Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Review, 50007-50008 [2020-17943]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 159 / Monday, August 17, 2020 / Notices
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Exporter or producer
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its Cross-Owned Affiliates 15 ......................................................................................
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................
Hefei JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................
Perlight Solar Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................................................................
Risen Energy Co., Ltd .........................................................................................................................................................................
Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................
Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................
Sunny Apex Development Limited ......................................................................................................................................................
Amended Cash Deposit Rates
Commerce will issue revised cash
deposit instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection for all firms
above that do not have a superseding
cash deposit rate (e.g., from a
subsequent administrative review). For
such firms, the revised cash deposit
rates will be the rates indicated above,
effective August 14, 2020.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 11, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–17942 Filed 8–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–570–980]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled Into
Modules, From the People’s Republic
of China: Notice of Court Decision Not
in Harmony With Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative
Review and Notice of Amended Final
Results of Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 4, 2020, the
United States Court of International
Trade (the Court) entered final judgment
sustaining the final results of remand
redetermination pursuant to court order
by the Department of Commerce
(Commerce) pertaining to the 2014
AGENCY:
15 See Final Results, 82 FR at 42793. Cross-owned
affiliates are: Trina Solar Limited; Trina Solar
(Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.;
Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.;
Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.;
Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina PV
Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
countervailing duty (CVD)
administrative review of the order on
crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells,
whether or not assembled into modules
(solar cells), from the People’s Republic
of China (China). Commerce is notifying
the public that the final judgment in this
case is not in harmony with Commerce’s
final results in the 2014 administrative
review of solar cells from China, and
that Commerce is amending the final
results.
DATES: Applicable August 14, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Caitlin Monks, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone:
(202) 482–2670.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 17, 2017, Commerce
published its final results of the 2014
administrative review of solar cells.1
Commerce reached affirmative
determinations for mandatory
respondents Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc. and its
cross-owned affiliates (collectively,
Canadian Solar) and Changzhou Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its crossowned affiliates (collectively, Trina
Solar), as well as numerous other
producers and exporters not selected for
individual review. On November 30,
2018, the Court remanded aspects of the
Final Results to Commerce for further
consideration.2 The Court remanded
1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells,
Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People’s Republic of China: Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and
Partial Rescission of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review; 2014, 82 FR 32678 (July 17,
2017) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum (IDM), as amended by
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or
Not Assembled into Modules, from the People’s
Republic of China: Amended Final Results of
Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, 82 FR
46760 (October 6, 2017) (Amended Final Results).
2 See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et
al. v. United States, Slip Op. 18–166 (November 30,
2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
50007
3.72
3.72
3.72
3.72
3.72
3.72
3.72
3.72
Commerce’s determinations as regards
to the Export Buyer’s Credit Program,
the inclusion of Comtrade data in
calculating the world market price for
aluminum extrusions and solar glass,
Commerce’s decision to revert to a tiertwo benchmark in determining the price
for polysilicon without considering a
respondent’s proffered evidence, and
the finding that the provision of
electricity constitutes a specific and
thus countervailable subsidy.3 In its first
remand redetermination, issued in April
2019,4 Commerce provided additional
explanation and evidence for its
determinations, but the Court continued
to find them unsupported by substantial
evidence and remanded them a second
time.5
In its second remand redetermination,
issued in February 2020,6 Commerce
explained that, although it continues to
believe that it is not possible to verify
whether respondents used the Export
Buyer’s Credit Program without the
cooperation of the Government of China
(GOC), it found the program not used,
under protest, to comply with the
Court’s order.7 Commerce also solicited
additional information for the solar
glass benchmark, and selected data from
PV Insights consistent with Commerce’s
preference for product specific monthly
data.8 For aluminum extrusions,
Commerce used the more productspecific annual data from IHS
exclusively rather than averaging them
with less specific monthly Comtrade
data, consistent with the Court’s order.9
3 Id.
at 44.
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et
al. v. United States, Court of International Trade
Consolidated Court No. 17–00198, ‘‘Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand,’’ dated
April 24, 2019.
5 See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United
States, Slip Op. 19–137 (November 8, 2019)
(Second Remand Order).
6 See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Consol. Court No. 17–00198; Slip
Op. 19–137 (November 8, 2019), ‘‘Final Results of
Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand,’’ dated
February 28, 2020 (Second Remand
Redetermination).
7 Id. at 11–12.
8 Id. at 13–14.
9 Id. at 12–13.
4 See
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
50008
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 159 / Monday, August 17, 2020 / Notices
For polysilicon, Commerce placed
additional information on the record
that supported its finding that the solar
grade polysilicon market in China is
distorted by government involvement.10
Finally, Commerce found, based on
adverse facts available, that the
provision of electricity for less-thanadequate remuneration is a regionally
specific subsidy program, based on the
GOC’s failure to explain the variation in
electricity prices between provinces.11
The Court sustained Commerce’s
second remand redetermination in
full.12 Specifically, the Court found that
Commerce’s determinations regarding
the Export Buyer’s Credit Program, as
well as the aluminum extrusions and
solar glass benchmarks, complied with
the options the Court provided in the
Second Remand Order.13 For
polysilicon, the Court explained that
Commerce reasonably identified further
evidence supporting its finding of
market distortion.14 Finally, the Court
found that Commerce appropriately
identified the missing information and
facts that, when combined with an
adverse inference, supported finding
that the provision of electricity is
regionally specific.15
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,16 as
clarified by Diamond Sawblades,17 the
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice
of court decision that is not ‘‘in
harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The
Court’s August 4, 2020, judgment
constitutes a final decision of that court
that is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Final Results and Amended Final
Results. This notice is published in
fulfillment of the publication
requirements of Timken. Accordingly,
Commerce will continue suspension of
liquidation of subject merchandise
pending expiration of the period of
appeal or, if appealed, pending a final
and conclusive court decision.
10 Id.
at 14–22.
at 22–24.
12 See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. v.
United States, Slip Op. 20–108 (August 4, 2020).
13 Id. at 4–8 (Export Buyer’s Credit Program) and
8–14 (benchmarks for aluminum extrusions and
solar glass).
14 Id. at 14–18.
15 Id. at 18–25.
16 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337
(Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
17 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
11 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 14, 2020
Jkt 250001
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court
decision, Commerce is amending the
Amended Final Results with respect to
Canadian Solar, Trina Solar, and all
other producers and exporters subject to
this review. The revised total subsidy
rates for Canadian Solar and Trina Solar
for the period January 1, 2014 through
December 31, 2014 are as follows: 18
Subsidy rate
(percent
ad valorem)
Exporter or producer
Canadian
Solar
Manufacturing
(Changshu) Inc. and its CrossOwned Affiliates 19 .......................
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co.,
Ltd. and its Cross-Owned Affiliates 20 ..........................................
BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd .......
ET Solar Energy Limited .................
ET Solar Industry Limited ...............
Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science
and Technology Co., Ltd .............
Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd ..............
Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co.,
Ltd ................................................
Lightway Green New Energy Co.,
Ltd ................................................
Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd ...
Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd ...............................
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ...................
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co. Ltd .....
Systemes Versilis, Inc .....................
Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd .............
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ........
Toenergy Technology Hangzhou
Co., Ltd ........................................
Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd .........
7.36
5.97
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
6.44
Amended Cash Deposit Rates
Dated: August 11, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–17943 Filed 8–14–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–351–842]
Certain Uncoated Paper From Brazil:
Partial Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Review; 2019–
2020
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is partially rescinding the
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on certain
uncoated paper (uncoated paper) from
Brazil for the period of review (POR)
March 1, 2019 through February 29,
2020.
AGENCY:
DATES:
Applicable August 17, 2020.
Jerry
Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4047.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
Commerce will issue revised cash
deposit instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection for all firms
above that do not have a superseding
cash deposit rate (e.g., from a
subsequent administrative review). For
such firms, the revised cash deposit
rates will be the rates indicated above,
effective August 14, 2020.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1),
751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Second Remand Redetermination at 48.
Final Results, 82 FR at 32680. Cross-owned
affiliates are: Canadian Solar Inc.; Canadian Solar
Manufacturing (Luoyang) Inc.; CSI Cells Co., Ltd.;
CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.; CSI Solartronics
(Changshu) Co., Ltd.; CSI Solar Technologies Inc.;
and CSI Solar Manufacture Inc.
20 Id. Cross-owned affiliates are: Trina Solar
Limited; Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science &
Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Solar Energy
Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar
Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina Solar Energy
Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and
Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co., Ltd.
On March 2, 2020, Commerce
published a notice of opportunity to
request an administrative review of the
antidumping duty order on uncoated
paper from Brazil.1 Pursuant to requests
from interested parties, Commerce
initiated an administrative review with
respect to three companies, in
accordance with section 751(a) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act).2 Subsequent to the initiation of the
administrative review, the petitioners 3
timely withdrew their request for an
administrative review of two
companies, as discussed below. No
18 See
19 See
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1 See Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order,
Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 85 FR 12267
(March 2, 2020).
2 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 85 FR
26931 (May 6, 2020) (Initiation Notice).
3 Collectively, the petitioners are: Domtar
Corporation, P.H. Glatfelter Company, Packaging
Corporation of America, and the United Steel, Paper
and Forestry, Rubber, Manufacturing, Energy,
Allied Industrial and Service Workers International
Union, AFL–CIO, CLC.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 159 (Monday, August 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 50007-50008]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17943]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-570-980]
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Countervailing Duty
Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results of Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On August 4, 2020, the United States Court of International
Trade (the Court) entered final judgment sustaining the final results
of remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the 2014 countervailing duty (CVD)
administrative review of the order on crystalline silicon photovoltaic
cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the
People's Republic of China (China). Commerce is notifying the public
that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's
final results in the 2014 administrative review of solar cells from
China, and that Commerce is amending the final results.
DATES: Applicable August 14, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caitlin Monks, AD/CVD Operations,
Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2670.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On July 17, 2017, Commerce published its final results of the 2014
administrative review of solar cells.\1\ Commerce reached affirmative
determinations for mandatory respondents Canadian Solar Manufacturing
(Changshu) Inc. and its cross-owned affiliates (collectively, Canadian
Solar) and Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its cross-owned
affiliates (collectively, Trina Solar), as well as numerous other
producers and exporters not selected for individual review. On November
30, 2018, the Court remanded aspects of the Final Results to Commerce
for further consideration.\2\ The Court remanded Commerce's
determinations as regards to the Export Buyer's Credit Program, the
inclusion of Comtrade data in calculating the world market price for
aluminum extrusions and solar glass, Commerce's decision to revert to a
tier-two benchmark in determining the price for polysilicon without
considering a respondent's proffered evidence, and the finding that the
provision of electricity constitutes a specific and thus
countervailable subsidy.\3\ In its first remand redetermination, issued
in April 2019,\4\ Commerce provided additional explanation and evidence
for its determinations, but the Court continued to find them
unsupported by substantial evidence and remanded them a second time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not
Assembled into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final
Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review, and Partial
Rescission of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2014, 82 FR
32678 (July 17, 2017) (Final Results), and accompanying Issues and
Decision Memorandum (IDM), as amended by Crystalline Silicon
Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled into Modules, from the
People's Republic of China: Amended Final Results of Countervailing
Duty Administrative Review, 82 FR 46760 (October 6, 2017) (Amended
Final Results).
\2\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al. v. United
States, Slip Op. 18-166 (November 30, 2018).
\3\ Id. at 44.
\4\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. et al. v. United
States, Court of International Trade Consolidated Court No. 17-
00198, ``Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court
Remand,'' dated April 24, 2019.
\5\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co. v. United States, Slip
Op. 19-137 (November 8, 2019) (Second Remand Order).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In its second remand redetermination, issued in February 2020,\6\
Commerce explained that, although it continues to believe that it is
not possible to verify whether respondents used the Export Buyer's
Credit Program without the cooperation of the Government of China
(GOC), it found the program not used, under protest, to comply with the
Court's order.\7\ Commerce also solicited additional information for
the solar glass benchmark, and selected data from PV Insights
consistent with Commerce's preference for product specific monthly
data.\8\ For aluminum extrusions, Commerce used the more product-
specific annual data from IHS exclusively rather than averaging them
with less specific monthly Comtrade data, consistent with the Court's
order.\9\
[[Page 50008]]
For polysilicon, Commerce placed additional information on the record
that supported its finding that the solar grade polysilicon market in
China is distorted by government involvement.\10\ Finally, Commerce
found, based on adverse facts available, that the provision of
electricity for less-than-adequate remuneration is a regionally
specific subsidy program, based on the GOC's failure to explain the
variation in electricity prices between provinces.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. v. United States,
Consol. Court No. 17-00198; Slip Op. 19-137 (November 8, 2019),
``Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand,'' dated
February 28, 2020 (Second Remand Redetermination).
\7\ Id. at 11-12.
\8\ Id. at 13-14.
\9\ Id. at 12-13.
\10\ Id. at 14-22.
\11\ Id. at 22-24.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Court sustained Commerce's second remand redetermination in
full.\12\ Specifically, the Court found that Commerce's determinations
regarding the Export Buyer's Credit Program, as well as the aluminum
extrusions and solar glass benchmarks, complied with the options the
Court provided in the Second Remand Order.\13\ For polysilicon, the
Court explained that Commerce reasonably identified further evidence
supporting its finding of market distortion.\14\ Finally, the Court
found that Commerce appropriately identified the missing information
and facts that, when combined with an adverse inference, supported
finding that the provision of electricity is regionally specific.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. v. United
States, Slip Op. 20-108 (August 4, 2020).
\13\ Id. at 4-8 (Export Buyer's Credit Program) and 8-14
(benchmarks for aluminum extrusions and solar glass).
\14\ Id. at 14-18.
\15\ Id. at 18-25.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,\16\ as clarified by Diamond
Sawblades,\17\ the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that,
pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in
harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of
entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's August 4,
2020, judgment constitutes a final decision of that court that is not
in harmony with Commerce's Final Results and Amended Final Results.
This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements
of Timken. Accordingly, Commerce will continue suspension of
liquidation of subject merchandise pending expiration of the period of
appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir.
1990) (Timken).
\17\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Final Results
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending
the Amended Final Results with respect to Canadian Solar, Trina Solar,
and all other producers and exporters subject to this review. The
revised total subsidy rates for Canadian Solar and Trina Solar for the
period January 1, 2014 through December 31, 2014 are as follows: \18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See Second Remand Redetermination at 48.
\19\ See Final Results, 82 FR at 32680. Cross-owned affiliates
are: Canadian Solar Inc.; Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang)
Inc.; CSI Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI Solar Power (China) Inc.; CSI
Solartronics (Changshu) Co., Ltd.; CSI Solar Technologies Inc.; and
CSI Solar Manufacture Inc.
\20\ Id. Cross-owned affiliates are: Trina Solar Limited; Trina
Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina
Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang
Energy Co., Ltd.; Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina
Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and Changzhou Trina PV Ribbon Materials Co.,
Ltd.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subsidy rate
Exporter or producer (percent ad
valorem)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu) Inc. and its 7.36
Cross-Owned Affiliates \19\............................
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. and its Cross- 5.97
Owned Affiliates \20\..................................
BYD (Shangluo) Industrial Co., Ltd...................... 6.44
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd......................... 6.44
ET Solar Energy Limited................................. 6.44
ET Solar Industry Limited............................... 6.44
Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd... 6.44
Jiawei Solarchina Co., Ltd.............................. 6.44
Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd................... 6.44
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd...................... 6.44
Luoyang Suntech Power Co., Ltd.......................... 6.44
Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd........ 6.44
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd................................... 6.44
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co. Ltd........................... 6.44
Systemes Versilis, Inc.................................. 6.44
Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd............................... 6.44
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd........................... 6.44
Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd................... 6.44
Wuxi Suntech Power Co., Ltd............................. 6.44
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Amended Cash Deposit Rates
Commerce will issue revised cash deposit instructions to U.S.
Customs and Border Protection for all firms above that do not have a
superseding cash deposit rate (e.g., from a subsequent administrative
review). For such firms, the revised cash deposit rates will be the
rates indicated above, effective August 14, 2020.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections
516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: August 11, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-17943 Filed 8-14-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
