Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Defer Entry Fees for Acquisition Companies, 46198-46200 [2020-16572]

Download as PDF 46198 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Notices designate if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding, or as to which the self-regulatory organization consents, the Commission shall either approve the proposed rule change, disapprove the proposed rule change, or institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. The 45th day after publication of the notice for this proposed rule change is August 2, 2020. The Commission is extending this 45day time period. The Commission finds it appropriate to designate a longer period within which to take action on the proposed rule change so that it has sufficient time to consider the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2, and the comments received. Accordingly, the Commission, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,7 designates September 16, 2020 as the date by which the Commission shall either approve or disapprove, or institute proceedings to determine whether to disapprove, the proposed rule change, as modified by Amendment Nos. 1 and 2 (File No. SR–CBOE–2020– 050). For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.8 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–16569 Filed 7–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Release No. 34–89403; File No. SR– NASDAQ–2020–038] Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To Defer Entry Fees for Acquisition Companies July 27, 2020. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (‘‘Act’’) 1, and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on July 14, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (‘‘Nasdaq’’ or ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange proposes to defer entry fees for Acquisition Companies for one year from the date of listing and to make minor attendant technical changes. The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange’s website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/ rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose In 2009 Nasdaq adopted a rule (IM– 5101–2) to impose additional listing requirements on a company whose business plan is to complete an initial public offering and engage in a merger or acquisition with one or more unidentified companies within a specific period of time (‘‘Acquisition Companies’’).3 Based on experience listing these companies, Nasdaq proposes to modify the process of assessing entry fees applicable to them on all three tiers of Nasdaq. Specifically, for an Acquisition Company listed under IM–5101–2 on the Nasdaq Global or Global Select Market, Nasdaq proposes to defer the entry fee described in Listing Rule 5910(a)(1) for one year from the date of listing. Similarly, for an Acquisition Company listed under IM– 5101–2 on the Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq proposes to defer the entry fee described in Listing Rule 5920(a)(1) for one year from the date of listing. For the avoidance of doubt, in each case, such fee is owed to Nasdaq at the time of 7 Id. 8 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(31). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58228 (July 25, 2008), 73 FR 44794 (July 31, 2008) (adopting the predecessor to IM–5101–2). 1 15 VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jul 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 listing based on the fee schedule in effect on the date of listing but is assessed by Nasdaq on the first anniversary of the date of listing. Acquisition Companies are formed to raise capital in an initial public offering (IPO) with the purpose of using the proceeds to acquire one or more unspecified businesses or assets to be identified after the IPO. However, unlike other types of listed companies that have pre-existing operations or that fund their operations by proceeds raised from the IPO, following the IPO, an Acquisition Company funds a trust account with an amount typically equal to 100% of the gross proceeds of the IPO.4 As such, operating expenses are typically borne by the Acquisition Company’s sponsors, particularly during the initial post-IPO period. The Acquisition Company’s sponsor is the entity or management team that forms the Acquisition Company and, typically, runs the operations of the Acquisition Company until an appropriate target company is identified and the business combination is consummated. The funds in the trust account are typically invested in short-term U.S. government securities or held as cash, earning interest over time. Thus, Acquisition Company unique structure results in sponsor’s extreme fee sensitivity, particularly during the initial post-IPO period before any substantial amount of interest is earned from the trust account. Nasdaq believes that the market practice of depositing 100% of the gross proceeds of the IPO in a trust account (rather than the minimum required 90%) benefits shareholders and is consistent with investor protection because it helps assure that shareholders exercising their right to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account will receive the full IPO price paid, rather than a lesser amount guaranteed by Nasdaq rules.5 Accordingly, to encourage this market practice Nasdaq believes it is appropriate to defer the payment of the entry fees owed by an Acquisition Company listed on Nasdaq until the first anniversary of the date of listing. Nasdaq believes that the proposed fee deferral would provide an incentive to sponsors to list Acquisition Companies 4 While under Nasdaq’s rules an Acquisition Company could pay operating and other expenses, subject to a limitation that 90% of the gross proceeds of the company’s offering must be retained in trust account, Nasdaq understands that marketplace demands typically dictate that 100% of the gross proceeds from the IPO be kept in the trust account and that only interest earned on that account be used to pay taxes and a limited amount of operating expenses. See Listing Rule IM–5101– 2 (a). 5 See Listing Rule IM–5101–2 (d) and (e). E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Notices on Nasdaq. Nasdaq also believes it is reasonable to balance its need to remain competitive with other listing venues, while at the same time ensuring adequate revenue to meet is regulatory responsibilities. Nasdaq notes that the fee deferral will not cause any reduction to Nasdaq’s revenue and no other company will be required to pay higher fees as a result of the proposed amendments and represents that the proposed fee deferral will have no impact on the resources available for its regulatory programs. Nasdaq also proposes to amend Listing Rules 5910(a)(11) and 5920(a)(11) to clarify that Acquisition Companies listed under IM–5101–2 are subject to the application fees described in these rules. This will also help assure that there is no impact on the resources available for Nasdaq’s regulatory programs. Finally, Nasdaq proposes to amend the reference in Listing Rule 5920(a)(1) to correctly cross reference Listing Rule 5920(a)(11), which describes the assessment of application fees on the Nasdaq Capital Market. 2. Statutory Basis The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,6 in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,7 in particular, in that it provides for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers. As a preliminary matter, Nasdaq competes for listings with other national securities exchanges and companies can easily choose to list on, or transfer to, those alternative venues. As a result, the fees Nasdaq can charge listed companies are constrained by the fees charged by its competitors and Nasdaq cannot charge prices in a manner that would be unreasonable, inequitable, or unfairly discriminatory. Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change to defer the entry fees described in Listing Rules 5910(a)(1) and 5920(a)(1) for one year from the date of listing is reasonable and not unfairly discriminatory because it recognizes the unique structure Acquisition Companies that results in sponsor’s extreme fee sensitivity, particularly during the initial post-IPO period before any substantial amount of interest is earned from the trust account. 6 15 7 15 U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 18:33 Jul 30, 2020 Jkt 250001 Unlike other companies, which have pre-existing operations and immediate access to the IPO proceeds, Acquisition Companies are unique because at least 90%, and typically 100%, of the IPO proceeds are held in trust for the shareholders and are not available to fund their operations. Acquisition Companies also do not have any prior operations that generate cash that could be used to fund their operations. Nasdaq also believes that the proposed fee deferral is reasonable in that it will create a commercial incentive for sponsors to list Acquisition Companies on Nasdaq. Nasdaq competes for listings, in part, by the level of its listing fees, and the proposed deferral of the entry fees for Acquisition Companies based on the unique issues associated with their structure is similarly a reasonable basis on which for Nasdaq to distinguish itself from competitors. Nasdaq also notes that no other company will be required to pay higher fees as a result of the proposed amendments. Therefore, Nasdaq believes that allowing an Acquisition Company to pay entry fees on a deferred basis is reasonable and not inequitable or unfairly discriminatory. Finally, Nasdaq believes that the proposal to defer such fees is consistent with the investor protection objectives of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act in that they are designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments to a free and open market and national market system, and in general to protect investors and the public interest. Specifically, the amount of revenue deferred by allowing Acquisition Companies to pay entry fees one year from the date of listing is not substantial, and the fee deferral may result in more Acquisition Companies listing on Nasdaq, thereby increasing the resources available for Nasdaq’s listing compliance program, which helps assure that listing standards are properly enforced and investors are protected. In addition, Nasdaq believes that the market practice of depositing 100% of the gross proceeds of the IPO in a trust account for the benefit of shareholders (rather than the required 90%) benefits those shareholders and is consistent with the investor protection goals of the Act because it helps assure that shareholders exercising their right to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account will receive the full IPO price paid, rather than a lesser amount guaranteed by Nasdaq rules. Nasdaq believes that the potential impact on revenue from the entry fee deferral, as proposed, will not hinder its PO 00000 Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 46199 ability to fulfill its regulatory responsibilities. Nasdaq also believes that the proposed rule change to amend Listing Rules 5910(a)(11) and 5920(a)(11) to clarify that Acquisition Companies listed under IM–5101–2 are subject to the application fees described in these rules and to amend the reference in Listing Rule 5920(a)(1) to correctly cross reference Listing Rule 5920(a)(11), which describes the assessment of application fees, is designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade by eliminating potential confusion about Nasdaq rules by clarifying these rules and updating an inaccurate crossreference, without changing the substance of the rules. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The market for listing services is extremely competitive and listed companies may freely choose alternative venues based on the aggregate fees assessed, and the value provided by each listing. This rule proposal does not burden competition with other listing venues, which are similarly free to set their fees. For these reasons, Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition for listings. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.8 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule should be approved or disapproved. 8 15 E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii). 31JYN1 46200 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 148 / Friday, July 31, 2020 / Notices IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ–2020–038 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2020–038. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR– NASDAQ–2020–038 and should be submitted on or before August 21, 2020. 18:33 Jul 30, 2020 [FR Doc. 2020–16572 Filed 7–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Electronic Comments VerDate Sep<11>2014 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.9 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. Jkt 250001 [Release No. 34–89401; File No. SR–CBOE– 2020–068] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change Relating To Amend Rule 10.3 by Extending the Credit Option Margin Pilot Program Through September 1, 2021 July 27, 2020. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on July 17, 2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6) thereunder.4 The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) proposes to amend Rule 10.3 by extending the Credit Option Margin Pilot Program through September 1, 2021. The text of the proposed rule change is provided in Exhibit 5. The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (https://www.cboe.com/ AboutCBOE/ CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. PO 00000 9 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii). 4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 1 15 Frm 00134 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose On February 2, 2011, the Commission approved the Exchange’s proposal to establish a Credit Option Margin Pilot Program (‘‘Program’’).5 The proposal became effective on a pilot basis to run on a parallel track with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) Rule 4240 that similarly operates on an interim pilot basis.6 On January 17, 2012, the Exchange filed a rule change to, among other things, decouple the Program with the FINRA program and to extend the expiration date of the Program to January 17, 2013.7 The Program, however, continues to be substantially similar to the provisions of the FINRA program. Subsequently, the Exchange filed rule changes to extend the program until January 17, 2014, January 16, 2015, January 15, 2016, January 17, 2017, July 18, 2017, July 18, 2018, July 18, 2019 and July 20, 2020, respectively.8 The 5 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 63819 (February 2, 2011), 76 FR 6838 (February 8, 2011) order approving (SR–CBOE–2010–106). To implement the Program, the Exchange amended Rule 10.3(l), Margin Requirements, to make Cboe Option’s margin requirements for Credit Options consistent with Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (‘‘FINRA’’) Rule 4240, Margin Requirements for Credit Default Swaps. Cboe Options Credit Options (i.e., Credit Default Options and Credit Default Basket Options) are analogous to credit default swaps. 6 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 59955 (May 22, 2009), 74 FR 25586 (May 28, 2009) (Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change; SR–FINRA–2009–012). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 66163 (January 17, 2012), 77 FR 3318 (January 23, 2012) (SR–CBOE–2012–007). 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release Nos. 68539 (December 27, 2012), 78 FR 138 (January 2, 2013) (SR–CBOE–2012–125), 71124 (December 18, 2013), 78 FR 77754 (December 24, 2013) (SR–CBOE–2013– 123), 73837 (December 15, 2014), 79 FR 75850 (December 19, 2014) (SR–CBOE–2014–091), 76824 (January 5, 2016), 81 FR 1255 (January 11, 2016) (SR–CBOE–2015–118), 79621 (December 14, 2016) E:\FR\FM\31JYN1.SGM 31JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 148 (Friday, July 31, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 46198-46200]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16572]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89403; File No. SR-NASDAQ-2020-038]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC; 
Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of Proposed Rule Change To 
Defer Entry Fees for Acquisition Companies

July 27, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 
(``Act'') \1\, and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given 
that on July 14, 2020, The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (``Nasdaq'' or 
``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, 
and III, below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The 
Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the 
proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    The Exchange proposes to defer entry fees for Acquisition Companies 
for one year from the date of listing and to make minor attendant 
technical changes.
    The text of the proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's 
website at https://listingcenter.nasdaq.com/rulebook/nasdaq/rules, at 
the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public 
Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements 
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and 
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The 
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in 
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in 
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such 
statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    In 2009 Nasdaq adopted a rule (IM-5101-2) to impose additional 
listing requirements on a company whose business plan is to complete an 
initial public offering and engage in a merger or acquisition with one 
or more unidentified companies within a specific period of time 
(``Acquisition Companies'').\3\ Based on experience listing these 
companies, Nasdaq proposes to modify the process of assessing entry 
fees applicable to them on all three tiers of Nasdaq. Specifically, for 
an Acquisition Company listed under IM-5101-2 on the Nasdaq Global or 
Global Select Market, Nasdaq proposes to defer the entry fee described 
in Listing Rule 5910(a)(1) for one year from the date of listing. 
Similarly, for an Acquisition Company listed under IM-5101-2 on the 
Nasdaq Capital Market, Nasdaq proposes to defer the entry fee described 
in Listing Rule 5920(a)(1) for one year from the date of listing. For 
the avoidance of doubt, in each case, such fee is owed to Nasdaq at the 
time of listing based on the fee schedule in effect on the date of 
listing but is assessed by Nasdaq on the first anniversary of the date 
of listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ Securities Exchange Act Release No. 58228 (July 25, 2008), 
73 FR 44794 (July 31, 2008) (adopting the predecessor to IM-5101-2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Acquisition Companies are formed to raise capital in an initial 
public offering (IPO) with the purpose of using the proceeds to acquire 
one or more unspecified businesses or assets to be identified after the 
IPO. However, unlike other types of listed companies that have pre-
existing operations or that fund their operations by proceeds raised 
from the IPO, following the IPO, an Acquisition Company funds a trust 
account with an amount typically equal to 100% of the gross proceeds of 
the IPO.\4\ As such, operating expenses are typically borne by the 
Acquisition Company's sponsors, particularly during the initial post-
IPO period. The Acquisition Company's sponsor is the entity or 
management team that forms the Acquisition Company and, typically, runs 
the operations of the Acquisition Company until an appropriate target 
company is identified and the business combination is consummated. The 
funds in the trust account are typically invested in short-term U.S. 
government securities or held as cash, earning interest over time. 
Thus, Acquisition Company unique structure results in sponsor's extreme 
fee sensitivity, particularly during the initial post-IPO period before 
any substantial amount of interest is earned from the trust account. 
Nasdaq believes that the market practice of depositing 100% of the 
gross proceeds of the IPO in a trust account (rather than the minimum 
required 90%) benefits shareholders and is consistent with investor 
protection because it helps assure that shareholders exercising their 
right to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account 
will receive the full IPO price paid, rather than a lesser amount 
guaranteed by Nasdaq rules.\5\ Accordingly, to encourage this market 
practice Nasdaq believes it is appropriate to defer the payment of the 
entry fees owed by an Acquisition Company listed on Nasdaq until the 
first anniversary of the date of listing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ While under Nasdaq's rules an Acquisition Company could pay 
operating and other expenses, subject to a limitation that 90% of 
the gross proceeds of the company's offering must be retained in 
trust account, Nasdaq understands that marketplace demands typically 
dictate that 100% of the gross proceeds from the IPO be kept in the 
trust account and that only interest earned on that account be used 
to pay taxes and a limited amount of operating expenses. See Listing 
Rule IM-5101-2 (a).
    \5\ See Listing Rule IM-5101-2 (d) and (e).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Nasdaq believes that the proposed fee deferral would provide an 
incentive to sponsors to list Acquisition Companies

[[Page 46199]]

on Nasdaq. Nasdaq also believes it is reasonable to balance its need to 
remain competitive with other listing venues, while at the same time 
ensuring adequate revenue to meet is regulatory responsibilities. 
Nasdaq notes that the fee deferral will not cause any reduction to 
Nasdaq's revenue and no other company will be required to pay higher 
fees as a result of the proposed amendments and represents that the 
proposed fee deferral will have no impact on the resources available 
for its regulatory programs.
    Nasdaq also proposes to amend Listing Rules 5910(a)(11) and 
5920(a)(11) to clarify that Acquisition Companies listed under IM-5101-
2 are subject to the application fees described in these rules. This 
will also help assure that there is no impact on the resources 
available for Nasdaq's regulatory programs.
    Finally, Nasdaq proposes to amend the reference in Listing Rule 
5920(a)(1) to correctly cross reference Listing Rule 5920(a)(11), which 
describes the assessment of application fees on the Nasdaq Capital 
Market.
2. Statutory Basis
    The Exchange believes that its proposal is consistent with Section 
6(b) of the Act,\6\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Sections 
6(b)(4) and 6(b)(5) of the Act,\7\ in particular, in that it provides 
for the equitable allocation of reasonable dues, fees and other charges 
among members and issuers and other persons using any facility, and is 
not designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, 
issuers, brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \7\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(4) and (5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As a preliminary matter, Nasdaq competes for listings with other 
national securities exchanges and companies can easily choose to list 
on, or transfer to, those alternative venues. As a result, the fees 
Nasdaq can charge listed companies are constrained by the fees charged 
by its competitors and Nasdaq cannot charge prices in a manner that 
would be unreasonable, inequitable, or unfairly discriminatory.
    Nasdaq believes that the proposed rule change to defer the entry 
fees described in Listing Rules 5910(a)(1) and 5920(a)(1) for one year 
from the date of listing is reasonable and not unfairly discriminatory 
because it recognizes the unique structure Acquisition Companies that 
results in sponsor's extreme fee sensitivity, particularly during the 
initial post-IPO period before any substantial amount of interest is 
earned from the trust account. Unlike other companies, which have pre-
existing operations and immediate access to the IPO proceeds, 
Acquisition Companies are unique because at least 90%, and typically 
100%, of the IPO proceeds are held in trust for the shareholders and 
are not available to fund their operations. Acquisition Companies also 
do not have any prior operations that generate cash that could be used 
to fund their operations. Nasdaq also believes that the proposed fee 
deferral is reasonable in that it will create a commercial incentive 
for sponsors to list Acquisition Companies on Nasdaq. Nasdaq competes 
for listings, in part, by the level of its listing fees, and the 
proposed deferral of the entry fees for Acquisition Companies based on 
the unique issues associated with their structure is similarly a 
reasonable basis on which for Nasdaq to distinguish itself from 
competitors.
    Nasdaq also notes that no other company will be required to pay 
higher fees as a result of the proposed amendments. Therefore, Nasdaq 
believes that allowing an Acquisition Company to pay entry fees on a 
deferred basis is reasonable and not inequitable or unfairly 
discriminatory.
    Finally, Nasdaq believes that the proposal to defer such fees is 
consistent with the investor protection objectives of Section 6(b)(5) 
of the Act in that they are designed to promote just and equitable 
principles of trade, to remove impediments to a free and open market 
and national market system, and in general to protect investors and the 
public interest. Specifically, the amount of revenue deferred by 
allowing Acquisition Companies to pay entry fees one year from the date 
of listing is not substantial, and the fee deferral may result in more 
Acquisition Companies listing on Nasdaq, thereby increasing the 
resources available for Nasdaq's listing compliance program, which 
helps assure that listing standards are properly enforced and investors 
are protected. In addition, Nasdaq believes that the market practice of 
depositing 100% of the gross proceeds of the IPO in a trust account for 
the benefit of shareholders (rather than the required 90%) benefits 
those shareholders and is consistent with the investor protection goals 
of the Act because it helps assure that shareholders exercising their 
right to redeem their shares for a pro rata share of the trust account 
will receive the full IPO price paid, rather than a lesser amount 
guaranteed by Nasdaq rules.
    Nasdaq believes that the potential impact on revenue from the entry 
fee deferral, as proposed, will not hinder its ability to fulfill its 
regulatory responsibilities.
    Nasdaq also believes that the proposed rule change to amend Listing 
Rules 5910(a)(11) and 5920(a)(11) to clarify that Acquisition Companies 
listed under IM-5101-2 are subject to the application fees described in 
these rules and to amend the reference in Listing Rule 5920(a)(1) to 
correctly cross reference Listing Rule 5920(a)(11), which describes the 
assessment of application fees, is designed to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade by eliminating potential confusion about 
Nasdaq rules by clarifying these rules and updating an inaccurate 
cross-reference, without changing the substance of the rules.

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will result 
in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as amended. The market for 
listing services is extremely competitive and listed companies may 
freely choose alternative venues based on the aggregate fees assessed, 
and the value provided by each listing. This rule proposal does not 
burden competition with other listing venues, which are similarly free 
to set their fees. For these reasons, Nasdaq does not believe that the 
proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition for 
listings.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    No written comments were either solicited or received.

III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for 
Commission Action

    The foregoing rule change has become effective pursuant to Section 
19(b)(3)(A)(ii) of the Act.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule 
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule 
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is: (i) 
Necessary or appropriate in the public interest; (ii) for the 
protection of investors; or (iii) otherwise in furtherance of the 
purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the 
Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the 
proposed rule should be approved or disapproved.

[[Page 46200]]

IV. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-038 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-038. This 
file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To 
help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from submissions. You should submit only information that 
you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to 
File Number SR-NASDAQ-2020-038 and should be submitted on or before 
August 21, 2020.

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-16572 Filed 7-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.