Applications for New Awards; Indian Education Discretionary Grants Programs-Native American Language Program, 42370-42376 [2020-15222]
Download as PDF
42370
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
applications, and the instructions for
submitting applications.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document,
the NIA, and a copy of the application
package in an accessible format (e.g.,
braille, large print, audiotape, or
compact disc) on request to the program
contact person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Mark Schultz,
Commissioner, Rehabilitation Services
Administration, delegated the authority to
perform the functions and duties of the
Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special
Education and Rehabilitative Services.
[FR Doc. 2020–15202 Filed 7–9–20; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0112]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Comment Request;
Evaluation of the Innovative
Assessment Demonstration Authority
Pilot Program-Preliminary Activities
Institute for Education Sciences
(IES), Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing a new information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before
September 14, 2020.
ADDRESSES: To access and review all the
documents related to the information
collection listed in this notice, please
use https://www.regulations.gov by
searching the Docket ID number ED–
2020–SCC–0112. Comments submitted
in response to this notice should be
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
submitted electronically through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal at https://
www.regulations.gov by selecting the
Docket ID number or via postal mail,
commercial delivery, or hand delivery.
If the regulations.gov site is not
available to the public for any reason,
ED will temporarily accept comments at
ICDocketMgr@ed.gov. Please include the
docket ID number and the title of the
information collection request when
requesting documents or submitting
comments. Please note that comments
submitted by fax or email and those
submitted after the comment period will
not be accepted. Written requests for
information or comments submitted by
postal mail or delivery should be
addressed to the Director of the Strategic
Collections and Clearance Governance
and Strategy Division, U.S. Department
of Education, 400 Maryland Ave. SW,
LBJ, Room 6W208B, Washington, DC
20202–8240.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact Thomas Wei,
(646) 428–3892.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: Evaluation of the
Innovative Assessment Demonstration
Authority Pilot Program-Preliminary
Activities.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
OMB Control Number: 1850–NEW.
Type of Review: New information
collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local and Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 60.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 120.
Abstract: This study will meet the
Congressional mandate to evaluate the
Innovative Assessment Demonstration
Authority Pilot Program (IADA). The
program (Title I, Section 1204 of the
Every Student Succeeds Act, or ESSA)
allows the U.S. Department of
Education to exempt a handful of states
from certain testing requirements if they
agree to pilot new types of assessments.
The study will produce a ‘‘Progress
Report’’ and a ‘‘Best Practices Report,’’
as mandated by Congress. The Progress
Report will be based on existing
documents from pilot states. The
subsequent Best Practices Report will
add, via surveys, the perspectives of
district leaders, principals, and teachers
on the development, implementation,
and outcomes of IADA assessments.
These reports will help the Department
appropriately target its technical
assistance to tackle the largest barriers
to adequate progress in pilot states, and
provide a valuable guide for other states
that may want to develop a new
assessment in the future.
Dated: July 9, 2020.
Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–15130 Filed 7–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Indian
Education Discretionary Grants
Programs—Native American Language
Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
is issuing a notice inviting applications
for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020
for Indian Education Discretionary
Grants Programs—Native American
Language (NAL@ED) program, Catalog
of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number 84.415B.
DATES: Applications Available: July 14,
2020.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
July 29, 2020.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: July
21, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: August 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tanya Tullos, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 3W234, Washington, DC 20202–
6335. Telephone: (202) 453–6037.
Email: NAL@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB
control number 1810–0731.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purposes of
this program are to (1) support schools
that use Native American and Alaska
Native languages as the primary
language of instruction; (2) maintain,
protect, and promote the rights and
freedom of Native Americans and
Alaska Natives to use, practice,
maintain, and revitalize their languages,
as envisioned in the Native American
Languages Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C. 2901,
et seq.); and (3) support the Nation’s
First Peoples’ efforts to maintain and
revitalize their languages and cultures,
and to improve educational
opportunities and student outcomes
within Native American and Alaska
Native communities.
Background: Through this
competition, the Department intends to
broaden the impact of the NAL@ED
program. The Department plans to
accomplish this in three ways. First,
under this competition, assuming there
are enough high-quality applications,
the Department will fund only one highquality project per Native language,
consistent with the statutory
requirement that the Department ensure
that a diversity of languages is
represented, to the maximum extent
feasible. Second, Absolute Priority 1
solicits applications supporting new
Native Language instructional programs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Third, in keeping with the congressional
emphasis in the Explanatory Statement
accompanying the Department of
Education Appropriations Act, 2020,
regarding the importance of
geographical diversity in grantees under
this program, Program Requirement 3
ensures that, in any competition year,
the Department will not exclusively
fund applicants from a single State,
provided there are enough high-quality
applications. Together, these
approaches will broaden the impact of
the program by funding projects
supporting a variety of Native
languages.
Priorities: This competition includes
two absolute priorities and two
competitive preference priorities. In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(ii),
these priorities are from the notice of
final priorities, requirements,
definitions, and selection criteria for
this program published elsewhere in
this issue of the Federal Register (NFP).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2020 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition,
these priorities are absolute priorities.
Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(3), we consider
only applications that meet either one of
these priorities. Applicants are eligible
under either Absolute Priority 1 or 2,
not both.
Note: The Secretary intends to create two
funding slates for NAL@ED applications—
one for applications that meet Absolute
Priority 1 and a separate slate for
applications that meet Absolute Priority 2. As
a result, the Secretary may fund applications
out of the overall rank order. The Secretary
anticipates awarding approximately the same
amount of grants funds to applicants that
meet Absolute Priority 1 as to those that meet
Absolute Priority 2, but the Secretary is not
bound by these estimates. Applicants must
clearly identify the specific absolute priority
that the proposed project addresses.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Develop and
Maintain New Native American
Language Programs
To meet this priority, an applicant
must propose to develop and maintain
a Native American language
instructional program that—
(a) Will support Native American
language education and development
for Native American students, as well as
provide professional development for
teachers and, as appropriate, staff and
administrators, to strengthen the overall
language and academic goals of the
school or schools that will be served by
the project;
(b) Will take place in a school; and
(c) Does not augment or replace a
program of identical scope that was
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42371
active within the last three years at the
school(s) to be served.
Absolute Priority 2: Expand and
Improve Existing Native American
Language Programs
To meet this priority, an applicant
must propose to improve and expand a
Native American language instructional
program that—
(a) Will improve and expand Native
American language education and
development for Native American
students, as well as provide professional
development for teachers and, as
appropriate, staff and administrators, to
strengthen the overall language and
academic goals of the school or schools
that will be served by the project;
(b) Will continue to take place in a
school; and
(c) Within the past three years has
been offered at the school(s) to be
served.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2020 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to
an additional seven points to an
application, depending on how well an
application meets Competitive
Preference Priority 1, and we award an
additional five points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 2. The maximum number of
competitive preference priority points is
12.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1:
Support Project Sustainability With
Title VI Indian Education Formula
Grant Funds (up to 7 Points)
To meet this priority, an applicant or
a partner must receive, or be eligible to
receive, a formula grant under title VI of
the Elementary and Secondary
Education Act of 1965, as amended
(ESEA), and must commit to use all or
part of that formula grant to help sustain
this project after the conclusion of the
grant period. To meet this priority, an
applicant must include in its
application—
(a) A statement that indicates the
school year in which the entity will
begin using title VI formula grant funds
to help support this project;
(b) The percentage of the title VI grant
that will be used for the project, which
must be at least—
(i) 20 percent of the applicant’s title
VI formula grant (3 point);
(ii) 40 percent of the applicant’s title
VI formula grant (4 points);
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
42372
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
(iii) 60 percent of the applicant’s title
VI formula grant (5 points);
(iv) 80 percent of the applicant’s title
VI formula grant (6 points); or
(v) 100 percent of the applicant’s title
VI formula grant (7 points); and
(c) The timeline for obtaining parent
committee input and approval of this
action, if necessary.
Competitive Preference Priority 2:
Preference for Indian Applicants (0 or 5
Points)
To meet this priority, an application
must be submitted by an Indian Tribe,
Indian organization, Bureau of Indian
Education (BIE)-funded school, or Tribal
College or University (TCU) that is
eligible to participate in the NAL@ED
program. A consortium of eligible
entities that meets the requirements of
34 CFR 75.127 through 75.129 and
includes an Indian Tribe, Indian
organization, BIE-funded school, or TCU
will also be considered eligible to meet
this priority. In order to be considered
a consortium application, the
application must include the
consortium agreement, signed by all
parties.
Application Requirements: These
application requirements are from
section 6133(c) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7453) and from the NFP. For FY 2020
and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition,
applicants must meet the following
application requirements.
Each application for funds must
include the following:
(1) General Requirements. The
following requirements apply to all
applicants submitted under this
competition. An applicant must include
in its application—
(a) A completed information form that
includes:
(i) Instructional language. The name
of the Native American or Alaska Native
language to be used for instruction at
the school(s) supported by the eligible
entity.
(ii) Students to be served. The number
of students to be served by the project
and the grade level(s) of targeted
students in the proposed project.
(iii) Instructional hours. The number
of hours of instruction per week in and
through one or more Native American or
Alaska Native languages currently being
provided to targeted students at such
school(s), if any.
(iv) Pre- and post-assessments.
Whether a pre- and post-assessment of
Native American language proficiency is
available and, if not, the percentage of
grant funds that will be used for
developing such assessment.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
(v) Program description. A description
of how the eligible entity will support
Native American language education
and development, and provide
professional development for staff, in
order to strengthen the overall language
and academic goals of the school(s) that
will be served by the project; ensure the
implementation of rigorous academic
content that prepares all students for
college and career; and ensure that
students’ progress toward meeting highlevel fluency goals in the Native
American language.
(vi) Organizational information. For
each school included in the project,
information regarding the school’s
organizational governance or
affiliations, specifically information
about the school’s governing entity
(such as a local educational agency
(LEA), Tribal educational agency or
department, charter organization,
private organization, or other governing
entity); the school’s accreditation status;
any partnerships with institutions of
higher education; and any indigenous
language schooling and research
cooperatives.
(b) An assurance that for each school
to be included in the project—
(i) The school is engaged in meeting
State or Tribally designated long-term
goals for students, as may be required by
applicable Federal, State, or Tribal law;
(ii) The school provides assessments
of students using the Native American
or Alaska Native language of
instruction, where possible;
(iii) The qualifications of all
instructional and leadership personnel
at such school are sufficient to deliver
high-quality education through the
Native American or Alaska Native
language used in the school; and
(iv) The school will collect and report
to the public data relative to student
achievement and, if appropriate, rates of
high school graduation, career
readiness, and enrollment in
postsecondary education or workforce
development programs, of students who
are enrolled in the school’s programs.
(2) Memorandum of Agreement. Any
applicant that proposes to work with a
partner to carry out the proposed project
must include a signed and dated
memorandum of agreement that
describes the roles and responsibilities
of each partner to participate in the
grant, including—
(i) A description of how each partner
will implement the project according to
the timelines described in the grant
application;
(ii) The roles and responsibilities of
each partner related to ensuring the data
necessary to report on the Government
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Performance and Results Act (GPRA)
indicators; and
(iii) The roles and responsibilities of
each partner related to ensuring that
Native American language instructors
can be recruited, retained, and trained,
as appropriate, in a timely manner.
This memorandum of agreement must
be signed no more than four months
prior to the application deadline (i.e.,
the agreement must be signed within the
four months prior to the application
deadline).
(3) Applicant Engagement with Indian
Tribes and Tribal Organizations. All
non-Tribal applicants must engage with
appropriate officials from Tribe(s)
located in the area served by the project,
or with a local Tribal organization, prior
to submission of an application. The
engagement must provide for the
opportunity for officials from Tribes or
Tribal organizations to meaningfully
and substantively contribute to the
application. Non-Tribal applicants must
submit evidence of either Tribal
engagement or a letter of support from
one or more Tribes or Tribal
organizations. This evidence can be part
of the memorandum of agreement
required by Application Requirement 2
or can be uploaded as a separate
attachment.
Note: If an applicant is an affected LEA
that is subject to ESEA section 8538, then the
LEA is required to consult with appropriate
officials from Tribe(s) or Tribal organizations
approved by the Tribes located in the area
served by the LEA prior to its submission of
an application, on the contents of the
application as required under ESEA section
8538. Affected LEAs are those that have 50
percent or more of their student enrollment
made up of Native American students; or
received an Indian education formula grant
under title VI of the ESEA in the previous
fiscal year that exceeds $40,000. (ESEA sec.
8538)
(4) Certification. An applicant that is
an LEA (including a public charter
school that is an LEA under State law),
a school operated by the BIE, or a
nontribal for-profit or nonprofit
organization must submit a certification
from an entity described in application
requirement (4)(a), containing the
assurances described in application
requirement (4)(b).
(a) The certification must be from one
of the following entities, on whose land
the school or program is located, or that
is an entity served by the school, or
whose members (as defined by that
entity) are served by the school:
(i) A federally recognized Indian Tribe
or Tribal organization.
(ii) A TCU.
(iii) An Alaska Native Regional
Corporation or an Alaska Native
nonprofit organization.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
(iv) A Native Hawaiian organization.
(b) The certification must state that—
(i) The school or applicant
organization has the capacity to provide
education primarily through a Native
American or an Alaska Native language;
and
(ii) There are sufficient speakers of the
target language at the school or available
to be hired by the school or applicant
organization.
Program Requirements: For FY 2020
and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition,
grantees must adhere to the following
program requirements:
(1) Native American Language
Proficiency Assessment. Grantees must
administer pre- and post-assessments of
Native American language proficiency
to participating students. This Native
American language assessment may be
any relevant tool that measures student
Native American language proficiency,
such as oral, written or project-based
assessments, and formative or
summative assessments.
(2) Diversity of Languages. To ensure
a diversity of languages as required by
statute, the Department will not fund
more than one project in any
competition year that proposes to use
the same Native American language,
assuming there are enough high-quality
applications. In the event of a lack of
high-quality applications in one
competition year, the Department may
choose to fund more than one project
with the same Native American
language.
(3) Geographic Distribution. To ensure
geographic diversity, assuming there are
enough high-quality applications, the
Department will not exclusively fund
projects that all propose to serve
students in the same State in any
competition year. In the event of a lack
of high-quality applications in one
competition year, the Department may
choose to fund only applications that
propose to provide services in one State.
(4) ISDEAA Statutory Hiring
Preference:
(a) Awards that are primarily for the
benefit of Indians are subject to the
provisions of section 7(b) of the Indian
Self-Determination and Education
Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93–638). That
section requires that, to the greatest
extent feasible, a grantee—
(1) Give to Indians preferences and
opportunities for training and
employment in connection with the
administration of the grant; and
(2) Give to Indian organizations and to
Indian-owned economic enterprises, as
defined in section 3 of the Indian
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
Financing Act of 1974 (25 U.S.C.
1452(e)), preference in the award of
contracts in connection with the
administration of the grant.
(b) For purposes of this section, an
Indian is a member of any federally
recognized Indian Tribe.
Definitions: The definitions of ‘‘Indian
organization (or Tribal organization)’’
and ‘‘Tribe’’ are from the NFP. The
definitions of ‘‘Native American,’’
‘‘Native American language,’’ and
‘‘Tribal college or university’’ are from
the ESEA.
Indian organization (or Tribal
organization) means an organization
that—
(1) Is legally established—
(i) By Tribal or inter-Tribal charter or
in accordance with State or Tribal law;
and
(ii) With appropriate constitution,
bylaws, or articles of incorporation;
(2) Includes in its purposes the
promotion of the education of Indians;
(3) Is controlled by a governing board,
the majority of which is Indian;
(4) If located on an Indian reservation,
operates with the sanction of or by
charter from the governing body of that
reservation;
(5) Is neither an organization or
subdivision of, nor under the direct
control of, any institution of higher
education or TCU; and
(6) Is not an agency of State or local
government.
Native American means:
(1) ‘‘Indian’’ as defined in section
6151(3) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7491(3)),
which includes individuals who are
Alaska Natives and members of
federally recognized or State recognized
Tribes;
(2) Native Hawaiian; or
(3) Native American Pacific Islander.
(ESEA secs. 6151(3) and 8101(34))
Native American language means the
historical, traditional languages spoken
by Native Americans. (ESEA sec.
8101(34))
Tribal college or university means an
institution that—
(1) Qualifies for funding under the
Tribally Controlled Colleges and
Universities Assistance Act of 1978 (25
U.S.C. 1801, et seq.) or the Navajo
Community College Act (25 U.S.C. 640a
note); or
(2) Is cited in section 532 of the
Equity in Educational Land-Grant Status
Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note). (ESEA
sec. 6133 and section 316 of the Higher
Education Act of 1965, as amended)
Tribe means either a federally
recognized Tribe or a State-recognized
Tribe.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7453.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42373
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97, 98,
and 99. (b) The Office of Management
and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
The NFP.
Note: The open licensing requirement in 2
CFR 3474.20 does not apply to this program.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian Tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86
apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$1,546,986.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in FY
2021 from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$300,000–$400,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$350,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. The following entities, either alone
or in a consortium, that have a plan to
develop and maintain, or to improve
and expand, programs that support the
entity’s use of a Native American or
Alaska Native language as the primary
language of instruction in one or more
elementary or secondary schools (or
both) are eligible under this program:
(a) An Indian Tribe.
(b) A Tribal College or University
(TCU).
(c) A Tribal education agency.
(d) An LEA, including a public
charter school that is an LEA under
State law.
(e) A school operated by the Bureau
of Indian Education (BIE).
(f) An Alaska Native Regional
Corporation (as described in section 3(g)
of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement
Act (43 U.S.C. 1602(g))).
(g) A private, Tribal, or Alaska Native
nonprofit organization.
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
42374
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
(h) A non-Tribal for-profit
organization.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
3. Other: Projects funded under this
competition should budget for a twoday Project Directors’ meeting in
Washington, DC during each year of the
project period.
4. Funding Restrictions: Under ESEA
section 6133(g), no more than five
percent of funds awarded for a grant
under this program may be used for
administrative purposes, and for grants
made using FY 2020 funds this
administrative cost cap applies only to
direct administrative costs, not indirect
costs.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an
application.
2. Submission of Proprietary
Information: Given the types of projects
that may be proposed in applications for
this competition, your application may
include business information that you
consider proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we
define ‘‘business information’’ and
describe the process we use in
determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus,
protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because we plan to make successful
applications available to the public by
posting them on our website, you may
wish to request confidentiality of
business information.
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
believe is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. However, under 34 CFR
79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
review in order to make awards by the
end of FY 2020.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative is where you, the
applicant, address the selection criteria
that reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the application narrative to no
more than 30 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to the cover sheet; the budget
section, including the narrative budget
justification; the assurances and
certifications; or the one-page abstract,
the resumes, the bibliography, the
letter(s) of support, or the signed
consortium agreement. However, the
recommended page limit does apply to
all of the application narrative. An
application will not be disqualified if it
exceeds the recommended page limit.
5. Notice of Intent to Apply: The
Department will be able to review grant
applications more efficiently if we know
the approximate number of applicants
that intend to apply. Therefore, we
strongly encourage each potential
applicant to notify us of their intent to
submit an application. To do so, please
email the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT with the subject line ‘‘Intent to
Apply,’’ and include the applicant’s
name and a contact person’s name and
email address. Applicants that do not
submit a notice of intent to apply may
still apply for funding; applicants that
do submit a notice of intent to apply are
not bound to apply or bound by the
information provided.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria. The selection
criteria are from the NFP and 34 CFR
75.210. The source of each selection
criterion, and the maximum possible
score for addressing each criterion and
subcriterion, is included in parentheses.
The maximum possible score for
addressing all of the criteria in this
section is 100 points.
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In evaluating an application, the
Secretary considers the following
criteria:
(a) Quality of the project design (27
points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable. (9 points) (34
CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(2) The extent to which the project
design will ensure that students’
progress toward grade-level and
developmentally appropriate fluency in
the Native American language. (6
points) (NFP)
(3) The extent to which the proposed
project will incorporate parent
engagement and participation in Native
American language instruction. (6
points) (NFP)
(4) The quality of the approach to
developing and administering pre- and
post-assessments of student Native
American language proficiency,
including consultation with individuals
with assessment expertise, as needed. (6
points) (NFP)
(b) Quality of project services (28
points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project. In determining the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(1) The quality and sufficiency of
strategies for ensuring equal access and
treatment for eligible project
participants who are members of groups
that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or
disability. (1 point) (34 CFR
75.210(d)(2))
(2) The quality of the plan for
supporting grade-level and
developmentally appropriate instruction
in a Native American language by
providing instruction of or through the
Native American language. (10 points)
(NFP)
(3) The extent to which the project
will provide professional development
for teachers and, as appropriate, staff
and administrators to strengthen the
overall language proficiency and
academic goals of the school(s) that will
be served by the project, including
cultural competence training for all staff
in the school(s). (10 points) (NFP)
(4) The extent to which the services
to be provided by the proposed project
involve the collaboration of appropriate
partners for maximizing the
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
effectiveness of project services. (4
points) (34 CFR 75.210(d)(3)(ix))
(5) The extent to which the percentage
of the school day that instruction will be
provided in the Native American
language is ambitious and is reasonable
for the grade level and population
served. (3 points) (NFP)
(c) Quality of project personnel (20
points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the personnel who will carry out the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of project personnel, the
Secretary considers:
(1) The extent to which the applicant
encourages applications for employment
from persons who are members of
groups that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or
disability. (1 point) (34 CFR
75.210(e)(2))
(2) The extent to which teachers of the
Native American language who are
identified as staff for this project have
teaching experience and are fluent in
the Native American language. (13
points) (NFP)
(3) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel. (6 points) (34 CFR
75.210(e)(3)(ii))
(d) Adequacy of resources (11 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy
of resources for the proposed project. In
determining the adequacy of resources
for the proposed project, the Secretary
considers:
(1) The extent to which the costs are
reasonable in relation to the objectives,
design, and potential significance of the
proposed project. (7 points) (34 CFR
75.210(f)(2)(iv))
(2) The potential for continued
support of the project after Federal
funding ends, including, as appropriate,
the demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support. (4
points) (34 CFR 75.210(f)(2)(vi))
(e) Quality of the management plan
(14 points). The Secretary considers the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the
quality of the management plan for the
proposed project, the Secretary
considers:
(1) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks. (8 points) (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(i))
(2) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
principal investigator and other key
project personnel are appropriate and
adequate to meet the objectives of the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
proposed project. (6 points) (34 CFR
75.210(g)(2)(iv))
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this program, the Department conducts
a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the
Secretary may impose specific
conditions and, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management (SAM). You may
review and comment on any
information about yourself that a
Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
42375
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we will notify
you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
4. Performance Measures: The
Department has established the
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
42376
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 135 / Tuesday, July 14, 2020 / Notices
following GPRA performance measures
for the NAL@ED program:
(a) The number and percentage of
students who attain proficiency in a
Native Language as determined by each
grantee through pre- and postassessments of Native language
proficiency;
(b) The number and percentage of
participating students who make
progress in learning a Native language,
as determined by each grantee, through
pre- and post-assessments of Native
language proficiency;
(c) The number and percentage of
participating students who show an
improvement in academic outcomes, as
measured by academic assessments or
other indicators; and
(d) The difference between the
average daily attendance of participating
students and the average daily
attendance of all students in the
comparison group (e.g., school, LEA,
Tribe or other).
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicators of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise
an applicant for a grant under this
program to carefully consider these
measures in conceptualizing the
approach to, and evaluation for, its
proposed project. Each grantee will be
required to provide, in its annual
performance and final reports, data
about its progress in meeting these
measures.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:58 Jul 13, 2020
Jkt 250001
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020–15222 Filed 7–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
[FE Docket No. 12–32–LNG]
Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P.; Final
Opinion and Order Granting LongTerm Authorization To Export
Liquefied Natural Gas to Non-Free
Trade Agreement Nations
Office of Fossil Energy,
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Record of decision.
AGENCY:
The Office of Fossil Energy
(FE) of the Department of Energy (DOE)
gives notice of a Record of Decision
(ROD) published under the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) and implementing regulations.
This ROD supports DOE/FE’s decision
in DOE/FE Order No. 3413–A, an
opinion and order authorizing Jordan
Cove Energy Project L.P. to export
domestically-produced liquefied natural
gas (LNG) to non-free trade agreement
countries under section 3(a) of the
Natural Gas Act (NGA).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Lavoie, U.S. Department of Energy
(FE–34), Office of Regulation, Analysis,
and Engagement, Office of Fossil
Energy, Forrestal Building, Room 3E–
042, 1000 Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586–2459,
Brian.Lavoie@hq.doe.gov.
Irene V. Nemesio, U.S. Department of
Energy (GC–76), Office of the Assistant
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
General Counsel for Electricity and
Fossil Energy, Forrestal Building, 1000
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20585, (202) 586–8606,
Irene.Nemesio@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On July 6,
2020, DOE/FE issued Order No. 3413–
A to Jordan Cove Energy Project L.P.
(Jordan Cove) under NGA section 3(a),
15 U.S.C. 717b(a). This Order authorizes
Jordan Cove to export domesticallyproduced LNG to any country with
which the United States has not entered
into a free trade agreement (FTA)
requiring national treatment for trade in
natural gas, and with which trade is not
prohibited by U.S. law or policy (nonFTA countries). Jordan Cove is
authorized to export LNG in a volume
equivalent to 395 billion cubic feet (Bcf)
per year of natural gas (1.08 Bcf/day)
from the proposed Jordan Cove LNG
Terminal (Terminal) to be located in
unincorporated Coos County, Oregon.
DOE/FE participated as a cooperating
agency with the Federal Energy
Regulatory Commission in preparing an
environmental impact statement (EIS)
analyzing the potential environmental
impacts of the proposed Terminal (along
with its associated pipeline) that would
be used to support the export
authorization sought from DOE/FE. DOE
adopted the EIS and prepared the ROD,
which is attached as an appendix to the
Order. The ROD can be found here:
https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/
2020/07/f76/3143a.pdf.
Signed in Washington, DC, on July 8, 2020.
Amy Sweeney,
Director, Office of Regulation, Analysis, and
Engagement, Office of Oil and Natural Gas.
[FR Doc. 2020–15094 Filed 7–13–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG20–206–000.
Applicants: Odom Solar, LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Odom Solar, LLC.
Filed Date: 7/2/20.
Accession Number: 20200702–5419.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 7/23/20.
Docket Numbers: EG20–207–000.
Applicants: Sugar Creek Wind One
LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
E:\FR\FM\14JYN1.SGM
14JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 135 (Tuesday, July 14, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 42370-42376]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-15222]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Indian Education Discretionary
Grants Programs--Native American Language Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for Indian
Education Discretionary Grants Programs--Native American Language
([email protected]) program, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) number
84.415B.
DATES: Applications Available: July 14, 2020.
[[Page 42371]]
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: July 29, 2020.
Date of Pre-Application Meeting: July 21, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: August 28, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tanya Tullos, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 3W234, Washington, DC 20202-
6335. Telephone: (202) 453-6037. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB control number 1810-0731.
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The purposes of this program are to (1) support
schools that use Native American and Alaska Native languages as the
primary language of instruction; (2) maintain, protect, and promote the
rights and freedom of Native Americans and Alaska Natives to use,
practice, maintain, and revitalize their languages, as envisioned in
the Native American Languages Act of 1990 (25 U.S.C. 2901, et seq.);
and (3) support the Nation's First Peoples' efforts to maintain and
revitalize their languages and cultures, and to improve educational
opportunities and student outcomes within Native American and Alaska
Native communities.
Background: Through this competition, the Department intends to
broaden the impact of the [email protected] program. The Department plans to
accomplish this in three ways. First, under this competition, assuming
there are enough high-quality applications, the Department will fund
only one high-quality project per Native language, consistent with the
statutory requirement that the Department ensure that a diversity of
languages is represented, to the maximum extent feasible. Second,
Absolute Priority 1 solicits applications supporting new Native
Language instructional programs. Third, in keeping with the
congressional emphasis in the Explanatory Statement accompanying the
Department of Education Appropriations Act, 2020, regarding the
importance of geographical diversity in grantees under this program,
Program Requirement 3 ensures that, in any competition year, the
Department will not exclusively fund applicants from a single State,
provided there are enough high-quality applications. Together, these
approaches will broaden the impact of the program by funding projects
supporting a variety of Native languages.
Priorities: This competition includes two absolute priorities and
two competitive preference priorities. In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(ii), these priorities are from the notice of final
priorities, requirements, definitions, and selection criteria for this
program published elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register
(NFP).
Absolute Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are absolute priorities. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3), we consider only applications that meet either one of
these priorities. Applicants are eligible under either Absolute
Priority 1 or 2, not both.
Note: The Secretary intends to create two funding slates for
[email protected] applications--one for applications that meet Absolute
Priority 1 and a separate slate for applications that meet Absolute
Priority 2. As a result, the Secretary may fund applications out of
the overall rank order. The Secretary anticipates awarding
approximately the same amount of grants funds to applicants that
meet Absolute Priority 1 as to those that meet Absolute Priority 2,
but the Secretary is not bound by these estimates. Applicants must
clearly identify the specific absolute priority that the proposed
project addresses.
These priorities are:
Absolute Priority 1: Develop and Maintain New Native American Language
Programs
To meet this priority, an applicant must propose to develop and
maintain a Native American language instructional program that--
(a) Will support Native American language education and development
for Native American students, as well as provide professional
development for teachers and, as appropriate, staff and administrators,
to strengthen the overall language and academic goals of the school or
schools that will be served by the project;
(b) Will take place in a school; and
(c) Does not augment or replace a program of identical scope that
was active within the last three years at the school(s) to be served.
Absolute Priority 2: Expand and Improve Existing Native American
Language Programs
To meet this priority, an applicant must propose to improve and
expand a Native American language instructional program that--
(a) Will improve and expand Native American language education and
development for Native American students, as well as provide
professional development for teachers and, as appropriate, staff and
administrators, to strengthen the overall language and academic goals
of the school or schools that will be served by the project;
(b) Will continue to take place in a school; and
(c) Within the past three years has been offered at the school(s)
to be served.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional
seven points to an application, depending on how well an application
meets Competitive Preference Priority 1, and we award an additional
five points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 2. The maximum number of competitive preference priority
points is 12.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1: Support Project Sustainability With
Title VI Indian Education Formula Grant Funds (up to 7 Points)
To meet this priority, an applicant or a partner must receive, or
be eligible to receive, a formula grant under title VI of the
Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, as amended (ESEA), and
must commit to use all or part of that formula grant to help sustain
this project after the conclusion of the grant period. To meet this
priority, an applicant must include in its application--
(a) A statement that indicates the school year in which the entity
will begin using title VI formula grant funds to help support this
project;
(b) The percentage of the title VI grant that will be used for the
project, which must be at least--
(i) 20 percent of the applicant's title VI formula grant (3 point);
(ii) 40 percent of the applicant's title VI formula grant (4
points);
[[Page 42372]]
(iii) 60 percent of the applicant's title VI formula grant (5
points);
(iv) 80 percent of the applicant's title VI formula grant (6
points); or
(v) 100 percent of the applicant's title VI formula grant (7
points); and
(c) The timeline for obtaining parent committee input and approval
of this action, if necessary.
Competitive Preference Priority 2: Preference for Indian Applicants (0
or 5 Points)
To meet this priority, an application must be submitted by an
Indian Tribe, Indian organization, Bureau of Indian Education (BIE)-
funded school, or Tribal College or University (TCU) that is eligible
to participate in the [email protected] program. A consortium of eligible entities
that meets the requirements of 34 CFR 75.127 through 75.129 and
includes an Indian Tribe, Indian organization, BIE-funded school, or
TCU will also be considered eligible to meet this priority. In order to
be considered a consortium application, the application must include
the consortium agreement, signed by all parties.
Application Requirements: These application requirements are from
section 6133(c) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7453) and from the NFP. For FY
2020 and any subsequent year in which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition, applicants must meet the
following application requirements.
Each application for funds must include the following:
(1) General Requirements. The following requirements apply to all
applicants submitted under this competition. An applicant must include
in its application--
(a) A completed information form that includes:
(i) Instructional language. The name of the Native American or
Alaska Native language to be used for instruction at the school(s)
supported by the eligible entity.
(ii) Students to be served. The number of students to be served by
the project and the grade level(s) of targeted students in the proposed
project.
(iii) Instructional hours. The number of hours of instruction per
week in and through one or more Native American or Alaska Native
languages currently being provided to targeted students at such
school(s), if any.
(iv) Pre- and post-assessments. Whether a pre- and post-assessment
of Native American language proficiency is available and, if not, the
percentage of grant funds that will be used for developing such
assessment.
(v) Program description. A description of how the eligible entity
will support Native American language education and development, and
provide professional development for staff, in order to strengthen the
overall language and academic goals of the school(s) that will be
served by the project; ensure the implementation of rigorous academic
content that prepares all students for college and career; and ensure
that students' progress toward meeting high-level fluency goals in the
Native American language.
(vi) Organizational information. For each school included in the
project, information regarding the school's organizational governance
or affiliations, specifically information about the school's governing
entity (such as a local educational agency (LEA), Tribal educational
agency or department, charter organization, private organization, or
other governing entity); the school's accreditation status; any
partnerships with institutions of higher education; and any indigenous
language schooling and research cooperatives.
(b) An assurance that for each school to be included in the
project--
(i) The school is engaged in meeting State or Tribally designated
long-term goals for students, as may be required by applicable Federal,
State, or Tribal law;
(ii) The school provides assessments of students using the Native
American or Alaska Native language of instruction, where possible;
(iii) The qualifications of all instructional and leadership
personnel at such school are sufficient to deliver high-quality
education through the Native American or Alaska Native language used in
the school; and
(iv) The school will collect and report to the public data relative
to student achievement and, if appropriate, rates of high school
graduation, career readiness, and enrollment in postsecondary education
or workforce development programs, of students who are enrolled in the
school's programs.
(2) Memorandum of Agreement. Any applicant that proposes to work
with a partner to carry out the proposed project must include a signed
and dated memorandum of agreement that describes the roles and
responsibilities of each partner to participate in the grant,
including--
(i) A description of how each partner will implement the project
according to the timelines described in the grant application;
(ii) The roles and responsibilities of each partner related to
ensuring the data necessary to report on the Government Performance and
Results Act (GPRA) indicators; and
(iii) The roles and responsibilities of each partner related to
ensuring that Native American language instructors can be recruited,
retained, and trained, as appropriate, in a timely manner.
This memorandum of agreement must be signed no more than four
months prior to the application deadline (i.e., the agreement must be
signed within the four months prior to the application deadline).
(3) Applicant Engagement with Indian Tribes and Tribal
Organizations. All non-Tribal applicants must engage with appropriate
officials from Tribe(s) located in the area served by the project, or
with a local Tribal organization, prior to submission of an
application. The engagement must provide for the opportunity for
officials from Tribes or Tribal organizations to meaningfully and
substantively contribute to the application. Non-Tribal applicants must
submit evidence of either Tribal engagement or a letter of support from
one or more Tribes or Tribal organizations. This evidence can be part
of the memorandum of agreement required by Application Requirement 2 or
can be uploaded as a separate attachment.
Note: If an applicant is an affected LEA that is subject to
ESEA section 8538, then the LEA is required to consult with
appropriate officials from Tribe(s) or Tribal organizations approved
by the Tribes located in the area served by the LEA prior to its
submission of an application, on the contents of the application as
required under ESEA section 8538. Affected LEAs are those that have
50 percent or more of their student enrollment made up of Native
American students; or received an Indian education formula grant
under title VI of the ESEA in the previous fiscal year that exceeds
$40,000. (ESEA sec. 8538)
(4) Certification. An applicant that is an LEA (including a public
charter school that is an LEA under State law), a school operated by
the BIE, or a nontribal for-profit or nonprofit organization must
submit a certification from an entity described in application
requirement (4)(a), containing the assurances described in application
requirement (4)(b).
(a) The certification must be from one of the following entities,
on whose land the school or program is located, or that is an entity
served by the school, or whose members (as defined by that entity) are
served by the school:
(i) A federally recognized Indian Tribe or Tribal organization.
(ii) A TCU.
(iii) An Alaska Native Regional Corporation or an Alaska Native
nonprofit organization.
[[Page 42373]]
(iv) A Native Hawaiian organization.
(b) The certification must state that--
(i) The school or applicant organization has the capacity to
provide education primarily through a Native American or an Alaska
Native language; and
(ii) There are sufficient speakers of the target language at the
school or available to be hired by the school or applicant
organization.
Program Requirements: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which
we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, grantees must adhere to the following program
requirements:
(1) Native American Language Proficiency Assessment. Grantees must
administer pre- and post-assessments of Native American language
proficiency to participating students. This Native American language
assessment may be any relevant tool that measures student Native
American language proficiency, such as oral, written or project-based
assessments, and formative or summative assessments.
(2) Diversity of Languages. To ensure a diversity of languages as
required by statute, the Department will not fund more than one project
in any competition year that proposes to use the same Native American
language, assuming there are enough high-quality applications. In the
event of a lack of high-quality applications in one competition year,
the Department may choose to fund more than one project with the same
Native American language.
(3) Geographic Distribution. To ensure geographic diversity,
assuming there are enough high-quality applications, the Department
will not exclusively fund projects that all propose to serve students
in the same State in any competition year. In the event of a lack of
high-quality applications in one competition year, the Department may
choose to fund only applications that propose to provide services in
one State.
(4) ISDEAA Statutory Hiring Preference:
(a) Awards that are primarily for the benefit of Indians are
subject to the provisions of section 7(b) of the Indian Self-
Determination and Education Assistance Act (Pub. L. 93-638). That
section requires that, to the greatest extent feasible, a grantee--
(1) Give to Indians preferences and opportunities for training and
employment in connection with the administration of the grant; and
(2) Give to Indian organizations and to Indian-owned economic
enterprises, as defined in section 3 of the Indian Financing Act of
1974 (25 U.S.C. 1452(e)), preference in the award of contracts in
connection with the administration of the grant.
(b) For purposes of this section, an Indian is a member of any
federally recognized Indian Tribe.
Definitions: The definitions of ``Indian organization (or Tribal
organization)'' and ``Tribe'' are from the NFP. The definitions of
``Native American,'' ``Native American language,'' and ``Tribal college
or university'' are from the ESEA.
Indian organization (or Tribal organization) means an organization
that--
(1) Is legally established--
(i) By Tribal or inter-Tribal charter or in accordance with State
or Tribal law; and
(ii) With appropriate constitution, bylaws, or articles of
incorporation;
(2) Includes in its purposes the promotion of the education of
Indians;
(3) Is controlled by a governing board, the majority of which is
Indian;
(4) If located on an Indian reservation, operates with the sanction
of or by charter from the governing body of that reservation;
(5) Is neither an organization or subdivision of, nor under the
direct control of, any institution of higher education or TCU; and
(6) Is not an agency of State or local government.
Native American means:
(1) ``Indian'' as defined in section 6151(3) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7491(3)), which includes individuals who are Alaska Natives and members
of federally recognized or State recognized Tribes;
(2) Native Hawaiian; or
(3) Native American Pacific Islander. (ESEA secs. 6151(3) and
8101(34))
Native American language means the historical, traditional
languages spoken by Native Americans. (ESEA sec. 8101(34))
Tribal college or university means an institution that--
(1) Qualifies for funding under the Tribally Controlled Colleges
and Universities Assistance Act of 1978 (25 U.S.C. 1801, et seq.) or
the Navajo Community College Act (25 U.S.C. 640a note); or
(2) Is cited in section 532 of the Equity in Educational Land-Grant
Status Act of 1994 (7 U.S.C. 301 note). (ESEA sec. 6133 and section 316
of the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended)
Tribe means either a federally recognized Tribe or a State-
recognized Tribe.
Program Authority: 20 U.S.C. 7453.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86,
97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The NFP.
Note: The open licensing requirement in 2 CFR 3474.20 does not
apply to this program.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian Tribes.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 86 apply to IHEs only.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $1,546,986.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in FY 2021 from the list of
unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $300,000-$400,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $350,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 4.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: Up to 36 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. The following entities, either alone or in a consortium, that
have a plan to develop and maintain, or to improve and expand, programs
that support the entity's use of a Native American or Alaska Native
language as the primary language of instruction in one or more
elementary or secondary schools (or both) are eligible under this
program:
(a) An Indian Tribe.
(b) A Tribal College or University (TCU).
(c) A Tribal education agency.
(d) An LEA, including a public charter school that is an LEA under
State law.
(e) A school operated by the Bureau of Indian Education (BIE).
(f) An Alaska Native Regional Corporation (as described in section
3(g) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602(g))).
(g) A private, Tribal, or Alaska Native nonprofit organization.
[[Page 42374]]
(h) A non-Tribal for-profit organization.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Other: Projects funded under this competition should budget for
a two-day Project Directors' meeting in Washington, DC during each year
of the project period.
4. Funding Restrictions: Under ESEA section 6133(g), no more than
five percent of funds awarded for a grant under this program may be
used for administrative purposes, and for grants made using FY 2020
funds this administrative cost cap applies only to direct
administrative costs, not indirect costs.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for this competition,
your application may include business information that you consider
proprietary. In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and
describe the process we use in determining whether any of that
information is proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public by posting them on our website, you may wish to request
confidentiality of business information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However,
under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental review in order to
make awards by the end of FY 2020.
4. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative is where you,
the applicant, address the selection criteria that reviewers use to
evaluate your application. We recommend that you (1) limit the
application narrative to no more than 30 pages and (2) use the
following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to the cover sheet; the
budget section, including the narrative budget justification; the
assurances and certifications; or the one-page abstract, the resumes,
the bibliography, the letter(s) of support, or the signed consortium
agreement. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the
application narrative. An application will not be disqualified if it
exceeds the recommended page limit.
5. Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to review
grant applications more efficiently if we know the approximate number
of applicants that intend to apply. Therefore, we strongly encourage
each potential applicant to notify us of their intent to submit an
application. To do so, please email the program contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT with the subject line ``Intent to
Apply,'' and include the applicant's name and a contact person's name
and email address. Applicants that do not submit a notice of intent to
apply may still apply for funding; applicants that do submit a notice
of intent to apply are not bound to apply or bound by the information
provided.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria. The selection criteria are from the NFP and
34 CFR 75.210. The source of each selection criterion, and the maximum
possible score for addressing each criterion and subcriterion, is
included in parentheses. The maximum possible score for addressing all
of the criteria in this section is 100 points.
In evaluating an application, the Secretary considers the following
criteria:
(a) Quality of the project design (27 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable.
(9 points) (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(2) The extent to which the project design will ensure that
students' progress toward grade-level and developmentally appropriate
fluency in the Native American language. (6 points) (NFP)
(3) The extent to which the proposed project will incorporate
parent engagement and participation in Native American language
instruction. (6 points) (NFP)
(4) The quality of the approach to developing and administering
pre- and post-assessments of student Native American language
proficiency, including consultation with individuals with assessment
expertise, as needed. (6 points) (NFP)
(b) Quality of project services (28 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the services to be provided by the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(1) The quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal
access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members
of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability. (1 point) (34 CFR
75.210(d)(2))
(2) The quality of the plan for supporting grade-level and
developmentally appropriate instruction in a Native American language
by providing instruction of or through the Native American language.
(10 points) (NFP)
(3) The extent to which the project will provide professional
development for teachers and, as appropriate, staff and administrators
to strengthen the overall language proficiency and academic goals of
the school(s) that will be served by the project, including cultural
competence training for all staff in the school(s). (10 points) (NFP)
(4) The extent to which the services to be provided by the proposed
project involve the collaboration of appropriate partners for
maximizing the
[[Page 42375]]
effectiveness of project services. (4 points) (34 CFR 75.210(d)(3)(ix))
(5) The extent to which the percentage of the school day that
instruction will be provided in the Native American language is
ambitious and is reasonable for the grade level and population served.
(3 points) (NFP)
(c) Quality of project personnel (20 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project. In determining the quality of project
personnel, the Secretary considers:
(1) The extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability. (1 point) (34 CFR 75.210(e)(2))
(2) The extent to which teachers of the Native American language
who are identified as staff for this project have teaching experience
and are fluent in the Native American language. (13 points) (NFP)
(3) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel. (6 points) (34 CFR 75.210(e)(3)(ii))
(d) Adequacy of resources (11 points).
The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project. In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers:
(1) The extent to which the costs are reasonable in relation to the
objectives, design, and potential significance of the proposed project.
(7 points) (34 CFR 75.210(f)(2)(iv))
(2) The potential for continued support of the project after
Federal funding ends, including, as appropriate, the demonstrated
commitment of appropriate entities to such support. (4 points) (34 CFR
75.210(f)(2)(vi))
(e) Quality of the management plan (14 points). The Secretary
considers the quality of the management plan for the proposed project.
In determining the quality of the management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers:
(1) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks. (8 points) (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(i))
(2) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed
project. (6 points) (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(iv))
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this program, the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management (SAM).
You may review and comment on any information about yourself that a
Federal agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we will notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
4. Performance Measures: The Department has established the
[[Page 42376]]
following GPRA performance measures for the [email protected] program:
(a) The number and percentage of students who attain proficiency in
a Native Language as determined by each grantee through pre- and post-
assessments of Native language proficiency;
(b) The number and percentage of participating students who make
progress in learning a Native language, as determined by each grantee,
through pre- and post-assessments of Native language proficiency;
(c) The number and percentage of participating students who show an
improvement in academic outcomes, as measured by academic assessments
or other indicators; and
(d) The difference between the average daily attendance of
participating students and the average daily attendance of all students
in the comparison group (e.g., school, LEA, Tribe or other).
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success
for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant
under this program to carefully consider these measures in
conceptualizing the approach to, and evaluation for, its proposed
project. Each grantee will be required to provide, in its annual
performance and final reports, data about its progress in meeting these
measures.
5. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020-15222 Filed 7-13-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P