Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review, 39531-39534 [2020-14195]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices
received no other requests for an
administrative review of the
antidumping duty order.
Rescission of Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1),
Commerce will rescind an
administrative review ‘‘in whole or in
part, if a party that requested a review
withdraws the request within 90 days of
the date of publication of notice of
initiation of the requested review.’’ All
respondents withdrew their requests for
review within 90-days of the
publication date of the Initiation Notice.
Because we received no other requests
for review of the respondents, and no
other requests for the review of the
order on truck and bus tires from China
with respect to other companies subject
to the order, we are rescinding the
administrative review of the order in its
entirety, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(d)(1).
Assessment
Commerce will instruct U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) to assess
antidumping duties on all appropriate
entries of truck and bus tires from China
during the POR at rates equal to the cash
deposit rate of estimated antidumping
duties required at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption, in accordance with 19
CFR 351.212(c)(1)(i). Commerce intends
to issue appropriate assessment
instructions to CBP 15 days after
publication of this notice in the Federal
Register.
Review Truck and Bus Tires from China,’’ dated
April 9, 2020; see also Sailun Group’s Letter,
‘‘Sailun Withdrawal of Review Request in POR 1 of
the Antidumping Duty Review of Truck and Bus
Tires from the People’s Republic of China (A–570–
040),’’ dated April 14, 2020; Guangrao Kaichi
Trading’s Letter, ‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from the
People’s Republic of China—Withdrawal of Request
for Antidumping Administrative Review,’’ dated
April 30, 2020; Shandong Huasheng’s Letter,
‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from the People’s Republic
of China—Withdrawal of Request for Antidumping
Administrative Review,’’ dated April 30, 2020;
Triangle Tyre’s Letter, ‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from
the People’s Republic of China–Withdrawal of
Triangle Tyre Request for the First Administrative
Review,’’ dated April 30, 2020; Gaopeng
Respondents’s Letter, ‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from
the People’s Republic of China—Withdrawal of
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated May 6,
2020; Tongli Tyre’s Letter, ‘‘Tongli Withdrawal of
Review Request in POR 1 of the Antidumping Duty
Review of Truck and Bus Tires from the People’s
Republic of China (A–570–040),’’ dated May 14,
2020; Giti Tire’s Letter, ‘‘Truck and Bus Tires from
the People’s Republic of China: Withdrawal of
Request for Administrative Review,’’ dated May 28,
2020; and see Giti Tire’s Letter, ‘‘Re: Truck and Bus
Tires from the People’s Republic of China:
Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review—
Clarification,’’ dated June 22, 2020.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01:53 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
39531
Notification to Importers
This notice serves as a final reminder
to importers of their responsibility
under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a
certificate regarding the reimbursement
of antidumping duties prior to
liquidation of the relevant entries
during this review period. Failure to
comply with this requirement could
result in Commerce’s presumption that
reimbursement of antidumping duties
occurred and the subsequent assessment
of doubled antidumping duties.
Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may
request, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.213, that the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) conduct an
administrative review of that
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of
comments or actions by Commerce
discussed below refer to the number of
calendar days from the applicable
starting date.
Notification Regarding Administrative
Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder
to parties subject to administrative
protective order (APO) of their
responsibility concerning the
disposition of proprietary information
disclosed under APO in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely
written notification of the return or
destruction of APO materials or
conversion to judicial protective order is
hereby requested. Failure to comply
with the regulations and the terms of an
APO is a sanctionable violation.
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and
777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.213(d)(4).
Respondent Selection
In the event Commerce limits the
number of respondents for individual
examination for administrative reviews
initiated pursuant to requests made for
the orders identified below,
Commerce intends to select
respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S.
imports during the period of review. We
intend to release the CBP data under
Administrative Protective Order (APO)
to all parties having an APO within five
days of publication of the initiation
notice and to make our decision
regarding respondent selection within
21 days of publication of the initiation
Federal Register notice. Therefore, we
encourage all parties interested in
commenting on respondent selection to
submit their APO applications on the
date of publication of the initiation
notice, or as soon thereafter as possible.
Commerce invites comments regarding
the CBP data and respondent selection
within five days of placement of the
CBP data on the record of the review.
In the event Commerce decides it is
necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and
conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, Commerce finds that
determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be
‘‘collapsed’’ (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating
antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed
information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and
analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will
not conduct collapsing analyses at the
respondent selection phase of a review
and will not collapse companies at the
respondent selection phase unless there
has been a determination to collapse
certain companies in a previous
segment of this antidumping proceeding
(i.e., investigation, administrative
review, new shipper review or changed
circumstances review). For any
company subject to a review, if
Commerce determined, or continued to
treat, that company as collapsed with
Dated: June 25, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–14193 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty
Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request
Administrative Review
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482–4735.
AGENCY:
Background
Each year during the anniversary
month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as
defined in section 771(9) of the Tariff
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
39532
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices
others, Commerce will assume that such
companies continue to operate in the
same manner and will collapse them for
respondent selection purposes.
Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse
companies for purposes of respondent
selection. Parties are requested to (a)
identify which companies subject to
review previously were collapsed, and
(b) provide a citation to the proceeding
in which they were collapsed. Further,
if companies are requested to complete
a Quantity and Value Questionnaire for
purposes of respondent selection, in
general each company must report
volume and value data separately for
itself. Parties should not include data
for any other party, even if they believe
they should be treated as a single entity
with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or
companies in the most recently
completed segment of a proceeding
where Commerce considered collapsing
that entity, complete quantity and value
data for that collapsed entity must be
submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for
Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a
party that requests a review may
withdraw that request within 90 days of
the date of publication of the notice of
initiation of the requested review. The
regulation provides that Commerce may
extend this time if it is reasonable to do
so. Determinations by Commerce to
extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
Deadline for Particular Market
Situation Allegation
Section 504 of the Trade Preferences
Extension Act of 2015 amended the Act
by adding the concept of particular
market situation (PMS) for purposes of
constructed value under section 773(e)
of the Act.1 Section 773(e) of the Act
states that ‘‘if a particular market
situation exists such that the cost of
materials and fabrication or other
processing of any kind does not
accurately reflect the cost of production
in the ordinary course of trade, the
administering authority may use
another calculation methodology under
this subtitle or any other calculation
methodology.’’ When an interested
party submits a PMS allegation pursuant
to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce
will respond to such a submission
consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v).
If Commerce finds that a PMS exists
under section 773(e) of the Act, then it
will modify its dumping calculations
appropriately.
Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor
19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a deadline
for the submission of PMS allegations
and supporting factual information.
However, in order to administer section
773(e) of the Act, Commerce must
receive PMS allegations and supporting
factual information with enough time to
consider the submission. Thus, should
an interested party wish to submit a
PMS allegation and supporting new
factual information pursuant to section
773(e) of the Act, it must do so no later
than 20 days after submission of initial
Section D responses.
Opportunity To Request a Review: Not
later than the last day of July 2020,2
interested parties may request
administrative review of the following
orders, findings, or suspended
investigations, with anniversary dates in
July for the following periods:
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
BELGIUM: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts A–423–813 .....................................................................................................
COLOMBIA: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts A–301–803 ...................................................................................................
INDIA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A–533–863 .................................................................................................................
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A–533–875 ..................................................................................................................
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film A–533–824 .............................................................................................................
IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A–507–502 .........................................................................................................................................
ITALY:
Certain Pasta A–475–818 ....................................................................................................................................................
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A–475–832 .................................................................................................................
JAPAN:
Clad Steel Plate A–588–838 ................................................................................................................................................
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products A–588–873 .......................................................................................................................
Polyvinyl Alcohol A–588–861 ...............................................................................................................................................
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–588–845 ..........................................................................................................
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar A–588–876 ........................................................................................................................
MALAYSIA:
Steel Nails A–557–816 .........................................................................................................................................................
Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe A–557–815 .............................................................................................................
OMAN:
Steel Nails A–523–808 .........................................................................................................................................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A–580–878 .................................................................................................................
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A–580–893 ..................................................................................................................
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–580–834 ..........................................................................................................
Steel Nails A–580–874 .........................................................................................................................................................
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM:
Steel Nails A–552–818 .........................................................................................................................................................
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe A–552–816 ......................................................................................................................
TAIWAN:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A–583–856 .................................................................................................................
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A–583–860 ..................................................................................................................
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film A–583–837 .............................................................................................................
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in Coils A–583–831 ..........................................................................................................
Steel Nails A–583–854 .........................................................................................................................................................
THAILAND:
Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–549–807 ...............................................................................................................
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts A–549–833 .................................................................................................................
Weld Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe A–549–830 .................................................................................................................
1 See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015,
Public Law 114–27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01:53 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
2 Or the next business day, if the deadline falls
on a weekend, federal holiday or any other day
when Commerce is closed.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A–570–814 ...............................................................................................................
Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts A–570–962 .................................................................................................................
Certain Steel Grating A–570–947 ........................................................................................................................................
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe A–570–910 .....................................................................................................
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products A–570–029 .......................................................................................................................
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A–570–026 .................................................................................................................
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A–570–060 ..................................................................................................................
Persulfates A–570–847 ........................................................................................................................................................
Quartz Surface Products A–570–084 ..................................................................................................................................
Xanthan Gum A–570–985 ....................................................................................................................................................
TURKEY:
Certain Pasta A–489–805 ....................................................................................................................................................
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar A–489–829 ........................................................................................................................
UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods A–823–815 ....................................................................................................................
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
INDIA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C–533–864 .................................................................................................................
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film C–533–825 .............................................................................................................
ITALY:
Certain Pasta C–475–819 ....................................................................................................................................................
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C–475–833 .................................................................................................................
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C–580–879 ................................................................................
SOCIALIST OF REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Steel Nails C–552–819 ..........................................................................................
THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts C–570–963 .................................................................................................................
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel Pipe C–570–911 .....................................................................................................
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products C–570–030 .......................................................................................................................
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C–570–027 .................................................................................................................
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand C–570–946 .........................................................................................................
Quartz Surface Products C–570–085 ..................................................................................................................................
Steel Grating C–570–948 .....................................................................................................................................................
TURKEY:
Certain Pasta C–489–806 ....................................................................................................................................................
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar C–489–830 ........................................................................................................................
Suspension Agreements
39533
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
11/20/18—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
7/1/19—6/30/20
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
9/21/18—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
1/1/19—12/31/19
None.
In accordance with 19 CFR
351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may
request in writing that the Secretary
conduct an administrative review. For
both antidumping and countervailing
duty reviews, the interested party must
specify the individual producers or
exporters covered by an antidumping
finding or an antidumping or
countervailing duty order or suspension
agreement for which it is requesting a
review. In addition, a domestic
interested party or an interested party
described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary
to review those particular producers or
exporters. If the interested party intends
for the Secretary to review sales of
merchandise by an exporter (or a
producer if that producer also exports
merchandise from other suppliers)
which was produced in more than one
country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then
the interested party must state
specifically, on an order-by-order basis,
which exporter(s) the request is
intended to cover.
Note that, for any party Commerce
was unable to locate in prior segments,
Commerce will not accept a request for
an administrative review of that party
absent new information as to the party’s
location. Moreover, if the interested
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01:53 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
party who files a request for review is
unable to locate the producer or
exporter for which it requested the
review, the interested party must
provide an explanation of the attempts
it made to locate the producer or
exporter at the same time it files its
request for review, in order for the
Secretary to determine if the interested
party’s attempts were reasonable,
pursuant to 19 CFR 351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68
FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and NonMarket Economy Antidumping
Proceedings: Assessment of
Antidumping Duties, 76 FR 65694
(October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified
its practice with respect to the
collection of final antidumping duties
on imports of merchandise where
intermediate firms are involved. The
public should be aware of this
clarification in determining whether to
request an administrative review of
merchandise subject to antidumping
findings and orders.3
Commerce no longer considers the
non-market economy (NME) entity as an
exporter conditionally subject to an
antidumping duty administrative
3 See the Enforcement and Compliance website at
https://legacy.trade.gov/enforcement/.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
reviews.4 Accordingly, the NME entity
will not be under review unless
Commerce specifically receives a
request for, or self-initiates, a review of
the NME entity.5 In administrative
reviews of antidumping duty orders on
merchandise from NME countries where
a review of the NME entity has not been
initiated, but where an individual
exporter for which a review was
initiated does not qualify for a separate
rate, Commerce will issue a final
decision indicating that the company in
question is part of the NME entity.
However, in that situation, because no
review of the NME entity was
conducted, the NME entity’s entries
were not subject to the review and the
rate for the NME entity is not subject to
change as a result of that review
(although the rate for the individual
exporter may change as a function of the
finding that the exporter is part of the
NME entity). Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
4 See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement
of Change in Department Practice for Respondent
Selection in Antidumping Duty Proceedings and
Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy
Entity in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78
FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
5 In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties
should specify that they are requesting a review of
entries from exporters comprising the entity, and to
the extent possible, include the names of such
exporters in their request.
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
39534
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices
when there is no review requested of the
NME entity, Commerce will instruct
CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters
not named in the initiation notice,
including those that were suspended at
the NME entity rate.
All requests must be filed
electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS) on
Enforcement and Compliance’s ACCESS
website at https://access.trade.gov.6
Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request
must be served on the petitioner and
each exporter or producer specified in
the request. Note that Commerce has
temporarily modified certain of its
requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary
information, until July 17, 2020, unless
extended.7
Commerce will publish in the Federal
Register a notice of ‘‘Initiation of
Administrative Review of Antidumping
or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding,
or Suspended Investigation’’ for
requests received by the last day of July
2020. If Commerce does not receive, by
the last day of July 2020, a request for
review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation
listed in this notice and for the period
identified above, Commerce will
instruct CBP to assess antidumping or
countervailing duties on those entries at
a rate equal to the cash deposit of
estimated antidumping or
countervailing duties required on those
entries at the time of entry, or
withdrawal from warehouse, for
consumption and to continue to collect
the cash deposit previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of
any order, there will be no assessment
of antidumping or countervailing duties
on entries of subject merchandise
entered, or withdrawn from warehouse,
for consumption during the relevant
provisional-measures ‘‘gap’’ period of
the order, if such a gap period is
applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute
but is published as a service to the
international trading community.
6 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Proceedings: Electronic Filing Procedures;
Administrative Protective Order Procedures, 76 FR
39263 (July 6, 2011).
7 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19, 85 FR 29615 (May
18, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
01:53 Jul 01, 2020
Jkt 250001
Dated: June 19, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–14195 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
On April 24, 2020, Commerce tolled
deadlines in all administrative reviews
by 50 days, thereby extending the
deadline for these results until July 21,
2020.5 For details regarding the events
that occurred subsequent to the
initiation of the review, see the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum.6
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Scope of the Order
International Trade Administration
The product covered by this order is
emulsion styrene-butadiene rubber from
Korea. For a full description of the
scope, see the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum.
[A–580–890]
Emulsion Styrene-Butadiene Rubber
From the Republic of Korea:
Preliminary Results of the
Administrative Review of the
Antidumping Duty Order; 2018–2019
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) preliminarily finds that
sales of emulsion styrene butadiene
rubber (ESB rubber) from the Republic
of Korea (Korea) were made at less than
normal value during the period of
review (POR) September 1, 2018
through August 31, 2019. We invite
interested parties to comment on these
preliminary results.
DATES: Applicable July 1, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eliza Siordia, AD/CVD Operations,
Office V, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3878.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
AGENCY:
Background
On November 12, 2019, Commerce
initiated the administrative review of
the antidumping duty order on ESB
rubber from Korea in accordance with
section 751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930,
as amended (the Act).1 This review
covers seven producers/exporters of
subject merchandise.2 On December 13,
2019, Commerce selected LG Chem, Ltd.
(LG Chem) as the sole mandatory
respondent for this review.3 On January
13, 2020, LG Chem notified Commerce
that it would not participate in this
administrative review.4
1 See Initiation of Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 84 FR
61011 (November 12, 2019).
2 Id., 84 FR 61014.
3 See Memorandum, ‘‘Administrative Review of
the Antidumping Duty Order of Emulsion StyreneButadiene Rubber from the Republic of Korea:
Respondent Selection,’’ dated December 13, 2019.
4 See LG Chem’s Letter, ‘‘Emulsion StyreneButadiene Rubber (ESBR) from Korea: LG Chem’s
Decision to Stop Participating in AD Review,’’
dated January 13, 2020.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Methodology
Commerce is conducting this review
in accordance with section 751(a) of the
Act. Pursuant to section 776(a) and (b)
of the Act, Commerce has preliminarily
relied upon facts otherwise available
with adverse inferences (AFA) for LG
Chem, because this respondent notified
Commerce that it would not participate
in the review.
For a full description of the
methodology and analysis underlying
the preliminary application of AFA, see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum.
A list of topics included in the
Preliminary Decision Memorandum is
included as an appendix to this notice.
The Preliminary Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is made
available to the public via Enforcement
and Compliance’s Antidumping and
Countervailing Duty Centralized
Electronic Service System (ACCESS).
ACCESS is available to registered users
at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a
complete version of the Preliminary
Decision Memorandum can be accessed
directly at https://enforcement.trade.gov/
frn/. The signed and the electronic
versions of the Preliminary Decision
Memorandum are identical in content.
Rates for Non-Selected Companies
In accordance with the U.S. Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s
decision in Albemarle,7 we are applying
a rate based on the rate preliminarily
applied to LG Chem in this
administrative review (i.e., 44.30
percent) to the companies not selected
5 See Memorandum, ‘‘Tolling of Deadlines for
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Administrative Reviews in Response to Operational
Adjustments Due to COVID–19,’’ dated April 24,
2020.
6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Decision Memorandum for
the Preliminary Results of the Administrative
Review of the Antidumping Duty Order: Emulsion
Styrene-Butadiene Rubber from the Republic of
Korea; 2018–2019,’’ dated concurrently with, and
hereby adopted by, this notice (Preliminary
Decision Memorandum).
7 See Albemarle Corp. v. United States, 821 F. 3d
1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016) (Albemarle).
E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM
01JYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39531-39534]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14195]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
Antidumping or Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended
Investigation; Opportunity To Request Administrative Review
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda E. Brown, Office of AD/CVD
Operations, Customs Liaison Unit, Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230, telephone: (202) 482-
4735.
Background
Each year during the anniversary month of the publication of an
antidumping or countervailing duty order, finding, or suspended
investigation, an interested party, as defined in section 771(9) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), may request, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.213, that the Department of Commerce (Commerce) conduct
an administrative review of that antidumping or countervailing duty
order, finding, or suspended investigation.
All deadlines for the submission of comments or actions by Commerce
discussed below refer to the number of calendar days from the
applicable starting date.
Respondent Selection
In the event Commerce limits the number of respondents for
individual examination for administrative reviews initiated pursuant to
requests made for the orders identified below,
Commerce intends to select respondents based on U.S. Customs and
Border Protection (CBP) data for U.S. imports during the period of
review. We intend to release the CBP data under Administrative
Protective Order (APO) to all parties having an APO within five days of
publication of the initiation notice and to make our decision regarding
respondent selection within 21 days of publication of the initiation
Federal Register notice. Therefore, we encourage all parties interested
in commenting on respondent selection to submit their APO applications
on the date of publication of the initiation notice, or as soon
thereafter as possible. Commerce invites comments regarding the CBP
data and respondent selection within five days of placement of the CBP
data on the record of the review.
In the event Commerce decides it is necessary to limit individual
examination of respondents and conduct respondent selection under
section 777A(c)(2) of the Act:
In general, Commerce finds that determinations concerning whether
particular companies should be ``collapsed'' (i.e., treated as a single
entity for purposes of calculating antidumping duty rates) require a
substantial amount of detailed information and analysis, which often
require follow-up questions and analysis. Accordingly, Commerce will
not conduct collapsing analyses at the respondent selection phase of a
review and will not collapse companies at the respondent selection
phase unless there has been a determination to collapse certain
companies in a previous segment of this antidumping proceeding (i.e.,
investigation, administrative review, new shipper review or changed
circumstances review). For any company subject to a review, if Commerce
determined, or continued to treat, that company as collapsed with
[[Page 39532]]
others, Commerce will assume that such companies continue to operate in
the same manner and will collapse them for respondent selection
purposes. Otherwise, Commerce will not collapse companies for purposes
of respondent selection. Parties are requested to (a) identify which
companies subject to review previously were collapsed, and (b) provide
a citation to the proceeding in which they were collapsed. Further, if
companies are requested to complete a Quantity and Value Questionnaire
for purposes of respondent selection, in general each company must
report volume and value data separately for itself. Parties should not
include data for any other party, even if they believe they should be
treated as a single entity with that other party. If a company was
collapsed with another company or companies in the most recently
completed segment of a proceeding where Commerce considered collapsing
that entity, complete quantity and value data for that collapsed entity
must be submitted.
Deadline for Withdrawal of Request for Administrative Review
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.213(d)(1), a party that requests a review
may withdraw that request within 90 days of the date of publication of
the notice of initiation of the requested review. The regulation
provides that Commerce may extend this time if it is reasonable to do
so. Determinations by Commerce to extend the 90-day deadline will be
made on a case-by-case basis.
Deadline for Particular Market Situation Allegation
Section 504 of the Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015 amended
the Act by adding the concept of particular market situation (PMS) for
purposes of constructed value under section 773(e) of the Act.\1\
Section 773(e) of the Act states that ``if a particular market
situation exists such that the cost of materials and fabrication or
other processing of any kind does not accurately reflect the cost of
production in the ordinary course of trade, the administering authority
may use another calculation methodology under this subtitle or any
other calculation methodology.'' When an interested party submits a PMS
allegation pursuant to section 773(e) of the Act, Commerce will respond
to such a submission consistent with 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v). If
Commerce finds that a PMS exists under section 773(e) of the Act, then
it will modify its dumping calculations appropriately.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Trade Preferences Extension Act of 2015, Public Law 114-
27, 129 Stat. 362 (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Neither section 773(e) of the Act nor 19 CFR 351.301(c)(2)(v) set a
deadline for the submission of PMS allegations and supporting factual
information. However, in order to administer section 773(e) of the Act,
Commerce must receive PMS allegations and supporting factual
information with enough time to consider the submission. Thus, should
an interested party wish to submit a PMS allegation and supporting new
factual information pursuant to section 773(e) of the Act, it must do
so no later than 20 days after submission of initial Section D
responses.
Opportunity To Request a Review: Not later than the last day of
July 2020,\2\ interested parties may request administrative review of
the following orders, findings, or suspended investigations, with
anniversary dates in July for the following periods:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Or the next business day, if the deadline falls on a
weekend, federal holiday or any other day when Commerce is closed.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Antidumping Duty Proceedings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
BELGIUM: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate 7/1/19--6/30/20
Salts A-423-813.
COLOMBIA: Citric Acid and Certain Citrate 7/1/19--6/30/20
Salts A-301-803.
INDIA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
533-863.
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
533-875.
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
533-824.
IRAN: In-Shell Pistachios A-507-502........ 7/1/19--6/30/20
ITALY:
Certain Pasta A-475-818................ 7/1/19--6/30/20
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
475-832.
JAPAN:
Clad Steel Plate A-588-838............. 7/1/19--6/30/20
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products A-588- 7/1/19--6/30/20
873.
Polyvinyl Alcohol A-588-861............ 7/1/19--6/30/20
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 7/1/19--6/30/20
Coils A-588-845.
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar A-588- 7/1/19--6/30/20
876.
MALAYSIA:
Steel Nails A-557-816.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
Welded Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
557-815.
OMAN:
Steel Nails A-523-808.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
REPUBLIC OF KOREA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
580-878.
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
580-893.
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 7/1/19--6/30/20
Coils A-580-834.
Steel Nails A-580-874.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
SOCIALIST REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM:
Steel Nails A-552-818.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
Welded Stainless Pressure Pipe A-552- 7/1/19--6/30/20
816.
TAIWAN:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
583-856.
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
583-860.
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
583-837.
Stainless Steel Sheet and Strip in 7/1/19--6/30/20
Coils A-583-831.
Steel Nails A-583-854.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
THAILAND:
Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
549-807.
Citric Acid and Certain Citrate Salts A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
549-833.
Weld Stainless Steel Pressure Pipe A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
549-830.
[[Page 39533]]
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Carbon Steel Butt-Weld Pipe Fittings A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
570-814.
Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts A-570- 7/1/19--6/30/20
962.
Certain Steel Grating A-570-947........ 7/1/19--6/30/20
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel 7/1/19--6/30/20
Pipe A-570-910.
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products A-570- 7/1/19--6/30/20
029.
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
570-026.
Fine Denier Polyester Staple Fiber A- 7/1/19--6/30/20
570-060.
Persulfates A-570-847.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
Quartz Surface Products A-570-084...... 11/20/18--6/30/20
Xanthan Gum A-570-985.................. 7/1/19--6/30/20
TURKEY:
Certain Pasta A-489-805................ 7/1/19--6/30/20
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar A-489- 7/1/19--6/30/20
829.
UKRAINE: Oil Country Tubular Goods A-823- 7/1/19--6/30/20
815.
Countervailing Duty Proceedings
------------------------------------------------------------------------
INDIA:
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C- 1/1/19--12/31/19
533-864.
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film C- 1/1/19--12/31/19
533-825.
ITALY:
Certain Pasta C-475-819................ 1/1/19--12/31/19
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C- 1/1/19--12/31/19
475-833.
REPUBLIC OF KOREA: Corrosion-Resistant 1/1/19--12/31/19
Steel Products C-580-879.
SOCIALIST OF REPUBLIC OF VIETNAM: Steel 1/1/19--12/31/19
Nails C-552-819.
THE PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA:
Certain Potassium Phosphate Salts C-570- 1/1/19--12/31/19
963.
Circular Welded Carbon Quality Steel 1/1/19--12/31/19
Pipe C-570-911.
Cold-Rolled Steel Flat Products C-570- 1/1/19--12/31/19
030.
Corrosion-Resistant Steel Products C- 1/1/19--12/31/19
570-027.
Prestressed Concrete Steel Wire Strand 1/1/19--12/31/19
C-570-946.
Quartz Surface Products C-570-085...... 9/21/18--12/31/19
Steel Grating C-570-948................ 1/1/19--12/31/19
TURKEY:
Certain Pasta C-489-806................ 1/1/19--12/31/19
Steel Concrete Reinforcing Bar C-489- 1/1/19--12/31/19
830.
Suspension Agreements
------------------------------------------------------------------------
None.......................................
------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b), an interested party as
defined by section 771(9) of the Act may request in writing that the
Secretary conduct an administrative review. For both antidumping and
countervailing duty reviews, the interested party must specify the
individual producers or exporters covered by an antidumping finding or
an antidumping or countervailing duty order or suspension agreement for
which it is requesting a review. In addition, a domestic interested
party or an interested party described in section 771(9)(B) of the Act
must state why it desires the Secretary to review those particular
producers or exporters. If the interested party intends for the
Secretary to review sales of merchandise by an exporter (or a producer
if that producer also exports merchandise from other suppliers) which
was produced in more than one country of origin and each country of
origin is subject to a separate order, then the interested party must
state specifically, on an order-by-order basis, which exporter(s) the
request is intended to cover.
Note that, for any party Commerce was unable to locate in prior
segments, Commerce will not accept a request for an administrative
review of that party absent new information as to the party's location.
Moreover, if the interested party who files a request for review is
unable to locate the producer or exporter for which it requested the
review, the interested party must provide an explanation of the
attempts it made to locate the producer or exporter at the same time it
files its request for review, in order for the Secretary to determine
if the interested party's attempts were reasonable, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.303(f)(3)(ii).
As explained in Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003), and Non-
Market Economy Antidumping Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping
Duties, 76 FR 65694 (October 24, 2011), Commerce clarified its practice
with respect to the collection of final antidumping duties on imports
of merchandise where intermediate firms are involved. The public should
be aware of this clarification in determining whether to request an
administrative review of merchandise subject to antidumping findings
and orders.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ See the Enforcement and Compliance website at https://legacy.trade.gov/enforcement/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce no longer considers the non-market economy (NME) entity as
an exporter conditionally subject to an antidumping duty administrative
reviews.\4\ Accordingly, the NME entity will not be under review unless
Commerce specifically receives a request for, or self-initiates, a
review of the NME entity.\5\ In administrative reviews of antidumping
duty orders on merchandise from NME countries where a review of the NME
entity has not been initiated, but where an individual exporter for
which a review was initiated does not qualify for a separate rate,
Commerce will issue a final decision indicating that the company in
question is part of the NME entity. However, in that situation, because
no review of the NME entity was conducted, the NME entity's entries
were not subject to the review and the rate for the NME entity is not
subject to change as a result of that review (although the rate for the
individual exporter may change as a function of the finding that the
exporter is part of the NME entity). Following initiation of an
antidumping administrative review
[[Page 39534]]
when there is no review requested of the NME entity, Commerce will
instruct CBP to liquidate entries for all exporters not named in the
initiation notice, including those that were suspended at the NME
entity rate.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ See Antidumping Proceedings: Announcement of Change in
Department Practice for Respondent Selection in Antidumping Duty
Proceedings and Conditional Review of the Nonmarket Economy Entity
in NME Antidumping Duty Proceedings, 78 FR 65963 (November 4, 2013).
\5\ In accordance with 19 CFR 351.213(b)(1), parties should
specify that they are requesting a review of entries from exporters
comprising the entity, and to the extent possible, include the names
of such exporters in their request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
All requests must be filed electronically in Enforcement and
Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic
Service System (ACCESS) on Enforcement and Compliance's ACCESS website
at https://access.trade.gov.\6\ Further, in accordance with 19 CFR
351.303(f)(l)(i), a copy of each request must be served on the
petitioner and each exporter or producer specified in the request. Note
that Commerce has temporarily modified certain of its requirements for
serving documents containing business proprietary information, until
July 17, 2020, unless extended.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings:
Electronic Filing Procedures; Administrative Protective Order
Procedures, 76 FR 39263 (July 6, 2011).
\7\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID-19, 85 FR 29615 (May 18, 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commerce will publish in the Federal Register a notice of
``Initiation of Administrative Review of Antidumping or Countervailing
Duty Order, Finding, or Suspended Investigation'' for requests received
by the last day of July 2020. If Commerce does not receive, by the last
day of July 2020, a request for review of entries covered by an order,
finding, or suspended investigation listed in this notice and for the
period identified above, Commerce will instruct CBP to assess
antidumping or countervailing duties on those entries at a rate equal
to the cash deposit of estimated antidumping or countervailing duties
required on those entries at the time of entry, or withdrawal from
warehouse, for consumption and to continue to collect the cash deposit
previously ordered.
For the first administrative review of any order, there will be no
assessment of antidumping or countervailing duties on entries of
subject merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for
consumption during the relevant provisional-measures ``gap'' period of
the order, if such a gap period is applicable to the period of review.
This notice is not required by statute but is published as a
service to the international trading community.
Dated: June 19, 2020.
James Maeder,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020-14195 Filed 6-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P