Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People's Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders, 38359-38360 [2020-13811]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 / Notices
conference call number and conference
ID number.
Members of the public are entitled to
make comments during the open period
at the end of the meeting. Members of
the public may also submit written
comments; the comments must be
received in the Regional Programs Unit
within 30 days following the meeting.
Written comments may be mailed to the
Western Regional Office, U.S.
Commission on Civil Rights, 300 North
Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, Los
Angeles, CA 90012. They may also be
emailed to Ana Victoria Fortes at
afortes@usccr.gov.
Records and documents discussed
during the meeting will be available for
public viewing prior to and after the
meeting at https://
www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/
FACAPublicViewCommitteeDetails?
id=a10t0000001gzlJAAQ.
Records generated from this meeting
may also be inspected and reproduced
at the Regional Programs Unit, as they
become available, both before and after
the meeting. Persons interested in the
work of this Committee are directed to
the Commission’s website, https://
www.usccr.gov, or may contact the
Regional Programs Unit at the above
email or street address.
Agenda
I. Welcome
II. Nominate Vice Chair
III. Concept Stage Presentation
IV. Review Civil Rights Topics
V. Public Comment
VI. Discuss Next Steps
VII. Good of the Order
VIII. Adjournment
Dated: June 22, 2020.
David Mussatt,
Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit.
[FR Doc. 2020–13777 Filed 6–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–570–012, C–570–013]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod From the People’s Republic of
China: Continuation of Antidumping
and Countervailing Duty Orders
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the
determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the
International Trade Commission (ITC)
that revocation of the antidumping (AD)
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Jun 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
and countervailing duty (CVD) orders
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod from the People’s Republic of China
(China) would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of dumping,
countervailable subsidies, and material
injury to an industry in the United
States, Commerce is publishing a notice
of continuation of these AD and CVD
orders.
DATES:
Applicable June 26, 2020.
Ian
Hamilton, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Background
On January 8, 2015, Commerce
published both the AD and CVD orders
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod from China.1 On December 2, 2019,
the ITC instituted,2 and on Commerce
initiated,3 the five-year (sunset) reviews
of the AD and CVD orders on carbon
and certain alloy steel wire rod from
China, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).
As a result of its reviews, Commerce
determined that revocation of the
Orders on carbon and certain alloy steel
wire rod from China would be likely to
lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping and countervailable subsidies
and, therefore, notified the ITC of the
magnitude of the margins and net
subsidy rates likely to prevail should
the Orders be revoked.4 On June 19,
2020, the ITC published its
determinations, pursuant to sections
751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that
revocation of the Orders would likely
lead to continuation or recurrence of
material injury to an industry in the
1 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from the People’s Republic of China: Antidumping
Duty Order, 80 FR 1015 (January 8, 2015); see also
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the
People’s Republic of China: Amended Final
Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination and
Countervailing Duty Order, 80 FR 1018 (January 8,
2015) (collectively, Orders).
2 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from China; Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR
66007 (December 2, 2019).
3 See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84
FR 65968 (December 2, 2019).
4 See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results
of the Expedited First Five-Year Sunset Review of
the Countervailing Duty Order, 85 FR 17533 (March
30, 2020), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (IDM); and Carbon and Certain Alloy
Steel Wire Rod from the People’s Republic of China:
Final Results of the Expedited First Five-Year
Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85
FR 19136 (April 6, 2020), and accompanying IDM.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
38359
United States within a reasonably
foreseeable time.5
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these
Orders is certain hot-rolled products of
carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately circular cross section,
less than 19.00 mm in actual solid crosssectional diameter. Specifically
excluded are steel products possessing
the above-noted physical characteristics
and meeting the Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool
steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball
bearing steel; or (e) concrete reinforcing
bars and rods. Also excluded are free
cutting steel (also known as free
machining steel) products (i.e., products
that contain by weight one or more of
the following elements: 0.1 percent or
more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of
bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur,
more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or
more than 0.01 percent of tellurium).
All products meeting the physical
description of subject merchandise that
are not specifically excluded are
included in this scope.
The products subject to these Orders
are currently classifiable under
subheadings 7213.91.3011,
7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020,
7213.91.3093; 7213.91.4500,
7213.91.6000, 7213.99.0030,
7227.20.0030, 7227.20.0080,
7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020,
7227.90.6030, and 7227.90.6035 of the
HTSUS. Products entered under
subheadings 7213.99.0090 and
7227.90.6090 of the HTSUS also may be
included in this scope if they meet the
physical description of subject
merchandise above. Although the
HTSUS subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the merchandise
covered by these Orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by
Commerce and the ITC that revocation
of the Orders would likely lead to a
continuation or a recurrence of dumping
and countervailable subsidies and of
material injury to an industry in the
United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR
351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the
continuation of the Orders. U.S.
Customs and Border Protection will
5 See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
China (Inv. Nos. 701–TA–512 and 731–TA–1248
(Review)), 85 FR 37108 (June 19, 2020); see also
Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China (Inv.
Nos. 701–TA–512 and 731–TA–1248 (Review)),
USITC Pub. 5064 (June 2020).
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
38360
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 124 / Friday, June 26, 2020 / Notices
continue to collect AD and CVD cash
deposits at the rates in effect at the time
of entry for all imports of subject
merchandise. The effective date of the
continuation of the Orders will be the
date of publication in the Federal
Register of this notice of continuation.
Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act
and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce
intends to initiate the next five-year
review of the Orders not later than 30
days prior to the fifth anniversary of the
effective date of continuation.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only
reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of
their responsibility concerning the
return/destruction or conversion to
judicial protective order of proprietary
information disclosed under APO in
accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
Failure to comply is a violation of the
APO which may be subject to sanctions.
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year (sunset) reviews and
this notice are in accordance with
sections 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and
published in accordance with section
777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR
351.218(f)(4). Note that Commerce has
modified certain of its requirements for
serving documents containing business
proprietary information, until July 17,
2020, unless extended.6
Dated: June 22, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and
Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020–13811 Filed 6–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–122–857; C–122–858]
Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Certain Softwood Lumber
Products from Canada: Notice of Court
Decision Not in Harmony With Final
Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended
Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court
Decision
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(Commerce) is notifying the public that
the Court of International Trade’s (CIT)
final judgment in Shake and Shingle
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
AGENCY:
6 See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service
Requirements Due to COVID–19; Extension of
Effective Period, 85 FR 29615 (May 18, 2020).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:42 Jun 25, 2020
Jkt 250001
Alliance v. United States, Court No. 18–
00228, is not in harmony with
Commerce’s final scope ruling and is,
therefore, finding that certain cedar
shakes and shingles exported by the
Shake and Shingle Alliance (SSA) are
not within the scope of the antidumping
(AD) and countervailing duty (CVD)
orders on certain softwood lumber
(softwood lumber) from Canada.
DATES: Applicable April 30, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Maisha Cryor, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401
Constitution Avenue NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–5831.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Commerce issued the AD and CVD
orders on softwood lumber from Canada
on January 3, 2018.1 On September 10,
2018, in response to a scope ruling
request filed by SSA, Commerce issued
its Final Scope Ruling, finding that
certain cedar shakes and shingles
exported by SSA are covered by the
scope of the Orders.2 As a result of the
Final Scope Ruling, Commerce
instructed U.S. Customs and Border
Protection (CBP) to continue suspension
of liquidation of entries of SAA’s certain
cedar shakes and shingles.3
SAA challenged Commerce’s Final
Scope Ruling before the CIT. On
November 13, 2019, the CIT remanded
the Final Scope Ruling to Commerce to
further consider the record as it pertains
to the determination of the subject
merchandise, to further consider record
evidence as it pertains to the
determination of whether cedar shakes
and shingles are within the scope of the
Orders, and to further consider prior
determinations, including but not
limited to scope rulings, in accordance
with 19 CFR 351.225(k)(1).4
Pursuant to the CIT’s Remand Order,
on remand, Commerce reconsidered its
Final Scope Ruling and determined that
1 See Certain Softwood Lumber Products From
Canada: Amended Final Affirmative Countervailing
Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order,
83 FR 347 (January 3, 2018); and Certain Softwood
Lumber Products from Canada: Antidumping Duty
Order and Partial Amended Final Determination,
83 FR 350 (January 3, 2018) (collectively, the
Orders).
2 See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders on Certain Softwood Lumber Products from
Canada: Final Scope Ruling—Cedar Shakes and
Shingles, dated September 10, 2018 (Final Scope
Ruling).
3 See CBP Message Numbers 9045306 and
9045308, dated February 14, 2019.
4 See Shake and Shingle Alliance v. United
States, Slip Op. 19–140, Court No. 18–00228 (CIT
2019) (Remand Order).
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 9990
SSA’s certain cedar shakes and shingles
do not fall within the scope of the
Orders.5 Specifically, Commerce
determined that the petitioner never
intended for cedar shakes and shingles
to be covered by the Orders.6 On April
20, 2020, the CIT sustained Commerce’s
Final Remand Results.7
Timken Notice
In its decision in Timken,8 as clarified
by Diamond Sawblades,9 the Court of
Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC)
held that, pursuant to section 516A(c)
and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended (the Act), Commerce must
publish a notice of a court decision that
is not ‘‘in harmony’’ with a Commerce
determination and must suspend
liquidation of entries pending a
‘‘conclusive’’ court decision. The CIT’s
April 20, 2020, judgment in this case
constitutes a final decision of the court
that is not in harmony with Commerce’s
Final Scope Ruling. This notice is
published in fulfillment of the
publication requirements of Timken.
Amended Final Scope Ruling
Because there is now a final court
decision with respect to this case,
Commerce is amending its final scope
ruling and finds that the scope of the
Orders do not cover certain cedar shakes
and shingles exported by SSA.
Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate
entries of certain cedar shakes and
shingles exported by SSA without
regard to AD and or CVD duties, and to
lift suspension of liquidation of such
entries.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice is issued and published in
accordance with sections 516A(e)(1) of
the Act.
Dated: June 22, 2020.
Joseph A. Laroski Jr.,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Policy and
Negotiations.
[FR Doc. 2020–13812 Filed 6–25–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P
5 See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant
to Court Remand, Shake and Shingle Alliance v.
United States, Court No. 18–00228, Slip Op. 19–140
(CIT November 2019), dated February 13, 2020
(Final Remand Results).
6 Id. at 15.
7 See Shake and Shingle Alliance v. United
States, Court No. 18–00228, Slip Op. 20–52 (CIT
April 20, 2020).
8 See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337,
341 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
9 See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v.
United States, 626 F. 3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
(Diamond Sawblades).
E:\FR\FM\26JNN1.SGM
26JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 124 (Friday, June 26, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 38359-38360]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-13811]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A-570-012, C-570-013]
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod From the People's
Republic of China: Continuation of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty
Orders
AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: As a result of the determinations by the Department of
Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) that
revocation of the antidumping (AD) and countervailing duty (CVD) orders
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from the People's Republic
of China (China) would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of
dumping, countervailable subsidies, and material injury to an industry
in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation
of these AD and CVD orders.
DATES: Applicable June 26, 2020.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ian Hamilton, AD/CVD Operations,
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S.
Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC
20230; telephone: (202) 482-4798.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 8, 2015, Commerce published both the AD and CVD orders
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from China.\1\ On December
2, 2019, the ITC instituted,\2\ and on Commerce initiated,\3\ the five-
year (sunset) reviews of the AD and CVD orders on carbon and certain
alloy steel wire rod from China, pursuant to section 751(c) of the
Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews,
Commerce determined that revocation of the Orders on carbon and certain
alloy steel wire rod from China would be likely to lead to continuation
or recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and, therefore,
notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins and net subsidy rates
likely to prevail should the Orders be revoked.\4\ On June 19, 2020,
the ITC published its determinations, pursuant to sections 751(c) and
752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the Orders would likely lead to
continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the
United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.\5\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the
People's Republic of China: Antidumping Duty Order, 80 FR 1015
(January 8, 2015); see also Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod
from the People's Republic of China: Amended Final Affirmative
Countervailing Duty Determination and Countervailing Duty Order, 80
FR 1018 (January 8, 2015) (collectively, Orders).
\2\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China;
Institution of Five-Year Reviews, 84 FR 66007 (December 2, 2019).
\3\ See Initiation of Five-Year (Sunset) Reviews, 84 FR 65968
(December 2, 2019).
\4\ See Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from the
People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First
Five-Year Sunset Review of the Countervailing Duty Order, 85 FR
17533 (March 30, 2020), and accompanying Issues and Decision
Memorandum (IDM); and Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited First
Five-Year Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 19136
(April 6, 2020), and accompanying IDM.
\5\ See Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China (Inv. Nos.
701-TA-512 and 731-TA-1248 (Review)), 85 FR 37108 (June 19, 2020);
see also Carbon and Alloy Steel Wire Rod from China (Inv. Nos. 701-
TA-512 and 731-TA-1248 (Review)), USITC Pub. 5064 (June 2020).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise covered by these Orders is certain hot-rolled
products of carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately
circular cross section, less than 19.00 mm in actual solid cross-
sectional diameter. Specifically excluded are steel products possessing
the above-noted physical characteristics and meeting the Harmonized
Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS) definitions for (a)
stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball
bearing steel; or (e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods. Also excluded
are free cutting steel (also known as free machining steel) products
(i.e., products that contain by weight one or more of the following
elements: 0.1 percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of bismuth,
0.08 percent or more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus,
more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or more than 0.01 percent of
tellurium). All products meeting the physical description of subject
merchandise that are not specifically excluded are included in this
scope.
The products subject to these Orders are currently classifiable
under subheadings 7213.91.3011, 7213.91.3015, 7213.91.3020,
7213.91.3093; 7213.91.4500, 7213.91.6000, 7213.99.0030, 7227.20.0030,
7227.20.0080, 7227.90.6010, 7227.90.6020, 7227.90.6030, and
7227.90.6035 of the HTSUS. Products entered under subheadings
7213.99.0090 and 7227.90.6090 of the HTSUS also may be included in this
scope if they meet the physical description of subject merchandise
above. Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and
customs purposes, the written description of the merchandise covered by
these Orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the Orders
As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that
revocation of the Orders would likely lead to a continuation or a
recurrence of dumping and countervailable subsidies and of material
injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to section
751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(a), Commerce hereby orders the
continuation of the Orders. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will
[[Page 38360]]
continue to collect AD and CVD cash deposits at the rates in effect at
the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective
date of the continuation of the Orders will be the date of publication
in the Federal Register of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to
section 751(c)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(c)(2), Commerce intends
to initiate the next five-year review of the Orders not later than 30
days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of
continuation.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to
administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility
concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective
order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with
19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which
may be subject to sanctions.
Notification to Interested Parties
These five-year (sunset) reviews and this notice are in accordance
with sections 751(c) and (d)(2) of the Act and published in accordance
with section 777(i) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4). Note that
Commerce has modified certain of its requirements for serving documents
containing business proprietary information, until July 17, 2020,
unless extended.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ See Temporary Rule Modifying AD/CVD Service Requirements Due
to COVID-19; Extension of Effective Period, 85 FR 29615 (May 18,
2020).
Dated: June 22, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-13811 Filed 6-25-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P