Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof; Notice of Institution, 48263-48264 [2020-17360]

Download as PDF 48263 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 154 / Monday, August 10, 2020 / Notices BURDEN TABLE—Continued Citation 30 CFR 550 subpart C and related NTL(s) Subtotal ........................... Reporting and recordkeeping requirement Hour burden ................................................ ................................................ Average number of annual responses Annual burden hours 7 136 General 303–304 ................................. Departure and alternative compliance requests not specifically covered elsewhere in subpart C regulations. 24 ........................................... 5 requests 120 Subtotal ........................... ................................................ ................................................ 5 120 Total Burden ............ ................................................ ................................................ 807 An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The authority for this action is the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Deanna Meyer-Pietruszka, Chief, Office of Policy, Regulations, and Analysis. [FR Doc. 2020–17405 Filed 8–7–20; 8:45 am] INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1208] Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof; Notice of Institution U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 2, 2020, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Nokia Technologies Oy of Finland and Nokia Corporation of Finland. Supplements to the complaint were filed on July 17, 20, and 22, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices, including computers, tablet computers, and components and modules thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,144,764 (‘‘the ’764 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,532,808 (‘‘the ’808 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: 20:31 Aug 07, 2020 The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P VerDate Sep<11>2014 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,950,469 (‘‘the ’469 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,724,818 (‘‘the ’818 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,583,706 (‘‘the ’706 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease and desist orders. Jkt 250001 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 4, 2020, ordered that— SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: PO 00000 Frm 00115 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 35,200 (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 5–7, 9–13, 15, 16, 18, 21–23, 25–29, 31, 32, 35–37, 39–47, 49, 52–54, and 56– 62 of the ’764 patent; claims 1–4, 6, 7, 9–13, 15–18, 20–30, 32–41, 43–49, 51– 60, and 62–65 of the ’808 patent; claims 1–7, 9, 15, 16, 18, 20–25, 27–30, and 50 of the ’469 patent; claims 1–15 and 20– 23 of the ’818 patent; and claims 1–16 of the ’706 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘laptop computers, notebook computers, desktop computers, tablets, smart home devices, and servers.’’; (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), (f)(1), (g)(1); (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1 jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 48264 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 154 / Monday, August 10, 2020 / Notices are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: Nokia Technologies Oy, Karakaari 7A, FIN–02610, Espoo, Finland. Nokia Corporation, Karakaari 7A, FIN– 02610, Espoo, Finland. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Lenovo (United States), Inc., 8001 Development Drive, Morrisville, NC 27560. Lenovo Group Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Floor, Taikoo Place, 979 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong. Lenovo (Beijing) Limited, 6 Chuangye Rd., Shangdi Haidian District, 100085 Beijing, China. Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co. Ltd., No. 696 Songtao Road, 200000 Shanghai, China. Lenovo PC HK Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Floor, Taikoo Place, 979 King’s Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong. Lenovo Information Products Shenzhen Co. Ltd., No. 30 Tao Hua Road, Free Trade Zone, FuTian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 518038 Shenzhen, China. Lenovo Mobile Communication, No. 19, Gaoxin 4th Road, East Lake New Technology Development Zone, Hubei, 430079 Wuhan, China. Lenovo Corporation, No. 2088 Pangjin Road, Wujiang City, Jiangsu, 215217 Wujiang, China. Lenovo Centro Tecnologico S. de RL CV, Blvd. Escobedo No. 316, Parque Industrial Technology, 66600 Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, Mexico. (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 (March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not VerDate Sep<11>2014 20:31 Aug 07, 2020 Jkt 250001 be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: August 4, 2020. Lisa Barton, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2020–17360 Filed 8–7–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–1209] Certain Movable Barrier Operator Systems and Components Thereof; Notice of Institution U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on July 6, 2020, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Overhead Door Corporation of Lewisville, Texas and GMI Holdings Inc. of Mount Hope, Ohio. A supplement to the complaint was filed on July 22, 2020. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain movable barrier operator systems and components thereof by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,970,345 (‘‘the ’345 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 9,483,935 (’’the ’935 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,173,516 (‘‘the ’516 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,180,260 (‘‘the ’260 Patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,956,718 (‘‘the ’718 Patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 8,410,895 (‘‘the ’895 Patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The complainants request that the Commission institute an SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00116 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email EDIS3Help@usitc.gov. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Katherine Hiner, Office of Docket Services, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–1802. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020). SCOPE OF INVESTIGATION: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on August 4, 2020, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain products identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 16, and 17 of the ’345 patent; claims 1, 4, 16, and 19 of the ’935 patent; claims 10–12, 14–16, and 18 of the ’516 patent; claims 1–3, 7, and 8 of the ’260 patent; claims 18 and 24 of the ’718 patent; and claim 17 of the ’895 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language description of the accused products or category of accused products, which defines the scope of the investigation, is ‘‘garage door systems and components thereof, remote controls, wireless transmitters, and software for operating the garage door systems’’; E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM 10AUN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 154 (Monday, August 10, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 48263-48264]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17360]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-1208]


Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet 
Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof; Notice of Institution

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on July 2, 2020, under section 337 
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on behalf of Nokia Technologies 
Oy of Finland and Nokia Corporation of Finland. Supplements to the 
complaint were filed on July 17, 20, and 22, 2020. The complaint 
alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the 
United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United 
States after importation of certain electronic devices, including 
computers, tablet computers, and components and modules thereof by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,144,764 
(``the '764 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,532,808 (``the '808 patent''); 
U.S. Patent No. 6,950,469 (``the '469 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 
7,724,818 (``the '818 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,583,706 (``the 
'706 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the 
United States exists as required by the applicable Federal Statute. The 
complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation 
and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and cease 
and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket 
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. For help accessing EDIS, please email 
[email protected]. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that 
information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the 
Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility 
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the 
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Pathenia M. Proctor, The Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone (202) 205-2560.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The authority for institution of this 
investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 
amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in section 210.10 of the Commission's 
Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2020).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on August 4, 2020, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain products 
identified in paragraph (2) by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 1, 2, 5-7, 9-13, 15, 16, 18, 21-23, 25-29, 31, 32, 35-37, 39-47, 
49, 52-54, and 56-62 of the '764 patent; claims 1-4, 6, 7, 9-13, 15-18, 
20-30, 32-41, 43-49, 51-60, and 62-65 of the '808 patent; claims 1-7, 
9, 15, 16, 18, 20-25, 27-30, and 50 of the '469 patent; claims 1-15 and 
20-23 of the '818 patent; and claims 1-16 of the '706 patent; and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) Pursuant to section 210.10(b)(1) of the Commission's Rules of 
Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10(b)(1), the plain language 
description of the accused products or category of accused products, 
which defines the scope of the investigation, is ``laptop computers, 
notebook computers, desktop computers, tablets, smart home devices, and 
servers.'';
    (3) Pursuant to Commission Rule 210.50(b)(1), 19 CFR 210.50(b)(1), 
the presiding administrative law judge shall take evidence or other 
information and hear arguments from the parties or other interested 
persons with respect to the public interest in this investigation, as 
appropriate, and provide the Commission with findings of fact and a 
recommended determination on this issue, which shall be limited to the 
statutory public interest factors set forth in 19 U.S.C. 1337(d)(1), 
(f)(1), (g)(1);
    (4) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following

[[Page 48264]]

are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation 
shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

Nokia Technologies Oy, Karakaari 7A, FIN-02610, Espoo, Finland.
Nokia Corporation, Karakaari 7A, FIN-02610, Espoo, Finland.
    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Lenovo (United States), Inc., 8001 Development Drive, Morrisville, NC 
27560.
Lenovo Group Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Floor, Taikoo Place, 979 
King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong.
Lenovo (Beijing) Limited, 6 Chuangye Rd., Shangdi Haidian District, 
100085 Beijing, China.
Lenovo (Shanghai) Electronics Technology Co. Ltd., No. 696 Songtao 
Road, 200000 Shanghai, China.
Lenovo PC HK Limited, Lincoln House, 23rd Floor, Taikoo Place, 979 
King's Road, Quarry Bay, Hong Kong.
Lenovo Information Products Shenzhen Co. Ltd., No. 30 Tao Hua Road, 
Free Trade Zone, FuTian District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, 
518038 Shenzhen, China.
Lenovo Mobile Communication, No. 19, Gaoxin 4th Road, East Lake New 
Technology Development Zone, Hubei, 430079 Wuhan, China.
Lenovo Corporation, No. 2088 Pangjin Road, Wujiang City, Jiangsu, 
215217 Wujiang, China.
Lenovo Centro Tecnologico S. de RL CV, Blvd. Escobedo No. 316, Parque 
Industrial Technology, 66600 Apodaca, Nuevo Leon, Mexico.
    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (5) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), as amended in 85 FR 15798 
(March 19, 2020), such responses will be considered by the Commission 
if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the 
complainants of the complaint and the notice of investigation. 
Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the 
notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor 
is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: August 4, 2020.
Lisa Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2020-17360 Filed 8-7-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.