Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation; Notice of Filing of Advance Notice Concerning Proposed Changes To Enhance OCC's Stock Loan Close-Out Process, 49697-49701 [2020-17745]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 158 / Friday, August 14, 2020 / Notices
to be appropriate and publishes its
reasons for so finding, or as to which the
self-regulatory organization consents,
the Commission shall either approve the
proposed rule change, disapprove the
proposed rule change, or institute
proceedings to determine whether the
proposed rule change should be
disapproved. The 45th day after
publication of the notice for this
proposed rule change is August 13,
2020.
The Commission is extending this 45day time period. The Commission finds
that it is appropriate to designate a
longer period within which to take
action on the proposal so that it has
sufficient time to consider the proposed
rule change, as modified by Amendment
No. 1. Accordingly, the Commission,
pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7
designates September 27, 2020, as the
date by which the Commission shall
either approve or disapprove, or
institute proceedings to determine
whether to disapprove, the proposed
rule change (File No. SR–CBOE–2020–
055), as modified by Amendment No. 1.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.8
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–17756 Filed 8–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89515; File No. SR–OCC–
2020–805]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The
Options Clearing Corporation; Notice
of Filing of Advance Notice
Concerning Proposed Changes To
Enhance OCC’s Stock Loan Close-Out
Process
August 10, 2020.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title
VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street
Reform and Consumer Protection Act,
entitled Payment, Clearing and
Settlement Supervision Act of 2010
(‘‘Clearing Supervision Act’’) 1 and Rule
19b–4(n)(1)(i) 2 under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Exchange
Act’’),3 notice is hereby given that on
7 Id.
8 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(31).
U.S.C. 5465(e)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4(n)(1)(i).
3 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
1 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Aug 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
July 14, 2020, the Options Clearing
Corporation (‘‘OCC’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) an advance notice as
described in Items I, II and III below,
which Items have been prepared by
OCC. The Commission is publishing
this notice to solicit comments on the
advance notice from interested persons.
I. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Terms of Substance of the Advance
Notice
This advance notice is submitted in in
connection with proposed changes to
OCC Rules 2211 and 2211A, which
concern the close-out of a defaulting
Hedge Clearing Member’s or Market
Loan Clearing Member’s (each a
‘‘defaulting Clearing Member’’) stock
loan positions, respectively, to require
Lending Clearing Members or
Borrowing Clearing Members (each a
‘‘non-defaulting Clearing Member’’)
whom OCC instructs to buy-in or sellout securities to execute such
transactions and provide OCC notice of
such action by the settlement time for a
Clearing Member’s obligations to OCC
on the business day after OCC gives the
instruction.4 In addition, OCC proposes
to amend Rules 2211 and 2211A to
provide that if a non-defaulting Clearing
Member so instructed does not execute
the trades and provide notice by that
time, OCC will terminate the Stock Loan
and effect settlement based upon the
Marking Price at the close of business
on the day that OCC provided the
instruction. OCC submitted the
proposed amendments to OCC’s Rules
in Exhibit 5. Material proposed to be
added to OCC’s Rules as currently in
effect is marked by underlining and
material proposed to be deleted is
marked with strikethrough text. All
terms with initial capitalization that are
not otherwise defined herein have the
same meaning as set forth in the ByLaws and Rules.5
II. Clearing Agency’s Statement of the
Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the
Advance Notice
In its filing with the Commission,
OCC included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the advance
notice and discussed any comments it
4 ‘‘Buy-in’’ refers to a non-defaulting lender
purchasing replacement stock. ‘‘Sell-out’’ refers to
a non-defaulting borrower selling the loaned
securities in order to recoup its collateral.
5 OCC’s By-Laws and Rules can be found on
OCC’s public website: https://optionsclearing.com/
about/publications/bylaws.jsp.
PO 00000
Frm 00082
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49697
received on the advance notice. The text
of these statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
OCC has prepared summaries, set forth
in sections A and B below, of the most
significant aspects of these statements.
(A) Clearing Agency’s Statement on
Comments on the Advance Notice
Received From Members, Participants or
Others
Written comments were not and are
not intended to be solicited with respect
to the advance notice and none have
been received. OCC will notify the
Commission of any written comments
received by OCC.
(B) Advance Notices Filed Pursuant to
Section 806(e) of the Payment, Clearing,
and Settlement Supervision Act
Description of the Change
This advance notice concerns a
change to OCC’s operations to amend
OCC Rules 2211 and 2211A to ensure
that OCC has authority and operational
capacity to take timely action to contain
losses and liquidity demands and
continue to meet its obligations in the
event of a Clearing Member default by
more closely aligning the close-out of
stock loan positions through buy-in and
sell-out transactions with the timing of
an auction of a defaulting Clearing
Member’s other positions and to ensure
that the close-out of a defaulting
Clearing Member’s stock loan positions
by buy-in or sell-out transactions occurs
within OCC’s two-day liquidation
assumption. The proposed amendments
to the Rules are discussed in more detail
below.
Background
OCC operates two programs in which
it acts as a central counterparty for stock
loan transactions: (1) The Stock Loan/
Hedge Program and (2) Market Loan
Program (collectively, the ‘‘Stock Loan
Programs’’). Stock Loan/Hedge Program
transactions are initiated directly
between Clearing Members on a
bilateral basis (i.e., ‘‘broker-to-broker’’
model) and Market Loan Program
transactions are initiated on either a
broker-to-broker basis or anonymously
through the matching of bids and offers
(i.e., ‘‘market’’ model). Both programs
rely on The Depository Trust Company
(‘‘DTC’’) to facilitate the settlement of
equity securities and cash collateral
between members.
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
49698
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 158 / Friday, August 14, 2020 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Under the Stock Loan Programs, OCC
novates the transaction and becomes the
lender to the Borrowing Clearing
Member and the borrower to the
Lending Clearing Member upon
receiving reports from DTC showing
completed Stock Loans, provided that
OCC has not rejected such transactions.6
As the principal counterparty to the
Borrowing and Lending Clearing
Members, OCC guarantees the return of
the full value of cash collateral to a
Borrowing Clearing Member and
guarantees the return of the Loaned
Stock (or value of that Loaned Stock) to
the Lending Clearing Member.7 After
novation, as part of the guaranty, OCC
makes Mark-to-Market Payments for all
cleared Stock Loans on a daily basis to
collateralize all loans to the negotiated
levels. Settlements generally are
combined and netted against other OCC
settlement obligations in a Clearing
Member’s account, including trade
premiums and margin deficits. Clearing
Member open positions in the Stock
Loan Programs are factored into the
Clearing Member’s overall Margin 8 and
Clearing Fund contribution
requirements.9
In the event a Clearing Member
defaults, OCC closes the defaulting
Clearing Member’s positions, liquidates
collateral, and deposits any proceeds
into a Liquidating Settlement Account.
The close-out of positions other than
stock loan positions would typically be
effected by an auction that would occur
on the morning prior to market opening
on the day after a default occurs.10 In
contrast, OCC’s Rules allow OCC to
close stock loan positions by instructing
the non-defaulting Clearing Members
who are parties to the defaulting
Clearing Member’s loans to sell-out or
buy-in securities as applicable.11 A non6 See OCC Rules 2202(b) and 2202A(b). OCC
receives DTC confirmation upon settlement of
delivery versus payment. See generally DTC
Settlement Services Guide, available at https://
www.dtcc.com/∼/media/Files/Downloads/legal/
service-guides/Settlement.pdf (discussing the
operation of the ‘‘Option Exercise & Assignment
Loan Program’’).
7 Under the Market Loan Program, OCC also
provides a limited guaranty of dividend and rebate
payments.
8 See OCC Rules 601 and 2203.
9 See OCC Rule 1001.
10 While this timing describes the typical
scenario, the timing of an auction is not set by
regulation or OCC’s By-Laws or Rules, which allows
for an auction on an accelerated timeline, if needed.
In addition, OCC’s Rules also allow for the closeout of a defaulting Clearing Member’s portfolio by
open market transactions and hedging transactions
to reduce the risks to OCC associated with holding
open positions. See OCC Rule 1106.
11 OCC may also effect the close-out of stock loan
positions by re-matching Matched-Book Positions,
an auction, or in such other manner as OCC
determines to be the most orderly manner
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Aug 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
defaulting Clearing Member is required
to provide OCC with evidence of the
execution price at which each
transaction occurred. This execution
price is used as the settlement price to
facilitate the final mark between the
non-defaulting Clearing Member and the
Liquidating Settlement Account.
Currently, non-defaulting Clearing
Members are required to buy-in or sellout the relevant securities by the close
of business on the stock loan business
day after OCC’s instruction.12 If a nondefaulting Clearing Member fails to
execute such buy-in or sell-out, OCC
would terminate the stock loan position
and mark the transaction based upon
the Marking Price at close of business
on the business day after OCC’s
instruction.13
The buy-in/sell-out process for stock
loan positions has significant benefits as
it distributes the liquidity demands
across multiple counterparties, each of
whom effectively act as independent
liquidating agents. The buy-in/sell-out
process also aligns the liquidity
demands necessary to facilitate an
unwind with the Clearing Member
receiving proceeds from the origination
of the loan and currently in possession
of the collateral. However, the
difference in timing between an auction
and the buy-in/sell-out process presents
credit and liquidity risks for OCC.
Specifically, because OCC’s portfoliobased margin methodology combines
stock loan positions with options,
futures, and margin collateral when
determining margin requirements, the
difference in timing could expose OCC
to increased credit and liquidity risk
should the price of the stock loan
positions move unfavorably between the
time of auction and determination of the
final settlement price for remaining buyin/sell-out transactions and should that
price differential exceed the amount of
margin on deposit for such positions.
Enhancement to Stock Loan Programs
Close-Out Rules
In response to these concerns, OCC
proposes to amend OCC Rules 2211 and
2211A to require buy-in or sell-out
transactions to be complete by the
settlement time for a Clearing Member’s
obligations to OCC, defined in Article I
of the By-Laws,14 on the stock loan
practicable under the circumstances. OCC Rules
2210(b) and 2210A(b).
12 See OCC Rules 2211 (Suspension of Hedge
Clearing Members—Buy-In and Sell-Out
Procedures) and 2211A (Suspension of Market Loan
Clearing Members—Buy-In and Sell-Out
Procedures).
13 Id.
14 By-Law Article I, Section 1.S.(16) defines
‘‘settlement time’’ with respect of a Clearing
PO 00000
Frm 00083
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
business day after OCC gives nondefaulting Clearing Members the buy-in/
sell-out instruction. If a non-defaulting
Clearing Member does not execute the
trades and provide notice by that time,
OCC would terminate the Stock Loan
and effect settlement based upon the
Marking Price at the close of business
the previous business day (i.e., the day
that OCC provided the instruction). This
Marking Price (i.e., closing price) would
be the last settlement price captured in
OCC’s systems prior to the time by
which the non-defaulting Clearing
Member was supposed to have taken
such actions.
This proposed enhancement is
designed to mitigate the risks associated
with the difference in timing between
close-out of stock loan positions and an
auction for the remainder of defaulting
Clearing Member’s portfolio. In the
typical case, an auction to close
positions for other products would
occur on the morning prior to market
opening on the day after a default event
occurs. Accelerating the deadline for
buy-in or sell-out transactions to that
morning—rather than the end of the
stock loan business day—would reduce
credit and liquidity risks by aligning
liquidation timing across products more
closely.
The proposed enhancement also is
designed to ensure that the close-out
process for the Stock Loan Programs
would occur in a manner consistent
with OCC’s two-day liquidation
assumption (which is applicable to all
products without differentiation). At the
earliest, a defaulting Clearing Member
would have made its last margin
payment at the settlement time on the
business day prior to default. When that
Clearing Member fails to make its
margin or mark-to-market payments the
next morning, OCC would suspend it
and typically would issue the buy-in/
sell-out instruction to non-defaulting
Clearing Members. The proposed
requirement that non-defaulting
Clearing Members execute buy-in and
sell-out transactions by the settlement
time on the business day after default
ensures that close-out occurs in a
manner consistent with the two-day
liquidation assumption.
OCC considered requiring nondefaulting Clearing Members to execute
buy-in or sell-out transactions by the
end of the business day on the same day
as OCC’s instruction but believes
extending the process to the following
morning is the better option. In
discussion with several Clearing
Members, they expressed a preference
Member’s obligations to OCC to mean 9:00 a.m.
Central Time.
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 158 / Friday, August 14, 2020 / Notices
for setting the deadline at 9:00 a.m.
Central Time the following business day
because doing so would allow a nondefaulting Clearing Member the
opportunity to trade at market opening.
OCC believes allowing non-defaulting
Clearing Members to trade at market
opening the following morning would
provide additional time to execute the
buy-in and sell-out method in a manner
consistent with OCC’s two-day
liquidation assumption.15 OCC also
presented the proposed change at a
meeting of its Financial Risk Advisory
Council (‘‘FRAC’’), a working group
comprised of exchanges, Clearing
Members and other market
participants.16 No participant objected
to OCC’s proposal to accelerate the
close-out timing. While questions were
raised about the proposal to use the
Marking Price at the close of business
the day prior in the event a Clearing
Member fails to act by the settlement
time the next day, OCC believes using
the last Marking Price available in its
system prior to the time by which a
Clearing Member is obligated to take
action is superior because OCC’s
automated systems are designed to
determine the Marking Price based on
closing securities prices. The manual
processes that OCC would need to
institute to pull pricing information
other than closing prices would make
the stock loan close-out process more
susceptible to delay and errors.
Implementation Timeframe
OCC expects to implement the
proposed changes within thirty (30)
days after the date that OCC receives all
necessary regulatory approvals for the
proposed changes. OCC will announce
the implementation date of the
proposed change by an Information
Memorandum posted to its public
website at least one (1) weeks prior to
implementation.
Anticipated Effect on and Management
of Risk
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
OCC believes that the proposed
changes would reduce the nature and
level of risk presented by OCC because
they would enhance the overall
resilience of OCC’s Stock Loan Programs
by enhancing the default management
processes for the Stock Loan Programs
15 OCC is considering a proposal to move its
settlement time from 9:00 a.m. settlement time
earlier in the day, in which case the deadline for
a non-defaulting Clearing Member instructed to
buy-in or sell-out would change to the new
settlement time.
16 OCC submitted the relevant portions of the
presentation provided at the April 16, 2019 FRAC
meeting in confidential Exhibit 3.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
21:48 Aug 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
to mitigate the risks associated with the
buy-in/sell-out described above.
OCC proposes to amend OCC Rules
2211 and 2211A to require buy-in or
sell-out transactions to be complete by
the settlement time for a Clearing
Member’s obligations to OCC, defined in
Article I of the By-Laws,17 on the stock
loan business day after OCC gives nondefaulting Clearing Members the buy-in/
sell-out instruction. If a non-defaulting
Clearing Member does not execute the
trades and provide notice by that time,
OCC would terminate the Stock Loan
and effect settlement based upon the
Marking Price at the close of business
the previous business day (i.e., the day
that OCC provided the instruction).
OCC believes the proposed changes
help to mitigate the risks associated
with the difference in timing between
close-out of stock loan positions and an
auction for the remainder of defaulting
Clearing Member’s portfolio. In the
typical case, an auction to close
positions for other products would
occur on the morning prior to market
opening on the day after a default event
occurs. Accelerating the deadline for
buy-in or sell-out transactions to that
morning—rather than the end of the
stock loan business day—would reduce
credit and liquidity risks by aligning
liquidation timing across products more
closely. OCC also believes the proposed
changes helps to mitigate credit risks by
ensuring that the close-out process for
the Stock Loan Programs would occur in
a manner consistent with OCC’s twoday liquidation assumption (which is
applicable to all products without
differentiation). In addition, OCC
believes using the last Marking Price
available in its system prior to the time
by which a Clearing Member is
obligated to take action helps manage
risk in situations where a Clearing
Member fails to take action because
OCC’s automated systems are designed
to determine the Marking Price based on
closing securities prices. The manual
processes that OCC would need to
institute to pull pricing information
other than closing prices would make
the stock loan close-out process more
susceptible to delay and errors.
The stated purpose of the Clearing
Supervision Act is to mitigate systemic
risk in the financial system and promote
financial stability by, among other
things, promoting uniform risk
17 By-Law Article I, Section 1.S.(16) defines
‘‘settlement time’’ with respect of a Clearing
Member’s obligations to OCC to mean 9:00 a.m.
Central Time.
PO 00000
Frm 00084
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
management standards for systemically
important financial market utilities and
strengthening the liquidity of
systemically important financial market
utilities.18 Section 805(a)(2) of the
Clearing Supervision Act 19 also
authorizes the Commission to prescribe
risk management standards for the
payment, clearing and settlement
activities of designated clearing entities,
like OCC, for which the Commission is
the supervisory agency. Section 805(b)
of the Clearing Supervision Act 20 states
that the objectives and principles for
risk management standards prescribed
under Section 805(a) shall be to:
• Promote robust risk management;
• promote safety and soundness;
• reduce systemic risks; and
• support the stability of the broader
financial system.
The Commission has adopted risk
management standards under Section
805(a)(2) of the Clearing Supervision
Act and the Exchange Act in furtherance
of these objectives and principles.21
Rule 17Ad–22 requires registered
clearing agencies, like OCC, to establish,
implement, maintain, and enforce
written policies and procedures that are
reasonably designed to meet certain
minimum requirements for their
operations and risk management
practices on an ongoing basis.22
Therefore, the Commission has stated 23
that it believes it is appropriate to
review changes proposed in advance
notices against Rule 17Ad–22 and the
objectives and principles of these risk
management standards as described in
Section 805(b) of the Clearing
Supervision Act.24
OCC believes the proposed changes
are consistent with the objectives and
principles of Section 805(b) of the
Clearing Supervision Act.25 The
proposed changes are generally
designed to enhance OCC’s overall
framework for managing member
defaults by mitigating credit and
liquidity risks associated with the
difference in timing between the closeout of a defaulting Clearing Member’s
stock loan positions with the auction of
the remainder of its positions and
18 12
U.S.C. 5461(b).
U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
20 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
21 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22. See Exchange Act
Release Nos. 68080 (October 22, 2012), 77 FR 66220
(November 2, 2012) (S7–08–11) (‘‘Clearing Agency
Standards’’); 78961 (September 28, 2016), 81 FR
70786 (October 13, 2016) (S7–03–14) (‘‘Standards
for Covered Clearing Agencies’’).
22 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22.
23 See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 86182 (June
24, 2019), 84 FR 31128, 31129 (June 28, 2019) (SR–
OCC–2019–803).
24 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
25 Id.
19 12
Consistency With the Clearing
Supervision Act
49699
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
49700
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 158 / Friday, August 14, 2020 / Notices
ensuring that the close-out occurs
within OCC’s two-day liquidation time
horizon. These proposed changes would
help OCC avoid credit losses or
liquidity shortfalls that could disrupt
OCC’s operations. In this way, OCC
believes that the proposed
enhancements to its overall framework
for managing liquidity risk would
improve OCC’s resilience as a
systemically important market utility by
promoting robust risk management;
promoting safety and soundness;
reducing systemic risks; and supporting
the stability of the broader financial
system.
OCC also believes that the proposed
changes are consistent with the risk
management standards adopted by the
Commission under Section 805(a)(2) of
the Clearing Supervision Act; 26
specifically, Rule 17Ad–22(e)(13) 27 and
Rule 17Ad–22(e)(23).28 Rule 17Ad–
22(e)(13) requires covered clearing
agencies to establish, implement,
maintain and enforce written policies
and procedures reasonably designed to,
in part, ensure the covered clearing
agency has the authority and
operational capacity to take timely
action to contain losses and liquidity
demands and continue to meet its
obligations in the event of a Clearing
Member default.29 By more closely
aligning the close-out of stock loan
positions with the close-out of other
positions, these proposed changes to
OCC’s default management processes
would help mitigate credit and liquidity
risks should the price of the stock loan
positions move unfavorably between the
time of auction and determination of the
final settlement price for remaining buyin/sell-out transactions and should that
price differential exceed the amount of
margin on deposit for such positions. In
addition, the proposed changes would
give OCC the authority and operational
capacity to take timely action to contain
credit losses by authorizing OCC to cash
settle positions by the close of OCC’s
two-day liquidation time horizon
should a non-defaulting Clearing
Member fail to report buy-in or sell-out
transactions as instructed. For these
reasons, OCC believes the proposed
changes are reasonably designed to
ensure that OCC’s default management
processes contain losses and liquidity
demands and continue to meet
settlement demands in the event of a
Clearing Member default.
In addition, Rule 17Ad–22(e)(23)
requires covered clearing agencies to
U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(13).
28 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23)
29 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(13).
maintain written policies and
procedures reasonably designed to,
among other things, provide for publicly
disclosing all relevant rules and
material procedures, including key
aspects of its default rules and
procedures.30 The proposed changes
would amend OCC’s Rules, which are
available on OCC’s websites, to provide
for the new deadline for non-defaulting
Clearing Members to buy-in or sell-out
if so instructed by OCC in the event of
a Clearing Member default, as well as
how OCC would close out a stock loan
position if a non-defaulting Clearing
Member failed to do so. Therefore, OCC
believes the proposed changes would
disclose default rules and procedures to
the public and to Clearing Members so
that they can understand their
obligations in the event of a Clearing
Member default.
For the foregoing reasons, OCC
believes that the proposed changes are
consistent with Section 805(b) of the
Clearing Supervision Act 31 and Rules
17Ad–22(e)(13) 32 and (e)(23) 33 under
the Exchange Act.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Advance
Notice and Timing for Commission
Action
The proposed change may be
implemented if the Commission does
not object to the proposed change
within 60 days of the later of (i) the date
the proposed change was filed with the
Commission or (ii) the date any
additional information requested by the
Commission is received. OCC shall not
implement the proposed change if the
Commission has any objection to the
proposed change.
The Commission may extend the
period for review by an additional 60
days if the proposed change raises novel
or complex issues, subject to the
Commission providing the clearing
agency with prompt written notice of
the extension. A proposed change may
be implemented in less than 60 days
from the date the advance notice is
filed, or the date further information
requested by the Commission is
received, if the Commission notifies the
clearing agency in writing that it does
not object to the proposed change and
authorizes the clearing agency to
implement the proposed change on an
earlier date, subject to any conditions
imposed by the Commission.
OCC shall post notice on its website
of proposed changes that are
implemented. The proposal shall not
26 12
30 17
27 17
31 12
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Aug 13, 2020
CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23).
U.S.C. 5464(b).
32 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(7).
33 17 CFR 240.17Ad–22(e)(23).
Jkt 250001
PO 00000
Frm 00085
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
take effect until all regulatory actions
required with respect to the proposal are
completed.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the advance notice is
consistent with the Clearing
Supervision Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following
methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
OCC–2020–805 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2020–805. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the advance notice that
are filed with the Commission, and all
written communications relating to the
advance notice between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549 on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the self-regulatory organization.
All comments received will be posted
without change. Persons submitting
comments are cautioned that we do not
redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions.
You should submit only information
that you wish to make available
publicly.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–OCC–2020–805 and should
be submitted on or before August 31,
2020.
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 158 / Friday, August 14, 2020 / Notices
By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
of those statements may be examined at
the places specified in Item IV below.
The Exchange has prepared summaries,
set forth in sections A, B, and C below,
of the most significant parts of such
statements.
[FR Doc. 2020–17745 Filed 8–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and the
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89511; File No. SR–
NYSEArca–2020–72]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE
Arca, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed
Rule Change Relating to Certain
Changes Regarding the Underlying
Benchmark for the ProShares Ultra
Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF and
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg
Crude Oil ETF
August 10, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3
notice is hereby given that, on July 31,
2020, NYSE Arca, Inc. (‘‘NYSE Arca’’ or
the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the self-regulatory organization. The
Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule
change from interested persons.
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes certain
changes regarding the underlying
benchmark for the ProShares Ultra
Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF and
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude
Oil ETF, which are currently listed and
traded on the Exchange under NYSE
Arca Rule 8.200–E (Trust Issued
Receipts). The proposed rule change is
available on the Exchange’s website at
www.nyse.com, at the principal office of
the Exchange, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
self-regulatory organization included
statements concerning the purpose of,
and basis for, the proposed rule change
and discussed any comments it received
on the proposed rule change. The text
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
U.S.C. 78a.
3 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
2 15
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:29 Aug 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
1. Purpose
The Exchange currently lists and
trades shares of the ProShares Ultra
Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF and
ProShares UltraShort Bloomberg Crude
Oil ETF (each a ‘‘Fund’’ and, together,
the ‘‘Funds’’) under NYSE Arca Rule
8.200–E (Trust Issued Receipts). The
Exchange proposes certain changes
regarding the benchmark index
underlying the Funds. Shares of the
Funds initially were approved for listing
on the American Stock Exchange LLC
(‘‘Amex’’) in 2008,4 and were
subsequently listed on the Exchange in
2008.5
The Funds are series of the ProShares
Trust II (‘‘Trust’’).6 ProShare Capital
Management LLC (‘‘Managing Owner’’
or ‘‘Sponsor’’) serves as the commodity
pool operator for each Fund. The
Managing Owner is registered as a
commodity pool operator with the
Commodity Futures Trading
Commission, and with the National
Futures Association. The Funds were
identified in the Prior Amex Releases as
the Ultra DJ–AIG Crude Oil ProShares
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 57932
(June 5, 2008), 73 FR 33467 (June 12, 2008) (SR–
Amex–2008–39) (Notice of Filing of Proposed Rule
Change and Amendment No. 1 thereto Relating to
the Listing and Trading of Trust Issued Receipts
that Directly Hold Investments in Certain Financial
Instruments and to Permit the Listing and Trading
of Shares of Fourteen Funds of the Commodities
and Currency Trust) (‘‘Prior Amex Notice’’); 58161
(July 15, 2008), 73 FR 42380 (July 21, 2008) (SR–
Amex–2008–39) (Order Granting Approval of
Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by Amendment
No. 1 Thereto, Relating to the Listing and Trading
of Trust Issued Receipts that Directly Hold
Investments in Certain Financial Instruments and to
Permit the Listing and Trading of Shares of
Fourteen Funds of the Commodities and Currency
Trust) (‘‘Prior Amex Order’’ and, together with the
Prior Amex Notice, the ‘‘Prior Amex Releases’’).
5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58457
(September 3, 2008), 73 FR 52711 (September 10,
2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2008–91) (Notice of Filing
and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of
Proposed Rule Change Regarding the Listing of
Fourteen Funds of the Commodities and Currency
Trust).
6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58647
(September 25, 2008), 73 FR 57399 (October 2,
2008) (SR–NYSEArca–2008–99) (Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule
Change Relating to the ProShares Trust II) (‘‘Prior
NYSE Arca Notice’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00086
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
49701
and UltraShort DJAIG Crude Oil
ProShares, respectively.7
The Prior Amex Releases stated that
the Ultra DJ–AIG Crude Oil ProShares
(now known as the ProShares Ultra
Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF) seeks daily
investment results, before fees and
expenses, that correspond to twice
(200%) the daily performance of the
Fund’s underlying benchmark
(described below); and the UltraShort
DJ–AIG Crude Oil ProShares (now
known as ProShares UltraShort
Bloomberg Crude Oil ETF) seeks daily
investment results, before fees and
expenses, that correspond to twice the
inverse (-200%) of the daily
performance of the Fund’s underlying
benchmark. The Prior Amex Releases
stated that the Funds may hold any
combination of investments, including
cash, securities, options on securities
and indices, commodities, futures
contracts, options on futures contracts,
forward contracts, equity caps, collars,
and floors, and swap agreements
(collectively, ‘‘Financial Instruments’’).
The Funds’ Current Benchmark
The Funds’ underlying benchmark
(‘‘Current Benchmark’’) was identified
in the Prior Amex Releases as the Dow
Jones-AIG Crude Oil Sub-Index Excess
Return. The Dow Jones-AIG Crude Oil
Sub-Index Excess Return was renamed
the Bloomberg WTI Crude Oil Subindex
as of July 1, 2014, after Bloomberg
7 The Commission has previously approved
listing of Trust Issued Receipts based on oil on the
Amex and NYSE Arca. See, e.g., Securities
Exchange Act Release Nos. 53582 (March 31, 2006),
71 FR 17510 (April 6, 2006) (SR–Amex–2005–127)
(order approving listing and trading of shares of
United States Oil Fund, LP); 57188 (January 23,
2008), 73 FR 5607 (January 30, 2008) (SR–Amex–
2007–70) (order approving listing and trading of
shares of United States Heating Oil Fund, LP and
United States Gasoline Fund, LP); 61881 (April 9,
2010), 75 FR 20028 (April 16, 2010) (SR–
NYSEArca–2010–14) (order approving listing and
trading of shares of United States Brent Oil Fund,
LP); 62527 (July 19, 2010), 75 FR 4360 (July 26,
2010) (order approving listing and trading of shares
of United States Commodity Index Fund); 81655
(September 19, 2017), 82 FR 44678) (September 25,
2017) (SR–NYSEArca–2016–177) (Notice of Filing
of Amendment No. 4, and Order Granting
Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change,
as Modified by Amendment No. 4, Relating to the
Listing and Trading of Shares of the USCF Canadian
Crude Oil Index Fund Under NYSE Arca Rule
8.200–E); 81686 (September 22, 2017), 82 FR 45643
(September 29, 2017) (SR–NYSEArca–2017–05)
(Order Granting Approval of a Proposed Rule
Change, as Modified by Amendment Nos. 2 and 3
Thereto, to List and Trade Shares of Direxion Daily
Crude Oil Bull 3x Shares and Direxion Daily Crude
Oil Bear 3x Shares under NYSE Arca Equities Rule
8.200); 80427 (April 11, 2017), 82 FR 18058 (April
14, 2017) (SR–NYSEArca–2016–173) (Order
Approving a Proposed Rule Change, as Modified by
Amendments No. 2 and No. 3 Thereto, To List and
Trade Shares of the United States 3x Oil Fund and
United States 3x Short Oil Fund Under NYSE Arca
Equities Rule 8.200, Commentary .02).
E:\FR\FM\14AUN1.SGM
14AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 158 (Friday, August 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 49697-49701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17745]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-89515; File No. SR-OCC-2020-805]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Options Clearing Corporation;
Notice of Filing of Advance Notice Concerning Proposed Changes To
Enhance OCC's Stock Loan Close-Out Process
August 10, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 806(e)(1) of Title VIII of the Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, entitled Payment, Clearing
and Settlement Supervision Act of 2010 (``Clearing Supervision Act'')
\1\ and Rule 19b-4(n)(1)(i) \2\ under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 (``Exchange Act''),\3\ notice is hereby given that on July 14,
2020, the Options Clearing Corporation (``OCC'') filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission (``Commission'') an advance notice
as described in Items I, II and III below, which Items have been
prepared by OCC. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the advance notice from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 12 U.S.C. 5465(e)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(n)(1)(i).
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78a et seq.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Advance
Notice
This advance notice is submitted in in connection with proposed
changes to OCC Rules 2211 and 2211A, which concern the close-out of a
defaulting Hedge Clearing Member's or Market Loan Clearing Member's
(each a ``defaulting Clearing Member'') stock loan positions,
respectively, to require Lending Clearing Members or Borrowing Clearing
Members (each a ``non-defaulting Clearing Member'') whom OCC instructs
to buy-in or sell-out securities to execute such transactions and
provide OCC notice of such action by the settlement time for a Clearing
Member's obligations to OCC on the business day after OCC gives the
instruction.\4\ In addition, OCC proposes to amend Rules 2211 and 2211A
to provide that if a non-defaulting Clearing Member so instructed does
not execute the trades and provide notice by that time, OCC will
terminate the Stock Loan and effect settlement based upon the Marking
Price at the close of business on the day that OCC provided the
instruction. OCC submitted the proposed amendments to OCC's Rules in
Exhibit 5. Material proposed to be added to OCC's Rules as currently in
effect is marked by underlining and material proposed to be deleted is
marked with strikethrough text. All terms with initial capitalization
that are not otherwise defined herein have the same meaning as set
forth in the By-Laws and Rules.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``Buy-in'' refers to a non-defaulting lender purchasing
replacement stock. ``Sell-out'' refers to a non-defaulting borrower
selling the loaned securities in order to recoup its collateral.
\5\ OCC's By-Laws and Rules can be found on OCC's public
website: https://optionsclearing.com/about/publications/bylaws.jsp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Clearing Agency's Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis
for, the Advance Notice
In its filing with the Commission, OCC included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the advance notice and
discussed any comments it received on the advance notice. The text of
these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV
below. OCC has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A and B below,
of the most significant aspects of these statements.
(A) Clearing Agency's Statement on Comments on the Advance Notice
Received From Members, Participants or Others
Written comments were not and are not intended to be solicited with
respect to the advance notice and none have been received. OCC will
notify the Commission of any written comments received by OCC.
(B) Advance Notices Filed Pursuant to Section 806(e) of the Payment,
Clearing, and Settlement Supervision Act
Description of the Change
This advance notice concerns a change to OCC's operations to amend
OCC Rules 2211 and 2211A to ensure that OCC has authority and
operational capacity to take timely action to contain losses and
liquidity demands and continue to meet its obligations in the event of
a Clearing Member default by more closely aligning the close-out of
stock loan positions through buy-in and sell-out transactions with the
timing of an auction of a defaulting Clearing Member's other positions
and to ensure that the close-out of a defaulting Clearing Member's
stock loan positions by buy-in or sell-out transactions occurs within
OCC's two-day liquidation assumption. The proposed amendments to the
Rules are discussed in more detail below.
Background
OCC operates two programs in which it acts as a central
counterparty for stock loan transactions: (1) The Stock Loan/Hedge
Program and (2) Market Loan Program (collectively, the ``Stock Loan
Programs''). Stock Loan/Hedge Program transactions are initiated
directly between Clearing Members on a bilateral basis (i.e., ``broker-
to-broker'' model) and Market Loan Program transactions are initiated
on either a broker-to-broker basis or anonymously through the matching
of bids and offers (i.e., ``market'' model). Both programs rely on The
Depository Trust Company (``DTC'') to facilitate the settlement of
equity securities and cash collateral between members.
[[Page 49698]]
Under the Stock Loan Programs, OCC novates the transaction and
becomes the lender to the Borrowing Clearing Member and the borrower to
the Lending Clearing Member upon receiving reports from DTC showing
completed Stock Loans, provided that OCC has not rejected such
transactions.\6\ As the principal counterparty to the Borrowing and
Lending Clearing Members, OCC guarantees the return of the full value
of cash collateral to a Borrowing Clearing Member and guarantees the
return of the Loaned Stock (or value of that Loaned Stock) to the
Lending Clearing Member.\7\ After novation, as part of the guaranty,
OCC makes Mark-to-Market Payments for all cleared Stock Loans on a
daily basis to collateralize all loans to the negotiated levels.
Settlements generally are combined and netted against other OCC
settlement obligations in a Clearing Member's account, including trade
premiums and margin deficits. Clearing Member open positions in the
Stock Loan Programs are factored into the Clearing Member's overall
Margin \8\ and Clearing Fund contribution requirements.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See OCC Rules 2202(b) and 2202A(b). OCC receives DTC
confirmation upon settlement of delivery versus payment. See
generally DTC Settlement Services Guide, available at https://
www.dtcc.com/~/media/Files/Downloads/legal/service-guides/
Settlement.pdf (discussing the operation of the ``Option Exercise &
Assignment Loan Program'').
\7\ Under the Market Loan Program, OCC also provides a limited
guaranty of dividend and rebate payments.
\8\ See OCC Rules 601 and 2203.
\9\ See OCC Rule 1001.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the event a Clearing Member defaults, OCC closes the defaulting
Clearing Member's positions, liquidates collateral, and deposits any
proceeds into a Liquidating Settlement Account. The close-out of
positions other than stock loan positions would typically be effected
by an auction that would occur on the morning prior to market opening
on the day after a default occurs.\10\ In contrast, OCC's Rules allow
OCC to close stock loan positions by instructing the non-defaulting
Clearing Members who are parties to the defaulting Clearing Member's
loans to sell-out or buy-in securities as applicable.\11\ A non-
defaulting Clearing Member is required to provide OCC with evidence of
the execution price at which each transaction occurred. This execution
price is used as the settlement price to facilitate the final mark
between the non-defaulting Clearing Member and the Liquidating
Settlement Account. Currently, non-defaulting Clearing Members are
required to buy-in or sell-out the relevant securities by the close of
business on the stock loan business day after OCC's instruction.\12\ If
a non-defaulting Clearing Member fails to execute such buy-in or sell-
out, OCC would terminate the stock loan position and mark the
transaction based upon the Marking Price at close of business on the
business day after OCC's instruction.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ While this timing describes the typical scenario, the
timing of an auction is not set by regulation or OCC's By-Laws or
Rules, which allows for an auction on an accelerated timeline, if
needed. In addition, OCC's Rules also allow for the close-out of a
defaulting Clearing Member's portfolio by open market transactions
and hedging transactions to reduce the risks to OCC associated with
holding open positions. See OCC Rule 1106.
\11\ OCC may also effect the close-out of stock loan positions
by re-matching Matched-Book Positions, an auction, or in such other
manner as OCC determines to be the most orderly manner practicable
under the circumstances. OCC Rules 2210(b) and 2210A(b).
\12\ See OCC Rules 2211 (Suspension of Hedge Clearing Members--
Buy-In and Sell-Out Procedures) and 2211A (Suspension of Market Loan
Clearing Members--Buy-In and Sell-Out Procedures).
\13\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The buy-in/sell-out process for stock loan positions has
significant benefits as it distributes the liquidity demands across
multiple counterparties, each of whom effectively act as independent
liquidating agents. The buy-in/sell-out process also aligns the
liquidity demands necessary to facilitate an unwind with the Clearing
Member receiving proceeds from the origination of the loan and
currently in possession of the collateral. However, the difference in
timing between an auction and the buy-in/sell-out process presents
credit and liquidity risks for OCC. Specifically, because OCC's
portfolio-based margin methodology combines stock loan positions with
options, futures, and margin collateral when determining margin
requirements, the difference in timing could expose OCC to increased
credit and liquidity risk should the price of the stock loan positions
move unfavorably between the time of auction and determination of the
final settlement price for remaining buy-in/sell-out transactions and
should that price differential exceed the amount of margin on deposit
for such positions.
Enhancement to Stock Loan Programs Close-Out Rules
In response to these concerns, OCC proposes to amend OCC Rules 2211
and 2211A to require buy-in or sell-out transactions to be complete by
the settlement time for a Clearing Member's obligations to OCC, defined
in Article I of the By-Laws,\14\ on the stock loan business day after
OCC gives non-defaulting Clearing Members the buy-in/sell-out
instruction. If a non-defaulting Clearing Member does not execute the
trades and provide notice by that time, OCC would terminate the Stock
Loan and effect settlement based upon the Marking Price at the close of
business the previous business day (i.e., the day that OCC provided the
instruction). This Marking Price (i.e., closing price) would be the
last settlement price captured in OCC's systems prior to the time by
which the non-defaulting Clearing Member was supposed to have taken
such actions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ By-Law Article I, Section 1.S.(16) defines ``settlement
time'' with respect of a Clearing Member's obligations to OCC to
mean 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This proposed enhancement is designed to mitigate the risks
associated with the difference in timing between close-out of stock
loan positions and an auction for the remainder of defaulting Clearing
Member's portfolio. In the typical case, an auction to close positions
for other products would occur on the morning prior to market opening
on the day after a default event occurs. Accelerating the deadline for
buy-in or sell-out transactions to that morning--rather than the end of
the stock loan business day--would reduce credit and liquidity risks by
aligning liquidation timing across products more closely.
The proposed enhancement also is designed to ensure that the close-
out process for the Stock Loan Programs would occur in a manner
consistent with OCC's two-day liquidation assumption (which is
applicable to all products without differentiation). At the earliest, a
defaulting Clearing Member would have made its last margin payment at
the settlement time on the business day prior to default. When that
Clearing Member fails to make its margin or mark-to-market payments the
next morning, OCC would suspend it and typically would issue the buy-
in/sell-out instruction to non-defaulting Clearing Members. The
proposed requirement that non-defaulting Clearing Members execute buy-
in and sell-out transactions by the settlement time on the business day
after default ensures that close-out occurs in a manner consistent with
the two-day liquidation assumption.
OCC considered requiring non-defaulting Clearing Members to execute
buy-in or sell-out transactions by the end of the business day on the
same day as OCC's instruction but believes extending the process to the
following morning is the better option. In discussion with several
Clearing Members, they expressed a preference
[[Page 49699]]
for setting the deadline at 9:00 a.m. Central Time the following
business day because doing so would allow a non-defaulting Clearing
Member the opportunity to trade at market opening. OCC believes
allowing non-defaulting Clearing Members to trade at market opening the
following morning would provide additional time to execute the buy-in
and sell-out method in a manner consistent with OCC's two-day
liquidation assumption.\15\ OCC also presented the proposed change at a
meeting of its Financial Risk Advisory Council (``FRAC''), a working
group comprised of exchanges, Clearing Members and other market
participants.\16\ No participant objected to OCC's proposal to
accelerate the close-out timing. While questions were raised about the
proposal to use the Marking Price at the close of business the day
prior in the event a Clearing Member fails to act by the settlement
time the next day, OCC believes using the last Marking Price available
in its system prior to the time by which a Clearing Member is obligated
to take action is superior because OCC's automated systems are designed
to determine the Marking Price based on closing securities prices. The
manual processes that OCC would need to institute to pull pricing
information other than closing prices would make the stock loan close-
out process more susceptible to delay and errors.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ OCC is considering a proposal to move its settlement time
from 9:00 a.m. settlement time earlier in the day, in which case the
deadline for a non-defaulting Clearing Member instructed to buy-in
or sell-out would change to the new settlement time.
\16\ OCC submitted the relevant portions of the presentation
provided at the April 16, 2019 FRAC meeting in confidential Exhibit
3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Implementation Timeframe
OCC expects to implement the proposed changes within thirty (30)
days after the date that OCC receives all necessary regulatory
approvals for the proposed changes. OCC will announce the
implementation date of the proposed change by an Information Memorandum
posted to its public website at least one (1) weeks prior to
implementation.
Anticipated Effect on and Management of Risk
OCC believes that the proposed changes would reduce the nature and
level of risk presented by OCC because they would enhance the overall
resilience of OCC's Stock Loan Programs by enhancing the default
management processes for the Stock Loan Programs to mitigate the risks
associated with the buy-in/sell-out described above.
OCC proposes to amend OCC Rules 2211 and 2211A to require buy-in or
sell-out transactions to be complete by the settlement time for a
Clearing Member's obligations to OCC, defined in Article I of the By-
Laws,\17\ on the stock loan business day after OCC gives non-defaulting
Clearing Members the buy-in/sell-out instruction. If a non-defaulting
Clearing Member does not execute the trades and provide notice by that
time, OCC would terminate the Stock Loan and effect settlement based
upon the Marking Price at the close of business the previous business
day (i.e., the day that OCC provided the instruction).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ By-Law Article I, Section 1.S.(16) defines ``settlement
time'' with respect of a Clearing Member's obligations to OCC to
mean 9:00 a.m. Central Time.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC believes the proposed changes help to mitigate the risks
associated with the difference in timing between close-out of stock
loan positions and an auction for the remainder of defaulting Clearing
Member's portfolio. In the typical case, an auction to close positions
for other products would occur on the morning prior to market opening
on the day after a default event occurs. Accelerating the deadline for
buy-in or sell-out transactions to that morning--rather than the end of
the stock loan business day--would reduce credit and liquidity risks by
aligning liquidation timing across products more closely. OCC also
believes the proposed changes helps to mitigate credit risks by
ensuring that the close-out process for the Stock Loan Programs would
occur in a manner consistent with OCC's two-day liquidation assumption
(which is applicable to all products without differentiation). In
addition, OCC believes using the last Marking Price available in its
system prior to the time by which a Clearing Member is obligated to
take action helps manage risk in situations where a Clearing Member
fails to take action because OCC's automated systems are designed to
determine the Marking Price based on closing securities prices. The
manual processes that OCC would need to institute to pull pricing
information other than closing prices would make the stock loan close-
out process more susceptible to delay and errors.
Consistency With the Clearing Supervision Act
The stated purpose of the Clearing Supervision Act is to mitigate
systemic risk in the financial system and promote financial stability
by, among other things, promoting uniform risk management standards for
systemically important financial market utilities and strengthening the
liquidity of systemically important financial market utilities.\18\
Section 805(a)(2) of the Clearing Supervision Act \19\ also authorizes
the Commission to prescribe risk management standards for the payment,
clearing and settlement activities of designated clearing entities,
like OCC, for which the Commission is the supervisory agency. Section
805(b) of the Clearing Supervision Act \20\ states that the objectives
and principles for risk management standards prescribed under Section
805(a) shall be to:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ 12 U.S.C. 5461(b).
\19\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
\20\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Promote robust risk management;
promote safety and soundness;
reduce systemic risks; and
support the stability of the broader financial system.
The Commission has adopted risk management standards under Section
805(a)(2) of the Clearing Supervision Act and the Exchange Act in
furtherance of these objectives and principles.\21\ Rule 17Ad-22
requires registered clearing agencies, like OCC, to establish,
implement, maintain, and enforce written policies and procedures that
are reasonably designed to meet certain minimum requirements for their
operations and risk management practices on an ongoing basis.\22\
Therefore, the Commission has stated \23\ that it believes it is
appropriate to review changes proposed in advance notices against Rule
17Ad-22 and the objectives and principles of these risk management
standards as described in Section 805(b) of the Clearing Supervision
Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22. See Exchange Act Release Nos. 68080
(October 22, 2012), 77 FR 66220 (November 2, 2012) (S7-08-11)
(``Clearing Agency Standards''); 78961 (September 28, 2016), 81 FR
70786 (October 13, 2016) (S7-03-14) (``Standards for Covered
Clearing Agencies'').
\22\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22.
\23\ See, e.g., Exchange Act Release No. 86182 (June 24, 2019),
84 FR 31128, 31129 (June 28, 2019) (SR-OCC-2019-803).
\24\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC believes the proposed changes are consistent with the
objectives and principles of Section 805(b) of the Clearing Supervision
Act.\25\ The proposed changes are generally designed to enhance OCC's
overall framework for managing member defaults by mitigating credit and
liquidity risks associated with the difference in timing between the
close-out of a defaulting Clearing Member's stock loan positions with
the auction of the remainder of its positions and
[[Page 49700]]
ensuring that the close-out occurs within OCC's two-day liquidation
time horizon. These proposed changes would help OCC avoid credit losses
or liquidity shortfalls that could disrupt OCC's operations. In this
way, OCC believes that the proposed enhancements to its overall
framework for managing liquidity risk would improve OCC's resilience as
a systemically important market utility by promoting robust risk
management; promoting safety and soundness; reducing systemic risks;
and supporting the stability of the broader financial system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OCC also believes that the proposed changes are consistent with the
risk management standards adopted by the Commission under Section
805(a)(2) of the Clearing Supervision Act; \26\ specifically, Rule
17Ad-22(e)(13) \27\ and Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23).\28\ Rule 17Ad-22(e)(13)
requires covered clearing agencies to establish, implement, maintain
and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed to, in
part, ensure the covered clearing agency has the authority and
operational capacity to take timely action to contain losses and
liquidity demands and continue to meet its obligations in the event of
a Clearing Member default.\29\ By more closely aligning the close-out
of stock loan positions with the close-out of other positions, these
proposed changes to OCC's default management processes would help
mitigate credit and liquidity risks should the price of the stock loan
positions move unfavorably between the time of auction and
determination of the final settlement price for remaining buy-in/sell-
out transactions and should that price differential exceed the amount
of margin on deposit for such positions. In addition, the proposed
changes would give OCC the authority and operational capacity to take
timely action to contain credit losses by authorizing OCC to cash
settle positions by the close of OCC's two-day liquidation time horizon
should a non-defaulting Clearing Member fail to report buy-in or sell-
out transactions as instructed. For these reasons, OCC believes the
proposed changes are reasonably designed to ensure that OCC's default
management processes contain losses and liquidity demands and continue
to meet settlement demands in the event of a Clearing Member default.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(a)(2).
\27\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(13).
\28\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23)
\29\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(13).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, Rule 17Ad-22(e)(23) requires covered clearing agencies
to maintain written policies and procedures reasonably designed to,
among other things, provide for publicly disclosing all relevant rules
and material procedures, including key aspects of its default rules and
procedures.\30\ The proposed changes would amend OCC's Rules, which are
available on OCC's websites, to provide for the new deadline for non-
defaulting Clearing Members to buy-in or sell-out if so instructed by
OCC in the event of a Clearing Member default, as well as how OCC would
close out a stock loan position if a non-defaulting Clearing Member
failed to do so. Therefore, OCC believes the proposed changes would
disclose default rules and procedures to the public and to Clearing
Members so that they can understand their obligations in the event of a
Clearing Member default.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the foregoing reasons, OCC believes that the proposed changes
are consistent with Section 805(b) of the Clearing Supervision Act \31\
and Rules 17Ad-22(e)(13) \32\ and (e)(23) \33\ under the Exchange Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ 12 U.S.C. 5464(b).
\32\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(7).
\33\ 17 CFR 240.17Ad-22(e)(23).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Advance Notice and Timing for
Commission Action
The proposed change may be implemented if the Commission does not
object to the proposed change within 60 days of the later of (i) the
date the proposed change was filed with the Commission or (ii) the date
any additional information requested by the Commission is received. OCC
shall not implement the proposed change if the Commission has any
objection to the proposed change.
The Commission may extend the period for review by an additional 60
days if the proposed change raises novel or complex issues, subject to
the Commission providing the clearing agency with prompt written notice
of the extension. A proposed change may be implemented in less than 60
days from the date the advance notice is filed, or the date further
information requested by the Commission is received, if the Commission
notifies the clearing agency in writing that it does not object to the
proposed change and authorizes the clearing agency to implement the
proposed change on an earlier date, subject to any conditions imposed
by the Commission.
OCC shall post notice on its website of proposed changes that are
implemented. The proposal shall not take effect until all regulatory
actions required with respect to the proposal are completed.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the advance
notice is consistent with the Clearing Supervision Act. Comments may be
submitted by any of the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-OCC-2020-805 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2020-805. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the advance notice that are filed with the
Commission, and all written communications relating to the advance
notice between the Commission and any person, other than those that may
be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5
U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the self-regulatory
organization.
All comments received will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish to make available publicly.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-OCC-2020-805 and
should be submitted on or before August 31, 2020.
[[Page 49701]]
By the Commission.
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17745 Filed 8-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P