Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend Rule 6.1 in Order To Provide for a Consistent Documentation of Open Outcry Execution Information in the Event of an Exchange System Malfunction or Disruption, 39019-39021 [2020-13872]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 125 / Monday, June 29, 2020 / Notices
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89128; File No. SR–CBOE–
2020–053]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing and
Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed
Rule Change To Amend Rule 6.1 in
Order To Provide for a Consistent
Documentation of Open Outcry
Execution Information in the Event of
an Exchange System Malfunction or
Disruption
June 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 10,
2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe Options’’) filed
with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the ‘‘Commission’’) the
proposed rule change as described in
Items I, and II below, which Items have
been prepared by the Exchange. The
Exchange filed the proposal as a ‘‘noncontroversial’’ proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of
the Act 3 and Rule 19b–4(f)(6)
thereunder.4 The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.1 in order to provide for a
consistent documentation of open
outcry execution information in the
event of an Exchange system
malfunction or disruption.
The text of the proposed rule change
is also available on the Exchange’s
website (https://www.cboe.com/About
CBOE/CBOELegalRegulatory
Home.aspx), at the Exchange’s Office of
the Secretary, and at the Commission’s
Public Reference Room.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
II. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
In its filing with the Commission, the
Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for
the proposed rule change and discussed
any comments it received on the
proposed rule change. The text of these
statements may be examined at the
1 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
CFR 240.19b–4.
3 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
4 17 CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
2 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:25 Jun 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
places specified in Item IV below. The
Exchange has prepared summaries, set
forth in sections A, B, and C below, of
the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule
Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend
Rule 6.1 in order to provide for a
consistent documentation of open
outcry execution information in the
event of an Exchange system
malfunction or disruption.
Specifically, Rule 6.1(a) requires that
a Trading Permit Holder (‘‘TPH’’) in
each transaction to be designated by the
Exchange must report or ensure the
transaction is reported to the Exchange
within 90 seconds of the execution in a
form and manner prescribed by the
Exchange so that the trade information
may be reported to time and sales
reports.5 Pursuant to Rule 6.1(c)(1), the
seller (or buyer if designated by the
Exchange) must submit the transaction
report through an electronic data
transmission link approved by the
Exchange in order to fulfill the Rule
6.1(a) reporting requirement.
Additionally, Rule 6.1(c) provides that
participants (both the buyer and the
seller) must immediately record on a
card or ticket or enter in an electronic
data storage medium acceptable to the
Exchange certain requisite transaction
information. Such transaction
information includes, among other
things, the time of the transaction
obtained from a source designated by
the Exchange,6 and must be included in
the transaction report. Currently, TPHs
submit transaction reports through
Public Automated Routing System
(‘‘PAR’’) 7 workstations. In practice,
generally, when an order is executed in
open outcry, a participant nearly
contemporaneously with the execution
enters the requisite trade information
into a PAR workstation, including the
transaction time and presses a ‘‘trade’’
button, which both reports the trade to
the Exchange and constitutes the entry
of requisite trade information in an
electronic data storage medium
pursuant to Rule 6.1(c).
Rule 6.1(a) currently allows for
designated late reporting, however, a
5 The Exchange notes that for trades executed
electronically through the System, trade
information is immediately submitted to the
Exchange so that it may be reported to the tape.
6 The Exchange notes that there are universal
clocks on the trading floor which brokers may use
when recording outage reports.
7 See Rule 5.82.
PO 00000
Frm 00180
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
39019
pattern or practice of late reporting
without exceptional circumstances may
be considered conduct inconsistent with
just and equitable principles of trade
and subject to fines or discipline under
Exchange Rules.8 Therefore, in the event
an Exchange system experiences a
malfunction or disruption so that a
participant is unable to electronically
submit the requisite transaction
information and report open outcry
transaction information within the 90
second window (i.e. an ‘‘outage’’), a late
reporting designation is considered
acceptable and the participant is able to
electronically submit the trade
information and simultaneously report
the transaction upon resolution of the
malfunction or disruption and
resumption of the impacted Exchange
system. Although pursuant to Rule
6.1(c), a participant is able to record the
transaction information on a card or
ticket, and may currently do so in the
case of an outage (and following the
outage is then able to electronically
enter the trade information and submit
the transaction report), the Exchange
Rules do not currently provide for a
specific manner and form in which a
participant should report transaction
information, including the transaction
time, in the event that an outage
impedes a participant’s ability to submit
an electronic transaction record within
the required time period.9 As such, the
Exchange now proposes to amend Rule
6.1(a) to provide additional clarity and
consistency regarding the
documentation and submission of
transaction reports for open outcry
executions that occur during an outage.
Specifically, the proposed change
adopts subparagraph (a)(2) 10 to Rule
6.1, which provides that in the event of
an Exchange system malfunction or
disruption such that a participant is
unable to electronically report trade
information pursuant to subparagraph
(c) of Rule 6.1 for orders executed in
open outcry (an ‘‘outage’’), a participant
8 See also Rule 6.1(j)(2), which provides that in
the event a Clearing Trading Permit Holder attempts
to send trade information by electronic
transmission but is unable to get through to the
Exchange computer system, the Clearing Trading
Permit Holder may contact the Exchange’s Trade
Desk Department to inquire if the Exchange’s
system is ready to receive such Clearing Trading
Permit Holder’s transmission.
9 In connection with past outages, participants
have reported this information to the Exchange, but
have done so in different manners. The proposed
rule change will require participants to report this
information to the Exchange in the same manner as
designated by the Exchange.
10 The proposed change also separates the late
reporting provisions in current Rule 6.1(a) into
subparagraph (a)(1) (and titles the proposed
subparagraph ‘‘Late Reports’’) for formatting
consistency and ease of reading and following Rule
6.1(a) generally.
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
39020
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 125 / Monday, June 29, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
will record execution information,
including the transaction time, for
orders executed in open outcry in a
manner and form determined by the
Exchange. Upon the resolution of the
outage, a participant must resume
electronic submission of transaction
reports within the 90 second time frame
and must use best efforts to input
electronically into the Exchange’s
system the execution information
required by subparagraph (c) of Rule 6.1
for the order(s) executed in open outcry
during the outage not later than the
close of business on the day that the
malfunction or disruption ceases.
By providing that the Exchange
determines the manner and form that
participants must report transaction
information for executions that occur
during an outage,11 the proposed rule
change will provide for consistency
among all participants with respect to
their electronic submission of
transaction reports to the Exchange after
the system malfunction or disruption is
resolved. The proposed rule will also
provide additional clarity in the Rules
regarding the procedure participants
must use to submit transaction
information to the Exchange following
the resolution of an outage. A uniform
approach will also provide for more
consistency of information in the
Exchange’s audit trail.
The Exchange also notes that a similar
process is currently in place pursuant to
the Exchange Rules in the event of a
malfunction or disruption of the
Exchange’s systems such that a Trading
Permit Holder is unable to systematize
an order, wherein each order
transmitted to the Exchange during a
malfunction or disruption of the
Exchange’s systems must be recorded
legibly in a written form that has been
approved by the Exchange,12 and the
Trading Permit Holder receiving such
order must record the time of its receipt
on the floor and legibly record the terms
of the order, in written form.13 Such
rules also permit the retroactive entry of
order receipt information following the
cessation of the malfunction or
disruption.
11 Pursuant to Rule 1.5, the Exchange will
announce its determination of the manner and form
via: (1) Specifications, Notices, or Regulatory
Circulars with appropriate advanced notice, which
are posted on the Exchange’s website, or as
otherwise provided in the Rules; (2) electronic
message; or (3) other communication method as
provided in the Rules.
12 The Exchange notes that a legible record is a
manner in which it intends to determine that a
participant will be required to record execution
information upon an outage, as proposed.
13 See Rule 5.7(f)(2)(C)(i).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:25 Jun 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed
rule change is consistent with the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
‘‘Act’’) and the rules and regulations
thereunder applicable to the Exchange
and, in particular, the requirements of
Section 6(b) of the Act.14 Specifically,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Section
6(b)(5) 15 requirements that the rules of
an exchange be designed to prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
practices, to promote just and equitable
principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged
in regulating, clearing, settling,
processing information with respect to,
and facilitating transactions in
securities, to remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and a national market
system, and, in general, to protect
investors and the public interest.
Additionally, the Exchange believes the
proposed rule change is consistent with
the Section 6(b)(5) 16 requirement that
the rules of an exchange not be designed
to permit unfair discrimination between
customers, issuers, brokers, or dealers.
In particular, by requiring participants
to report open outcry transaction
information for orders executed during
an outage in a specific manner and form
determined by the Exchange, the
Exchange believes that the proposed
rule change will remove impediments to
and perfect the mechanism of a free and
open market and national market system
and help to ensure the maintenance of
a fair and orderly market, thereby
protecting investors, as it provides for
consistency and additional clarity
regarding the documentation and form
of submission of transaction information
for open outcry executions that occur
during an outage, and the form of the
reports of that information to the
Exchange following resolution of the
outage. The Exchange further believes
the proposed rule change may prevent
fraudulent and manipulative acts and
otherwise promote just and equitable
principles of trade. Particularly, the
proposed rule change will require a
uniform approach to the documentation
and reporting procedures of transaction
information for orders executed during
an outage, which will provide for
consistency in the Exchange’s audit
trail.
The Exchange does not believe that
documentation of certain trade
information in a manner and form
determined by the Exchange and the
14 15
15 15
U.S.C. 78f(b).
U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
16 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00181
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
procedure regarding retroactive
submission of certain trade information
in the event of a system malfunction or
disruption would present any new or
novel issues or reporting policies for
participants, as similar procedures are
already in place under the Exchange
Rules in the event a system malfunction
or disruption results in participants’
inability to systematize their orders
upon receipt.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose
any burden on competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act. The
Exchange does not believe that the
proposed rule change will impose any
burden on intramarket competition that
is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act
because it would apply equally to all
participants. In addition, the Exchange
does not believe that the proposed rule
change will impose any burden on
intermarket competition that is not
necessary or appropriate in furtherance
of the purposes of the Act because the
proposed rule change is not competitive
in nature nor does it relate to trading on
the Exchange. Rather, it relates solely to
the manner and form of reporting
transaction information to the Exchange
in outage scenarios.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement on Comments on the
Proposed Rule Change Received From
Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor
received comments on the proposed
rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the
Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule
change does not: (i) Significantly affect
the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant
burden on competition; and (iii) become
operative for 30 days from the date on
which it was filed, or such shorter time
as the Commission may designate, it has
become effective pursuant to Section
19(b)(3)(A) of the Act 17 and Rule 19b–
4(f)(6) thereunder.18
17 15
U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b–
4(f)(6)(iii) requires a self-regulatory organization to
give the Commission written notice of its intent to
file the proposed rule change, along with a brief
description and text of the proposed rule change,
at least five business days prior to the date of filing
of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time
as designated by the Commission. The Exchange
has satisfied this requirement.
18 17
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 125 / Monday, June 29, 2020 / Notices
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
A proposed rule change filed
pursuant to Rule 19b–4(f)(6) under the
Act 19 normally does not become
operative for 30 days after the date of its
filing. However, Rule 19b–4(f)(6)(iii) 20
permits the Commission to designate a
shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the
public interest. The Exchange has asked
the Commission to waive the 30-day
operative delay. The Exchange believes
that waiver of the operative delay is
consistent with the protection of
investors and the public interest
because it is substantially similar to the
process that is currently in place
pursuant to the Exchange Rule 5.7 21 in
the event of a malfunction or disruption
of the Exchange’s systems such that a
Trading Permit Holder is unable to
systematize an order. The Exchange
notes that wherein each order
transmitted to the Exchange during a
malfunction or disruption of the
Exchange’s systems must be recorded
legibly in a written form that has been
approved by the Exchange, and the
Trading Permit Holder receiving such
order must record the time of its receipt
on the floor and legibly record the terms
of the order, in written form. The
Exchange states that the proposed rule
change merely requires participants
currently report transaction information
to the Exchange with respect to orders
executed during an outage, and to
continue to do so in a uniform manner.
For this reason, the Commission
believes that waiver of the 30-day
operative delay is consistent with the
protection of investors and the public
interest because the proposed rule
change does not modify the information
that participants must report, nor does
it change how open outcry trading will
occur. The Commission believes the
proposed rule change will provide
consistency and clarity in the Cboe
Rules regarding how to report
transaction information to the Exchange
in the event of an outage, which will
benefit investors. Waiver of the
operative delay will also permit the
Exchange to implement the proposed
rule change in connection with the
current proposed reopening of its
trading floor on June 15, 2020.
Therefore, the Commission hereby
waives the operative delay and
designates the proposal as operative
upon filing.22
19 17
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6).
CFR 240.19b–4(f)(6)(iii).
21 See supra note 13.
22 For purposes only of waiving the 30-day
operative delay, the Commission also has
considered the proposed rule’s impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See
15 U.S.C. 78c(f).
20 17
VerDate Sep<11>2014
20:25 Jun 26, 2020
Jkt 250001
At any time within 60 days of the
filing of the proposed rule change, the
Commission summarily may
temporarily suspend such rule change if
it appears to the Commission that such
action is necessary or appropriate in the
public interest, for the protection of
investors, or otherwise in furtherance of
the purposes of the Act. If the
Commission takes such action, the
Commission shall institute proceedings
to determine whether the proposed rule
change should be approved or
disapproved.
39021
cautioned that we do not redact or edit
personal identifying information from
comment submissions. You should
submit only information that you wish
to make available publicly. All
submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2020–053 and
should be submitted on or before July
20, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of
Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated
authority.23
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to
submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing,
including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act.
Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
[FR Doc. 2020–13872 Filed 6–26–20; 8:45 am]
Electronic Comments
• Use the Commission’s internet
comment form (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml); or
• Send an email to rule-comments@
sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–
CBOE–2020–053 on the subject line.
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe
BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing
and Immediate Effectiveness of a
Proposed Rule Change Relating To
Amend Certain Rules Within Rules 4.5
Through 4.16, Which Contain the
Exchange’s Compliance Rule
(‘‘Compliance Rule’’) Regarding the
National Market System Plan
Governing the Consolidated Audit Trail
(the ‘‘CAT NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’)
Paper Comments
• Send paper comments in triplicate
to Secretary, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549–1090.
All submissions should refer to File
Number SR–CBOE–2020–053. This file
number should be included on the
subject line if email is used. To help the
Commission process and review your
comments more efficiently, please use
only one method. The Commission will
post all comments on the Commission’s
internet website (https://www.sec.gov/
rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the
submission, all subsequent
amendments, all written statements
with respect to the proposed rule
change that are filed with the
Commission, and all written
communications relating to the
proposed rule change between the
Commission and any person, other than
those that may be withheld from the
public in accordance with the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be
available for website viewing and
printing in the Commission’s Public
Reference Room, 100 F Street NE,
Washington, DC 20549, on official
business days between the hours of
10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the
filing also will be available for
inspection and copying at the principal
office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change.
Persons submitting comments are
PO 00000
Frm 00182
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
BILLING CODE 8011–01–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
[Release No. 34–89134; File No. SR–
CboeBZX–2020–052]
June 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(‘‘Act’’),1 and Rule 19b–4 thereunder,2
notice is hereby given that on June 22,
2020, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.
(‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘BZX’’) filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission
(‘‘Commission’’) the proposed rule
change as described in Items I and II
below, which Items have been prepared
by the Exchange. The Commission is
publishing this notice to solicit
comments on the proposed rule change
from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s
Statement of the Terms of Substance of
the Proposed Rule Change
Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the
‘‘Exchange’’ or ‘‘Cboe BZX’’) proposes to
amend certain Rules within Rules 4.5
through 4.16, which contain the
Exchange’s compliance rule
(‘‘Compliance Rule’’) regarding the
National Market System Plan Governing
the Consolidated Audit Trail (the ‘‘CAT
NMS Plan’’ or ‘‘Plan’’) The text of the
proposed rule change is provided in
Exhibit 5.
23 17
CFR 200.30–3(a)(12).
U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
2 17 CFR 240.19b–4.
1 15
E:\FR\FM\29JNN1.SGM
29JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 125 (Monday, June 29, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 39019-39021]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13872]
[[Page 39019]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
[Release No. 34-89128; File No. SR-CBOE-2020-053]
Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe Exchange, Inc.; Notice of
Filing and Immediate Effectiveness of a Proposed Rule Change To Amend
Rule 6.1 in Order To Provide for a Consistent Documentation of Open
Outcry Execution Information in the Event of an Exchange System
Malfunction or Disruption
June 23, 2020.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the ``Act''),\1\ and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,\2\ notice is hereby given
that on June 10, 2020, Cboe Exchange, Inc. (the ``Exchange'' or ``Cboe
Options'') filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
``Commission'') the proposed rule change as described in Items I, and
II below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Exchange
filed the proposal as a ``non-controversial'' proposed rule change
pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Act \3\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\4\ The Commission is publishing this notice to
solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).
\2\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4.
\3\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A)(iii).
\4\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance
of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.1 in order to provide for a
consistent documentation of open outcry execution information in the
event of an Exchange system malfunction or disruption.
The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the
Exchange's website (https://www.cboe.com/AboutCBOE/CBOELegalRegulatoryHome.aspx), at the Exchange's Office of the
Secretary, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
II. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
In its filing with the Commission, the Exchange included statements
concerning the purpose of and basis for the proposed rule change and
discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The
text of these statements may be examined at the places specified in
Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in
sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant aspects of such
statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and
Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
1. Purpose
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 6.1 in order to provide for a
consistent documentation of open outcry execution information in the
event of an Exchange system malfunction or disruption.
Specifically, Rule 6.1(a) requires that a Trading Permit Holder
(``TPH'') in each transaction to be designated by the Exchange must
report or ensure the transaction is reported to the Exchange within 90
seconds of the execution in a form and manner prescribed by the
Exchange so that the trade information may be reported to time and
sales reports.\5\ Pursuant to Rule 6.1(c)(1), the seller (or buyer if
designated by the Exchange) must submit the transaction report through
an electronic data transmission link approved by the Exchange in order
to fulfill the Rule 6.1(a) reporting requirement. Additionally, Rule
6.1(c) provides that participants (both the buyer and the seller) must
immediately record on a card or ticket or enter in an electronic data
storage medium acceptable to the Exchange certain requisite transaction
information. Such transaction information includes, among other things,
the time of the transaction obtained from a source designated by the
Exchange,\6\ and must be included in the transaction report. Currently,
TPHs submit transaction reports through Public Automated Routing System
(``PAR'') \7\ workstations. In practice, generally, when an order is
executed in open outcry, a participant nearly contemporaneously with
the execution enters the requisite trade information into a PAR
workstation, including the transaction time and presses a ``trade''
button, which both reports the trade to the Exchange and constitutes
the entry of requisite trade information in an electronic data storage
medium pursuant to Rule 6.1(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ The Exchange notes that for trades executed electronically
through the System, trade information is immediately submitted to
the Exchange so that it may be reported to the tape.
\6\ The Exchange notes that there are universal clocks on the
trading floor which brokers may use when recording outage reports.
\7\ See Rule 5.82.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rule 6.1(a) currently allows for designated late reporting,
however, a pattern or practice of late reporting without exceptional
circumstances may be considered conduct inconsistent with just and
equitable principles of trade and subject to fines or discipline under
Exchange Rules.\8\ Therefore, in the event an Exchange system
experiences a malfunction or disruption so that a participant is unable
to electronically submit the requisite transaction information and
report open outcry transaction information within the 90 second window
(i.e. an ``outage''), a late reporting designation is considered
acceptable and the participant is able to electronically submit the
trade information and simultaneously report the transaction upon
resolution of the malfunction or disruption and resumption of the
impacted Exchange system. Although pursuant to Rule 6.1(c), a
participant is able to record the transaction information on a card or
ticket, and may currently do so in the case of an outage (and following
the outage is then able to electronically enter the trade information
and submit the transaction report), the Exchange Rules do not currently
provide for a specific manner and form in which a participant should
report transaction information, including the transaction time, in the
event that an outage impedes a participant's ability to submit an
electronic transaction record within the required time period.\9\ As
such, the Exchange now proposes to amend Rule 6.1(a) to provide
additional clarity and consistency regarding the documentation and
submission of transaction reports for open outcry executions that occur
during an outage.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ See also Rule 6.1(j)(2), which provides that in the event a
Clearing Trading Permit Holder attempts to send trade information by
electronic transmission but is unable to get through to the Exchange
computer system, the Clearing Trading Permit Holder may contact the
Exchange's Trade Desk Department to inquire if the Exchange's system
is ready to receive such Clearing Trading Permit Holder's
transmission.
\9\ In connection with past outages, participants have reported
this information to the Exchange, but have done so in different
manners. The proposed rule change will require participants to
report this information to the Exchange in the same manner as
designated by the Exchange.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Specifically, the proposed change adopts subparagraph (a)(2) \10\
to Rule 6.1, which provides that in the event of an Exchange system
malfunction or disruption such that a participant is unable to
electronically report trade information pursuant to subparagraph (c) of
Rule 6.1 for orders executed in open outcry (an ``outage''), a
participant
[[Page 39020]]
will record execution information, including the transaction time, for
orders executed in open outcry in a manner and form determined by the
Exchange. Upon the resolution of the outage, a participant must resume
electronic submission of transaction reports within the 90 second time
frame and must use best efforts to input electronically into the
Exchange's system the execution information required by subparagraph
(c) of Rule 6.1 for the order(s) executed in open outcry during the
outage not later than the close of business on the day that the
malfunction or disruption ceases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The proposed change also separates the late reporting
provisions in current Rule 6.1(a) into subparagraph (a)(1) (and
titles the proposed subparagraph ``Late Reports'') for formatting
consistency and ease of reading and following Rule 6.1(a) generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
By providing that the Exchange determines the manner and form that
participants must report transaction information for executions that
occur during an outage,\11\ the proposed rule change will provide for
consistency among all participants with respect to their electronic
submission of transaction reports to the Exchange after the system
malfunction or disruption is resolved. The proposed rule will also
provide additional clarity in the Rules regarding the procedure
participants must use to submit transaction information to the Exchange
following the resolution of an outage. A uniform approach will also
provide for more consistency of information in the Exchange's audit
trail.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ Pursuant to Rule 1.5, the Exchange will announce its
determination of the manner and form via: (1) Specifications,
Notices, or Regulatory Circulars with appropriate advanced notice,
which are posted on the Exchange's website, or as otherwise provided
in the Rules; (2) electronic message; or (3) other communication
method as provided in the Rules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Exchange also notes that a similar process is currently in
place pursuant to the Exchange Rules in the event of a malfunction or
disruption of the Exchange's systems such that a Trading Permit Holder
is unable to systematize an order, wherein each order transmitted to
the Exchange during a malfunction or disruption of the Exchange's
systems must be recorded legibly in a written form that has been
approved by the Exchange,\12\ and the Trading Permit Holder receiving
such order must record the time of its receipt on the floor and legibly
record the terms of the order, in written form.\13\ Such rules also
permit the retroactive entry of order receipt information following the
cessation of the malfunction or disruption.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ The Exchange notes that a legible record is a manner in
which it intends to determine that a participant will be required to
record execution information upon an outage, as proposed.
\13\ See Rule 5.7(f)(2)(C)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Statutory Basis
The Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ``Act'') and the rules and
regulations thereunder applicable to the Exchange and, in particular,
the requirements of Section 6(b) of the Act.\14\ Specifically, the
Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \15\ requirements that the rules of an exchange be
designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to
promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation
and coordination with persons engaged in regulating, clearing,
settling, processing information with respect to, and facilitating
transactions in securities, to remove impediments to and perfect the
mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and,
in general, to protect investors and the public interest. Additionally,
the Exchange believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the
Section 6(b)(5) \16\ requirement that the rules of an exchange not be
designed to permit unfair discrimination between customers, issuers,
brokers, or dealers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b).
\15\ 15 U.S.C. 78f(b)(5).
\16\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In particular, by requiring participants to report open outcry
transaction information for orders executed during an outage in a
specific manner and form determined by the Exchange, the Exchange
believes that the proposed rule change will remove impediments to and
perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and national market
system and help to ensure the maintenance of a fair and orderly market,
thereby protecting investors, as it provides for consistency and
additional clarity regarding the documentation and form of submission
of transaction information for open outcry executions that occur during
an outage, and the form of the reports of that information to the
Exchange following resolution of the outage. The Exchange further
believes the proposed rule change may prevent fraudulent and
manipulative acts and otherwise promote just and equitable principles
of trade. Particularly, the proposed rule change will require a uniform
approach to the documentation and reporting procedures of transaction
information for orders executed during an outage, which will provide
for consistency in the Exchange's audit trail.
The Exchange does not believe that documentation of certain trade
information in a manner and form determined by the Exchange and the
procedure regarding retroactive submission of certain trade information
in the event of a system malfunction or disruption would present any
new or novel issues or reporting policies for participants, as similar
procedures are already in place under the Exchange Rules in the event a
system malfunction or disruption results in participants' inability to
systematize their orders upon receipt.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will
impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate
in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The Exchange does not
believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on
intramarket competition that is not necessary or appropriate in
furtherance of the purposes of the Act because it would apply equally
to all participants. In addition, the Exchange does not believe that
the proposed rule change will impose any burden on intermarket
competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the
purposes of the Act because the proposed rule change is not competitive
in nature nor does it relate to trading on the Exchange. Rather, it
relates solely to the manner and form of reporting transaction
information to the Exchange in outage scenarios.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed
Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
The Exchange neither solicited nor received comments on the
proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for
Commission Action
Because the foregoing proposed rule change does not: (i)
Significantly affect the protection of investors or the public
interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii)
become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or
such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become
effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act \17\ and Rule 19b-
4(f)(6) thereunder.\18\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(3)(A).
\18\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). In addition, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)
requires a self-regulatory organization to give the Commission
written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along
with a brief description and text of the proposed rule change, at
least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed
rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.
The Exchange has satisfied this requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 39021]]
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the
Act \19\ normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date
of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii) \20\ permits the
Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent
with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange
has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay. The
Exchange believes that waiver of the operative delay is consistent with
the protection of investors and the public interest because it is
substantially similar to the process that is currently in place
pursuant to the Exchange Rule 5.7 \21\ in the event of a malfunction or
disruption of the Exchange's systems such that a Trading Permit Holder
is unable to systematize an order. The Exchange notes that wherein each
order transmitted to the Exchange during a malfunction or disruption of
the Exchange's systems must be recorded legibly in a written form that
has been approved by the Exchange, and the Trading Permit Holder
receiving such order must record the time of its receipt on the floor
and legibly record the terms of the order, in written form. The
Exchange states that the proposed rule change merely requires
participants currently report transaction information to the Exchange
with respect to orders executed during an outage, and to continue to do
so in a uniform manner. For this reason, the Commission believes that
waiver of the 30-day operative delay is consistent with the protection
of investors and the public interest because the proposed rule change
does not modify the information that participants must report, nor does
it change how open outcry trading will occur. The Commission believes
the proposed rule change will provide consistency and clarity in the
Cboe Rules regarding how to report transaction information to the
Exchange in the event of an outage, which will benefit investors.
Waiver of the operative delay will also permit the Exchange to
implement the proposed rule change in connection with the current
proposed reopening of its trading floor on June 15, 2020. Therefore,
the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the
proposal as operative upon filing.\22\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6).
\20\ 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6)(iii).
\21\ See supra note 13.
\22\ For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay,
the Commission also has considered the proposed rule's impact on
efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C.
78c(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule
change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule
change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or
appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or
otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission
takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to
determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or
disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and
arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule
change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
Electronic Comments
Use the Commission's internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
Send an email to [email protected]. Please include
File Number SR-CBOE-2020-053 on the subject line.
Paper Comments
Send paper comments in triplicate to Secretary, Securities
and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-053. This file
number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help
the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently,
please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on
the Commission's internet website (https://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml).
Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written
statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with
the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed
rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those
that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions
of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for website viewing and printing in
the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC
20549, on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and
3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection
and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments
received will be posted without change. Persons submitting comments are
cautioned that we do not redact or edit personal identifying
information from comment submissions. You should submit only
information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions
should refer to File Number SR-CBOE-2020-053 and should be submitted on
or before July 20, 2020.
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets,
pursuant to delegated authority.\23\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
J. Matthew DeLesDernier,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2020-13872 Filed 6-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P