Applications for New Awards; Expanding Opportunity Through Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)--Grants to Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer Grants), 31165-31175 [2020-11047]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
End of Certification
Accordingly, the following products
and services are deleted from the
Procurement List:
Products
NSN(s)—Product Name(s):
MR 407—Bag, Shopping Tote, Laminated,
Large, ‘‘Live Well’’
MR 436—Laminated Bag, Small Holiday
Fun
MR 437—Laminated Bag, Small Rein Deer
Mandatory Source of Supply: Industries for
the Blind and Visually Impaired, Inc.,
West Allis, WI
Contracting Activity: Defense Commissary
Agency
Service
Service Type: Janitorial/Custodial
Mandatory for: NISE: East Building, North
Charleston, SC
Mandatory Source of Supply: Palmetto
Goodwill Services, North Charleston, SC
Contracting Activity: PUBLIC BUILDINGS
SERVICE, ACQUISITION DIVISION/
SERVICES BRANCH
Michael R. Jurkowski,
Deputy Director, Business & PL Operations.
[FR Doc. 2020–11095 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
[Docket No.: ED–2020–SCC–0048]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to the Office of
Management and Budget for Review
and Approval; Comment Request;
RSA–227, Annual Client Assistance
Program Performance Report
Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services (OSERS),
Department of Education (ED).
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, ED is
proposing an extension of an existing
information collection.
DATES: Interested persons are invited to
submit comments on or before June 22,
2020.
ADDRESSES: Written comments and
recommendations for proposed
information collection requests should
be sent within 30 days of publication of
this notice to www.reginfo.gov/public/
do/PRAMain. Find this particular
information collection request by
selecting ‘‘Department of Education’’
under ‘‘Currently Under Review,’’ then
check ‘‘Only Show ICR for Public
Comment’’ checkbox.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
specific questions related to collection
activities, please contact April Trice,
202–245–6074.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
The
Department of Education (ED), in
accordance with the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (PRA) (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)), provides the general
public and Federal agencies with an
opportunity to comment on proposed,
revised, and continuing collections of
information. This helps the Department
assess the impact of its information
collection requirements and minimize
the public’s reporting burden. It also
helps the public understand the
Department’s information collection
requirements and provide the requested
data in the desired format. ED is
soliciting comments on the proposed
information collection request (ICR) that
is described below. The Department of
Education is especially interested in
public comment addressing the
following issues: (1) Is this collection
necessary to the proper functions of the
Department; (2) will this information be
processed and used in a timely manner;
(3) is the estimate of burden accurate;
(4) how might the Department enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (5) how
might the Department minimize the
burden of this collection on the
respondents, including through the use
of information technology. Please note
that written comments received in
response to this notice will be
considered public records.
Title of Collection: RSA–227, Annual
Client Assistance Program Performance
Report.
OMB Control Number: 1820–0528.
Type of Review: An extension of an
existing information collection.
Respondents/Affected Public: State,
Local, and Tribal Governments.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Responses: 57.
Total Estimated Number of Annual
Burden Hours: 912.
Abstract: The Client Assistance
Program (CAP) Annual Performance
Report (Form RSA–227) will be used to
analyze and evaluate the CAP program
administered by eligible grantees in
states. CAP grantees provide
information to individuals with
disabilities regarding the services and
benefits available under the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
(Rehabilitation Act), as amended by
Title IV of the Workforce Innovation
and Opportunity Act (WIOA) and the
rights afforded them under Title I of the
Americans with Disabilities Act. In
addition, CAP grantees are authorized to
provide advocacy and legal
representation to individuals seeking or
receiving services under the
Rehabilitation Act, in order to resolve
disputes with programs providing such
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31165
services, including vocational
rehabilitation services. RSA uses the
form to meet specific data collection
requirements of Section 112 of the
Rehabilitation Act and its implementing
Federal Regulations at 34 CFR part 370.
CAP grantees must report annually
using the RSA–227, which is due on or
before December 30 each year.
The collection of information through
Form RSA–227 has enabled RSA to
furnish the President and Congress with
data on the provision of client
assistance services and has helped to
establish a sound basis for future
funding requests. Data is used to
indicate trends in the provision of
services from year-to-year, as well as
evaluate the effectiveness of eligible
grantees within individual states in
meeting annual priorities and
objectives.
The respondents to the RSA–227 is
the client assistance program in each
year. RSA received recommendations on
the initial development of the RSA–227,
including the frequency of reporting,
from the National Disability Rights
Network (NDRN), CAP programs, and
other advocacy groups to ensure that the
information requested could be
provided with minimal burden to the
respondents.
Dated: May 19, 2020.
Kate Mullan,
PRA Coordinator, Strategic Collections and
Clearance Governance and Strategy Division,
Office of Chief Data Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–11080 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards;
Expanding Opportunity Through
Quality Charter Schools Program
(CSP)—–Grants to Charter School
Developers for the Opening of New
Charter Schools and for the
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools (Developer
Grants)
Office of Elementary and
Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
The Department of Education
(Department) is issuing a notice inviting
applications for new awards for fiscal
year (FY) 2020 for CSP—Developer
Grants, Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance (CFDA) numbers 84.282B
(for the opening of new charter schools)
and 84.282E (for the replication and
expansion of high-quality charter
schools). This notice relates to the
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31166
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
approved information collection under
OMB control number 1894–0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: May 19, 2020.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply:
Applicants are strongly encouraged, but
not required, to submit a notice of intent
to apply by June 1, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information:
The Department will hold a preapplication meeting via webinar for
prospective applicants on Tuesday, May
26, 2020 from 2:00–4:00 p.m., Eastern
Time.
Deadline for Transmittal of
Applications: June 19, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental
Review: August 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for
obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common
Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary
Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019
(84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-201902-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf. Grants.gov
has relaxed the requirement for
applicants to have an active registration
in the System for Award Management
(SAM) in order to apply for funding
during the COVID–19 pandemic. An
applicant that does not have an active
SAM registration can still register with
Grants.gov, but must contact the
Grants.gov Support Desk, toll-free, at 1–
800–518–4726, in order to take
advantage of this flexibility.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Leslie Hankerson, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW,
room 3E117, Washington, DC 20202–
5970. Telephone: (202) 205–8524.
Email: charterschools@ed.gov.
If you use a telecommunications
device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay
Service (FRS), toll free, at 1–800–877–
8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The major
purposes of the CSP are to expand
opportunities for all students,
particularly traditionally underserved
students, to attend charter schools 1 and
meet challenging State academic
standards; provide financial assistance
for the planning, program design, and
initial implementation of public charter
schools; increase the number of highquality charter schools available to
1 Italicized
terms are defined in the Definitions
section of this notice.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
students across the United States;
evaluate the impact of charter schools
on student achievement, families, and
communities; share best practices
between charter schools and other
public schools; encourage States to
provide facilities support to charter
schools; and support efforts to
strengthen the charter authorizing
process.
CSP—Developer Grants are intended
to provide financial assistance for the
planning, program design, and initial
implementation of charter schools
through awarding CSP Grants to Charter
School Developers for the Opening of
New Charter Schools and for the
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools (also referred to
as Developer Grants). The Department
provides funds to charter school
developers on a competitive basis to
enable them to open new charter
schools (CFDA number 84.282B) or
replicate or expand high-quality charter
schools (CFDA number 84.282E).
Eligibility for a grant under this
competition is limited to charter school
developers in States that do not
currently have a CSP State Entity grant
(CFDA number 84.282A) under the
Elementary and Secondary Education
Act of 1965 (ESEA), as amended by the
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).2
Eligibility in a State with a CSP State
Educational Agency (SEA) grant under
the ESEA, as amended by the No Child
Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) (CFDA
number 84.282A), is limited to charter
school developers applying for grants
for the replication and expansion of
high-quality charter schools (CFDA
number 84.282E) and only if the
Department has not approved an
amendment to the SEA’s approved grant
application authorizing the SEA to make
subgrants for replication and expansion.
Charter schools that receive financial
assistance through Developer Grants
provide programs of elementary or
secondary education, or both, and may
also serve students in early childhood
education programs or postsecondary
students.
Background: This notice invites
applications from eligible applicants for
two types of grants: (1) Grants to Charter
School Developers for the Opening of
New Charter Schools (CFDA number
84.282B) and (2) Grants to Charter
School Developers for the Replication
and Expansion of High-Quality Charter
Schools (CFDA number 84.282E). Under
this competition, each CFDA number
constitutes its own funding category.
2 All references to the ESEA in this notice are to
the ESEA, as amended by the ESSA, unless
otherwise noted.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The Secretary intends to award grants
under each CFDA number for
applications that are sufficiently high
quality.
All charter schools receiving CSP
funds must meet the definition of a
‘‘charter school’’ in section 4310(2) of
the ESEA, including the requirements
that a charter school comply with nondiscrimination and privacy laws,
including the Age Discrimination Act of
1975, title VI of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, title IX of the Education
Amendments of 1972, section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990,
section 444 of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), part B of the
Individuals with Disabilities Education
Act (IDEA) (i.e., rights afforded to
children with disabilities and their
parents), and applicable State laws.
For more information on eligibility,
please see section III.1 of this notice.
Priorities: This notice includes five
competitive preference priorities.
Competitive Preference Priorities 1, 2, 3,
and 4 are from the notice of final
priorities, requirements, definitions, and
selection criteria (NFP) for this program
published in the Federal Register on
July 3, 2019 (84 FR 31726). Competitive
Preference Priority 5 is from the notice
of final priorities published in the
Federal Register on March 9, 2020 (85
FR 13640) (Administrative Priorities).
Note: In order to receive points under these
competitive preference priorities, the
applicant must identify the priority or
priorities that it is addressing and provide
documentation that supports the identified
competitive preference priority or priorities.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For
FY 2020 and any subsequent year in
which we make awards from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition, these priorities are
competitive preference priorities.
For CFDA number 84.282B, under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will award an
additional 7 points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1; up to an additional 7 points,
depending on how well the application
addresses Competitive Preference
Priority 2; up to an additional 5 points
to an application, depending on how
well the application addresses
Competitive Preference Priority 3; and
an additional 3 points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 5. The maximum number of
competitive preference priority points
an application for CFDA number
84.282B can receive under these
priorities is 22.
For CFDA number 84.282E, under 34
CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will award an
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
additional 7 points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1; up to an additional 7 points,
depending on how well the application
addresses Competitive Preference
Priority 2; up to an additional 5 points
to an application, depending on how
well the application addresses
Competitive Preference Priority 3; and
an additional 3 points to an application
that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 4. The maximum number of
competitive preference priority points
an application for CFDA number
84.282E can receive under these
priorities is 22.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1—
Rural Community. (0 or 7 points under
CFDA numbers 84.282B and 84.282E).
Under this priority, applicants must
propose to open a new charter school or
to replicate or expand a high-quality
charter school in a rural community.
Competitive Preference Priority 2—
Spurring Investment in Opportunity
Zones.
Under this priority, an applicant must
address one or both of the following
priority areas:
(a) Proposes to open a new charter
school or to replicate or expand a highquality charter school in a qualified
opportunity zone as designated by the
Secretary of the Treasury under section
1400Z–1 of the Internal Revenue Code,
as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs
Act (Pub. L. 115–97). (0 or 3 points
under CFDA numbers 84.282B and
84.282E)
In addressing paragraph (a) of this
priority, an applicant must provide the
census tract number of the qualified
opportunity zone in which it proposes
to open a new charter school or
replicate or expand a high-quality
charter school. A list of qualified
opportunity zones, with census tract
numbers, is available at
www.cdfifund.gov/Pages/OpportunityZones.aspx.
Note: Applicants may also determine
whether a particular area is part of a qualified
opportunity zone using the National Center
of Education Statistics’ map located at
https://nces.ed.gov/programs/maped/Locale
Lookup/.
(b) Provide evidence in its application
that it has received or will receive an
investment from a qualified opportunity
fund under section 1400Z–2 of the
Internal Revenue Code, as amended by
the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, for one or
more of the following, as needed to
open or to replicate or expand the
school:
(1) The acquisition (by purchase,
lease, donation, or otherwise) of an
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
interest (including an interest held by a
third party for the benefit of the school)
in improved or unimproved real
property;
(2) The construction of new facilities,
or the renovation, repair, or alteration of
existing facilities;
(3) The predevelopment costs
required to assess sites for purposes of
subparagraph (1) or (2); and
(4) The acquisition of other tangible
property.
In addressing paragraph (b) of this
priority, an applicant must identify the
qualified opportunity fund from which
it has received or will receive financial
assistance. (0 or 4 points under CFDA
numbers 84.282B and 84.282E)
Competitive Preference Priority 3—
Opening a New Charter School or
Replicating or Expanding a High-quality
Charter School to Serve Native
American Students. (Up to 5 points
under CFDA numbers 84.282B and
84.282E)
Under this priority, applicants must—
(a) Propose to open a new charter
school, or replicate or expand a highquality charter school, that—
(1) Utilizes targeted outreach and
recruitment in order to serve a high
proportion of Native American students,
consistent with nondiscrimination
requirements contained in the U.S.
Constitution and Federal civil rights
laws;
(2) Has a mission and focus that will
address the unique educational needs of
Native American students, such as
through the use of instructional
programs and teaching methods that
reflect and preserve Native American
language, culture, and history; and
(3) Has or will have a governing board
with a substantial percentage of
members who are members of Indian
Tribes or Native American organizations
located within the area to be served by
the new, replicated, or expanded
charter school;
(b) Submit a letter of support from at
least one Indian Tribe or Native
American organization located within
the area to be served by the new,
replicated, or expanded charter school;
and
(c) Meaningfully collaborate with the
Indian Tribe(s) or Native American
organization(s) from which the
applicant has received a letter of
support in a timely, active, and ongoing
manner with respect to the development
and implementation of the educational
program at the charter school.
Competitive Preference Priority 4—
Single School Operators. (0 or 3 points
under CFDA number 84.282E)
Under this priority, applicants must
provide evidence that the applicant
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31167
currently operates one, and only one,
charter school.
Competitive Preference Priority 5—
Applications from New Potential
Grantees. (0 or 3 points under CFDA
number 84.282B)
Under this priority, an applicant must
demonstrate that it has never received a
grant, including through membership in
a group application submitted in
accordance with 34 CFR 75.127–75.129,
under the program from which it seeks
funds.
Definitions:
The following definitions are from
sections 4310 and 8101 of the ESEA,
section 602 of the IDEA, 34 CFR 77.1,
and the NFP.
Ambitious means promoting
continued, meaningful improvement for
program participants or for other
individuals or entities affected by the
grant or representing a significant
advancement in the field of education
research, practices, or methodologies.
When used to describe a performance
target, whether a performance target is
ambitious depends upon the context of
the relevant performance measure and
the baseline for that measure. (34 CFR
77.1)
Authorized public chartering agency
means a State educational agency, local
educational agency, or other public
entity that has the authority pursuant to
State law and approved by the Secretary
to authorize or approve a charter school.
(Section 4310(1) of the ESEA)
Baseline means the starting point
from which performance is measured
and targets are set. (34 CFR 77.1)
Charter management organization
means a nonprofit organization that
operates or manages a network of
charter schools linked by centralized
support, operations, and oversight.
(Section 4310(3) of the ESEA)
Charter school means a public school
that—
(a) In accordance with a specific State
statute authorizing the granting of
charters to schools, is exempt from
significant State or local rules that
inhibit the flexible operation and
management of public schools, but not
from any rules relating to the other
requirements of this definition;
(b) Is created by a developer as a
public school, or is adapted by a
developer from an existing public
school, and is operated under public
supervision and direction;
(c) Operates in pursuit of a specific set
of educational objectives determined by
the school’s developer and agreed to by
the authorized public chartering agency;
(d) Provides a program of elementary
or secondary education, or both;
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31168
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
(e) Is nonsectarian in its programs,
admissions policies, employment
practices, and all other operations, and
is not affiliated with a sectarian school
or religious institution;
(f) Does not charge tuition;
(g) Complies with the Age
Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of
the Education Amendments of 1972,
section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.),
section 444 of GEPA (20 U.S.C. 1232g)
(commonly referred to as the ‘‘Family
Educational Rights and Privacy Act of
1974’’), and part B of the IDEA;
(h) Is a school to which parents
choose to send their children, and
that—
(1) Admits students on the basis of a
lottery, consistent with section
4303(c)(3)(A) of the ESEA, if more
students apply for admission than can
be accommodated; or
(2) In the case of a school that has an
affiliated charter school (such as a
school that is part of the same network
of schools), automatically enrolls
students who are enrolled in the
immediate prior grade level of the
affiliated charter school and, for any
additional student openings or student
openings created through regular
attrition in student enrollment in the
affiliated charter school and the
enrolling school, admits students on the
basis of a lottery as described in clause
(1);
(i) Agrees to comply with the same
Federal and State audit requirements as
do other elementary schools and
secondary schools in the State, unless
such State audit requirements are
waived by the State;
(j) Meets all applicable Federal, State,
and local health and safety
requirements;
(k) Operates in accordance with State
law;
(l) Has a written performance contract
with the authorized public chartering
agency in the State that includes a
description of how student performance
will be measured in charter schools
pursuant to State assessments that are
required of other schools and pursuant
to any other assessments mutually
agreeable to the authorized public
chartering agency and the charter
school; and
(m) May serve students in early
childhood education programs or
postsecondary students. (Section
4310(2) of the ESEA)
Child with a disability means—
(a) In general—
The term ‘‘child with a disability’’
means a child—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
(i) With intellectual disabilities,
hearing impairments (including
deafness), speech or language
impairments, visual impairments
(including blindness), serious emotional
disturbance (referred to in this title as
‘‘emotional disturbance’’), orthopedic
impairments, autism, traumatic brain
injury, other health impairments, or
specific learning disabilities; and
(ii) Who, by reason thereof, needs
special education and related services.
(b) Child aged 3 through 9—The term
‘‘child with a disability’’ for a child aged
3 through 9 (or any subset of that age
range, including ages 3 through 5), may,
at the discretion of the State and the
local educational agency, include a
child—
(i) Experiencing developmental
delays, as defined by the State and as
measured by appropriate diagnostic
instruments and procedures, in 1 or
more of the following areas: physical
development; cognitive development;
communication development; social or
emotional development; or adaptive
development; and
(ii) Who, by reason thereof, needs
special education and related services.
(Section 8101(4) of the ESEA and
section 602 of the IDEA)
Demonstrates a rationale means a key
project component included in the
project’s logic model is informed by
research or evaluation findings that
suggest the project component is likely
to improve relevant outcomes. (34 CFR
77.1)
Developer means an individual or
group of individuals (including a public
or private nonprofit organization),
which may include teachers,
administrators and other school staff,
parents, or other members of the local
community in which a charter school
project will be carried out. (Section
4310(5) of the ESEA)
Educationally disadvantaged student
means a student in one or more of the
categories described in section
1115(c)(2) of the ESEA, which include
children who are economically
disadvantaged, children with
disabilities, migrant students, English
learners, neglected or delinquent
students, homeless students, and
students who are in foster care. (NFP)
English learner, when used with
respect to an individual, means an
individual—
(a) Who is aged 3 through 21;
(b) Who is enrolled or preparing to
enroll in an elementary school or
secondary school;
(c)(1) Who was not born in the United
States or whose native language is a
language other than English;
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(2)(i) Who is a Native American or
Alaska Native, or a native resident of the
outlying areas; and
(ii) Who comes from an environment
where a language other than English has
had a significant impact on the
individual’s level of English language
proficiency; or
(3) Who is migratory, whose native
language is a language other than
English, and who comes from an
environment where a language other
than English is dominant; and
(d) Whose difficulties in speaking,
reading, writing, or understanding the
English language may be sufficient to
deny the individual—
(1) The ability to meet the challenging
State academic standards;
(2) The ability to successfully achieve
in classrooms where the language of
instruction is English; or
(3) The opportunity to participate
fully in society. (Section 8101(20) of the
ESEA)
Expand, when used with respect to a
high-quality charter school, means to
significantly increase enrollment or add
one or more grades to the high-quality
charter school. (Section 4310(7) of the
ESEA)
High proportion, when used to refer to
Native American students, means a factspecific, case-by-case determination
based upon the unique circumstances of
a particular charter school or proposed
charter school. The Secretary considers
‘‘high proportion’’ to include a majority
of Native American students. In
addition, the Secretary may determine
that less than a majority of Native
American students constitutes a ‘‘high
proportion’’ based on the unique
circumstances of a particular charter
school or proposed charter school, as
described in the application for funds.
(NFP)
High-quality charter school means a
charter school that—
(a) Shows evidence of strong
academic results, which may include
strong student academic growth, as
determined by a State;
(b) Has no significant issues in the
areas of student safety, financial and
operational management, or statutory or
regulatory compliance;
(c) Has demonstrated success in
significantly increasing student
academic achievement, including
graduation rates where applicable, for
all students served by the charter
school; and
(d) Has demonstrated success in
increasing student academic
achievement, including graduation rates
where applicable, for each of the
subgroups of students, as defined in
section 1111(c)(2) of the ESEA, except
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
that such demonstration is not required
in a case in which the number of
students in a group is insufficient to
yield statistically reliable information or
the results would reveal personally
identifiable information about an
individual student. (Section 4310(8) of
the ESEA)
Indian Tribe means a federally
recognized or a State-recognized Tribe.
(NFP)
Institution of higher education means
an educational institution in any State
that—
(a) Admits as regular students only
persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing
secondary education, or the recognized
equivalent of such a certificate, or
persons who meet the requirements of
section 484(d) of the HEA;
(b) Is legally authorized within such
State to provide a program of education
beyond secondary education;
(c) Provides an educational program
for which the institution awards a
bachelor’s degree or provides not less
than a 2-year program that is acceptable
for full credit toward such a degree, or
awards a degree that is acceptable for
admission to a graduate or professional
degree program, subject to review and
approval by the Secretary;
(d) Is a public or other nonprofit
institution; and
(e) Is accredited by a nationally
recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an
institution that has been granted preaccreditation status by such an agency
or association that has been recognized
by the Secretary for the granting of preaccreditation status, and the Secretary
has determined that there is satisfactory
assurance that the institution will meet
the accreditation standards of such an
agency or association within a
reasonable time. (NFP)
Logic model (also referred to as theory
of action) means a framework that
identifies key project components of the
proposed project (i.e., the active
‘‘ingredients’’ that are hypothesized to
be critical to achieving the relevant
outcomes) and describes the theoretical
and operational relationships among the
key project components and relevant
outcomes. (34 CFR 77.1)
Native American means an Indian
(including an Alaska Native), as defined
in section 6132(b)(2) of the ESEA,
Native Hawaiian, or Native American
Pacific Islander. (NFP)
Native American language means the
historical, traditional languages spoken
by Native Americans. (NFP)
Native American organization means
an organization that—
(a) Is legally established—
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
(1) By Tribal or inter-Tribal charter or
in accordance with State or Tribal law;
and
(2) With appropriate constitution, bylaws, or articles of incorporation;
(b) Includes in its purposes the
promotion of the education of Native
Americans;
(c) Is controlled by a governing board,
the majority of which is Native
American;
(d) If located on an Indian reservation,
operates with the sanction or by charter
of the governing body of that
reservation;
(e) Is neither an organization or
subdivision of, nor under the direct
control of, any institution of higher
education; and
(f) Is not an agency of State or local
government. (NFP)
Performance measure means any
quantitative indicator, statistic, or
metric used to gauge program or project
performance. (34 CFR 77.1)
Performance target means a level of
performance that an applicant would
seek to meet during the course of a
project or as a result of a project. (34
CFR 77.1)
Project component means an activity,
strategy, intervention, process, product,
practice, or policy included in a project.
Evidence may pertain to an individual
project component (e.g., training
teachers or instructional practices for
English learners and follow-on coaching
for these teachers). (34 CFR 77.1)
Relevant outcome means the student
outcome(s) or other outcome(s) the key
project component is designed to
improve, consistent with the specific
goals of the program. (34 CFR 77.1)
Replicate, when used with respect to
a high-quality charter school, means to
open a new charter school, or a new
campus of a high-quality charter school,
based on the educational model of an
existing high-quality charter school,
under an existing charter or an
additional charter, if permitted or
required by State law. (Section 4310(9)
of the ESEA)
Rural community is a community
served by one or more local educational
agencies (LEAs) (a) with a locale code of
32, 33, 41, 42, or 43; or (b) that include
a majority of schools with a locale code
of 32, 33, 41, 42, or 43. Applicants are
encouraged to retrieve locale codes from
the National Center for Education
Statistics School District search tool
(https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/),
where LEAs can be looked up
individually to retrieve locale codes,
and Public School search tool (https://
nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/), where
individual schools can be looked up to
retrieve locale codes. (NFP)
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31169
Application Requirements:
Applications for CSP Developer Grant
funds must address the following
application requirements. These
requirements are from the NFP and
section 4303(f) 3 of the ESEA. The
source of each requirement is provided
in parentheses following each
requirement. Except as otherwise
provided, an applicant may choose to
respond to each requirement separately
or in the context of the applicant’s
responses to the selection criteria in
section V.1 of this notice.
Grants to Charter School Developers
for the Opening of New Charter Schools
(CFDA number 84.282B) and for the
Replication and Expansion of HighQuality Charter Schools (CFDA number
84.282E).
Applicants for grants under CFDA
number 84.282B or 84.282E must
address the following application
requirements. An applicant must
respond to the requirements in
paragraph (a) in a stand-alone section of
the application or in an appendix.
(a) Describe the eligible applicant’s
objectives in running a quality charter
school program and how the program
will be carried out, including—
(1) How the eligible applicant will
ensure that charter schools receiving
funds under this program meet the
educational needs of their students,
including children with disabilities and
English learners (Section
4303(f)(1)(A)(x) of the ESEA);
(2) The roles and responsibilities of
eligible applicants, partner
organizations, and charter management
organizations, including the
administrative and contractual roles and
responsibilities of such partners
(Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(I) of the ESEA);
(3) The quality controls agreed to
between the eligible applicant and the
authorized public chartering agency
involved, such as a contract or
performance agreement, how a school’s
performance in the State’s
accountability system and impact on
student achievement (which may
include student academic growth) will
be one of the most important factors for
renewal or revocation of the school’s
charter, and how the authorized public
chartering agency involved will reserve
the right to revoke or not renew a
school’s charter based on financial,
3 Under section 4305(c) of the ESEA, Developer
Grants must have the same terms and conditions as
grants awarded to State entities under section 4303.
For clarity, with respect to requirements that derive
from section 4303 the Department has, as
applicable, omitted the term ‘‘State entity’’ or
replaced it with ‘‘eligible applicant.’’ In addition,
the Department has replaced ‘‘State entity’s
program’’ and ‘‘subgrant,’’ respectively, with
‘‘program’’ and ‘‘grant.’’
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31170
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
structural, or operational factors
involving the management of the school
(Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(II) of the ESEA);
(4) How the autonomy and flexibility
granted to a charter school is consistent
with the definition of a charter school
in section 4310 of the ESEA (Section
4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(III) of the ESEA);
(5) How the eligible applicant will
solicit and consider input from parents
and other members of the community
on the implementation and operation of
each charter school that will receive
funds under the grant (Section
4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(IV) of the ESEA);
(6) The eligible applicant’s planned
activities and expenditures of grant
funds to support the activities described
in section 4303(b)(1) of the ESEA, and
how the eligible applicant will maintain
financial sustainability after the end of
the grant period (Section
4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(V) of the ESEA);
(7) How the eligible applicant will
support the use of effective parent,
family, and community engagement
strategies to operate each charter school
that will receive funds under the grant
(Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(VI) of the
ESEA); and
(8) How the eligible applicant will
ensure that each charter school
receiving funds under this program has
considered and planned for the
transportation needs of the school’s
students (Section 4303(f)(1)(E) of the
ESEA).
(b) Describe the educational program
that the applicant will implement in the
charter school receiving funding under
this program, including—
(1) Information on how the program
will enable all students to meet the
challenging State academic standards;
(2) The grade levels or ages of
students who will be served; and
(3) The instructional practices that
will be used. (NFP)
(c) Describe how the applicant will
ensure that the charter school that will
receive funds will recruit, enroll, and
retain students, including educationally
disadvantaged students, which include
children with disabilities and English
learners. (NFP)
(d) Describe the lottery and
enrollment procedures that the
applicant will use for the charter school
if more students apply for admission
than can be accommodated and, if the
applicant proposes to use a weighted
lottery, how the weighted lottery
complies with section 4303(c)(3)(A) of
the ESEA. (NFP)
(e) Provide a complete logic model (as
defined in 34 CFR 77.1) for the grant
project. The logic model must include
the applicant’s objectives for
implementing a new charter school or
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
replicating or expanding a high-quality
charter school with funding under this
competition. (NFP)
(f) Provide a budget narrative, aligned
with the activities, target grant project
outputs, and outcomes described in the
logic model, that outlines how grant
funds will be expended to carry out
planned activities. (NFP)
(g) If the applicant proposes to open
a new charter school (CFDA number
84.282B) or proposes to replicate or
expand a high-quality charter school
(CFDA number 84.282E) that provides a
single-sex educational program,
demonstrate that the proposed singlesex educational programs are in
compliance with the title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972 (20
U.S.C. 1681, et seq.) (‘‘Title IX’’) and its
implementing regulations, including 34
CFR 106.34. (NFP)
(h) Provide the applicant’s most
recent available independently audited
financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. (NFP)
(i) Provide—
(1) A request and justification for
waivers of any Federal statutory or
regulatory provisions that the eligible
entity believes are necessary for the
successful operation of the charter
school to be opened or to be replicated
or expanded; and
(2) A description of any State or local
rules, generally applicable to public
schools, that will be waived or
otherwise not apply to the school that
will receive funds. (NFP)
(j) Describe how each school that will
receive funds meets the definition of
charter school under section 4310(2) of
the ESEA. (NFP)
Grants for the Replication and
Expansion of High-Quality Charter
Schools (CFDA number 84.282E).
In addition to the preceding
application requirements, applicants for
grants under CFDA number 84.282E
must—
(a) For each charter school currently
operated or managed by the applicant,
provide—
(1) Information that demonstrates that
the school is treated as a separate school
by its authorized public chartering
agency and the State, including for
purposes of accountability and reporting
under title I, part A of the ESEA;
(2) Student assessment results for all
students and for each subgroup of
students described in section 1111(c)(2)
of the ESEA;
(3) Attendance and student retention
rates for the most recently completed
school year and, if applicable, the most
recent available four-year adjusted
cohort graduation rates and extended-
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
year adjusted cohort graduation rates;
and
(4) Information on any significant
compliance and management issues
encountered within the last three school
years by the existing charter school
being operated or managed by the
eligible entity, including in the areas of
student safety and finance. (NFP)
Assurances:
Applicants for CSP Developer Grants
must provide the following assurances.
These assurances are from section
4303(f) of the ESEA. The source of each
assurance is provided in parentheses
following each assurance.
Applicants for funds under this
program must provide assurances that—
(a) Each charter school receiving
funds through this program will have a
high degree of autonomy over budget
and operations, including autonomy
over personnel decisions (Section
4303(f)(2)(A) of the ESEA);
(b) The eligible applicant will support
charter schools in meeting the
educational needs of their students, as
described in section 4303(f)(1)(A)(x) of
the ESEA (Section 4303(f)(2)(B) of the
ESEA); and
(c) The eligible applicant will ensure
that each charter school receiving funds
under this program makes publicly
available, consistent with the
dissemination requirements of the
annual State report card under section
1111(h) of the ESEA, including on the
website of the school, information to
help parents make informed decisions
about the education options available to
their children, including—
(i) Information on the educational
program;
(ii) Student support services;
(iii) Parent contract requirements (as
applicable), including any financial
obligations or fees;
(iv) Enrollment criteria (as
applicable); and
(v) Annual performance and
enrollment data for each of the
subgroups of students, as defined in
section 1111(c)(2) of the ESEA, except
that such disaggregation of performance
and enrollment data shall not be
required in a case in which the number
of students in a group is insufficient to
yield statically reliable information or
the results would reveal personally
identifiable information about an
individual student. (Section
4303(f)(2)(G) of the ESEA)
Program Authority: Title IV, part C of
the ESEA, as amended.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The
Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR
parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84, 86, 97,
98, and 99. (b) The Office of
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
Management and Budget Guidelines to
Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as
adopted and amended as regulations of
the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative
Requirements, Cost Principles, and
Audit Requirements for Federal Awards
in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended as regulations of the
Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
NFP. (e) The Administrative Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79
apply to all applicants except federally
recognized Indian Tribes.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds:
$7,500,000.
Contingent upon the availability of
funds and the quality of applications,
we may make additional awards in
subsequent years from the list of
unfunded applications from this
competition.
Estimated Range of Awards:
$150,000—$300,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards:
$225,000 per year.
Maximum Award: See Reasonable
and Necessary Costs in section III.4. for
information regarding the maximum
amount of funds that may be awarded
per new school seat and per new school.
Estimated Number of Awards: 12–25.
Note: The Department is not bound by any
estimates in this notice. The estimated range
and average size of awards are based on a
single 12-month budget period. We may use
available funds to support multiple 12-month
budget periods for one or more grantees.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
Eligible applicants are developers that
have—
(a) Applied to an authorized public
chartering authority to operate a charter
school; and
(b) Provided adequate and timely
notice to that authority. (Section 4310(6)
of the ESEA).
Additionally, the charter school must
be located in a State with a State statute
specifically authorizing the
establishment of charter schools (as
defined in section 4310(2) of the ESEA)
and in which a State entity currently
does not have a CSP State Entity grant
(CFDA number 84.282A) under section
4303 of the ESEA.4 (Section 4305(a)(2)
4 States in which a State entity currently has an
approved CSP State Entity grant application under
section 4303 of the ESEA that is actively running
subgrant competitions are Alabama, Arizona,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
of the ESEA) Eligibility in a State with
a CSP SEA grant (CFDA 84.282A) under
the ESEA, as amended by NCLB, is
limited to grants for replication and
expansion 5 (CFDA 84.282E) and only if
the Department has not approved an
amendment to the SEA’s approved grant
application authorizing the SEA to make
subgrants for replication and
expansion.6
As a general matter, the Secretary
considers charter schools that have been
in operation for more than five years to
be past the initial implementation phase
and, therefore, ineligible to receive CSP
funds under CFDA number 84.282B to
support the opening of a new charter
school or under CFDA number 84.282E
for the replication of a high-quality
charter school; however, such schools
may receive CSP funds under CFDA
number 84.282E for the expansion of a
high-quality charter school.
Note: If an applicant has applied to an
authorized public chartering agency to
operate a new school and has not yet been
approved, it must include in its application,
a dated copy of its application to the
authorized public chartering agency, and
information addressing the plan and timeline
to receive notification from the authorizer on
the final decision. Additionally, an applicant
should delineate any costs in its proposed
budget that are projected to be incurred prior
to the date the applicant’s charter school
application is approved by the authorized
public chartering agency.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This
program does not require cost sharing or
matching.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this
competition may not award subgrants to
entities to directly carry out project
activities described in its application.
Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana,
Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas,
Washington, and Wisconsin. We will not consider
applications from applicants in these States under
either CFDA 84.282B or 84.282E.
5 States in which the SEA currently has an
approved CSP SEA grant application under the
ESEA, as amended by NCLB (i.e., a grant award
made in fiscal year 2016 or earlier), are California,
District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana,
Massachusetts, Nevada, Ohio, South Carolina, and
Tennessee. We will not consider applications from
applicants in these States for grants for the opening
of new charter schools submitted under CFDA
number 84.282B.
6 States in which the SEA currently has an
approved CSP SEA grant application under the
ESEA, as amended by NCLB (i.e., a grant award
made in fiscal year 2016 or earlier), and have
approved amendment requests that authorize the
SEA to make subgrants for replication and
expansion, are California, District of Columbia,
Massachusetts, Nevada, and Ohio. We will not
consider applications from applicants in these
States for grants for the replication or expansion of
high-quality charter schools under CFDA 84.282E
either.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31171
4. Reasonable and Necessary Costs:
The Secretary may elect to impose
maximum limits on the amount of grant
funds that may be awarded for a new
charter school, or replicated, or
expanded, high-quality charter school.
For this competition, the maximum
limit of grant funds that may be
awarded for a new, replicated, or
expanded charter school is $1,500,000.
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.404,
applicants must ensure that all costs
included in the proposed budget are
reasonable and necessary in light of the
goals and objectives of the proposed
project. Any costs determined by the
Secretary to be unreasonable or
unnecessary will be removed from the
final approved budget.
A charter school that previously has
received CSP funds for replication or
expansion or for planning or initial
implementation of a charter school
under CFDA number 84.282A or
84.282M (under the ESEA) may not use
funds under this grant for the same
purpose. However, such charter school
may be eligible to receive funds under
this competition to expand the charter
school beyond the existing grade levels
or student count and beyond the grade
levels or projected student count
provided in the previous CSP award.
Likewise, a charter school that receives
funds under this competition is
ineligible to receive funds for the same
purpose under section 4303(b)(1) or
4305(b) of the ESEA, including opening
and preparing for the operation of a new
charter school, opening and preparing
for the operation of a replicated highquality charter school, or expanding a
high-quality charter school (i.e., CFDA
number 84.282A or 84.282M).
IV. Application and Submission
Information
1. Application Submission
Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for
Applicants to Department of Education
Discretionary Grant Programs,
published in the Federal Register on
February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and
available at www.govinfo.gov/content/
pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf,
which contain requirements and
information on how to submit an
application. Grants.gov has relaxed the
requirement for applicants to have an
active registration in SAM in order to
apply for funding during the COVID–19
pandemic. An applicant that does not
have an active SAM registration can still
register with Grants.gov, but must
contact the Grants.gov Support Desk,
toll-free, at 1–800–518–4726, in order to
take advantage of this flexibility.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31172
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
2. Submission of Proprietary
Information: Given the types of projects
that may be proposed in applications for
this competition, your application may
include business information that you
consider proprietary.
In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ‘‘business
information’’ and describe the process
we use in determining whether any of
that information is proprietary and,
thus, protected from disclosure under
Exemption 4 of the Freedom of
Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as
amended).
Because we plan to make successful
applications available to the public, you
may wish to request confidentiality of
business information.
Consistent with Executive Order
12600, please designate in your
application any information that you
believe is exempt from disclosure under
Exemption 4. In the appropriate
Appendix section of your application,
under ‘‘Other Attachments Form,’’
please list the page number or numbers
on which we can find this information.
For additional information please see 34
CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This
competition is subject to Executive
Order 12372 and the regulations in 34
CFR part 79. Information about
Intergovernmental Review of Federal
Programs under Executive Order 12372
is in the application package for this
program.
4. Funding Restrictions: Grantees
must use the grant funds to open and
prepare for the operation of a new
charter school; to open and prepare for
the operation of a replicated highquality charter school; or to expand a
high-quality charter school, as
applicable. Grant funds must be used to
carry out allowable activities, described
in section 4303(h) of the ESEA, which
include the following:
(a) Preparing teachers, school leaders,
and specialized instructional support
personnel, including through paying the
costs associated with—
(1) Providing professional
development; and
(2) Hiring and compensating, during
the eligible applicant’s planning period
specified in the application for funds,
one or more of the following:
(i) Teachers.
(ii) School leaders.
(iii) Specialized instructional support
personnel.
(b) Acquiring supplies, training,
equipment (including technology), and
educational materials (including
developing and acquiring instructional
materials).
(c) Carrying out necessary renovations
to ensure that a new school building
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
complies with applicable statutes and
regulations, and minor facilities repairs
(excluding construction).
(d) Providing one-time, startup costs
associated with providing transportation
to students to and from the charter
school.
(e) Carrying out community
engagement activities, which may
include paying the cost of student and
staff recruitment.
(f) Providing for other appropriate,
non-sustained costs related to the
opening of new charter schools, or the
replication or expansion of high-quality
charter schools, as applicable, when
such costs cannot be met from other
sources.
A grant awarded by the Secretary
under this competition may be for a
period of not more than five years, of
which the grantee may use not more
than 18 months for planning and
program design. (Section 4303(d)(1)(B)
of the ESEA). Applicants may propose
to support only one charter school per
grant application.
We reference additional regulations
outlining funding restrictions in the
Applicable Regulations section of this
notice.
5. Recommended Page Limit: The
application narrative (Part III of the
application) is where you, the applicant,
address the selection criteria that
reviewers use to evaluate your
application. We recommend that you (1)
limit the narrative to no more than 50
pages, and (2) use the following
standards:
• A ‘‘page’’ is 8.5″ x 11″, on one side
only, with 1″ margins at the top, bottom,
and both sides.
• Double space (no more than three
lines per vertical inch) all text in the
application narrative, including titles,
headings, footnotes, quotations,
references, and captions, as well as all
text in charts, tables, figures, and
graphs.
• Use a font that is either 12 point or
larger or no smaller than 10 pitch
(characters per inch).
• Use one of the following fonts:
Times New Roman, Courier, Courier
New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not
apply to Part I, the cover sheet; Part II,
the budget section, including the
narrative budget justification; Part IV,
the assurances and certifications; or the
one-page abstract, the resumes, the
bibliography, or the letters of support.
However, the recommended page limit
does apply to all of the application
narrative.
6. Notice of Intent to Apply: The
Department will be able to develop a
more efficient process for reviewing
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
grant applications if it has a better
understanding of the number of entities
that intend to apply for funding under
this competition. Therefore, we strongly
encourage each potential applicant to
notify us of their intent to submit an
application for funding by sending an
email to charterschools@ed.gov with FY
2020 CSP Developer Intent to Apply in
the subject line, by June 1, 2020.
Applicants that do not send a notice of
intent to apply may still apply for
funding.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria. The selection
criteria for applicants submitting
applications under CFDA numbers
84.282B and 84.282E are listed in
paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section,
respectively. These selection criteria are
from the NFP and 34 CFR 75.210. The
maximum possible score for addressing
all of the criteria in each section is 100
points. The maximum possible score for
addressing each criterion is indicated in
parentheses following the criterion.
In evaluating an application for a
Developer Grant, the Secretary
considers the following criteria:
(a) Selection Criteria for Grants for the
Opening of New Charter Schools (CFDA
number 84.282B).
(1) Quality of the management plan
(up to 30 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the management plan for the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the
management plan for the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management
plan to achieve the objectives of the
proposed project on time and within
budget, including clearly defined
responsibilities, timelines, and
milestones for accomplishing project
tasks (up to 15 points). (34 CFR
75.210(g)(2)(i))
(ii) The extent to which the time
commitments of the project director and
principal investigator and other key
project personnel are appropriate and
adequate to meet the objectives of the
proposed project (up to 10 points). (34
CFR 75.210(g)(2)(iv))
(iii) How the applicant will ensure
that a diversity of perspectives are
brought to bear in the operation of the
proposed project, including those of
parents, teachers, the business
community, a variety of disciplinary
and professional fields, recipients or
beneficiaries of services, or others, as
appropriate (up to 5 points). (34 CFR
75.210(g)(2)(v))
(2) Quality of the continuation plan
(up to 10 points).
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
In determining the quality of the
continuation plan, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
eligible applicant is prepared to
continue to operate the charter school
that would receive grant funds in a
manner consistent with the eligible
applicant’s application once the grant
funds under this program are no longer
available. (NFP)
(3) Significance of contribution in
assisting educationally disadvantaged
students (up to 20 points).
In determining the significance of the
contribution the proposed project will
make in expanding educational
opportunity for educationally
disadvantaged students and enabling
those students to meet challenging State
academic standards, the Secretary
considers the quality of the plan to
ensure that the charter school the
applicant proposes to open, replicate, or
expand will recruit, enroll, and
effectively serve educationally
disadvantaged students, which include
children with disabilities and English
learners. (NFP)
(4) Quality of the project design (up to
25 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed
project demonstrates a rationale (as
defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 10
points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(xxix))
(ii) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable (up to 10
points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(iii) The extent to which the design
for implementing and evaluating the
proposed project will result in
information to guide possible
replication of project activities or
strategies, including information about
the effectiveness of the approach or
strategies employed by the project (up to
5 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(x))
(5) Quality of the project personnel
(up to 15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the personnel who will carry out the
proposed project.
(i) In determining the quality of
project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are
members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented
based on race, color, national origin,
gender, age, or disability (up to 5
points). (34 CFR 75.210(e)(2))
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
(ii) In addition, the Secretary
considers the qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel (up to 10 points). (34
CFR 75.210(e)(3)(ii))
(b) Selection Criteria for Replication
and Expansion Grants (CFDA number
84.282E).
(1) Quality of the eligible applicant
(up to 30 points).
In determining the quality of the
eligible applicant, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the academic
achievement results (including annual
student performance on statewide
assessments and annual student
attendance and retention rates and
where applicable and available, student
academic growth, high school
graduation rates, postsecondary
enrollment and persistence rates,
including in college or career training
programs, employment rates, earnings
and other academic outcomes) for
educationally disadvantaged students
served by the charter schools operated
or managed by the applicant have
exceeded the average academic
achievement results for such students
served by other public schools in the
State (up to 10 points). (NFP)
(ii) The extent to which one or more
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant have closed; have had a
charter revoked due to noncompliance
with statutory or regulatory
requirements; or have had their
affiliation with the applicant revoked or
terminated, including through voluntary
disaffiliation (up to 10 points). (NFP)
(iii) The extent to which one or more
charter schools operated or managed by
the applicant have had any significant
issues in the area of financial or
operational management or student
safety, or have otherwise experienced
significant problems with statutory or
regulatory compliance that could lead to
revocation of the school’s charter (up to
5 points). (NFP)
(iv) The extent to which the schools
operated or managed by the applicant
demonstrate strong results on
measurable outcomes in non-academic
areas such as, but not limited to, parent
satisfaction, school climate, student
mental health, civic engagement, and
crime prevention and reduction (up to
5 points). (NFP)
(2) Quality of the continuation plan
(up to 10 points).
In determining the quality of the
continuation plan, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the
eligible applicant is prepared to
continue to operate the charter school
that would receive grant funds in a
manner consistent with the eligible
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31173
applicant’s application once the grant
funds under this program are no longer
available. (NFP)
(3) Significance of contribution in
assisting educationally disadvantaged
students (up to 20 points).
In determining the significance of the
contribution the proposed project will
make in expanding educational
opportunity for educationally
disadvantaged students and enabling
those students to meet challenging State
academic standards, the Secretary
considers the quality of the plan to
ensure that the charter school the
applicant proposes to open, replicate, or
expand will recruit, enroll, and
effectively serve educationally
disadvantaged students, which include
children with disabilities and English
learners. (NFP)
(4) Quality of the project design (up to
25 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the design of the proposed project. In
determining the quality of the design of
the proposed project, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed
project demonstrates a rationale (as
defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 10
points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(xxix))
(ii) The extent to which the goals,
objectives, and outcomes to be achieved
by the proposed project are clearly
specified and measurable (up to 10
points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(iii) The extent to which the design
for implementing and evaluating the
proposed project will result in
information to guide possible
replication of project activities or
strategies, including information about
the effectiveness of the approach or
strategies employed by the project (up to
5 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(x))
(5) Quality of the project personnel
and management plan (up to 15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of
the personnel who will carry out the
proposed project and the management
plan. In determining the quality of
project personnel and the management
plan, the Secretary considers the
following factors:
(i) The extent to which the applicant
encourages applications for employment
from persons who are members of
groups that have traditionally been
underrepresented based on race, color,
national origin, gender, age, or disability
(up to 2 points). (34 CFR 75.210(e)(2))
(ii) The qualifications, including
relevant training and experience, of key
project personnel (up to 10 points). (34
CFR 75.210(e)(3)(i))
(iii) The adequacy of procedures for
ensuring feedback and continuous
improvement in the operation of the
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
31174
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
proposed project (up to 3 points). (34
CFR 75.210(g)(2)(ii))
2. Review and Selection Process: We
remind potential applicants that in
reviewing applications in any
discretionary grant competition, the
Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR
75.217(d)(3), the past performance of the
applicant in carrying out a previous
award, such as the applicant’s use of
funds, achievement of project
objectives, and compliance with grant
conditions. The Secretary may also
consider whether the applicant failed to
submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable
quality.
In addition, in making a competitive
grant award, the Secretary requires
various assurances, including those
applicable to Federal civil rights laws
that prohibit discrimination in programs
or activities receiving Federal financial
assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific
Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under
this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by
applicants. Under 2 CFR 3474.10, the
Secretary may impose specific
conditions and, in appropriate
circumstances, high-risk conditions on a
grant if the applicant or grantee is not
financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a
financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2
CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant;
or is otherwise not responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System:
If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that
over the course of the project period
may exceed the simplified acquisition
threshold (currently $250,000), under 2
CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a
judgment about your integrity, business
ethics, and record of performance under
Federal awards—that is, the risk posed
by you as an applicant—before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider
any information about you that is in the
integrity and performance system
(currently referred to as the Federal
Awardee Performance and Integrity
Information System (FAPIIS)),
accessible through SAM. You may
review and comment on any
information about yourself that a
Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of
your currently active grants, cooperative
agreements, and procurement contracts
from the Federal Government exceeds
$10,000,000, the reporting requirements
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
in 2 CFR part 200, Appendix XII,
require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually.
Please review the requirements in 2 CFR
part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant
plus all the other Federal funds you
receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN); or we may send you an email
containing a link to access an electronic
version of your GAN. We may notify
you informally, also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements:
Unless an exception applies, if you are
awarded a grant under this competition,
you will be required to openly license
to the public grant deliverables created
in whole, or in part, with Department
grant funds. When the deliverable
consists of modifications to pre-existing
works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately
identified and only to the extent that
open licensing is permitted under the
terms of any licenses or other legal
restrictions on the use of pre-existing
works. Additionally, a grantee or
subgrantee that is awarded competitive
grant funds must have a plan to
disseminate these public grant
deliverables. This dissemination plan
can be developed and submitted after
your application has been reviewed and
selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing
requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a
grant under this competition, you must
ensure that you have in place the
necessary processes and systems to
comply with the reporting requirements
in 2 CFR part 170 should you receive
funding under the competition. This
does not apply if you have an exception
under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(b) At the end of your project period,
you must submit a final performance
report, including financial information,
as directed by the Secretary. If you
receive a multiyear award, you must
submit an annual performance report
that provides the most current
performance and financial expenditure
information as directed by the Secretary
under 34 CFR 75.118. The Secretary
may also require more frequent
performance reports under 34 CFR
75.720(c). For specific requirements on
reporting, please go to www.ed.gov/
fund/grant/apply/appforms/
appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the
Secretary may provide a grantee with
additional funding for data collection
analysis and reporting. In this case the
Secretary establishes a data collection
period.
5. Performance Measures: (a) The
Secretary has two performance
indicators to measure progress toward
achieving the purposes of the program,
which are discussed elsewhere in this
notice. The performance indicators are:
(1) The number of charter schools in
operation around the Nation and (2) the
percentage of fourth- and eighth-grade
charter school students who are
achieving at or above the proficient
level on State assessments in
mathematics and reading/language arts.
Additionally, the Secretary has
established the following measure to
examine the efficiency of the CSP: The
Federal cost per student in
implementing a successful school
(defined as a school in operation for
three or more consecutive years).
(b) Project-Specific Performance
Measures. Applicants must propose
project-specific performance measures
and performance targets consistent with
the objectives of the proposed project.
Applications must provide the
following information as directed under
34 CFR 75.110(b) and (c):
(1) Performance measures. How each
proposed performance measure would
accurately measure the performance of
the project and how the proposed
performance measure would be
consistent with the performance
measures established for the program
funding the competition.
(2) Baseline data. (i) Why each
proposed baseline is valid; or (ii) if the
applicant has determined that there are
no established baseline data for a
particular performance measure, an
explanation of why there is no
established baseline and of how and
when, during the project period, the
applicant would establish a valid
baseline for the performance measure.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 100 / Friday, May 22, 2020 / Notices
(3) Performance targets. Why each
proposed performance target is
ambitious yet achievable compared to
the baseline for the performance
measure and when, during the project
period, the applicant would meet the
performance target(s).
(4) Data collection and reporting. (i)
The data collection and reporting
methods the applicant would use and
why those methods are likely to yield
reliable, valid, and meaningful
performance data; and (ii) the
applicant’s capacity to collect and
report reliable, valid, and meaningful
performance data, as evidenced by highquality data collection, analysis, and
reporting in other projects or research.
All grantees must submit an annual
performance report with information
that is responsive to these performance
measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a
continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among
other things: Whether a grantee has
made substantial progress in achieving
the goals and objectives of the project;
whether the grantee has expended funds
in a manner that is consistent with its
approved application and budget; and,
if the Secretary has established
performance measurement
requirements, the performance targets
in the grantee’s approved application.
In making a continuation award, the
Secretary also considers whether the
grantee is operating in compliance with
the assurances in its approved
application, including those applicable
to Federal civil rights laws that prohibit
discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance
from the Department (34 CFR 100.4,
104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
7. Project Director’s Meeting:
Applicants approved for funding under
this competition must attend a two-day
meeting for project directors at a
location to be determined in the
continental United States during each
year of the project. Applicants may
include the cost of attending this
meeting as an administrative cost in
their proposed budgets.
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the program contact person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:07 May 21, 2020
Jkt 250001
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations at
www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can
view this document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
your search to documents published by
the Department.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and
Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020–11047 Filed 5–21–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
Combined Notice of Filings #1
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric corporate
filings:
Docket Numbers: EC20–67–000.
Applicants: Broadview Energy JN,
LLC, Broadview Energy KW, LLC.
Description: Application for
Authorization Under Section 203 of the
Federal Power Act, et al. of Broadview
Energy JN, LLC, et al.
Filed Date: 5/15/20.
Accession Number: 20200515–5304.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/20.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following exempt
wholesale generator filings:
Docket Numbers: EG20–166–000.
Applicants: Tehachapi Plains Wind,
LLC.
Description: Notice of SelfCertification of Exempt Wholesale
Generator Status of Tehachapi Plains
Wind, LLC.
Filed Date: 5/15/20.
Accession Number: 20200515–5210.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/20.
Take notice that the Commission
received the following electric rate
filings:
Docket Numbers: ER20–1396–001.
Applicants: VETCO.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
Amendment to Baseline Filing to be
effective 3/26/2020.
Filed Date: 5/18/20.
Accession Number: 20200518–5113.
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
31175
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 5/26/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1803–001.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
2020–05–18_SA 3493 METC-River Fork
Solar Substitute GIA (J806) to be
effective 4/27/2020.
Filed Date: 5/18/20.
Accession Number: 20200518–5090.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/8/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1811–001.
Applicants: Midcontinent
Independent System Operator, Inc.
Description: Tariff Amendment:
2020–05–18_SA 3495 ITC-White Tail
Solar Substitute GIA (J799) to be
effective 5/5/2020.
Filed Date: 5/18/20.
Accession Number: 20200518–5094.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/8/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1836–000.
Applicants: Dominion Energy South
Carolina, Inc.
Description: Compliance filing: Order
864 Compliance Filing to be effective 1/
27/2020.
Filed Date: 5/15/20.
Accession Number: 20200515–5204.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1837–000.
Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas,
LLC, Duke Energy Florida, LLC, Duke
Energy Progress, LLC.
Description: Compliance filing: Joint
OATT Order 864 Compliance Filing to
be effective 1/27/2020.
Filed Date: 5/15/20.
Accession Number: 20200515–5214.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1838–000.
Applicants: Duke Energy Carolinas,
LLC, Duke Energy Florida, LLC.
Description: Petition for Limited
Waiver, et al. of the Duke Southeast
Companies.
Filed Date: 5/15/20.
Accession Number: 20200515–5307.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/5/20
Docket Numbers: ER20–1839–000.
Applicants: VETCO.
Description: Compliance filing:
Compliance Filing for Order No. 864 to
be effective 3/26/2020.
Filed Date: 5/18/20.
Accession Number: 20200518–5068.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/8/20.
Docket Numbers: ER20–1840–000.
Applicants: Southern California
Edison Company.
Description: § 205(d) Rate Filing:
Second Amendment DSA P&G Oxnard
Cogen2 SA No. 1086 to be effective 4/
1/2020.
Filed Date: 5/18/20.
Accession Number: 20200518–5073.
Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/8/20.
E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM
22MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 100 (Friday, May 22, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 31165-31175]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-11047]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Applications for New Awards; Expanding Opportunity Through
Quality Charter Schools Program (CSP)---Grants to Charter School
Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools and for the
Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (Developer
Grants)
AGENCY: Office of Elementary and Secondary Education, Department of
Education.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Education (Department) is issuing a notice
inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY) 2020 for
CSP--Developer Grants, Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA)
numbers 84.282B (for the opening of new charter schools) and 84.282E
(for the replication and expansion of high-quality charter schools).
This notice relates to the
[[Page 31166]]
approved information collection under OMB control number 1894-0006.
DATES:
Applications Available: May 19, 2020.
Deadline for Notice of Intent to Apply: Applicants are strongly
encouraged, but not required, to submit a notice of intent to apply by
June 1, 2020.
Pre-Application Webinar Information: The Department will hold a
pre-application meeting via webinar for prospective applicants on
Tuesday, May 26, 2020 from 2:00-4:00 p.m., Eastern Time.
Deadline for Transmittal of Applications: June 19, 2020.
Deadline for Intergovernmental Review: August 18, 2020.
ADDRESSES: For the addresses for obtaining and submitting an
application, please refer to our Common Instructions for Applicants to
Department of Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the
Federal Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf.
Grants.gov has relaxed the requirement for applicants to have an active
registration in the System for Award Management (SAM) in order to apply
for funding during the COVID-19 pandemic. An applicant that does not
have an active SAM registration can still register with Grants.gov, but
must contact the Grants.gov Support Desk, toll-free, at 1-800-518-4726,
in order to take advantage of this flexibility.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Leslie Hankerson, U.S. Department of
Education, 400 Maryland Avenue SW, room 3E117, Washington, DC 20202-
5970. Telephone: (202) 205-8524. Email: [email protected].
If you use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a text
telephone (TTY), call the Federal Relay Service (FRS), toll free, at 1-
800-877-8339.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Full Text of Announcement
I. Funding Opportunity Description
Purpose of Program: The major purposes of the CSP are to expand
opportunities for all students, particularly traditionally underserved
students, to attend charter schools \1\ and meet challenging State
academic standards; provide financial assistance for the planning,
program design, and initial implementation of public charter schools;
increase the number of high-quality charter schools available to
students across the United States; evaluate the impact of charter
schools on student achievement, families, and communities; share best
practices between charter schools and other public schools; encourage
States to provide facilities support to charter schools; and support
efforts to strengthen the charter authorizing process.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Italicized terms are defined in the Definitions section of
this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSP--Developer Grants are intended to provide financial assistance
for the planning, program design, and initial implementation of charter
schools through awarding CSP Grants to Charter School Developers for
the Opening of New Charter Schools and for the Replication and
Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (also referred to as
Developer Grants). The Department provides funds to charter school
developers on a competitive basis to enable them to open new charter
schools (CFDA number 84.282B) or replicate or expand high-quality
charter schools (CFDA number 84.282E). Eligibility for a grant under
this competition is limited to charter school developers in States that
do not currently have a CSP State Entity grant (CFDA number 84.282A)
under the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (ESEA), as
amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA).\2\ Eligibility in a
State with a CSP State Educational Agency (SEA) grant under the ESEA,
as amended by the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) (CFDA number
84.282A), is limited to charter school developers applying for grants
for the replication and expansion of high-quality charter schools (CFDA
number 84.282E) and only if the Department has not approved an
amendment to the SEA's approved grant application authorizing the SEA
to make subgrants for replication and expansion. Charter schools that
receive financial assistance through Developer Grants provide programs
of elementary or secondary education, or both, and may also serve
students in early childhood education programs or postsecondary
students.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ All references to the ESEA in this notice are to the ESEA,
as amended by the ESSA, unless otherwise noted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Background: This notice invites applications from eligible
applicants for two types of grants: (1) Grants to Charter School
Developers for the Opening of New Charter Schools (CFDA number 84.282B)
and (2) Grants to Charter School Developers for the Replication and
Expansion of High-Quality Charter Schools (CFDA number 84.282E). Under
this competition, each CFDA number constitutes its own funding
category. The Secretary intends to award grants under each CFDA number
for applications that are sufficiently high quality.
All charter schools receiving CSP funds must meet the definition of
a ``charter school'' in section 4310(2) of the ESEA, including the
requirements that a charter school comply with non-discrimination and
privacy laws, including the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of
1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, section 444 of the General Education
Provisions Act (GEPA), part B of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act (IDEA) (i.e., rights afforded to children with
disabilities and their parents), and applicable State laws.
For more information on eligibility, please see section III.1 of
this notice.
Priorities: This notice includes five competitive preference
priorities. Competitive Preference Priorities 1, 2, 3, and 4 are from
the notice of final priorities, requirements, definitions, and
selection criteria (NFP) for this program published in the Federal
Register on July 3, 2019 (84 FR 31726). Competitive Preference Priority
5 is from the notice of final priorities published in the Federal
Register on March 9, 2020 (85 FR 13640) (Administrative Priorities).
Note: In order to receive points under these competitive
preference priorities, the applicant must identify the priority or
priorities that it is addressing and provide documentation that
supports the identified competitive preference priority or
priorities.
Competitive Preference Priorities: For FY 2020 and any subsequent
year in which we make awards from the list of unfunded applications
from this competition, these priorities are competitive preference
priorities.
For CFDA number 84.282B, under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will
award an additional 7 points to an application that meets Competitive
Preference Priority 1; up to an additional 7 points, depending on how
well the application addresses Competitive Preference Priority 2; up to
an additional 5 points to an application, depending on how well the
application addresses Competitive Preference Priority 3; and an
additional 3 points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 5. The maximum number of competitive preference priority
points an application for CFDA number 84.282B can receive under these
priorities is 22.
For CFDA number 84.282E, under 34 CFR 75.105(c)(2)(i), we will
award an
[[Page 31167]]
additional 7 points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 1; up to an additional 7 points, depending on how well the
application addresses Competitive Preference Priority 2; up to an
additional 5 points to an application, depending on how well the
application addresses Competitive Preference Priority 3; and an
additional 3 points to an application that meets Competitive Preference
Priority 4. The maximum number of competitive preference priority
points an application for CFDA number 84.282E can receive under these
priorities is 22.
These priorities are:
Competitive Preference Priority 1--Rural Community. (0 or 7 points
under CFDA numbers 84.282B and 84.282E).
Under this priority, applicants must propose to open a new charter
school or to replicate or expand a high-quality charter school in a
rural community.
Competitive Preference Priority 2--Spurring Investment in
Opportunity Zones.
Under this priority, an applicant must address one or both of the
following priority areas:
(a) Proposes to open a new charter school or to replicate or expand
a high-quality charter school in a qualified opportunity zone as
designated by the Secretary of the Treasury under section 1400Z-1 of
the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act
(Pub. L. 115-97). (0 or 3 points under CFDA numbers 84.282B and
84.282E)
In addressing paragraph (a) of this priority, an applicant must
provide the census tract number of the qualified opportunity zone in
which it proposes to open a new charter school or replicate or expand a
high-quality charter school. A list of qualified opportunity zones,
with census tract numbers, is available at www.cdfifund.gov/Pages/Opportunity-Zones.aspx.
Note: Applicants may also determine whether a particular area is
part of a qualified opportunity zone using the National Center of
Education Statistics' map located at https://nces.ed.gov/programs/maped/LocaleLookup/.
(b) Provide evidence in its application that it has received or
will receive an investment from a qualified opportunity fund under
section 1400Z-2 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax
Cuts and Jobs Act, for one or more of the following, as needed to open
or to replicate or expand the school:
(1) The acquisition (by purchase, lease, donation, or otherwise) of
an interest (including an interest held by a third party for the
benefit of the school) in improved or unimproved real property;
(2) The construction of new facilities, or the renovation, repair,
or alteration of existing facilities;
(3) The predevelopment costs required to assess sites for purposes
of subparagraph (1) or (2); and
(4) The acquisition of other tangible property.
In addressing paragraph (b) of this priority, an applicant must
identify the qualified opportunity fund from which it has received or
will receive financial assistance. (0 or 4 points under CFDA numbers
84.282B and 84.282E)
Competitive Preference Priority 3--Opening a New Charter School or
Replicating or Expanding a High-quality Charter School to Serve Native
American Students. (Up to 5 points under CFDA numbers 84.282B and
84.282E)
Under this priority, applicants must--
(a) Propose to open a new charter school, or replicate or expand a
high-quality charter school, that--
(1) Utilizes targeted outreach and recruitment in order to serve a
high proportion of Native American students, consistent with
nondiscrimination requirements contained in the U.S. Constitution and
Federal civil rights laws;
(2) Has a mission and focus that will address the unique
educational needs of Native American students, such as through the use
of instructional programs and teaching methods that reflect and
preserve Native American language, culture, and history; and
(3) Has or will have a governing board with a substantial
percentage of members who are members of Indian Tribes or Native
American organizations located within the area to be served by the new,
replicated, or expanded charter school;
(b) Submit a letter of support from at least one Indian Tribe or
Native American organization located within the area to be served by
the new, replicated, or expanded charter school; and
(c) Meaningfully collaborate with the Indian Tribe(s) or Native
American organization(s) from which the applicant has received a letter
of support in a timely, active, and ongoing manner with respect to the
development and implementation of the educational program at the
charter school.
Competitive Preference Priority 4--Single School Operators. (0 or 3
points under CFDA number 84.282E)
Under this priority, applicants must provide evidence that the
applicant currently operates one, and only one, charter school.
Competitive Preference Priority 5--Applications from New Potential
Grantees. (0 or 3 points under CFDA number 84.282B)
Under this priority, an applicant must demonstrate that it has
never received a grant, including through membership in a group
application submitted in accordance with 34 CFR 75.127-75.129, under
the program from which it seeks funds.
Definitions:
The following definitions are from sections 4310 and 8101 of the
ESEA, section 602 of the IDEA, 34 CFR 77.1, and the NFP.
Ambitious means promoting continued, meaningful improvement for
program participants or for other individuals or entities affected by
the grant or representing a significant advancement in the field of
education research, practices, or methodologies. When used to describe
a performance target, whether a performance target is ambitious depends
upon the context of the relevant performance measure and the baseline
for that measure. (34 CFR 77.1)
Authorized public chartering agency means a State educational
agency, local educational agency, or other public entity that has the
authority pursuant to State law and approved by the Secretary to
authorize or approve a charter school. (Section 4310(1) of the ESEA)
Baseline means the starting point from which performance is
measured and targets are set. (34 CFR 77.1)
Charter management organization means a nonprofit organization that
operates or manages a network of charter schools linked by centralized
support, operations, and oversight. (Section 4310(3) of the ESEA)
Charter school means a public school that--
(a) In accordance with a specific State statute authorizing the
granting of charters to schools, is exempt from significant State or
local rules that inhibit the flexible operation and management of
public schools, but not from any rules relating to the other
requirements of this definition;
(b) Is created by a developer as a public school, or is adapted by
a developer from an existing public school, and is operated under
public supervision and direction;
(c) Operates in pursuit of a specific set of educational objectives
determined by the school's developer and agreed to by the authorized
public chartering agency;
(d) Provides a program of elementary or secondary education, or
both;
[[Page 31168]]
(e) Is nonsectarian in its programs, admissions policies,
employment practices, and all other operations, and is not affiliated
with a sectarian school or religious institution;
(f) Does not charge tuition;
(g) Complies with the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, title VI of
the Civil Rights Act of 1964, title IX of the Education Amendments of
1972, section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.), section 444 of GEPA
(20 U.S.C. 1232g) (commonly referred to as the ``Family Educational
Rights and Privacy Act of 1974''), and part B of the IDEA;
(h) Is a school to which parents choose to send their children, and
that--
(1) Admits students on the basis of a lottery, consistent with
section 4303(c)(3)(A) of the ESEA, if more students apply for admission
than can be accommodated; or
(2) In the case of a school that has an affiliated charter school
(such as a school that is part of the same network of schools),
automatically enrolls students who are enrolled in the immediate prior
grade level of the affiliated charter school and, for any additional
student openings or student openings created through regular attrition
in student enrollment in the affiliated charter school and the
enrolling school, admits students on the basis of a lottery as
described in clause (1);
(i) Agrees to comply with the same Federal and State audit
requirements as do other elementary schools and secondary schools in
the State, unless such State audit requirements are waived by the
State;
(j) Meets all applicable Federal, State, and local health and
safety requirements;
(k) Operates in accordance with State law;
(l) Has a written performance contract with the authorized public
chartering agency in the State that includes a description of how
student performance will be measured in charter schools pursuant to
State assessments that are required of other schools and pursuant to
any other assessments mutually agreeable to the authorized public
chartering agency and the charter school; and
(m) May serve students in early childhood education programs or
postsecondary students. (Section 4310(2) of the ESEA)
Child with a disability means--
(a) In general--
The term ``child with a disability'' means a child--
(i) With intellectual disabilities, hearing impairments (including
deafness), speech or language impairments, visual impairments
(including blindness), serious emotional disturbance (referred to in
this title as ``emotional disturbance''), orthopedic impairments,
autism, traumatic brain injury, other health impairments, or specific
learning disabilities; and
(ii) Who, by reason thereof, needs special education and related
services.
(b) Child aged 3 through 9--The term ``child with a disability''
for a child aged 3 through 9 (or any subset of that age range,
including ages 3 through 5), may, at the discretion of the State and
the local educational agency, include a child--
(i) Experiencing developmental delays, as defined by the State and
as measured by appropriate diagnostic instruments and procedures, in 1
or more of the following areas: physical development; cognitive
development; communication development; social or emotional
development; or adaptive development; and
(ii) Who, by reason thereof, needs special education and related
services. (Section 8101(4) of the ESEA and section 602 of the IDEA)
Demonstrates a rationale means a key project component included in
the project's logic model is informed by research or evaluation
findings that suggest the project component is likely to improve
relevant outcomes. (34 CFR 77.1)
Developer means an individual or group of individuals (including a
public or private nonprofit organization), which may include teachers,
administrators and other school staff, parents, or other members of the
local community in which a charter school project will be carried out.
(Section 4310(5) of the ESEA)
Educationally disadvantaged student means a student in one or more
of the categories described in section 1115(c)(2) of the ESEA, which
include children who are economically disadvantaged, children with
disabilities, migrant students, English learners, neglected or
delinquent students, homeless students, and students who are in foster
care. (NFP)
English learner, when used with respect to an individual, means an
individual--
(a) Who is aged 3 through 21;
(b) Who is enrolled or preparing to enroll in an elementary school
or secondary school;
(c)(1) Who was not born in the United States or whose native
language is a language other than English;
(2)(i) Who is a Native American or Alaska Native, or a native
resident of the outlying areas; and
(ii) Who comes from an environment where a language other than
English has had a significant impact on the individual's level of
English language proficiency; or
(3) Who is migratory, whose native language is a language other
than English, and who comes from an environment where a language other
than English is dominant; and
(d) Whose difficulties in speaking, reading, writing, or
understanding the English language may be sufficient to deny the
individual--
(1) The ability to meet the challenging State academic standards;
(2) The ability to successfully achieve in classrooms where the
language of instruction is English; or
(3) The opportunity to participate fully in society. (Section
8101(20) of the ESEA)
Expand, when used with respect to a high-quality charter school,
means to significantly increase enrollment or add one or more grades to
the high-quality charter school. (Section 4310(7) of the ESEA)
High proportion, when used to refer to Native American students,
means a fact-specific, case-by-case determination based upon the unique
circumstances of a particular charter school or proposed charter
school. The Secretary considers ``high proportion'' to include a
majority of Native American students. In addition, the Secretary may
determine that less than a majority of Native American students
constitutes a ``high proportion'' based on the unique circumstances of
a particular charter school or proposed charter school, as described in
the application for funds. (NFP)
High-quality charter school means a charter school that--
(a) Shows evidence of strong academic results, which may include
strong student academic growth, as determined by a State;
(b) Has no significant issues in the areas of student safety,
financial and operational management, or statutory or regulatory
compliance;
(c) Has demonstrated success in significantly increasing student
academic achievement, including graduation rates where applicable, for
all students served by the charter school; and
(d) Has demonstrated success in increasing student academic
achievement, including graduation rates where applicable, for each of
the subgroups of students, as defined in section 1111(c)(2) of the
ESEA, except
[[Page 31169]]
that such demonstration is not required in a case in which the number
of students in a group is insufficient to yield statistically reliable
information or the results would reveal personally identifiable
information about an individual student. (Section 4310(8) of the ESEA)
Indian Tribe means a federally recognized or a State-recognized
Tribe. (NFP)
Institution of higher education means an educational institution in
any State that--
(a) Admits as regular students only persons having a certificate of
graduation from a school providing secondary education, or the
recognized equivalent of such a certificate, or persons who meet the
requirements of section 484(d) of the HEA;
(b) Is legally authorized within such State to provide a program of
education beyond secondary education;
(c) Provides an educational program for which the institution
awards a bachelor's degree or provides not less than a 2-year program
that is acceptable for full credit toward such a degree, or awards a
degree that is acceptable for admission to a graduate or professional
degree program, subject to review and approval by the Secretary;
(d) Is a public or other nonprofit institution; and
(e) Is accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency or
association, or if not so accredited, is an institution that has been
granted pre-accreditation status by such an agency or association that
has been recognized by the Secretary for the granting of pre-
accreditation status, and the Secretary has determined that there is
satisfactory assurance that the institution will meet the accreditation
standards of such an agency or association within a reasonable time.
(NFP)
Logic model (also referred to as theory of action) means a
framework that identifies key project components of the proposed
project (i.e., the active ``ingredients'' that are hypothesized to be
critical to achieving the relevant outcomes) and describes the
theoretical and operational relationships among the key project
components and relevant outcomes. (34 CFR 77.1)
Native American means an Indian (including an Alaska Native), as
defined in section 6132(b)(2) of the ESEA, Native Hawaiian, or Native
American Pacific Islander. (NFP)
Native American language means the historical, traditional
languages spoken by Native Americans. (NFP)
Native American organization means an organization that--
(a) Is legally established--
(1) By Tribal or inter-Tribal charter or in accordance with State
or Tribal law; and
(2) With appropriate constitution, by-laws, or articles of
incorporation;
(b) Includes in its purposes the promotion of the education of
Native Americans;
(c) Is controlled by a governing board, the majority of which is
Native American;
(d) If located on an Indian reservation, operates with the sanction
or by charter of the governing body of that reservation;
(e) Is neither an organization or subdivision of, nor under the
direct control of, any institution of higher education; and
(f) Is not an agency of State or local government. (NFP)
Performance measure means any quantitative indicator, statistic, or
metric used to gauge program or project performance. (34 CFR 77.1)
Performance target means a level of performance that an applicant
would seek to meet during the course of a project or as a result of a
project. (34 CFR 77.1)
Project component means an activity, strategy, intervention,
process, product, practice, or policy included in a project. Evidence
may pertain to an individual project component (e.g., training teachers
or instructional practices for English learners and follow-on coaching
for these teachers). (34 CFR 77.1)
Relevant outcome means the student outcome(s) or other outcome(s)
the key project component is designed to improve, consistent with the
specific goals of the program. (34 CFR 77.1)
Replicate, when used with respect to a high-quality charter school,
means to open a new charter school, or a new campus of a high-quality
charter school, based on the educational model of an existing high-
quality charter school, under an existing charter or an additional
charter, if permitted or required by State law. (Section 4310(9) of the
ESEA)
Rural community is a community served by one or more local
educational agencies (LEAs) (a) with a locale code of 32, 33, 41, 42,
or 43; or (b) that include a majority of schools with a locale code of
32, 33, 41, 42, or 43. Applicants are encouraged to retrieve locale
codes from the National Center for Education Statistics School District
search tool (https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/districtsearch/), where LEAs can
be looked up individually to retrieve locale codes, and Public School
search tool (https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/schoolsearch/), where individual
schools can be looked up to retrieve locale codes. (NFP)
Application Requirements:
Applications for CSP Developer Grant funds must address the
following application requirements. These requirements are from the NFP
and section 4303(f) \3\ of the ESEA. The source of each requirement is
provided in parentheses following each requirement. Except as otherwise
provided, an applicant may choose to respond to each requirement
separately or in the context of the applicant's responses to the
selection criteria in section V.1 of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Under section 4305(c) of the ESEA, Developer Grants must
have the same terms and conditions as grants awarded to State
entities under section 4303. For clarity, with respect to
requirements that derive from section 4303 the Department has, as
applicable, omitted the term ``State entity'' or replaced it with
``eligible applicant.'' In addition, the Department has replaced
``State entity's program'' and ``subgrant,'' respectively, with
``program'' and ``grant.''
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Grants to Charter School Developers for the Opening of New Charter
Schools (CFDA number 84.282B) and for the Replication and Expansion of
High-Quality Charter Schools (CFDA number 84.282E).
Applicants for grants under CFDA number 84.282B or 84.282E must
address the following application requirements. An applicant must
respond to the requirements in paragraph (a) in a stand-alone section
of the application or in an appendix.
(a) Describe the eligible applicant's objectives in running a
quality charter school program and how the program will be carried out,
including--
(1) How the eligible applicant will ensure that charter schools
receiving funds under this program meet the educational needs of their
students, including children with disabilities and English learners
(Section 4303(f)(1)(A)(x) of the ESEA);
(2) The roles and responsibilities of eligible applicants, partner
organizations, and charter management organizations, including the
administrative and contractual roles and responsibilities of such
partners (Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(I) of the ESEA);
(3) The quality controls agreed to between the eligible applicant
and the authorized public chartering agency involved, such as a
contract or performance agreement, how a school's performance in the
State's accountability system and impact on student achievement (which
may include student academic growth) will be one of the most important
factors for renewal or revocation of the school's charter, and how the
authorized public chartering agency involved will reserve the right to
revoke or not renew a school's charter based on financial,
[[Page 31170]]
structural, or operational factors involving the management of the
school (Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(II) of the ESEA);
(4) How the autonomy and flexibility granted to a charter school is
consistent with the definition of a charter school in section 4310 of
the ESEA (Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(III) of the ESEA);
(5) How the eligible applicant will solicit and consider input from
parents and other members of the community on the implementation and
operation of each charter school that will receive funds under the
grant (Section 4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(IV) of the ESEA);
(6) The eligible applicant's planned activities and expenditures of
grant funds to support the activities described in section 4303(b)(1)
of the ESEA, and how the eligible applicant will maintain financial
sustainability after the end of the grant period (Section
4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(V) of the ESEA);
(7) How the eligible applicant will support the use of effective
parent, family, and community engagement strategies to operate each
charter school that will receive funds under the grant (Section
4303(f)(1)(C)(i)(VI) of the ESEA); and
(8) How the eligible applicant will ensure that each charter school
receiving funds under this program has considered and planned for the
transportation needs of the school's students (Section 4303(f)(1)(E) of
the ESEA).
(b) Describe the educational program that the applicant will
implement in the charter school receiving funding under this program,
including--
(1) Information on how the program will enable all students to meet
the challenging State academic standards;
(2) The grade levels or ages of students who will be served; and
(3) The instructional practices that will be used. (NFP)
(c) Describe how the applicant will ensure that the charter school
that will receive funds will recruit, enroll, and retain students,
including educationally disadvantaged students, which include children
with disabilities and English learners. (NFP)
(d) Describe the lottery and enrollment procedures that the
applicant will use for the charter school if more students apply for
admission than can be accommodated and, if the applicant proposes to
use a weighted lottery, how the weighted lottery complies with section
4303(c)(3)(A) of the ESEA. (NFP)
(e) Provide a complete logic model (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1) for
the grant project. The logic model must include the applicant's
objectives for implementing a new charter school or replicating or
expanding a high-quality charter school with funding under this
competition. (NFP)
(f) Provide a budget narrative, aligned with the activities, target
grant project outputs, and outcomes described in the logic model, that
outlines how grant funds will be expended to carry out planned
activities. (NFP)
(g) If the applicant proposes to open a new charter school (CFDA
number 84.282B) or proposes to replicate or expand a high-quality
charter school (CFDA number 84.282E) that provides a single-sex
educational program, demonstrate that the proposed single-sex
educational programs are in compliance with the title IX of the
Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. 1681, et seq.) (``Title IX'')
and its implementing regulations, including 34 CFR 106.34. (NFP)
(h) Provide the applicant's most recent available independently
audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. (NFP)
(i) Provide--
(1) A request and justification for waivers of any Federal
statutory or regulatory provisions that the eligible entity believes
are necessary for the successful operation of the charter school to be
opened or to be replicated or expanded; and
(2) A description of any State or local rules, generally applicable
to public schools, that will be waived or otherwise not apply to the
school that will receive funds. (NFP)
(j) Describe how each school that will receive funds meets the
definition of charter school under section 4310(2) of the ESEA. (NFP)
Grants for the Replication and Expansion of High-Quality Charter
Schools (CFDA number 84.282E).
In addition to the preceding application requirements, applicants
for grants under CFDA number 84.282E must--
(a) For each charter school currently operated or managed by the
applicant, provide--
(1) Information that demonstrates that the school is treated as a
separate school by its authorized public chartering agency and the
State, including for purposes of accountability and reporting under
title I, part A of the ESEA;
(2) Student assessment results for all students and for each
subgroup of students described in section 1111(c)(2) of the ESEA;
(3) Attendance and student retention rates for the most recently
completed school year and, if applicable, the most recent available
four-year adjusted cohort graduation rates and extended-year adjusted
cohort graduation rates; and
(4) Information on any significant compliance and management issues
encountered within the last three school years by the existing charter
school being operated or managed by the eligible entity, including in
the areas of student safety and finance. (NFP)
Assurances:
Applicants for CSP Developer Grants must provide the following
assurances. These assurances are from section 4303(f) of the ESEA. The
source of each assurance is provided in parentheses following each
assurance.
Applicants for funds under this program must provide assurances
that--
(a) Each charter school receiving funds through this program will
have a high degree of autonomy over budget and operations, including
autonomy over personnel decisions (Section 4303(f)(2)(A) of the ESEA);
(b) The eligible applicant will support charter schools in meeting
the educational needs of their students, as described in section
4303(f)(1)(A)(x) of the ESEA (Section 4303(f)(2)(B) of the ESEA); and
(c) The eligible applicant will ensure that each charter school
receiving funds under this program makes publicly available, consistent
with the dissemination requirements of the annual State report card
under section 1111(h) of the ESEA, including on the website of the
school, information to help parents make informed decisions about the
education options available to their children, including--
(i) Information on the educational program;
(ii) Student support services;
(iii) Parent contract requirements (as applicable), including any
financial obligations or fees;
(iv) Enrollment criteria (as applicable); and
(v) Annual performance and enrollment data for each of the
subgroups of students, as defined in section 1111(c)(2) of the ESEA,
except that such disaggregation of performance and enrollment data
shall not be required in a case in which the number of students in a
group is insufficient to yield statically reliable information or the
results would reveal personally identifiable information about an
individual student. (Section 4303(f)(2)(G) of the ESEA)
Program Authority: Title IV, part C of the ESEA, as amended.
Applicable Regulations: (a) The Education Department General
Administrative Regulations in 34 CFR parts 75, 76, 77, 79, 81, 82, 84,
86, 97, 98, and 99. (b) The Office of
[[Page 31171]]
Management and Budget Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide
Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement) in 2 CFR part 180, as adopted
and amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3485. (c)
The Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit
Requirements for Federal Awards in 2 CFR part 200, as adopted and
amended as regulations of the Department in 2 CFR part 3474. (d) The
NFP. (e) The Administrative Priorities.
Note: The regulations in 34 CFR part 79 apply to all applicants
except federally recognized Indian Tribes.
II. Award Information
Type of Award: Discretionary grants.
Estimated Available Funds: $7,500,000.
Contingent upon the availability of funds and the quality of
applications, we may make additional awards in subsequent years from
the list of unfunded applications from this competition.
Estimated Range of Awards: $150,000--$300,000 per year.
Estimated Average Size of Awards: $225,000 per year.
Maximum Award: See Reasonable and Necessary Costs in section III.4.
for information regarding the maximum amount of funds that may be
awarded per new school seat and per new school.
Estimated Number of Awards: 12-25.
Note: The Department is not bound by any estimates in this
notice. The estimated range and average size of awards are based on
a single 12-month budget period. We may use available funds to
support multiple 12-month budget periods for one or more grantees.
Project Period: Up to 60 months.
III. Eligibility Information
1. Eligible Applicants:
Eligible applicants are developers that have--
(a) Applied to an authorized public chartering authority to operate
a charter school; and
(b) Provided adequate and timely notice to that authority. (Section
4310(6) of the ESEA).
Additionally, the charter school must be located in a State with a
State statute specifically authorizing the establishment of charter
schools (as defined in section 4310(2) of the ESEA) and in which a
State entity currently does not have a CSP State Entity grant (CFDA
number 84.282A) under section 4303 of the ESEA.\4\ (Section 4305(a)(2)
of the ESEA) Eligibility in a State with a CSP SEA grant (CFDA 84.282A)
under the ESEA, as amended by NCLB, is limited to grants for
replication and expansion \5\ (CFDA 84.282E) and only if the Department
has not approved an amendment to the SEA's approved grant application
authorizing the SEA to make subgrants for replication and expansion.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ States in which a State entity currently has an approved CSP
State Entity grant application under section 4303 of the ESEA that
is actively running subgrant competitions are Alabama, Arizona,
Arkansas, Colorado, Delaware, Idaho, Indiana, Maryland, Michigan,
Minnesota, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Mexico, New York, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin.
We will not consider applications from applicants in these States
under either CFDA 84.282B or 84.282E.
\5\ States in which the SEA currently has an approved CSP SEA
grant application under the ESEA, as amended by NCLB (i.e., a grant
award made in fiscal year 2016 or earlier), are California, District
of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nevada,
Ohio, South Carolina, and Tennessee. We will not consider
applications from applicants in these States for grants for the
opening of new charter schools submitted under CFDA number 84.282B.
\6\ States in which the SEA currently has an approved CSP SEA
grant application under the ESEA, as amended by NCLB (i.e., a grant
award made in fiscal year 2016 or earlier), and have approved
amendment requests that authorize the SEA to make subgrants for
replication and expansion, are California, District of Columbia,
Massachusetts, Nevada, and Ohio. We will not consider applications
from applicants in these States for grants for the replication or
expansion of high-quality charter schools under CFDA 84.282E either.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As a general matter, the Secretary considers charter schools that
have been in operation for more than five years to be past the initial
implementation phase and, therefore, ineligible to receive CSP funds
under CFDA number 84.282B to support the opening of a new charter
school or under CFDA number 84.282E for the replication of a high-
quality charter school; however, such schools may receive CSP funds
under CFDA number 84.282E for the expansion of a high-quality charter
school.
Note: If an applicant has applied to an authorized public
chartering agency to operate a new school and has not yet been
approved, it must include in its application, a dated copy of its
application to the authorized public chartering agency, and
information addressing the plan and timeline to receive notification
from the authorizer on the final decision. Additionally, an
applicant should delineate any costs in its proposed budget that are
projected to be incurred prior to the date the applicant's charter
school application is approved by the authorized public chartering
agency.
2. Cost Sharing or Matching: This program does not require cost
sharing or matching.
3. Subgrantees: A grantee under this competition may not award
subgrants to entities to directly carry out project activities
described in its application.
4. Reasonable and Necessary Costs: The Secretary may elect to
impose maximum limits on the amount of grant funds that may be awarded
for a new charter school, or replicated, or expanded, high-quality
charter school.
For this competition, the maximum limit of grant funds that may be
awarded for a new, replicated, or expanded charter school is
$1,500,000.
In accordance with 2 CFR 200.404, applicants must ensure that all
costs included in the proposed budget are reasonable and necessary in
light of the goals and objectives of the proposed project. Any costs
determined by the Secretary to be unreasonable or unnecessary will be
removed from the final approved budget.
A charter school that previously has received CSP funds for
replication or expansion or for planning or initial implementation of a
charter school under CFDA number 84.282A or 84.282M (under the ESEA)
may not use funds under this grant for the same purpose. However, such
charter school may be eligible to receive funds under this competition
to expand the charter school beyond the existing grade levels or
student count and beyond the grade levels or projected student count
provided in the previous CSP award. Likewise, a charter school that
receives funds under this competition is ineligible to receive funds
for the same purpose under section 4303(b)(1) or 4305(b) of the ESEA,
including opening and preparing for the operation of a new charter
school, opening and preparing for the operation of a replicated high-
quality charter school, or expanding a high-quality charter school
(i.e., CFDA number 84.282A or 84.282M).
IV. Application and Submission Information
1. Application Submission Instructions: Applicants are required to
follow the Common Instructions for Applicants to Department of
Education Discretionary Grant Programs, published in the Federal
Register on February 13, 2019 (84 FR 3768) and available at
www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-02-13/pdf/2019-02206.pdf, which
contain requirements and information on how to submit an application.
Grants.gov has relaxed the requirement for applicants to have an active
registration in SAM in order to apply for funding during the COVID-19
pandemic. An applicant that does not have an active SAM registration
can still register with Grants.gov, but must contact the Grants.gov
Support Desk, toll-free, at 1-800-518-4726, in order to take advantage
of this flexibility.
[[Page 31172]]
2. Submission of Proprietary Information: Given the types of
projects that may be proposed in applications for this competition,
your application may include business information that you consider
proprietary.
In 34 CFR 5.11 we define ``business information'' and describe the
process we use in determining whether any of that information is
proprietary and, thus, protected from disclosure under Exemption 4 of
the Freedom of Information Act (5 U.S.C. 552, as amended).
Because we plan to make successful applications available to the
public, you may wish to request confidentiality of business
information.
Consistent with Executive Order 12600, please designate in your
application any information that you believe is exempt from disclosure
under Exemption 4. In the appropriate Appendix section of your
application, under ``Other Attachments Form,'' please list the page
number or numbers on which we can find this information. For additional
information please see 34 CFR 5.11(c).
3. Intergovernmental Review: This competition is subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the regulations in 34 CFR part 79.
Information about Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs under
Executive Order 12372 is in the application package for this program.
4. Funding Restrictions: Grantees must use the grant funds to open
and prepare for the operation of a new charter school; to open and
prepare for the operation of a replicated high-quality charter school;
or to expand a high-quality charter school, as applicable. Grant funds
must be used to carry out allowable activities, described in section
4303(h) of the ESEA, which include the following:
(a) Preparing teachers, school leaders, and specialized
instructional support personnel, including through paying the costs
associated with--
(1) Providing professional development; and
(2) Hiring and compensating, during the eligible applicant's
planning period specified in the application for funds, one or more of
the following:
(i) Teachers.
(ii) School leaders.
(iii) Specialized instructional support personnel.
(b) Acquiring supplies, training, equipment (including technology),
and educational materials (including developing and acquiring
instructional materials).
(c) Carrying out necessary renovations to ensure that a new school
building complies with applicable statutes and regulations, and minor
facilities repairs (excluding construction).
(d) Providing one-time, startup costs associated with providing
transportation to students to and from the charter school.
(e) Carrying out community engagement activities, which may include
paying the cost of student and staff recruitment.
(f) Providing for other appropriate, non-sustained costs related to
the opening of new charter schools, or the replication or expansion of
high-quality charter schools, as applicable, when such costs cannot be
met from other sources.
A grant awarded by the Secretary under this competition may be for
a period of not more than five years, of which the grantee may use not
more than 18 months for planning and program design. (Section
4303(d)(1)(B) of the ESEA). Applicants may propose to support only one
charter school per grant application.
We reference additional regulations outlining funding restrictions
in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice.
5. Recommended Page Limit: The application narrative (Part III of
the application) is where you, the applicant, address the selection
criteria that reviewers use to evaluate your application. We recommend
that you (1) limit the narrative to no more than 50 pages, and (2) use
the following standards:
A ``page'' is 8.5'' x 11'', on one side only, with 1''
margins at the top, bottom, and both sides.
Double space (no more than three lines per vertical inch)
all text in the application narrative, including titles, headings,
footnotes, quotations, references, and captions, as well as all text in
charts, tables, figures, and graphs.
Use a font that is either 12 point or larger or no smaller
than 10 pitch (characters per inch).
Use one of the following fonts: Times New Roman, Courier,
Courier New, or Arial.
The recommended page limit does not apply to Part I, the cover
sheet; Part II, the budget section, including the narrative budget
justification; Part IV, the assurances and certifications; or the one-
page abstract, the resumes, the bibliography, or the letters of
support. However, the recommended page limit does apply to all of the
application narrative.
6. Notice of Intent to Apply: The Department will be able to
develop a more efficient process for reviewing grant applications if it
has a better understanding of the number of entities that intend to
apply for funding under this competition. Therefore, we strongly
encourage each potential applicant to notify us of their intent to
submit an application for funding by sending an email to
[email protected] with FY 2020 CSP Developer Intent to Apply in the
subject line, by June 1, 2020. Applicants that do not send a notice of
intent to apply may still apply for funding.
V. Application Review Information
1. Selection Criteria. The selection criteria for applicants
submitting applications under CFDA numbers 84.282B and 84.282E are
listed in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this section, respectively. These
selection criteria are from the NFP and 34 CFR 75.210. The maximum
possible score for addressing all of the criteria in each section is
100 points. The maximum possible score for addressing each criterion is
indicated in parentheses following the criterion.
In evaluating an application for a Developer Grant, the Secretary
considers the following criteria:
(a) Selection Criteria for Grants for the Opening of New Charter
Schools (CFDA number 84.282B).
(1) Quality of the management plan (up to 30 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the management plan for the
proposed project. In determining the quality of the management plan for
the proposed project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The adequacy of the management plan to achieve the objectives
of the proposed project on time and within budget, including clearly
defined responsibilities, timelines, and milestones for accomplishing
project tasks (up to 15 points). (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(i))
(ii) The extent to which the time commitments of the project
director and principal investigator and other key project personnel are
appropriate and adequate to meet the objectives of the proposed project
(up to 10 points). (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(iv))
(iii) How the applicant will ensure that a diversity of
perspectives are brought to bear in the operation of the proposed
project, including those of parents, teachers, the business community,
a variety of disciplinary and professional fields, recipients or
beneficiaries of services, or others, as appropriate (up to 5 points).
(34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(v))
(2) Quality of the continuation plan (up to 10 points).
[[Page 31173]]
In determining the quality of the continuation plan, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the eligible applicant is prepared to
continue to operate the charter school that would receive grant funds
in a manner consistent with the eligible applicant's application once
the grant funds under this program are no longer available. (NFP)
(3) Significance of contribution in assisting educationally
disadvantaged students (up to 20 points).
In determining the significance of the contribution the proposed
project will make in expanding educational opportunity for
educationally disadvantaged students and enabling those students to
meet challenging State academic standards, the Secretary considers the
quality of the plan to ensure that the charter school the applicant
proposes to open, replicate, or expand will recruit, enroll, and
effectively serve educationally disadvantaged students, which include
children with disabilities and English learners. (NFP)
(4) Quality of the project design (up to 25 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a
rationale (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 10 points). (34 CFR
75.210(c)(2)(xxix))
(ii) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable
(up to 10 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(iii) The extent to which the design for implementing and
evaluating the proposed project will result in information to guide
possible replication of project activities or strategies, including
information about the effectiveness of the approach or strategies
employed by the project (up to 5 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(x))
(5) Quality of the project personnel (up to 15 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project.
(i) In determining the quality of project personnel, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability (up to 5 points). (34 CFR
75.210(e)(2))
(ii) In addition, the Secretary considers the qualifications,
including relevant training and experience, of key project personnel
(up to 10 points). (34 CFR 75.210(e)(3)(ii))
(b) Selection Criteria for Replication and Expansion Grants (CFDA
number 84.282E).
(1) Quality of the eligible applicant (up to 30 points).
In determining the quality of the eligible applicant, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the academic achievement results (including
annual student performance on statewide assessments and annual student
attendance and retention rates and where applicable and available,
student academic growth, high school graduation rates, postsecondary
enrollment and persistence rates, including in college or career
training programs, employment rates, earnings and other academic
outcomes) for educationally disadvantaged students served by the
charter schools operated or managed by the applicant have exceeded the
average academic achievement results for such students served by other
public schools in the State (up to 10 points). (NFP)
(ii) The extent to which one or more charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant have closed; have had a charter revoked due to
noncompliance with statutory or regulatory requirements; or have had
their affiliation with the applicant revoked or terminated, including
through voluntary disaffiliation (up to 10 points). (NFP)
(iii) The extent to which one or more charter schools operated or
managed by the applicant have had any significant issues in the area of
financial or operational management or student safety, or have
otherwise experienced significant problems with statutory or regulatory
compliance that could lead to revocation of the school's charter (up to
5 points). (NFP)
(iv) The extent to which the schools operated or managed by the
applicant demonstrate strong results on measurable outcomes in non-
academic areas such as, but not limited to, parent satisfaction, school
climate, student mental health, civic engagement, and crime prevention
and reduction (up to 5 points). (NFP)
(2) Quality of the continuation plan (up to 10 points).
In determining the quality of the continuation plan, the Secretary
considers the extent to which the eligible applicant is prepared to
continue to operate the charter school that would receive grant funds
in a manner consistent with the eligible applicant's application once
the grant funds under this program are no longer available. (NFP)
(3) Significance of contribution in assisting educationally
disadvantaged students (up to 20 points).
In determining the significance of the contribution the proposed
project will make in expanding educational opportunity for
educationally disadvantaged students and enabling those students to
meet challenging State academic standards, the Secretary considers the
quality of the plan to ensure that the charter school the applicant
proposes to open, replicate, or expand will recruit, enroll, and
effectively serve educationally disadvantaged students, which include
children with disabilities and English learners. (NFP)
(4) Quality of the project design (up to 25 points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the design of the proposed
project. In determining the quality of the design of the proposed
project, the Secretary considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the proposed project demonstrates a
rationale (as defined in 34 CFR 77.1(c)) (up to 10 points). (34 CFR
75.210(c)(2)(xxix))
(ii) The extent to which the goals, objectives, and outcomes to be
achieved by the proposed project are clearly specified and measurable
(up to 10 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(i))
(iii) The extent to which the design for implementing and
evaluating the proposed project will result in information to guide
possible replication of project activities or strategies, including
information about the effectiveness of the approach or strategies
employed by the project (up to 5 points). (34 CFR 75.210(c)(2)(x))
(5) Quality of the project personnel and management plan (up to 15
points).
The Secretary considers the quality of the personnel who will carry
out the proposed project and the management plan. In determining the
quality of project personnel and the management plan, the Secretary
considers the following factors:
(i) The extent to which the applicant encourages applications for
employment from persons who are members of groups that have
traditionally been underrepresented based on race, color, national
origin, gender, age, or disability (up to 2 points). (34 CFR
75.210(e)(2))
(ii) The qualifications, including relevant training and
experience, of key project personnel (up to 10 points). (34 CFR
75.210(e)(3)(i))
(iii) The adequacy of procedures for ensuring feedback and
continuous improvement in the operation of the
[[Page 31174]]
proposed project (up to 3 points). (34 CFR 75.210(g)(2)(ii))
2. Review and Selection Process: We remind potential applicants
that in reviewing applications in any discretionary grant competition,
the Secretary may consider, under 34 CFR 75.217(d)(3), the past
performance of the applicant in carrying out a previous award, such as
the applicant's use of funds, achievement of project objectives, and
compliance with grant conditions. The Secretary may also consider
whether the applicant failed to submit a timely performance report or
submitted a report of unacceptable quality.
In addition, in making a competitive grant award, the Secretary
requires various assurances, including those applicable to Federal
civil rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or
activities receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department
(34 CFR 100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
3. Risk Assessment and Specific Conditions: Consistent with 2 CFR
200.205, before awarding grants under this competition the Department
conducts a review of the risks posed by applicants. Under 2 CFR
3474.10, the Secretary may impose specific conditions and, in
appropriate circumstances, high-risk conditions on a grant if the
applicant or grantee is not financially stable; has a history of
unsatisfactory performance; has a financial or other management system
that does not meet the standards in 2 CFR part 200, subpart D; has not
fulfilled the conditions of a prior grant; or is otherwise not
responsible.
4. Integrity and Performance System: If you are selected under this
competition to receive an award that over the course of the project
period may exceed the simplified acquisition threshold (currently
$250,000), under 2 CFR 200.205(a)(2) we must make a judgment about your
integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under Federal
awards--that is, the risk posed by you as an applicant--before we make
an award. In doing so, we must consider any information about you that
is in the integrity and performance system (currently referred to as
the Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System
(FAPIIS)), accessible through SAM. You may review and comment on any
information about yourself that a Federal agency previously entered and
that is currently in FAPIIS.
Please note that, if the total value of your currently active
grants, cooperative agreements, and procurement contracts from the
Federal Government exceeds $10,000,000, the reporting requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, require you to report certain integrity
information to FAPIIS semiannually. Please review the requirements in 2
CFR part 200, Appendix XII, if this grant plus all the other Federal
funds you receive exceed $10,000,000.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application is successful, we notify your
U.S. Representative and U.S. Senators and send you a Grant Award
Notification (GAN); or we may send you an email containing a link to
access an electronic version of your GAN. We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or not selected for funding,
we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy requirements in the application
package and reference these and other requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
We reference the regulations outlining the terms and conditions of
an award in the Applicable Regulations section of this notice and
include these and other specific conditions in the GAN. The GAN also
incorporates your approved application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Open Licensing Requirements: Unless an exception applies, if you
are awarded a grant under this competition, you will be required to
openly license to the public grant deliverables created in whole, or in
part, with Department grant funds. When the deliverable consists of
modifications to pre-existing works, the license extends only to those
modifications that can be separately identified and only to the extent
that open licensing is permitted under the terms of any licenses or
other legal restrictions on the use of pre-existing works.
Additionally, a grantee or subgrantee that is awarded competitive grant
funds must have a plan to disseminate these public grant deliverables.
This dissemination plan can be developed and submitted after your
application has been reviewed and selected for funding. For additional
information on the open licensing requirements please refer to 2 CFR
3474.20.
4. Reporting: (a) If you apply for a grant under this competition,
you must ensure that you have in place the necessary processes and
systems to comply with the reporting requirements in 2 CFR part 170
should you receive funding under the competition. This does not apply
if you have an exception under 2 CFR 170.110(b).
(b) At the end of your project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multiyear award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the most current performance and
financial expenditure information as directed by the Secretary under 34
CFR 75.118. The Secretary may also require more frequent performance
reports under 34 CFR 75.720(c). For specific requirements on reporting,
please go to www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/appforms/appforms.html.
(c) Under 34 CFR 75.250(b), the Secretary may provide a grantee
with additional funding for data collection analysis and reporting. In
this case the Secretary establishes a data collection period.
5. Performance Measures: (a) The Secretary has two performance
indicators to measure progress toward achieving the purposes of the
program, which are discussed elsewhere in this notice. The performance
indicators are: (1) The number of charter schools in operation around
the Nation and (2) the percentage of fourth- and eighth-grade charter
school students who are achieving at or above the proficient level on
State assessments in mathematics and reading/language arts.
Additionally, the Secretary has established the following measure to
examine the efficiency of the CSP: The Federal cost per student in
implementing a successful school (defined as a school in operation for
three or more consecutive years).
(b) Project-Specific Performance Measures. Applicants must propose
project-specific performance measures and performance targets
consistent with the objectives of the proposed project. Applications
must provide the following information as directed under 34 CFR
75.110(b) and (c):
(1) Performance measures. How each proposed performance measure
would accurately measure the performance of the project and how the
proposed performance measure would be consistent with the performance
measures established for the program funding the competition.
(2) Baseline data. (i) Why each proposed baseline is valid; or (ii)
if the applicant has determined that there are no established baseline
data for a particular performance measure, an explanation of why there
is no established baseline and of how and when, during the project
period, the applicant would establish a valid baseline for the
performance measure.
[[Page 31175]]
(3) Performance targets. Why each proposed performance target is
ambitious yet achievable compared to the baseline for the performance
measure and when, during the project period, the applicant would meet
the performance target(s).
(4) Data collection and reporting. (i) The data collection and
reporting methods the applicant would use and why those methods are
likely to yield reliable, valid, and meaningful performance data; and
(ii) the applicant's capacity to collect and report reliable, valid,
and meaningful performance data, as evidenced by high-quality data
collection, analysis, and reporting in other projects or research.
All grantees must submit an annual performance report with
information that is responsive to these performance measures.
6. Continuation Awards: In making a continuation award under 34 CFR
75.253, the Secretary considers, among other things: Whether a grantee
has made substantial progress in achieving the goals and objectives of
the project; whether the grantee has expended funds in a manner that is
consistent with its approved application and budget; and, if the
Secretary has established performance measurement requirements, the
performance targets in the grantee's approved application.
In making a continuation award, the Secretary also considers
whether the grantee is operating in compliance with the assurances in
its approved application, including those applicable to Federal civil
rights laws that prohibit discrimination in programs or activities
receiving Federal financial assistance from the Department (34 CFR
100.4, 104.5, 106.4, 108.8, and 110.23).
7. Project Director's Meeting: Applicants approved for funding
under this competition must attend a two-day meeting for project
directors at a location to be determined in the continental United
States during each year of the project. Applicants may include the cost
of attending this meeting as an administrative cost in their proposed
budgets.
VII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with disabilities can obtain this
document and a copy of the application package in an accessible format
(e.g., braille, large print, audiotape, or compact disc) on request to
the program contact person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document: The official version of this
document is the document published in the Federal Register. You may
access the official edition of the Federal Register and the Code of
Federal Regulations at www.govinfo.gov. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other documents of this Department published
in the Federal Register, in text or Portable Document Format (PDF). To
use PDF you must have Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is available free at
the site.
You may also access documents of the Department published in the
Federal Register by using the article search feature at
www.federalregister.gov. Specifically, through the advanced search
feature at this site, you can limit your search to documents published
by the Department.
Frank T. Brogan,
Assistant Secretary for Elementary and Secondary Education.
[FR Doc. 2020-11047 Filed 5-21-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000-01-P