Final Priorities and Definitions-Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are Blind-Training and Technical Assistance, 47652-47656 [2020-17215]
Download as PDF
47652
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED–2020–OSERS–0009]
Final Priorities and Definitions—
Independent Living Services for Older
Individuals Who Are Blind—Training
and Technical Assistance
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Final priorities and definitions.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) announces priorities and
definitions under the Independent
Living Services for Older Individuals
Who Are Blind (OIB) program, Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number 84.177Z. The Department may
use one or more of these priorities and
definitions for competitions in fiscal
year (FY) 2020 and later years. We take
this action to focus Federal financial
assistance on an identified national
need. We intend the priorities and
definitions to improve the
administration, operation, and
performance of the OIB program.
DATES: These priorities and definitions
are effective September 8, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mary Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 5100, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202–5176.
Telephone: (202) 245–7586. Email:
mary.williams@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUMMARY:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
this program is to provide training and
technical assistance to designated State
agencies (DSAs)—the State agencies that
provide vocational rehabilitation
services to individuals who are blind—
that receive grant funding under the OIB
program and to other service providers
that receive OIB program funding from
DSAs to provide services to consumers.
The training and technical assistance
are designed to improve the operation
and performance of programs and
services for older individuals who are
blind resulting in their enhanced
independence and self-sufficiency.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 796j–1.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34
CFR part 367.
We published a notice of proposed
priorities and definitions (NPP) for this
competition in the Federal Register on
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
March 25, 2020 (85 FR 16920). The NPP
contained background information and
our reasons for proposing the particular
priorities and definitions.
We made changes to the definition of
‘‘intensive training and technical
assistance’’ and to Proposed Priority 1 to
recognize that in-person services and
conferences may need to be
supplemented or replaced by virtual
offerings during the COVID–19
pandemic. There are otherwise no
substantive differences between the NPP
and these final priorities and
definitions.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation in the NPP, eight parties
submitted comments on the proposed
priorities and definitions.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes, or
suggested changes the law does not
authorize us to make. In addition, we do
not address general comments that raise
concerns not directly related to the
proposed priorities and definitions.
Analysis of Comments and Changes:
An analysis of the comments related to
the proposed priorities and definitions
follows.
Proposed Priority 1—Independent
Living Services for Older Individuals
Who Are Blind (OIB) Training and
Technical Assistance
Comment: One commenter stated that
the proposed priority does not go far
enough to enhance the capacity of OIB
and similar programs to access
additional funding to address the unmet
need for OIB services. The commenter
further stated that, if the OIB Training
and Technical Assistance Center
(Center) merely suggests funding
streams and methods of collaboration
and does not actually undertake
educational and other initiatives that
enhance the capacity of OIB and similar
programs to access additional funds,
this technical assistance will be a
largely cosmetic undertaking.
Discussion: We do not fully agree
with the commenter’s characterization
of the activities contemplated for the
Center. Through implementation of
Priority 1, the Center can train OIB
grantees on how to identify State and
local resources and implement strategies
to acquire and effectively leverage the
use of those resources, where
appropriate, to meet the unmet service
needs of OIB consumers. To that end,
the Center will be responsible for
identifying State and local resources
available to the OIB program as well as
promising practices that facilitate the
acquisition, sharing, and leveraging of
those resources within a State. This will
require communication and
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
coordination, on an ongoing basis, with
other federally funded training and
technical assistance projects and State
OIB programs.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested
a more targeted assessment of the four
core areas reflected in this proposed
priority and suggested utilizing a survey
of the DSAs to identify training content
that would best benefit their staff.
Discussion: RSA has conducted
surveys of DSAs since FY 2015 to
identify their training and technical
assistance needs, pursuant to the
requirements of section 751A(b) of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended
by the Workforce Innovation and
Opportunity Act (WIOA) (29 U.S.C.
796j–1). Survey information is captured
through the OIB annual performance
reports. The four core areas reflected in
Priority 1 are based on survey
information gathered through the OIB
annual performance reports since FY
2015.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter
recommended changes to the proposed
priority in four areas: (1) Virtual and
remote services and assistance; (2) Best
practices; (3) Evaluating program
performance; and (4) Modifying
information technology (IT) platforms.
Regarding virtual and remote services
and assistance, the commenter
suggested offering flexibility to provide
training on remote or virtual service
delivery practices to help maintain and
expand service provision, particularly
in large or rural service areas. Further,
the commenter suggested the
Department provide flexibility to the
Center with respect to the form of
service delivery in unusual
circumstances that represent higher
risks to the older people who are served
by the OIB programs.
Regarding best practices, the
commenter noted that the term ‘‘best
practices’’ used in Priority 1, general
topic area (b), in the OIB program FY
2015 grant competition was changed to
‘‘promising practices’’ in Proposed
Priority 1. The commenter suggested, to
the extent that best practices exist,
technical assistance and training should
be based on best practices, and the final
priority should make this clarification.
Regarding evaluating program
performance, the commenter suggested
that training and technical assistance
should be provided on the evaluation of
programs, client progress, and
outcomes, and recommended changing
general topic area (b), to read
‘‘Promising practices, including the
development, dissemination, and
evaluation of relevant materials to
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
facilitate delivery of effective services’’
and changing general topic area (c) to
include evaluation and to read
‘‘Program performance, including data
reporting, evaluation, and analysis.’’
Regarding modifying IT platforms, the
commenter indicated that ample
platforms exist to support dissemination
of information on training and technical
assistance and suggested focusing on the
channels that already exist, to the
greatest extent possible, in order to
maximize limited resources available for
the Center and the OIB programs.
Discussion: In the area of virtual and
remote services and assistance, we
believe that development of training on
remote or virtual service delivery
practices can be accomplished under
Final Priority 1, activity (b)(2). We used
the term ‘‘promising practices’’ rather
than ‘‘best practices’’ because ‘‘best
practices’’ would rely on a higher level
of evidence than is currently available
in the area of serving older individuals
who are blind. The term ‘‘promising
practices’’ aligns with the definition of
‘‘promising evidence’’ in 34 CFR 77.1(c).
However, where there are relevant
evidence-based practices, we encourage
the Center to provide training and
technical assistance based on such
practices.
Regarding the suggestions to change
the language in general topic area (c), as
noted earlier, the four general topic
areas under Final Priority 1 are based on
the results of surveys of the DSAs to
determine their training and technical
assistance needs. Furthermore, we
believe that general topic area (c) is
sufficiently flexible to allow for the
provision of technical assistance on the
areas of evaluation of programs, client
progress, and outcomes if it is
determined that these issues need to be
addressed.
Regarding IT platforms, this priority
allows for the development of new IT
platforms or systems if existing
platforms and systems cannot be
effectively modified to support
webinars, podcasts, video conferences,
teleconferences, and other virtual
methods of dissemination of
information and training and technical
assistance.
Changes: None.
types of training and technical
assistance provided.
Discussion: We recognize that the
definition of ‘‘intensive training and
technical assistance’’ is broad; however,
this is intentional given the range of
issues that OIB agencies may encounter
in their implementation of the OIB
program. OIB grantees, in collaboration
with this Center, will determine the
type and level of intensive training and
technical assistance needed. We believe
that the definition offers applicants the
flexibility they need to demonstrate how
they would apply the definition of
‘‘intensive training and technical
assistance’’ to meet the varying needs of
the OIB grantees. The definition of
‘‘intensive training and technical
assistance’’ used in this priority is the
standard definition used for the
Rehabilitation Services Administration’s
(RSA’s) training and technical
assistance centers to provide this
flexibility.
Changes: None.
Comment: None.
Discussion: As a result of disruptions
to in-person services arising from the
COVID–19 pandemic, the Department
believes it is advisable to provide for the
possibility that intensive training and
technical assistance might sometimes be
provided through remote delivery, as
needed and appropriate.
Changes: We have revised the
definition of ‘‘intensive training and
technical assistance’’ to allow the Center
to provide intensive training and
technical assistance through remote
delivery as appropriate.
Definitions
Final Priorities
Comment: One commenter stated that
the definition of ‘‘intensive training and
technical assistance’’ lacks detail. The
commenter stated that the definition
could be improved and clarified by
presenting methods and examples that
represent the level of training received
in order to differentiate between the
Priority 1—Independent Living Services
for Older Individuals Who Are Blind
(OIB) Training and Technical
Assistance
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
General
Comment: A few commenters stated
that the proposed priorities could
benefit from clearer descriptive labeling
and language, use of shorter sentences
and smaller sections to facilitate ease of
reading and clarity, and hyperlinks to
improve understanding, but the
commenters did not offer specific
suggestions or examples to improve the
clarity of the proposed priorities.
Discussion: We appreciate the value
of using plain language in the priorities
and believe the current language is
clear.
Changes: None.
This priority supports a cooperative
agreement to establish an OIB Training
and Technical Assistance Center
(Center) to provide universal, targeted,
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47653
and intensive training and technical
assistance to designated State agencies
(DSAs) funded under the OIB program
and to any service providers that DSAs
fund to provide services directly to
consumers. The Center will develop and
provide training and technical
assistance in the following general topic
areas:
(a) Community outreach methods and
strategies to identify potential recipients
of services.
(b) Promising practices, based on
‘‘promising evidence’’ as defined in 34
CFR 77.1(c), including the development
and dissemination of relevant materials
to facilitate the delivery of high-quality
services.
(c) Program performance, including
data reporting and analysis.
(d) Financial and management
practices, including practices to ensure
compliance with grant administration
requirements.
To meet the requirements of this
priority, the Center must, at a minimum,
conduct the following activities:
(a) Annually provide intensive
training and technical assistance to a
minimum of three DSAs or other service
providers on the four general topic areas
in this priority. Intensive training and
technical assistance may be provided
through remote delivery as appropriate.
The technical assistance must be—
(1) Consistent with the project
activities and tailored to the specific
needs and challenges of the DSA or
other service provider receiving
intensive training and technical
assistance;
(2) Provided under an agreement with
each DSA or other service provider that,
at a minimum, details the purpose,
intended outcomes, and requirements
for subsequent evaluation of the training
and technical assistance; and
(3) Assessed 90 days after completion
to ensure that the DSAs and other
service providers receiving intensive
training and technical assistance are
applying it effectively, and to address
any issues or challenges in its
implementation.
(b) Provide a range of targeted training
and technical assistance and universal
training and technical assistance
products and services on the four
general topic areas in this priority. The
training and technical assistance must
include, at a minimum, the following
activities:
(1) In each year of the project, provide
a minimum of 10 webinars, podcasts,
video conferences, teleconferences, or
other virtual methods of dissemination
of information and training and
technical assistance on the four general
topic areas in this priority to describe
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
47654
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
and disseminate information about
emerging promising practices.
(2) Develop new information
technology (IT) platforms or systems, or
modify existing platforms and systems,
as follows:
(i) Develop or modify, and maintain,
a state-of-the-art IT platform sufficient
to support webinars, podcasts, video
conferences, teleconferences, and other
virtual methods of dissemination of
information and training and technical
assistance; and
(ii) Develop or modify, and maintain,
a state-of-the-art archiving and
dissemination system that is open and
available to the public, at no cost, and
that provides a central location for later
use of training and technical assistance
products, including course curricula,
audiovisual materials, webinars,
examples of emerging and promising
practices related to the four general
topic areas in this priority, and any
other training and technical assistance
products developed by the grantee and
others.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Note: All products produced by the Center
must meet government and industryrecognized standards for accessibility.
(c) Conduct outreach to DSAs so that
they are aware of, and can participate
in, training and technical assistance
activities.
(d) Establish a community of
practice 1 that will act as a vehicle for
communication, an exchange of
information among DSAs and other
service providers, and a forum for
sharing the results of training and
technical assistance activities that are in
progress or that have been completed.
(e) Facilitate annually a minimum of
one in-person conference, or, if health
and safety reasons make an in-person
conference infeasible, a virtual
conference, for the purpose of
dissemination of information related to
emerging promising practices and
ongoing technical assistance needs and
activities.
(f) Communicate and coordinate, on
an ongoing basis, with other federally
funded training and technical assistance
projects, particularly Departmentfunded projects, to ensure that training
and technical assistance activities are
complementary and non-duplicative.
(g) Conduct an evaluation to
determine the impact of the Center’s
training and technical assistance on the
DSAs and other service providers that
received the Center’s services.
1 See: www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/
dis104.html.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
Priority 2—Identify and Demonstrate
How Specific Technical Assistance
Strategies Provided to OIB Grantees
Will Facilitate Collaboration and
Leveraging of Resources at the State
and Local Level
To meet the requirements of this
priority, the Center must, at a minimum,
develop technical assistance focused on
partnerships to facilitate the sharing of
information and leveraging of resources
from other systems that work with aging
individuals and individuals with
disabilities.
These technical assistance strategies
must be designed to improve the
capacity of OIB grantee staff, and staff
from other service providers that receive
OIB program funding from DSAs to
provide services to the OIB population,
to acquire and develop the skills and
tools they need to help the OIB
population sustain and increase their
ability to live independently in their
homes and communities.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a
competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each
priority as absolute, competitive
preference, or invitational through a
notice in the Federal Register. The
effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute
priority, we consider only applications
that meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority:
Under a competitive preference priority,
we give competitive preference to an
application by (1) awarding additional
points, depending on the extent to
which the application meets the priority
(34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2) selecting
an application that meets the priority
over an application of comparable merit
that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an
invitational priority, we are particularly
interested in applications that meet the
priority. However, we do not give an
application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34
CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Definitions
The Department establishes the
following definitions for this program.
We may apply one or more of these
definitions in any year in which this
program is in effect.
Intensive training and technical
assistance means training and technical
assistance provided to a DSA, or other
service provider that receives OIB
program funding from a DSA to provide
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
services, primarily on-site or through
remote delivery, as needed and
appropriate, over an extended period.
Intensive training and technical
assistance is based on an ongoing
relationship between the training and
technical assistance center staff and a
DSA, or other service provider that
receives OIB program funding from a
DSA to provide services, under the
terms of a signed intensive training and
technical assistance agreement.
Targeted training and technical
assistance means training and technical
assistance based on needs common to
one or more DSAs, or other service
providers that receive OIB program
funding from DSAs to provide services,
on a time-limited basis and with a
limited commitment of training and
technical assistance center resources.
Targeted training and technical
assistance are delivered through virtual
or in-person methods tailored to the
identified needs of the participating
DSAs, or other service providers that
receive OIB program funding from DSAs
to provide services.
Universal training and technical
assistance means training and technical
assistance broadly available to DSAs, or
other service providers that receive OIB
program funding from DSAs to provide
services, and other interested parties
resulting in minimal interaction with
training and technical assistance center
staff. Universal training and technical
assistance includes generalized
presentations, products, and related
activities available through a website or
through brief contact with the training
and technical assistance center staff.
This document does not preclude us
from proposing additional priorities,
requirements, definitions, or selection
criteria, subject to meeting applicable
rulemaking requirements.
Note: This document does not solicit
applications. In any year in which we choose
to use one or more of these priorities and
definitions, we invite applications through a
notice in the Federal Register.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and
13771 Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must
be determined whether this regulatory
action is ‘‘significant’’ and, therefore,
subject to the requirements of the
Executive order and subject to review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order
12866 defines a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as an action likely to result in
a rule that may—
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect a sector of the economy,
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or Tribal governments or
communities in a material way (also
referred to as an ‘‘economically
significant’’ rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary
impacts of entitlement grants, user fees,
or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues
arising out of legal mandates, the
President’s priorities, or the principles
stated in the Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a
significant regulatory action subject to
review by OMB under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866.
Under Executive Order 13771, for
each new regulation that the
Department proposes for notice and
comment or otherwise promulgates that
is a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866, and that
imposes total costs greater than zero, it
must identify two deregulatory actions.
For FY 2020, any new incremental costs
associated with a new regulation must
be fully offset by the elimination of
existing costs through deregulatory
actions. Because the regulatory action is
not significant, the requirements of
Executive Order 13771 do not apply.
We have also reviewed this final
regulatory action under Executive Order
13563, which supplements and
explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing
regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent
permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency—
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only
upon a reasoned determination that
their benefits justify their costs
(recognizing that some benefits and
costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the
least burden on society, consistent with
obtaining regulatory objectives and
taking into account—among other things
and to the extent practicable—the costs
of cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative
regulatory approaches, select those
approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic,
environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive
impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify
performance objectives, rather than the
behavior or manner of compliance a
regulated entity must adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available
alternatives to direct regulation,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
including economic incentives—such as
user fees or marketable permits—to
encourage the desired behavior, or
provide information that enables the
public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires
an agency ‘‘to use the best available
techniques to quantify anticipated
present and future benefits and costs as
accurately as possible.’’ The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of
OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ‘‘identifying
changing future compliance costs that
might result from technological
innovation or anticipated behavioral
changes.’’
We are issuing the final priorities and
definitions only on a reasoned
determination that their benefits justify
their costs. In choosing among
alternative regulatory approaches, we
selected those approaches that
maximize net benefits. Based on the
analysis that follows, the Department
believes that this regulatory action is
consistent with the principles in
Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and Tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. The potential costs
are those resulting from statutory
requirements and those we have
determined as necessary for
administering the Department’s
programs and activities.
In addition, we have considered the
potential benefits of this regulatory
action and noted these benefits in the
NPP.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
Certification: The Secretary certifies that
this regulatory action would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The U.S. Small Business Administration
Size Standards define proprietary
institutions as small businesses if they
are independently owned and operated,
are not dominant in their field of
operation, and have total annual
revenue below $7,000,000. Nonprofit
institutions are defined as small entities
if they are independently owned and
operated and not dominant in their field
of operation. Public institutions are
defined as small organizations if they
are operated by a government
overseeing a population below 50,000.
The small entities that this regulatory
action would affect are State and public
or non-profit agencies and organizations
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
47655
and institutions of higher education
(IHEs) that have the capacity to provide
training and technical assistance in the
provision of independent living services
for older individuals who are blind and
have demonstrated through their
application a capacity to provide the
level of training and technical assistance
necessary to meet the priorities and
definitions. We believe that the costs
imposed on an applicant by the
priorities and definitions would be
limited to paperwork burden related to
preparing an application and that the
benefits of these priorities and
definitions would outweigh any costs
incurred by the applicant. There are
very few entities that could provide the
type of technical assistance the Center
aims to provide. For these reasons these
priorities and definitions would not
impose a burden on a significant
number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995:
The priorities and definitions contain
information collection requirements that
are approved by OMB under OMB
control number 1820–0018.
Intergovernmental Review: This
program is subject to Executive Order
12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR
part 79. One of the objectives of the
Executive order is to foster an
intergovernmental partnership and a
strengthened federalism. The Executive
order relies on processes developed by
State and local governments for
coordination and review of Federal
financial assistance.
This document provides early
notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPP we requested comments
on whether the proposed priorities and
definitions would require transmission
of information that any other agency or
authority of the United States gathers or
makes available.
Based on the response to the NPP and
on our review, we have determined that
these final priorities and definitions do
not require transmission of information
that any other agency or authority of the
United States gathers or makes
available.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
47656
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Rules and Regulations
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services
Administration, Delegated the Authority to
Perform the Functions and Duties of the
Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–17215 Filed 8–4–20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED–2020–OSERS–0014]
Final Priorities, Requirements, and
Selection Criteria—Technical
Assistance and Dissemination To
Improve Services and Results for
Children With Disabilities—The
Individuals With Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA) Paperwork Reduction
Planning and Implementation Program
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services (OSERS),
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final priorities, requirements,
and selection criteria.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) announces priorities,
requirements, and selection criteria for
the IDEA Paperwork Reduction
Planning and Implementation Program,
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
(CFDA) number 84.326F. The
Department may select as many as 15
States to receive support in planning for
and implementing waivers of statutory
requirements of, or regulatory
requirements relating to, IDEA Part B to
reduce excessive paperwork and
noninstructional time burdens that do
not assist in improving educational and
functional results for children with
disabilities. The Department may use
these priorities, requirements, and
selection criteria for competitions in
fiscal year (FY) 2020 and later years. We
take this action to focus attention on an
identified national need to reduce
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:05 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
paperwork burden associated with the
requirements of IDEA Part B while
preserving the rights of children with
disabilities and promoting academic
achievement.
DATES: These priorities, requirements,
and selection criteria are effective
September 8, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Egnor, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 5163, Potomac Center Plaza,
Washington, DC 20202–5076.
Telephone: (202) 245–7334. Email:
David.Egnor@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of
the Technical Assistance and
Dissemination to Improve Services and
Results for Children with Disabilities
Program is to promote academic
achievement and to improve results for
children with disabilities by providing
technical assistance (TA), supporting
model demonstration projects,
disseminating useful information, and
implementing activities that are
supported by scientifically-based
research.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 1408
and 1463.
We published a notice of proposed
priorities, requirements, and selection
criteria (NPP) for this program in the
Federal Register on May 29, 2020 (85
FR 32317). The NPP contained
background information and our reasons
for proposing these particular priorities,
requirements, and selection criteria.
There are minor substantive
differences between the NPP and this
notice. As discussed in the Analysis of
Comments and Changes section of this
document, these changes relate to
instances where we believed further
clarification regarding stakeholder
participation was appropriate.
Public Comment: In response to our
invitation to comment in the NPP, six
parties submitted comments on the
proposed priorities, requirements, and
selection criteria.
Generally, we do not address
technical and other minor changes. In
addition, we do not address comments
that raised concerns not directly related
to the proposed priorities, requirements,
and selection criteria.
Analysis of Comments and Changes:
An analysis of the comments and of any
changes in the priorities, requirements,
and selection criteria since publication
of the NPP follows.
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
The Department received comments
on several specific topics, including
whether the Department had
established—(1) an identified national
need to reduce the paperwork burden
associated with the requirements of
IDEA Part B while preserving the rights
of children with disabilities and
promoting academic achievement; (2)
the appropriateness of using funds for
the stated purposes; and (3)
recommendations to address perceived
limitations in proposed requirements
regarding stakeholder engagement, data
collection, and other matters. Each topic
is addressed below.
Whether there is an identified
national need to reduce the paperwork
burden associated with the
requirements of IDEA Part B.
Comment: Several commenters raised
questions regarding the needs for the
IDEA Paperwork Reduction Planning
and Implementation Program, noting
that no States had received awards as a
result of two similar prior competitions
in 2007 and 2019, which they argued
signified that special education
paperwork reduction was no longer a
significant issue in the field. The same
commenters also cited recent survey
results indicating that special education
teachers and administrators no longer
identified special education paperwork
burden as a major concern as it was
perceived prior to the 2004 amendments
to the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA). They also noted
that, since 2004, advancements in
various technologies, such as computerbased individualized education
programs (IEPs), have significantly
reduced the amount of time that
educators spend on completing special
education paperwork.
Two commenters expressed general
support for seeking ways to reduce
special education paperwork but
cautioned that certain administrative
requirements that may seem
unnecessary for educators or
administrators may be vital to protecting
the interests of children with
disabilities.
Another commenter noted that IDEA
paperwork and other administrative
burdens interfered with the ability of
related services providers, including
members of their professional
association, to provide high-quality
services to children with disabilities.
Discussion: We appreciate
commenters’ concerns about the extent
to which they anticipate the proposed
priorities would generate value for
States. We acknowledge that, across
States, the degree of administrative
burdens may vary. As such, we do not
anticipate every State will apply for
E:\FR\FM\06AUR1.SGM
06AUR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 152 (Thursday, August 6, 2020)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 47652-47656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17215]
[[Page 47652]]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
34 CFR Chapter III
[Docket ID ED-2020-OSERS-0009]
Final Priorities and Definitions--Independent Living Services for
Older Individuals Who Are Blind--Training and Technical Assistance
AGENCY: Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services,
Department of Education.
ACTION: Final priorities and definitions.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) announces priorities
and definitions under the Independent Living Services for Older
Individuals Who Are Blind (OIB) program, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.177Z. The Department may use one or more of
these priorities and definitions for competitions in fiscal year (FY)
2020 and later years. We take this action to focus Federal financial
assistance on an identified national need. We intend the priorities and
definitions to improve the administration, operation, and performance
of the OIB program.
DATES: These priorities and definitions are effective September 8,
2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mary Williams, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 5100, Potomac Center Plaza
(PCP), Washington, DC 20202-5176. Telephone: (202) 245-7586. Email:
[email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of Program: The purpose of this program is to provide
training and technical assistance to designated State agencies (DSAs)--
the State agencies that provide vocational rehabilitation services to
individuals who are blind--that receive grant funding under the OIB
program and to other service providers that receive OIB program funding
from DSAs to provide services to consumers. The training and technical
assistance are designed to improve the operation and performance of
programs and services for older individuals who are blind resulting in
their enhanced independence and self-sufficiency.
Program Authority: 29 U.S.C. 796j-1.
Applicable Program Regulations: 34 CFR part 367.
We published a notice of proposed priorities and definitions (NPP)
for this competition in the Federal Register on March 25, 2020 (85 FR
16920). The NPP contained background information and our reasons for
proposing the particular priorities and definitions.
We made changes to the definition of ``intensive training and
technical assistance'' and to Proposed Priority 1 to recognize that in-
person services and conferences may need to be supplemented or replaced
by virtual offerings during the COVID-19 pandemic. There are otherwise
no substantive differences between the NPP and these final priorities
and definitions.
Public Comment: In response to our invitation in the NPP, eight
parties submitted comments on the proposed priorities and definitions.
Generally, we do not address technical and other minor changes, or
suggested changes the law does not authorize us to make. In addition,
we do not address general comments that raise concerns not directly
related to the proposed priorities and definitions.
Analysis of Comments and Changes: An analysis of the comments
related to the proposed priorities and definitions follows.
Proposed Priority 1--Independent Living Services for Older Individuals
Who Are Blind (OIB) Training and Technical Assistance
Comment: One commenter stated that the proposed priority does not
go far enough to enhance the capacity of OIB and similar programs to
access additional funding to address the unmet need for OIB services.
The commenter further stated that, if the OIB Training and Technical
Assistance Center (Center) merely suggests funding streams and methods
of collaboration and does not actually undertake educational and other
initiatives that enhance the capacity of OIB and similar programs to
access additional funds, this technical assistance will be a largely
cosmetic undertaking.
Discussion: We do not fully agree with the commenter's
characterization of the activities contemplated for the Center. Through
implementation of Priority 1, the Center can train OIB grantees on how
to identify State and local resources and implement strategies to
acquire and effectively leverage the use of those resources, where
appropriate, to meet the unmet service needs of OIB consumers. To that
end, the Center will be responsible for identifying State and local
resources available to the OIB program as well as promising practices
that facilitate the acquisition, sharing, and leveraging of those
resources within a State. This will require communication and
coordination, on an ongoing basis, with other federally funded training
and technical assistance projects and State OIB programs.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter suggested a more targeted assessment of the
four core areas reflected in this proposed priority and suggested
utilizing a survey of the DSAs to identify training content that would
best benefit their staff.
Discussion: RSA has conducted surveys of DSAs since FY 2015 to
identify their training and technical assistance needs, pursuant to the
requirements of section 751A(b) of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as
amended by the Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) (29
U.S.C. 796j-1). Survey information is captured through the OIB annual
performance reports. The four core areas reflected in Priority 1 are
based on survey information gathered through the OIB annual performance
reports since FY 2015.
Changes: None.
Comment: One commenter recommended changes to the proposed priority
in four areas: (1) Virtual and remote services and assistance; (2) Best
practices; (3) Evaluating program performance; and (4) Modifying
information technology (IT) platforms.
Regarding virtual and remote services and assistance, the commenter
suggested offering flexibility to provide training on remote or virtual
service delivery practices to help maintain and expand service
provision, particularly in large or rural service areas. Further, the
commenter suggested the Department provide flexibility to the Center
with respect to the form of service delivery in unusual circumstances
that represent higher risks to the older people who are served by the
OIB programs.
Regarding best practices, the commenter noted that the term ``best
practices'' used in Priority 1, general topic area (b), in the OIB
program FY 2015 grant competition was changed to ``promising
practices'' in Proposed Priority 1. The commenter suggested, to the
extent that best practices exist, technical assistance and training
should be based on best practices, and the final priority should make
this clarification.
Regarding evaluating program performance, the commenter suggested
that training and technical assistance should be provided on the
evaluation of programs, client progress, and outcomes, and recommended
changing general topic area (b), to read ``Promising practices,
including the development, dissemination, and evaluation of relevant
materials to
[[Page 47653]]
facilitate delivery of effective services'' and changing general topic
area (c) to include evaluation and to read ``Program performance,
including data reporting, evaluation, and analysis.''
Regarding modifying IT platforms, the commenter indicated that
ample platforms exist to support dissemination of information on
training and technical assistance and suggested focusing on the
channels that already exist, to the greatest extent possible, in order
to maximize limited resources available for the Center and the OIB
programs.
Discussion: In the area of virtual and remote services and
assistance, we believe that development of training on remote or
virtual service delivery practices can be accomplished under Final
Priority 1, activity (b)(2). We used the term ``promising practices''
rather than ``best practices'' because ``best practices'' would rely on
a higher level of evidence than is currently available in the area of
serving older individuals who are blind. The term ``promising
practices'' aligns with the definition of ``promising evidence'' in 34
CFR 77.1(c). However, where there are relevant evidence-based
practices, we encourage the Center to provide training and technical
assistance based on such practices.
Regarding the suggestions to change the language in general topic
area (c), as noted earlier, the four general topic areas under Final
Priority 1 are based on the results of surveys of the DSAs to determine
their training and technical assistance needs. Furthermore, we believe
that general topic area (c) is sufficiently flexible to allow for the
provision of technical assistance on the areas of evaluation of
programs, client progress, and outcomes if it is determined that these
issues need to be addressed.
Regarding IT platforms, this priority allows for the development of
new IT platforms or systems if existing platforms and systems cannot be
effectively modified to support webinars, podcasts, video conferences,
teleconferences, and other virtual methods of dissemination of
information and training and technical assistance.
Changes: None.
Definitions
Comment: One commenter stated that the definition of ``intensive
training and technical assistance'' lacks detail. The commenter stated
that the definition could be improved and clarified by presenting
methods and examples that represent the level of training received in
order to differentiate between the types of training and technical
assistance provided.
Discussion: We recognize that the definition of ``intensive
training and technical assistance'' is broad; however, this is
intentional given the range of issues that OIB agencies may encounter
in their implementation of the OIB program. OIB grantees, in
collaboration with this Center, will determine the type and level of
intensive training and technical assistance needed. We believe that the
definition offers applicants the flexibility they need to demonstrate
how they would apply the definition of ``intensive training and
technical assistance'' to meet the varying needs of the OIB grantees.
The definition of ``intensive training and technical assistance'' used
in this priority is the standard definition used for the Rehabilitation
Services Administration's (RSA's) training and technical assistance
centers to provide this flexibility.
Changes: None.
Comment: None.
Discussion: As a result of disruptions to in-person services
arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, the Department believes it is
advisable to provide for the possibility that intensive training and
technical assistance might sometimes be provided through remote
delivery, as needed and appropriate.
Changes: We have revised the definition of ``intensive training and
technical assistance'' to allow the Center to provide intensive
training and technical assistance through remote delivery as
appropriate.
General
Comment: A few commenters stated that the proposed priorities could
benefit from clearer descriptive labeling and language, use of shorter
sentences and smaller sections to facilitate ease of reading and
clarity, and hyperlinks to improve understanding, but the commenters
did not offer specific suggestions or examples to improve the clarity
of the proposed priorities.
Discussion: We appreciate the value of using plain language in the
priorities and believe the current language is clear.
Changes: None.
Final Priorities
Priority 1--Independent Living Services for Older Individuals Who Are
Blind (OIB) Training and Technical Assistance
This priority supports a cooperative agreement to establish an OIB
Training and Technical Assistance Center (Center) to provide universal,
targeted, and intensive training and technical assistance to designated
State agencies (DSAs) funded under the OIB program and to any service
providers that DSAs fund to provide services directly to consumers. The
Center will develop and provide training and technical assistance in
the following general topic areas:
(a) Community outreach methods and strategies to identify potential
recipients of services.
(b) Promising practices, based on ``promising evidence'' as defined
in 34 CFR 77.1(c), including the development and dissemination of
relevant materials to facilitate the delivery of high-quality services.
(c) Program performance, including data reporting and analysis.
(d) Financial and management practices, including practices to
ensure compliance with grant administration requirements.
To meet the requirements of this priority, the Center must, at a
minimum, conduct the following activities:
(a) Annually provide intensive training and technical assistance to
a minimum of three DSAs or other service providers on the four general
topic areas in this priority. Intensive training and technical
assistance may be provided through remote delivery as appropriate. The
technical assistance must be--
(1) Consistent with the project activities and tailored to the
specific needs and challenges of the DSA or other service provider
receiving intensive training and technical assistance;
(2) Provided under an agreement with each DSA or other service
provider that, at a minimum, details the purpose, intended outcomes,
and requirements for subsequent evaluation of the training and
technical assistance; and
(3) Assessed 90 days after completion to ensure that the DSAs and
other service providers receiving intensive training and technical
assistance are applying it effectively, and to address any issues or
challenges in its implementation.
(b) Provide a range of targeted training and technical assistance
and universal training and technical assistance products and services
on the four general topic areas in this priority. The training and
technical assistance must include, at a minimum, the following
activities:
(1) In each year of the project, provide a minimum of 10 webinars,
podcasts, video conferences, teleconferences, or other virtual methods
of dissemination of information and training and technical assistance
on the four general topic areas in this priority to describe
[[Page 47654]]
and disseminate information about emerging promising practices.
(2) Develop new information technology (IT) platforms or systems,
or modify existing platforms and systems, as follows:
(i) Develop or modify, and maintain, a state-of-the-art IT platform
sufficient to support webinars, podcasts, video conferences,
teleconferences, and other virtual methods of dissemination of
information and training and technical assistance; and
(ii) Develop or modify, and maintain, a state-of-the-art archiving
and dissemination system that is open and available to the public, at
no cost, and that provides a central location for later use of training
and technical assistance products, including course curricula,
audiovisual materials, webinars, examples of emerging and promising
practices related to the four general topic areas in this priority, and
any other training and technical assistance products developed by the
grantee and others.
Note: All products produced by the Center must meet government
and industry-recognized standards for accessibility.
(c) Conduct outreach to DSAs so that they are aware of, and can
participate in, training and technical assistance activities.
(d) Establish a community of practice \1\ that will act as a
vehicle for communication, an exchange of information among DSAs and
other service providers, and a forum for sharing the results of
training and technical assistance activities that are in progress or
that have been completed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See: www.sedl.org/pubs/catalog/items/dis104.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
(e) Facilitate annually a minimum of one in-person conference, or,
if health and safety reasons make an in-person conference infeasible, a
virtual conference, for the purpose of dissemination of information
related to emerging promising practices and ongoing technical
assistance needs and activities.
(f) Communicate and coordinate, on an ongoing basis, with other
federally funded training and technical assistance projects,
particularly Department-funded projects, to ensure that training and
technical assistance activities are complementary and non-duplicative.
(g) Conduct an evaluation to determine the impact of the Center's
training and technical assistance on the DSAs and other service
providers that received the Center's services.
Priority 2--Identify and Demonstrate How Specific Technical Assistance
Strategies Provided to OIB Grantees Will Facilitate Collaboration and
Leveraging of Resources at the State and Local Level
To meet the requirements of this priority, the Center must, at a
minimum, develop technical assistance focused on partnerships to
facilitate the sharing of information and leveraging of resources from
other systems that work with aging individuals and individuals with
disabilities.
These technical assistance strategies must be designed to improve
the capacity of OIB grantee staff, and staff from other service
providers that receive OIB program funding from DSAs to provide
services to the OIB population, to acquire and develop the skills and
tools they need to help the OIB population sustain and increase their
ability to live independently in their homes and communities.
Types of Priorities
When inviting applications for a competition using one or more
priorities, we designate the type of each priority as absolute,
competitive preference, or invitational through a notice in the Federal
Register. The effect of each type of priority follows:
Absolute priority: Under an absolute priority, we consider only
applications that meet the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(3)).
Competitive preference priority: Under a competitive preference
priority, we give competitive preference to an application by (1)
awarding additional points, depending on the extent to which the
application meets the priority (34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i)); or (2)
selecting an application that meets the priority over an application of
comparable merit that does not meet the priority (34 CFR
75.105(c)(2)(ii)).
Invitational priority: Under an invitational priority, we are
particularly interested in applications that meet the priority.
However, we do not give an application that meets the priority a
preference over other applications (34 CFR 75.105(c)(1)).
Final Definitions
The Department establishes the following definitions for this
program. We may apply one or more of these definitions in any year in
which this program is in effect.
Intensive training and technical assistance means training and
technical assistance provided to a DSA, or other service provider that
receives OIB program funding from a DSA to provide services, primarily
on-site or through remote delivery, as needed and appropriate, over an
extended period. Intensive training and technical assistance is based
on an ongoing relationship between the training and technical
assistance center staff and a DSA, or other service provider that
receives OIB program funding from a DSA to provide services, under the
terms of a signed intensive training and technical assistance
agreement.
Targeted training and technical assistance means training and
technical assistance based on needs common to one or more DSAs, or
other service providers that receive OIB program funding from DSAs to
provide services, on a time-limited basis and with a limited commitment
of training and technical assistance center resources. Targeted
training and technical assistance are delivered through virtual or in-
person methods tailored to the identified needs of the participating
DSAs, or other service providers that receive OIB program funding from
DSAs to provide services.
Universal training and technical assistance means training and
technical assistance broadly available to DSAs, or other service
providers that receive OIB program funding from DSAs to provide
services, and other interested parties resulting in minimal interaction
with training and technical assistance center staff. Universal training
and technical assistance includes generalized presentations, products,
and related activities available through a website or through brief
contact with the training and technical assistance center staff.
This document does not preclude us from proposing additional
priorities, requirements, definitions, or selection criteria, subject
to meeting applicable rulemaking requirements.
Note: This document does not solicit applications. In any year
in which we choose to use one or more of these priorities and
definitions, we invite applications through a notice in the Federal
Register.
Executive Orders 12866, 13563, and 13771 Regulatory Impact Analysis
Under Executive Order 12866, it must be determined whether this
regulatory action is ``significant'' and, therefore, subject to the
requirements of the Executive order and subject to review by the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB). Section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866
defines a ``significant regulatory action'' as an action likely to
result in a rule that may--
(1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more,
or adversely affect a sector of the economy,
[[Page 47655]]
productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or
safety, or State, local, or Tribal governments or communities in a
material way (also referred to as an ``economically significant''
rule);
(2) Create serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency;
(3) Materially alter the budgetary impacts of entitlement grants,
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients
thereof; or
(4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles stated in the
Executive order.
This final regulatory action is not a significant regulatory action
subject to review by OMB under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866.
Under Executive Order 13771, for each new regulation that the
Department proposes for notice and comment or otherwise promulgates
that is a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866,
and that imposes total costs greater than zero, it must identify two
deregulatory actions. For FY 2020, any new incremental costs associated
with a new regulation must be fully offset by the elimination of
existing costs through deregulatory actions. Because the regulatory
action is not significant, the requirements of Executive Order 13771 do
not apply.
We have also reviewed this final regulatory action under Executive
Order 13563, which supplements and explicitly reaffirms the principles,
structures, and definitions governing regulatory review established in
Executive Order 12866. To the extent permitted by law, Executive Order
13563 requires that an agency--
(1) Propose or adopt regulations only upon a reasoned determination
that their benefits justify their costs (recognizing that some benefits
and costs are difficult to quantify);
(2) Tailor its regulations to impose the least burden on society,
consistent with obtaining regulatory objectives and taking into
account--among other things and to the extent practicable--the costs of
cumulative regulations;
(3) In choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, select
those approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other
advantages; distributive impacts; and equity);
(4) To the extent feasible, specify performance objectives, rather
than the behavior or manner of compliance a regulated entity must
adopt; and
(5) Identify and assess available alternatives to direct
regulation, including economic incentives--such as user fees or
marketable permits--to encourage the desired behavior, or provide
information that enables the public to make choices.
Executive Order 13563 also requires an agency ``to use the best
available techniques to quantify anticipated present and future
benefits and costs as accurately as possible.'' The Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs of OMB has emphasized that these
techniques may include ``identifying changing future compliance costs
that might result from technological innovation or anticipated
behavioral changes.''
We are issuing the final priorities and definitions only on a
reasoned determination that their benefits justify their costs. In
choosing among alternative regulatory approaches, we selected those
approaches that maximize net benefits. Based on the analysis that
follows, the Department believes that this regulatory action is
consistent with the principles in Executive Order 13563.
We also have determined that this regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and Tribal governments in the exercise of
their governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive orders, the Department has
assessed the potential costs and benefits, both quantitative and
qualitative, of this regulatory action. The potential costs are those
resulting from statutory requirements and those we have determined as
necessary for administering the Department's programs and activities.
In addition, we have considered the potential benefits of this
regulatory action and noted these benefits in the NPP.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification: The Secretary certifies
that this regulatory action would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The U.S. Small
Business Administration Size Standards define proprietary institutions
as small businesses if they are independently owned and operated, are
not dominant in their field of operation, and have total annual revenue
below $7,000,000. Nonprofit institutions are defined as small entities
if they are independently owned and operated and not dominant in their
field of operation. Public institutions are defined as small
organizations if they are operated by a government overseeing a
population below 50,000.
The small entities that this regulatory action would affect are
State and public or non-profit agencies and organizations and
institutions of higher education (IHEs) that have the capacity to
provide training and technical assistance in the provision of
independent living services for older individuals who are blind and
have demonstrated through their application a capacity to provide the
level of training and technical assistance necessary to meet the
priorities and definitions. We believe that the costs imposed on an
applicant by the priorities and definitions would be limited to
paperwork burden related to preparing an application and that the
benefits of these priorities and definitions would outweigh any costs
incurred by the applicant. There are very few entities that could
provide the type of technical assistance the Center aims to provide.
For these reasons these priorities and definitions would not impose a
burden on a significant number of small entities.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995: The priorities and definitions
contain information collection requirements that are approved by OMB
under OMB control number 1820-0018.
Intergovernmental Review: This program is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of the
objectives of the Executive order is to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and local governments for coordination
and review of Federal financial assistance.
This document provides early notification of our specific plans and
actions for this program.
Assessment of Educational Impact
In the NPP we requested comments on whether the proposed priorities
and definitions would require transmission of information that any
other agency or authority of the United States gathers or makes
available.
Based on the response to the NPP and on our review, we have
determined that these final priorities and definitions do not require
transmission of information that any other agency or authority of the
United States gathers or makes available.
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document in an accessible format (e.g., braille, large print,
audiotape, or compact disc) on request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the
[[Page 47656]]
Code of Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services Administration, Delegated the
Authority to Perform the Functions and Duties of the Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative
Services.
[FR Doc. 2020-17215 Filed 8-4-20; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P