Silicon Metal from the Republic of Kazakhstan: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 45173-45177 [2020-16221]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 144 / Monday, July 27, 2020 / Notices
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Amendments to Revise the Trade
Mission Dates, and Deadline for
Submitting Applications.
Background
The United States Department of
Commerce, International Trade
Administration, is amending the Notice
published at 85 FR 12259 (March 10,
2020), regarding the dates of ITA’s
planned Cybersecurity Business
Development Mission to Peru, Chile,
and Uruguay, with an optional stop in
Argentina, which have been modified
from October 5–9, and 13, 2020, to
March 1–5, and 8, 2021. The new
deadline for applications has been
extended to November 13, 2020.
Applications may be accepted after that
date if space remains and scheduling
constraints permit. Interested U.S.
companies and trade associations/
organizations that have not already
Sunday, February 28, 2021 ......................................................................
Monday, March 1, 2021 ...........................................................................
Tuesday, March 2, 2021. .........................................................................
Wednesday, March 3, 2021 .....................................................................
Thursday, March 4, 2021 .........................................................................
Friday, March 5, 2021 ..............................................................................
Saturday–Sunday, March 6–7, 2021 ........................................................
Tuesday, March 8, 2021 (Optional) .........................................................
The U.S. Department of Commerce
will review applications and make
selection decisions on a rolling basis in
accordance with the Notice published at
85 FR 12259 (March 10, 2020). The
applicants selected will be notified as
soon as possible.
Contacts
Gemal Brangman, Senior Advisor, Trade
Missions, Trade Events Task Force,
Washington, DC, 202–482–3773,
Gemal.Brangman@trade.gov
Paul Matino, Senior International Trade
Specialist, Baltimore, MD—USEAC,
410–962–4539, Paul.Matino@
trade.gov
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Peru
Leon Skarshinski, Commercial Officer,
U.S. Embassy—Lima, Peru,
Leon.Skarshinski@trade.gov
Chile
Joshua Leibowitz, Commercial Officer,
U.S. Embassy—Santiago, Chile,
Joshua.Leibowitz@trade.gov
Uruguay
Matthew Poole, Senior Commercial
Officer, U.S. Embassy—Montevideo,
Uruguay, Matthew.Poole@trade.gov
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
Gemal Brangman,
Senior Advisor, Trade Missions, ITA Events
Management Task Force.
[FR Doc. 2020–16139 Filed 7–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DR–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C–834–811]
Silicon Metal from the Republic of
Kazakhstan: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable July 20, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Justin Neuman; AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
AGENCY:
Fmt 4703
Proposed Timetable
* Note: The final schedule and
potential site visits will depend on the
availability of host government and
business officials, specific goals of
mission participants, and ground
transportation.
Trade Mission Participants Arrive in Lima, Peru.
Welcome and Country Briefing (Peru).
Presentations and/or cabinet/ministry meetings.
Networking Lunch.
One-on-One business matchmaking appointments.
Networking Reception at Ambassador’s residence (TBC).
Travel to Santiago, Chile.
Welcome and Country Briefing (Chile).
Presentations.
One-on-One business matchmaking appointments.
Networking Lunch.
Cabinet/Ministry meetings.
Networking Reception at Ambassador’s residence (TBC).
(Morning) Travel to Montevideo, Uruguay.
(Afternoon) Welcome and Briefing.
Presentations by Uruguayan government entities.
(Morning) Business atchmaking.
Closing Ambassador’s reception (TBC).
(Afternoon) Trade mission participants depart for optional Argentina
stop or return home.
• Travel day (End of Mission) or free time for Argentina optional stop
participants.
• Welcome and Country Briefing (Argentina).
• One-on-One business matchmaking appointments.
Karen Ballard, Commercial Officer, U.S.
Embassy—Santiago, Chile,
Karen.Ballard@trade.gov
Frm 00015
submitted an application are
encouraged to do so. The schedule is
updated as follows:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Argentina
PO 00000
45173
Sfmt 4703
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0486.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On June 30, 2020, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) received a
countervailing duty (CVD) petition
concerning imports of silicon metal
from the Republic of Kazakhstan
(Kazakhstan), filed in proper form on
behalf of the petitioners,1 domestic
producers of silicon metal.2 The Petition
was accompanied by antidumping duty
(AD) petitions concerning imports of
silicon metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia.
On July 6 and 7, 2020, Commerce
requested supplemental information
pertaining to certain aspects of the
Petition in separate supplemental
questionnaires.3 The petitioners filed
1 The petitioners are Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.
and Mississippi Silicon LLC.
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties: Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iceland, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Malaysia,’’
dated June 30, 2020 (the Petition).
3 See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
Continued
27JYN1
45174
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 144 / Monday, July 27, 2020 / Notices
responses to the supplemental
questionnaires on July 8 and 10, 2020,
respectively.4
In accordance with section 702(b)(1)
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended
(the Act), the petitioners allege that the
Government of Kazakhstan (GOK) is
providing countervailable subsidies,
within the meaning of sections 701 and
771(5) of the Act, to producers of silicon
metal in Kazakhstan, and that imports of
such products are materially injuring, or
threatening material injury to, the
domestic silicon metal industry in the
United States. Consistent with section
702(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(b), for those alleged programs
on which we are initiating a CVD
investigation, the petitioners provided
reasonably available information in the
Petition to support their allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioners
filed the Petition on behalf of the
domestic industry, because the
petitioners are an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
Commerce also finds that the petitioners
demonstrated sufficient industry
support necessary for the initiation of
the requested CVD investigation.5
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on June
30, 2020, the period of investigation is
January 1, 2019 through December 31,
2019.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this
investigation is silicon metal from
Kazakhstan. For a full description of the
scope of this investigation, see the
appendix to this notice.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Scope Comments
As discussed in the Preamble to
Commerce’s regulations, we are setting
aside a period for interested parties to
raise issues regarding product coverage
(i.e., scope).6 Commerce will consider
all comments received from interested
parties and, if necessary, will consult
with interested parties prior to the
Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iceland, and Malaysia and Countervailing Duties on
Imports from Kazakhstan: Supplemental
Questions,’’ dated July 6, 2020; and ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Countervailing Duties on Imports of
Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan: Supplemental
Questions,’’ dated July 7, 2020.
4 See Petitioners’ Letters, ‘‘Silicon Metal from
Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia and
Kazakhstan: General Volume Petition Supplement,’’
dated July 8, 2020 (General Issues Supplement); and
‘‘Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan: Volume V Petition
Supplement,’’ dated July 10, 2020.
5 See the ‘‘Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition’’ section, infra.
6 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997)
(Preamble).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
issuance of the preliminary
determination. If scope comments
include factual information,7 all such
factual information should be limited to
public information. Commerce requests
that all interested parties submit such
comments by 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time
(ET) on August 10, 2020, which is 21
calendar days from the signature date of
this notice. Any rebuttal comments,
which may include factual information,
must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on August
20, 2020, which is 10 calendar days
from the initial comment deadline.
Commerce requests that any factual
information parties consider relevant to
the scope of the investigation be
submitted during this period. However,
if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information
pertaining to the scope of the
investigation may be relevant, the party
may contact Commerce and request
permission to submit the additional
information. All such submissions must
also be filed on the records of the
concurrent AD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be
filed electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
unless an exception applies.8 An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the time and date it is due.
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i)
and (ii) of the Act, Commerce notified
representatives of the GOK of the receipt
of the Petition and provided them the
opportunity for consultations with
respect to the Petition.9 Consultations
were held with the GOK on July 13,
2020.10 The GOK submitted
consultation remarks on July 14, 2020.11
7 See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ‘‘factual
information’’).
8 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System
Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014), for details
of Commerce’s electronic filing requirements,
effective August 5, 2011. Information on help using
ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/
help.aspx, and a handbook can be found at https://
access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on
%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
9 See Commerce’s Letter, ‘‘Countervailing Duty
Petition on Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan:
Invitation for Consultations,’’ dated July 1, 2020.
10 See Memorandum, ‘‘Consultations with
Officials from the Government of the Republic of
Kazakhstan Regarding the Countervailing Duty
Investigation of Silicon Metal from the Republic of
Kazakhstan,’’ dated July 14, 2020.
11 See GOK’s Letter, ‘‘Silicon Metal from
Kazakhstan,’’ dated July 14, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Determination of Industry Support for
the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires
that a petition be filed on behalf of the
domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A)
of the Act provides that a petition meets
this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the
petition account for: (i) at least 25
percent of the total production of the
domestic like product; and (ii) more
than 50 percent of the production of the
domestic like product produced by that
portion of the industry expressing
support for, or opposition to, the
petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D)
of the Act provides that, if the petition
does not establish support of domestic
producers or workers accounting for
more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product,
Commerce shall: (i) Poll the industry or
rely on other information in order to
determine if there is support for the
petition, as required by subparagraph
(A); or (ii) determine industry support
using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ‘‘industry.’’
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines
the ‘‘industry’’ as the producers as a
whole of a domestic like product. Thus,
to determine whether a petition has the
requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers
and workers who produce the domestic
like product. The International Trade
Commission (ITC), which is responsible
for determining whether ‘‘the domestic
industry’’ has been injured, must also
determine what constitutes a domestic
like product in order to define the
industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC must apply the same statutory
definition regarding the domestic like
product,12 they do so for different
purposes and pursuant to a separate and
distinct authority. In addition,
Commerce’s determination is subject to
limitations of time and information.
Although this may result in different
definitions of the like product, such
differences do not render the decision of
either agency contrary to law.13
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the
domestic like product as ‘‘a product
which is like, or in the absence of like,
most similar in characteristics and uses
with, the article subject to an
investigation under this title.’’ Thus, the
reference point from which the
domestic like product analysis begins is
‘‘the article subject to an investigation’’
(i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to
12 See
section 771(10) of the Act.
USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp.
2d 1, 8 (CIT 2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd.
v. United States, 688 F. Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988),
aff’d 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
13 See
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 144 / Monday, July 27, 2020 / Notices
be investigated, which normally will be
the scope as defined in the petition).
With regard to the domestic like
product, the petitioners do not offer a
definition of the domestic like product
distinct from the scope of the
investigation.14 Based on our analysis of
the information submitted on the
record, we have determined that silicon
metal, as defined in the scope,
constitutes a single domestic like
product, and we have analyzed industry
support in terms of that domestic like
product.15
In determining whether the
petitioners have standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered
the industry support data contained in
the Petition with reference to the
domestic like product as defined in the
‘‘Scope of the Investigation,’’ in the
appendix to this notice. To establish
industry support, the petitioners
provided their actual 2019 production
of the domestic like product.16 To
estimate the 2019 production for the
entire U.S. silicon metal industry, the
petitioners relied on their own 2019
production data and estimated
production data reported for the nonpetitioning producer (DC Alabama).17
We relied on data provided by the
petitioners for purposes of measuring
industry support.18
Our review of the data provided in the
Petition, the General Issues Supplement,
and other information readily available
to Commerce indicates that the
petitioners have established industry
support for the Petition.19 First, the
Petition established support from
domestic producers (or workers)
accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like
product and, as such, Commerce is not
required to take further action in order
14 See
Volume I of the Petition at 25–28.
a discussion of the domestic like product
analysis as applied to these cases, and information
regarding industry support, see the Kazakhstan CVD
Initiation Checklist at Attachment II (‘‘Analysis of
Industry Support for the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Silicon
Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland,
Malaysia, and Kazakhstan’’) (Attachment II). This
checklist is dated concurrently with, and hereby
adopted by, this notice and is on file electronically
via ACCESS.
16 See Volume I of the Petition at 3–4 and Exhibits
I–2 and I–3; see also General Issues Supplement at
2.
17 See Volume I of the Petition at 3–4 and Exhibit
I–5; see also General Issues Supplement at 2.
18 See Volume I of the Petition at 3–4 and Exhibit
I–5; see also General Issues Supplement at 2. For
further discussion, see Attachment II of the
Kazakhstan CVD Initiation Checklist.
19 See Volume I of the Petition at 3–4 and Exhibits
I–2, I–3, and I–5; see also General Issues
Supplement at 2. For further discussion, see
Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
15 For
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
to evaluate industry support (e.g.,
polling).20 Second, the domestic
producers (or workers) have met the
statutory criteria for industry support
under section 702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act
because the domestic producers (or
workers) who support the Petition
account for at least 25 percent of the
total production of the domestic like
product.21 Finally, the domestic
producers (or workers) have met the
statutory criteria for industry support
under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act
because the domestic producers (or
workers) who support the Petition
account for more than 50 percent of the
production of the domestic like product
produced by that portion of the industry
expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition.22 Accordingly, Commerce
determines that the Petition was filed on
behalf of the domestic industry within
the meaning of section 702(b)(1) of the
Act.23
Injury Test
Because Kazakhstan is a ‘‘Subsidies
Agreement Country’’ within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act,
section 701(a)(2) of the Act applies to
this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC
must determine whether imports of the
subject merchandise from Kazakhstan
materially injure, or threaten material
injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material
Injury and Causation
The petitioners allege that imports of
the subject merchandise are benefitting
from countervailable subsidies and that
such imports are causing, or threaten to
cause, material injury to the U.S.
industry producing the domestic like
product. In addition, the petitioners
allege that subject imports exceed the
negligibility threshold provided for
under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.24
The petitioners contend that the
industry’s injured condition is
illustrated by a significant and
increasing volume of subject imports;
declining market share; underselling;
price depression and suppression; lost
sales and revenues; declines in capacity,
production, shipments, employment,
prices, revenue, and profitability; and
declining financial performance.25 We
20 See Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD
Initiation Checklist; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act.
21 See Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD
Initiation Checklist.
22 Id.
23 Id.
24 See Volume I of the Petition at 31 and Exhibit
I–31.
25 See Volume I of the Petition at 41–68 and
Exhibits I–1, I–5 through I–7, I–10, I–13, I–15, I–16,
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
45175
assessed the allegations and supporting
evidence regarding material injury,
threat of material injury, causation, and
negligibility, and we have determined
that these allegations are properly
supported by adequate evidence and
meet the statutory requirements for
initiation.26
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon an examination of the
Petition and supplemental responses,
we find that the Petition meets the
requirements of section 702 of the Act.
Therefore, we are initiating a CVD
investigation to determine whether
imports of silicon metal from
Kazakhstan benefit from countervailable
subsidies conferred by the GOK.
Based on our review of the Petition,
we find that there is sufficient
information to initiate a CVD
investigation on all eight of the alleged
programs. For a full discussion of the
basis for our decision to initiate on each
program, see Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist. A public version of the
initiation checklist for this investigation
is available on ACCESS. In accordance
with section 703(b)(1) of the Act and 19
CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed,
we will make our preliminary
determination no later than 65 days
after the date of this initiation.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioners named
two companies as producers of silicon
metal in Kazakhstan, as well as two
additional companies as potential
exporters.27 On July 10, 2020,
Commerce released U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S.
imports of silicon metal from
Kazakhstan under the appropriate
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States numbers listed in the
appendix to this notice under
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
to all parties with access to information
protected by APO and indicated that
interested parties wishing to comment
on the CBP data must do so within three
business days of the publication date of
the notice of initiation of this
investigation.28 However, based on the
I–18, I–20, I–23, I–24, I–32, I–34, and I–37 through
I–59.
26 See Kazakhstan CVD Initiation Checklist at
Attachment III (‘‘Analysis of Allegations and
Evidence of Material Injury and Causation for the
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, Kazakhstan, and Malaysia’’)
(Attachment III).
27 See Volume I of the Petition at 2.
28 See Memorandum, ‘‘Petition for the Imposition
of Countervailing Duties on Imports of Silicon
Metal from Kazakhstan: Release of Entry Data,’’
dated July 10, 2020.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
45176
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 144 / Monday, July 27, 2020 / Notices
CBP data, Commerce determines that
there was not a large number of
producers/exporters of silicon metal
during the POI. Commerce therefore
intends to follow its standard practice in
CVD investigations and calculate
company-specific subsidy rates for each
publicly-identifiable company included
in the CBP data. Therefore, we are
selecting JSC NMC Tau-Ken Samruk and
Tau-Ken Temir LLP as mandatory
respondents in this proceeding.
Interested parties that wish to comment
on this selection, or on the CBP data,
may do so within three business days of
the publication date of this notice.
Commerce will not accept rebuttal
comments regarding the CBP data or
respondent selection.
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b).
Instructions for filing such applications
may be found on Commerce’s website at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo.
Comments must be filed electronically
using ACCESS. An electronically-filed
document must be received
successfully, in its entirety, by ACCESS
no later than 5:00 p.m. on the date noted
above, unless an exception applies.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section
702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version
of the Petition has been provided to the
GOK via ACCESS. To the extent
practicable, Commerce will attempt to
provide a copy of the public version of
the Petition to each exporter named in
the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR
351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of our
initiation, as required by section 702(d)
of the Act.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine,
within 45 days after the date on which
the Petition was filed, whether there is
a reasonable indication that imports of
silicon metal from Kazakhstan are
materially injuring, or threatening
material injury to, a U.S. industry.29 A
negative ITC determination will result
in this investigation being terminated.30
Otherwise, this investigation will
proceed according to the statutory and
regulatory time limits.
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19
CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i) Evidence
29 See
30 See
submitted in response to questionnaires;
(ii) evidence submitted in support of
allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19
CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR
351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence placed on
the record by Commerce; and (v)
evidence other than factual information
described in (i)–(iv). Any party, when
submitting factual information, must
specify under which subsection of 19
CFR 351.301(b) the information is being
submitted 31 and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct
factual information already on the
record, to provide an explanation
identifying the information already on
the record that the factual information
seeks to rebut, clarify, or correct.32 Time
limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR
351.301, which provides specific time
limits based on the type of factual
information being submitted. Interested
parties should review the regulations
prior to submitting factual information
in this investigation.
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of
time limits before the expiration of a
time limit established under 19 CFR
351.301, or as otherwise specified by
Commerce. In general, an extension
request will be considered untimely if it
is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301.
For submissions that are due from
multiple parties simultaneously, an
extension request will be considered
untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET
on the due date. Under certain
circumstances, Commerce may elect to
specify a different time limit by which
extension requests will be considered
untimely for submissions which are due
from multiple parties simultaneously. In
such a case, Commerce will inform
parties in the letter or memorandum
setting forth the deadline (including a
specified time) by which extension
requests must be filed to be considered
timely. An extension request must be
made in a separate, stand-alone
submission; under limited
circumstances Commerce will grant
untimely-filed requests for the extension
of time limits. Parties should review
Extension of Time Limits, 78 FR 57790
(September 20, 2013), available at
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-201309-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting extension requests or factual
information in this investigation.
section 703(a)(2) of the Act.
section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
31 See
32 See
PO 00000
19 CFR 351.301(b).
19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual
information in an AD or CVD
proceeding must certify to the accuracy
and completeness of that information.33
Parties must use the certification
formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).34 Commerce intends to
reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with
the applicable certification
requirements.
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit
applications for disclosure under APO
in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305.
Instructions for filing such applications
may be found on the Commerce website
at https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo.
Parties wishing to participate in this
investigation should ensure that they
meet the requirements of 19 CFR
351.103(d) (e.g., by filing a notice of
appearance). Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary
information, until further notice.35
This notice is issued and published
pursuant to sections 702(c) and 777(i) of
the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: July 20, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all
forms and sizes of silicon metal, including
silicon metal powder. Silicon metal contains
at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99
percent silicon, and less than 4.00 percent
iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor grade
silicon (merchandise containing at least
99.99 percent silicon by actual weight and
classifiable under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) subheading
2804.61.0000) is excluded from the scope of
this investigation.
Silicon metal is currently classifiable
under subheadings 2804.69.1000 and
2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While the
HTSUS numbers are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
33 See
section 782(b) of the Act.
Certification of Factual Information to
Import Administration During Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July
17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also frequently asked
questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_
info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
35 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD
Service Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension
of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July 10, 2020).
34 See
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 144 / Monday, July 27, 2020 / Notices
written description of the scope remains
dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2020–16221 Filed 7–24–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–893–001, A–400–001, A–557–820]
Silicon Metal From Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia:
Initiation of Less-Than-Fair-Value
Investigations
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable July 20, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry
Huang at (202) 482–4047 (Bosnia and
Herzegovina); or Kabir Archuletta at
(202) 482–1766 (Iceland and Malaysia);
AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and
Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
The Petitions
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
On June 30, 2020, the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) received
antidumping duty (AD) petitions
concerning imports of silicon metal
from Bosnia and Herzegovina (Bosnia),
Iceland, and Malaysia filed in proper
form on behalf of the petitioners,1
domestic producers of silicon metal.2
The Petitions were accompanied by a
countervailing duty (CVD) petition
concerning imports of silicon metal
from the Republic of Kazakhstan.3
Between July 6 and 14, 2020,
Commerce requested supplemental
information pertaining to certain aspects
of the Petitions in separate
supplemental questionnaires.4 The
petitioners filed responses to the
1 The petitioners are Globe Specialty Metals, Inc.
and Mississippi Silicon LLC.
2 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Petitions for the
Imposition of Antidumping and Countervailing
Duties: Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iceland, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Malaysia,’’
dated June 30, 2020 (the Petitions).
3 Id.
4 See Commerce’s Letters, ‘‘Petition for the
Imposition of Antidumping Duties on Imports of
Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iceland, and Malaysia and Countervailing Duties on
Imports from Kazakhstan: Supplemental
Questions,’’ dated July 6, 2020; and country-specific
supplemental questionnaires: Bosnia Supplemental,
Iceland Supplemental, Malaysia Supplemental,
dated July 6, 2020; and Iceland Second
Supplemental, Malaysia Second Supplemental,
dated July 14, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:31 Jul 24, 2020
Jkt 250001
45177
supplemental questionnaires between
July 8 and July 15, 2020.5
In accordance with section 732(b) of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the
Act), the petitioners allege that imports
of silicon metal from Bosnia, Iceland,
and Malaysia are being, or are likely to
be, sold in the United States at less than
fair value (LTFV) within the meaning of
section 731 of the Act, and that imports
of such products are materially injuring,
or threatening material injury to, the
domestic silicon metal industry in the
United States. Consistent with section
732(b)(1) of the Act, the Petitions are
accompanied by information reasonably
available to the petitioners supporting
their allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioners
filed the Petitions on behalf of the
domestic industry, because the
petitioners are interested parties, as
defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act.
Commerce also finds that the petitioners
demonstrated sufficient industry
support for the initiation of the
requested AD investigations.6
include factual information,8 all such
factual information should be limited to
public information. To facilitate
preparation of its questionnaires,
Commerce requests that all interested
parties submit such comments by 5:00
p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on August 10,
2020, which is 21calendar days from the
signature date of this notice. Any
rebuttal comments, which may include
factual information, must be filed by
5:00 p.m. ET on August 20, 2020, which
is ten calendar days from the initial
comment deadline.
Commerce requests that any factual
information parties consider relevant to
the scope of the investigations be
submitted during this period. However,
if a party subsequently finds that
additional factual information
pertaining to the scope of the
investigations may be relevant, the party
may contact Commerce and request
permission to submit the additional
information. All such submissions must
be filed on the records of the concurrent
AD and CVD investigations.
Period of Investigation
Filing Requirements
Because the Petitions were filed on
June 30, 2020, the period of
investigation (POI) for the Bosnia,
Iceland, and Malaysia AD investigations
is April 1, 2019 through March 31, 2020,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.204(b)(1).
Scope of the Investigations
The product covered by these
investigations is silicon metal from
Bosnia, Iceland, and Malaysia. For a full
description of the scope of these
investigations, see the appendix to this
notice.
Scope Comments
As discussed in the Preamble to
Commerce’s regulations, we are setting
aside a period for interested parties to
raise issues regarding product coverage
(i.e., scope).7 Commerce will consider
all comments received from interested
parties and, if necessary, will consult
with interested parties prior to the
issuance of the preliminary
determinations. If scope comments
5 See Petitioners’ First Country-Specific
Supplemental Responses, dated July 8, 2020; and
Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia and
Kazakhstan: General Volume Petition Supplement,’’
dated July 8, 2020 (General Issues Supplement); see
also Petitioners’ Second Iceland Supplemental
Response, Second Malaysia Supplemental
Response, dated July 15, 2020.
6 See infra, section on ‘‘Determination of Industry
Support for the Petitions.’’
7 See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties,
Final Rule, 62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997)
(Preamble).
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
All submissions to Commerce must be
filed electronically via Enforcement and
Compliance’s AD and CVD Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS),
unless an exception applies.9 An
electronically-filed document must be
received successfully in its entirety by
the time and date it is due.
Comments on Product Characteristics
Commerce is providing interested
parties an opportunity to comment on
the appropriate physical characteristics
of silicon metal to be reported in
response to Commerce’s AD
questionnaires. This information will be
used to identify the key physical
characteristics of the subject
merchandise in order to report the
relevant costs of production accurately,
as well as to develop appropriate
product-comparison criteria.
Interested parties may provide any
information or comments that they feel
are relevant to the development of an
accurate list of physical characteristics.
Specifically, they may provide
8 See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ‘‘factual
information’’).
9 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System
Name, 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014) for details
of Commerce’s electronic filing requirements,
effective August 5, 2011. Information on help using
ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/
help.aspx and a handbook can be found at https://
access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on
%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
E:\FR\FM\27JYN1.SGM
27JYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 144 (Monday, July 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45173-45177]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-16221]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[C-834-811]
Silicon Metal from the Republic of Kazakhstan: Initiation of
Countervailing Duty Investigation
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
DATES: Applicable July 20, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Justin Neuman; AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-0486.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Petition
On June 30, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) received a
countervailing duty (CVD) petition concerning imports of silicon metal
from the Republic of Kazakhstan (Kazakhstan), filed in proper form on
behalf of the petitioners,\1\ domestic producers of silicon metal.\2\
The Petition was accompanied by antidumping duty (AD) petitions
concerning imports of silicon metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina,
Iceland, and Malaysia.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The petitioners are Globe Specialty Metals, Inc. and
Mississippi Silicon LLC.
\2\ See Petitioners' Letter, ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping and Countervailing Duties: Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Malaysia,''
dated June 30, 2020 (the Petition).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
On July 6 and 7, 2020, Commerce requested supplemental information
pertaining to certain aspects of the Petition in separate supplemental
questionnaires.\3\ The petitioners filed
[[Page 45174]]
responses to the supplemental questionnaires on July 8 and 10, 2020,
respectively.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See Commerce's Letters, ``Petitions for the Imposition of
Antidumping Duties on Imports of Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia and Countervailing Duties on
Imports from Kazakhstan: Supplemental Questions,'' dated July 6,
2020; and ``Petition for the Imposition of Countervailing Duties on
Imports of Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan: Supplemental Questions,''
dated July 7, 2020.
\4\ See Petitioners' Letters, ``Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, and Malaysia and Kazakhstan: General Volume
Petition Supplement,'' dated July 8, 2020 (General Issues
Supplement); and ``Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan: Volume V Petition
Supplement,'' dated July 10, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with section 702(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), the petitioners allege that the Government of
Kazakhstan (GOK) is providing countervailable subsidies, within the
meaning of sections 701 and 771(5) of the Act, to producers of silicon
metal in Kazakhstan, and that imports of such products are materially
injuring, or threatening material injury to, the domestic silicon metal
industry in the United States. Consistent with section 702(b)(1) of the
Act and 19 CFR 351.202(b), for those alleged programs on which we are
initiating a CVD investigation, the petitioners provided reasonably
available information in the Petition to support their allegations.
Commerce finds that the petitioners filed the Petition on behalf of
the domestic industry, because the petitioners are an interested party,
as defined in section 771(9)(C) of the Act. Commerce also finds that
the petitioners demonstrated sufficient industry support necessary for
the initiation of the requested CVD investigation.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See the ``Determination of Industry Support for the
Petition'' section, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Period of Investigation
Because the Petition was filed on June 30, 2020, the period of
investigation is January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019.
Scope of the Investigation
The product covered by this investigation is silicon metal from
Kazakhstan. For a full description of the scope of this investigation,
see the appendix to this notice.
Scope Comments
As discussed in the Preamble to Commerce's regulations, we are
setting aside a period for interested parties to raise issues regarding
product coverage (i.e., scope).\6\ Commerce will consider all comments
received from interested parties and, if necessary, will consult with
interested parties prior to the issuance of the preliminary
determination. If scope comments include factual information,\7\ all
such factual information should be limited to public information.
Commerce requests that all interested parties submit such comments by
5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (ET) on August 10, 2020, which is 21 calendar
days from the signature date of this notice. Any rebuttal comments,
which may include factual information, must be filed by 5:00 p.m. ET on
August 20, 2020, which is 10 calendar days from the initial comment
deadline.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping Duties; Countervailing Duties, Final Rule,
62 FR 27296, 27323 (May 19, 1997) (Preamble).
\7\ See 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) (defining ``factual
information'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce requests that any factual information parties consider
relevant to the scope of the investigation be submitted during this
period. However, if a party subsequently finds that additional factual
information pertaining to the scope of the investigation may be
relevant, the party may contact Commerce and request permission to
submit the additional information. All such submissions must also be
filed on the records of the concurrent AD investigations.
Filing Requirements
All submissions to Commerce must be filed electronically via
Enforcement and Compliance's AD and CVD Centralized Electronic Service
System (ACCESS), unless an exception applies.\8\ An electronically-
filed document must be received successfully in its entirety by the
time and date it is due.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011); see also Enforcement and
Compliance; Change of Electronic Filing System Name, 79 FR 69046
(November 20, 2014), for details of Commerce's electronic filing
requirements, effective August 5, 2011. Information on help using
ACCESS can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help.aspx, and a
handbook can be found at https://access.trade.gov/help/Handbook%20on%20Electronic%20Filling%20Procedures.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Consultations
Pursuant to sections 702(b)(4)(A)(i) and (ii) of the Act, Commerce
notified representatives of the GOK of the receipt of the Petition and
provided them the opportunity for consultations with respect to the
Petition.\9\ Consultations were held with the GOK on July 13, 2020.\10\
The GOK submitted consultation remarks on July 14, 2020.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ See Commerce's Letter, ``Countervailing Duty Petition on
Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan: Invitation for Consultations,'' dated
July 1, 2020.
\10\ See Memorandum, ``Consultations with Officials from the
Government of the Republic of Kazakhstan Regarding the
Countervailing Duty Investigation of Silicon Metal from the Republic
of Kazakhstan,'' dated July 14, 2020.
\11\ See GOK's Letter, ``Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan,'' dated
July 14, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Determination of Industry Support for the Petition
Section 702(b)(1) of the Act requires that a petition be filed on
behalf of the domestic industry. Section 702(c)(4)(A) of the Act
provides that a petition meets this requirement if the domestic
producers or workers who support the petition account for: (i) at least
25 percent of the total production of the domestic like product; and
(ii) more than 50 percent of the production of the domestic like
product produced by that portion of the industry expressing support
for, or opposition to, the petition. Moreover, section 702(c)(4)(D) of
the Act provides that, if the petition does not establish support of
domestic producers or workers accounting for more than 50 percent of
the total production of the domestic like product, Commerce shall: (i)
Poll the industry or rely on other information in order to determine if
there is support for the petition, as required by subparagraph (A); or
(ii) determine industry support using a statistically valid sampling
method to poll the ``industry.''
Section 771(4)(A) of the Act defines the ``industry'' as the
producers as a whole of a domestic like product. Thus, to determine
whether a petition has the requisite industry support, the statute
directs Commerce to look to producers and workers who produce the
domestic like product. The International Trade Commission (ITC), which
is responsible for determining whether ``the domestic industry'' has
been injured, must also determine what constitutes a domestic like
product in order to define the industry. While both Commerce and the
ITC must apply the same statutory definition regarding the domestic
like product,\12\ they do so for different purposes and pursuant to a
separate and distinct authority. In addition, Commerce's determination
is subject to limitations of time and information. Although this may
result in different definitions of the like product, such differences
do not render the decision of either agency contrary to law.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ See section 771(10) of the Act.
\13\ See USEC, Inc. v. United States, 132 F. Supp. 2d 1, 8 (CIT
2001) (citing Algoma Steel Corp., Ltd. v. United States, 688 F.
Supp. 639, 644 (CIT 1988), aff'd 865 F.2d 240 (Fed. Cir. 1989)).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 771(10) of the Act defines the domestic like product as ``a
product which is like, or in the absence of like, most similar in
characteristics and uses with, the article subject to an investigation
under this title.'' Thus, the reference point from which the domestic
like product analysis begins is ``the article subject to an
investigation'' (i.e., the class or kind of merchandise to
[[Page 45175]]
be investigated, which normally will be the scope as defined in the
petition).
With regard to the domestic like product, the petitioners do not
offer a definition of the domestic like product distinct from the scope
of the investigation.\14\ Based on our analysis of the information
submitted on the record, we have determined that silicon metal, as
defined in the scope, constitutes a single domestic like product, and
we have analyzed industry support in terms of that domestic like
product.\15\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ See Volume I of the Petition at 25-28.
\15\ For a discussion of the domestic like product analysis as
applied to these cases, and information regarding industry support,
see the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment II
(``Analysis of Industry Support for the Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Petitions Covering Silicon Metal from Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Iceland, Malaysia, and Kazakhstan'') (Attachment II).
This checklist is dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by,
this notice and is on file electronically via ACCESS.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In determining whether the petitioners have standing under section
702(c)(4)(A) of the Act, we considered the industry support data
contained in the Petition with reference to the domestic like product
as defined in the ``Scope of the Investigation,'' in the appendix to
this notice. To establish industry support, the petitioners provided
their actual 2019 production of the domestic like product.\16\ To
estimate the 2019 production for the entire U.S. silicon metal
industry, the petitioners relied on their own 2019 production data and
estimated production data reported for the non-petitioning producer (DC
Alabama).\17\ We relied on data provided by the petitioners for
purposes of measuring industry support.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Volume I of the Petition at 3-4 and Exhibits I-2 and I-
3; see also General Issues Supplement at 2.
\17\ See Volume I of the Petition at 3-4 and Exhibit I-5; see
also General Issues Supplement at 2.
\18\ See Volume I of the Petition at 3-4 and Exhibit I-5; see
also General Issues Supplement at 2. For further discussion, see
Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation Checklist.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our review of the data provided in the Petition, the General Issues
Supplement, and other information readily available to Commerce
indicates that the petitioners have established industry support for
the Petition.\19\ First, the Petition established support from domestic
producers (or workers) accounting for more than 50 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product and, as such, Commerce is not
required to take further action in order to evaluate industry support
(e.g., polling).\20\ Second, the domestic producers (or workers) have
met the statutory criteria for industry support under section
702(c)(4)(A)(i) of the Act because the domestic producers (or workers)
who support the Petition account for at least 25 percent of the total
production of the domestic like product.\21\ Finally, the domestic
producers (or workers) have met the statutory criteria for industry
support under section 702(c)(4)(A)(ii) of the Act because the domestic
producers (or workers) who support the Petition account for more than
50 percent of the production of the domestic like product produced by
that portion of the industry expressing support for, or opposition to,
the Petition.\22\ Accordingly, Commerce determines that the Petition
was filed on behalf of the domestic industry within the meaning of
section 702(b)(1) of the Act.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ See Volume I of the Petition at 3-4 and Exhibits I-2, I-3,
and I-5; see also General Issues Supplement at 2. For further
discussion, see Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist.
\20\ See Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist; see also section 702(c)(4)(D) of the Act.
\21\ See Attachment II of the Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist.
\22\ Id.
\23\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Injury Test
Because Kazakhstan is a ``Subsidies Agreement Country'' within the
meaning of section 701(b) of the Act, section 701(a)(2) of the Act
applies to this investigation. Accordingly, the ITC must determine
whether imports of the subject merchandise from Kazakhstan materially
injure, or threaten material injury to, a U.S. industry.
Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and Causation
The petitioners allege that imports of the subject merchandise are
benefitting from countervailable subsidies and that such imports are
causing, or threaten to cause, material injury to the U.S. industry
producing the domestic like product. In addition, the petitioners
allege that subject imports exceed the negligibility threshold provided
for under section 771(24)(A) of the Act.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ See Volume I of the Petition at 31 and Exhibit I-31.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioners contend that the industry's injured condition is
illustrated by a significant and increasing volume of subject imports;
declining market share; underselling; price depression and suppression;
lost sales and revenues; declines in capacity, production, shipments,
employment, prices, revenue, and profitability; and declining financial
performance.\25\ We assessed the allegations and supporting evidence
regarding material injury, threat of material injury, causation, and
negligibility, and we have determined that these allegations are
properly supported by adequate evidence and meet the statutory
requirements for initiation.\26\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ See Volume I of the Petition at 41-68 and Exhibits I-1, I-5
through I-7, I-10, I-13, I-15, I-16, I-18, I-20, I-23, I-24, I-32,
I-34, and I-37 through I-59.
\26\ See Kazakhstan CVD Initiation Checklist at Attachment III
(``Analysis of Allegations and Evidence of Material Injury and
Causation for the Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Petitions
Covering Silicon Metal from Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iceland,
Kazakhstan, and Malaysia'') (Attachment III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initiation of CVD Investigation
Based upon an examination of the Petition and supplemental
responses, we find that the Petition meets the requirements of section
702 of the Act. Therefore, we are initiating a CVD investigation to
determine whether imports of silicon metal from Kazakhstan benefit from
countervailable subsidies conferred by the GOK.
Based on our review of the Petition, we find that there is
sufficient information to initiate a CVD investigation on all eight of
the alleged programs. For a full discussion of the basis for our
decision to initiate on each program, see Kazakhstan CVD Initiation
Checklist. A public version of the initiation checklist for this
investigation is available on ACCESS. In accordance with section
703(b)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.205(b)(1), unless postponed, we
will make our preliminary determination no later than 65 days after the
date of this initiation.
Respondent Selection
In the Petition, the petitioners named two companies as producers
of silicon metal in Kazakhstan, as well as two additional companies as
potential exporters.\27\ On July 10, 2020, Commerce released U.S.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports of silicon
metal from Kazakhstan under the appropriate Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States numbers listed in the appendix to this notice
under Administrative Protective Order (APO) to all parties with access
to information protected by APO and indicated that interested parties
wishing to comment on the CBP data must do so within three business
days of the publication date of the notice of initiation of this
investigation.\28\ However, based on the
[[Page 45176]]
CBP data, Commerce determines that there was not a large number of
producers/exporters of silicon metal during the POI. Commerce therefore
intends to follow its standard practice in CVD investigations and
calculate company-specific subsidy rates for each publicly-identifiable
company included in the CBP data. Therefore, we are selecting JSC NMC
Tau-Ken Samruk and Tau-Ken Temir LLP as mandatory respondents in this
proceeding. Interested parties that wish to comment on this selection,
or on the CBP data, may do so within three business days of the
publication date of this notice. Commerce will not accept rebuttal
comments regarding the CBP data or respondent selection.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ See Volume I of the Petition at 2.
\28\ See Memorandum, ``Petition for the Imposition of
Countervailing Duties on Imports of Silicon Metal from Kazakhstan:
Release of Entry Data,'' dated July 10, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(b). Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on Commerce's website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo. Comments must be filed electronically using
ACCESS. An electronically-filed document must be received successfully,
in its entirety, by ACCESS no later than 5:00 p.m. on the date noted
above, unless an exception applies.
Distribution of Copies of the Petition
In accordance with section 702(b)(4)(A)(i) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.202(f), a copy of the public version of the Petition has been
provided to the GOK via ACCESS. To the extent practicable, Commerce
will attempt to provide a copy of the public version of the Petition to
each exporter named in the Petition, as provided under 19 CFR
351.203(c)(2).
ITC Notification
Commerce will notify the ITC of our initiation, as required by
section 702(d) of the Act.
Preliminary Determination by the ITC
The ITC will preliminarily determine, within 45 days after the date
on which the Petition was filed, whether there is a reasonable
indication that imports of silicon metal from Kazakhstan are materially
injuring, or threatening material injury to, a U.S. industry.\29\ A
negative ITC determination will result in this investigation being
terminated.\30\ Otherwise, this investigation will proceed according to
the statutory and regulatory time limits.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ See section 703(a)(2) of the Act.
\30\ See section 703(a)(1) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Submission of Factual Information
Factual information is defined in 19 CFR 351.102(b)(21) as: (i)
Evidence submitted in response to questionnaires; (ii) evidence
submitted in support of allegations; (iii) publicly available
information to value factors under 19 CFR 351.408(c) or to measure the
adequacy of remuneration under 19 CFR 351.511(a)(2); (iv) evidence
placed on the record by Commerce; and (v) evidence other than factual
information described in (i)-(iv). Any party, when submitting factual
information, must specify under which subsection of 19 CFR 351.301(b)
the information is being submitted \31\ and, if the information is
submitted to rebut, clarify, or correct factual information already on
the record, to provide an explanation identifying the information
already on the record that the factual information seeks to rebut,
clarify, or correct.\32\ Time limits for the submission of factual
information are addressed in 19 CFR 351.301, which provides specific
time limits based on the type of factual information being submitted.
Interested parties should review the regulations prior to submitting
factual information in this investigation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b).
\32\ See 19 CFR 351.301(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Extensions of Time Limits
Parties may request an extension of time limits before the
expiration of a time limit established under 19 CFR 351.301, or as
otherwise specified by Commerce. In general, an extension request will
be considered untimely if it is filed after the expiration of the time
limit established under 19 CFR 351.301. For submissions that are due
from multiple parties simultaneously, an extension request will be
considered untimely if it is filed after 10:00 a.m. ET on the due date.
Under certain circumstances, Commerce may elect to specify a different
time limit by which extension requests will be considered untimely for
submissions which are due from multiple parties simultaneously. In such
a case, Commerce will inform parties in the letter or memorandum
setting forth the deadline (including a specified time) by which
extension requests must be filed to be considered timely. An extension
request must be made in a separate, stand-alone submission; under
limited circumstances Commerce will grant untimely-filed requests for
the extension of time limits. Parties should review Extension of Time
Limits, 78 FR 57790 (September 20, 2013), available at https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2013-09-20/html/2013-22853.htm, prior to
submitting extension requests or factual information in this
investigation.
Certification Requirements
Any party submitting factual information in an AD or CVD proceeding
must certify to the accuracy and completeness of that information.\33\
Parties must use the certification formats provided in 19 CFR
351.303(g).\34\ Commerce intends to reject factual submissions if the
submitting party does not comply with the applicable certification
requirements.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ See section 782(b) of the Act.
\34\ See Certification of Factual Information to Import
Administration During Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings, 78 FR 42678 (July 17, 2013) (Final Rule); see also
frequently asked questions regarding the Final Rule, available at
https://enforcement.trade.gov/tlei/notices/factual_info_final_rule_FAQ_07172013.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notification to Interested Parties
Interested parties must submit applications for disclosure under
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Instructions for filing such
applications may be found on the Commerce website at https://enforcement.trade.gov/apo. Parties wishing to participate in this
investigation should ensure that they meet the requirements of 19 CFR
351.103(d) (e.g., by filing a notice of appearance). Note that Commerce
has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for serving
documents containing business proprietary information, until further
notice.\35\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements
Due to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 41363 (July
10, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This notice is issued and published pursuant to sections 702(c) and
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.203(c).
Dated: July 20, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
Scope of the Investigation
The scope of this investigation covers all forms and sizes of
silicon metal, including silicon metal powder. Silicon metal
contains at least 85.00 percent but less than 99.99 percent silicon,
and less than 4.00 percent iron, by actual weight. Semiconductor
grade silicon (merchandise containing at least 99.99 percent silicon
by actual weight and classifiable under Harmonized Tariff Schedule
of the United States (HTSUS) subheading 2804.61.0000) is
excluded from the scope of this investigation.
Silicon metal is currently classifiable under subheadings
2804.69.1000 and 2804.69.5000 of the HTSUS. While the HTSUS numbers
are provided for convenience and customs purposes, the
[[Page 45177]]
written description of the scope remains dispositive.
[FR Doc. 2020-16221 Filed 7-24-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
