Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend the FINRA Rule 6800 Series (Consolidated Audit Trail Compliance Rule), 47824-47827 [2020-17134]
Download as PDF
47824
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Portfolio and/or the Proxy Portfolio or
changes thereto;
• In the event (a) the Adviser or SubAdviser becomes registered as a brokerdealer or becomes newly affiliated with
a broker-dealer, or (b) any new adviser
or sub-adviser is a registered brokerdealer, or becomes affiliated with a
broker-dealer, it will implement and
maintain a fire wall with respect to its
relevant personnel or its broker-dealer
affiliate regarding access to information
concerning the composition of and/or
changes to a Fund’s Actual Portfolio
and/or Proxy Portfolio, and will be
subject to procedures designed to
prevent the use and dissemination of
material non-public information
regarding a Fund’s Actual Portfolio and/
or Proxy Portfolio or changes thereto;
and
• Any person or entity, including any
service provider for a Fund, who has
access to non-public information
regarding a Fund’s Actual Portfolio or
the Proxy Portfolio or changes thereto
will be subject to procedures reasonably
designed to prevent the use and
dissemination of material non-public
information regarding a Fund’s Actual
Portfolio and/or the Proxy Portfolio or
changes thereto, and if any such person
or entity is registered as a broker-dealer
or affiliated with a broker-dealer, such
person or entity has erected and will
maintain a ‘‘fire wall’’ between the
person or entity and the broker-dealer
with respect to access to information
concerning the composition of and/or
changes to a Fund’s Actual Portfolio
and/or Proxy Portfolio.
Finally, trading in the Shares will be
subject to the existing trading
surveillances, administered by the
Exchange, as well as cross-market
surveillances administered by the
Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(‘‘FINRA’’) on behalf of the Exchange,19
and the Exchange states that these
surveillance procedures are adequate to
properly monitor Exchange trading of
the Shares in all trading sessions and to
deter and detect violations of Exchange
rules and federal securities laws
applicable to trading on the Exchange.
The Exchange deems the Shares to be
equity securities, thus rendering trading
in the Shares subject to the Exchange’s
existing rules governing the trading of
equity securities.
19 See NYSE Arca Rule 8.601–E, Commentary .03,
which requires, as part of the surveillance
procedures for Active Proxy Portfolio Shares, a
Fund’s investment adviser to, upon request by the
Exchange or FINRA, on behalf of the Exchange,
make available to the Exchange or FINRA the daily
Actual Portfolio holdings of the Fund.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
The Commission finds that the
following support the listing and trading
of the Shares:
(1) The Shares will conform to the
initial and continued listing criteria
under NYSE Arca Rule 8.601–E.
(2) A minimum of 100,000 Shares for
each Fund will be outstanding at the
commencement of trading on the
Exchange.
(3) The Exchange or FINRA, on behalf
of the Exchange, or both, will
communicate as needed, and may
obtain information, regarding trading in
the Shares and underlying exchangetraded instruments with other markets
and other entities that are members of
the ISG. In addition, the Exchange may
obtain information regarding trading in
the Shares and underlying exchangetraded instruments from markets and
other entities with which the Exchange
has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement. Any
foreign common stocks held by a Fund
will be traded on an exchange that is a
member of the ISG or with which the
Exchange has in place a comprehensive
surveillance sharing agreement.
(4) The Exchange has appropriate
rules to facilitate trading in the Shares
during all trading sessions.
(5) For initial and continued listing,
the Funds will be in compliance with
Rule 10A–3 under the Act.20
(6) Each Fund’s holdings will conform
to the permissible investments as set
forth in the Application and Exemptive
Order and the holdings will be
consistent with all requirements set
forth in the Application and Exemptive
Order. Each Fund’s investments,
including derivatives, will be consistent
with its investment objective and will
not be used to enhance leverage
(although certain derivatives and other
investments may result in leverage).
(7) With respect to Active Proxy
Portfolio Shares, all of the Exchange
member obligations relating to product
description and prospectus delivery
requirements will continue to apply in
accordance with Exchange rules and
federal securities laws, and the
Exchange and FINRA will continue to
monitor Exchange members for
compliance with such requirements.
Pursuant to Commentary .01 to NYSE
Arca Rule 8.601–E, all statements and
representations made in the filing
regarding: (1) The description of the
portfolio; (2) limitations on portfolio
holdings; or (3) the applicability of
Exchange listing rules specified in the
filing constitute continued listing
requirements for listing the Shares on
the Exchange. In addition, the issuer
20 See
PO 00000
17 CFR 240.10A–3.
Frm 00096
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
must notify the Exchange of any failure
by a Fund to comply with the continued
listing requirements and, pursuant to its
obligations under Section 19(g)(1) of the
Act, the Exchange will monitor 21 for
compliance with the continued listing
requirements. If a Fund is not in
compliance with the applicable listing
requirements, the Exchange will
commence delisting procedures under
NYSE Arca Rule 5.5–E(m).
IV. Conclusion
It is therefore ordered, pursuant to
Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 22 that the
proposed rule change (SR–NYSEArca–
2020–51), as modified by Amendment
No. 2, be, and it hereby is, approved.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–17131 Filed 8–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89441; File No. SR–FINRA–
2020–023]
Self-Regulatory Organizations;
Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend the FINRA
Rule 6800 Series (Consolidated Audit
Trail Compliance Rule)
July 31, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on July 30,
2020, Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘SEC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed
rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been
prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
21 The Commission notes that certain proposals
for the listing and trading of exchange-traded
products include a representation that the exchange
will ‘‘surveil’’ for compliance with the continued
listing requirements. See, e.g., Securities Exchange
Act Release No. 77499 (April 1, 2016), 81 FR 20428,
20432 (April 7, 2016) (SR–BATS–2016–04). In the
context of this representation, it is the
Commission’s view that ‘‘monitor’’ and ‘‘surveil’’
both mean ongoing oversight of compliance with
the continued listing requirements. Therefore, the
Commission does not view ‘‘monitor’’ as a more or
less stringent obligation than ‘‘surveil’’ with respect
to the continued listing requirements.
22 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
23 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend the
FINRA Rule 6800 Series, FINRA’s
compliance rule (‘‘Compliance Rule’’)
regarding the National Market System
Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit
Trail (the ‘‘CAT NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’) 3
to be consistent with an amendment to
the CAT NMS Plan recently approved
by the Commission.
The text of the proposed rule change
is available on FINRA’s website at
https://www.finra.org, at the principal
office of FINRA and at the
Commission’s Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission,
FINRA included statements concerning
the purpose of and basis for the
proposed rule change and discussed any
comments it received on the proposed
rule change. The text of these statements
may be examined at the places specified
in Item IV below. FINRA has prepared
summaries, set forth in sections A, B,
and C below, of the most significant
aspects of such statements.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule
change is to amend the Rule 6800
Series, the Compliance Rule regarding
the CAT NMS Plan, to be consistent
with an amendment to the CAT NMS
Plan recently approved by the
Commission.4 The Commission
approved an amendment to the CAT
NMS Plan to amend the requirements
for Firm Designated IDs in four ways: (1)
To prohibit the use of account numbers
as Firm Designated IDs for trading
accounts that are not proprietary
accounts; (2) to require that the Firm
Designated ID for a trading account be
persistent over time for each Industry
Member so that a single account may be
tracked across time within a single
Industry Member; (3) to permit the use
of relationship identifiers as Firm
Designated IDs in certain circumstances;
3 Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms
used in this rule filing are defined as set forth in
the Compliance Rule.
4 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89397
(July 24, 2020), 85 FR 45941 (July 30, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
and (4) to permit the use of entity
identifiers as Firm Designated IDs in
certain circumstances (the ‘‘FDID
Amendment’’). As a result, FINRA
proposes to amend the definition of
‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in Rule 6810 to
reflect the changes to the CAT NMS
Plan regarding the requirements for
Firm Designated IDs.
Rule 6810(r) defines the term ‘‘Firm
Designated ID’’ to mean ‘‘a unique
identifier for each trading account
designated by Industry Members for
purposes of providing data to the
Central Repository, where each such
identifier is unique among all identifiers
from any given Industry Member for
each business date.’’
(1) Prohibit Use of Account Numbers
FINRA proposes to amend the
definition of ‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in
Rule 6810(r) to provide that Industry
Members may not use account numbers
as the Firm Designated ID for trading
accounts that are not proprietary
accounts. Specifically, FINRA proposes
to add the following to the definition of
a Firm Designated ID: ‘‘provided,
however, such identifier may not be the
account number for such trading
account if the trading account is not a
proprietary account.’’
(2) Persistent Firm Designated ID
FINRA also proposes to amend the
definition of ‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in
Rule 6810(r) to require a Firm
Designated ID assigned by an Industry
Member to a trading account to be
persistent over time, not for each
business day.5 To effect this change,
FINRA proposes to amend the definition
of ‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in Rule 6810(r)
to add ‘‘and persistent’’ after ‘‘unique’’
and delete ‘‘for each business date’’ so
that the definition of ‘‘Firm Designated
ID’’ would read, in relevant part, as
follows:
A unique and persistent identifier for each
trading account designated by Industry
Members for purposes of providing data to
the Central Repository . . . where each such
identifier is unique among all identifiers
from any given Industry Member.
5 If an Industry Member assigns a new account
number or entity identifier to a client or customer
due to a merger, acquisition or some other corporate
action, then the Industry Member should create a
new Firm Designated ID to identify the new account
identifier/relationship identifier/entity identifier in
use at the Industry Member for the entity. In
addition, if a previously assigned Firm Designated
ID is no longer in use by an Industry Member (e.g.,
if the trading account associated with the Firm
Designated ID has been closed), then an Industry
Member may reuse the Firm Designated ID for
another trading account. The Plan Processor will
maintain a history of the use of each Firm
Designated ID, including, for example, the effective
dates of the Firm Designated ID with respect to each
associated trading account.
PO 00000
Frm 00097
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47825
(3) Relationship Identifiers
The FDID Amendment also permits
an Industry Member to provide a
relationship identifier as the Firm
Designated ID, rather than an identifier
that represents a trading account, in
certain scenarios in which an Industry
Member does not have an account
number available to its order handling
and/or execution system at the time of
order receipt (e.g., certain institutional
accounts, managed accounts, accounts
for individuals). In such scenarios, the
trading account structure may not be
available when a new order is first
received from a client and, instead, only
an identifier representing the client’s
trading relationship is available. In
these limited instances, the Industry
Member may provide an identifier used
by the Industry Member to represent the
client’s trading relationship with the
Industry Member instead of an account
number.
When a trading relationship is
established at a broker-dealer for clients,
the broker-dealer typically creates a
parent account, under which additional
subaccounts are created. However, in
some cases, the broker-dealer
establishes the parent relationship for a
client using a relationship identifier as
opposed to an actual parent account.
The relationship identifier could be any
of a variety of identifiers, such as a short
name for a relevant individual or
institution. This relationship identifier
is established prior to any trading for
the client. If a relationship identifier has
been established rather than a parent
account, and an order is placed on
behalf of the client, any executed trades
will be kept in a firm account (e.g., a
facilitation or average price account)
until they are allocated to the proper
subaccount(s), i.e., the accounts
associated with the parent relationship
identifier connecting them to the client.
Relationship identifiers are used in
circumstances in which the account
structure is not available to the trading
system at the time of order placement.
The clients have established accounts
prior to the trade that satisfy relevant
regulatory obligations for opening
accounts, such as Know Your Customer
and other customer obligations.
However, the order receipt workflows
operate using relationship identifiers,
not accounts.
For Firm Designated ID purposes, as
with an identifier for a trading account,
the relationship identifier must be
persistent over time. The relationship
identifier also must be unique among all
identifiers from any given Industry
Member. With these requirements, a
single relationship could be tracked
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
47826
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
across time within a single Industry
Member using the Firm Designated ID.
In addition, the relationship identifier
must be masked as the relationship
identifier could be a name or otherwise
provide an indication as to the identity
of the relationship. The masking
requirement would avoid potentially
revealing the identity of the
relationship.
An example of the use of a
relationship identifier as a Firm
Designated ID would be as follows:
Suppose that Big Fund Manager is
known in Industry Member A’s systems
as ‘‘BFM1.’’ When an order is placed by
Big Fund Manager, the order is tagged
to BFM1. Industry Member A could use
a masked version of BFM1 in place of
the Firm Designated ID representing a
trading account when reporting a new
order from Big Fund Manager instead of
the account numbers to which executed
shares/contracts will be allocated at a
later time via a booking or other system.
Similarly, another example of the use of
a relationship identifier as a Firm
Designated ID would involve an
individual in place of the Big Fund
Manager in the above example.
In accordance with the FDID
Amendment, FINRA proposes to amend
the definition of a ‘‘Firm Designated ID’’
in Rule 6810(r) to permit Industry
Members to provide a relationship
identifier as the Firm Designated ID as
described above. Specifically, FINRA
proposes to amend the definition of
‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in Rule 6810(r) to
state that a Firm Designated ID means,
in relevant part, ‘‘a unique and
persistent relationship identifier when
an Industry Member does not have an
account number available to its order
handling and/or execution system at the
time of order receipt, provided,
however, such identifier must be
masked.’’
(4) Entity Identifiers
The FDID Amendment also permits
Industry Members to provide an entity
identifier, rather than an identifier that
represents a trading account, when an
employee of the Industry Member is
exercising discretion over multiple
client accounts and creates an
aggregated order for which a trading
account number of the Industry Member
is not available at the time of order
origination. An entity identifier is an
identifier of the Industry Member that
represents the firm discretionary
relationship with the client rather than
a firm trading account.
The scenarios in which a firm uses an
entity identifier are comparable to when
a firm uses a relationship identifier (as
described above) except the entity
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
identifier represents the Industry
Member rather than a client. As with
relationship identifiers, entity
identifiers are used in circumstances in
which the account structure is not
available to the trading system at the
time of order placement. In this
workflow, the Industry Member’s order
handling and/or execution system does
not have an account number at the time
of order origination. The relevant clients
that will receive an allocation of the
execution have established accounts
prior to the trade that satisfy relevant
regulatory obligations for opening
accounts, such as Know Your Customer
and other customer obligations.
However, the order origination
workflows operate using entity
identifiers, not accounts.
For Firm Designated ID purposes, as
with the identifier for a trading account
or a relationship, the entity identifier
must be persistent over time. The entity
identifier also must be unique among all
identifiers from any given Industry
Member. Each Industry Member must
make its own risk determination as to
whether it believes it is necessary to
mask the entity identifier when using an
entity identifier to report the Firm
Designated ID to CAT.
An example of the use of an entity
identifier as a Firm Designated ID would
be when Industry Member 1 has an
employee that is a registered
representative that has discretion over
several client accounts held at Industry
Member 1. The registered representative
places an order that he will later
allocate to individual client accounts.
At the time the order is placed, the
trading system only knows it involves a
representative of Industry Member 1
and it does not have a specific trading
account that could be used for Firm
Designated ID reporting. Therefore,
Industry Member 1 could report IM1, its
entity identifier, as the FDID with the
new order.
In accordance with the FDID
Amendment, FINRA proposes to amend
the definition of ‘‘Firm Designated ID’’
in Rule 6810(r) to permit the use of an
entity identifier as a Firm Designated ID
as described above. Specifically, FINRA
proposes to amend the definition of
‘‘Firm Designated ID’’ in Rule 6810(r) to
state that a Firm Designated ID means,
in relevant part, ‘‘a unique and
persistent entity identifier when an
employee of an Industry Member is
exercising discretion over multiple
client accounts and creates an
aggregated order for which a trading
account number of the Industry Member
is not available at the time of order
origination.’’
PO 00000
Frm 00098
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FINRA has filed the proposed rule
change for immediate effectiveness and
has requested that the Commission
waive the requirement that the proposed
rule change not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, so the
proposed rule change can become
operative on the date of filing.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the provisions
of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,6 which
requires, among other things, that
FINRA rules must be designed to
prevent fraudulent and manipulative
acts and practices, to promote just and
equitable principles of trade, and, in
general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and Section 15A(b)(9) of
the Act,7 which requires that FINRA
rules not impose any burden on
competition that is not necessary or
appropriate.
FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act
because it is consistent with and
implements a recent amendment to the
CAT NMS Plan and is designed to assist
FINRA and its Industry Members in
meeting regulatory obligations pursuant
to the Plan. In approving the Plan, the
SEC noted that the Plan ‘‘is necessary
and appropriate in the public interest,
for the protection of investors and the
maintenance of fair and orderly markets,
to remove impediments to, and perfect
the mechanism of a national market
system, or is otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act.’’ 8 To the extent
that this proposed rule change
implements the Plan and applies
specific requirements to Industry
Members, FINRA believes that the
proposed rule change furthers the
objectives of the Plan, as identified by
the SEC, and is therefore consistent with
the Act.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the
proposed rule change will result in any
burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. FINRA notes
that the proposed rule change is
consistent with a recent amendment to
the CAT NMS Plan and is designed to
assist FINRA in meeting its regulatory
obligations pursuant to the Plan. FINRA
also notes that the FDID Amendment
will apply equally to all Industry
Members that trade NMS Securities and
6 15
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(6).
U.S.C. 78o–3(b)(9).
8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318
(November 15, 2016), 81 FR 84696, 84697
(November 23, 2016).
7 15
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 152 / Thursday, August 6, 2020 / Notices
OTC Equity Securities. FINRA
anticipates no new costs to member
firms reporting to the CAT as a result of
this proposal, because any related costs
have already been built in the technical
specifications previously determined
and shared broadly in conformance with
the CAT NMS Plan, as amended. In
addition, FINRA and all national
securities exchanges are proposing this
amendment to their Compliance Rules.
Therefore, this is not a competitive rule
filing and does not impose a burden on
competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither
solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
FINRA has filed the proposed rule
change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 9 and Rule
19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.10 Because the
proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of
investors or the public interest; (ii)
impose any significant burden on
competition; and (iii) become operative
prior to 30 days from the date on which
it was filed, or such shorter time as the
Commission may designate, if
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the
proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)
of the Act 11 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii)
thereunder.12
A proposed rule change filed under
Rule 19b–4(f)(6) 13 normally does not
become operative prior to 30 days after
the date of the filing. However, pursuant
to Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii),14 the
Commission may designate a shorter
time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest. FINRA has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative by July 31, 2020. The
Commission believes that waiver of the
30-day operative delay is consistent
9 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
11 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
12 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires FINRA to give the Commission
written notice of FINRA’s intent to file the proposed
rule change, along with a brief description and text
of the proposed rule change, at least five business
days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the
Commission. FINRA has satisfied this requirement.
13 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
14 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
10 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:13 Aug 05, 2020
Jkt 250001
with the protection of investors and the
public interest because it implements an
amendment to the CAT NMS Plan
approved by the Commission.15
Accordingly, the Commission hereby
waives the 30-day operative delay and
designates the proposal operative as of
July 31, 2020.16
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of this proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission will institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
FINRA–2020–023 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–FINRA–2020–023. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
15 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89397
(July 24, 2020) (Federal Register publication
pending).
16 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission has considered the
proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition,
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
PO 00000
Frm 00099
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
47827
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons
submitting comments are cautioned that
we do not redact or edit personal
identifying information from comment
submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make
available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR–FINRA–
2020–023, and should be submitted on
or before August 27, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.17
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020–17134 Filed 8–5–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89436; File No. SR–ICC–
2020–008]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; ICE
Clear Credit LLC; Order Approving
Proposed Rule Change Relating to the
ICC Exercise Procedures and ICC
Clearing Rules
July 31, 2020.
I. Introduction
On June 3, 2020, ICE Clear Credit LLC
(‘‘ICC’’) filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’),
pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) 1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 a
proposed rule change to formalize and
adopt the ICC Exercise Procedures (the
‘‘Procedures’’) and a related update to
the ICC Clearing Rules (the ‘‘Rules’’) to
accompany the clearing of options on
index credit default swaps (‘‘Index
Swaptions’’).3 The proposed rule change
was published for comment in the
17 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
3 Capitalized terms used but not defined herein
have the meanings specified in the Procedures or
the Rules, as applicable.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\06AUN1.SGM
06AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 152 (Thursday, August 6, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 47824-47827]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-17134]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-89441; File No. SR-FINRA-2020-023]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Financial Industry Regulatory
Authority, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change To Amend the FINRA Rule 6800 Series (Consolidated
Audit Trail Compliance Rule)
July 31, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given that
on July 30, 2020, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc.
(``FINRA'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (``SEC''
or ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I and
II below, which Items have been prepared by FINRA. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
[[Page 47825]]
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
FINRA is proposing to amend the FINRA Rule 6800 Series, FINRA's
compliance rule (``Compliance Rule'') regarding the National Market
System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ``CAT NMS
Plan'' or ``Plan'') \3\ to be consistent with an amendment to the CAT
NMS Plan recently approved by the Commission.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Unless otherwise specified, capitalized terms used in this
rule filing are defined as set forth in the Compliance Rule.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The text of the proposed rule change is available on FINRA's
website at https://www.finra.org, at the principal office of FINRA and
at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, FINRA included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. FINRA has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A,
B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The purpose of this proposed rule change is to amend the Rule 6800
Series, the Compliance Rule regarding the CAT NMS Plan, to be
consistent with an amendment to the CAT NMS Plan recently approved by
the Commission.\4\ The Commission approved an amendment to the CAT NMS
Plan to amend the requirements for Firm Designated IDs in four ways:
(1) To prohibit the use of account numbers as Firm Designated IDs for
trading accounts that are not proprietary accounts; (2) to require that
the Firm Designated ID for a trading account be persistent over time
for each Industry Member so that a single account may be tracked across
time within a single Industry Member; (3) to permit the use of
relationship identifiers as Firm Designated IDs in certain
circumstances; and (4) to permit the use of entity identifiers as Firm
Designated IDs in certain circumstances (the ``FDID Amendment''). As a
result, FINRA proposes to amend the definition of ``Firm Designated
ID'' in Rule 6810 to reflect the changes to the CAT NMS Plan regarding
the requirements for Firm Designated IDs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89397 (July 24,
2020), 85 FR 45941 (July 30, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 6810(r) defines the term ``Firm Designated ID'' to mean ``a
unique identifier for each trading account designated by Industry
Members for purposes of providing data to the Central Repository, where
each such identifier is unique among all identifiers from any given
Industry Member for each business date.''
(1) Prohibit Use of Account Numbers
FINRA proposes to amend the definition of ``Firm Designated ID'' in
Rule 6810(r) to provide that Industry Members may not use account
numbers as the Firm Designated ID for trading accounts that are not
proprietary accounts. Specifically, FINRA proposes to add the following
to the definition of a Firm Designated ID: ``provided, however, such
identifier may not be the account number for such trading account if
the trading account is not a proprietary account.''
(2) Persistent Firm Designated ID
FINRA also proposes to amend the definition of ``Firm Designated
ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to require a Firm Designated ID assigned by an
Industry Member to a trading account to be persistent over time, not
for each business day.\5\ To effect this change, FINRA proposes to
amend the definition of ``Firm Designated ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to add
``and persistent'' after ``unique'' and delete ``for each business
date'' so that the definition of ``Firm Designated ID'' would read, in
relevant part, as follows:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ If an Industry Member assigns a new account number or entity
identifier to a client or customer due to a merger, acquisition or
some other corporate action, then the Industry Member should create
a new Firm Designated ID to identify the new account identifier/
relationship identifier/entity identifier in use at the Industry
Member for the entity. In addition, if a previously assigned Firm
Designated ID is no longer in use by an Industry Member (e.g., if
the trading account associated with the Firm Designated ID has been
closed), then an Industry Member may reuse the Firm Designated ID
for another trading account. The Plan Processor will maintain a
history of the use of each Firm Designated ID, including, for
example, the effective dates of the Firm Designated ID with respect
to each associated trading account.
A unique and persistent identifier for each trading account
designated by Industry Members for purposes of providing data to the
Central Repository . . . where each such identifier is unique among
all identifiers from any given Industry Member.
(3) Relationship Identifiers
The FDID Amendment also permits an Industry Member to provide a
relationship identifier as the Firm Designated ID, rather than an
identifier that represents a trading account, in certain scenarios in
which an Industry Member does not have an account number available to
its order handling and/or execution system at the time of order receipt
(e.g., certain institutional accounts, managed accounts, accounts for
individuals). In such scenarios, the trading account structure may not
be available when a new order is first received from a client and,
instead, only an identifier representing the client's trading
relationship is available. In these limited instances, the Industry
Member may provide an identifier used by the Industry Member to
represent the client's trading relationship with the Industry Member
instead of an account number.
When a trading relationship is established at a broker-dealer for
clients, the broker-dealer typically creates a parent account, under
which additional subaccounts are created. However, in some cases, the
broker-dealer establishes the parent relationship for a client using a
relationship identifier as opposed to an actual parent account. The
relationship identifier could be any of a variety of identifiers, such
as a short name for a relevant individual or institution. This
relationship identifier is established prior to any trading for the
client. If a relationship identifier has been established rather than a
parent account, and an order is placed on behalf of the client, any
executed trades will be kept in a firm account (e.g., a facilitation or
average price account) until they are allocated to the proper
subaccount(s), i.e., the accounts associated with the parent
relationship identifier connecting them to the client.
Relationship identifiers are used in circumstances in which the
account structure is not available to the trading system at the time of
order placement. The clients have established accounts prior to the
trade that satisfy relevant regulatory obligations for opening
accounts, such as Know Your Customer and other customer obligations.
However, the order receipt workflows operate using relationship
identifiers, not accounts.
For Firm Designated ID purposes, as with an identifier for a
trading account, the relationship identifier must be persistent over
time. The relationship identifier also must be unique among all
identifiers from any given Industry Member. With these requirements, a
single relationship could be tracked
[[Page 47826]]
across time within a single Industry Member using the Firm Designated
ID. In addition, the relationship identifier must be masked as the
relationship identifier could be a name or otherwise provide an
indication as to the identity of the relationship. The masking
requirement would avoid potentially revealing the identity of the
relationship.
An example of the use of a relationship identifier as a Firm
Designated ID would be as follows: Suppose that Big Fund Manager is
known in Industry Member A's systems as ``BFM1.'' When an order is
placed by Big Fund Manager, the order is tagged to BFM1. Industry
Member A could use a masked version of BFM1 in place of the Firm
Designated ID representing a trading account when reporting a new order
from Big Fund Manager instead of the account numbers to which executed
shares/contracts will be allocated at a later time via a booking or
other system. Similarly, another example of the use of a relationship
identifier as a Firm Designated ID would involve an individual in place
of the Big Fund Manager in the above example.
In accordance with the FDID Amendment, FINRA proposes to amend the
definition of a ``Firm Designated ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to permit
Industry Members to provide a relationship identifier as the Firm
Designated ID as described above. Specifically, FINRA proposes to amend
the definition of ``Firm Designated ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to state that
a Firm Designated ID means, in relevant part, ``a unique and persistent
relationship identifier when an Industry Member does not have an
account number available to its order handling and/or execution system
at the time of order receipt, provided, however, such identifier must
be masked.''
(4) Entity Identifiers
The FDID Amendment also permits Industry Members to provide an
entity identifier, rather than an identifier that represents a trading
account, when an employee of the Industry Member is exercising
discretion over multiple client accounts and creates an aggregated
order for which a trading account number of the Industry Member is not
available at the time of order origination. An entity identifier is an
identifier of the Industry Member that represents the firm
discretionary relationship with the client rather than a firm trading
account.
The scenarios in which a firm uses an entity identifier are
comparable to when a firm uses a relationship identifier (as described
above) except the entity identifier represents the Industry Member
rather than a client. As with relationship identifiers, entity
identifiers are used in circumstances in which the account structure is
not available to the trading system at the time of order placement. In
this workflow, the Industry Member's order handling and/or execution
system does not have an account number at the time of order
origination. The relevant clients that will receive an allocation of
the execution have established accounts prior to the trade that satisfy
relevant regulatory obligations for opening accounts, such as Know Your
Customer and other customer obligations. However, the order origination
workflows operate using entity identifiers, not accounts.
For Firm Designated ID purposes, as with the identifier for a
trading account or a relationship, the entity identifier must be
persistent over time. The entity identifier also must be unique among
all identifiers from any given Industry Member. Each Industry Member
must make its own risk determination as to whether it believes it is
necessary to mask the entity identifier when using an entity identifier
to report the Firm Designated ID to CAT.
An example of the use of an entity identifier as a Firm Designated
ID would be when Industry Member 1 has an employee that is a registered
representative that has discretion over several client accounts held at
Industry Member 1. The registered representative places an order that
he will later allocate to individual client accounts. At the time the
order is placed, the trading system only knows it involves a
representative of Industry Member 1 and it does not have a specific
trading account that could be used for Firm Designated ID reporting.
Therefore, Industry Member 1 could report IM1, its entity identifier,
as the FDID with the new order.
In accordance with the FDID Amendment, FINRA proposes to amend the
definition of ``Firm Designated ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to permit the use
of an entity identifier as a Firm Designated ID as described above.
Specifically, FINRA proposes to amend the definition of ``Firm
Designated ID'' in Rule 6810(r) to state that a Firm Designated ID
means, in relevant part, ``a unique and persistent entity identifier
when an employee of an Industry Member is exercising discretion over
multiple client accounts and creates an aggregated order for which a
trading account number of the Industry Member is not available at the
time of order origination.''
FINRA has filed the proposed rule change for immediate
effectiveness and has requested that the Commission waive the
requirement that the proposed rule change not become operative for 30
days after the date of the filing, so the proposed rule change can
become operative on the date of filing.
2. Statutory Basis
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
provisions of Section 15A(b)(6) of the Act,\6\ which requires, among
other things, that FINRA rules must be designed to prevent fraudulent
and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, and, in general, to protect investors and the
public interest, and Section 15A(b)(9) of the Act,\7\ which requires
that FINRA rules not impose any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(6).
\7\ 15 U.S.C. 78o-3(b)(9).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FINRA believes that the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Act because it is consistent with and implements a recent amendment to
the CAT NMS Plan and is designed to assist FINRA and its Industry
Members in meeting regulatory obligations pursuant to the Plan. In
approving the Plan, the SEC noted that the Plan ``is necessary and
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors and
the maintenance of fair and orderly markets, to remove impediments to,
and perfect the mechanism of a national market system, or is otherwise
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act.'' \8\ To the extent that
this proposed rule change implements the Plan and applies specific
requirements to Industry Members, FINRA believes that the proposed rule
change furthers the objectives of the Plan, as identified by the SEC,
and is therefore consistent with the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 79318 (November 15,
2016), 81 FR 84696, 84697 (November 23, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
FINRA does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. FINRA notes that the proposed
rule change is consistent with a recent amendment to the CAT NMS Plan
and is designed to assist FINRA in meeting its regulatory obligations
pursuant to the Plan. FINRA also notes that the FDID Amendment will
apply equally to all Industry Members that trade NMS Securities and
[[Page 47827]]
OTC Equity Securities. FINRA anticipates no new costs to member firms
reporting to the CAT as a result of this proposal, because any related
costs have already been built in the technical specifications
previously determined and shared broadly in conformance with the CAT
NMS Plan, as amended. In addition, FINRA and all national securities
exchanges are proposing this amendment to their Compliance Rules.
Therefore, this is not a competitive rule filing and does not impose a
burden on competition.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
Written comments were neither solicited nor received.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
FINRA has filed the proposed rule change pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \9\ and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.\10\
Because the proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the
protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any
significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative prior to
30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as
the Commission may designate, if consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest, the proposed rule change has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \11\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6)(iii) thereunder.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\10\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\11\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\12\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires FINRA to give the Commission written notice of FINRA's
intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five
business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule
change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. FINRA
has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A proposed rule change filed under Rule 19b-4(f)(6) \13\ normally
does not become operative prior to 30 days after the date of the
filing. However, pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii),\14\ the Commission
may designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public interest. FINRA has asked the
Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may
become operative by July 31, 2020. The Commission believes that waiver
of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest because it implements an amendment to
the CAT NMS Plan approved by the Commission.\15\ Accordingly, the
Commission hereby waives the 30-day operative delay and designates the
proposal operative as of July 31, 2020.\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\14\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\15\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 89397 (July 24,
2020) (Federal Register publication pending).
\16\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of this proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission will institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-FINRA-2020-023 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2020-023. This
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of FINRA. All comments received
will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-FINRA-2020-023, and should be submitted
on or before August 27, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\17\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-17134 Filed 8-5-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P