Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Add the Consolidated Audit Trail Industry Member Compliance Rules to the List of Minor Rule Violations, 39649-39652 [2020-14119]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices technical changes which add clarity to the Rulebook and do not impose a burden on competition. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others No written comments were either solicited or received. III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i) Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 30 and Rule 19b– 4(f)(6) thereunder.31 A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the Act 32 normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 33 permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposed rule change may become operative upon filing. The Exchange states that waiver of the operative delay would be consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest because it would allow the Exchange to immediately increase its position and exercise limits for options on SPY to those of Cboe, which the Exchange believes will ensure fair competition among exchanges and provide consistency for Nasdaq Participants that are also members at Cboe where these increased position and exercise limits are currently in place. For this reason, the Commission believes that waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the 30 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A). 31 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b– 4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission. The Exchange has satisfied this requirement. 32 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). 33 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii). VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 39649 operative delay and designates the proposal as operative upon filing.34 At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved. business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2020–033, and should be submitted on or before July 22, 2020. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.35 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– NASDAQ–2020–033 on the subject line. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2020–033. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official 34 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission also has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). PO 00000 Frm 00131 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 [FR Doc. 2020–14113 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P [Release No. 34–89155; File No. SR–IEX– 2020–09] Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule Change To Add the Consolidated Audit Trail Industry Member Compliance Rules to the List of Minor Rule Violations June 25, 2020. Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ‘‘Act’’) 2 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,3 notice is hereby given that, on June 23, 2020, the Investors Exchange LLC (‘‘IEX’’ or the ‘‘Exchange’’) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and approving the proposal on an accelerated basis. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,4 and Rule 19b– 35 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 15 U.S.C. 78a. 3 17 CFR 240.19b–4. 4 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 1 15 E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 39650 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices 4 thereunder,5 IEX proposes to add the Consolidated Audit Trail (‘‘CAT’’) industry member compliance rules to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9.218. The Exchange requests accelerated approval and effectiveness of this filing. The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange’s website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such statements. A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Purpose of, and Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change 1. Purpose The Exchange proposes to add IEX’s CAT industry member compliance rules (the ‘‘CAT Compliance Rules’’) to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9.218.6 This proposal is based upon the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (‘‘FINRA’’) filing to amend FINRA Rule 9217 in order to add FINRA’s corresponding CAT Compliance Rules to FINRA’s list of rules that are eligible for minor rule violation plan treatment.7 Proposed Rule Change The Exchange adopted the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 11.600 in order to implement the National Market System Plan Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ‘‘CAT 5 17 CFR 240.19b–4. minor rule violation plan (‘‘MRVP’’) was declared effective by the Commission on August 3, 2016. See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 78474 (August 3, 2016), 81 FR 52717 (August 9, 2016) (File No. 4–701). 7 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88870 (May 14, 2020), 85 FR 30768 (May 20, 2020) (SR– FINRA–2020–013). The proposal is also based upon the New York Stock Exchange (‘‘NYSE’’) filing to amend NYSE Rule 9217 in order to add NYSE’s corresponding CAT Compliance Rules to NYSE’s list of rules that are eligible for MRVP treatment. See SR–NYSE–2020–51. 6 IEX’s VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’).8 The CAT NMS Plan was filed by the Plan Participants to comply with Rule 613 of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act,9 and each Plan Participant accordingly has adopted the same compliance rules in the Exchange’s Rule Series 11.600. The common CAT Compliance Rules adopted by each Plan Participant are designed to require industry members to comply with the provisions of the CAT NMS Plan, which broadly calls for industry members to record and report timely and accurately customer, order, and trade information relating to activity in NMS Securities and OTC Equity Securities. Rule 9.218 sets forth the list of rules under which a Member 10 or associated person may be subject to a fine under Rule 9.216(b). Rule 9.216(b) permits the Exchange to impose a fine of up to $2,500 on any Member or associated person for a minor violation of an eligible rule. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9.218 to add the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 11.600 to the list of rules in Rule 9.218 eligible for disposition pursuant to a minor fine under Rule 9.216(b).11 IEX is coordinating with FINRA and other Plan Participants to promote harmonized and consistent enforcement of all the Plan Participants’ CAT Compliance Rules. The Commission recently approved a Rule 17d–2 Plan under which the regulation of CAT Compliance Rules will be allocated among Plan Participants to reduce regulatory duplication for industry members that are members of more than one Participant (‘‘common members’’).12 Under the Rule 17d–2 Plan, the regulation of CAT Compliance Rules with respect to common members that are members of FINRA is allocated to FINRA. Similarly, under the Rule 17d– 2 Plan, responsibility for common members of multiple other Plan 8 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80256 (March 15, 2017), 82 FR 14526 (March 21, 2017). 9 17 CFR 242.613. 10 See Rule 1.160(s). 11 FINRA’s maximum fine for minor rule violations under FINRA Rule 9216(b) is also $2,500. Like FINRA, the Exchange, or FINRA on its behalf, would be able to pursue a fine greater than $2,500 for violations of the Rule Series 11.600 in a regular disciplinary proceeding or an acceptance, waiver, and consent (‘‘AWC’’) under Chapter 9 of the IEX Rule Book, as appropriate. Any fine imposed in excess of $2,500 or not otherwise covered by Rule 19d–1(c)(2) of the Act would be subject to prompt notice to the Commission pursuant to Rule 19d–1 under the Act. As noted below, in assessing the appropriateness of a minor rule fine with respect to CAT Compliance Rules, the Exchange will be guided by the same factors that FINRA utilizes. See text accompanying notes 13–14, infra. 12 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88366 (March 12, 2020), 85 FR 15238 (March 17, 2020) (File No. 4–618). PO 00000 Frm 00132 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Participants that are not members of FINRA will be allocated among those other Plan Participants, including to the Exchange. For those non-common members who are allocated to IEX pursuant to the Rule 17d–2 Plan, the Exchange and FINRA entered into a Regulatory Services Agreement (‘‘RSA’’) pursuant to which FINRA will conduct surveillance, investigation, examination, and enforcement activity in connection with the CAT Compliance Rules on the Exchange’s behalf. IEX understands that the other exchanges entered into similar RSAs with FINRA. FINRA, in connection with its amendment to FINRA Rule 9217 to make FINRA’s CAT Compliance Rules MRVP eligible, represented that it will apply MRVP fines for CAT Compliance Rules in the same manner that FINRA has for its similar existing audit trailrelated rules.13 Accordingly, in order to promote regulatory consistency, the Exchange, and FINRA acting on behalf of the Exchange, plan to do the same. Specifically, application of a MRVP fine with respect to CAT Compliance Rules will be guided by the same factors that FINRA referenced in its filing. However, more formal disciplinary proceedings may be warranted instead of minor rule dispositions in certain circumstances such as where violations prevent regulatory users of the CAT from performing their regulatory functions. Where minor rule dispositions are appropriate, the following factors help guide the determination of fine amounts: • Total number of reports that are not submitted or submitted late; • The timeframe over which the violations occur; • Whether violations are batched; • Whether the violations are the result of the actions of one individual or the result of faulty systems or procedures; • Whether the firm has taken remedial measures to correct the violations; • Prior minor rule violations within the past 24 months; • Collateral effects that the failure has on customers; and • Collateral effects that the failure has on the Exchange’s ability to perform its regulatory function.14 Upon effectiveness of this rule change, the Exchange will publish a regulatory bulletin notifying its 13 See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88870 (May 14, 2020), 85 FR 30768, 30768–69 (May 20, 2020) (SR–FINRA–2020–013); see also FINRA Notice to Members 04–19 (March 2004) (providing specific factors used to inform dispositions for violations of OATS reporting rules). 14 See supra note 13. E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices Members of the rule change and the specific factors that will be considered in connection with assessing minor rule fines described above. For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will result in a coordinated, harmonized approach to CAT compliance rule enforcement across Plan Participants that will be consistent with the approach FINRA has taken with the CAT rules. 2. Statutory Basis The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act,15 in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5),16 in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Minor rule fines provide a meaningful sanction for minor or technical violations of rules when the conduct at issue does not warrant stronger, immediately reportable disciplinary sanctions. The inclusion of a rule in the Exchange’s MRVP does not minimize the importance of compliance with the rule, nor does it preclude the Exchange from choosing to pursue violations of eligible rules through an AWC if the nature of the violations or prior disciplinary history warrants more significant sanctions. Rather, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change will strengthen the Exchange’s ability to carry out its oversight and enforcement responsibilities in cases where full disciplinary proceedings are unwarranted in view of the minor nature of the particular violation. Thus, the option to impose a minor rule sanction gives the Exchange additional flexibility to administer its enforcement program in the most effective and efficient manner while still fully meeting the Exchange’s remedial objectives in addressing violative conduct. Specifically, the proposed rule change is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices because it will provide the Exchange the ability to issue a minor rule fine for violations of the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 15 15 16 15 11.600 where a more formal disciplinary action may not be warranted or appropriate consistent with the approach of other Plan Participants for the same conduct, and thereby promote regulatory consistency across selfregulatory organizations The Exchange further believes that the proposed changes to Rule 9.218 are consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the Act,17 which provides that members and persons associated with members shall be appropriately disciplined for violation of the provisions of the rules of the exchange, by expulsion, suspension, limitation of activities, functions, and operations, fine, censure, being suspended or barred from being associated with a member, or any other fitting sanction. As noted, the proposed rule change would provide the Exchange ability to sanction minor or technical violations of the Rule Series 11.600 pursuant to the Exchange’s rules. Finally, the Exchange also believes that the proposed changes are designed to provide a fair procedure for the disciplining of members and persons associated with members, consistent with Sections 6(b)(7) and 6(d) of the Act.18 Rule 9.216 does not preclude a Member or associated person from contesting an alleged violation and receiving a hearing on the matter with the same procedural rights through a litigated disciplinary proceeding. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not intended to address competitive issues but rather is concerned solely with making the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 11.600 eligible for disposition pursuant to a MRVP, thereby strengthening the Exchange’s ability to carry out its oversight and enforcement functions and deter potential violative conduct. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. III. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule U.S.C. 78f(b). U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 17 15 18 15 Jkt 250001 PO 00000 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6). U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) and 78f(d). Frm 00133 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 39651 change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rule-comments@ sec.gov. Please include File Number SR– IEX–2020–09 on the subject line. Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–IEX–2020–09. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s internet website (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying information from comment submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–IEX–2020–09 and should be submitted on or before July 22, 2020. IV. Commission’s Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of Proposed Rule Change The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations thereunder applicable to a national securities E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1 39652 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 127 / Wednesday, July 1, 2020 / Notices exchange.19 In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,20 which requires that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments and to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The Commission also believes that the proposal is consistent with Sections 6(b)(1) and 6(b)(6) of the Act 21 which require that the rules of an exchange enforce compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline for, violations of Commission and Exchange rules. Finally, the Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the public interest, the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act, as required by Rule 19d– 1(c)(2) under the Act,22 which governs minor rule violation plans. As stated above, the Exchange proposes to add the CAT Compliance Rules to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9.218 to be consistent with the approach FINRA has taken for minor violations of its corresponding CAT Compliance Rules.23 The Commission has already approved FINRA’s treatment of CAT Compliance Rules violations when it approved the addition of CAT Compliance Rules to FINRA’s MRVP.24 As noted in that order, and similarly herein, the Commission believes that Exchange’s treatment of CAT Compliance Rules violations as part of its MRVP provides a reasonable means of addressing violations that do not rise to the level of requiring formal disciplinary proceedings, while providing greater flexibility in handling certain violations. However, the Commission expects that, as with FINRA, the Exchange will continue to conduct surveillance with due diligence 19 In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). 20 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5). 21 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6). 22 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2). 23 As discussed above, the Exchange has entered into a Rule 17d–2 Plan and an RSA with FINRA with respect to the CAT Compliance Rules. The Commission notes that, unless relieved by the Commission of its responsibility, as may be the case under the Rule 17d–2 Plan, the Exchange continues to bear the responsibility for self-regulatory conduct and liability for self-regulatory failures, not the selfregulatory organization retained to perform regulatory functions on the Exchange’s behalf pursuant to an RSA. See Securities Exchange Release No. 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 (February 1, 2010) (SR–BATS–2009–031), note 93 and accompanying text. 24 See supra note 7. VerDate Sep<11>2014 01:53 Jul 01, 2020 Jkt 250001 and make determinations based on its findings, on a case-by-case basis, regarding whether a sanction under the rule is appropriate, or whether a violation requires formal disciplinary action. Accordingly, the Commission believes the proposal raises no novel or significant issues. For the same reasons discussed above, the Commission finds good cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,25 for approving the proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of publication of the notice of the filing thereof in the Federal Register. The proposal merely adds the CAT Compliance Rules to the Exchange’s MRVP and harmonizes its application with FINRA’s application of CAT Compliance Rules under its own MRVP. Accordingly, the Commission believes that a full notice-and-comment period is not necessary before approving the proposal. V. Conclusion It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 26 and Rule 19d–1(c)(2) thereunder,27 that the proposed rule change (SR–IEX–2020– 09) be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis. For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.28 J. Matthew DeLesDernier, Assistant Secretary. [FR Doc. 2020–14119 Filed 6–30–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION [Investment Company Act Release No. 33913; File No. 812–15072] Conversus StepStone Private Markets, et al. June 25, 2020. Securities and Exchange Commission (‘‘Commission’’). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice of application for an order under section 17(d) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the ‘‘Act’’) and rule 17d–1 under the Act to permit certain joint transactions otherwise prohibited by section 17(d) of the Act and rule 17d–1 under the Act. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION: Applicants request an order to permit certain closed-end management investment PO 00000 25 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). U.S.C. 78s(b)(2). 27 17 CFR 240.19d–1(c)(2). 28 17 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 26 15 Frm 00134 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 companies to co-invest in portfolio companies with each other and with affiliated investment funds. APPLICANTS: Conversus StepStone Private Markets (‘‘Conversus Fund’’ or the ‘‘Existing Regulated Entity’’); StepStone Conversus LLC (‘‘StepStone Conversus’’); StepStone Group LP (‘‘StepStone Group’’); 2006 CoInvestment Portfolio, L.P., 2007 CoInvestment Portfolio, L.P., 2008 CoInvestment Portfolio, L.P., Asia Enterprise II Offshore L.P., Asia Enterprise II Onshore LLC, Capitol Private Opportunities II (Parallel) LP, Capitol Private Opportunities II LP, Capitol Private Opportunities III (Parallel) LP, Capitol Private Opportunities III LP, Capitol Private Opportunities LP, CGR/PE, LLC, Europe Enterprise II Offshore, L.P., Europe Enterprise II Offshore, L.P., Europe Enterprise III Offshore L.P., Europe Enterprise III Onshore L.P., Latin America Opportunities (Delaware) L.P., Latin America Opportunities L.P., Lexington C/RE, LLC, Masters IV Cayman Holdings, L.P., MBKP North Asian Opportunities Partners Offshore L.P., Mezzanine Co-Investment Portfolio, L.P., NYSCRF Pioneer Opportunities Fund A, L.P., NYSCRF Pioneer Partnership Fund B, L.P., Pegasus Multi-Strategy Series (A) LP, Real Estate Domestic Partnership Fund I, L.P., Real Estate Global Partnership Fund II, L.P., Real Estate International Partnership Fund I, L.P., Silverstone I, LLC, Silverstone II, LLC—Series A, Silverstone II, LLC—Series B, Silverstone II, LLC—Series C, Silverstone II, LLC—Series D, Silverstone II, LLC—Series E, Silverstone II, LLC—Series F, Silverstone II, LLC—Series G, Silverstone II, LLC—Series H, Silverstone II, LLC—Series I, Silverstone II, LLC—Series J, Silverstone II, LLC— Series K (Class 1), Silverstone II, LLC— Series K (Class 2), Silverstone III, L.P., SIMA Private Equity 6 GmbH & Co. KG, SRE Care—Investco, L.P., SRE Colt Devco—Investco, L.P., SRE Colt Opco— Investco, L.P., SRE Curator—Investco, L.P., SRE Curator-TS, LP, SRE Encore— Investco, L.P., SRE Freyja—Investco, L.P., SRE Hasso—Investco, L.P., SRE Magnesia—Investco, L.P., SRE Maple Direct Investco, LP, SRE Maple REIT Investco, LP, SRE Panther—Investco, L.P., SRE Preservation—Investco, L.P., SRE Ripple—Investco LP, SRE Stern Debt—Investco, L.P., SRE Stern Equity—Investco, L.P., SREP III COLT OPCO REIT, LLC, SREP III Flight— Investco, L.P., StepStone A Opportunities Fund, L.P., StepStone Aegon Opportunities Fund, LP.—Series E:\FR\FM\01JYN1.SGM 01JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 127 (Wednesday, July 1, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39649-39652]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-14119]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

[Release No. 34-89155; File No. SR-IEX-2020-09]


Self-Regulatory Organizations; Investors Exchange LLC; Notice of 
Filing and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of a Proposed Rule 
Change To Add the Consolidated Audit Trail Industry Member Compliance 
Rules to the List of Minor Rule Violations

June 25, 2020.
    Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) \1\ of the Securities Exchange Act of 
1934 (the ``Act'') \2\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\3\ notice is hereby 
given that, on June 23, 2020, the Investors Exchange LLC (``IEX'' or 
the ``Exchange'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission 
(the ``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I 
and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory 
organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit 
comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons and 
approving the proposal on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \2\ 15 U.S.C. 78a.
    \3\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance 
of the Proposed Rule Change

    Pursuant to the provisions of Section 19(b)(1) under the Act,\4\ 
and Rule 19b-

[[Page 39650]]

4 thereunder,\5\ IEX proposes to add the Consolidated Audit Trail 
(``CAT'') industry member compliance rules to the list of minor rule 
violations in Rule 9.218. The Exchange requests accelerated approval 
and effectiveness of this filing.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \4\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
    \5\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The text of the proposed rule change is available at the Exchange's 
website at www.iextrading.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, 
and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.

II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

    In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization 
included statements concerning the purpose of and basis for the 
proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the 
proposed rule change. The text of these statements may be examined at 
the places specified in Item IV below. The self-regulatory organization 
has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the 
most significant aspects of such statements.

A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and 
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change

1. Purpose
    The Exchange proposes to add IEX's CAT industry member compliance 
rules (the ``CAT Compliance Rules'') to the list of minor rule 
violations in Rule 9.218.\6\ This proposal is based upon the Financial 
Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (``FINRA'') filing to amend FINRA 
Rule 9217 in order to add FINRA's corresponding CAT Compliance Rules to 
FINRA's list of rules that are eligible for minor rule violation plan 
treatment.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ IEX's minor rule violation plan (``MRVP'') was declared 
effective by the Commission on August 3, 2016. See Securities 
Exchange Act Release No. 78474 (August 3, 2016), 81 FR 52717 (August 
9, 2016) (File No. 4-701).
    \7\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88870 (May 14, 
2020), 85 FR 30768 (May 20, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-013). The proposal 
is also based upon the New York Stock Exchange (``NYSE'') filing to 
amend NYSE Rule 9217 in order to add NYSE's corresponding CAT 
Compliance Rules to NYSE's list of rules that are eligible for MRVP 
treatment. See SR-NYSE-2020-51.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Proposed Rule Change
    The Exchange adopted the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 
11.600 in order to implement the National Market System Plan Governing 
the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ``CAT NMS Plan'' or ``Plan'').\8\ The 
CAT NMS Plan was filed by the Plan Participants to comply with Rule 613 
of Regulation NMS under the Exchange Act,\9\ and each Plan Participant 
accordingly has adopted the same compliance rules in the Exchange's 
Rule Series 11.600. The common CAT Compliance Rules adopted by each 
Plan Participant are designed to require industry members to comply 
with the provisions of the CAT NMS Plan, which broadly calls for 
industry members to record and report timely and accurately customer, 
order, and trade information relating to activity in NMS Securities and 
OTC Equity Securities.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \8\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 80256 (March 15, 
2017), 82 FR 14526 (March 21, 2017).
    \9\ 17 CFR 242.613.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Rule 9.218 sets forth the list of rules under which a Member \10\ 
or associated person may be subject to a fine under Rule 9.216(b). Rule 
9.216(b) permits the Exchange to impose a fine of up to $2,500 on any 
Member or associated person for a minor violation of an eligible rule. 
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 9.218 to add the CAT Compliance 
Rules in the Rule Series 11.600 to the list of rules in Rule 9.218 
eligible for disposition pursuant to a minor fine under Rule 
9.216(b).\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ See Rule 1.160(s).
    \11\ FINRA's maximum fine for minor rule violations under FINRA 
Rule 9216(b) is also $2,500. Like FINRA, the Exchange, or FINRA on 
its behalf, would be able to pursue a fine greater than $2,500 for 
violations of the Rule Series 11.600 in a regular disciplinary 
proceeding or an acceptance, waiver, and consent (``AWC'') under 
Chapter 9 of the IEX Rule Book, as appropriate. Any fine imposed in 
excess of $2,500 or not otherwise covered by Rule 19d-1(c)(2) of the 
Act would be subject to prompt notice to the Commission pursuant to 
Rule 19d-1 under the Act. As noted below, in assessing the 
appropriateness of a minor rule fine with respect to CAT Compliance 
Rules, the Exchange will be guided by the same factors that FINRA 
utilizes. See text accompanying notes 13-14, infra.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    IEX is coordinating with FINRA and other Plan Participants to 
promote harmonized and consistent enforcement of all the Plan 
Participants' CAT Compliance Rules. The Commission recently approved a 
Rule 17d-2 Plan under which the regulation of CAT Compliance Rules will 
be allocated among Plan Participants to reduce regulatory duplication 
for industry members that are members of more than one Participant 
(``common members'').\12\ Under the Rule 17d-2 Plan, the regulation of 
CAT Compliance Rules with respect to common members that are members of 
FINRA is allocated to FINRA. Similarly, under the Rule 17d-2 Plan, 
responsibility for common members of multiple other Plan Participants 
that are not members of FINRA will be allocated among those other Plan 
Participants, including to the Exchange. For those non-common members 
who are allocated to IEX pursuant to the Rule 17d-2 Plan, the Exchange 
and FINRA entered into a Regulatory Services Agreement (``RSA'') 
pursuant to which FINRA will conduct surveillance, investigation, 
examination, and enforcement activity in connection with the CAT 
Compliance Rules on the Exchange's behalf. IEX understands that the 
other exchanges entered into similar RSAs with FINRA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \12\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88366 (March 12, 
2020), 85 FR 15238 (March 17, 2020) (File No. 4-618).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    FINRA, in connection with its amendment to FINRA Rule 9217 to make 
FINRA's CAT Compliance Rules MRVP eligible, represented that it will 
apply MRVP fines for CAT Compliance Rules in the same manner that FINRA 
has for its similar existing audit trail-related rules.\13\ 
Accordingly, in order to promote regulatory consistency, the Exchange, 
and FINRA acting on behalf of the Exchange, plan to do the same. 
Specifically, application of a MRVP fine with respect to CAT Compliance 
Rules will be guided by the same factors that FINRA referenced in its 
filing. However, more formal disciplinary proceedings may be warranted 
instead of minor rule dispositions in certain circumstances such as 
where violations prevent regulatory users of the CAT from performing 
their regulatory functions. Where minor rule dispositions are 
appropriate, the following factors help guide the determination of fine 
amounts:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \13\ See Securities Exchange Act Release No. 88870 (May 14, 
2020), 85 FR 30768, 30768-69 (May 20, 2020) (SR-FINRA-2020-013); see 
also FINRA Notice to Members 04-19 (March 2004) (providing specific 
factors used to inform dispositions for violations of OATS reporting 
rules).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

     Total number of reports that are not submitted or 
submitted late;
     The timeframe over which the violations occur;
     Whether violations are batched;
     Whether the violations are the result of the actions of 
one individual or the result of faulty systems or procedures;
     Whether the firm has taken remedial measures to correct 
the violations;
     Prior minor rule violations within the past 24 months;
     Collateral effects that the failure has on customers; and
     Collateral effects that the failure has on the Exchange's 
ability to perform its regulatory function.\14\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \14\ See supra note 13.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Upon effectiveness of this rule change, the Exchange will publish a 
regulatory bulletin notifying its

[[Page 39651]]

Members of the rule change and the specific factors that will be 
considered in connection with assessing minor rule fines described 
above.
    For the foregoing reasons, the Exchange believes that the proposed 
rule change will result in a coordinated, harmonized approach to CAT 
compliance rule enforcement across Plan Participants that will be 
consistent with the approach FINRA has taken with the CAT rules.
2. Statutory Basis
    The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the 
Act,\15\ in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 
6(b)(5),\16\ in particular, because it is designed to prevent 
fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination 
with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to 
remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open 
market and a national market system and, in general, to protect 
investors and the public interest.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
    \16\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Minor rule fines provide a meaningful sanction for minor or 
technical violations of rules when the conduct at issue does not 
warrant stronger, immediately reportable disciplinary sanctions. The 
inclusion of a rule in the Exchange's MRVP does not minimize the 
importance of compliance with the rule, nor does it preclude the 
Exchange from choosing to pursue violations of eligible rules through 
an AWC if the nature of the violations or prior disciplinary history 
warrants more significant sanctions. Rather, the Exchange believes that 
the proposed rule change will strengthen the Exchange's ability to 
carry out its oversight and enforcement responsibilities in cases where 
full disciplinary proceedings are unwarranted in view of the minor 
nature of the particular violation. Thus, the option to impose a minor 
rule sanction gives the Exchange additional flexibility to administer 
its enforcement program in the most effective and efficient manner 
while still fully meeting the Exchange's remedial objectives in 
addressing violative conduct. Specifically, the proposed rule change is 
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices 
because it will provide the Exchange the ability to issue a minor rule 
fine for violations of the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 
11.600 where a more formal disciplinary action may not be warranted or 
appropriate consistent with the approach of other Plan Participants for 
the same conduct, and thereby promote regulatory consistency across 
self-regulatory organizations
    The Exchange further believes that the proposed changes to Rule 
9.218 are consistent with Section 6(b)(6) of the Act,\17\ which 
provides that members and persons associated with members shall be 
appropriately disciplined for violation of the provisions of the rules 
of the exchange, by expulsion, suspension, limitation of activities, 
functions, and operations, fine, censure, being suspended or barred 
from being associated with a member, or any other fitting sanction. As 
noted, the proposed rule change would provide the Exchange ability to 
sanction minor or technical violations of the Rule Series 11.600 
pursuant to the Exchange's rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \17\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Finally, the Exchange also believes that the proposed changes are 
designed to provide a fair procedure for the disciplining of members 
and persons associated with members, consistent with Sections 6(b)(7) 
and 6(d) of the Act.\18\ Rule 9.216 does not preclude a Member or 
associated person from contesting an alleged violation and receiving a 
hearing on the matter with the same procedural rights through a 
litigated disciplinary proceeding.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \18\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(7) and 78f(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition

    IEX does not believe that the proposed rule change will result in 
any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in 
furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed rule change is not 
intended to address competitive issues but rather is concerned solely 
with making the CAT Compliance Rules in the Rule Series 11.600 eligible 
for disposition pursuant to a MRVP, thereby strengthening the 
Exchange's ability to carry out its oversight and enforcement functions 
and deter potential violative conduct.

C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed 
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others

    Written comments were neither solicited nor received.

III. Solicitation of Comments

    Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and 
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule 
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of 
the following methods:

Electronic Comments

     Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
     Send an email to [email protected]. Please include 
File Number SR-IEX-2020-09 on the subject line.

Paper Comments

     Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities 
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.

All submissions should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2020-09. This file 
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help 
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, 
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on 
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). 
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written 
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with 
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed 
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those 
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions 
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in 
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 
20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection 
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments 
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are 
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying 
information from comment submissions. You should submit only 
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions 
should refer to File Number SR-IEX-2020-09 and should be submitted on 
or before July 22, 2020.

IV. Commission's Findings and Order Granting Accelerated Approval of 
Proposed Rule Change

    The Commission finds that the proposed rule change is consistent 
with the requirements of the Act and the rules and regulations 
thereunder applicable to a national securities

[[Page 39652]]

exchange.\19\ In particular, the Commission finds that the proposed 
rule change is consistent with Section 6(b)(5) of the Act,\20\ which 
requires that the rules of an exchange be designed to promote just and 
equitable principles of trade, to remove impediments and to perfect the 
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, 
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. The 
Commission also believes that the proposal is consistent with Sections 
6(b)(1) and 6(b)(6) of the Act \21\ which require that the rules of an 
exchange enforce compliance with, and provide appropriate discipline 
for, violations of Commission and Exchange rules. Finally, the 
Commission finds that the proposal is consistent with the public 
interest, the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of 
the purposes of the Act, as required by Rule 19d-1(c)(2) under the 
Act,\22\ which governs minor rule violation plans.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \19\ In approving this proposed rule change, the Commission has 
considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, 
and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
    \20\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
    \21\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(1) and 78f(b)(6).
    \22\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    As stated above, the Exchange proposes to add the CAT Compliance 
Rules to the list of minor rule violations in Rule 9.218 to be 
consistent with the approach FINRA has taken for minor violations of 
its corresponding CAT Compliance Rules.\23\ The Commission has already 
approved FINRA's treatment of CAT Compliance Rules violations when it 
approved the addition of CAT Compliance Rules to FINRA's MRVP.\24\ As 
noted in that order, and similarly herein, the Commission believes that 
Exchange's treatment of CAT Compliance Rules violations as part of its 
MRVP provides a reasonable means of addressing violations that do not 
rise to the level of requiring formal disciplinary proceedings, while 
providing greater flexibility in handling certain violations. However, 
the Commission expects that, as with FINRA, the Exchange will continue 
to conduct surveillance with due diligence and make determinations 
based on its findings, on a case-by-case basis, regarding whether a 
sanction under the rule is appropriate, or whether a violation requires 
formal disciplinary action. Accordingly, the Commission believes the 
proposal raises no novel or significant issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \23\ As discussed above, the Exchange has entered into a Rule 
17d-2 Plan and an RSA with FINRA with respect to the CAT Compliance 
Rules. The Commission notes that, unless relieved by the Commission 
of its responsibility, as may be the case under the Rule 17d-2 Plan, 
the Exchange continues to bear the responsibility for self-
regulatory conduct and liability for self-regulatory failures, not 
the self-regulatory organization retained to perform regulatory 
functions on the Exchange's behalf pursuant to an RSA. See 
Securities Exchange Release No. 61419 (January 26, 2010), 75 FR 5157 
(February 1, 2010) (SR-BATS-2009-031), note 93 and accompanying 
text.
    \24\ See supra note 7.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    For the same reasons discussed above, the Commission finds good 
cause, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act,\25\ for approving the 
proposed rule change prior to the thirtieth day after the date of 
publication of the notice of the filing thereof in the Federal 
Register. The proposal merely adds the CAT Compliance Rules to the 
Exchange's MRVP and harmonizes its application with FINRA's application 
of CAT Compliance Rules under its own MRVP. Accordingly, the Commission 
believes that a full notice-and-comment period is not necessary before 
approving the proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \25\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

V. Conclusion

    It is therefore ordered, pursuant to Section 19(b)(2) of the Act 
\26\ and Rule 19d-1(c)(2) thereunder,\27\ that the proposed rule change 
(SR-IEX-2020-09) be, and hereby is, approved on an accelerated basis.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \26\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(2).
    \27\ 17 CFR 240.19d-1(c)(2).

    For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, 
pursuant to delegated authority.\28\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \28\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-14119 Filed 6-30-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P


This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.