Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results, 39520-39522 [2020-14202]

Download as PDF 39520 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices validity of the method and assumptions used; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information, including through the use of appropriate automated, electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques, or other forms of information technology. Comments may be sent to both FSIS, at the addresses provided above, and the Desk Officer for Agriculture, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, DC 20253. Responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the request for OMB approval. All comments will also become a matter of public record. Additional Public Notification Public awareness of all segments of rulemaking and policy development is important. Consequently, FSIS will announce this Federal Register publication on-line through the FSIS web page located at: http:// www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register. FSIS will also announce and provide a link to this Federal Register publication through the FSIS Constituent Update, which is used to provide information regarding FSIS policies, procedures, regulations, Federal Register notices, FSIS public meetings, and other types of information that could affect or would be of interest to our constituents and stakeholders. The Constituent Update is available on the FSIS web page. Through the web page, FSIS can provide information to a much broader, more diverse audience. In addition, FSIS offers an email subscription service which provides automatic and customized access to selected food safety news and information. This service is available at: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. Options range from recalls to export information, regulations, directives, and notices. Customers can add or delete subscriptions themselves and have the option to password protect their accounts. USDA Non-Discrimination Statement No agency, officer, or employee of the USDA shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/ parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, or political beliefs, exclude from participation in, deny the benefits of, or subject to discrimination any person in the United States under any program or activity conducted by the USDA. VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 How To File a Complaint of Discrimination To file a complaint of discrimination, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, which may be accessed online at http:// www.ocio.usda.gov/sites/default/files/ docs/2012/Complain_combined_6_8_ 12.pdf, or write a letter signed by you or your authorized representative. Send your completed complaint form or letter to USDA by mail, fax, or email: Mail: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Director, Office of Adjudication, 1400 Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250–9410; Fax: (202) 690–7442; Email: program.intake@usda.gov. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication (braille, large print, audiotape, etc.), should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 (voice and TDD). Paul Kiecker, Administrator. [FR Doc. 2020–14101 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–979] Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, From the People’s Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On June 15, 2020, the United States Court of International Trade (the Court) sustained the second remand redetermination pertaining to the 2014– 2015 antidumping duty (AD) administrative review of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled into modules (solar cells), from the People’s Republic of China (China). The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the final judgment in this litigation is not in harmony with Commerce’s final results in the 2014– 2015 AD administrative review of solar cells from China, and therefore, Commerce is amending those final results, as explained below. DATES: Applicable June 25, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance— AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482–2769. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On June 27, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results of the 2014– 2015 AD administrative review of solar cells from China.1 On April 16, 2019, the Court directed Commerce to reconsider or further explain its surrogate value selections for Canadian Solar International Limited (Canadian Solar) 2 and Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.’s (Trina) 3 module glass, its application of an adverse inference, in part, in calculating Canadian Solar’s dumping margin, and its decision not to grant Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. (Qixin) a separate rate.4 In the First Remand Redetermination, Commerce continued to calculate Canadian Solar’s dumping margin using partial adverse facts available (AFA) in valuing factors of production (FOP) for which consumption quantities were not provided by certain unaffiliated suppliers.5 With regard to Qixin, Commerce continued to find that Qixin is not eligible for a separate rate.6 Commerce also determined, under respectful protest, to value Canadian 1 See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2014–2015, 82 FR 29033 (June 27, 2017), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Final Results). 2 In this review Commerce treated the following six companies as a single entity: Canadian Solar International Limited; Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc.; Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Luoyang), Inc.; CSI Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd.; and CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled Into Modules, from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 2014– 2015, 81 FR 93888 (December 22, 2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum (PDM) at 6–7, unchanged in Final Results. 3 In this review Commerce treated the following six companies as a single entity: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. See Preliminary Results PDM at 6– 7, unchanged in Final Results. 4 See Canadian Solar International Limited, et. al. v. United States, 378 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (CIT 2019). 5 Results of Remand Redetermination, Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United States, Court No. 17–00173, Slip. Op. 19–47 (CIT April 16, 2019) (July 15, 2019) (First Remand Redetermination). 6 Id. E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices Solar and Trina’s module glass using the Bulgarian Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) subheading 7007.19.80, instead of the Thailand HTS subheading 7007.19.90.7 On December 3, 2019, the Court sustained Commerce’s selection of Bulgarian import data to value module glass, and its decision not to grant Qixin a separate rate; however, the Court remanded for further explanation or reconsideration Commerce’s application of partial AFA in calculating Canadian Solar’s dumping margin.8 In the Second Remand Redetermination, pursuant to the Court’s holding in Canadian Solar II, Commerce determined, under respectful protest, to base Canadian Solar’s unreported FOP consumption on partial facts available rather than partial AFA.9 Specifically, Commerce based the unreported consumption on the average of the consumption that was reported for certain of Canadian Solar’s FOPs.10 Commerce assigned the margin calculated for Canadian Solar to those respondents eligible for a separate rate and which participated in the litigation.11 On June 15, 2020, the Court sustained the Second Remand Redetermination.12 Timken Notice In its decision in Timken,13 as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,14 the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of a court decision that is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The Court’s June 15, 2020, final judgment sustaining Commerce’s Second Remand Redetermination constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with Commerce’s Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Amended Final Results Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending its Final Results. The amended weightedaverage dumping margin for the respondents is below: Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) Exporter Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar Manufacturing .................. (Luoyang)Inc./CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI–GCL Solar Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power (China) Inc ................... Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd ...................................................................................................................................................................... Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................ ERA Solar Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................................................................................. ET Solar Energy Limited ..................................................................................................................................................................... Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd .............................................................................................................. Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd ..................................................................................................................................... JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................ Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................... Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................... JingAo Solar Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................................................... Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................. Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. Risen Energy Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................................... Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................................... Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................. Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd ....................................................................................................................................................... Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd ......................................................................................................................................................... Star Power International Limited ......................................................................................................................................................... Systemes Versilis, Inc ......................................................................................................................................................................... Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd ................................................................................................................................................................. tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd ............................................................................................................................................................. Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd .......................................................................................................................................... Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd ..................................................................................................................................................... Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd .................................................................................................................................................................. Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd ........................................................................................................................................... Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology Limited Liability Company ........................................................................ Accordingly, Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation of the 7 See First Remand Redetermination. Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United States, 415 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (CIT 2019) (Canadian Solar II). 9 See Final Results of Second Redetermination Pursuant to Court Order, Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United States, Court 8 See VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 39521 3.19 0.00 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 3.19 subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. In the event No. 17–00173, Slip. Op. 19–47 (CIT December 3, 2019) (February 10, 2020). 10 Id. 11 Id. 12 See Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United States, Consol. Court No. 17–00173, Slip Op. 20–83. 13 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. Cir. 1990). 14 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010). PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 39522 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices the Court’s ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise exported by the respondents using assessment rates based on these amended final results of review. Cash Deposit Requirements Because the cash deposit rate for all of the respondents listed above, with the exception of Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd., Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd., Star Power International Limited, and Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd., have been superseded by cash deposit rates calculated in intervening administrative reviews of the AD order on solar cells from China, we will not alter the cash deposit rate currently in effect for these respondents based on these amended final results. Effective June 25, 2020, the cash deposit rate applicable to entries of subject merchandise exported by Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd., Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd., Star Power International Limited, and Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. is 3.19 percent. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act. Dated: June 25, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–14202 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [C–489–843] Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand From the Republic of Turkey: Postponement of Preliminary Determination of Countervailing Duty Investigation Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable July 1, 2020. Whitley Herndon, AD/CVD Operations, Office II, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–6274. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 Postponement of Preliminary Determination Section 703(b)(1) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), requires Commerce to issue the preliminary determination in a CVD investigation within 65 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation. However, section 703(c)(1) of the Act permits Commerce to postpone the preliminary determination until no later than 130 days after the date on which Commerce initiated the investigation if: (A) The petitioner makes a timely request for a postponement; or (B) Commerce concludes that the parties concerned are cooperating, that the investigation is extraordinarily complicated, and that additional time is necessary to make a preliminary determination. Under 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioner must submit a request for postponement 25 days or more before the scheduled date of the preliminary determination and must state the reasons for the request. Commerce will grant the request unless it finds compelling reasons to deny the request.2 On June 12, 2020, the petitioners 3 submitted a timely request that Commerce postpone the preliminary CVD determination.4 The petitioners request postponement to allow the petitioners and other interested parties additional time to analyze the initial questionnaire responses submitted by respondents and the Government of Turkey, and for Commerce to request additional or clarifying information, if necessary.5 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.205(e), the petitioners have stated the reasons for requesting a postponement of the preliminary determination, and Commerce finds no 1 See FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: VerDate Sep<11>2014 Background On May 6, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) initiated a countervailing duty (CVD) investigation on imports of prestressed concrete steel wire strand (PC strand) from the Republic of Turkey (Turkey).1 Currently, the preliminary determination is due no later than July 10, 2020. Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Turkey: Initiation of Countervailing Duty Investigation, 85 FR 28610 (May 13, 2020). 2 See 19 CFR 351.205(e). 3 The petitioners consist of Insteel Wire Products Company, Sumiden Wire Products Corporation, and Wire Mesh Corporation. 4 See Petitioners’ Letter, ‘‘Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand from the Republic of Turkey— Petitioners’ Request to Postpone Preliminary Determination,’’ dated June 12, 2020. 5 Id. at 2. PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 compelling reason to deny the request. Therefore, pursuant with section 703(c)(1)(A) of the Act, Commerce is postponing the deadline for the preliminary determination to no later than 130 days after the day on which these investigations were initiated, i.e., September 14, 2020.6 Pursuant to section 705(a)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.210(b)(1), the deadline for the final determination of this investigation will continue to be 75 days after the date of the preliminary determination, unless postponed at a later date. Notification to Interested Parties This notice is issued and published pursuant to section 703(c)(2) of the Act. Dated: June 25, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–14199 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–008, C–570–009] Calcium Hypochlorite From the People’s Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping Duty Order and Countervailing Duty Order Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) order and countervailing duty (CVD) orders on calcium hypochlorite from the People’s Republic of China (China) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD and CVD orders. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable July 1, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rachel Greenberg, Office V, AD/CVD Operations, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of 6 The 130th day falls on Sunday, September 13, 2020. It is Commerce’s practice that where a deadline falls on a weekend or federal holiday, the appropriate deadline is the next business day. See Notice of Clarification: Application of ‘‘Next Business Day’’ Rule for Administrative Determination Deadlines Pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930, As Amended, 70 FR 24533 (May 10, 2005). E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39520-39522]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14202]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-979]


Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled 
Into Modules, From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court 
Decision Not in Harmony With Final Results of Antidumping Duty 
Administrative Review and Notice of Amended Final Results

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: On June 15, 2020, the United States Court of International 
Trade (the Court) sustained the second remand redetermination 
pertaining to the 2014-2015 antidumping duty (AD) administrative review 
of crystalline silicon photovoltaic cells, whether or not assembled 
into modules (solar cells), from the People's Republic of China 
(China). The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public 
that the final judgment in this litigation is not in harmony with 
Commerce's final results in the 2014-2015 AD administrative review of 
solar cells from China, and therefore, Commerce is amending those final 
results, as explained below.

DATES: Applicable June 25, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeff Pedersen, AD/CVD Operations, 
Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance--International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue 
NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone (202) 482-2769.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On June 27, 2017, Commerce published its Final Results of the 2014-
2015 AD administrative review of solar cells from China.\1\ On April 
16, 2019, the Court directed Commerce to reconsider or further explain 
its surrogate value selections for Canadian Solar International Limited 
(Canadian Solar) \2\ and Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.'s 
(Trina) \3\ module glass, its application of an adverse inference, in 
part, in calculating Canadian Solar's dumping margin, and its decision 
not to grant Ningbo Qixin Solar Electrical Appliance Co., Ltd. (Qixin) 
a separate rate.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not 
Assembled Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 82 FR 29033 (June 27, 
2017), and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Final 
Results).
    \2\ In this review Commerce treated the following six companies 
as a single entity: Canadian Solar International Limited; Canadian 
Solar Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc.; Canadian Solar Manufacturing 
(Luoyang), Inc.; CSI Cells Co., Ltd.; CSI-GCL Solar Manufacturing 
(YanCheng) Co., Ltd.; and CSI Solar Power (China) Inc. See 
Crystalline Silicon Photovoltaic Cells, Whether or Not Assembled 
Into Modules, from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Preliminary 
Determination of No Shipments; 2014-2015, 81 FR 93888 (December 22, 
2016) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Preliminary Decision 
Memorandum (PDM) at 6-7, unchanged in Final Results.
    \3\ In this review Commerce treated the following six companies 
as a single entity: Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; Trina 
Solar (Changzhou) Science & Technology Co., Ltd.; Yancheng Trina 
Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd.; Changzhou Trina Solar Yabang 
Energy Co., Ltd.; Turpan Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd.; and Hubei 
Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd. See Preliminary Results PDM at 6-7, 
unchanged in Final Results.
    \4\ See Canadian Solar International Limited, et. al. v. United 
States, 378 F. Supp. 3d 1292 (CIT 2019).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the First Remand Redetermination, Commerce continued to 
calculate Canadian Solar's dumping margin using partial adverse facts 
available (AFA) in valuing factors of production (FOP) for which 
consumption quantities were not provided by certain unaffiliated 
suppliers.\5\ With regard to Qixin, Commerce continued to find that 
Qixin is not eligible for a separate rate.\6\ Commerce also determined, 
under respectful protest, to value Canadian

[[Page 39521]]

Solar and Trina's module glass using the Bulgarian Harmonized Tariff 
Schedule (HTS) subheading 7007.19.80, instead of the Thailand HTS 
subheading 7007.19.90.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ Results of Remand Redetermination, Canadian Solar 
International Limited, et al. v. United States, Court No. 17-00173, 
Slip. Op. 19-47 (CIT April 16, 2019) (July 15, 2019) (First Remand 
Redetermination).
    \6\ Id.
    \7\ See First Remand Redetermination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    On December 3, 2019, the Court sustained Commerce's selection of 
Bulgarian import data to value module glass, and its decision not to 
grant Qixin a separate rate; however, the Court remanded for further 
explanation or reconsideration Commerce's application of partial AFA in 
calculating Canadian Solar's dumping margin.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United 
States, 415 F. Supp. 3d 1326 (CIT 2019) (Canadian Solar II).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    In the Second Remand Redetermination, pursuant to the Court's 
holding in Canadian Solar II, Commerce determined, under respectful 
protest, to base Canadian Solar's unreported FOP consumption on partial 
facts available rather than partial AFA.\9\ Specifically, Commerce 
based the unreported consumption on the average of the consumption that 
was reported for certain of Canadian Solar's FOPs.\10\ Commerce 
assigned the margin calculated for Canadian Solar to those respondents 
eligible for a separate rate and which participated in the 
litigation.\11\ On June 15, 2020, the Court sustained the Second Remand 
Redetermination.\12\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See Final Results of Second Redetermination Pursuant to 
Court Order, Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United 
States, Court No. 17-00173, Slip. Op. 19-47 (CIT December 3, 2019) 
(February 10, 2020).
    \10\ Id.
    \11\ Id.
    \12\ See Canadian Solar International Limited, et al. v. United 
States, Consol. Court No. 17-00173, Slip Op. 20-83.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Timken Notice

    In its decision in Timken,\13\ as clarified by Diamond 
Sawblades,\14\ the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal 
Circuit (CAFC) held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) and (e) of the 
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a 
notice of a court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce 
determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a 
``conclusive'' court decision. The Court's June 15, 2020, final 
judgment sustaining Commerce's Second Remand Redetermination 
constitutes a final decision of the Court that is not in harmony with 
Commerce's Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of 
the publication requirements of Timken.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337, 341 (Fed. 
Cir. 1990).
    \14\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 
F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results

    Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending 
its Final Results. The amended weighted-average dumping margin for the 
respondents is below:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Weighted-
                                                              average
                        Exporter                              dumping
                                                              margin
                                                             (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Canadian Solar International Limited/Canadian Solar                 3.19
 Manufacturing (Changshu), Inc./Canadian Solar
 Manufacturing..........................................
(Luoyang)Inc./CSI Cells Co., Ltd./CSI-GCL Solar
 Manufacturing (YanCheng) Co., Ltd./CSI Solar Power
 (China) Inc............................................
Changzhou Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd./Trina Solar                  0.00
 (Changzhou) Science and Technology Co., Ltd./Yancheng
 Trina Solar Energy Technology Co., Ltd./Changzhou Trina
 Solar Yabang Energy Co., Ltd./Turpan Trina Solar Energy
 Co., Ltd./Hubei Trina Solar Energy Co., Ltd............
Chint Solar (Zhejiang) Co., Ltd.........................            3.19
ERA Solar Co., Ltd......................................            3.19
ET Solar Energy Limited.................................            3.19
Hangzhou Sunny Energy Science and Technology Co., Ltd...            3.19
Hengdian Group DMEGC Magnetics Co. Ltd..................            3.19
JA Solar Technology Yangzhou Co., Ltd...................            3.19
Jiawei Solarchina (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd...................            3.19
Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd...............................            3.19
JingAo Solar Co., Ltd...................................            3.19
Lightway Green New Energy Co., Ltd......................            3.19
Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd...............................            3.19
Risen Energy Co., Ltd...................................            3.19
Shanghai BYD Co., Ltd...................................            3.19
Shanghai JA Solar Technology Co., Ltd...................            3.19
Shenzhen Sungold Solar Co., Ltd.........................            3.19
Shenzhen Topray Solar Co., Ltd..........................            3.19
Star Power International Limited........................            3.19
Systemes Versilis, Inc..................................            3.19
Taizhou BD Trade Co., Ltd...............................            3.19
tenKsolar (Shanghai) Co., Ltd...........................            3.19
Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd...................            3.19
Wuxi Tianran Photovoltaic Co., Ltd......................            3.19
Yingli Energy (China) Company Limited/Baoding Tianwei               3.19
 Yingli New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Tianjin Yingli
 New Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Hengshui Yingli New
 Energy Resources Co., Ltd./Lixian Yingli New Energy
 Resources Co., Ltd./Baoding Jiasheng Photovoltaic
 Technology Co., Ltd./Beijing Tianneng Yingli New Energy
 Resources Co., Ltd./Hainan Yingli New Energy Resources
 Co., Ltd...............................................
Zhejiang ERA Solar Technology Co., Ltd..................            3.19
Zhejiang Sunflower Light Energy Science & Technology                3.19
 Limited Liability Company..............................
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Accordingly, Commerce will continue the suspension of liquidation 
of the subject merchandise pending the expiration of the period of 
appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision. 
In the event

[[Page 39522]]

the Court's ruling is not appealed or, if appealed, upheld by the CAFC, 
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to assess 
antidumping duties on unliquidated entries of subject merchandise 
exported by the respondents using assessment rates based on these 
amended final results of review.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    Because the cash deposit rate for all of the respondents listed 
above, with the exception of Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd., Ningbo ETDZ 
Holdings, Ltd., Star Power International Limited, and Toenergy 
Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd., have been superseded by cash deposit 
rates calculated in intervening administrative reviews of the AD order 
on solar cells from China, we will not alter the cash deposit rate 
currently in effect for these respondents based on these amended final 
results. Effective June 25, 2020, the cash deposit rate applicable to 
entries of subject merchandise exported by Jiawei Solarchina Co. Ltd., 
Ningbo ETDZ Holdings, Ltd., Star Power International Limited, and 
Toenergy Technology Hangzhou Co., Ltd. is 3.19 percent.

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 
516A(e), 751(a)(1), and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

    Dated: June 25, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-14202 Filed 6-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P