Applications for New Awards; School-Based Mental Health Services Grant Program, 32025-32031 [2020-11388]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
Dated: May 22, 2020.
Stephanie Valentine,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer, Office of
Planning, Evaluation and Policy
Development.
[FR Doc. 2020–11461 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; SchoolBased Mental Health Services Grant
Program
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice.
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for
the School-Based Mental Health
Services Grant Program, Catalog of
Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
number 84.184H. This notice relates to
the approved information collection
under OMB control number 1894–0006.
SUMMARY:
DATES:
Applications Available: May 28, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: July 13, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However,
under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we waive
intergovernmental review in order to
make awards by the end of FY 2020.
For the address for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
ADDRESSES:
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Amy Banks, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 3E257, Washington, DC 20202–
6450. Telephone: (202) 453–6704.
Email: OESE.School.Mental.Health@
ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The SchoolBased Mental Health Services Grant
Program provides competitive grants to
State educational agencies (SEAs) to
increase the number of qualified (i.e.,
licensed, certified, well-trained, or
credentialed, each as defined in this
notice) mental health service providers
(service providers) providing schoolbased mental health services to students
in local educational agencies (LEAs)
with demonstrated need (as defined in
this notice).
Background: In the Department’s FY
2020 appropriations, Congress increased
funding for the School Safety National
Activities program, and included
direction in the Explanatory Statement
that $10 million be used to increase the
number of counselors, social workers,
psychologists, or other service providers
who provide school-based mental health
services to students. Under this
competition the Department will award
grants for that purpose. As indicated in
the absolute priority in this notice, the
focus of these grants will be increasing
the number of service providers in LEAs
with demonstrated need (as defined in
this notice) for these services to
maximize the impact given limited
available funding. The Department
recognizes the enhanced need for these
services and providers due to the Novel
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID–19).
Supporting the mental health needs of
all students remains a key focus of the
Administration, and these grants will
aid States and school districts in
meeting their increasing local needs.
Note: The provision of medical services by
such service providers is not an allowable
use of funds under this grant.
Priorities: This notice contains one
absolute priority and two competitive
preference priorities. We are
establishing the absolute priority,
competitive preference priority 1, and
part 3 of competitive preference priority
2 for the FY 2020 School-Based Mental
Health Services Grant competition and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the
General Education Provisions Act
(GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). In
accordance with 34 CFR 75.105(b)(2)(ii),
part 1 of competitive preference priority
2 is from the notice of final priorities
published in the Federal Register on
March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640)
(Administrative Priorities), and part 2 of
competitive preference priority 2 is from
the notice of final priority published in
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32025
the Federal Register on November 27,
2019 (84 FR 65300) (Opportunity Zones
NFP).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and
any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, this
priority is an absolute priority. Under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(3) we consider only
applications that meet the absolute
priority.
This priority is:
Absolute Priority: To increase the
number of qualified school-based
mental health service providers in LEAs
with demonstrated need.
To meet this priority, SEAs must
propose to increase the number of
qualified school counselors, school
social workers, school psychologists, or
other mental health professionals,
including those who provide services
remotely (telehealth), by implementing
plans to address the recruitment and
retention of service providers in LEAs
with demonstrated need. To meet this
priority, applicants must propose plans
that include both recruitment and
retention.
1. Recruitment (as defined in this
notice) of school-based mental health
providers for services in LEAs with
demonstrated need.
An applicant must propose a plan to
increase the number of service
providers, including service providers
who offer telehealth services, serving
students in LEAs with demonstrated
need, such as through payment towards
student loan repayments for those
service providers, promoting cross-State
licensing and certification reciprocity
for service providers, or providing
incentives for hiring, such as increased
pay or flexibility or creating hybrid roles
that allow for leadership, academic, or
research opportunities, or induction
programs.
2. Retention (as defined in this notice)
of existing school-based mental health
service providers in LEAs with
demonstrated need.
An applicant must also propose a
plan to improve the likelihood that
qualified service providers providing
services in LEAs with demonstrated
need remain in such LEAs over time.
Such a plan might include career
pathways programs, recognition and
award programs, mentorship programs,
or incentives or payment towards
student loan repayment for continued
service and should include
considerations for service providers
who offer telehealth services.
3. Demonstration of fiscal control.
The applicant must propose plans that
demonstrate it will ensure appropriate
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
32026
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
administrative and fiscal control of
grant funds.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2020 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities. Under
34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to
an additional fifteen points to an
application that meets Competitive
Preference Priority 1, and an additional
five points to an applicant that meets
one or more areas within Competitive
Preference Priority 2.
Applicants may choose whether or
not to address the competitive
preference priorities. An applicant must
clearly indicate in the abstract section of
the application if it addresses the
competitive preference priorities. When
applying under competitive preference
priority 2, the applicant must provide
relevant information in the abstract,
including the name of LEA(s) or
school(s) it proposes to serve and their
locale code, Census tract, or status as an
‘‘affected LEA’’ under ESEA section
8538.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1—
Respecialization of Existing Mental
Health Service Providers to Qualify
Them for Work in LEAs with
Demonstrated Need (up to 15 points).
To meet this priority, an applicant
must propose a respecialization plan
that promotes the readiness of service
providers who already have training as
social workers, counselors,
psychologists, or other related fields by
supporting incremental training needed
for working in a K–12 school and that
increases the number of service
providers who will be qualified to serve
in LEAs with demonstrated need. This
can be done by one or more of the
following—
(a) Revising, updating, or streamlining
requirements for such individuals so
that additional training or other
requirements focus only on the
incremental training needed;
(b) Leveraging technological
innovations such as online and distance
learning;
(c) Offering flexible options for
completing training that leads such
professionals to meet State
requirements; or—
(d) Establishing new State-level
programs that provide alternate means
of certification, licensure, or
credentialing for such professionals,
including through practical or on-thejob training. Such approaches must
promote readiness to serve in LEAs.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
Rural Applicants; Spurring Investment
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
in Qualified Opportunity Zones; or
American Indian/Alaska Native Tribal
Applicants (0 or 5 points).
Under this priority, an applicant must
demonstrate one or more of the
following:
1. Rural Applicants.
(a) The applicant proposes to serve a
community that is served by one or
more LEAs with a locale code of 32, 33,
41, 42, or 43; or
(b) The applicant proposes a project
in which a majority of the schools
served have a locale code of 32, 33, 41,
42, or 43.
Note: Applicants are encouraged to retrieve
locale codes from the NCES School District
search tool (nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/),
where LEAs can be looked up individually to
retrieve locale codes, and Public School
search tool (nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/),
where individual schools can be looked up
to retrieve locale codes.
2. Spurring Investment in Qualified
Opportunity Zones. The area in which
the applicant proposes to provide
services overlaps with a Qualified
Opportunity Zone, as designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury under section
1400Z–1 of the Internal Revenue Code.
An applicant must—
(a) Provide the census tract number of
the Qualified Opportunity Zone(s) in
which it proposes to provide services;
and
(b) Describe how the applicant will
provide services in the Qualified
Opportunity Zone(s).
Note: A list of Qualified Opportunity
Zones, including relevant census tract
numbers, is available at www.cdfifund.gov/
Pages/Opportunity-Zones.aspx.
Applicants may also determine
whether a particular area overlaps with
a qualified opportunity zone using the
National Center of Education Statistics
map located at https://nces.ed.gov/
programs/maped/LocaleLookup/.
3. Serving one or more LEA(s) that
serve American Indian/Alaska Native
students (as defined in this notice). To
meet this part of the priority, an SEA
must demonstrate that it is focusing the
proposed project on one or more LEAs
that predominantly serve members of
one or more federally recognized
Tribe(s). The applicant must specify the
LEA or LEAs that meet this part of the
competitive preference priority.
Note: While an applicant may meet
Competitive Preference Priority 2 in more
than one way, an applicant receives no more
than 5 points for meeting this priority.
Requirements: We are establishing
these application and program
requirements for the FY 2020 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
unfunded applications from this
competition, in accordance with section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Application Requirements: In its
application, an applicant must describe
the following:
(a) Severity and magnitude of the
problem and how it will identify and
select LEAs with demonstrated need to
be served by the proposed plan.
LEAs with demonstrated need are K–
12 LEAs that are experiencing need in
regard to mental health services for
students, resulting from high student to
mental health service provider ratios as
compared to other LEAs statewide or
nationally or LEAs in which the school
climate is negatively impacted by
pervasive violence, poverty, substance
abuse (including opioid abuse), suicide,
natural or manmade disasters, or
trafficking. LEAs may also demonstrate
a need if they have high mental health
service provider to student ratios and
have a significant number of families
deployed in the military.
Applicants must describe the lack of
school-based service providers and its
effect on students in LEAs to be served
by the grant. Applicants must also
describe the nature of the problem for
the LEA(s), based on information
including, but not limited to, the most
recent available ratios of service
providers to students enrolled in LEAs
designated by the SEA to benefit from
the School-Based Mental Health
Services Grant Program, provided in the
aggregate and disaggregated by
profession (e.g., school social workers,
school psychologists, school counselors)
as compared to local, State, or national
data. The description may also include
LEA-level or school-level demographic
data, school climate surveys, school
violence/crime data, data related to
suicide rates, and descriptions of
barriers to hiring and retaining service
providers in these LEAs.
(b) Logic model.
The applicant must describe its
approach to increase the number of
qualified service providers using a logic
model (as defined in this notice),
including the key project components
and relevant outcomes (each as defined
in this notice). The description should
indicate how the approach taken under
this program will update or expand on
any previous approach and how such
new approach will take into
consideration the previous barriers.
(c) Detailed project budget, including
matching funds.
To promote the sustainability of the
school-based mental health services, all
applicants must include matching funds
in the amount of at least 25 percent in
their budgets. Budgets must describe
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
both how the applicant will meet the 25
percent matching requirement under
this grant, and the source of the funds,
such as State, local, or private resources
(see Section III). In addition, the budget
must specify the portion of funds that
will be used for respecialization, if
applicable. In total, administrative costs,
including funding for State-level or
LEA-level administrative updates that
promote respecialization, if applicable,
may not exceed 10 percent of the annual
grant award.
(d) Number of providers.
Applicants must include the most
recent available data on the number of
service providers, disaggregated by
profession (e.g., school social workers,
school psychologists, school counselors)
and the projected number of service
providers they will place into
employment in the identified LEAs for
each year of the plan using funds from
this grant or matching funds, including
the unduplicated number of service
providers offering telehealth services.
(e) A plan for collaboration and
coordination with related Federal, State,
and local organizations and initiatives.
Applicants must describe how they
intend to collaborate with State,
regional, and local organizations, such
as school social worker associations,
school psychologist associations, school
counselor associations, or colleges or
universities, and describe their
relationship and coordination with
regional and local mental health, public
health, child welfare, and other
community agencies, to achieve plan
goals and objectives of increasing the
number of school-based mental health
service providers in LEAs with
demonstrated need. Applicants may
also describe proposed coordination
with existing federally funded efforts
related to elementary and secondary
school counseling and mental health
promotion. If such coordination will
occur, applicants must identify which
Federal program(s) they are
coordinating with and how such
coordination will promote program
success across multiple programs.
(f) Planned use of grant funds to
supplement, and not supplant, existing
school-based mental health services
funds and to expand, not duplicate,
efforts to increase the number of
providers.
Applicants must describe how project
funds will supplement, and not
supplant, non-Federal funds that would
otherwise be available for activities
funded under this program.
Applicants must describe how they
will use the School-Based Mental
Health Services Grant Program funds to
expand, rather than duplicate, existing,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
ongoing, or new efforts to increase the
number of service providers in LEAs
with demonstrated need that are
qualified to provide school-based
mental health services, including
providers offering telehealth services,
and how the plan will integrate existing
funding streams and efforts to support
the plan.
(g) Options for provision of student
mental health services via secure
telehealth services.
If an applicant proposes to allow
LEAs to offer telehealth services to
provide school-based mental health
services, the applicant must describe the
steps it will require the selected LEA(s)
to take in order to ensure that any
service provider offering telehealth
services does so in a manner consistent
with the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA) and the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA), as well as all applicable
Federal, State, and local laws and
ethical obligations and ethical
requirements and profession-specific
ethical obligations. Under FERPA, LEAs
must ensure that reasonable methods
are used to protect personally
identifiable information (PII) from the
education records of students (including
health records) maintained by the
school or LEA. The description of the
provision of telehealth mental health
services to students must also include
proposed methods to ensure equitable
access and compliance with applicable
privacy requirements (including FERPA,
and the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA)), and identify
proposed technology platforms, and
plans for the collection, maintenance
and use or sharing of any PII and
student data.
(h) Plan for emergency response.
Applicants must also describe how
they will ensure service providers have
emergency response plans in place if
students threaten harm to self or others.
(i) How the SEA determines the
selected LEA(s) are prepared to
immediately implement services to
address student need.
Applicants must describe how they
will determine that each selected LEA is
prepared to effectively utilize the
service provider(s) to address student
need.
Program Requirements:
(a) Applicants that receive an award
under this program must ensure that
any service provider hired under this
grant is qualified to work in K–12
schools, including a provider that offers
telehealth services.
(b) Applicants that receive an award
under this program must ensure that
any service provider offering telehealth
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32027
services does so in a manner consistent
with FERPA and all applicable Federal,
State, and local laws and ethical
obligations and ethical requirements.
Definitions: We are establishing the
following definitions in this notice for
the FY 2020 grant competition and any
subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded
applications from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of
GEPA, 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1): ‘‘certified,’’
‘‘credentialed,’’ ‘‘LEA with
demonstrated need,’’ ‘‘LEAs that serve
American Indian/Alaska Native
students,’’ ‘‘licensed,’’ ‘‘recruitment,’’
‘‘respecialization,’’ ‘‘retention,’’ ‘‘schoolbased mental health service provider,’’
‘‘telehealth,’’ and ‘‘well-trained.’’ The
following definitions are from 34 CFR
77.1: ‘‘logic model,’’ ‘‘project
component,’’ and ‘‘relevant outcome.’’
The following definitions are included
for the convenience of the reader: ‘‘local
educational agency’’ from 20 U.S.C.
7801(30), and ‘‘State educational
agency’’ from 20 U.S.C. 7801(49).
Certified means an individual has
documented verification of education,
expertise, or training in school
psychology, school counseling, or
school social work by a State or other
recognized entity.
Credentialed means an individual
who possesses credentialing as a school
psychologist, school counselor, or a
school social worker from a State-level
or nationally recognized organization.
LEAs that serve American Indian/
Alaska Native students means any LEAs
that are subject to the requirements of
section 8538 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7918).
LEA with demonstrated need means
an LEA that demonstrates need in
regard to mental health services for
students, resulting from high student to
mental health service provider ratios as
compared to other LEAs statewide or
nationally or negative impact on school
climate by pervasive violence, poverty,
substance abuse (including opioid
abuse), suicide, natural or manmade
disasters, or trafficking. LEAs may also
demonstrate a need if they have high
mental health service provider to
student ratios and have a significant
number of families deployed in the
military.
Licensed means an individual has a
license that represents a State’s legal
authority for that individual to serve as
a school-based mental health service
professional.
Local educational agency means a
public board of education or other
public authority legally constituted
within a State for either administrative
control or direction of, or to perform a
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
32028
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
service function for, public elementary
schools or secondary schools in a city,
county, township, school district, or
other political subdivision of a State, or
of or for a combination of school
districts or counties that is recognized
in a State as an administrative agency
for its public elementary schools or
secondary schools.
(a) The term includes any other public
institution or agency having
administrative control and direction of
a public elementary school or secondary
school.
(b) The term includes an elementary
school or secondary school funded by
the Bureau of Indian Education but only
to the extent that including the school
makes the school eligible for programs
for which specific eligibility is not
provided to the school in another
provision of law and the school does not
have a student population that is
smaller than the student population of
the LEA receiving assistance under the
ESEA with the smallest student
population, except that the school shall
not be subject to the jurisdiction of any
SEA other than the Bureau of Indian
Education.
(c) The term includes educational
service agencies and consortia of those
agencies.
(d) The term includes the SEA in a
State in which the SEA is the sole
educational agency for all public
schools.
Logic model (also referred to as a
theory of action) means a framework
that identifies key project components
of the proposed project (i.e., the active
‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to
be critical to achieving the relevant
outcomes) and describes the theoretical
and operational relationships among the
key project components and relevant
outcomes.
Project component means an activity,
strategy, intervention, process, product,
practice, or policy included in a project.
Evidence may pertain to an individual
project component or to a combination
of project components (e.g., training
teachers on instructional practices for
English learners and follow-on coaching
for these teachers).
Recruitment means strategies that
help attract professionals into positions
that are otherwise hard to fill or at a
level where demand exceeds supply,
including by doing at least two of the
following—
(a) Providing an annual stipend for
school-based mental health service
providers who maintain an active
national certification;
(b) Payment towards the school loans
accrued by the school-based mental
health service provider;
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
(c) Creating pathways to grant
credentialing reciprocity for schoolbased mental health service providers
across State lines; and
(d) Incentives and supports to help
mitigate shortages, such as increased
pay and other monetary incentives, the
creation of formal respecialization
programs, availability of distance
learning, development of internship
programs, and monetary incentives for
relocation to high-need areas.
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key
project component is designed to
improve, consistent with the specific
goals of the program.
Respecialization means strategies that
promote the readiness of mental health
service providers who already have
training as social workers, counselors,
psychologists, or other related fields to
serve in K–12 schools, such as by—
(a) Revising, updating, or streamlining
requirements for such individuals so
that additional training or other
requirements focus only on incremental
training needed for working in a K–12
school;
(b) Leveraging technological
innovations such as online and distance
learning; or
(c) Offering flexible options for
completing training that leads such
professionals to meet State
requirements; or
(d) Establishing new State-level
programs that provide alternate means
of certification, licensure, or
credentialing for such professionals,
including through practical or on-thejob training.
Retention means strategies to help
ensure that qualified individuals stay in
their position to avoid gaps in service
and empty positions, including by—
(a) Providing opportunities for
advancement or leadership; and
(b) Offering incentives and supports
to help mitigate shortages, such as
increased pay and other monetary
incentives, the creation of formal
respecialization programs, availability
of distance learning, development of
internship programs, or monetary
incentives for relocation to high-need
areas.
School-based mental health service
provider means a State-licensed or
State-certified school counselor, school
psychologist, school social worker, or
other State-licensed or certified mental
health professional qualified under
State law to provide mental health
services to children and adolescents and
with school-based mental health
services licensing, certification, or
training specifically to work in K–12
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
schools, including those who are
qualified to offer telehealth services.
State educational agency means the
agency primarily responsible for the
State supervision of public elementary
or secondary schools.
Telehealth means the use of electronic
information and telecommunication
technologies to support long-distance
clinical health care, patient and
professional health-related education,
public health, and health
administration.
Well-trained means a school-based
mental health service provider who
maintains up-to-date State certification
and/or State licensure, credentialing
them to provide school-based mental
health services to students.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking:
Under the Administrative Procedure Act
(5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally
offers interested parties the opportunity
to comment on proposed priorities,
definitions, and requirements. Section
437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the
Secretary to exempt from rulemaking
requirements regulations governing the
first grant competition under a new or
substantially revised program authority.
This is the first grant competition for
this program under title IV, part F,
subpart 3 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7281)
and therefore qualifies for this
exemption. In order to ensure timely
grant awards, the Secretary has decided
to forgo public comment on the
priorities, definitions, and requirements
under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
priorities, definitions, and requirements
will apply to the FY 2020 grant
competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Program Authority: Section
4631(a)(1)(B) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7281).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97, 98, and
99. (b) The Office of Management and
Budget Guidelines to Agencies on
Governmentwide Debarment and
Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR
part 180, as adopted and amended as
regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3485. (c) The Uniform
Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for
Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d)
The Administrative Priorities. (e) The
Opportunity Zones NFP.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
Estimated Available Funds:
$10,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$1,500,000 to 2,500,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$2,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice.
Project Period: 60 months.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program requires an annual 25 percent
cost sharing or matching from State,
local, or private resources.
The Secretary does not, as a general
matter, anticipate waiving this
requirement in the future. Furthermore,
given the importance of matching funds
to the long-term success of the project,
eligible entities must identify
appropriate matching funds in the
proposed budget.
3. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This
program involves supplement-notsupplant funding requirements. See
‘‘Application Requirements’’ in
Section I.
4. Subgrantees: Under 34 CFR
75.708(b) and (c) a grantee under this
competition may award subgrants—to
directly carry out project activities
described in its application—to the
following types of entities: LEAs. The
grantee may award subgrants to entities
it has identified in an approved
application or that it selects through a
competition under procedures
established by the grantees. However, a
grantee is not required to award
subgrants and may instead administer
the program directly.
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an
application. Grants.gov has relaxed the
requirement for applicants to have an
active registration in the System for
Award Management (SAM) in order to
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
apply for funding during the COVID–19
pandemic. An applicant that does not
have an active SAM registration can still
register with Grants.gov, but must
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll-free, at 1–800–518–4726, in order to
take advantage of this flexibility.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. However, under 34 CFR
79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental
review in order to make awards by the
end of FY 2020.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference
regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice. In
addition, we remind applicants that
section 4001(b) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7101) prohibits the use of funds for
medical services or drug treatment or
rehabilitation, except for integrated
student supports, specialized
instructional support services, or
referral to treatment for impacted
students, which may include students
who are victims of, or witnesses to,
crime or who illegally use drugs. This
prohibition does not preclude the use of
funds to support mental health
counseling and support services,
including those provided by a mental
health service provider outside of
school, so long as such services are not
medical.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for this program are from 34 CFR
75.210. The maximum score for all
selection criteria is 100 points. The
points assigned to each criterion are
indicated in parentheses. Non-Federal
peer reviewers will evaluate and score
each application program narrative
against the following selection criteria:
(a) Need for the Project (10 points).
The Secretary considers the need for
the proposed project. In determining the
need for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have
been identified and will be addressed by
the proposed project, including the
nature and magnitude of those gaps or
weaknesses.
(b) Quality of Project Personnel (30
points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project. In determining
the quality of project personnel, the
Secretary considers the extent to which
the applicant encourages applications
for employment from persons who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
32029
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability.
(2) In addition, the Secretary
considers:
(i) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel.
(ii) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of
project consultants or subcontractors.
(c) Quality of the Project Services (30
points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project. In determining the
quality of the services to be provided by
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the quality and sufficiency of
strategies for ensuring equal access and
treatment for eligible project
participants who are members of groups
that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or
disability.
(2) In addition, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
training or professional development
services to be provided by the proposed
project are likely to alleviate the
personnel shortages that have been
identified or are the focus of the
proposed project.
(d) Adequacy of Resources (15
points).
(1) The Secretary considers the
adequacy of resources for the proposed
project.
(2) In determining the adequacy of
resources for the proposed project, the
Secretary considers:
(i) The relevance and demonstrated
commitment of each partner in the
proposed project to the implementation
and success of the project.
(ii) The potential for continued
support of the project after Federal
funding ends, including, as appropriate,
the demonstrated commitment of
appropriate entities to such support.
(iii) The potential for the
incorporation of project purposes,
activities, or benefits into the ongoing
program of the agency or organization at
the end of Federal funding.
(e) Quality of the Management Plan
(15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
adequacy of mechanisms for ensuring
high-quality products and services from
the proposed project.
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
32030
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this program the Department conducts a
review of the risks posed by applicants.
Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the Secretary may
impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk
conditions on a grant if the applicant or
grantee is not financially stable; has a
history of unsatisfactory performance;
has a financial or other management
system that does not meet the standards
in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through the System for
Award Management. You may review
and comment on any information about
yourself that a Federal agency
previously entered and that is currently
in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee or
subgrantee that is awarded competitive
grant funds must have a plan to
disseminate these public grant
deliverables. This dissemination plan
can be developed and submitted after
your application has been reviewed and
selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing
requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting:
(a) If you apply for a grant under this
competition, you must ensure that you
have in place the necessary processes
and systems to comply with the
reporting requirements in 2 CFR part
170 should you receive funding under
this competition. This does not apply if
you have an exception under 2 CFR
170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The
Department has established the
following Government Performance and
Results Act of 1993 performance
measures for the School-Based Mental
Health Services Grant Program:
(a) The number of school-based
mental health service providers
recruited as a result of the grant.
(b) The number of school-based
mental health service providers retained
as a result of the grant.
(c) The reduction in the ratio of
students to mental health service
providers for each LEA with
demonstrated need served by the grant.
(d) The increase in the number of
school-based mental health service
providers hired annually for each LEA
with a demonstrated need served by the
grant compared with the average
number of such providers hired in each
LEA in the 5 years prior to receiving the
grant.
(e) The reduction in the annual
attrition rate of school-based mental
health service providers for each LEA
with a demonstrated need served by the
grant compared with the average
attrition rate of such providers in each
LEA in the 5 years prior to receiving the
grant.
These measures constitute the
Department’s indicators of success for
this program. Consequently, we advise
an applicant for a grant under this
program to give careful consideration to
these measures in conceptualizing the
approach for its proposed project plan.
Each grantee will be required to
provide, in its annual performance and
final reports, data about its progress in
meeting these measures. This data will
be considered by the Department in
making potential continuation awards.
Consistent with 34 CFR 75.591,
grantees funded under this program
must meet the requirements of any
evaluation of the program conducted by
the Department or an evaluator selected
by the Department.
Performance measure targets: The
applicant must propose annual targets
for the measures listed above in their
application. Applicants must also
provide the following information as
directed under 34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 103 / Thursday, May 28, 2020 / Notices
(1) An explanation of how each
proposed performance target is
achievable compared to the baseline for
the performance measure.
(2) An explanation of the data
collection and reporting methods the
applicant would use and why those
methods are likely to yield reliable,
valid, and meaningful performance data;
and
(3) An explanation of the applicant’s
capacity to collect and report reliable,
valid, and meaningful performance data,
as evidenced by high-quality data
collection, analysis, and reporting in
other projects or research.
Note: If the applicant does not have
experience with collection and reporting of
performance data through other projects or
research, the applicant should provide other
evidence of capacity to successfully carry out
data collection and reporting for its proposed
project.
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
The reviewers of each application will
score related selection criteria on the
basis of how well an applicant has
considered these measures in
conceptualizing the approach and
evaluation of the project.
All grantees must submit an annual
performance report and final
performance report with information
that is responsive to these performance
measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets in
the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:32 May 27, 2020
Jkt 250001
32031
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Register notice. In addition, a later
Federal Register notice will describe
how to register to provide oral
comments at the meeting.
Agencies under Review and
Evaluation: The Department requests
written comments from the public on
the following accrediting agencies,
which are currently undergoing review
and evaluation by the Accreditation
Group, and which will be reviewed at
the Winter 2021 NACIQI meeting.
The agencies are listed by the type of
application each has submitted. We
have also indicated each agency’s
current scope of recognition. If any
agency requests a change to its scope of
recognition, we have identified both the
current scope of recognition and the
requested scope of recognition.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
Applications for Renewal of
Recognition
1. Association of Institutions of
Jewish Studies. Scope of Recognition:
The accreditation of postsecondary
institutions of Jewish Studies within the
United States exclusively offering
educational programs leading to a
certificate, associate degree,
baccalaureate degree or their equivalent
credential in Jewish Studies or Classical
Torah Studies.
2. American Speech-LanguageHearing Association, Council on
Academic Accreditation in Audiology
and Speech-Language Pathology. Scope
of Recognition: The accreditation and
preaccreditation (Accreditation
Candidate) throughout the United States
of education programs in audiology and
speech-language pathology leading to
the first professional or clinical degree
at the master’s or doctoral level, and the
accreditation of these programs offered
via distance education.
3. American Board of Funeral Service
Education, Committee on Accreditation.
Scope of Recognition: The accreditation
of institutions and programs within the
United States awarding diplomas,
associate degrees and bachelor’s degrees
in funeral service or mortuary science,
including the accreditation of distance
learning courses and programs offered
by these programs and institutions.
4. Council on Naturopathic Medical
Education. Scope of Recognition: The
accreditation and preaccreditation
throughout the United States of
graduate-level, four-year naturopathic
medical education programs leading to
the Doctor of Naturopathic Medicine
(NMD) or Doctor of Naturopathy (ND).
5. Commission on Massage Therapy
Accreditation. Scope of Recognition:
The accreditation of institutions and
programs in the United States that
award postsecondary certificates,
[FR Doc. 2020–11388 Filed 5–27–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Accrediting Agencies Currently
Undergoing Review for Purposes of
Recognition by the U.S. Secretary of
Education; Request for Comments
U.S. Department of Education,
Accreditation Group, Office of
Postsecondary Education.
ACTION: Call for written third-party
comments.
AGENCY:
This notice provides
information to members of the public on
submitting written comments for
accrediting agencies currently
undergoing review for purposes of
recognition by the U.S. Secretary of
Education.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Herman Bounds, Director, Accreditation
Group, Office of Postsecondary
Education, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
Room 270–01, Washington, DC 20202,
telephone: (202) 453–7615, or email:
herman.bounds@ed.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
request for written third-party
comments concerning the performance
of accrediting agencies under review by
the Secretary of Education is required
by section 496(n)(1)(A) of the Higher
Education Act (HEA) of 1965, as
amended, and pertains to the Winter
2021 meeting of the National Advisory
Committee on Institutional Quality and
Integrity (NACIQI). The meeting date
and location have not been determined,
but will be announced in a later Federal
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 103 (Thursday, May 28, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 32025-32031]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11388]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; School-Based Mental Health Services
Grant Program
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for the School-Based
Mental Health Services Grant Program, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) number 84.184H. This notice relates to the approved
information collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: May 28, 2020.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: July 13, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject
to Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
However, under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental review in
order to make awards by the end of FY 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the address for obtaining and submitting an application,
please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Amy Banks, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, Room 3E257, Washington, DC 20202-
6450. Telephone: (202) 453-6704. Email:
[email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The School-Based Mental Health Services Grant
Program provides competitive grants to State educational agencies
(SEAs) to increase the number of qualified (i.e., licensed, certified,
well-trained, or credentialed, each as defined in this notice) mental
health service providers (service providers) providing school-based
mental health services to students in local educational agencies (LEAs)
with demonstrated need (as defined in this notice).
Background: In the Department's FY 2020 appropriations, Congress
increased funding for the School Safety National Activities program,
and included direction in the Explanatory Statement that $10 million be
used to increase the number of counselors, social workers,
psychologists, or other service providers who provide school-based
mental health services to students. Under this competition the
Department will award grants for that purpose. As indicated in the
absolute priority in this notice, the focus of these grants will be
increasing the number of service providers in LEAs with demonstrated
need (as defined in this notice) for these services to maximize the
impact given limited available funding. The Department recognizes the
enhanced need for these services and providers due to the Novel
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Supporting the mental health needs
of all students remains a key focus of the Administration, and these
grants will aid States and school districts in meeting their increasing
local needs.
Note: The provision of medical services by such service
providers is not an allowable use of funds under this grant.
Priorities: This notice contains one absolute priority and two
competitive preference priorities. We are establishing the absolute
priority, competitive preference priority 1, and part 3 of competitive
preference priority 2 for the FY 2020 School-Based Mental Health
Services Grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make
awards from the list of unfunded applications from this competition, in
accordance with section 437(d)(1) of the General Education Provisions
Act (GEPA), 20 U.S.C. 1232(d)(1). In accordance with 34 CFR
75.105(b)(2)(ii), part 1 of competitive preference priority 2 is from
the notice of final priorities published in the Federal Register on
March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative Priorities), and part 2 of
competitive preference priority 2 is from the notice of final priority
published in the Federal Register on November 27, 2019 (84 FR 65300)
(Opportunity Zones NFP).
Absolute Priority: For FY 2020 and any subsequent year in which we
make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, this priority is an absolute priority. Under 34 CFR
75.105(c)(3) we consider only applications that meet the absolute
priority.
This priority is:
Absolute Priority: To increase the number of qualified school-based
mental health service providers in LEAs with demonstrated need.
To meet this priority, SEAs must propose to increase the number of
qualified school counselors, school social workers, school
psychologists, or other mental health professionals, including those
who provide services remotely (telehealth), by implementing plans to
address the recruitment and retention of service providers in LEAs with
demonstrated need. To meet this priority, applicants must propose plans
that include both recruitment and retention.
1. Recruitment (as defined in this notice) of school-based mental
health providers for services in LEAs with demonstrated need.
An applicant must propose a plan to increase the number of service
providers, including service providers who offer telehealth services,
serving students in LEAs with demonstrated need, such as through
payment towards student loan repayments for those service providers,
promoting cross-State licensing and certification reciprocity for
service providers, or providing incentives for hiring, such as
increased pay or flexibility or creating hybrid roles that allow for
leadership, academic, or research opportunities, or induction programs.
2. Retention (as defined in this notice) of existing school-based
mental health service providers in LEAs with demonstrated need.
An applicant must also propose a plan to improve the likelihood
that qualified service providers providing services in LEAs with
demonstrated need remain in such LEAs over time. Such a plan might
include career pathways programs, recognition and award programs,
mentorship programs, or incentives or payment towards student loan
repayment for continued service and should include considerations for
service providers who offer telehealth services.
3. Demonstration of fiscal control. The applicant must propose
plans that demonstrate it will ensure appropriate
[[Page 32026]]
administrative and fiscal control of grant funds.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities. Under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i) we award up to an additional
fifteen points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1, and an additional five points to an applicant that meets
one or more areas within Competitive Preference Priority 2.
Applicants may choose whether or not to address the competitive
preference priorities. An applicant must clearly indicate in the
abstract section of the application if it addresses the competitive
preference priorities. When applying under competitive preference
priority 2, the applicant must provide relevant information in the
abstract, including the name of LEA(s) or school(s) it proposes to
serve and their locale code, Census tract, or status as an ``affected
LEA'' under ESEA section 8538.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Respecialization of Existing
Mental Health Service Providers to Qualify Them for Work in LEAs with
Demonstrated Need (up to 15 points).
To meet this priority, an applicant must propose a respecialization
plan that promotes the readiness of service providers who already have
training as social workers, counselors, psychologists, or other related
fields by supporting incremental training needed for working in a K-12
school and that increases the number of service providers who will be
qualified to serve in LEAs with demonstrated need. This can be done by
one or more of the following--
(a) Revising, updating, or streamlining requirements for such
individuals so that additional training or other requirements focus
only on the incremental training needed;
(b) Leveraging technological innovations such as online and
distance learning;
(c) Offering flexible options for completing training that leads
such professionals to meet State requirements; or--
(d) Establishing new State-level programs that provide alternate
means of certification, licensure, or credentialing for such
professionals, including through practical or on-the-job training. Such
approaches must promote readiness to serve in LEAs.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Rural Applicants; Spurring
Investment in Qualified Opportunity Zones; or American Indian/Alaska
Native Tribal Applicants (0 or 5 points).
Under this priority, an applicant must demonstrate one or more of
the following:
1. Rural Applicants.
(a) The applicant proposes to serve a community that is served by
one or more LEAs with a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43; or
(b) The applicant proposes a project in which a majority of the
schools served have a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43.
Note: Applicants are encouraged to retrieve locale codes from
the NCES School District search tool (nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/), where LEAs can be looked up individually to
retrieve locale codes, and Public School search tool (nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/), where individual schools can be looked up to
retrieve locale codes.
2. Spurring Investment in Qualified Opportunity Zones. The area in
which the applicant proposes to provide services overlaps with a
Qualified Opportunity Zone, as designated by the Secretary of the
Treasury under section 1400Z-1 of the Internal Revenue Code. An
applicant must--
(a) Provide the census tract number of the Qualified Opportunity
Zone(s) in which it proposes to provide services; and
(b) Describe how the applicant will provide services in the
Qualified Opportunity Zone(s).
Note: A list of Qualified Opportunity Zones, including relevant
census tract numbers, is available at www.cdfifund.gov/Pages/Opportunity-Zones.aspx.
Applicants may also determine whether a particular area overlaps
with a qualified opportunity zone using the National Center of
Education Statistics map located at https://nces.ed.gov/programs/maped/LocaleLookup/.
3. Serving one or more LEA(s) that serve American Indian/Alaska
Native students (as defined in this notice). To meet this part of the
priority, an SEA must demonstrate that it is focusing the proposed
project on one or more LEAs that predominantly serve members of one or
more federally recognized Tribe(s). The applicant must specify the LEA
or LEAs that meet this part of the competitive preference priority.
Note: While an applicant may meet Competitive Preference
Priority 2 in more than one way, an applicant receives no more than
5 points for meeting this priority.
Requirements: We are establishing these application and program
requirements for the FY 2020 grant competition and any subsequent year
in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from
this competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20
U.S.C. 1232(d)(1).
Application Requirements: In its application, an applicant must
describe the following:
(a) Severity and magnitude of the problem and how it will identify
and select LEAs with demonstrated need to be served by the proposed
plan.
LEAs with demonstrated need are K-12 LEAs that are experiencing
need in regard to mental health services for students, resulting from
high student to mental health service provider ratios as compared to
other LEAs statewide or nationally or LEAs in which the school climate
is negatively impacted by pervasive violence, poverty, substance abuse
(including opioid abuse), suicide, natural or manmade disasters, or
trafficking. LEAs may also demonstrate a need if they have high mental
health service provider to student ratios and have a significant number
of families deployed in the military.
Applicants must describe the lack of school-based service providers
and its effect on students in LEAs to be served by the grant.
Applicants must also describe the nature of the problem for the LEA(s),
based on information including, but not limited to, the most recent
available ratios of service providers to students enrolled in LEAs
designated by the SEA to benefit from the School-Based Mental Health
Services Grant Program, provided in the aggregate and disaggregated by
profession (e.g., school social workers, school psychologists, school
counselors) as compared to local, State, or national data. The
description may also include LEA-level or school-level demographic
data, school climate surveys, school violence/crime data, data related
to suicide rates, and descriptions of barriers to hiring and retaining
service providers in these LEAs.
(b) Logic model.
The applicant must describe its approach to increase the number of
qualified service providers using a logic model (as defined in this
notice), including the key project components and relevant outcomes
(each as defined in this notice). The description should indicate how
the approach taken under this program will update or expand on any
previous approach and how such new approach will take into
consideration the previous barriers.
(c) Detailed project budget, including matching funds.
To promote the sustainability of the school-based mental health
services, all applicants must include matching funds in the amount of
at least 25 percent in their budgets. Budgets must describe
[[Page 32027]]
both how the applicant will meet the 25 percent matching requirement
under this grant, and the source of the funds, such as State, local, or
private resources (see Section III). In addition, the budget must
specify the portion of funds that will be used for respecialization, if
applicable. In total, administrative costs, including funding for
State-level or LEA-level administrative updates that promote
respecialization, if applicable, may not exceed 10 percent of the
annual grant award.
(d) Number of providers.
Applicants must include the most recent available data on the
number of service providers, disaggregated by profession (e.g., school
social workers, school psychologists, school counselors) and the
projected number of service providers they will place into employment
in the identified LEAs for each year of the plan using funds from this
grant or matching funds, including the unduplicated number of service
providers offering telehealth services.
(e) A plan for collaboration and coordination with related Federal,
State, and local organizations and initiatives.
Applicants must describe how they intend to collaborate with State,
regional, and local organizations, such as school social worker
associations, school psychologist associations, school counselor
associations, or colleges or universities, and describe their
relationship and coordination with regional and local mental health,
public health, child welfare, and other community agencies, to achieve
plan goals and objectives of increasing the number of school-based
mental health service providers in LEAs with demonstrated need.
Applicants may also describe proposed coordination with existing
federally funded efforts related to elementary and secondary school
counseling and mental health promotion. If such coordination will
occur, applicants must identify which Federal program(s) they are
coordinating with and how such coordination will promote program
success across multiple programs.
(f) Planned use of grant funds to supplement, and not supplant,
existing school-based mental health services funds and to expand, not
duplicate, efforts to increase the number of providers.
Applicants must describe how project funds will supplement, and not
supplant, non-Federal funds that would otherwise be available for
activities funded under this program.
Applicants must describe how they will use the School-Based Mental
Health Services Grant Program funds to expand, rather than duplicate,
existing, ongoing, or new efforts to increase the number of service
providers in LEAs with demonstrated need that are qualified to provide
school-based mental health services, including providers offering
telehealth services, and how the plan will integrate existing funding
streams and efforts to support the plan.
(g) Options for provision of student mental health services via
secure telehealth services.
If an applicant proposes to allow LEAs to offer telehealth services
to provide school-based mental health services, the applicant must
describe the steps it will require the selected LEA(s) to take in order
to ensure that any service provider offering telehealth services does
so in a manner consistent with the Family Educational Rights and
Privacy Act (FERPA) and the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act
(IDEA), as well as all applicable Federal, State, and local laws and
ethical obligations and ethical requirements and profession-specific
ethical obligations. Under FERPA, LEAs must ensure that reasonable
methods are used to protect personally identifiable information (PII)
from the education records of students (including health records)
maintained by the school or LEA. The description of the provision of
telehealth mental health services to students must also include
proposed methods to ensure equitable access and compliance with
applicable privacy requirements (including FERPA, and the Individuals
with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)), and identify proposed
technology platforms, and plans for the collection, maintenance and use
or sharing of any PII and student data.
(h) Plan for emergency response.
Applicants must also describe how they will ensure service
providers have emergency response plans in place if students threaten
harm to self or others.
(i) How the SEA determines the selected LEA(s) are prepared to
immediately implement services to address student need.
Applicants must describe how they will determine that each selected
LEA is prepared to effectively utilize the service provider(s) to
address student need.
Program Requirements:
(a) Applicants that receive an award under this program must ensure
that any service provider hired under this grant is qualified to work
in K-12 schools, including a provider that offers telehealth services.
(b) Applicants that receive an award under this program must ensure
that any service provider offering telehealth services does so in a
manner consistent with FERPA and all applicable Federal, State, and
local laws and ethical obligations and ethical requirements.
Definitions: We are establishing the following definitions in this
notice for the FY 2020 grant competition and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications from this
competition, in accordance with section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, 20 U.S.C.
1232(d)(1): ``certified,'' ``credentialed,'' ``LEA with demonstrated
need,'' ``LEAs that serve American Indian/Alaska Native students,''
``licensed,'' ``recruitment,'' ``respecialization,'' ``retention,''
``school-based mental health service provider,'' ``telehealth,'' and
``well-trained.'' The following definitions are from 34 CFR 77.1:
``logic model,'' ``project component,'' and ``relevant outcome.'' The
following definitions are included for the convenience of the reader:
``local educational agency'' from 20 U.S.C. 7801(30), and ``State
educational agency'' from 20 U.S.C. 7801(49).
Certified means an individual has documented verification of
education, expertise, or training in school psychology, school
counseling, or school social work by a State or other recognized
entity.
Credentialed means an individual who possesses credentialing as a
school psychologist, school counselor, or a school social worker from a
State-level or nationally recognized organization.
LEAs that serve American Indian/Alaska Native students means any
LEAs that are subject to the requirements of section 8538 of the ESEA
(20 U.S.C. 7918).
LEA with demonstrated need means an LEA that demonstrates need in
regard to mental health services for students, resulting from high
student to mental health service provider ratios as compared to other
LEAs statewide or nationally or negative impact on school climate by
pervasive violence, poverty, substance abuse (including opioid abuse),
suicide, natural or manmade disasters, or trafficking. LEAs may also
demonstrate a need if they have high mental health service provider to
student ratios and have a significant number of families deployed in
the military.
Licensed means an individual has a license that represents a
State's legal authority for that individual to serve as a school-based
mental health service professional.
Local educational agency means a public board of education or other
public authority legally constituted within a State for either
administrative control or direction of, or to perform a
[[Page 32028]]
service function for, public elementary schools or secondary schools in
a city, county, township, school district, or other political
subdivision of a State, or of or for a combination of school districts
or counties that is recognized in a State as an administrative agency
for its public elementary schools or secondary schools.
(a) The term includes any other public institution or agency having
administrative control and direction of a public elementary school or
secondary school.
(b) The term includes an elementary school or secondary school
funded by the Bureau of Indian Education but only to the extent that
including the school makes the school eligible for programs for which
specific eligibility is not provided to the school in another provision
of law and the school does not have a student population that is
smaller than the student population of the LEA receiving assistance
under the ESEA with the smallest student population, except that the
school shall not be subject to the jurisdiction of any SEA other than
the Bureau of Indian Education.
(c) The term includes educational service agencies and consortia of
those agencies.
(d) The term includes the SEA in a State in which the SEA is the
sole educational agency for all public schools.
Logic model (also referred to as a theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes.
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component or to a combination of
project components (e.g., training teachers on instructional practices
for English learners and follow-on coaching for these teachers).
Recruitment means strategies that help attract professionals into
positions that are otherwise hard to fill or at a level where demand
exceeds supply, including by doing at least two of the following--
(a) Providing an annual stipend for school-based mental health
service providers who maintain an active national certification;
(b) Payment towards the school loans accrued by the school-based
mental health service provider;
(c) Creating pathways to grant credentialing reciprocity for
school-based mental health service providers across State lines; and
(d) Incentives and supports to help mitigate shortages, such as
increased pay and other monetary incentives, the creation of formal
respecialization programs, availability of distance learning,
development of internship programs, and monetary incentives for
relocation to high-need areas.
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program.
Respecialization means strategies that promote the readiness of
mental health service providers who already have training as social
workers, counselors, psychologists, or other related fields to serve in
K-12 schools, such as by--
(a) Revising, updating, or streamlining requirements for such
individuals so that additional training or other requirements focus
only on incremental training needed for working in a K-12 school;
(b) Leveraging technological innovations such as online and
distance learning; or
(c) Offering flexible options for completing training that leads
such professionals to meet State requirements; or
(d) Establishing new State-level programs that provide alternate
means of certification, licensure, or credentialing for such
professionals, including through practical or on-the-job training.
Retention means strategies to help ensure that qualified
individuals stay in their position to avoid gaps in service and empty
positions, including by--
(a) Providing opportunities for advancement or leadership; and
(b) Offering incentives and supports to help mitigate shortages,
such as increased pay and other monetary incentives, the creation of
formal respecialization programs, availability of distance learning,
development of internship programs, or monetary incentives for
relocation to high-need areas.
School-based mental health service provider means a State-licensed
or State-certified school counselor, school psychologist, school social
worker, or other State-licensed or certified mental health professional
qualified under State law to provide mental health services to children
and adolescents and with school-based mental health services licensing,
certification, or training specifically to work in K-12 schools,
including those who are qualified to offer telehealth services.
State educational agency means the agency primarily responsible for
the State supervision of public elementary or secondary schools.
Telehealth means the use of electronic information and
telecommunication technologies to support long-distance clinical health
care, patient and professional health-related education, public health,
and health administration.
Well-trained means a school-based mental health service provider
who maintains up-to-date State certification and/or State licensure,
credentialing them to provide school-based mental health services to
students.
Waiver of Proposed Rulemaking: Under the Administrative Procedure
Act (5 U.S.C. 553), the Department generally offers interested parties
the opportunity to comment on proposed priorities, definitions, and
requirements. Section 437(d)(1) of GEPA, however, allows the Secretary
to exempt from rulemaking requirements regulations governing the first
grant competition under a new or substantially revised program
authority. This is the first grant competition for this program under
title IV, part F, subpart 3 of the ESEA (20 U.S.C. 7281) and therefore
qualifies for this exemption. In order to ensure timely grant awards,
the Secretary has decided to forgo public comment on the priorities,
definitions, and requirements under section 437(d)(1) of GEPA. These
priorities, definitions, and requirements will apply to the FY 2020
grant competition and any subsequent year in which we make awards from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Program Authority: Section 4631(a)(1)(B) of the ESEA (20 U.S.C.
7281).
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in
2 CFR part 180, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department
in 2 CFR part 3485. (c) The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost
Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part
200, as adopted and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR
part 3474. (d) The Administrative Priorities. (e) The Opportunity Zones
NFP.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
[[Page 32029]]
Estimated Available Funds: $10,000,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $1,500,000 to 2,500,000.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $2,000,000.
Estimated Number of Awards: 5.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice.
Project Period: 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants: SEAs.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program requires an annual 25
percent cost sharing or matching from State, local, or private
resources.
The Secretary does not, as a general matter, anticipate waiving
this requirement in the future. Furthermore, given the importance of
matching funds to the long-term success of the project, eligible
entities must identify appropriate matching funds in the proposed
budget.
3. Supplement-Not-Supplant: This program involves supplement-not-
supplant funding requirements. See ``Application Requirements'' in
Section I.
4. Subgrantees: Under 34 CFR 75.708(b) and (c) a grantee under this
competition may award subgrants--to directly carry out project
activities described in its application--to the following types of
entities: LEAs. The grantee may award subgrants to entities it has
identified in an approved application or that it selects through a
competition under procedures established by the grantees. However, a
grantee is not required to award subgrants and may instead administer
the program directly.
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768), and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
Grants.gov has relaxed the requirement for applicants to have an active
registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to apply
for funding during the COVID-19 pandemic. An applicant that does not
have an active SAM registration can still register with Grants.gov, but
must contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll-free, at 1-800-518-4726,
in order to take advantage of this flexibility.
2. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79. However,
under 34 CFR 79.8(a), we waive intergovernmental review in order to
make awards by the end of FY 2020.
3. Funding Restrictions: We reference regulations outlining funding
restrictions in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice. In
addition, we remind applicants that section 4001(b) of the ESEA (20
U.S.C. 7101) prohibits the use of funds for medical services or drug
treatment or rehabilitation, except for integrated student supports,
specialized instructional support services, or referral to treatment
for impacted students, which may include students who are victims of,
or witnesses to, crime or who illegally use drugs. This prohibition
does not preclude the use of funds to support mental health counseling
and support services, including those provided by a mental health
service provider outside of school, so long as such services are not
medical.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria: The selection criteria for this program are
from 34 CFR 75.210. The maximum score for all selection criteria is 100
points. The points assigned to each criterion are indicated in
parentheses. Non-Federal peer reviewers will evaluate and score each
application program narrative against the following selection criteria:
(a) Need for the Project (10 points).
The Secretary considers the need for the proposed project. In
determining the need for the proposed project, the Secretary considers
the extent to which specific gaps or weaknesses in services,
infrastructure, or opportunities have been identified and will be
addressed by the proposed project, including the nature and magnitude
of those gaps or weaknesses.
(b) Quality of Project Personnel (30 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will
carry out the proposed project. In determining the quality of project
personnel, the Secretary considers the extent to which the applicant
encourages applications for employment from persons who are members of
groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
(2) In addition, the Secretary considers:
(i) The qualifications, including relevant training and experience,
of key project personnel.
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of project consultants or subcontractors.
(c) Quality of the Project Services (30 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the quality of the services to be
provided by the proposed project. In determining the quality of the
services to be provided by the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the quality and sufficiency of strategies for ensuring equal
access and treatment for eligible project participants who are members
of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented based on race,
color, national origin, gender, age, or disability.
(2) In addition, the Secretary considers the extent to which the
training or professional development services to be provided by the
proposed project are likely to alleviate the personnel shortages that
have been identified or are the focus of the proposed project.
(d) Adequacy of Resources (15 points).
(1) The Secretary considers the adequacy of resources for the
proposed project.
(2) In determining the adequacy of resources for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers:
(i) The relevance and demonstrated commitment of each partner in
the proposed project to the implementation and success of the project.
(ii) The potential for continued support of the project after
Federal funding ends, including, as appropriate, the demonstrated
commitment of appropriate entities to such support.
(iii) The potential for the incorporation of project purposes,
activities, or benefits into the ongoing program of the agency or
organization at the end of Federal funding.
(e) Quality of the Management Plan (15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the adequacy of
mechanisms for ensuring high-quality products and services from the
proposed project.
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the
[[Page 32030]]
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past performance
of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as the
applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this program the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through the System for Award Management. You may
review and comment on any information about yourself that a Federal
agency previously entered and that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting:
(a) If you apply for a grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170 should you
receive funding under this competition. This does not apply if you have
an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
5. Performance Measures: The Department has established the
following Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 performance
measures for the School-Based Mental Health Services Grant Program:
(a) The number of school-based mental health service providers
recruited as a result of the grant.
(b) The number of school-based mental health service providers
retained as a result of the grant.
(c) The reduction in the ratio of students to mental health service
providers for each LEA with demonstrated need served by the grant.
(d) The increase in the number of school-based mental health
service providers hired annually for each LEA with a demonstrated need
served by the grant compared with the average number of such providers
hired in each LEA in the 5 years prior to receiving the grant.
(e) The reduction in the annual attrition rate of school-based
mental health service providers for each LEA with a demonstrated need
served by the grant compared with the average attrition rate of such
providers in each LEA in the 5 years prior to receiving the grant.
These measures constitute the Department's indicators of success
for this program. Consequently, we advise an applicant for a grant
under this program to give careful consideration to these measures in
conceptualizing the approach for its proposed project plan. Each
grantee will be required to provide, in its annual performance and
final reports, data about its progress in meeting these measures. This
data will be considered by the Department in making potential
continuation awards.
Consistent with 34 CFR 75.591, grantees funded under this program
must meet the requirements of any evaluation of the program conducted
by the Department or an evaluator selected by the Department.
Performance measure targets: The applicant must propose annual
targets for the measures listed above in their application. Applicants
must also provide the following information as directed under 34 CFR
75.110(b) and (c):
[[Page 32031]]
(1) An explanation of how each proposed performance target is
achievable compared to the baseline for the performance measure.
(2) An explanation of the data collection and reporting methods the
applicant would use and why those methods are likely to yield reliable,
valid, and meaningful performance data; and
(3) An explanation of the applicant's capacity to collect and
report reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data, as evidenced
by high-quality data collection, analysis, and reporting in other
projects or research.
Note: If the applicant does not have experience with collection
and reporting of performance data through other projects or
research, the applicant should provide other evidence of capacity to
successfully carry out data collection and reporting for its
proposed project.
The reviewers of each application will score related selection
criteria on the basis of how well an applicant has considered these
measures in conceptualizing the approach and evaluation of the project.
All grantees must submit an annual performance report and final
performance report with information that is responsive to these
performance measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020-11388 Filed 5-27-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P