Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018, 31740-31742 [2020-11324]

Download as PDF 31740 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 27, 2020 / Notices Dated: May 20, 2020. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. Dial: 888–394–8218, Conference ID: 7031317. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brooke Peery, DFO, at bpeery@usccr.gov or (202) 701–1376. Members of the public may listen to this discussion through the above call in number. An open comment period will be provided to allow members of the public to make a statement as time allows. The conference call operator will ask callers to identify themselves, the organization they are affiliated with (if any), and an email address prior to placing callers into the conference room. Callers can expect to incur regular charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, according to their wireless plan. The Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over land-line connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877– 8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number. Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments; the comments must be received in the regional office within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Regional Programs Unit, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 230 S. Dearborn, Suite 2120, Chicago, IL 60604. They may also be faxed to the Commission at (312) 353–8324, or emailed to Corrine Sanders at csanders@ usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact the Regional Programs Unit at (312) 353– 8311. Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit Office, as they become available, both before and after the meeting. Records of the meeting will be available via www.facadatabase.gov under the Commission on Civil Rights, Oklahoma Advisory Committee link. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, http:// www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. [FR Doc. 2020–11295 Filed 5–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda I. Welcome & Roll Call II. Approval of Minutes III. Discuss on Potential Project Prompts IV. Public Comment VI. Adjournment VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 May 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS Notice of Public Meeting of the Wyoming Advisory Committee U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. ACTION: Announcement of meeting. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA) that the meeting of the Wyoming Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will be held at 2:00 p.m. (MDT) Tuesday, June 16, 2020. The purpose of the meeting is for the committee to review their report on hate crimes. DATES: Tuesday, June 16, 2020 at 2:00 p.m. MDT Public Call Information: Dial: 800–367–2403 Conference ID: 7782673 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ana Victoria Fortes, Designated Federal Officer (DFO) at afortes@usccr.gov or (202) 681–0857 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting is available to the public through the following toll-free call-in number: 800–367–2403, conference ID number: 7782673. Any interested member of the public may call this number and listen to the meeting. Callers can expect to incur charges for calls they initiate over wireless lines, and the Commission will not refund any incurred charges. Callers will incur no charge for calls they initiate over landline connections to the toll-free telephone number. Persons with hearing impairments may also follow the proceedings by first calling the Federal Relay Service at 1–800–877–8339 and providing the Service with the conference call number and conference ID number. Members of the public are entitled to make comments during the open period at the end of the meeting. Members of the public may also submit written comments; the comments must be received in the Regional Programs Unit within 30 days following the meeting. Written comments may be mailed to the Western Regional Office, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Suite 2010, Los SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Angeles, CA 90012 or email Ana Victoria Fortes at afortes@usccr.gov. Records and documents discussed during the meeting will be available for public viewing prior to and after the meetings at https:// www.facadatabase.gov/FACA/ FACAPublicViewCommitteeDetails?id= a10t0000001gzliAAA. Please click on ‘‘Committee Meetings’’ tab. Records generated from these meetings may also be inspected and reproduced at the Regional Programs Unit, as they become available, both before and after the meetings. Persons interested in the work of this Committee are directed to the Commission’s website, https://www.usccr.gov, or may contact the Regional Programs Unit at the above email or street address. Agenda I. Welcome II. Discuss Report III. Public Comment IV. Next Steps V. Adjournment Dated: May 20, 2020. David Mussatt, Supervisory Chief, Regional Programs Unit. [FR Doc. 2020–11294 Filed 5–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6335–01–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–201–836] Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Amended Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017–2018 Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico to correct a ministerial error. AGENCY: DATES: Applicable May 27, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt or John Conniff, AD/ CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–7851 or (202) 482–1009, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 27, 2020 / Notices Background On April 20, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published its Final Results of the 2017–2018 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico.1 On April 30, 2020, Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero), one of the respondents in this administrative review, timely submitted comments alleging a ministerial error in Commerce’s Final Results.2 Commerce is issuing this notice to correct the ministerial error raised by Maquilacero. Commerce is also issuing this notice to correct an inadvertent error in the Final Results related to Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa), a non-examined respondent in this administrative review. Specifically, Commerce granted a non-examined rate to Hylsa as well as to Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Ternium); however, Commerce failed to take into account the completion of a changed circumstances review on the antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico.3 In the changed circumstances review, Commerce determined that Ternium is the successor-in-interest to Hylsa.4 As such, effective August 18, 2009, Hylsa is entitled to Ternium’s antidumping duty cash deposit rate with respect to entries of subject merchandise, and only Ternium should have been assigned a non-examined rate in the Final Results. Legal Framework jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ‘‘errors in addition, subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type of unintentional error which the administering authority considers ministerial.’’ 5 With respect to final results of administrative reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ‘‘will analyze any comments received and, if appropriate, correct any 1 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final Determination of No Shipments; 2017–2018, 85 FR 21829 (April 20, 2020) (Final Results). 2 See Maquilacero’s Letter, ‘‘Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico; Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.’s Ministerial Error Comments for the Final Results,’’ dated April 30, 2020. 3 See Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, 74 FR 41680 (August 18, 2009). 4 Id. 5 See 19 CFR 351.224(f). VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 May 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 ministerial error by amending . . . the final results of review. . . .’’ Producer and/or exporter Ministerial Error Commerce committed an inadvertent, unintentional error within the meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with respect to an adjustment to Maquilacero’s total cost of manufacturing. Specifically, when reallocating certain costs for Maquilacero’s non-prime merchandise to its prime merchandise, we inadvertently relied upon a production quantity that included out-of-scope merchandise, and therefore overstated the adjustment to Maquilacero’s total cost of manufacturing for prime, inscope merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce determines that, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f), it made a ministerial error in the Final Results. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the calculation of the final weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Maquilacero, which changes from 3.12 percent to 2.82 percent.6 Furthermore, we are revising the review-specific weighted-average dumping margin applicable to the companies not selected for individual examination in this administrative review, which is based, in part, on Maquilacero’s weighted-average dumping margin. Amended Final Results of the Review As a result of correcting the ministerial error and the inadvertent error described above, Commerce determines that, for the period of August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2018, the following weighted-average dumping margins exist: 6 See Memorandum, ‘‘Ministerial Error Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2017– 2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico,’’ dated concurrently with this notice. 7 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Initiation and Expedited Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 82 FR 54322 (November 17, 2017), unchanged in LightWalled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 13475 (March 29, 2018) (determining that Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. is the successor-in-interest to Perfiles y Herrajes). 8 The weighted-average dumping margin for Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.’s (Regiopytsa), another mandatory respondent in this review, is unchanged from the Final Results. PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V .......................................... Arco Metal S.A. de C.V .............. Galvak, S.A. de C.V ................... Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles ...... Industrias Monterrey S.A. de C.V International de Aceros, S.A. de C.V .......................................... Maquilacero S.A. de C.V ............ Nacional de Acero S.A. de C.V .. PEASA-Productos Especializados de Acero ........ Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V.7 .......... Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V ............ Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V .................. Talleres Acero Rey S.A. de C.V Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V ...... Tuberia Laguna, S.A. de C.V ..... Tuberias Aspe ............................ Tuberias y Derivados S.A de C.V .......................................... 31741 Weightedaverage dumping margin (percent) 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 2.82 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 8 3.40 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 3.17 Disclosure We intend to disclose the calculation performed for these amended final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). Antidumping Duty Assessment Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final results of the administrative review. In accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), Maquilacero reported the entered value of its U.S. sales such that we calculated importerspecific ad valorem antidumping duty assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping calculated for the examined sales for each importer to the total entered value of the sales for each importer for which entered value was reported. Where an importerspecific rate is zero or de minimis within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties. For the companies which were not selected for individual examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at an ad valorem assessment rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin determined in these amended final results. The amended final results of this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1 31742 Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 102 / Wednesday, May 27, 2020 / Notices amended final results of this review and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.9 Commerce’s ‘‘automatic assessment’’ will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.10 Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective retroactively for all shipments of subject merchandise that entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after April 20, 2020, the date of publication of the Final Results of this administrative review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal to the weighted-average dumping margin established in these amended final results of review; (2) for producers or exporters not covered in this review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a firm covered in this review or another completed segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then the cash deposit rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this or any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash deposit rate will be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent established in the amended final determination of the less-than-fair-value investigation.11 These cash deposit 9 See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). 11 See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, the People’s Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping Duty Orders; Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45403 (August 5, 2008). jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES 10 For VerDate Sep<11>2014 16:59 May 26, 2020 Jkt 250001 requirements, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Importers This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of doubled antidumping duties. Administrative Protective Order This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation. Notification to Interested Parties The amended final results and notice are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(e). Dated: May 20, 2020. Jeffrey I. Kessler, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance. [FR Doc. 2020–11324 Filed 5–26–20; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–533–873] Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel From India: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value; Notice of Amended Final Determination Pursuant to Court Decision; and Notice of Revocation of Antidumping Duty Order, in Part Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On April 30, 2020, the United States Court of International Trade (the AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00007 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 CIT) sustained the final results of redetermination pertaining to the lessthan-fair-value (LTFV) investigation of certain cold-drawn mechanical tubing of carbon and alloy steel (cold-drawn mechanical tubing) from India. The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with the final determination in the LTFV investigation, and that Commerce is amending the final determination and resulting antidumping duty (AD) order with respect to the dumping margin assigned to Goodluck India Limited (Goodluck). We are also revoking the AD order, in part, with respect to Goodluck. DATES: Applicable May 10, 2020. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jerry Huang, AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4047. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On April 16, 2018, Commerce published its Final Determination in the LTFV investigation of cold-drawn mechanical tubing from India.1 In the Final Determination, Commerce applied a rate based on adverse facts available to Goodluck after finding that the company failed to accurately report product ‘‘control numbers’’ in its home market sales and cost of production databases.2 Although Goodluck attempted to submit new databases at the start of verification of Goodluck’s questionnaire responses, Commerce declined to accept the revised information, determining that such a revision did not constitute a ‘‘minor correction.’’ 3 On June 11, 2018, Commerce published its AD order on cold-drawn mechanical tubing from India.4 On August 13, 2019, the CIT remanded the Final Determination to Commerce and instructed Commerce to consider the revised databases provided 1 See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel from India: Final Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 83 FR 16296 (April 16, 2018) (Final Determination) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (IDM). 2 See IDM at Comments 1 and 2. 3 Id. at Comment 1. 4 See Certain Cold-Drawn Mechanical Tubing of Carbon and Alloy Steel From the People’s Republic of China, the Federal Republic of Germany, India, Italy, the Republic of Korea, and Switzerland: Antidumping Duty Orders; and Amended Final Determinations of Sales at Less Than Fair Value for the People’s Republic of China and Switzerland, 83 FR 26962 (June 11, 2018) (AD Order). E:\FR\FM\27MYN1.SGM 27MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 102 (Wednesday, May 27, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31740-31742]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11324]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-201-836]


Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube From Mexico: Amended Final 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2017-2018

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce (Commerce) is amending the final 
results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order 
on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from Mexico to correct a 
ministerial error.

DATES: Applicable May 27, 2020.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Samuel Brummitt or John Conniff, AD/
CVD Operations, Office III, Enforcement and Compliance, International 
Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution 
Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-7851 or (202) 
482-1009, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

[[Page 31741]]

Background

    On April 20, 2020, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) published 
its Final Results of the 2017-2018 administrative review of the 
antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from 
Mexico.\1\ On April 30, 2020, Maquilacero S.A. de C.V. (Maquilacero), 
one of the respondents in this administrative review, timely submitted 
comments alleging a ministerial error in Commerce's Final Results.\2\ 
Commerce is issuing this notice to correct the ministerial error raised 
by Maquilacero.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Final 
Determination of No Shipments; 2017-2018, 85 FR 21829 (April 20, 
2020) (Final Results).
    \2\ See Maquilacero's Letter, ``Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe 
and Tube from Mexico; Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.'s Ministerial Error 
Comments for the Final Results,'' dated April 30, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce is also issuing this notice to correct an inadvertent 
error in the Final Results related to Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa), a 
non-examined respondent in this administrative review. Specifically, 
Commerce granted a non-examined rate to Hylsa as well as to Ternium 
Mexico S.A. de C.V. (Ternium); however, Commerce failed to take into 
account the completion of a changed circumstances review on the 
antidumping duty order on light-walled rectangular pipe and tube from 
Mexico.\3\ In the changed circumstances review, Commerce determined 
that Ternium is the successor-in-interest to Hylsa.\4\ As such, 
effective August 18, 2009, Hylsa is entitled to Ternium's antidumping 
duty cash deposit rate with respect to entries of subject merchandise, 
and only Ternium should have been assigned a non-examined rate in the 
Final Results.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances 
Review: Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, 74 FR 
41680 (August 18, 2009).
    \4\ Id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Legal Framework

    A ministerial error, as defined in section 751(h) of the Tariff Act 
of 1930, as amended (the Act), includes ``errors in addition, 
subtraction, or other arithmetic function, clerical errors resulting 
from inaccurate copying, duplication, or the like, and any other type 
of unintentional error which the administering authority considers 
ministerial.'' \5\ With respect to final results of administrative 
reviews, 19 CFR 351.224(e) provides that Commerce ``will analyze any 
comments received and, if appropriate, correct any ministerial error by 
amending . . . the final results of review. . . .''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \5\ See 19 CFR 351.224(f).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ministerial Error

    Commerce committed an inadvertent, unintentional error within the 
meaning of section 751(h) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.224(f) with respect 
to an adjustment to Maquilacero's total cost of manufacturing. 
Specifically, when reallocating certain costs for Maquilacero's non-
prime merchandise to its prime merchandise, we inadvertently relied 
upon a production quantity that included out-of-scope merchandise, and 
therefore overstated the adjustment to Maquilacero's total cost of 
manufacturing for prime, in-scope merchandise. Accordingly, Commerce 
determines that, in accordance with section 751(h) of the Act and 19 
CFR 351.224(f), it made a ministerial error in the Final Results. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(e), Commerce is amending the Final Results 
to reflect the correction of this ministerial error in the calculation 
of the final weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Maquilacero, 
which changes from 3.12 percent to 2.82 percent.\6\ Furthermore, we are 
revising the review-specific weighted-average dumping margin applicable 
to the companies not selected for individual examination in this 
administrative review, which is based, in part, on Maquilacero's 
weighted-average dumping margin.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \6\ See Memorandum, ``Ministerial Error Memorandum for the Final 
Results of the 2017-2018 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico,'' dated 
concurrently with this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Amended Final Results of the Review

    As a result of correcting the ministerial error and the inadvertent 
error described above, Commerce determines that, for the period of 
August 1, 2017 through July 31, 2018, the following weighted-average 
dumping margins exist:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \7\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: 
Initiation and Expedited Preliminary Results of Changed 
Circumstances Review, 82 FR 54322 (November 17, 2017), unchanged in 
Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico: Final Results of 
Changed Circumstances Review, 83 FR 13475 (March 29, 2018) 
(determining that Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V. is the successor-in-
interest to Perfiles y Herrajes).
    \8\ The weighted-average dumping margin for Regiomontana de 
Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V.'s (Regiopytsa), another mandatory 
respondent in this review, is unchanged from the Final Results.

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                               Weighted-
                                                                average
                  Producer and/or exporter                      dumping
                                                                margin
                                                               (percent)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aceros Cuatro Caminos S.A. de C.V...........................        3.17
Arco Metal S.A. de C.V......................................        3.17
Galvak, S.A. de C.V.........................................        3.17
Grupo Estructuras y Perfiles................................        3.17
Industrias Monterrey S.A. de C.V............................        3.17
International de Aceros, S.A. de C.V........................        3.17
Maquilacero S.A. de C.V.....................................        2.82
Nacional de Acero S.A. de C.V...............................        3.17
PEASA-Productos Especializados de Acero.....................        3.17
Perfiles LM, S.A. de C.V.\7\................................        3.17
Productos Laminados de Monterrey S.A. de C.V................        3.17
Regiomontana de Perfiles y Tubos S.A. de C.V................    \8\ 3.40
Talleres Acero Rey S.A. de C.V..............................        3.17
Ternium Mexico S.A. de C.V..................................        3.17
Tuberia Laguna, S.A. de C.V.................................        3.17
Tuberias Aspe...............................................        3.17
Tuberias y Derivados S.A de C.V.............................        3.17
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclosure

    We intend to disclose the calculation performed for these amended 
final results in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b).

Antidumping Duty Assessment

    Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Commerce has determined, and U.S. Customs and Border 
Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate 
entries of subject merchandise in accordance with these amended final 
results of the administrative review. In accordance with 19 CFR 
351.212(b)(1), Maquilacero reported the entered value of its U.S. sales 
such that we calculated importer-specific ad valorem antidumping duty 
assessment rates based on the ratio of the total amount of dumping 
calculated for the examined sales for each importer to the total 
entered value of the sales for each importer for which entered value 
was reported. Where an importer-specific rate is zero or de minimis 
within the meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), Commerce will instruct CBP 
to liquidate the appropriate entries without regard to antidumping 
duties.
    For the companies which were not selected for individual 
examination, we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties at an ad 
valorem assessment rate equal to the weighted-average dumping margin 
determined in these amended final results. The amended final results of 
this review shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties 
on entries of merchandise covered by the

[[Page 31742]]

amended final results of this review and for future deposits of 
estimated duties, where applicable.\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \9\ See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Commerce's ``automatic assessment'' will apply to entries of 
subject merchandise during the POR produced by companies included in 
these final results of review for which the reviewed companies did not 
know that the merchandise they sold to the intermediary (e.g., a 
reseller, trading company, or exporter) was destined for the United 
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the all-others rate if there is no rate for the intermediate 
company(ies) involved in the transaction.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \10\ For a full discussion of this practice, see Antidumping and 
Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 
68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective 
retroactively for all shipments of subject merchandise that entered, or 
withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after April 20, 2020, 
the date of publication of the Final Results of this administrative 
review, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) The 
cash deposit rate for the companies listed above will be equal to the 
weighted-average dumping margin established in these amended final 
results of review; (2) for producers or exporters not covered in this 
review but covered in a prior segment of the proceeding, the cash 
deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate published 
for the most recently completed segment of this proceeding; (3) if the 
exporter is not a firm covered in this review or another completed 
segment of this proceeding, but the producer is, then the cash deposit 
rate will be the rate established for the most recently completed 
segment of this proceeding for the producer of the merchandise; and (4) 
if neither the exporter nor the producer is a firm covered in this or 
any previously completed segment of this proceeding, then the cash 
deposit rate will be the all-others rate of 3.76 percent established in 
the amended final determination of the less-than-fair-value 
investigation.\11\ These cash deposit requirements, when imposed, shall 
remain in effect until further notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \11\ See Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from Mexico, the 
People's Republic of China, and the Republic of Korea: Antidumping 
Duty Orders; Light-Walled Rectangular Pipe and Tube from the 
Republic of Korea: Notice of Amended Final Determination of Sales at 
Less Than Fair Value, 73 FR 45403 (August 5, 2008).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Importers

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 
regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation 
of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of doubled antidumping duties.

Administrative Protective Order

    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APO) of their responsibility 
concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under 
APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which continues to govern 
business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. 
Timely written notification of return or destruction of APO materials 
or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure 
to comply with the regulations and the terms of an APO is a 
sanctionable violation.

Notification to Interested Parties

    The amended final results and notice are issued and published in 
accordance with sections 751(h) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 
351.224(e).

    Dated: May 20, 2020.
Jeffrey I. Kessler,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2020-11324 Filed 5-26-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P