managing member, or
beneficially owns an interest in such
management, of a limited liability
company or similar entity;
• any substantial interest (including,
without limitation, any existing or
prospective commercial, business or
contractual relationship with the
Corporation), by security holdings or
otherwise, in the Corporation or any of
its affiliates;
• a complete and accurate description
of all agreements, arrangements or
understandings, written or oral, and
formal or informal, between or among
the stockholder providing notice and
any of the Stockholder Associated
Persons (collectively, the
‘‘Stockholders’’), or the Stockholders
with any Proposed Nominee and any
other person in connection with (1) any
proxy, contract, arrangement,
understanding or relationship where
either of the Stockholders have the right
to vote any Shares, (2) that such
individuals may have reached with any
stockholder of the Corporation regarding
how such stockholder will vote its
shares, take other action in support of
any Proposed Nominee, or other action
by either of the Stockholders, and (3)
any other agreements that would be
required to be disclosed by either of the
Stockholders or any other person or
entity pursuant to a Schedule 13D filed
pursuant to the Exchange Act
• a complete and accurate description
of any performance-related fees to
which such person may be entitled as a
result of any increase or decrease in the
value of Shares or any Derivative
Instruments;
• any investment strategy or objective
of those who are not an individual and
a copy of the prospectus (and other like
documents);
• a complete and accurate description
of any pending or threatened legal
proceeding in which such person is a
party or participant involving the
Corporation;
• if any agreement, arrangement or
understanding has been made to
increase or decrease the voting power of
such person with respect to any Shares;
and
• any other information relating to
such person that would be required to
be disclosed in a proxy statement or
other filing required to be made in
connection with solicitations of proxies
for such business or the election of any
Proposed Nominee, or is otherwise
required, pursuant to Section 14 of the
Exchange Act.
Further, regarding proposed proper
written notice, proposed Section
2.11(a)(iii)(D) simplifies the language in
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
51134
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
connection with the current
requirement that the Stockholders must
represent if they intend to deliver a
proxy statement and/or form of proxy to
holders to approve or adopt the
proposed business, elect the Proposed
Nominee, and/or otherwise solicit
proxies or votes from stockholders in
support of such proposed business or
Proposed Nominee, making it easier to
understand.
Proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(E)
provides for the current requirement
that the stockholder providing notice
must represent that it is a holder of
record of stock of the Corporation
entitled to vote at such meeting and
intends to appear in person, and adds
that ‘‘in person’’ may be virtually, in the
case of a meeting held solely by means
of remote communication) or by proxy
at the meeting to bring such proposed
business and/or nominate one or more
Proposed Nominee.
Proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(F)
requires that proper written notice
include an acknowledgment that the
Corporation does not have to present the
business or nomination being brought at
the meeting by the stockholder
proposing such, if such stockholder
does not appear. The proposed rule
change also adds that, in addition to the
proper written notice information, the
Corporation may require any Proposed
Nominee to furnish certain other
information as the Corporation may
reasonably require to determine the
eligibility or independence of a
Proposed Nominee.
Proposed Section 2.11(b), which, as
stated, delineates the provisions
governing special meetings of
stockholders, amends the procedures
governing advance notice of director
nominations at a special meeting called
by the Board for the election of
directors. Currently, notices of a special
meeting must be made not less than
ninety (90) days nor more than one
hundred twenty (120) days prior to the
anniversary date of the immediately
preceding annual meeting of
stockholders; provided, however, that if
the annual meeting is not held within
thirty (30) days before or more than
seventy (70) days after such anniversary
date, then such nomination shall have
been delivered to or mailed and
received by the Secretary not later than
the close of business on the 10th day
following the date on which public
announcement of the annual meeting
date was made. The proposed rule
change updates this notice procedure to
mirror the same procedural language in
proposed Section 2.11(a)(ii)
(maintaining the same 90- to 120-day
notice requirement), but updates the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
timing requirements to remove the
language regarding the 30-day and 70day time frames around the anniversary
date and provides that, if public
announcement of the special meeting
and the nominees proposed by the
Board of Directors to be elected at such
meeting is first made less than ninety
(90) days prior to the date of the special
meeting, notice must be made the tenth
(10th) day following the day on which
such public announcement is first
made. The Exchange believes this
proposed timing provision simplifies
the timing requirement, making it easier
to understand and follow, and also
provides ample time to provide notice
in advance to stockholders of any
scheduled special meeting. Proposed
Section 2.11(b) also provides that proper
written notice of a special meeting must
comply with the requirements, as
proposed, laid out in Section 2.11(a)(iii).
Proposed Section 2.11(c) provides,
generally, for other procedures and
practices in connection with notices, as
well as certain defined terms. Proposed
Section 2.11(c)(i) provides that a
stockholder providing notice must
update any notice, if necessary, so that
the information provided or required to
be provided in a notice is be true and
correct (A) as of the record date for
determining the stockholders entitled to
receive notice of the meeting and (B) as
of the date that is ten business days
prior to the meeting (or any
postponement, adjournment or recess
thereof). If an update is required to be
made as of the record date for
determining the stockholders entitled to
receive notice of the meeting then the
notice of update must be made not later
than five business days after the record
date for determining the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of such
meeting. If an update is required to be
made as of the date that is ten business
days prior to the meeting (or any
postponement, adjournment or recess
thereof), then the notice of update must
be made no later than seven business
days prior to the date for the meeting,
if practicable, or, if not practicable, on
the first practicable date prior to the
meeting or any adjournment, recess or
postponement thereof Proposed Section
2.11(c)(ii) provides that if any
information submitted pursuant to
Section 2.11 is inaccurate in any
respect, such information may be
deemed not to have been provided in
accordance with the Parent Bylaws. As
proposed, the stockholder providing the
notice has an obligation to notify the
Secretary in writing at the principal
executive offices of the Corporation of
any inaccuracy or change in any such
PO 00000
Frm 00128
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
information within two business days of
becoming aware of such inaccuracy or
change. Additionally, within seven days
upon delivery of a written request by
the Secretary, the Board of Directors (or
a duly authorized committee thereof),
any such stockholder is obliged to
provide: (A) Written verification,
reasonably satisfactory to the Board of
Directors, any committee thereof or any
authorized officer of the Corporation, to
demonstrate the accuracy of any
information submitted by the
stockholder pursuant to Section 2.11,
and (B) a written update of any
information pursuant to Section 2.11 as
of an earlier date. If the stockholder fails
to provide such written verification
within such period, the information as
to which written verification was
requested may be deemed not to have
been provided in accordance with
Section 2.11. Proposed Section
2.11(c)(iii) provides that a stockholder
providing notice must also comply with
all applicable requirements of state law
and all applicable requirements of the
Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations thereunder, however,
references to the Exchange Act and its
rules and regulations will not limit the
requirements applicable to stockholder
proposals or director nominations
pursuant to Section 2.11. Proposed
Section 2.11(c)(iv) updates current
language governing failure for the
proposing stockholder to appear by
adding that virtual appearances are
acceptable when such meeting is being
held remotely, as well as the flexibility
for the Corporation to waive the
appearance requirement. The rule
change updates this provision and adds
this flexibility in light of the ongoing
Covid–19 pandemic and the
consequential remote working status for
many companies, including Cboe.
Proposed Section 2.11(c)(v) adds the
definition of key terms, along with
current definitions, for clarity.
Specifically, the proposed rule change
defines an ‘‘affiliate’’ and ‘‘associate’’ as
having the respective meanings set forth
in Rule 12b–2 under the Exchange Act
and ‘‘Stockholder Associated Person’’ to
mean: any person who is a member of
a ‘‘group’’ (used in Rule 13d–5 under
the Exchange Act) with or otherwise
acting in concert with such stockholder
providing notice; any beneficial owner
of shares of stock of the Corporation
owned of record or beneficially by such
stockholder (other than a stockholder
that is a depositary); any person that
directly, or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, controls, or is
controlled by, or is under common
control with, such stockholder or such
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Stockholder Associated Person and
beneficially owns, directly or indirectly,
shares of stock of the Corporation; any
person that directly, or indirectly
through one or more intermediaries,
controls such stockholder or any
Stockholder Associated Person; and any
participant (as defined in paragraphs
(a)(ii)–(vi) of Instruction 3 to Item 4 of
Schedule 14A, or any successor
instructions) with such stockholder or
other Stockholder Associated Person in
respect of any proposals or nominations,
as applicable.
The Exchange notes that many of the
proposed rule changes to proposed
Section 2.11 are consistent with the
bylaws of Cboe’s peer financial market/
services corporations, Nasdaq, Inc
(‘‘Nasdaq’’),6 Intercontinental Exchange
(‘‘ICE’’),7 and/or the CME Group, Inc.
(‘‘CME’’),8 including:
• The proposed disclosures required
under Regulation 14A for proposed
business other than director
nominations; director questionnaires;
• consent to be named in the proxy
statement as a director nominee;
• a Voting Commitment;
• disclosure of compensation
arrangements in connection with service
as a director;
• agreement to comply with
applicable regulations, organizational
documents and policies;
• representation of intent to serve a
full term; commitment to provide true
and correct facts and to not omit
material facts;
• nominee disclosures for contested
elections under Section 14;
• required disclosure by a proposing
stockholder’s 13D group members and
related parties;
• disclosure of rights to dividends,
short interest, interests held through
controlled partnerships or LLCs, and in
the Company other than Company
common stock;
• disclosure of agreements/
arrangements in connection with
conferring proxy authority, with any
other stockholder regarding voting or
supporting the proposal/nominee, with
increasing or decreasing voting power,
and agreements required to be disclosed
on Schedule 13D;
6 See By-laws of Nasdaq, Inc., available at https://
listingcenter.nasdaq.com/assets/RuleBook/
NASDAQ/rules/Nasdaq_Inc_Corporate_
Organization_Nasdaq_Inc.pdf.
7 See Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of
Intercontinental Exchange, Inc., available at https://
s2.q4cdn.com/154085107/files/doc_downloads/
intercontinental_exchange/bylaws-eighthamended.pdf.
8 See Fifteenth Amended and Restated Bylaws of
CME Group Inc., available at https://
www.cmegroup.com/rulebook/files/CMEBylaws.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
• disclosure of performance-related
fees related to the Company’s
performance;
• disclosure of investment strategy
and inclusion of prospectus/offering
memorandum;
• disclosure of pending or threatened
litigation;
• Special meeting provisions;
• Obligation to update and correct
disclosures; and
• Express obligation to appear to
present the proposal/nominee.
Additionally, the proposed rule
change moves language currently in
Section 2.10 providing that the number
of nominees for director may not exceed
the number of directors to be elected at
any meeting to proposed Section 2.11(a)
(annual meetings) and Section 2.11(b)
(special meetings), therefore adding
clarity to the updated Section 2.11
format that this provision continues to
apply for both annual and special
meetings. The proposed rule change to
Section 2.10 also simplifies current
language that provides an election may
proceed if proper notice is made and
received and adds language that
nominations may be withdrawn on or
prior to the tenth day before the date the
Corporation first mails its notice of
meeting for such election.
The proposed rule change also
amends Section 2.1 (Place of Meetings)
by removing language that requires
stockholder meetings to be held at the
principal place of business of the
Company if no location is designated.
The Exchange believes that it is
appropriate for the Board to retain both
control and flexibility over the location
and timing of stockholder meetings. The
proposed rule change amends Section
2.2 (Annual Meeting) and Section 2.3
(Special Meeting) to provide that the
Board may postpone, reschedule or
cancel any previously-scheduled annual
meeting or special meeting,
respectively. The proposed rule change
also updates Section 2.7 (Adjournments)
to provide that only the presiding
person of a stockholder meeting can
adjourn the meeting in the absence of a
quorum. The proposed changes are
intended to provide the Board the
flexibility to postpone, recess,
reschedule or cancel a stockholder
meeting. The Exchange also notes that
the proposed rule changes to Sections
2.2, 2.3, and 2.7 are consistent with the
bylaws of Cboe’s peer corporation,
Nasdaq.9
The proposed rule change also makes
updates to reflect the current best
corporate governance practices to
certain Sections under Article 2. In
9 See
PO 00000
supra note 6.
Frm 00129
Fmt 4703
particular, it updates the language in
Section 2.5 (Voting List) regarding who
is required to prepare the voting list.
Section 2.5 currently provides that
officer who has charge of the stock
ledger prepares the voting list and the
proposed rule change updates this to
provide that the Corporation prepares
the voting list. The proposed rule
change is consistent with the DGCL and
reflects current best practice. The
proposed rule change also amends
current Section 2.13 (Organization)
(proposed Section 2.12), which
currently states that that the Board of
Directors may appoint any stockholder
to act as chairman of any meeting in the
absence of the Chairman of the Board,
to instead provide that that the Board of
Directors may appoint any director of
the Corporation to act as chairman of
any meeting in the absence of the
Chairman of the Board. Also, current
Section 2.16 (Conduct of Meetings)
(proposed Section 2.15) makes certain
changes to expand the procedural
authority of the presiding officer of any
stockholder meeting, including the right
to recess and/or adjourn meetings for
any or no reason, and the determination
of when the polls will open and close
for any given matter to be voted on at
the meeting, the removal of any
stockholder or individual who refuses to
comply with meeting procedures, rules,
or guidelines, the restrictions on the use
of audio and/or video recording devices
and cell phones. This is consistent with
best practice and ensures that the
presiding officer has the flexibility to
take measures, as needed, that ensure
meetings are conducted in the most
appropriate manner.
Proposed Changes to Article 3—
Directors
The proposed rule change amends
Section 3.5 (Vacancies) to provide that
that vacancies on the Board may be
filled exclusively by a majority of the
directors. The Exchange notes that
stockholders have a common law right
under Delaware law to fill director
vacancies, unless the Company’s
Charter or Bylaws explicitly give the
Board exclusive authority, therefore, the
proposed change is designed to make
this right exclusive to the Board. The
proposed rule change is consistent with
the bylaws of Cboe’s peer corporations,
Nasdaq and ICE.10 The proposed rule
change to Section 3.10 (Special
Meetings) would allow special meetings
of the Board to be called with less than
24 hours’ notice. Currently, Section 3.10
requires at least 24 hours’ notice to
directors of special Board meetings.
10 See
Sfmt 4703
51135
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
supra notes 6 and 7.
19AUN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
51136
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
However, there may be circumstances
that necessitate an emergency meeting
of the Board with less than 24 hours’
notice (e.g., in relation to a pending
transaction), and therefore, the proposed
changes would allow notice on a shorter
time frame if necessary and appropriate
under the circumstances. The proposed
changes to Section 3.13 (Action by
Consent) updates language regarding
routine filing of consents following an
action by the Board. Specifically, the
proposed change updates the consents
to reflect the same electronic form as
minutes are maintained, which is
consistent with recent amendments to
the DGCL, reflects current best practice.
The proposed change also adds
Section 3.15 (Emergency Bylaws).
Specifically, the proposed Section 3.15
provides that, notwithstanding anything
to the contrary in the Certificate of
Incorporation or these Bylaws, in the
event there is any emergency, disaster or
catastrophe, as referred to in Section
110 of the DGCL, or other similar
emergency condition (each, an
‘‘emergency’’), and a quorum of the
Board of Directors cannot readily be
convened for action, this Section 3.15
shall apply., including:
• Any director or Chief Executive
Officer, President, Chief Operating
Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
Treasurer or Secretary of the
Corporation may call a meeting of the
Board of Directors by any feasible means
and with such advance notice as
circumstances permit in the judgment of
the person calling the meeting. Neither
the business to be transacted nor the
purpose of any such meeting need be
specified in the notice thereof.
• One-third (1⁄3) of the directors shall
constitute a quorum, which may in all
cases act by majority vote.
• Directors may take action to appoint
one or more of the director or directors
to membership on any standing or
temporary committees of the Board of
Directors as they deem advisable.
Directors may also take action to
designate one or more of the officers of
the Corporation to serve as directors of
the Corporation while this Section 3.15
applies.
• To the extent that it considers it
practical to do so, the Board of Directors
shall manage the business of the
Corporation during an emergency in a
manner that is consistent with the
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws.
It is recognized, however, that in an
emergency it may not always be
practical to act in this manner and this
Section 3.15 is intended to and does
hereby empower the Board of Directors
with the maximum authority possible
under the DGCL, and all other
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
applicable law, to conduct the interim
management of the affairs of the
Corporation in an emergency in what it
considers to be in the best interests of
the Corporation.
• No director, officer or employee
acting in good faith in accordance with
this Section 3.15 or otherwise pursuant
to Section 110 of the DGCL shall be
liable except for willful misconduct.
• This Section 3.15 shall continue to
apply until such time following the
emergency when it is feasible for at least
a majority of the directors of the
Corporation immediately prior to the
emergency to resume management of
the business of the Corporation.
• The Board of Directors may modify,
amend or add to the provisions of this
Section 3.15 in order to make any
provision that may be practical or
necessary given the circumstances of the
emergency.
• The provisions of this Section 3.15
shall be subject to repeal or change by
further action of the Board of Directors
or by action of the stockholders, but no
such repeal or change shall modify the
provisions of paragraph (e) of this
Section 3.15 with regard to action taken
prior to the time of such repeal or
change.
The Exchange notes that these
proposed changes are largely consistent
with the DGCL and are designed to
allow the Board and the Corporation to
continue to function in the case of an
emergency, such as a pandemic or an
act of terrorism. The Exchange believes
the ongoing COVID–19 pandemic, as
well as similar potential events,
demonstrate the need for Emergency
Bylaws and notes that a number of
companies are adopting (or at least
considering) emergency bylaws to relax
Board requirements when directors may
be unavailable due to emergency
conditions, such as the pandemic.
Proposed Changes to Article 4—
Committees
The proposed rule change to Section
4.1 (Designation of Committees) adds
language that provides the Board with
additional rights in their ability to
designate committees and committee
alternates and specifies that such
committees may exercise all powers and
authority of the Board in the
management of the business.
Specifically, the proposed language
provides that the Board of Directors may
designate one or more committees, each
committee to consist of one or more of
the directors of the Corporation. The
Board of Directors may designate one or
more directors as alternate members of
any committee, who may replace any
absent or disqualified member at any
PO 00000
Frm 00130
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
meeting of the committee. In the
absence or disqualification of a member
of the committee, the member or
members thereof present at any meeting
and not disqualified from voting,
whether or not he, she or they constitute
a quorum, may unanimously appoint
another member of the Board of
Directors to act at the meeting in place
of any such absent or disqualified
member. Any such committee, to the
extent permitted by law and to the
extent provided in the resolution of the
Board of Directors, shall have and may
exercise all the powers and authority of
the Board of Directors in the
management of the business and affairs
of the Corporation, and may authorize
the seal of the Corporation, if any, to be
affixed to all papers which may require
it. The proposed rule change provides
additional detail regarding the specific
authority of the Board to designate
members of the committees and their
general powers and authority to manage
the Corporation, as well as the power
invested in the voting members
regarding the appointment of a member
of the Board to act in a circumstance of
disqualification. The proposed language
is consistent with the DGCL and reflects
current best practice.
The proposed rule changes to Section
4.2 (The Executive Committee) removes
language that lists out specific actions or
matters that are not to be handled by the
Executive Committee under Delaware
law, including amending the Certificate
of Incorporation, adopting an agreement
of merger or consolidation, approving a
sale, lease or exchange of all or
substantially all of the Corporation’s
property and assets, or approval of a
dissolution of the Corporation or
revocation of a dissolution. The
proposed change, instead, replaces this
list with reference to matters under the
DGCL to be submitted to stockholders
for approval. The Exchange believes that
the proposed change, while being
consistent with the DGCL, removes
ambiguous and potentially
unnecessarily limiting language that
lists the circumstances that could not be
handled by the Executive Committee
that required stockholder approval and
replaces it with broader reference to the
DGCL.
The proposed change to Section 4.5
(The Nominating and Governance
Committee) reduces the minimum size
requirement of the Nominating and
Governance Committee (‘‘N&G
Committee’’) from a minimum of five
members to three members. This
proposed rule change is intended to
provide the Board additional flexibility
when populating the N&G Committee
and is consistent with the minimum
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
number of members required on other
Board committees.11
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Proposed Changes to Article 8—Notices
The proposed rule change in Section
8.1 (Notices) replaces language in
paragraph (e) that requires that
stockholders opt-in to email notice with
language that instead allows
stockholders to opt-out of email notice
or not receive email notice if such
notice is prohibited by the DGCL. The
proposed rule change also updates
Section 8.2 (Electronic Notice) to reflect
this change. The proposed rule change
also removes the provision in Section
8.1 paragraph (c) which provides that
notice may be given by messenger or
overnight courier service if the delivery
method does not require payment of the
messenger or courier service fee to
deliver the notice by the person to
whom the notice is addressed. The
proposed rule change then adds to
paragraph (c) that notice is deemed to
have been given via this method at the
earlier of when the notice is received or
left at the stockholder’s or director’s
address. The proposed change is
consistent with the DGCL.
Proposed Rule Changes to Article 11
(Forum for Adjudication of Disputes)
The proposed rule changes to Article
11 add clarifying provisions and
additional detail regarding the exclusive
forum. The proposed changes are
designed to update the exclusive forum
bylaw to reflect current best practices.
Specifically, the proposed rule change
adds that, among the existing actions
listed, the Court of Chancery of the State
of Delaware will be the sole and
exclusive forum for any action asserting
an ‘‘internal corporate claim’’ (defined
in the DGCL). The proposed rule change
also provides that, in the event that the
Delaware Court of Chancery lacks
subject matter jurisdiction over any
such action or proceeding, the sole and
exclusive forum for such action or
proceeding shall be another state or
federal court located within the State of
Delaware. The proposed rule change
provides that any person or entity
purchasing or otherwise acquiring any
interest in shares of capital stock of the
Corporation is deemed to have notice of
and consented to the provisions of
Article 1, including exclusive personal
jurisdiction in the Delaware Court or
Chancery and having service of process
made, even if an action (within the
scope of Article 11) is filed in a court
other than a court located within the
State of Delaware. Additionally, the
proposed rule change makes clear that
the existence of any prior consent to, or
selection of, an alternative forum by the
Corporation shall not act as a waiver of
the Corporation’s ongoing consent right
in Article 11 and that failure to enforce
the foregoing provisions would cause
the Corporation irreparable harm and
the Corporation is entitled to equitable
relief, including injunctive relief and
specific performance, to enforce Article
11. It also clarifies that a claim may be
made against the Corporation or any
current or former director, officer, other
employee, agent or stockholder of the
Corporation, and may arise pursuant to
the Certificate of Incorporation or these
Bylaws, in addition to the DCGL. The
proposed rule change is in line with
current best practice, and, additionally,
the bylaws of Cboe’s peer, CME,12
currently provide for similar language
related to foreign actions and specific
performance.
Finally, the proposed rule change
makes non-substantive edits throughout
the above listed Articles of the Parent
Bylaws, including updating paragraph
lettering and numbering, simplifying
language in order to better align it with
plain English, update the terms Board of
Directors and Exchange Act to be
uniform throughout the bylaws (e.g., as
opposed to just ‘‘Board’’, or ‘‘Securities
and Exchange Act’’, and the other
versions of the Act’s name).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the Act
and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.13 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with Section 6(b)(1)
of the Act,14 which provides that the
Exchange be organized and have the
capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act and to enforce
compliance by the Exchange’s Trading
Permit Holders and persons associated
with its Trading Permit Holders with
the Act, the rules and regulations
thereunder, and the rules of the
Exchange.
In particular, the Exchange believes
the proposed changes overall are
designed to improve the governance
process of Cboe, as well as update the
Parent Bylaws, where applicable, to
reflect and track the DCGL and current
best practices. Moreover, the Exchange
does not believe the proposed rule
changes are controversial and indeed
12 See
11 See
e.g., Sections 4.3 and 4.4 of the Parent
Bylaws.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
supra note 8.
U.S.C. 78f(b).
14 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
13 15
PO 00000
Frm 00131
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51137
are common among public companies,
including its peers, Nasdaq, ICE and
CME.
Particularly, the proposed rule
changes to proposed Section 2.11 in
connection with providing notice
regarding business and director
nominations at annual and special
meetings, will enable the Exchange to
continue to be organized and have the
capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act, because such
proposed changes are generally
designed to strengthen these provisions
by requiring notices (including updates
to notices) to disclose to the Board more
detailed information than currently
required. In this manner, the proposed
detailed disclosure requirements would
provide the Board with substantially
more information by which they may
make complete and informed decisions
and most appropriately address
business before the Board. The
Exchange also believes that the
proposed rule changes in connection
with timely notice, including the 10
days’ advanced notice of director
nominations (via the required director
questionnaire), procedures governing
advance notice of director nominations
at a special meeting, an obligation to
update and correct the notice up to 7
days prior to a meeting, and updated
timing regarding the 10-day notice of a
special meeting less than 90 days from
the scheduled meeting, will allow the
Board the appropriate time needed to
consider and prepare to address all
business, nominations, and other issues
to be presented before it. As such, the
proposed rule changes will ensure that
the Board is able to continue to oversee
the orderly operation of the corporation,
including the Exchange, in a manner the
it deems most appropriate.
Additionally, and as listed in detail
above, the vast majority of the proposed
notice requirements are consistent with
the bylaws of Cboe’s peer corporations,
CME, ICE, and/or Nasdaq, as well as in
line with current best practices. The
proposed changes are also all consistent
with the DCGL.
Moreover, the proposed changes are
intended to provide the Board with
additional flexibility and more
appropriate governance procedures in
addressing various circumstances,
which will enable the Exchange to
continue to be organized and have the
capacity to be able to carry out the
purposes of the Act. In particular, the
proposed rule changes would allow the
Board to retain both control and
flexibility over the location and timing
of stockholder meetings, would allow
the Board to postpone, recess,
reschedule or cancel a stockholder
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
51138
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
meeting, would allow only the presiding
person of a stockholder meeting to
adjourn and reset a stockholder meeting
date in the absence of quorum, would
allow for shorter notice in order for the
Board to call a special meeting, would
allow the Board and the Corporation to
continue to function (including
remotely) in the case of an emergency,
such as the ongoing COVID–19
pandemic, and would provide the Board
with increased flexibility in populating
the Nomination and Governance
Committee. Each of these proposed
changes is designed to assist the
Exchange in most effectively and
efficiently managing evolving corporate
matters as they arise, many of which are
highly complex and may be time
sensitive. Additionally, as indicated
above, a majority of the proposed
changes align certain Sections in the
Parent Bylaws with current best
practices and with the DCGL (as well as
a change in accordance with Delaware
common law) and are also consistent
with bylaw provisions of Cboe’s peer
corporations. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes the proposed changes are
widely accepted as appropriate
governance measures.
Lastly, the proposed nonsubstantive
changes to the Parent Bylaws provide
additional clarity within the Parent
Bylaws and make them easier to
understand. By making certain
provisions read more in plain English,
updating paragraph lettering and
numbering, making certain terms
uniform and simplifying language
throughout, the proposed
nonsubstantive changes benefit
investors by providing more clarity and
reduced complexity within the Parent
Bylaws and making the Parent Bylaw
[sic] better organized and easier to
follow thus reducing potential investor
confusion.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
proposed rule change is not intended to
address competitive issues but rather is
concerned solely with updating the
Parent Bylaws to reflect the changes
described above.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register or within such longer period
up to 90 days (i) as the Commission may
designate if it finds such longer period
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which
the Exchange consents, the Commission
will:
A. By order approve or disapprove
such proposed rule change, or
B. institute proceedings to determine
whether the proposed rule change
should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CboeEDGX–2020–037 on the subject
line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2020–037. This
file number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
PO 00000
Frm 00132
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CboeEDGX–2020–037 and
should be submitted on or before
September 9, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.15
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–18096 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Military Reservist Economic Injury
Disaster Loans; Interest Rate for
Fourth Quarter FY 2020
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
This is a notice of the Military
Reservist Economic Injury Disaster
Loans interest rate for loans approved
on or after July 31, 2020.
DATES: Issued on 07/31/2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: A.
Escobar, Office of Disaster Assistance,
U.S. Small Business Administration,
409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050,
Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205–6734.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Small
Business Administration publishes an
interest rate for Military Reservist
Economic Injury Disaster Loans (13 CFR
123.512) on a quarterly basis. The
interest rate will be 3.000 for loans
approved on or after July 31, 2020.
SUMMARY:
Cynthia Pitts,
Acting Associate Administrator for Disaster
Assistance.
[FR Doc. 2020–18171 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026–03–P
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
[Disaster Declaration #16575 and #16576;
Indiana Disaster Number IN–00074]
Administrative Declaration of a
Disaster for the State of Indiana
U.S. Small Business
Administration.
AGENCY:
15 17
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51132-51138]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18096]
[[Page 51132]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-89542; File No. SR-CboeEDGX-2020-037]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc.; Notice
of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the Fifth Amended and
Restated Bylaws of the Exchange's Parent Corporation, Cboe Global
Markets, Inc.
August 13, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on July 30, 2020, Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or
``EDGX'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II,
and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe EDGX Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``EDGX'') proposes to
amend the Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws (the ``Parent Bylaws'') of
its parent corporation, Cboe Global Markets, Inc. (``Cboe'' or the
``Parent''). The text of the proposed amendments to the Parent Bylaws
is provided in Exhibit 5.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://markets.cboe.com/us/options/regulation/rule_filings/edgx/), at the Exchange's Office of the Secretary, and at
the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The proposed rule change amends the Parent Bylaws to improve the
governance processes of Cboe, which is organized under the laws of the
State of Delaware, and to make certain provisions more consistent with
the Delaware General Corporation Law (``DGCL''). The proposed rule
change also makes clarifying and cleanup changes to the Parent Bylaws.
Proposed Changes to Article 2--Stockholders
The majority of the proposed changes are being made to amend
Section 2.11 (Nomination of Directors) and Section 2.12 (Notice of
Business at Annual Meetings) and are generally designed to provide the
Board with the most information and advance notice possible in
connection with business and nominations at annual and special
meetings. Additionally, the Exchange notes the proposed changes reflect
the most up-to-date disclosure requirement practices. The proposed
changes also combine the existing separate provisions for director
nominations and stockholder proposals into one provision. Particularly,
the proposed rule change combines current Sections 2.11 and 2.12 into
one provision: Proposed Section 2.11 titled ``Notice of Business and
Nomination of Directors at Meetings of Stockholders.'' \3\
Specifically, the proposed rule change delineates proposed Section 2.11
into paragraph (a) governing notice requirements for annual meetings,
paragraph (b) governing notice requirements for special meetings,\4\
and paragraph (c), which provides for other general procedures and
practices in connection with notices. The proposed delineation does not
alter the process or definition of either type of meeting, but instead
provides for significantly more detailed written notice requirements as
well as updates to the manner and timeliness of notices.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The proposed rule change also updates the subsequent section
numbering (current 2.13 through 2.16) to reflect this change
(proposed 2.12 through 2.15).
\4\ See Section 2.3 of the Parent Bylaws for a description of
Special Meetings.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
First, the proposed change to Section 2.11(a)(i) relocates the
provisions regarding ``properly brought'' business from current Section
2.12, and streamlines such provisions to clearly state that the only
business that will be conducted at an annual meeting of the
stockholders is business that has properly been brought before the
meeting and specifies to be ``properly brought'' such business must be
included in the Corporation's notice of the meeting and brought
pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (the
``Exchange Act'') (or any successor provision of law) and included in
the Corporation's properly brought business. It also proposes to
specify the a precise time that the notices must be made by (i.e.,
delivered to or mailed and received by the Secretary of the
Corporation), which is not later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on the
90th day nor earlier than the 120th day (which are the time frames
currently in place) prior to such annual meeting.
Next, the proposed rule change adds greater detail regarding the
requirements for proper written notice. Particularly, for notice for
stockholder proposals for business other than nominations, (proposed
Section 2.11(a)(iii)(A)), the proposed rule change provides that such
notice must essentially set forth the same information that would be
disclosed in a proxy statement, including:
A reasonably brief description of the business desired to
be brought before the meeting; the text of the proposal or business
(including the text of any resolutions proposed for consideration and,
in the event that such business includes a proposal to amend the
Certificate of Incorporation or the Bylaws of the Corporation, the
language of the proposed amendment);
the reasons for conducting such business at the meeting; a
complete and accurate description of any material interest in such
business of such stockholder and any Stockholder Associated Person,
individually or in the aggregate, including any anticipated benefit to
the stockholder and any Stockholder Associated Person therefrom; and
all other information relating to such proposed business
that would be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other
filing required to be made by the stockholder or any Stockholder
Associated Person in connection with the solicitation of proxies in
support of such proposed business pursuant to Regulation 14A under the
Exchange Act.
Regarding proposed proper written notice for director nominations
(proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(B)), the notice must include:
The name, age, business address and residence address of
such nominee, (``Proposed Nominee'') (which, the Exchange notes is
currently the case);
[[Page 51133]]
the principal occupation or employment of such nominee
(which, the Exchange notes is currently the case)
a completed written questionnaire with respect to the
background and qualifications of such Proposed Nominee, which must be
completed in a form required by the Corporation and provided to such
stockholder within ten days of receiving such request;
the Proposed Nominee's executed written consent to being
named in the proxy statement for the meeting as a director nominee;
the Proposed Nominee's completed written representation
and agreement, which must be completed in a form required by the
Corporation and provided to such stockholder within ten days of
receiving such request. Importantly, the Proposed Nominee must
represent and agree (1) to a ``Voting Commitment'' that the Proposed
Nominee is not and will not become party to any agreement, arrangement
or understanding with, and has not given any commitment or assurance
to, any person or entity as to how such Proposed Nominee, if elected as
a director, will act or vote on any issue or question (that has not
been disclosed to the Corporation). or any Voting Commitment that could
limit or interfere with the Proposed Nominee's ability to comply with
fiduciary duties under applicable law, (2) that the Proposed Nominee is
not and will not become a party to any agreement, arrangement, or
understanding with any person or entity other than the Corporation with
respect to any direct or indirect compensation, reimbursement, or
indemnification in connection with service or action as a director that
has not been disclosed to the Corporation, (3) would comply with all
applicable rules of the exchange and Corporation and fiduciary duties
under state law, (4) would comply with certain Articles of
Incorporation with respect to activities related to any of the
Exchanges, (5) intends to serve a full term if elected, and (6) will
provide true and correct information in communications to the
Corporation and its stockholders and will not omit material information
or provide misleading information;
a description of all direct and indirect compensation and
other material monetary agreements, arrangements and understandings
during the past three years, and any other material relationships; and
any other information that would be required to be
disclosed statement or other filing required to be made in connection
with solicitations of proxies for election of directors in a contested
election pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act (which, the
Exchange notes is currently the case).
As to the stockholder providing notice, any Stockholder Associated
Person and any Proposed Nominee, (proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(C)) the
proposed proper written notice must provide:
Name and address of such person (as they appear on the
Corporation's books, if applicable) (which, the Exchange notes is
currently the case);
class (which is currently the case) or series and number
of shares of capital stock of the Corporation (``Shares'') which are,
directly or indirectly, owned beneficially and/or of record by such
person, the dates such shares were acquired and the investment intent
of such acquisition;
the name of each nominee holder for, and any pledge by
such person or any number of, securities of the Corporation owned
beneficially, but not of record;
short interest, including a definition of what constitutes
short interest, wherein a person shall be deemed to have a short
interest in a security if such person, directly or indirectly, through
any contract, arrangement, understanding, or relationship or otherwise
has an opportunity to profit or share in profit derived from decreased
value of the subject security;
a description of any agreement, arrangement or
understanding, whether written or oral, (including any derivative or
short positions, profit interests, options, warrants, convertible
securities, stock appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions,
and borrowed or loaned shares (which, the Exchange notes, is currently
the case) or similar rights with an exercise or conversion privilege or
a settlement payment or mechanism at a price related to any class or
series of capital stock of the Corporation or with a value derived in
whole or in part from the value of any class or series of capital stock
of the Corporation (a ``Derivative Instrument'')), in order to mitigate
loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or increase
or decrease voting power with respect to Shares;
any rights to dividends on the Shares owned beneficially
by such person;
any proportionate interest \5\ in Shares or Derivative
Instruments by a general or limited partnership or similar entity in
which such person (1) is a general partner or beneficially owns an
interest in a general partner, or (2) is the manager, managing member,
or beneficially owns an interest in such management, of a limited
liability company or similar entity;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Interest referred to throughout the proposed stockholder
proper written notice may be direct or indirect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
any substantial interest (including, without limitation,
any existing or prospective commercial, business or contractual
relationship with the Corporation), by security holdings or otherwise,
in the Corporation or any of its affiliates;
a complete and accurate description of all agreements,
arrangements or understandings, written or oral, and formal or
informal, between or among the stockholder providing notice and any of
the Stockholder Associated Persons (collectively, the
``Stockholders''), or the Stockholders with any Proposed Nominee and
any other person in connection with (1) any proxy, contract,
arrangement, understanding or relationship where either of the
Stockholders have the right to vote any Shares, (2) that such
individuals may have reached with any stockholder of the Corporation
regarding how such stockholder will vote its shares, take other action
in support of any Proposed Nominee, or other action by either of the
Stockholders, and (3) any other agreements that would be required to be
disclosed by either of the Stockholders or any other person or entity
pursuant to a Schedule 13D filed pursuant to the Exchange Act
a complete and accurate description of any performance-
related fees to which such person may be entitled as a result of any
increase or decrease in the value of Shares or any Derivative
Instruments;
any investment strategy or objective of those who are not
an individual and a copy of the prospectus (and other like documents);
a complete and accurate description of any pending or
threatened legal proceeding in which such person is a party or
participant involving the Corporation;
if any agreement, arrangement or understanding has been
made to increase or decrease the voting power of such person with
respect to any Shares; and
any other information relating to such person that would
be required to be disclosed in a proxy statement or other filing
required to be made in connection with solicitations of proxies for
such business or the election of any Proposed Nominee, or is otherwise
required, pursuant to Section 14 of the Exchange Act.
Further, regarding proposed proper written notice, proposed Section
2.11(a)(iii)(D) simplifies the language in
[[Page 51134]]
connection with the current requirement that the Stockholders must
represent if they intend to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of
proxy to holders to approve or adopt the proposed business, elect the
Proposed Nominee, and/or otherwise solicit proxies or votes from
stockholders in support of such proposed business or Proposed Nominee,
making it easier to understand.
Proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(E) provides for the current
requirement that the stockholder providing notice must represent that
it is a holder of record of stock of the Corporation entitled to vote
at such meeting and intends to appear in person, and adds that ``in
person'' may be virtually, in the case of a meeting held solely by
means of remote communication) or by proxy at the meeting to bring such
proposed business and/or nominate one or more Proposed Nominee.
Proposed Section 2.11(a)(iii)(F) requires that proper written
notice include an acknowledgment that the Corporation does not have to
present the business or nomination being brought at the meeting by the
stockholder proposing such, if such stockholder does not appear. The
proposed rule change also adds that, in addition to the proper written
notice information, the Corporation may require any Proposed Nominee to
furnish certain other information as the Corporation may reasonably
require to determine the eligibility or independence of a Proposed
Nominee.
Proposed Section 2.11(b), which, as stated, delineates the
provisions governing special meetings of stockholders, amends the
procedures governing advance notice of director nominations at a
special meeting called by the Board for the election of directors.
Currently, notices of a special meeting must be made not less than
ninety (90) days nor more than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to
the anniversary date of the immediately preceding annual meeting of
stockholders; provided, however, that if the annual meeting is not held
within thirty (30) days before or more than seventy (70) days after
such anniversary date, then such nomination shall have been delivered
to or mailed and received by the Secretary not later than the close of
business on the 10th day following the date on which public
announcement of the annual meeting date was made. The proposed rule
change updates this notice procedure to mirror the same procedural
language in proposed Section 2.11(a)(ii) (maintaining the same 90- to
120-day notice requirement), but updates the timing requirements to
remove the language regarding the 30-day and 70-day time frames around
the anniversary date and provides that, if public announcement of the
special meeting and the nominees proposed by the Board of Directors to
be elected at such meeting is first made less than ninety (90) days
prior to the date of the special meeting, notice must be made the tenth
(10th) day following the day on which such public announcement is first
made. The Exchange believes this proposed timing provision simplifies
the timing requirement, making it easier to understand and follow, and
also provides ample time to provide notice in advance to stockholders
of any scheduled special meeting. Proposed Section 2.11(b) also
provides that proper written notice of a special meeting must comply
with the requirements, as proposed, laid out in Section 2.11(a)(iii).
Proposed Section 2.11(c) provides, generally, for other procedures
and practices in connection with notices, as well as certain defined
terms. Proposed Section 2.11(c)(i) provides that a stockholder
providing notice must update any notice, if necessary, so that the
information provided or required to be provided in a notice is be true
and correct (A) as of the record date for determining the stockholders
entitled to receive notice of the meeting and (B) as of the date that
is ten business days prior to the meeting (or any postponement,
adjournment or recess thereof). If an update is required to be made as
of the record date for determining the stockholders entitled to receive
notice of the meeting then the notice of update must be made not later
than five business days after the record date for determining the
stockholders entitled to receive notice of such meeting. If an update
is required to be made as of the date that is ten business days prior
to the meeting (or any postponement, adjournment or recess thereof),
then the notice of update must be made no later than seven business
days prior to the date for the meeting, if practicable, or, if not
practicable, on the first practicable date prior to the meeting or any
adjournment, recess or postponement thereof Proposed Section
2.11(c)(ii) provides that if any information submitted pursuant to
Section 2.11 is inaccurate in any respect, such information may be
deemed not to have been provided in accordance with the Parent Bylaws.
As proposed, the stockholder providing the notice has an obligation to
notify the Secretary in writing at the principal executive offices of
the Corporation of any inaccuracy or change in any such information
within two business days of becoming aware of such inaccuracy or
change. Additionally, within seven days upon delivery of a written
request by the Secretary, the Board of Directors (or a duly authorized
committee thereof), any such stockholder is obliged to provide: (A)
Written verification, reasonably satisfactory to the Board of
Directors, any committee thereof or any authorized officer of the
Corporation, to demonstrate the accuracy of any information submitted
by the stockholder pursuant to Section 2.11, and (B) a written update
of any information pursuant to Section 2.11 as of an earlier date. If
the stockholder fails to provide such written verification within such
period, the information as to which written verification was requested
may be deemed not to have been provided in accordance with Section
2.11. Proposed Section 2.11(c)(iii) provides that a stockholder
providing notice must also comply with all applicable requirements of
state law and all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the
rules and regulations thereunder, however, references to the Exchange
Act and its rules and regulations will not limit the requirements
applicable to stockholder proposals or director nominations pursuant to
Section 2.11. Proposed Section 2.11(c)(iv) updates current language
governing failure for the proposing stockholder to appear by adding
that virtual appearances are acceptable when such meeting is being held
remotely, as well as the flexibility for the Corporation to waive the
appearance requirement. The rule change updates this provision and adds
this flexibility in light of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic and the
consequential remote working status for many companies, including Cboe.
Proposed Section 2.11(c)(v) adds the definition of key terms, along
with current definitions, for clarity. Specifically, the proposed rule
change defines an ``affiliate'' and ``associate'' as having the
respective meanings set forth in Rule 12b-2 under the Exchange Act and
``Stockholder Associated Person'' to mean: any person who is a member
of a ``group'' (used in Rule 13d-5 under the Exchange Act) with or
otherwise acting in concert with such stockholder providing notice; any
beneficial owner of shares of stock of the Corporation owned of record
or beneficially by such stockholder (other than a stockholder that is a
depositary); any person that directly, or indirectly through one or
more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common
control with, such stockholder or such
[[Page 51135]]
Stockholder Associated Person and beneficially owns, directly or
indirectly, shares of stock of the Corporation; any person that
directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls
such stockholder or any Stockholder Associated Person; and any
participant (as defined in paragraphs (a)(ii)-(vi) of Instruction 3 to
Item 4 of Schedule 14A, or any successor instructions) with such
stockholder or other Stockholder Associated Person in respect of any
proposals or nominations, as applicable.
The Exchange notes that many of the proposed rule changes to
proposed Section 2.11 are consistent with the bylaws of Cboe's peer
financial market/services corporations, Nasdaq, Inc (``Nasdaq''),\6\
Intercontinental Exchange (``ICE''),\7\ and/or the CME Group, Inc.
(``CME''),\8\ including:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See By-laws of Nasdaq, Inc., available at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/assets/RuleBook/NASDAQ/rules/Nasdaq_Inc_Corporate_Organization_Nasdaq_Inc.pdf.
\7\ See Eighth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Intercontinental
Exchange, Inc., available at https://s2.q4cdn.com/154085107/files/doc_downloads/intercontinental_exchange/bylaws-eighth-amended.pdf.
\8\ See Fifteenth Amended and Restated Bylaws of CME Group Inc.,
available at https://www.cmegroup.com/rulebook/files/CME-Bylaws.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed disclosures required under Regulation 14A for
proposed business other than director nominations; director
questionnaires;
consent to be named in the proxy statement as a director
nominee;
a Voting Commitment;
disclosure of compensation arrangements in connection with
service as a director;
agreement to comply with applicable regulations,
organizational documents and policies;
representation of intent to serve a full term; commitment
to provide true and correct facts and to not omit material facts;
nominee disclosures for contested elections under Section
14;
required disclosure by a proposing stockholder's 13D group
members and related parties;
disclosure of rights to dividends, short interest,
interests held through controlled partnerships or LLCs, and in the
Company other than Company common stock;
disclosure of agreements/arrangements in connection with
conferring proxy authority, with any other stockholder regarding voting
or supporting the proposal/nominee, with increasing or decreasing
voting power, and agreements required to be disclosed on Schedule 13D;
disclosure of performance-related fees related to the
Company's performance;
disclosure of investment strategy and inclusion of
prospectus/offering memorandum;
disclosure of pending or threatened litigation;
Special meeting provisions;
Obligation to update and correct disclosures; and
Express obligation to appear to present the proposal/
nominee.
Additionally, the proposed rule change moves language currently in
Section 2.10 providing that the number of nominees for director may not
exceed the number of directors to be elected at any meeting to proposed
Section 2.11(a) (annual meetings) and Section 2.11(b) (special
meetings), therefore adding clarity to the updated Section 2.11 format
that this provision continues to apply for both annual and special
meetings. The proposed rule change to Section 2.10 also simplifies
current language that provides an election may proceed if proper notice
is made and received and adds language that nominations may be
withdrawn on or prior to the tenth day before the date the Corporation
first mails its notice of meeting for such election.
The proposed rule change also amends Section 2.1 (Place of
Meetings) by removing language that requires stockholder meetings to be
held at the principal place of business of the Company if no location
is designated. The Exchange believes that it is appropriate for the
Board to retain both control and flexibility over the location and
timing of stockholder meetings. The proposed rule change amends Section
2.2 (Annual Meeting) and Section 2.3 (Special Meeting) to provide that
the Board may postpone, reschedule or cancel any previously-scheduled
annual meeting or special meeting, respectively. The proposed rule
change also updates Section 2.7 (Adjournments) to provide that only the
presiding person of a stockholder meeting can adjourn the meeting in
the absence of a quorum. The proposed changes are intended to provide
the Board the flexibility to postpone, recess, reschedule or cancel a
stockholder meeting. The Exchange also notes that the proposed rule
changes to Sections 2.2, 2.3, and 2.7 are consistent with the bylaws of
Cboe's peer corporation, Nasdaq.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See supra note 6.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule change also makes updates to reflect the current
best corporate governance practices to certain Sections under Article
2. In particular, it updates the language in Section 2.5 (Voting List)
regarding who is required to prepare the voting list. Section 2.5
currently provides that officer who has charge of the stock ledger
prepares the voting list and the proposed rule change updates this to
provide that the Corporation prepares the voting list. The proposed
rule change is consistent with the DGCL and reflects current best
practice. The proposed rule change also amends current Section 2.13
(Organization) (proposed Section 2.12), which currently states that
that the Board of Directors may appoint any stockholder to act as
chairman of any meeting in the absence of the Chairman of the Board, to
instead provide that that the Board of Directors may appoint any
director of the Corporation to act as chairman of any meeting in the
absence of the Chairman of the Board. Also, current Section 2.16
(Conduct of Meetings) (proposed Section 2.15) makes certain changes to
expand the procedural authority of the presiding officer of any
stockholder meeting, including the right to recess and/or adjourn
meetings for any or no reason, and the determination of when the polls
will open and close for any given matter to be voted on at the meeting,
the removal of any stockholder or individual who refuses to comply with
meeting procedures, rules, or guidelines, the restrictions on the use
of audio and/or video recording devices and cell phones. This is
consistent with best practice and ensures that the presiding officer
has the flexibility to take measures, as needed, that ensure meetings
are conducted in the most appropriate manner.
Proposed Changes to Article 3--Directors
The proposed rule change amends Section 3.5 (Vacancies) to provide
that that vacancies on the Board may be filled exclusively by a
majority of the directors. The Exchange notes that stockholders have a
common law right under Delaware law to fill director vacancies, unless
the Company's Charter or Bylaws explicitly give the Board exclusive
authority, therefore, the proposed change is designed to make this
right exclusive to the Board. The proposed rule change is consistent
with the bylaws of Cboe's peer corporations, Nasdaq and ICE.\10\ The
proposed rule change to Section 3.10 (Special Meetings) would allow
special meetings of the Board to be called with less than 24 hours'
notice. Currently, Section 3.10 requires at least 24 hours' notice to
directors of special Board meetings.
[[Page 51136]]
However, there may be circumstances that necessitate an emergency
meeting of the Board with less than 24 hours' notice (e.g., in relation
to a pending transaction), and therefore, the proposed changes would
allow notice on a shorter time frame if necessary and appropriate under
the circumstances. The proposed changes to Section 3.13 (Action by
Consent) updates language regarding routine filing of consents
following an action by the Board. Specifically, the proposed change
updates the consents to reflect the same electronic form as minutes are
maintained, which is consistent with recent amendments to the DGCL,
reflects current best practice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See supra notes 6 and 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed change also adds Section 3.15 (Emergency Bylaws).
Specifically, the proposed Section 3.15 provides that, notwithstanding
anything to the contrary in the Certificate of Incorporation or these
Bylaws, in the event there is any emergency, disaster or catastrophe,
as referred to in Section 110 of the DGCL, or other similar emergency
condition (each, an ``emergency''), and a quorum of the Board of
Directors cannot readily be convened for action, this Section 3.15
shall apply., including:
Any director or Chief Executive Officer, President, Chief
Operating Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer or Secretary of
the Corporation may call a meeting of the Board of Directors by any
feasible means and with such advance notice as circumstances permit in
the judgment of the person calling the meeting. Neither the business to
be transacted nor the purpose of any such meeting need be specified in
the notice thereof.
One-third (\1/3\) of the directors shall constitute a
quorum, which may in all cases act by majority vote.
Directors may take action to appoint one or more of the
director or directors to membership on any standing or temporary
committees of the Board of Directors as they deem advisable. Directors
may also take action to designate one or more of the officers of the
Corporation to serve as directors of the Corporation while this Section
3.15 applies.
To the extent that it considers it practical to do so, the
Board of Directors shall manage the business of the Corporation during
an emergency in a manner that is consistent with the Certificate of
Incorporation and Bylaws. It is recognized, however, that in an
emergency it may not always be practical to act in this manner and this
Section 3.15 is intended to and does hereby empower the Board of
Directors with the maximum authority possible under the DGCL, and all
other applicable law, to conduct the interim management of the affairs
of the Corporation in an emergency in what it considers to be in the
best interests of the Corporation.
No director, officer or employee acting in good faith in
accordance with this Section 3.15 or otherwise pursuant to Section 110
of the DGCL shall be liable except for willful misconduct.
This Section 3.15 shall continue to apply until such time
following the emergency when it is feasible for at least a majority of
the directors of the Corporation immediately prior to the emergency to
resume management of the business of the Corporation.
The Board of Directors may modify, amend or add to the
provisions of this Section 3.15 in order to make any provision that may
be practical or necessary given the circumstances of the emergency.
The provisions of this Section 3.15 shall be subject to
repeal or change by further action of the Board of Directors or by
action of the stockholders, but no such repeal or change shall modify
the provisions of paragraph (e) of this Section 3.15 with regard to
action taken prior to the time of such repeal or change.
The Exchange notes that these proposed changes are largely
consistent with the DGCL and are designed to allow the Board and the
Corporation to continue to function in the case of an emergency, such
as a pandemic or an act of terrorism. The Exchange believes the ongoing
COVID-19 pandemic, as well as similar potential events, demonstrate the
need for Emergency Bylaws and notes that a number of companies are
adopting (or at least considering) emergency bylaws to relax Board
requirements when directors may be unavailable due to emergency
conditions, such as the pandemic.
Proposed Changes to Article 4--Committees
The proposed rule change to Section 4.1 (Designation of Committees)
adds language that provides the Board with additional rights in their
ability to designate committees and committee alternates and specifies
that such committees may exercise all powers and authority of the Board
in the management of the business. Specifically, the proposed language
provides that the Board of Directors may designate one or more
committees, each committee to consist of one or more of the directors
of the Corporation. The Board of Directors may designate one or more
directors as alternate members of any committee, who may replace any
absent or disqualified member at any meeting of the committee. In the
absence or disqualification of a member of the committee, the member or
members thereof present at any meeting and not disqualified from
voting, whether or not he, she or they constitute a quorum, may
unanimously appoint another member of the Board of Directors to act at
the meeting in place of any such absent or disqualified member. Any
such committee, to the extent permitted by law and to the extent
provided in the resolution of the Board of Directors, shall have and
may exercise all the powers and authority of the Board of Directors in
the management of the business and affairs of the Corporation, and may
authorize the seal of the Corporation, if any, to be affixed to all
papers which may require it. The proposed rule change provides
additional detail regarding the specific authority of the Board to
designate members of the committees and their general powers and
authority to manage the Corporation, as well as the power invested in
the voting members regarding the appointment of a member of the Board
to act in a circumstance of disqualification. The proposed language is
consistent with the DGCL and reflects current best practice.
The proposed rule changes to Section 4.2 (The Executive Committee)
removes language that lists out specific actions or matters that are
not to be handled by the Executive Committee under Delaware law,
including amending the Certificate of Incorporation, adopting an
agreement of merger or consolidation, approving a sale, lease or
exchange of all or substantially all of the Corporation's property and
assets, or approval of a dissolution of the Corporation or revocation
of a dissolution. The proposed change, instead, replaces this list with
reference to matters under the DGCL to be submitted to stockholders for
approval. The Exchange believes that the proposed change, while being
consistent with the DGCL, removes ambiguous and potentially
unnecessarily limiting language that lists the circumstances that could
not be handled by the Executive Committee that required stockholder
approval and replaces it with broader reference to the DGCL.
The proposed change to Section 4.5 (The Nominating and Governance
Committee) reduces the minimum size requirement of the Nominating and
Governance Committee (``N&G Committee'') from a minimum of five members
to three members. This proposed rule change is intended to provide the
Board additional flexibility when populating the N&G Committee and is
consistent with the minimum
[[Page 51137]]
number of members required on other Board committees.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ See e.g., Sections 4.3 and 4.4 of the Parent Bylaws.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Changes to Article 8--Notices
The proposed rule change in Section 8.1 (Notices) replaces language
in paragraph (e) that requires that stockholders opt-in to email notice
with language that instead allows stockholders to opt-out of email
notice or not receive email notice if such notice is prohibited by the
DGCL. The proposed rule change also updates Section 8.2 (Electronic
Notice) to reflect this change. The proposed rule change also removes
the provision in Section 8.1 paragraph (c) which provides that notice
may be given by messenger or overnight courier service if the delivery
method does not require payment of the messenger or courier service fee
to deliver the notice by the person to whom the notice is addressed.
The proposed rule change then adds to paragraph (c) that notice is
deemed to have been given via this method at the earlier of when the
notice is received or left at the stockholder's or director's address.
The proposed change is consistent with the DGCL.
Proposed Rule Changes to Article 11 (Forum for Adjudication of
Disputes)
The proposed rule changes to Article 11 add clarifying provisions
and additional detail regarding the exclusive forum. The proposed
changes are designed to update the exclusive forum bylaw to reflect
current best practices. Specifically, the proposed rule change adds
that, among the existing actions listed, the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any action
asserting an ``internal corporate claim'' (defined in the DGCL). The
proposed rule change also provides that, in the event that the Delaware
Court of Chancery lacks subject matter jurisdiction over any such
action or proceeding, the sole and exclusive forum for such action or
proceeding shall be another state or federal court located within the
State of Delaware. The proposed rule change provides that any person or
entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of
capital stock of the Corporation is deemed to have notice of and
consented to the provisions of Article 1, including exclusive personal
jurisdiction in the Delaware Court or Chancery and having service of
process made, even if an action (within the scope of Article 11) is
filed in a court other than a court located within the State of
Delaware. Additionally, the proposed rule change makes clear that the
existence of any prior consent to, or selection of, an alternative
forum by the Corporation shall not act as a waiver of the Corporation's
ongoing consent right in Article 11 and that failure to enforce the
foregoing provisions would cause the Corporation irreparable harm and
the Corporation is entitled to equitable relief, including injunctive
relief and specific performance, to enforce Article 11. It also
clarifies that a claim may be made against the Corporation or any
current or former director, officer, other employee, agent or
stockholder of the Corporation, and may arise pursuant to the
Certificate of Incorporation or these Bylaws, in addition to the DCGL.
The proposed rule change is in line with current best practice, and,
additionally, the bylaws of Cboe's peer, CME,\12\ currently provide for
similar language related to foreign actions and specific performance.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See supra note 8.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Finally, the proposed rule change makes non-substantive edits
throughout the above listed Articles of the Parent Bylaws, including
updating paragraph lettering and numbering, simplifying language in
order to better align it with plain English, update the terms Board of
Directors and Exchange Act to be uniform throughout the bylaws (e.g.,
as opposed to just ``Board'', or ``Securities and Exchange Act'', and
the other versions of the Act's name).
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to the
Exchange and, in particular, the requirements of Section 6(b) of the
Act.\13\ Specifically, the Exchange believes the proposed rule change
is consistent with Section 6(b)(1) of the Act,\14\ which provides that
the Exchange be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act and to enforce compliance by the Exchange's
Trading Permit Holders and persons associated with its Trading Permit
Holders with the Act, the rules and regulations thereunder, and the
rules of the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, the Exchange believes the proposed changes overall
are designed to improve the governance process of Cboe, as well as
update the Parent Bylaws, where applicable, to reflect and track the
DCGL and current best practices. Moreover, the Exchange does not
believe the proposed rule changes are controversial and indeed are
common among public companies, including its peers, Nasdaq, ICE and
CME.
Particularly, the proposed rule changes to proposed Section 2.11 in
connection with providing notice regarding business and director
nominations at annual and special meetings, will enable the Exchange to
continue to be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act, because such proposed changes are generally
designed to strengthen these provisions by requiring notices (including
updates to notices) to disclose to the Board more detailed information
than currently required. In this manner, the proposed detailed
disclosure requirements would provide the Board with substantially more
information by which they may make complete and informed decisions and
most appropriately address business before the Board. The Exchange also
believes that the proposed rule changes in connection with timely
notice, including the 10 days' advanced notice of director nominations
(via the required director questionnaire), procedures governing advance
notice of director nominations at a special meeting, an obligation to
update and correct the notice up to 7 days prior to a meeting, and
updated timing regarding the 10-day notice of a special meeting less
than 90 days from the scheduled meeting, will allow the Board the
appropriate time needed to consider and prepare to address all
business, nominations, and other issues to be presented before it. As
such, the proposed rule changes will ensure that the Board is able to
continue to oversee the orderly operation of the corporation, including
the Exchange, in a manner the it deems most appropriate. Additionally,
and as listed in detail above, the vast majority of the proposed notice
requirements are consistent with the bylaws of Cboe's peer
corporations, CME, ICE, and/or Nasdaq, as well as in line with current
best practices. The proposed changes are also all consistent with the
DCGL.
Moreover, the proposed changes are intended to provide the Board
with additional flexibility and more appropriate governance procedures
in addressing various circumstances, which will enable the Exchange to
continue to be organized and have the capacity to be able to carry out
the purposes of the Act. In particular, the proposed rule changes would
allow the Board to retain both control and flexibility over the
location and timing of stockholder meetings, would allow the Board to
postpone, recess, reschedule or cancel a stockholder
[[Page 51138]]
meeting, would allow only the presiding person of a stockholder meeting
to adjourn and reset a stockholder meeting date in the absence of
quorum, would allow for shorter notice in order for the Board to call a
special meeting, would allow the Board and the Corporation to continue
to function (including remotely) in the case of an emergency, such as
the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, and would provide the Board with
increased flexibility in populating the Nomination and Governance
Committee. Each of these proposed changes is designed to assist the
Exchange in most effectively and efficiently managing evolving
corporate matters as they arise, many of which are highly complex and
may be time sensitive. Additionally, as indicated above, a majority of
the proposed changes align certain Sections in the Parent Bylaws with
current best practices and with the DCGL (as well as a change in
accordance with Delaware common law) and are also consistent with bylaw
provisions of Cboe's peer corporations. Accordingly, the Exchange
believes the proposed changes are widely accepted as appropriate
governance measures.
Lastly, the proposed nonsubstantive changes to the Parent Bylaws
provide additional clarity within the Parent Bylaws and make them
easier to understand. By making certain provisions read more in plain
English, updating paragraph lettering and numbering, making certain
terms uniform and simplifying language throughout, the proposed
nonsubstantive changes benefit investors by providing more clarity and
reduced complexity within the Parent Bylaws and making the Parent Bylaw
[sic] better organized and easier to follow thus reducing potential
investor confusion.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is
not intended to address competitive issues but rather is concerned
solely with updating the Parent Bylaws to reflect the changes described
above.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register or within such longer period up to 90 days (i) as the
Commission may designate if it finds such longer period to be
appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to
which the Exchange consents, the Commission will:
A. By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or
B. institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-037 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-037. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CboeEDGX-2020-037 and should be
submitted on or before September 9, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-18096 Filed 8-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P